Vought V-141

Last updated
V-141 / V-143
Vought V-141 side.jpg
The V-141
RoleFighter aircraft
National originUnited States
Manufacturer Vought
First flight29 March 1936
Number built1
Developed from Northrop 3-A

The Vought V-141 (which was later redesignated V-143 after modification) was a prototype American single-seat fighter aircraft of the 1930s. It was a development of the unsuccessful Northrop 3-A design, but was itself a failure, being rejected by the United States Army Air Corps. The sole prototype was sold to the Japanese Army in 1937, but no production followed, with the type proving to be inferior to existing Japanese fighters.

Contents

Design and development

In 1935, Northrop had flown the Northrop 3A, a single-engined, single-seat monoplane with a fixed undercarriage, to meet a United States Army Air Corps (USAAC) requirement for a single-seat fighter. This was a development of Northrop's XFT prototype carrier fighter, and shared the XFT's instability and tendency to enter spins. The sole Northrop 3A prototype disappeared during a test flight over the Pacific on 30 July 1935, and Northrop decided to abandon further development of the 3A. [1] [2]

The Air Corps' requirement for a new fighter was still outstanding however, with final evaluation being delayed several times. [3] Despite the warnings of his engineers, Eugene Wright, President of Vought, decided to buy the 3A project from Northrop with the hope of winning orders from the Air Corps, the purchase being agreed early in 1936. [2] [4]

Vought's design team had little time to work on the new fighter if it was to compete in the Air Corps competition, and changes made to the design purchased from Northrop were relatively small, with an enlarged rudder being fitted in a bid to solve the handling problems of the XFT and 3A, while the undercarriage and engine cowling were also modified. [5] In this form, the prototype fighter, designated Vought V-141 by the manufacturer, made its first flight on 29 March 1936. [2] Like the 3A, the V-141 was a low-wing monoplane with a retractable tailwheel undercarriage and an enclosed cockpit. It was powered by a 750 hp (560 kW) Pratt & Whitney R-1535 Twin Wasp Junior radial engine, a slightly more powerful version of the engine that powered the 3A. [6] [7]

The competing bids were evaluated by the Air Corps in April 1936. Vought offered to sell V-141s at a unit price of $34,148 for a batch of 25 aircraft (excluding engines and Government provided equipment), reducing to $16,041 for a batch of 200 aircraft. Testing showed that the V-141 still had poor handling and was prone to spinning, and also suffered from tail flutter, leading to it being rejected. The primary winner of the competition was Seversky, with 77 P-35s being ordered. [8]

Vought then offered it for export, modifying it with larger tail surfaces and renaming it the Vought V-143. This was offered to Argentina as a replacement for its obsolete Dewoitine D.21s. When it came to be tested in Argentina, Curtiss-Wright representatives, eager to sell the Curtiss 75, pointed out that the Vought was fitted with an anti-spin parachute in the tail. When the Argentines demanded that the spin characteristics be demonstrated without the parachute, Vought refused, and the Curtiss 75 was selected instead. [2] [7] [9]

Further rejections from Turkey, Norway and Yugoslavia followed. [5] This led to Vought, in a final attempt to solve the fighter's handling problems, to rebuild the aircraft again in May 1937, with a longer rear fuselage and a new taller tail resembling that of the Vought SB2U. The engine was replaced by an 825 hp (615 kW) R-1535-SB4G. [7] Thus modified, the V-143 was tested again by the USAAC in June 1937 but was rejected again. The V-143 prototype was finally purchased by Japan in July 1937 for $175,000. [2] It underwent a technical evaluation by the Japanese Navy as the Navy Experimental Fighter Type V (for Vought) (short designation AXV1), although they had no intention of using them. [10] [11]

Specifications (V-143 – final layout)

Data from The American Fighter [10]

General characteristics

Performance

Armament

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curtiss-Wright XF-87 Blackhawk</span> Prototype all-weather interceptor

The Curtiss-Wright XF-87 Blackhawk was a prototype American all-weather jet fighter-interceptor, and the company's last aircraft project. Designed as a replacement for the World War II–era propeller-driven P-61 Black Widow night/interceptor aircraft, the XF-87 lost in government procurement competition to the Northrop F-89 Scorpion. The loss of the contract was fatal to the company; the Curtiss-Wright Corporation closed down its aviation division, selling its assets to North American Aviation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seversky P-35</span> 1935 fighter aircraft series by Seversky

The Seversky P-35 is an American fighter aircraft built by the Seversky Aircraft Company in the late 1930s. A contemporary of the Hawker Hurricane and Messerschmitt Bf 109, the P-35 was the first single-seat fighter in United States Army Air Corps to feature all-metal construction, retractable landing gear, and an enclosed cockpit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curtiss-Wright XP-55 Ascender</span> 1943 prototype fighter aircraft

The Curtiss-Wright XP-55 Ascender is a 1940s United States prototype fighter aircraft built by Curtiss-Wright. Along with the Vultee XP-54 and Northrop XP-56, it resulted from United States Army Air Corps proposal R-40C issued on 27 November 1939 for aircraft with improved performance, armament, and pilot visibility over existing fighters; it specifically allowed for unconventional aircraft designs. An unusual design for its time, it had a canard configuration with a rear-mounted engine, and two vertical tails at end of swept wings. Because of its pusher design, it was satirically referred to as the "Ass-ender". Like the XP-54, the Ascender was designed for the 1,800 hp Pratt & Whitney X-1800 24-Cylinder H-engine, but was redesigned after that engine project was canceled. It was also the first Curtiss fighter aircraft to use tricycle landing gear.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vought SB2U Vindicator</span> US Navy dive bomber

The Vought SB2U Vindicator is an American carrier-based dive bomber developed for the United States Navy in the 1930s, the first monoplane in this role. Vindicators still remained in service at the time of the Battle of Midway, but by 1943, all had been withdrawn to training units. It was known as the Chesapeake in Royal Navy service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curtiss SBC Helldiver</span> US navy biplane

The Curtiss SBC Helldiver was a two-seat scout bomber and dive bomber built by the Curtiss-Wright Corporation. It was the last combat military biplane procured by the United States Navy. Delivered in 1937, it became obsolete even before World War II and was kept well away from combat with Axis fighters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curtiss SOC Seagull</span> Scout seaplane in the US Navy

The Curtiss SOC Seagull was an American single-engined scout observation seaplane, designed by Alexander Solla of the Curtiss-Wright Corporation for the United States Navy. The aircraft served on battleships and cruisers in a seaplane configuration, being launched by catapult and recovered from a sea landing. The wings folded back against the fuselage for storage aboard ship. When based ashore or on carriers the single float was replaced by fixed wheeled landing gear.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bell XFL Airabonita</span> American fighter aircraft

The Bell XFL Airabonita was an American experimental carrier-based interceptor aircraft developed for the United States Navy by Bell Aircraft Corporation of Buffalo, New York. It was similar to and a parallel development of the U.S. Army Air Corps’ land-based P-39 Airacobra, differing mainly in the use of a tailwheel undercarriage in place of the P-39's tricycle gear. Only one prototype was built.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curtiss-Wright CW-21</span> American fighter-interceptor plane

The Curtiss-Wright Model 21 was an American fighter-interceptor developed by the St. Louis Airplane Division of Curtiss-Wright Corporation during the 1930s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vought XF3U</span>

The Vought XF3U was the prototype of a two-seat, all-metal biplane fighter, built by Vought Aircraft Company of Dallas, Texas for the United States Navy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vought SBU Corsair</span>

The Vought SBU-1 Corsair was a two-seat, all-metal biplane dive bomber built by Vought Aircraft Company of Dallas, Texas for the US Navy. Its design was based upon the F3U-1 two-seat fighter that was abandoned when the Navy decided not to obtain any more two-seat fighters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boeing YB-9</span> Prototype bomber aircraft by Boeing

The Boeing YB-9 was the first all-metal monoplane bomber aircraft designed for the United States Army Air Corps. The YB-9 was a much enlarged twin-engine development of Boeing's single-engine Model 200 Monomail commercial transport.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northrop BT</span> 1935 bomber aircraft family

The Northrop BT was an American two-seat, single-engine monoplane dive bomber built by the Northrop Corporation for the United States Navy. At the time, Northrop was a subsidiary of the Douglas Aircraft Company. While unsuccessful in its own right, the BT was subsequently redesigned into the Douglas SBD Dauntless, which would form the backbone of the Navy's dive bomber force.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas-Morse MB-3</span>

The Thomas-Morse MB-3 was an open-cockpit biplane fighter primarily manufactured by the Boeing Company for the U.S. Army Air Service in 1922. The MB-3A was the mainstay fighter for the Air Service between 1922 and 1925.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Consolidated P-30</span> American two-seat fighter

The Consolidated P-30 (PB-2) was a 1930s United States two-seat fighter aircraft. An attack version called the A-11 was also built, along with 2 Y1P-25 prototypes and YP-27, Y1P-28, and XP-33 proposals. The P-30 is significant for being the first fighter in United States Army Air Corps service to have retractable landing gear, an enclosed and heated cockpit for the pilot, and an exhaust-driven turbo-supercharger for altitude operation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curtiss 18</span>

The Curtiss 18T, unofficially known as the Wasp and by the United States Navy as the Kirkham, was an early American triplane fighter aircraft designed by Curtiss for the US Navy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vought XSB3U</span>

The Vought XSB3U was an American biplane scout bomber developed by Vought-Sikorsky for the United States Navy during the 1930s. Developed as an alternative to the SB2U Vindicator monoplane, the aircraft proved unsatisfactory to the Navy in comparison, and development was not pursued.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Lakes BG</span> US carrier-based dive bomber

The Great Lakes BG was an American carrier-based dive bomber of the 1930s. Designed and built by the Great Lakes Aircraft Company of Cleveland, Ohio, 61 were used by the United States Navy and United States Marine Corps from 1934 to 1940.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Douglas XFD</span> Experimental two-seat naval biplane fighter

The Douglas XFD was a carrier-based biplane fighter aircraft designed for the United States Navy, and the first fighter to be built by the Douglas Aircraft Company. A victim of changing requirements, no production was undertaken.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northrop XFT</span> Type of aircraft

The Northrop XFT was an American prototype fighter aircraft of the 1930s. A single engined low-winged monoplane, it was designed and built to meet a United States Navy order for an advanced carrier based fighter. It exhibited poor handling, and was rejected by the Navy, the single prototype being lost in a crash. A variant, the Northrop 3A, also was unsuccessful.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orenco B</span> Type of aircraft

The Orenco B was a prototype American fighter aircraft of World War I. It was a single-engined, single-seat biplane that flew in 1918. Although it demonstrated good performance, it did not enter large scale service.

References

Notes

  1. Angelucci and Bowers 1987, p. 361.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Air Enthusiast October 1972, pp. 199–200.
  3. Green and Swanborough 1979, pp. 10–11.
  4. Angelucci and Bowers 1987, pp. 434–435.
  5. 1 2 Angelucci and Bowers 1987, p. 435.
  6. Angelucci and Bowers 1987, pp. 435–436.
  7. 1 2 3 Green and Swanborough 1994, p. 585.
  8. Green and Swanborough 1979, p. 11.
  9. Hagedorn 1993, p. 321.
  10. 1 2 Angelucci and Bowers 1987, p. 436.
  11. Francillon 1970, p. 550.

Bibliography