2000 Danish euro referendum

Last updated

2000 Danish euro referendum
Flag of Denmark.svg
28 September 2000
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svg Yes1,620,35346.79%
Light brown x.svg No1,842,81453.21%
Valid votes3,463,16798.85%
Invalid or blank votes40,3581.15%
Total votes3,503,525100.00%
Registered voters/turnout3,999,32587.6%

Folkeafstemning 2000 - Opstillingskredse.svg
Results by nomination district and constituency
Yes:      50–55%     55–60%     60–65%     65–70%
No:      50–55%     55–60%     60–65%

A referendum on joining the Eurozone was held in Denmark on 28 September 2000. [1] It was rejected by 53.2% of voters with a turnout of 87.6%. [2]

Contents

Background

On 2 June 1992, Danish voters rejected the Maastricht Treaty in a referendum. On 18 May 1993, Denmark ratified an amended treaty following the Edinburgh Agreement. This meant that, among three other areas, Denmark would not be part of the European Monetary Union (EMU). In March 2000, as the euro was being launched, the Danish government led by Poul Nyrup Rasmussen, a supporter of the common currency, decided to hold a referendum on Danish entry into the monetary union. [2] In May 2000 the government tabled the bill. According to the bill, if the outcome of the referendum was in favour of the adoption of the euro, Denmark would be able to join the euro area from 1 January 2002 with the euro as "book money". Euro banknotes and coins would be introduced as from 1 January 2004, after which krone banknotes and coins would be withdrawn. [3]

The largest political parties, including the opposition Liberals and Conservatives, were all in favour of entering the EMU. So were the industrial and banking sectors and the majority of labour unions. Only one national paper (Ekstra Bladet) came out against EMU. [4] Five political parties did oppose EMU: two right-wing parties (the Danish People’s Party and the Progress Party), two left-wing parties (The Socialist People's Party and The Red-Green Alliance) and the centre-right Christian People’s Party. However, these parties were all relatively small and represented only 39 of 179 seats in Parliament at the time). [4]

Campaign

When the referendum was called, support for the "Yes" side was just below 50% while the "No" side was just below 40% according to opinion polls. However, public opinion shifted and from June 2000 until the referendum in September all polls showed 15–20 per cent undecided and an almost fifty-fifty split between EMU-supporters and EMU-sceptics. [5]

Several events eroded support for the "Yes" side: [6]

Results

ChoiceVotes%
For1,620,35346.79
Against1,842,81453.21
Total3,463,167100.00
Valid votes3,463,16798.85
Invalid/blank votes40,3581.15
Total votes3,503,525100.00
Registered voters/turnout3,999,32587.60
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

By county

RegionForAgainstElectorateVotes% For
Copenhagen & Frederiksberg Municipality 169,154201,263446,155376,29144.9%
Copenhagen County 188,824207,026450,043399,86447.2%
Frederiksborg County 120,627117,546269,775240,56250.1%
Roskilde County 74,48779,871173,068155,94047.8%
West Zealand County 81,899112,501223,692196,34441.7%
Storstrøm County 73,936100,523200,123176,29441.9%
Bornholm County 11,66216,75233,74728,84540.4%
Fyn County 142,461166,395357,537312,23745.6%
South Jutland County 78,91483,912187,254164,61048.0%
Ribe County 68,53374,856165,339144,95347.3%
Vejle County 107,277118,464260,740229,16246.8%
Ringkjøbing County 88,40086,837202,362177,28049.9%
Århus County 202,714213,946479,278421,74748.0%
Viborg County 71,85679,198175,053152,90247.0%
North Jutland County 139,609183,724375,159326,49442.8%
Source: European Election Database

See also

References

  1. Nohlen, D & Stöver, P (2010) Elections in Europe: A data handbook, p525 ISBN   978-3-8329-5609-7
  2. 1 2 Results and background for referendum EU Oplysningen (in Danish)
  3. Abildgren, Kim (2010). Monetary History of Denmark 1990–2005 (PDF). Copenhagen: Danmarks Nationalbank. p. 219.
  4. 1 2 Marcussen, Martin; Mette Zølner (2003). "The Danish EMU Referendum 2000: Business as Usual". Government and Opposition. 36 (3): 379–402 [386]. doi:10.1111/1477-7053.00071. S2CID   145315830.
  5. Marcussen and Zølner, 390.
  6. Marcussen and Zølner, 389-394.