Bye Plot

Last updated

The Bye Plot of 1603 was a conspiracy, by Roman Catholic priests and Puritans aiming at tolerance for their respective denominations, to kidnap the new English King, James I of England. It is referred to as the "bye" plot, because at the time it was presented as a minor component of a larger plot (the so-called "main" plot).

Contents

Background

The Anglo-Spanish War had been continuing for nearly two decades, with fighting at sea, in the Netherlands and in Ireland. Elizabeth I of England died at the end of March 1603, and James VI of Scotland claimed the English throne, without overt opposition. In England and Wales, a substantial number of Catholics were subject to fines if they did not attend Church of England services, under a system of Penal Laws. English Catholics protested loyalty to the Crown, and wished the legal constraints on their worship relaxed. They were ministered to by priests, both of the Society of Jesus and other religious orders active in England as a mission, and seminary priests and others not in religious orders (secular priests). The legal position of these priests was unclear.

Divisions among English Catholics

A divisive quarrel and pamphlet war among English Catholics, the Archpriest controversy, had in 1603 been contentious for about five years. The resulting alignment of Catholic priests had a great deal to do with making the plots of 1603 impractical, and also made one side of the argument receptive to the idea of informing the London government.

William Watson took the "appellant" side in the Archpriest Controversy, hostile to George Blackwell who had been appointed by the Holy See. Useful to the English government and church for his polemics, Watson was under the protection of Richard Bancroft, then bishop of London. In September 1601, Watson was resident at Fulham Palace. [1] In 1602 he was confined in The Clink, but kept in close touch with Bancroft. [2]

The plot was initially exposed by the archpriest Blackwell and two Jesuits, John Gerard and Henry Garnet, who were on the other side of the dispute. These three (by independent routes) passed on information they had relating to the conspiracy. They had other reasons besides the ongoing controversy: they feared retribution against Catholics if the plan failed; and entertained suspicions regarding the political motivations of the secular priests.[ citation needed ] [3]

The plotters

The plot is known also as Watson's Plot, the Catholic Plot, the Surprising Treason, [4] or the Treason of the Priests. [5] Those involved were not in fact exclusively Catholic priests: Thomas Grey, 15th Baron Grey de Wilton was a Puritan layman who became drawn in, though the plot never went farther than far-fetched discussion. Another lay conspirator was Sir Griffin Markham. [6]

While they may have had in common a wish for religious toleration, their motivations were varied. Watson wished to have no more fines for recusancy levied. Another plank in the platform of the Bye Plot was the removal of certain ministers of the king. To the extent that these matters can be clarified, the Main Plot that had been laid in parallel wished also for regime change, with James replaced on the throne by Arbella Stuart.

Events of 1603

King James moved south at a leisurely pace, having reached Theobalds House in Hertfordshire on 3 May. [7] The scheme, such as it was, depended on Markham's view in May that there was a "Scottish precedent" for seizing the person of the king for political advantage. [2] It was in late May or early June (on Gerard's own account) that someone (probably Markham) tried to recruit the Jesuit John Gerard. Gerard's reaction was negative, and he wrote to Henry Garnet and George Blackwell asking them to put a spoke in the wheels of the plot. [8]

June

The date set by Watson for the plot to be carried out was 24 June. [9] This was St John Baptist's Day, and a collar day; in the planning of the plot its significance was that courtiers would be at court and regaled ceremonially. [10]

As the date and midsummer approached, Gerard had contacted a Scottish courtier asking that he make the king aware, while also Blackwell, the official head of the English Catholic secular clergy operating from hiding, took roundabout steps. Blackwell's communication outran Gerard's. [8]

Blackwell revealed something of the plot to the government through an intermediary, the recusant John Gage, who had married Margaret, the daughter of Sir Thomas Copley. [11] [12] When Gage wrote to Sir Robert Cecil, on 28 June, Cecil was already aware of plotting. The Catholic returned exile and conspirator Anthony Copley had also written to Blackwell about the Bye Plot; he was Sir Thomas Copley's son and therefore Gage's brother-in-law. Blackwell had written to Gage; Cecil assumed there was something more behind these exchanges, so that he asked Gage to produce Blackwell before the Council. [4] It has been suggested that Copley consciously played the double agent. [2]

In the event, Lord Grey withdrew ahead of the day, and the plotters scattered. [9]

July

A significant arrest was of Sir George Brooke who was in the Tower of London in July. Markham and Brooke wanted to supplant current members of the Privy Council. Henry Brooke, 11th Baron Cobham was his brother, and a conspirator in the more serious "Main Plot". Sir George was arraigned on 15 July, and in his eagerness to clear himself, made confessions that clarified to the investigators that two separate groups of plotters had been active. [5] On 16 July a proclamation was issued for Watson's arrest. [2] Bancroft at around this time had good reason to distance himself from Watson, and claimed he had not seen him since before the queen died. [1]

King James's coronation went ahead on 25 July, his name day (for James the Greater), as planned. His ceremonial entry into London, however, was postponed until March 1604, for reasons including the plague; at this time Westminster did not form part of London. [13]

August

Watson was arrested around 5 August in a field by the River Wye near Hay-on-Wye, on the border of England and Wales. He made a confession about the plot, dated 10 August. [2] William Clark, another priest who had been an active organiser, was arrested in Worcester on 13 August. [14]

November

Further details of the Bye Plot were revealed by the Catholic priest Francis Barnaby, in prison. He was another appellant contact of Bancroft, who communicated for him with Christopher Bagshaw, and had worked with the plotter William Clark against English Jesuits. [15]

The Court had moved to Wilton House, near Salisbury in Wiltshire. There it was decided that trials could conveniently be held at the bishop's palace in Winchester, not very far away. [16] These trials took place 15–18 November. John Lingard in his History of England attributed the delay to the continued presence in the country of Charles de Ligne, 2nd Prince of Arenberg; Arenburg was there to represent the Spanish Netherlands at James's coronation, and the alleged contacts of the Main Plot with him were potentially embarrassing. [17]

On the 15th the two Catholic priests involved, Sir George Brooke and Sir Griffin Markham, and others, were tried. On the 17th Sir Walter Raleigh was tried, and the prosecution managed to make a case that he had been involved in the Bye Plot. Lord Grey as a baron was tried and found guilty by 31 peers, on 18 November, with Lord Cobham who was implicated in the Main Plot. [9] [18]

Guilty verdicts on the conspirators were reached; [19] the only acquittal on a high treason charge among the Bye Plot defendants was Sir Edward Parham. [20] Sir Edward Coke's prosecution case for Raleigh's involvement in the Bye Plot was tenuous and rhetorical, heavy on personal abuse, but Raleigh's role on the periphery of the Main Plot left him with much to explain. [21]

The two priests, Watson and Clark, were executed for their parts in the scheme, on 29 November. [15]

December

The lay conspirator George Brooke was executed on 5 December. [5] On 10 December Lord Grey with Markham was taken to the scaffold, pardoned, and spent the rest of his life in the Tower of London; [9] Dudley Carleton who witnessed the proceedings, involving also Lord Cobham, took it to be a well-scripted drama of the king's mercy. [22] In particular, Carleton concluded, it was staged for the benefit of Raleigh, who had been caught up in the Bye Plot charges. [23]

Aftermath

By an edict of 22 February 1604, King James ordered all Roman Catholic clergy ("Jesuits, Seminaries and other Priests") to leave his kingdom by 19 March. This edict had been drafted in July 1603 on the discovery of the plots. [24]

Anthony Copley was condemned to death; but he was pardoned on 18 August 1604, having made a full confession on the history of the plot. [25]

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 Cranfield, Nicholas W. S. "Bancroft, Richard". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/1272.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 "Watson, William (1559?-1603)"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  3. ↑ "Gerard, John (1564-1637)"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  4. 1 2 M. S. Giuseppi (editor), Calendar of the Cecil Papers in Hatfield House, Volume 15: 1603 (1930), pp. 5–29; British History Online.
  5. 1 2 3 "Brooke, George"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  6. ↑ Nicholls and Williams, p. 194; Google Books.
  7. ↑ Christopher Lee, 1603 (2003), p. 142.
  8. 1 2 Alice Hogge, God's Secret Agents (2005), pp. 311–2.
  9. 1 2 3 4 "Grey, Thomas (d.1614)"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  10. ↑ Bengtsen, p. 27; Google Books.
  11. ↑ Arblaster, Paul. "Blackwell, George". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/2541.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  12. ↑ Scott R. Pilarz, Robert Southwell and the Mission of Literature, 1561–1595: writing reconciliation (2004), p. 16; Google Books.
  13. ↑ Graham Parry, The Golden Age Restor'd: the culture of the Stuart Court, 1603–42 (1981), pp. 1–2; Google Books.
  14. ↑ Nicholls, Mark. "Clark, William". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/5476.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  15. 1 2 Sheils, William Joseph. "Barnaby, Francis". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/67452.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  16. ↑ Stephen Coote, A Play of Passion: The Life of Sir Walter Ralegh (1993), p. 305.
  17. ↑ John Lingard, The History of England, from the first invasion by the Romans to the accession of William and Mary in 1688 volume 7 (1854), p. 11; archive.org.
  18. ↑ Bengtsen, p. 29; Google Books.
  19. ↑ Arthur F. Kinney, Lies Like Truth: Shakespeare, Macbeth, and the cultural moment (2001), p. 64; Google Books.
  20. ↑ Nicholls and Williams, p. 300; Google Books.
  21. ↑ Boyer, Allen D. "Coke, Edward". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/5826.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  22. ↑ Peter G. Platt, Shakespeare and the Culture of Paradox (2009), p. 133; Google Books.
  23. ↑ Stephen Jay Greenblatt, Shakespearean Negotiations: the circulation of social energy in Renaissance England (1988), p. 195 note 18; Google Books.
  24. ↑ W. B. Patterson, King James VI and I and the Reunion of Christendom (2000), p. 49; Google Books.
  25. ↑ Dictionary of National Biography , Copley, Anthony (1567–1607?), poet and conspirator, by R. C. Christie. Published 1887.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gunpowder Plot</span> 1605 failed attempt to kill King James I

The Gunpowder Plot of 1605, in earlier centuries often called the Gunpowder Treason Plot or the Jesuit Treason, was a failed assassination attempt against King James I by a group of English Catholics led by Robert Catesby who sought to restore the Catholic monarchy to England after decades of persecution against Catholics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Cecil, 1st Earl of Salisbury</span> English government minister (1563–1612)

Robert Cecil, 1st Earl of Salisbury, was an English statesman noted for his direction of the government during the Union of the Crowns, as Tudor England gave way to Stuart rule (1603). Lord Salisbury served as the Secretary of State of England (1596–1612) and Lord High Treasurer (1608–1612), succeeding his father as Queen Elizabeth I's Lord Privy Seal and remaining in power during the first nine years of King James I's reign until his own death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Catesby</span> English conspirator

Robert Catesby was the leader of a group of English Catholics who planned the failed Gunpowder Plot of 1605.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rye House Plot</span> Plan to assassinate Charles II of England

The Rye House Plot of 1683 was a plan to assassinate King Charles II of England and his brother James, Duke of York. The royal party went from Westminster to Newmarket to see horse races and were expected to make the return journey on 1 April 1683, but because there was a major fire in Newmarket on 22 March, the races were cancelled, and the King and the Duke returned to London early. As a result, the planned attack never took place.

William Watson was an English Roman Catholic priest and conspirator, executed for treason.

The Main Plot was an alleged conspiracy of July 1603 by English courtiers to remove King James I from the English throne and to replace him with his cousin Lady Arbella Stuart. The plot was supposedly led by Lord Cobham and funded by the Spanish government. In a state trial, the defendants accused of involvement in the Main Plot were tried along with those of the Bye Plot. It is referred to as the "main" plot, because at the time it was presented as the principal ("main") plot of which the secondary plot was a minor component.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henry Percy, 9th Earl of Northumberland</span> English nobleman

Henry Percy, 9th Earl of Northumberland, KG was an English nobleman. He was a grandee and one of the wealthiest peers of the court of Elizabeth I. Under James I, Northumberland was a long-term prisoner in the Tower of London, due to the suspicion that he was complicit in the Gunpowder Plot. He is known for the circles he moved in as well as for his own achievements. He acquired the sobriquet The Wizard Earl, from his scientific and alchemical experiments, his passion for cartography, and his large library.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henry Brooke, 11th Baron Cobham</span> English peer

Henry Brooke, 11th Baron Cobham KG (22 November 1564 – 24 January 1618 /3 February 1618, lord of the Manor of Cobham, Kent, was an English peer who was implicated in the Main Plot against the rule of James I of England.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert and Thomas Wintour</span> Members of the Gunpowder plot

Robert Wintour and Thomas Wintour, also spelt Winter, were members of the Gunpowder Plot, a failed conspiracy to assassinate King James I. Brothers, they were related to other conspirators, such as their cousin, Robert Catesby, and a half-brother, John Wintour, also joined them following the plot's failure. Thomas was an intelligent and educated man, fluent in several languages and trained as a lawyer, but chose instead to become a soldier, fighting for England in the Low Countries, France, and possibly in Central Europe. By 1600, however, he changed his mind and became a fervent Catholic. On several occasions he travelled to the continent and entreated Spain on behalf of England's oppressed Catholics, and suggested that with Spanish support a Catholic rebellion was likely.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Everard Digby</span> 16th- and 17th-century English conspirator in the Gunpowder Plot of 1605

Sir Everard Digby was a member of the group of provincial members of the English nobility who planned the failed Gunpowder Plot of 1605. Although he was raised in a Anglican household and married a Protestant, Digby and his wife were secretly received into the strictly illegal and underground Catholic Church in England by the Jesuit priest Fr. John Gerard. In the autumn of 1605, he made a Christian pilgrimage to the shrine of St Winefride's Well in Holywell, Wales. About this time, he met Robert Catesby, who was planning to blow up the House of Lords with gunpowder as an alleged act of tyrannicide and a decapitation strike against King James I. Catesby then planned to lead a popular uprising aimed at regime change, through which a Catholic monarch would be placed upon the English throne.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Percy (Gunpowder Plot)</span> English conspirator

Thomas Percy was a member of the group of provincial English Catholics who planned the failed Gunpowder Plot of 1605. A tall, physically impressive man, little is known of his early life beyond his matriculation in 1579 at the University of Cambridge, and his marriage in 1591 to Martha Wright. In 1596 his second cousin once removed, Henry Percy, 9th Earl of Northumberland, appointed him constable of Alnwick Castle and made him responsible for the Percy family's northern estates. He served the earl in the Low Countries in about 1600–1601, and in the years before 1603 was his intermediary in a series of confidential communications with King James VI of Scotland.

Sir Griffin Markham was an English soldier.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John and Christopher Wright</span> Members of the Gunpowder Plot 1605

John (Jack) Wright, and Christopher (Kit) Wright, were members of the group of provincial English Catholics who planned the failed Gunpowder Plot of 1605, a conspiracy to assassinate King James I by blowing up the House of Lords. Their sister married another plotter, Thomas Percy. Educated at the same school in York, the Wrights had early links with Guy Fawkes, the man left in charge of the explosives stored in the undercroft beneath the House of Lords. As known recusants the brothers were on several occasions arrested for reasons of national security. Both were also members of the Earl of Essex's rebellion of 1601.

The Archpriest Controversy was the debate which followed the appointment of an archpriest by Pope Clement VIII to oversee the efforts of the Roman Catholic Church's missionary priests in England at the end of the sixteenth century.

William Clark was an English Roman Catholic priest and conspirator. He is remembered for his involvement in a plan to kidnap King James I of England, made together with another Catholic priest William Watson in the Bye Plot. He was executed at Winchester on 29 November 1603.

The Rev. George Brooke was an English aristocrat, executed for his part in two plots against the government of King James I.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sir Thomas Gascoigne, 2nd Baronet</span> English Baronet

Sir Thomas Gascoigne, 2nd Baronet (1596–1686) was an English Baronet, a prominent member of the Gascoigne family and a survivor of the Popish Plot, or as it was locally known "the Barnbow Plot".

Thomas Grey, 15th Baron Grey de Wilton was an English aristocrat, soldier and conspirator. He was convicted of involvement in the Bye Plot against James I of England.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oath of Allegiance of James I of England</span>

The Oath of Allegiance of 1606 was an oath requiring English Catholics to swear allegiance to James I over the Pope. It was adopted by Parliament the year after the Gunpowder Plot of 1605. The oath was proclaimed law on 22 June 1606, it was also called the Oath of Obedience. Whatever effect it had on the loyalty of his subjects, it caused an international controversy lasting a decade and more.

References

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.