Cetacean bycatch

Last updated
Group of Fraser's dolphins Fraser s group.jpg.jpeg
Group of Fraser's dolphins

Cetacean bycatch (or cetacean by-catch) is the accidental capture of non-target cetaceans such as dolphins, porpoises, and whales by commercial fisheries. [1] Bycatch can be caused by entanglement in fishing nets and lines, or direct capture by hooks or in trawl nets.

Contents

Cetacean bycatch is increasing in intensity and frequency. [2] This trend is likely to continue due to the pressures of human population growth on the environment, the growing popularity of seafood, and the commercialization of deep-sea fishing as operations expand into waters which were previously protected. These commercial fishing vessels come into both direct and indirect contact with cetaceans. An example of direct contact is the physical contact of cetaceans with fishing nets. Indirect contact occurs through marine food chains, which are destabilized by the commercial fishermen severely reducing local fish populations that cetaceans rely on for food. In commercial fishing practices, cetaceans are captured as bycatch but then retained because of their value as food or bait. [3]

A Dall's porpoise caught in a fishing net Entangled porpoise.jpg
A Dall's porpoise caught in a fishing net

Generally, cetacean bycatch is increasing. Most of the world's cetacean bycatch occurs in gillnet fisheries. [3] The mean annual bycatch in the U.S. alone from 1990 to 1999 was 6,215 marine mammals, with dolphins and porpoises being the primary cetaceans caught in gillnets. [3] Based on global bycatch observation of U.S. fisheries, an estimated 653,365 marine mammals, comprising 307,753 cetaceans and 345,611 pinnipeds were caught from 1990 to 1994. [3]

While gillnets are a principal concern, other types of nets also pose a problem: trawl nets, purse seines, beach seines, longline gear, and driftnets. Driftnets are known for high rates of bycatch and they affect all cetaceans and other marine species. [4] They are fatal for small toothed whales (Odontocetes) and sperm whales, as well as other marine vertebrates such as sharks, sea birds and sea turtles. Many fisheries routinely use driftnets exceeding the EU size limit of 2.5 km/boat. [5] This illegal drift-netting is a major issue, especially in important feeding and breeding grounds for cetaceans.

The tuna industry has achieved successes in reversing cetacean bycatch trends. International recognition of the problem of cetacean bycatch in tuna fishing led to the Agreement on the International Dolphin Conservation Program in 1999 and overall there has been a dramatic reduction in death rates. [6] In particular, dolphin bycatch in tuna fishing in the East Tropical Pacific has dropped from 500,000 per year in 1970 to 100,000 per year in 1990, to 3,000 per year in 1999, and to 1,000 per year in 2006. [7]

A shark culling program in Queensland, which has killed roughly 50,000 sharks since 1962, has also killed thousands of dolphins as bycatch. [8] [9] "Shark control" programs in both Queensland and New South Wales use shark nets and drum lines, which entangle and kill dolphins. [10] Queensland's "shark control" program has killed more than 1,000 dolphins in recent years, [9] and at least 32 dolphins have been killed in Queensland since 2014. [11] A shark culling program in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa has killed at least 2,310 dolphins. [12]

Cetaceans at risk

Bycatch is recognized as a primary threat to all cetaceans. The following cetaceans are at high risk for entanglement in gillnets:

Atlantic humpback dolphins

The Atlantic humpback dolphin (Sousa teuszii) is endemic to West Africa. Several stocks have been identified with numbers ranging from tens to a few hundred. [13] Abundance estimates are lacking. Gaps in the species range and hence distribution are evident. Bycatch is only documented in a few West African countries. Surveys and evaluations need to be conducted to determine the presence/absence of humpback dolphins in their historical range. Conservation measures need to be implemented to save this species. Because many people live off the sea, it is not feasible to have complete gillnet closures. Some areas may be designated as off-limits to gillnet fisheries. Eco-tourism may be implemented successfully because of high species diversity. [13]

Baleen whales

North Atlantic right whale mother and calf Eubalaena glacialis with calf.jpg
North Atlantic right whale mother and calf

Baleen whales (Mysticeti) are often taken in gill-nets and in fisheries that use vertical lines to mark traps and pots. [3] Large cetaceans such as humpback and right whales may carry off gear after entanglement. This explains the large scars borne by whales along the U.S. Atlantic coast. [14] Analyses show that 50-70% of Gulf of Maine humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) and North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) have been entangled at least once in their lifetime. [3] The North Atlantic right whale is one of the most endangered large cetaceans; only 300-350 individuals remain. [15] Minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) are also at risk.

Burmeister's porpoises

The Burmeister's porpoise (Phocoena spinipinnis) is one of three cetaceans that are most often bycaught in Peru and Chile. [13] Several thousand porpoises are caught each year in Peru alone. [13] Bycatch is a frequent occurrence for this species because of the inability to detect them in the water. Surveys have shown that bycatch remains a concern in that area today, and it is unknown whether the population is declining. [13] Reliable data, conservation measures, and public awareness are all lacking. These porpoises are cryptic, making surveying a challenge. [13] It is also difficult to estimate the extent of the bycatch, because the sale of porpoise meat is no longer available at markets.

Commerson's dolphins

A Commerson's dolphin in an aquarium Commdolph01.jpg
A Commerson's dolphin in an aquarium

The expanding trawl fisheries devastated the Commerson's dolphin (Cephalorhynchus commersonii) populations in Patagonia. Trawl fisheries greatly expanded for twenty years until they crashed in 1997. [13] Pelagic squid fisheries took over, which use pelagic trawls that are harmful to both dusky, short-beaked common dolphins and Commerson's dolphins. There are approximately 21,000 Commerson's dolphins remaining today. [13] Two stocks have been identified in the population, but genetic information and bycatch levels are unknown. With anchovy fisheries expanding, it is imperative to assess the Commerson's dolphin population before these fisheries grow. The seasonal operation of in-shore gillnet fisheries are known to involve bycatch of cetaceans. Presently, there are no known estimates of gillnet bycatch. The bycatch problem in Argentina is political in nature. [13] Improvements in fishing technology, public awareness, and a large-scale survey of the impact of bycatch on Commerson's dolphin populations are essential.

La Plata dolphins

The La Plata or Franciscana dolphin (Pontoporia blainvillei) is the most threatened small cetacean in the southwest Atlantic Ocean due to bycatch. [13] They are only found in the coastal waters of Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay. [15] This species has been divided into four ranges (FMU's: Franciscana Management Units) for management and conservation purposes. These populations are genetically different. Mortality rates are 1.6% for FMU 4 and 3.3% for FMU 3, but it is unknown whether these estimates are accurate. [13] Aerial surveys have proven inconclusive so far as to the population numbers of franciscanas. To rectify this situation, more surveys are needed as well as political commitment, awareness campaigns, and bycatch mitigation techniques.

Harbour porpoises

There is substantial incidental catches in fishing operations. [16] Often, the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) is killed by incidental bycatch (10, 11, 12). Gillnets pose a serious threat to the harbour porpoise as they are extremely susceptible to entanglement. [17] A study by Caswell et al. [18] in the western North Atlantic combined the mean annual rate of increase of the harbour porpoise with the uncertainty of incidental mortality and population size. It was found that the incidental mortality exceeds critical values, thus showing bycatch is a significant threat to the harbour porpoise. [18] Harbour porpoises become entangled in nets due to their inability to detect the nets before collision. [19] In 2001, 80 harbour porpoises were killed in salmon gillnet fisheries in British Columbia, Canada.

Hector's and Maui's dolphins

Hector's dolphins have a unique rounded dorsal fin. Hectors Dolphin.jpg
Hector's dolphins have a unique rounded dorsal fin.

In New Zealand, these dolphins have a high rate of entanglement. Hector's dolphin (Cephalorhynchus hectori) is endemic to the coastal waters of New Zealand and there are about 7,400 in abundance. [15] A small population of Hector's dolphins is isolated on the west coast of the island and have been declared a subspecies called Maui's dolphin. Maui's dolphins (Cephalorhynchus hectori maui) are often caught in set nets and pair trawlers resulting in less than 100 left in the wild. [15] For protection, a section of the dolphin's range on the west coast has been closed to gillnet fisheries.

Indo-Pacific humpback and bottlenose dolphins

Drift and bottom-set gillnets are the biggest conservation threat to these dolphins in the Indian Ocean. There have only been assessments in some areas, such as Zanzibar. Hunting, until 1996, reduced the population and contributed to its decline. Now hunting has been replaced with eco-tourism. It was estimated in 2001 that there are 161 bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) and 71 Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin (Sousa chinensis) remaining based on photo-identification mark-recapture techniques. [13] A study revealed over 160 incidences of bycatch since 2000. Approximately 30% of bycatch is in drift and bottom-set gillnets. [13] Mortality is about 8% and 5.6% for bottlenose and humpback dolphins, respectively . [13] The mitigation of bycatch is imperative for these species and for eco-tourism.

Irrawaddy dolphins

Irrawaddy dolphin Irrawaddy dolphin-Orcaella brevirostris by 2eight.jpg
Irrawaddy dolphin

Based on a survey in 2001, fewer than 70 Irrawaddy dolphins (Orcaella brevirostris) remain in the upper region of the Malampaya Sound in the Philippines and only 69 individuals in the Mekong River. [13] They have been severely impacted by lift nets and crab gear, thus critically endangered. It is estimated that mortality from bycatch may be greater than 4.5% in Malampaya Sound and 5.8% in the Mekong River. [13] The population is declining dramatically. Current bycatch levels are unsustainable, and bycatch reduction measures, as well as long-term systematic monitoring, are urgently required. The elimination of gillnets from areas of high use is needed, and economic incentives need to be provided to the local people.

Spinner and Fraser's dolphins

Spinner dolphins Spinner dolphins.jpg
Spinner dolphins

In the Philippines, tuna driftnet fisheries have a substantial impact on the populations. One tuna fishery alone kills 400 spinner dolphins (Stenella longirostris) and Fraser's dolphins (Lagenodelphis hosei) each year. [13] Round-haul nets are an even greater concern with a bycatch of up to 3000 dolphins per year. [13] Dolphins that are bycaught often end up as shark bait for longline fisheries. There is not enough data to conclude the total bycatch for the Philippines. Initial assessment indicates that bycatch is not sustainable. Monitoring of dolphin populations and fisheries is urgently needed.

Yangtze River dolphins and finless porpoises

Illustration of a Baiji dolphin. Lipotes vexillifer.png
Illustration of a Baiji dolphin.

The Yangtze River or Baiji dolphin (Lipotes vexillifer) is one of the most endangered cetaceans that is only found in the Yangtze River, China. A survey conducted in 1997 found only thirteen dolphins. [15] A later survey in 2006 found no individuals in their former range, and as such, the species was declared functionally extinct - the first cetacean to become functionally extinct primarily due to bycatch (among other factors). However, there have been various sightings since then. [20] [21] [22] [23] The Yangtze River finless porpoise (Neophocaena phocaenoides asiaeorientalis) also lives in the Yangtze River. Abundance has declined; there are fewer than 2000 porpoises left. [15] This may be due, in part, to the construction of the Three Gorges Dam, which covers a significant amount of the dolphin's natural habitat. Both species are often subject to entanglement in gillnets.

Vaquita

A vaquita surfacing. Vaquita2 Olson NOAA crop2.jpg
A vaquita surfacing.

The vaquita (Phocoena sinus) is the smallest and most endangered cetacean. Endemic to the upper Gulf of California in Mexico, they are killed in both gillnets and trawl nets from commercial fishing and poaching. The vaquita shares its habitat with the totoaba (Totoaba macdonaldi), a highly valued fish in black markets due to the perceived medicinal value of its swim bladder. [24] As of 2024, there are less than 8 individuals left in the Gulf of California, making the species functionally extinct similar to the baiji. [15] [25]

Mitigating bycatch

Acoustic deterrent devices

The use of acoustic alarms to mitigate by-catch and to protect aquaculture sites has been proposed. Acoustic deterrent devices, or pingers, have reduced the number of cetaceans caught in gill nets. Harbour porpoises have been effectively excluded from bottom-set gill nets during many experiments for instance in the Gulf of Maine, [26] along the Olympic Peninsula, [27] in the Bay of Fundy, [28] and in the North Sea. [29] All of these studies show up to a 90% decrease in harbour porpoise bycatch. Pingers work by producing a sound that is aversive to the cetaceans (20; 15). There has been a recent re-evaluation of the potential benefit of pingers, [30] and their use in other fisheries has expaneded due to their growing success. An experiment on the California drift gill net fishery demonstrated how acoustic pingers reduce marine mammal bycatch. [31] It showed that bycatch was significantly reduced for common dolphins and sea lions. Bycatch rates were also lower for other cetacean species, such as the Northern right whale dolphin, Pacific white-sided dolphin, Risso's dolphin, and Dall's porpoise. It is agreed upon that the more pingers on a net, the less bycatch. There was a 12-fold decrease in common dolphin entanglement using a net with 40 pingers. [31] However, the widespread use of pingers along coastlines effectively excludes cetaceans such as porpoises from their prime habitat and resources. [32] Cetaceans, extremely sensitive to noise, are effectively driven from their preferred coastal habitats by the use of these acoustic devices. In poorer quality habitats, harbour porpoises are subjected to increased competition for resources. This situation is recognized as range contraction, which can be a result of climate change, anthropogenic activity, or population decline. Large-scale range contractions are considered indicative of impending extinction. [33] A similar form of deterrent is noise pollution originating from vessel traffic.

Barium sulfate

A promising gillnet that is effective in reducing bycatch for harbor porpoises contains barium sulfate. These nets are detected at a greater distance than conventional nets because the barium sulfate reflects the cetaceans' echolocation signal, thus rendering the nets more detectable by these animals. Barium sulfate makes the nets stiffer if it is added at high concentration. All three factors - echo reflectivity, stiffness, and visibility - may be important in reducing bycatch. [34] [35] Echo reflectivity appears to depend on particle size, not density. The denser iron oxide produced no reduction in bycatch. Fish takes in the Bay of Fundy were normal, except for haddock takes, which were down by 3-5%. [36] The advantage of this approach is that it is passive and thus does not require batteries, and there is no "dinner bell" effect. The potential advantage of these nets is greatest in the artisanal fishery. NOAA is planning further testing to verify the effectiveness of the nets.

Fishing regulations and management

Management and regulation are severely lacking in many fisheries today. Management measures are urgently needed to monitor fisheries (and illegal fisheries) to protect cetaceans. Efforts to document bycatch should focus on gill-net fisheries, because cetaceans are more likely to be caught in gill-nets. Conservation efforts should be directed to areas where marine mammal bycatch is high but where no infrastructure exists to assess the impact. [3] In general, there is a lack of reporting on a global scale of cetacean bycatch.

In the U.S., the Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits the use and sale of marine mammals captured by commercial fisheries. [3] Similar legislations prohibit the use and sale of marine mammals in other countries. A marine mammal mortality monitoring program for commercial fisheries is operating in the U.S., where "Take Reduction Teams" observe the extent of bycatch and then formulate strategies to reduce bycatch, with "Take Reduction Plans" put into place. [3]

Temporary closure

As another potential mitigation measure, temporary closure of fisheries during the short periods of the year when cetaceans are migrating through the area would significantly decrease bycatch. [37]

Observers on boat

Another mitigation measure is to use observers on fishing vessels to spot cetaceans in the water in order to avoid bycatch. [38]

In the U.S.

Some programs like Earth Island Institute's Dolphin Safe Label certification claim to require certification from onboard observers. However, the only fishery in the world where independent scientific observers certify whether a dolphin has been harmed is the Eastern Tropical Pacific, home to the AIDCP Treaty program. For all other tuna fisheries of the world, the efficacy of onboard observer certification has come under increasing scrutiny as such programs have proven indefensible or unmanageable: [39]

In an interview with Radio Australia last year, Mark Palmer of EII confirmed that it is mostly the case that EII monitors do not go on board of the vessels, and their organization does not have the kind of resources to put observers on the "many thousands" of ships that are out there catching tuna. [40]

Additionally, environmental groups have criticized Earth Island Institute's support of U.S. policies that do not require independent, on-board observation and instead only rely on self-certification by fishing captains. Even if there is a requirement of independent observers, the lack of uniformity in tracing and verifying certifications in different countries implies that non-certified products can still become certified if they are taken to a different port. [41]

Other ways of mitigating bycatch

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Porpoise</span> Small cetacean of the family Phocoenidae

Porpoises are small dolphin-like cetaceans classified under the family Phocoenidae. Although similar in appearance to dolphins, they are more closely related to narwhals and belugas than to the true dolphins. There are eight extant species of porpoise, all among the smallest of the toothed whales. Porpoises are distinguished from dolphins by their flattened, spade-shaped teeth distinct from the conical teeth of dolphins, and lack of a pronounced beak, although some dolphins also lack a pronounced beak. Porpoises, and other cetaceans, belong to the clade Cetartiodactyla with even-toed ungulates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spectacled porpoise</span> Species of mammal

The spectacled porpoise is a small to midsize porpoise indigenous to the Southern Ocean. It is one of the most poorly studied cetaceans, partly due to its remote range in the Southern Ocean. What little is known about this porpoise species has been gathered mainly from stranded individuals, and a few observations of living animals made at sea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Longline fishing</span> Commercial fishing technique

Longline fishing, or longlining, is a commercial fishing angling technique that uses a long main line with baited hooks attached at intervals via short branch lines called snoods or gangions. A snood is attached to the main line using a clip or swivel, with the hook at the other end. Longlines are classified mainly by where they are placed in the water column. This can be at the surface or at the bottom. Lines can also be set by means of an anchor, or left to drift. Hundreds or even thousands of baited hooks can hang from a single line. This can lead to many deaths of different marine species. Longliners – fishing vessels rigged for longlining – commonly target swordfish, tuna, halibut, sablefish and many other species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bycatch</span> Fish or other marine species that is caught unintentionally

Bycatch, in the fishing industry, is a fish or other marine species that is caught unintentionally while fishing for specific species or sizes of wildlife. Bycatch is either the wrong species, the wrong sex, or is undersized or juveniles of the target species. The term "bycatch" is also sometimes used for untargeted catch in other forms of animal harvesting or collecting. Non-marine species that are caught but regarded as generally "undesirable" are referred to as rough fish or coarse fish.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hubbs' beaked whale</span> Species of mammal

Hubbs' beaked whale was initially thought to be an Andrews' beaked whale when discovered by ichthyologist Carl Hubbs; however, it was named in his honor when it was discovered to be a new species. This species has the typical dentition found in the genus, but its main outstanding features are a white "cap" on the head and very extensive scarring. The species is known from 31 strandings, a few at-sea sightings, and observations of two stranded whales that were kept in captivity for 16–25 days.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harbour porpoise</span> Species of mammal

The harbour porpoise is one of eight extant species of porpoise. It is one of the smallest species of cetacean. As its name implies, it stays close to coastal areas or river estuaries, and as such, is the most familiar porpoise to whale watchers. This porpoise often ventures up rivers, and has been seen hundreds of kilometres from the sea. The harbour porpoise may be polytypic, with geographically distinct populations representing distinct races: P. p. phocoena in the North Atlantic and West Africa, P. p. relicta in the Black Sea and Sea of Azov, an unnamed population in the northwestern Pacific and P. p. vomerina in the northeastern Pacific.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vaquita</span> Species of porpoise

The vaquita is a species of porpoise endemic to the northern end of the Gulf of California in Baja California, Mexico. Reaching a maximum body length of 150 cm (4.9 ft) (females) or 140 cm (4.6 ft) (males), it is the smallest of all living cetaceans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Burmeister's porpoise</span> Species of marine mammal

Burmeister's porpoise is a species of porpoise endemic to the coast of South America. It was first described by Hermann Burmeister, for whom the species is named, in 1865.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dall's porpoise</span> Species of porpoise endemic to the North Pacific

Dall's porpoise is a species of porpoise endemic to the North Pacific. It is the largest of porpoises and the only member of the genus Phocoenoides. The species is named after American naturalist W. H. Dall.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hector's dolphin</span> Species of mammal

Hector's dolphin is one of four dolphin species belonging to the genus Cephalorhynchus. Hector's dolphin is the only cetacean endemic to New Zealand, and comprises two subspecies: C. h. hectori, the more numerous subspecies, also referred to as South Island Hector's dolphin; and the critically endangered Māui dolphin, found off the West Coast of the North Island.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphin</span> Species of mammal

The Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphin is a species of bottlenose dolphin. This dolphin grows to 2.6 m (8.5 ft) long, and weighs up to 230 kg (510 lb). It lives in the waters around India, northern Australia, South China, the Red Sea, and the eastern coast of Africa. Its back is dark grey and its belly is lighter grey or nearly white with grey spots.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Melon-headed whale</span> Species of mammal

The melon-headed whale, also known less commonly as the electra dolphin, little killer whale, or many-toothed blackfish, is a toothed whale of the oceanic dolphin family (Delphinidae). The common name is derived from the head shape. Melon-headed whales are widely distributed throughout deep tropical and subtropical waters worldwide, but they are rarely encountered at sea. They are found near shore mostly around oceanic islands, such as Hawaii, French Polynesia, and the Philippines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northern right whale dolphin</span> Species of mammal

The northern right whale dolphin is a small, slender species of cetacean found in the cold and temperate waters of the North Pacific Ocean. Lacking a dorsal fin, and appearing superficially porpoise-like, it is one of the two species of right whale dolphin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pantropical spotted dolphin</span> Species of mammal

The pantropical spotted dolphin is a species of dolphin found in all the world's temperate and tropical oceans. The species was beginning to come under threat due to the killing of millions of individuals in tuna purse seines. In the 1980s, the rise of "dolphin-friendly" tuna capture methods saved millions of the species in the eastern Pacific Ocean and it is now one of the most abundant dolphin species in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shark net</span> A submerged barrier that protects swimmers from shark attacks

A shark net is a submerged section of gillnets placed at beaches designed to intercept large marine animals including sharks, with the aim to reduce the likelihood of shark attacks on swimmers. Shark nets used are gillnets which is a wall of netting that hangs in the water and captures the marine animals by entanglement, however only around 10% of catch is the intended target shark species. The nets in Queensland, Australia, are typically 186m long, set at a depth of 6m, have a mesh size of 500mm and are designed to catch sharks longer than 2m in length. The nets in New South Wales, Australia, are typically 150m long, set on the sea floor, extending approximately 6m up the water column, are designed to catch sharks longer than 2m in length. Shark nets do not create an exclusion zone between sharks and humans, and are not to be confused with shark barriers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gillnetting</span> Type of fishing net

Gillnetting is a fishing method that uses gillnets: vertical panels of netting that hang from a line with regularly spaced floaters that hold the line on the surface of the water. The floats are sometimes called "corks" and the line with corks is generally referred to as a "cork line." The line along the bottom of the panels is generally weighted. Traditionally this line has been weighted with lead and may be referred to as "lead line." A gillnet is normally set in a straight line. Gillnets can be characterized by mesh size, as well as colour and type of filament from which they are made. Fish may be caught by gillnets in three ways:

  1. Wedged – held by the mesh around the body.
  2. Gilled – held by mesh slipping behind the opercula.
  3. Tangled – held by teeth, spines, maxillaries, or other protrusions without the body penetrating the mesh.
<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drift netting</span> Fishing technique

Drift netting is a fishing technique where nets, called drift nets, hang vertically in the water column without being anchored to the bottom. The nets are kept vertical in the water by floats attached to a rope along the top of the net and weights attached to another rope along the bottom of the net. Drift nets generally rely on the entanglement properties of loosely affixed netting. Folds of loose netting, much like a window drapery, snag on a fish's tail and fins and wrap the fish up in loose netting as it struggles to escape. However, the nets can also function as gill nets if fish are captured when their gills get stuck in the net. The size of the mesh varies depending on the fish being targeted. These nets usually target schools of pelagic fish.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans of the Baltic, North East Atlantic, Irish and North Seas</span> 1991 conservation agreement

Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans of the Baltic, North East Atlantic, Irish and North Seas, often abbreviated to ASCOBANS, is a regional agreement on the protection of small cetaceans that was concluded as the Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans of the Baltic and North Seas under the auspices of the UNEP Convention on Migratory Species, or Bonn Convention, in September 1991 and came into force in March 1994. In February 2008, an extension of the agreement area came into force which changed the name to “Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans of the Baltic, North East Atlantic, Irish and North Seas”. ASCOBANS covers all species of toothed whales (Odontoceti) in the Agreement Area, with the exception of the sperm whale.

Dolphin-safe labels are used to denote compliance with laws or policies designed to minimize dolphin fatalities during fishing for tuna destined for canning.

The Bottlenose Dolphin Research Institute (BDRI) is a research and educational centre dedicated to the understanding and conservation of cetaceans and the marine environment in which they live. The Institute's BDRI center was founded by the biologist Bruno Díaz López in Sardinia, Italy in 2005. In 2014, the BDRI opened a new facility in Galicia, Spain.

References

  1. ↑ Alverson et al. (1994)
  2. ↑ Demaster et al. (2001)
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Read et al. (2006)
  4. ↑ Silvani et al. (1999)
  5. ↑ Miragliuolo et al. (2002)
  6. ↑ "International Affairs | NOAA Fisheries". 25 August 2021.
  7. ↑ "The Tuna-Dolphin Issue". 22 November 2021.
  8. ↑ https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/animals/aussie-shark-population-is-staggering-decline/news-story/49e910c828b6e2b735d1c68e6b2c956e Aussie shark population in staggering decline. Rhian Deutrom. December 14, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2018.
  9. 1 2 http://www.afd.org.au/news-articles/queenslands-shark-control-program-has-snagged-84000-animals Action for Dolphins. Queensland’s Shark Control Program Has Snagged 84,000 Animals. Thom Mitchell. November 20, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2018.
  10. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20181002102324/https://www.marineconservation.org.au/pages/shark-culling.html "Shark Culling". marineconservation.org.au. Archived from the original on 2018-10-02. Retrieved December 26, 2018.
  11. ↑ https://hsi.org.au/blog/separating-fact-from-fiction-in-qlds-shark-culling-program Separating fact from fiction in QLD’s shark culling program. Nicola Beynon. October 19, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2018
  12. ↑ http://www.sharkangels.org/index.php/media/news/157-shark-nets "Shark Nets". sharkangels.org. Retrieved December 26, 2018.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Reeves et al. (2005)
  14. ↑ Knowlton (2003)
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 WWF (2004)
  16. ↑ Hammond et al. (2002)
  17. ↑ Jefferson & Curry (1994)
  18. 1 2 Caswell et al. (1998)
  19. ↑ Kastelein et al. (1999)
  20. ↑ ""Extinct" white-flag dolphin spotted in Yangtze River". 2009-07-09. Archived from the original on 2009-07-09. Retrieved 2024-09-16.
  21. ↑ Phillips, Tom (2016-10-11). "China's 'extinct' dolphin may have returned to Yangtze river, say conservationists". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2024-09-16.
  22. ↑ "The Search for the Baiji". The World of Chinese. Retrieved 2024-09-16.
  23. ↑ "中华白鱀豚功能性灭绝十年后疑似重现长江，科考队称拍到两头_绿政公署_澎湃新闻-The Paper". m.thepaper.cn. Retrieved 2024-09-16.
  24. ↑ Stickney • •, R. (2013-04-24). "Multi-Million Dollar Fish Bladder Factory Uncovered in Calexico". NBC 7 San Diego. Retrieved 2024-09-16.
  25. ↑ devon11 (2024-06-11). "Vaquita Survey 2024 - Executive Summary". Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. Retrieved 2024-09-16.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  26. ↑ Kraus et al. (1997)
  27. ↑ Gearin et al. (2000)
  28. ↑ Trippel et al. (2003)
  29. ↑ Larsen (1997)
  30. ↑ Reeves et al. (1996)
  31. 1 2 Barlow & Cameron (2003)
  32. ↑ Culik et al. (2001)
  33. ↑ Boughton et al. (2005)
  34. ↑ Mooney et al (2004)
  35. ↑ Mooney et al (2007)
  36. ↑ Trippel et al (2008)
  37. ↑ Murray et al.(2000)
  38. ↑ Animal Freedom (2008)
  39. ↑ "The fairy tale of US "dolphin safe" labeling False claims, unintended consequences" (PDF). July 1, 2012. Retrieved January 9, 2014.
  40. ↑ "EII On-board Observers, Ghosts?". July 1, 2012. Archived from the original on January 7, 2014. Retrieved January 9, 2014.
  41. ↑ "Trade Dispute With Mexico Over 'Dolphin-Safe' Tuna Heats Up". NPR.org. July 1, 2012. Archived from the original on 2014-01-07. Retrieved January 9, 2014.
  42. ↑ Gilman, E; Brothers, N; McPherson, G; Dalzell, P; et al. (2006). "Review of cetacean interactions with longline gear". Journal of Cetacean Research and Management. 8 (2): 215–223. doi: 10.47536/jcrm.v8i2.717 . S2CID   83811349.
  43. ↑ "Sustainable Seafood: Consumer Guides", World Wildlife Fund Global 2013
  44. ↑ "Seafood Watch" Archived January 19, 2013, at the Wayback Machine , Monterey Bay Aquarium 2013
  45. 1 2 3 Fishing Technology Service (2008)

General references

  • Alverson, DL, Freeburg, MH, Murawski, SA and JG Pope (1994). A global assessment of fisheries bycatch and discards. Fisheries Technical Paper. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. 339 pp.
  • Animal Freedom (2008) Cetacean Bycatch
  • Barlow, J & Cameron, GA (2003). Field experiments show that acoustic pingers reduce marine mammal bycatch in the Californian drift gill net fishery. Marine Mammal Science. 19: 265-283.
  • Boughton, DA, Fish, H, Pipal, K, Goin, J, Watson, F, Casagrande, J, and M Stoecker (2005). Contraction of the southern range limit for anadromous Oncorhynchus mykiss. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS. NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-380. U.S. Department of Commerce.
  • Caswell, H, Brault, S, Read, AJ, and TD Smith (1998). Harbour porpoise and fisheries: an uncertain analysis of incidental mortality. Ecological Applications. 8(4): 1226–1238.
  • Culik, BM, Koschinski, S, Tregenza, N, and GM Ellis (2001). Reactions of harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena and herring Clupea harengus to acoustic alarms. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 211: 155-260.
  • Demaster, DJ, Fowler, CW, Perry, SL, and ME Richlen (2001). Predation and competition: the impact of fisheries on marine mammal populations over the next one hundred years. Journal of Mammalogy. 82: 641-651.
  • Fishing Technology Service (2008) Managing bycatch and reducing discards: Taking it to the next level
  • Gearin, PJ, Gosho, ME, Laake, JL, Cooke, L, DeLong, R, and KM Hughes (2000). Experimental testing of acoustic alarms (pingers) to reduce bycatch of harbor porpoise, Phocoena phocoena, in the state of Washington. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management. 2:1-9.
  • Hammond, PS, Berggren, P, Benke, H, Borchers, DL, Collet, A, Heide-Jorgensen, MP, Heimlich, S, Hiby, AR, Leopold, MF, and N Oien (2002). Abundance of harbour porpoise and other cetaceans in the North Sea and adjacent waters. Journal of Applied Ecology. 39: 361-376.
  • Jefferson, TA and Curry, BE (1994). A global review of porpoise (Cetacea: Phocoenidae) mortality in gill nets. Biological Conservation. 67(2): 167-183.
  • Kastelein, RA, Au, WWL, and de Haan, D (1999). Detection distances of bottom-set gillnets by harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) and bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncates). Marine Environmental Research. 49(4): 359-375.
  • Knowlton, AR et al. (2003). Analysis of scarring on North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis): monitoring rates of entanglement interaction. Final report. Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.
  • Kraus, S, Read, AJ, Solow, A, Baldwin, K, Spradlin, T, Anderson, E, and J Williamson (1997). Acoustic alarms reduce porpoise mortality. Nature. 388:525.
  • Larsen, F (1997). Effekten af akustiske alarmer pa bifangst as marsvin i garn. Report number 44-97 (unpublished). Available from the Danish Institute for Fisheries Research, Jaegersborgvei 64-66, DK- 2800 kg. Lyngby, Denmark.
  • Miragliuolo, A, Mussi, B, and G Bearzi (2002). Observations of driftnetting off the island of Ischia, Italy, with indirect evidence of dolphin bycatch. European Cetacean Research. 4pp.
  • Monterey Bay Aquarium (2013) Seafood Watch Archived 2013-02-25 at the Wayback Machine
  • Mooney, TA; Nachtigall, P; Au, WWL (2004). "Target strength of a nylon monofilament and an acoustically enhanced gillnet: predictions of biosonar detection ranges". Aquatic Mammals. 30 (2): 220–26. doi:10.1578/AM.30.2.2004.220.
  • Mooney, TA, Au, WWL, Nachtigall, P, and Trippel, EA (2007). "Acoustic and stiffness properties of gillnets as they relate to marine mammal bycatch." ICES J. Mar. Sci., 64: 1324–32.
  • Murray, KT, Read, AJ, and AR Solow. 2000. The use of time/area closures to reduce bycatches of harbour porpoises: lessons from the Gulf of Maine sink gillnet fishery. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management. 2(2): 135-141.
  • Read, AJ, Drinker, P, and S Northridge (2006). Bycatch of marine mammals in the U.S. and Global Fisheries. Conservation Biology. 20(1): 163-169.
  • Reeves, RR, Hofman, RJ, Silber, GK, and D Wilkinson (1996). Acoustic deterrence of harmful marine mammal-fishery interactions. Proceedings of a workshop held in Seattle, Washington, 20–22 March 1996. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum, NMFS-OPR-10 (unpublished). 70 pp. Available from the NMFS Office of Protected Resources, 1335 East/ West Highway, Silver Springs, MD. 20910, USA.
  • Reeves, RR, Berggren, P, Crespo, EA, Gales, N, Northridge, SP, Sciara, GND, Perrin, WF, Read, AJ, Rogan, E, Smith, BD, and KV Waerebeek (2005). Global priorities for reduction of cetacean bycatch. WWF document. 27 pp.
  • Silvani, L, Gazo, JM, and A Aguilar (1999). Spanish driftnet fishing and incidental catches in the western Mediterranean. Biological Conservation. 90: 79-85.
  • Trippel, EA, Strong, MB, Terhune, JM, and JD Conway (1999). "Mitigation of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) by-catch in the gillnet fishery in the lower Bay of Fundy." Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 56: 113-123.
  • Trippel, EA, Holy, NL, and Shepperd, TD, (2008). "Barium sulphate modified fishing gear as a mitigative measure for cetacean incidental mortalities." J. Cetacean Res. Manage., 10(3):235–246.
  • World Wildlife Fund Global (2013). Sustainable Seafood: Consumer Guides

Further reading

External videos
Nuvola apps kaboodle.svg Saving a humpback whale from fisherman's nets – YouTube
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.