LGBT rights in Belize

Last updated

LGBT rights in Belize
Bh large locator.png
Belize
Status Legal since 2016 [1]
Gender identity No
Military No
Discrimination protections Sexual orientation protections [2]
Family rights
Recognition of relationships No recognition of same-sex couples
Adoption No

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in Belize face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT citizens, although attitudes have been changing in recent years. Same-sex sexual activity was decriminalized in Belize in 2016, when the Supreme Court declared Belize's anti-sodomy law unconstitutional. Belize's constitution prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, which Belizean courts have interpreted to include sexual orientation. [3] [4]

Contents

Belize held its first Pride Week in August 2017. Activities raising awareness and acceptance were hosted throughout the country. [5]

Legality of same-sex sexual activity

According to Section 53 of the Belize Criminal Code, "Every person who has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any person ... shall be liable to imprisonment for 10 years." [6] It was argued in the challenge to Section 53 of the Criminal Code that homosexuality per se is not illegal, but any sexual act which is not the "sexual congress of a phallus inserted into a vagina" is illegal, including oral sex, anal sex between heterosexual or homosexual persons, masturbation, etc. [7] Section 53 was overturned on 10 August 2016 as a violation of the Constitution of Belize. [1]

While sodomy bans in The Bahamas were removed by the Parliament in 1991 and bans in the British Overseas Territories were overturned in 2000 by a UK Order in Council, Belize's sodomy ban was the first one in a former British colony in the Caribbean to be judicially overturned. [8] [9] It was also the last sodomy ban in Central America to be struck down. [10]

Caleb Orozco v. Attorney General of Belize

Caleb Orozco successfully argued in court that Belize's sodomy ban was unconstitutional. Caleb Orozco.jpg
Caleb Orozco successfully argued in court that Belize's sodomy ban was unconstitutional.

In September 2010, the United Belize Advocacy Movement (UNIBAM) and its executive director Caleb Orozco jointly filed a case in the Supreme Court of Judicature of Belize challenging the constitutionality of Belize's anti-sodomy law with the support of the International Commission of Jurists, the Commonwealth Lawyers' Association, and the Human Dignity Trust.

Counsel for the Church Interested Parties (CIP) (consisting of the Roman Catholic Church, the Belize Church of England Corporate Body, and the Evangelical Association of Churches) argued in January 2012 that UNIBAM had no standing to bring the case because, as an organization, it has no constitutionally guaranteed rights. Relying on Section 20 of the Belize Constitution, the court sided with CIP on 27 April 2012 and struck out UNIBAM as a claimant. [11] In December 2012, Justice Arana granted UNIBAM "interested party" status, which was the same status given to CIP. [12]

The case was heard by the Supreme Court of Judicature in May 2013, [13] amid violence and death threats received by LGBT activists. [14] On 10 August 2016, Chief Justice Kenneth Benjamin ruled that Section 53 of the Criminal Code of Belize contravened constitutional protections of equality, dignity and personal privacy. [1] [15] Orozco prevailed on all points in the decision, in which Benjamin reiterated that the court was required to make a legal ruling rather than a moral judgment. Benjamin ordered that the Criminal Code be amended with the insertion of the phrase "This section shall not apply to consensual sexual acts between adults." [16] [17] He went on to state that the Belizean Constitution must be consistent with international interpretations and clarified that "sex" as mentioned in Section 16(3) of the Constitution, includes sexual orientation. [18]

Homosexuality laws in Central America and the Caribbean Islands. .mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{} Same-sex marriage Other type of partnership Unregistered cohabitation Country subject to IACHR ruling No recognition of same-sex couples Constitution limits marriage to opposite-sex couples Same-sex sexual activity illegal but law not enforced .mw-parser-output .hlist dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul{margin:0;padding:0}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt,.mw-parser-output .hlist li{margin:0;display:inline}.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul ul{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .hlist .mw-empty-li{display:none}.mw-parser-output .hlist dt::after{content:": "}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li::after{content:" * ";font-weight:bold}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li:last-child::after{content:none}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li li:first-child::before{content:" (";font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd li:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt li:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li li:last-child::after{content:")";font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol{counter-reset:listitem}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol>li{counter-increment:listitem}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol>li::before{content:" "counter(listitem)"\a0 "}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd ol>li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt ol>li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li ol>li:first-child::before{content:" ("counter(listitem)"\a0 "} .mw-parser-output .navbar{display:inline;font-size:88%;font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .navbar-collapse{float:left;text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .navbar-boxtext{word-spacing:0}.mw-parser-output .navbar ul{display:inline-block;white-space:nowrap;line-height:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::before{margin-right:-0.125em;content:"[ "}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::after{margin-left:-0.125em;content:" ]"}.mw-parser-output .navbar li{word-spacing:-0.125em}.mw-parser-output .navbar a>span,.mw-parser-output .navbar a>abbr{text-decoration:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-mini abbr{font-variant:small-caps;border-bottom:none;text-decoration:none;cursor:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-full{font-size:114%;margin:0 7em}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-mini{font-size:114%;margin:0 4em} v t e Homosexuality laws in Central America and the Caribbean Islands.svg
Homosexuality laws in Central America and the Caribbean Islands.
  Same-sex marriage
  Other type of partnership
  Unregistered cohabitation
  Country subject to IACHR ruling
  No recognition of same-sex couples
  Constitution limits marriage to opposite-sex couples
  Same-sex sexual activity illegal but law not enforced

On 17 August 2016, the Government announced they would not appeal the ruling to the Caribbean Court of Justice, but that other interested parties may appeal. [19] After meeting with religious leaders on September 9, the Government reversed course and announced they would make a partial appeal of the ruling, specifically appealing the declaration that the Constitution prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation. [20] Interested parties filed to appeal the ruling on September 16. [21] On 4 October 2016, the National Evangelical Association of Belize's appeal of the case was rejected by the Chief Justice because the organization was not an original interested party to the case. [22] In March 2018, the Catholic Church in Belize officially withdrew from the appeal, leaving the Government of Belize as the sole appellant to the decision on Section 53. [23] With the Catholic Church withdrawal, recognition was given that sexual relations between consenting adults was fully legalized in Belize, as the partial appeal by the Government concerned only whether the anti-discrimination clause of the Constitution which referred to sex could be interpreted to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [24]

On 29 October 2018, the appellate court heard full arguments from both sides. The position of Orozco's legal team was that the appeal should be dismissed, as by the state having no objection to declaring section 53 of the Criminal Code unconstitutional, the partial appeal on discrimination could have no effect. Westmin James called the appeal "academic" because the Constitution protects the LGBT community from discrimination, meaning that even if that portion of the ruling was overturned the Government could not discriminate against a specific segment of the population. Nigel Hawke, the Solicitor General of Belize, argued that the ruling was a judicial overreach to re-define the constitutional protections afforded to non-discrimination on the basis of "sex" to extend to "sexual orientation". Lisa Shoman, countered the argument, stating: "The judges are the guardians of what the constitution means, it's their job to interpret the constitution". Citing that international treaty obligations Belize had entered into are typically used to inform interpretation of domestic law, she refuted the claim of overreach. Judgment on the appeal was reserved pending further deliberation. [25] [26]

On 30 December 2019, the Appeals Court upheld the unconstitutionality of Section 53 and the expansion of protections in the Constitution against discrimination to include sexual orientation and freedom of expression to include sexual expression. [27] [28]

Church opposition to decriminalisation

In response to the case filed by UNIBAM and Caleb Orozco, Catholic and the Protestant churches reacted negatively, saying that same-sex marriage would be next. [29] [30] On 3 December 2011, the Council of Churches organized a "Take a Stand" rally to oppose the UNIBAM case. [31]

The Belizean Council of Churches held a "Belize Action/Family Forum" rally on 23 November 2011 to express its opposition to decriminalization as part of "an orchestrated plan of demonic darkness to dethrone God from our Constitution and open massive gateways to demonic influence and destruction that will affect generation after generation to come." [29] [32]

Pressure from the United States

In December 2011, United States President Barack Obama criticised nations that persecute homosexuals. [33] In response, Belizean Prime Minister Dean Barrow reiterated that Belize would not change its laws. [34] He argued that the issue is one for Belize to deal with and if the U.S. wanted to punish states by removing foreign aid for continuing such practice, then "they will have to cut off their aid". [34]

Immigration ban

Under Section 5(1) of the Immigration Act, "the following persons are prohibited immigrants – ... (e) any prostitute or homosexual or any person who may be living on or receiving or may have been living on or receiving the proceeds of prostitution or homosexual behaviour". [35]

A challenge by Jamaican activist Maurice Tomlinson was filed in 2013 to the immigration ban in both Trinidad and Tobago and Belize. Tomlinson asked Jamaica, his home country, to insist that the travel bans of these countries be removed based on CARICOM provisions for free movement of citizens of member countries. Jamaica refused, and Tomlinson petitioned the Caribbean Court of Justice asking leave to file the case with them directly. [36] In May 2014, Tomlinson was granted leave to challenge the immigration laws of both countries. [37] In October 2014, CARICOM joined the case as an interested party supporting Tomlinson's arguments. [38] On 18 March 2015, the challenge was heard with allegations that the immigration bans abridge the rights of free movement for Caribbean citizens contained in the Treaty of Chaguaramas. [39] [40] On 10 June 2016, the CCJ ruled that neither Trinidad and Tobago nor Belize had violated Tomlinson's freedom of movement, dismissing his case. As clarification, the judgment noted that neither state can ban homosexuals from CARICOM countries from entering their countries due to their treaty obligations, "notwithstanding their laws that ban the entry of gays". [41] During the trial, Belize contended that Section 5(1) of the Immigration Act applied only to those offering sexual services for financial gain, and that it does not interpret or enforce the act as a blanket prohibition against homosexual immigrants. [42]

Discrimination protections

On 10 August 2016, the Supreme Court ruled that Section 53 of the Belizean Criminal Code is unconstitutional (see above). Chief Justice Kenneth Benjamin also clarified that "sex" as mentioned in Section 16(3) of the Constitution, includes sexual orientation. Therefore, the Constitution of Belize prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [2]

In 1996, Minister of Foreign Affairs Dean Barrow, (who would later become Prime Minister), signed a UN multi-lateral treaty known as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). In 1993, the language of the treaty was interpreted by the UN Commission on Human Rights to include sexual preference in the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sex. According to Chief Justice Benjamin, by signing the treaty, Belize tacitly agreed to this interpretation, and the Constitution of Belize must be interpreted in the same light. [2]

In 2018, during a Universal Periodic Review (UPR), Belize accepted 15 LGBT-related recommendations, from addressing discrimination, violence and hate crimes against LGBT people to ensuring that LGBT people have access to proper HIV treatment. The recommendations, mostly from developed nations (namely Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Spain, Ukraine, the United States, and Uruguay) called for legislative measures to prohibit discrimination in employment, housing and government services against LGBT people, reducing societal stigma through educational campaigns, training police officials to properly respond to violence, and taking concrete steps to ensure universal access to HIV treatment. [43]

Public opinion

In 2013, UNAIDS conducted a survey of 773 Belizeans, ages 18 to 64. The survey found that 34% consider themselves accepting of homosexuals, while another 34% consider themselves tolerant of homosexuals. [44] [45] Of all the Caribbean countries that were polled, Belize and Suriname had the highest percentage of acceptance for homosexuals. [45]

Living conditions

Since the August 2016 Supreme Court ruling, LGBT organisations have become more visible and active. Young LGBT Belizeans have also been inspired to come out. [46]

Tourism

Belize has long been a popular tourist destination for LGBT people. Many holiday resorts host LGBT events. San Pedro Town is considered to be the most gay-friendly destination for tourists in Belize. It has a thriving gay nightlife during the high season. Many businesses are openly owned and run by LGBT people in the town. [46]

In 2009, Kim Simplis Barrow, the wife of Prime Minister Dean Barrow, personally welcomed the arrival of a lesbian cruise ship, whose passengers then volunteered at a local children's hospital. [46]

Summary table

Same-sex sexual activity legal Yes check.svg (Since 2016)
Equal age of consent (16) Yes check.svg (Since 2016)
Anti-discrimination laws in employment Yes check.svg (Since 2016)
Anti-discrimination laws in the provision of goods and services Yes check.svg (Since 2016)
Anti-discrimination laws in all other areas (incl. indirect discrimination, hate speech) Yes check.svg (Since 2016)
Same-sex marriages X mark.svg
Recognition of same-sex couples X mark.svg
Stepchild adoption by same-sex couples X mark.svg
Joint adoption by same-sex couples X mark.svg
LGBT people allowed to serve openly in the military X mark.svg
Right to change legal gender X mark.svg
Access to IVF for lesbians X mark.svg
Commercial surrogacy for gay male couples X mark.svg
MSMs allowed to donate blood X mark.svg

See also

Related Research Articles

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 1998.

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 1997.

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 1995.

Section 377 of the British colonial penal code criminalized all sexual acts "against the order of nature". The law was used to prosecute people engaging in oral and anal sex along with homosexual activity. As per Supreme Court Judgement since 2018 Indian Penal Code Section 377 is used for Convictions of non consensual sexual activities among homosexuals with a minimum of ten years imprisonment extended to life imprisonment. It has been used to criminalize third gender people, such as the apwint in Myanmar. In 2018, British Prime Minister Theresa May acknowledged how the legacies of British colonial anti-sodomy laws continue to persist today in the form of discrimination, violence, and death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in the United States</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights in the United States rank among the most advanced in the world, with public opinion and jurisprudence changing significantly since the late 1980s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Jamaica</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in Jamaica face legal and social issues not experienced by non-LGBT people. Consensual sexual intercourse between same-sex partners is legally punishable by imprisonment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Kenya</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Kenya face significant challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Sodomy is a felony per Section 162 of the Kenyan Penal Code, punishable by 21 years' imprisonment, and any sexual practices are a felony under section 165 of the same statute, punishable by 5 years' imprisonment. On 24 May 2019, the High Court of Kenya refused an order to declare sections 162 and 165 unconstitutional. The state does not recognise any relationships between persons of the same sex; same-sex marriage is banned under the Kenyan Constitution since 2010. There are no explicit protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Adoption is prohibited to same-sex couples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Botswana</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in Botswana face legal issues not experienced by non-LGBT citizens. Both female and male same-sex sexual acts have been legal in Botswana since 11 June 2019 after a unanimous ruling by the High Court of Botswana. Despite an appeal by the government, the ruling was upheld by the Botswana Court of Appeal on 29 November 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Trinidad and Tobago</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Trinidad and Tobago face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Households headed by same-sex couples are not eligible for the same rights and benefits as that of opposite-sex couples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Sri Lanka</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in Sri Lanka face significant challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Article 365 of the Sri Lankan Penal Code, which dates from the time of colonial British Ceylon, criminalizes sexual acts deemed "against the order of nature". This has been ruled unenforceable by the Supreme Court, but the court does not have the power to remove laws outright. A private members' bill submitted to parliament in August 2022 has been given the support of the ruling government and is likely to be passed by parliament in 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Guyana</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Guyana face legal and societal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Guyana is the only country in South America, and the only mainland country in the Americas, where homosexual acts, including anal sex and oral sex, are still illegal. Cross-dressing was illegal until November 2018, when the statute was struck down by the Caribbean Court of Justice, the court of last resort of Guyana.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Eswatini</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in Eswatini are limited. LGBT people face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. According to Rock of Hope, a Swati LGBT advocacy group, "there is no legislation recognising LGBTIs or protecting the right to a non-heterosexual orientation and gender identity and as a result [LGBT people] cannot be open about their orientation or gender identity for fear of rejection and discrimination". Homosexuality is illegal in Eswatini, though this law is in practice unenforced. According to the 2021 Human Rights Practices Report from the US Department of State, "there has never been an arrest or prosecution for consensual same-sex conduct."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Namibia</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Namibia have limited legal protections. Discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity is not banned in Namibia, and households headed by same-sex couples are not eligible for the same legal protections available to opposite-sex couples.

<i>National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Justice</i> South African legal case

National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality and Another v Minister of Justice and Others is a decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa which struck down the laws prohibiting consensual sexual activities between men. Basing its decision on the Bill of Rights in the Constitution – and in particular its explicit prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation – the court unanimously ruled that the crime of sodomy, as well as various other related provisions of the criminal law, were unconstitutional and therefore invalid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Antigua and Barbuda</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in Antigua and Barbuda may face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT citizens.

This article gives a broad overview of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) history in Canada. LGBT activity was considered a crime from the colonial period in Canada until 1969, when Bill C-150 was passed into law. However, there is still discrimination despite anti-discrimination law. For a more detailed listing of individual incidents in Canadian LGBT history, see also Timeline of LGBT history in Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maurice Tomlinson</span> Jamaican gay rights activist (born 1971)

Maurice Tomlinson is a Jamaican lawyer, law professor, and gay rights activist currently living in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. He has been a leading gay rights and HIV activist in the Caribbean for over 20 years and is one of the only Jamaican advocates to challenge the country's 1864 British colonially-imposed anti gay Sodomy Law. This law predominantly affects men who have sex with men (MSM) and carries a possible jail sentence of up to ten years imprisonment with hard labour.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caleb Orozco</span> Belizean LGBT rights activist (born 1973)

Caleb Orozco is an LGBT activist in Belize. He was the chief litigant in a case successfully challenging the anti-sodomy laws of Belize and the co-founder of the only LGBT advocacy group in the country.

<i>Orozco v Attorney General</i> Belize Supreme Court case decided in 2016

Orozco v Attorney General (2016) 90 WIR 161, also known as Orozco v AG, the Orozco case, or the UNIBAM case, was a landmark case heard by the Supreme Court of Belize, which held that a long-standing buggery statute breached constitutional rights to dignity, equality before the law, freedom of expression, privacy, and non-discrimination on grounds of sex, and which declared the statute null and void to the applicable extent. The decision decriminalised consensual same-sex intercourse for the first time in 127 years, and established that the constitutional right to non-discrimination on grounds of sex extended to sexual orientation.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Humes, Aaron (10 August 2016). "Supreme Court rules Section 53 unconstitutional". Belize City, Belize: Breaking Belize News. Retrieved 10 August 2016.
  2. 1 2 3 Ramos, Adele (17 August 2016). ""Sex" redefined 20 years ago, and Belizeans didn't know it!". Amandala . Belize City, Belize. Archived from the original on 18 August 2016. Retrieved 18 August 2016.
  3. ↑ Riley, John (2 January 2020). "Belize appeals court affirms: Anti-gay law is dead". Erasing 76 Crimes. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  4. ↑ The Attorney General v. Caleb Orozco(The Court of Appeal of Belize2019). Text
  5. ↑ "For Belize LGBT's, Pride is Showing". Channel 5 Belize. 3 August 2017. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  6. ↑ "Belize Criminal Code" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-02-24. Retrieved 2012-12-24.
  7. ↑ Stewart, Colin (May 7, 2013). "Belize challenge to anti-gay law, 140 characters at a time". Erasing 76 Crimes. Retrieved 11 April 2015.
  8. ↑ Lavers, Michael K. (August 10, 2016). "Belize's top court strikes down sodomy law". The Washington Blade . Washington, D. C. Retrieved 15 August 2016.
  9. ↑ Trumbach, Tina (11 August 2016). "Cayman same-sex silence continues as Belize overturns anti-gay law". George Town, Grand Cayman: The Cayman Reporter. Archived from the original on 12 August 2016. Retrieved 15 August 2016.
  10. ↑ Mandell, Sean (10 August 2016). "Belize Supreme Court Strikes Down Last Remaining Gay Sex Ban in Central America". Towleroad. Retrieved 10 August 2016.
  11. ↑ "Supreme Court Claim No 668 of 2010 'Caleb Orozco and UNIBAM v. Attorney General of Belize'" (PDF). Retrieved 9 July 2012.
  12. ↑ "UNIBAM regains ground in court", 7 News Belize, 5 December 2012
  13. ↑ Global Post. Gay in Belize? You're breaking the law. Still. . Retrieved 1 December 2013.
  14. ↑ The Guardian. Belize gay rights campaigner is facing more death threats, says lawyer . Retrieved 1 December 2013.
  15. ↑ Caleb Orozco v Attorney General of Belize and others(10 August 2016). Text
  16. ↑ Ring, Trudy (10 August 2016). "Belize High Court Strikes Down Sodomy Law". The Advocate. Retrieved 11 August 2016.
  17. ↑ "UNIBAM Grand Slam: Gay Sex Law Struck Out". Belize City, Belize: 7 News Belize. 10 August 2016. Retrieved 11 August 2016.
  18. ↑ Littauer, Dan (10 August 2016). "Love wins! Belize anti-gay law struck down". Scotland: KaleidoScot. Archived from the original on 27 April 2019. Retrieved 10 August 2016.
  19. ↑ "BREAKING: GOB will not appeal Section 53 decision". Belize City, Belize: Breaking Belize News. 17 August 2016. Archived from the original on 17 August 2016. Retrieved 17 August 2016.
  20. ↑ "GOB will have limited appeal to CJ's ruling on Section 53 - The Guardian Newspaper". The Guardian. Belize. 15 September 2016. Archived from the original on 16 September 2016. Retrieved 17 September 2016.
  21. ↑ "Evangelical Churches Appeal Section 53 Judgment". Belize City, Belize: 7 News Belize. 16 September 2016. Archived from the original on 17 September 2016. Retrieved 17 September 2016.
  22. ↑ "Evangelical Application for Appeal Dismiss, They Must Pay Caleb's Costs". Belize City, Belize: 7 News Belize. 4 October 2016. Archived from the original on 5 October 2016. Retrieved 5 October 2016.
  23. ↑ "Catholics Officially Out of UNIBAM Appeal". Belize City, Belize: News 5. 5 March 2018. Archived from the original on 6 March 2018. Retrieved 6 March 2018.
  24. ↑ "Churches Abandon Section 53 Appeal". Belize City, Belize: 7 News. 6 March 2018. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
  25. ↑ "Arguing For No Appeal Of Section 53 Ruling". Belize City, Belize: 7 News Belize. 29 October 2018. Archived from the original on 30 October 2018. Retrieved 30 October 2018.
  26. ↑ "Legal implications of Section 53 limited appeal". San Ignacio, Belize: Breaking Belize News. 30 October 2018. Archived from the original on 31 October 2018. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  27. ↑ Humes, Aaron (30 December 2019). "Breaking: Appeal Court upholds expansion of discrimination in Constitution to include sexual orientation". Breaking Belize News . San Ignacio, Belize. Archived from the original on 30 December 2019. Retrieved 31 December 2019.
  28. ↑ Eastwood, Emma (30 December 2019). "Belize court upholds finding that LGBT people are protected by non-discrimination laws, major victory for human rights". Human Dignity Trust. London. Archived from the original on 31 December 2019. Retrieved 31 December 2019.
  29. 1 2 ".::. Latinamerican Press ::." www.lapress.org. 22 January 2022.
  30. ↑ Bowcott, Owen (November 16, 2011). "Global campaign to decriminalise homosexuality to kick off in Belize court". The Guardian. London.
  31. ↑ "Christians 'Take a Stand' Against UNIBAM", 7 News Belize, reported by Jules Vasquez, 5 December 2011
  32. ↑ Kelly, Stacey (25 November 2011). "Decriminalizing homosexuality will have dire ripple effects: churches". Amandala. Retrieved 17 September 2016.
  33. ↑ "Presidential Memorandum -- International Initiatives to Advance the Human Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Persons". whitehouse.gov. December 6, 2011.
  34. 1 2 "Belize Continues to Deny Fundamental Human Rights of Sexual Minorities". Council on Hemispheric Affairs. 17 January 2012.
  35. ↑ "Belize Immigration Act" (PDF).
  36. ↑ Mills, Suzanne (August 11, 2013). "Visibility is liberty". Newsday. Trinidad & Tobago. Retrieved 11 April 2015.
  37. ↑ Jones, Patrick E. (May 8, 2014). "CCJ grants leave to challenge Belize's Immigration Act". Belize: Breaking Belize News. Retrieved 11 April 2015.
  38. ↑ Cayetano, Isani (October 29, 2014). "CARICOM Joins Gay Activist Maurice Tomlinson In Suit Against Belize & Trinidad". Belize City, Belize: News 5. Retrieved 12 April 2015.
  39. ↑ Wee, Darren (19 March 2015). "Landmark case challenges anti-gay laws in Belize and Trinidad and Tobago". London, England: Gay Star News. Archived from the original on 13 April 2015. Retrieved 12 April 2015.
  40. ↑ Humes, Aaron (March 18, 2015). "CCJ hearings end in the case of Maurice Tomlinson". Belize: Breaking Belize News. Retrieved 12 April 2015.
  41. ↑ "Gay rights activist loses case against Belize at the CCJ". Belize City, Belize: El Guardian. 16 June 2016. Archived from the original on 18 June 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  42. ↑ Maurice Tomlinson v. the State of Belize and the State of Trinidad and Tobago(CCJ2016). Text
  43. ↑ "Belize turnaround on gay rights: 'Unbelievable!'". November 20, 2018.
  44. ↑ "Polling Sexual Perceptions". 7 News Belize. April 17, 2015. Retrieved April 18, 2015.
  45. 1 2 Humes, Aaron (April 17, 2015). "UNAIDS surveys: Belizeans more accepting of LGBT; want more sex education in schools". Breaking Belize News. Belize Media Group. Retrieved April 18, 2015.
  46. 1 2 3 Does Belize Welcome The LGBT Community?, centralamerica.com, 22 November 2017

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.