Magnus effect

Last updated

The Magnus effect is a phenomenon that occurs when a spinning object is moving through a fluid. A lift force acts on the spinning object and its path may be deflected in a manner not present when it is not spinning. The strength and direction of the Magnus effect is dependent on the speed and direction the of rotation of the object. [1]

Contents

The Magnus effect is named after Heinrich Gustav Magnus, the German physicist who investigated it. The force on a rotating cylinder is an example of Kutta–Joukowski lift, [2] named after Martin Kutta and Nikolay Zhukovsky (or Joukowski), mathematicians who contributed to the knowledge of how lift is generated in a fluid flow. [3]

Description

The most readily observable case of the Magnus effect is when a spinning sphere (or cylinder) curves away from the arc it would follow if it were not spinning. It is often used by football (soccer) and volleyball players, baseball pitchers, and cricket bowlers. Consequently, the phenomenon is important in the study of the physics of many ball sports. It is also an important factor in the study of the effects of spinning on guided missiles—and has some engineering uses, for instance in the design of rotor ships and Flettner airplanes.

Topspin in ball games is defined as spin about a horizontal axis perpendicular to the direction of travel that moves the top surface of the ball in the direction of travel. Under the Magnus effect, topspin produces a downward swerve of a moving ball, greater than would be produced by gravity alone. Backspin produces an upwards force that prolongs the flight of a moving ball. [4] Likewise side-spin causes swerve to either side as seen during some baseball pitches, e.g. slider. [5] The overall behaviour is similar to that around an aerofoil (see lift force), but with a circulation generated by mechanical rotation rather than shape of the foil. [6]

In baseball, this effect is used to generate the downward motion of a curveball, in which the baseball is rotating forward (with 'topspin'). Participants in other sports played with a ball also take advantage of this effect.

Physics

The Magnus effect or Magnus force acts on a rotating body moving relative to a fluid. Examples include a "curve ball" in baseball or a tennis ball hit obliquely. The rotation alters the boundary layer between the object and the fluid. The force is perpendicular to the relative direction of motion and oriented towards the direction of rotation, i.e. the direction the "nose" of the ball is turning towards. [7] The magnitude of the force depends primarily on the rotation rate, the relative velocity, and the geometry of the body; the magnitude also depends upon the body's surface roughness and viscosity of the fluid. Accurate quantitative predictions of the force are difficult, [7] :20 but as with other examples of aerodynamic lift there are simpler, qualitative explanations:

Flow deflection

The Magnus effect, depicted with a backspinning cylinder or ball in an airstream. The arrow represents the resulting lifting force. The curly flow lines represent a turbulent wake. The airflow has been deflected in the direction of spin.
Air is carried around the object; this adds to the velocity of the airstream above the object and subtracts below resulting in increased airspeed above and lowered airspeed below. Sketch of Magnus effect with streamlines and turbulent wake.svg
The Magnus effect, depicted with a backspinning cylinder or ball in an airstream. The arrow represents the resulting lifting force. The curly flow lines represent a turbulent wake. The airflow has been deflected in the direction of spin.
Air is carried around the object; this adds to the velocity of the airstream above the object and subtracts below resulting in increased airspeed above and lowered airspeed below.

The diagram shows lift being produced on a back-spinning ball. The wake and trailing air-flow have been deflected downwards; according to Newton's third law of motion there must be a reaction force in the opposite direction. [1] [8]

Pressure differences

The air's viscosity and the surface roughness of the object cause the air to be carried around the object. This adds to the air velocity on one side of the object and decreases the velocity on the other side. Bernoulli's principle states that under certain conditions increased flow speed is associated with reduced pressure, implying that there is lower air pressure on one side than the other. This pressure difference results in a force perpendicular to the direction of travel. [9]

While the pipe rotates, as a consequence of fluid friction, it pulls air around it. This makes the air flow with higher speed on one side of the pipe and with lower speed on the other side.
Magnus effect.gif
Magnus effect in a particle simulation of a 2D liquid

Kutta–Joukowski lift

The topspinning cylinder "pulls" the airflow up and the air in turn pulls the cylinder down, as per Newton's Third Law Magnus-anim-canette.gif
The topspinning cylinder "pulls" the airflow up and the air in turn pulls the cylinder down, as per Newton's Third Law

On a cylinder, the force due to rotation is an example of Kutta–Joukowski lift. It can be analysed in terms of the vortex produced by rotation. The lift per unit length of the cylinder , is the product of the freestream velocity (in m/s), the fluid density (in kg/m3), and circulation due to viscous effects: [2]

where the vortex strength (assuming that the surrounding fluid obeys the no-slip condition) is given by

[ citation needed ]

where ω is the angular velocity of the cylinder (in rad/s) and r is the radius of the cylinder (in m).

Inverse Magnus effect

In wind tunnel studies, (rough surfaced) baseballs show the Magnus effect, but smooth spheres do not. [10] Further study has shown that certain combinations of conditions result in turbulence in the fluid on one side of the rotating body but laminar flow on the other side. [11] In these cases are called the inverse Magnus effect: the deflection is opposite to that of the typical Magnus effect. [12]

Magnus effect in potential flow

Potential flow is a mathematical model of the steady flow of a fluid with no viscosity or vorticity present. For potential flow around a circular cylinder, it provides the following results:

Non-spinning cylinder

Streamlines for the potential flow around a circular cylinder in a uniform flow. Potential cylinder.svg
Streamlines for the potential flow around a circular cylinder in a uniform flow.

The flow pattern is symmetric about a horizontal axis through the centre of the cylinder. At each point above the axis and its corresponding point below the axis, the spacing of streamlines is the same so velocities are also the same at the two points. Bernoulli’s principle shows that, outside the boundary layers, pressures are also the same at corresponding points. There is no lift acting on the cylinder. [13]

Spinning cylinder

Streamlines for the potential flow around a spinning cylinder. The concentric circular streamlines of a free vortex have been superimposed on the parallel streamlines of a uniform flow. Streamline of magnus effect.svg
Streamlines for the potential flow around a spinning cylinder. The concentric circular streamlines of a free vortex have been superimposed on the parallel streamlines of a uniform flow.

Streamlines are closer spaced immediately above the cylinder than below, so the air flows faster past the upper surface than past the lower surface. Bernoulli’s principle shows that the pressure adjacent to the upper surface is lower than the pressure adjacent to the lower surface. The Magnus force acts vertically upwards on the cylinder. [14]

Streamlines immediately above the cylinder are curved with radius little more than the radius of the cylinder. This means there is low pressure close to the upper surface of the cylinder. Streamlines immediately below the cylinder are curved with a larger radius than streamlines above the cylinder. This means there is higher pressure acting on the lower surface than on the upper. [15]

Air immediately above and below the cylinder is curving downwards, accelerated by the pressure gradient. A downwards force is acting on the air.

Newton's third law predicts that the Magnus force and the downwards force acting on the air are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.

History

The effect is named after German physicist Heinrich Gustav Magnus who demonstrated the effect with a rapidly rotating brass cylinder and an air blower in 1852. [16] [17] [7] :18 In 1672, Isaac Newton had speculated on the effect after observing tennis players in his Cambridge college. [18] [19] In 1742, Benjamin Robins, a British mathematician, ballistics researcher, and military engineer, explained deviations in the trajectories of musket balls due to their rotation. [20] [21] [22] [23]

Pioneering wind tunnel research on the Magnus effect was carried out with smooth rotating spheres in 1928. [24] Lyman Briggs later studied baseballs in a wind tunnel, [10] and others have produced images of the effect. [25] [26] [12] The studies show that a turbulent wake behind the spinning ball causes aerodynamic drag, plus there is a noticeable angular deflection in the wake, and this deflection is in the direction of spin.

In sport

Magnus effect on Roberto Carlos' infamous "banana kick" Copy of Alexander Leal - Wikipedia Digital Diagram.svg
Magnus effect on Roberto Carlos' infamous "banana kick"
An animated diagram of a 12-6 curveball 12-6 Curveball.gif
An animated diagram of a 12–6 curveball

The Magnus effect explains commonly observed deviations from the typical trajectories or paths of spinning balls in sport, notably association football, table tennis, [27] tennis, [28] volleyball, golf, baseball, and cricket.

The curved path of a golf ball known as slice or hook is largely due to the ball's spin axis being tilted away from the horizontal due to the combined effects of club face angle and swing path, causing the Magnus effect to act at an angle, moving the ball away from a straight line in its trajectory. [29] Backspin (upper surface rotating backwards from the direction of movement) on a golf ball causes a vertical force that counteracts the force of gravity slightly, and enables the ball to remain airborne a little longer than it would were the ball not spinning: this allows the ball to travel farther than a ball not spinning about its horizontal axis.[ citation needed ]

In table tennis, the Magnus effect is easily observed, because of the small mass and low density of the ball. An experienced player can place a wide variety of spins on the ball. Table tennis rackets usually have a surface made of rubber to give the racket maximum grip on the ball to impart a spin.

In cricket, the Magnus effect contributes to the types of motion known as drift, dip and lift in spin bowling, depending on the axis of rotation of the spin applied to the ball. The Magnus effect is not responsible for the movement seen in conventional swing bowling, [30] :Fig. 4.19 in which the pressure gradient is not caused by the ball's spin, but rather by its raised seam, and the asymmetric roughness or smoothness of its two halves; however, the Magnus effect may be responsible for so-called "Malinga Swing", [31] [32] as observed in the bowling of the swing bowler Lasith Malinga.

In airsoft, a system known as hop-up is used to create a backspin on a fired BB, which greatly increases its range, using the Magnus effect in a similar manner as in golf.

In baseball, pitchers often impart different spins on the ball, causing it to curve in the desired direction due to the Magnus effect. The PITCHf/x system measures the change in trajectory caused by Magnus in all pitches thrown in Major League Baseball. [33]

The match ball for the 2010 FIFA World Cup has been criticised for the different Magnus effect from previous match balls. The ball was described as having less Magnus effect and as a result flies farther but with less controllable swerve. [34]

In external ballistics

The Magnus effect can also be found in advanced external ballistics. First, a spinning bullet in flight is often subject to a crosswind, which can be simplified as blowing from either the left or the right. In addition to this, even in completely calm air a bullet experiences a small sideways wind component due to its yawing motion. This yawing motion along the bullet's flight path means that the nose of the bullet points in a slightly different direction from the direction the bullet travels. In other words, the bullet "skids" sideways at any given moment, and thus experiences a small sideways wind component in addition to any crosswind component. [35]

The combined sideways wind component of these two effects causes a Magnus force to act on the bullet, which is perpendicular both to the direction the bullet is pointing and the combined sideways wind. In a very simple case where we ignore various complicating factors, the Magnus force from the crosswind would cause an upward or downward force to act on the spinning bullet (depending on the left or right wind and rotation), causing deflection of the bullet's flight path up or down, thus influencing the point of impact.

Overall, the effect of the Magnus force on a bullet's flight path itself is usually insignificant compared to other forces such as aerodynamic drag. However, it greatly affects the bullet's stability, which in turn affects the amount of drag, how the bullet behaves upon impact, and many other factors. The stability of the bullet is affected, because the Magnus effect acts on the bullet's centre of pressure instead of its centre of gravity. [36] This means that it affects the yaw angle of the bullet; it tends to twist the bullet along its flight path, either towards the axis of flight (decreasing the yaw thus stabilising the bullet) or away from the axis of flight (increasing the yaw thus destabilising the bullet). The critical factor is the location of the centre of pressure, which depends on the flowfield structure, which in turn depends mainly on the bullet's speed (supersonic or subsonic), but also the shape, air density and surface features. If the centre of pressure is ahead of the centre of gravity, the effect is destabilizing; if the centre of pressure is behind the centre of gravity, the effect is stabilising. [37]

In aviation

Anton Flettner's rotor aircraft Flettner Rotor Aircraft.jpg
Anton Flettner's rotor aircraft

Some aircraft have been built to use the Magnus effect to create lift with a rotating cylinder instead of a wing, allowing flight at lower horizontal speeds. [2] The earliest attempt to use the Magnus effect for a heavier-than-air aircraft was in 1910 by a US member of Congress, Butler Ames of Massachusetts. The next attempt was in the early 1930s by three inventors in New York state. [38]

Ship propulsion and stabilization

E-Ship 1 with Flettner rotors mounted E-Ship 1 achtern.JPG
E-Ship 1 with Flettner rotors mounted

Rotor ships use mast-like cylinders, called Flettner rotors, for propulsion. These are mounted vertically on the ship's deck. When the wind blows from the side, the Magnus effect creates a forward thrust. Thus, as with any sailing ship, a rotor ship can only move forwards when there is a wind blowing. The effect is also used in a special type of ship stabilizer consisting of a rotating cylinder mounted beneath the waterline and emerging laterally. By controlling the direction and speed of rotation, strong lift or downforce can be generated. [39] The largest deployment of the system to date is in the motor yacht Eclipse.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coriolis force</span> Apparent force in a rotating reference frame

In physics, the Coriolis force is an inertial force that acts on objects in motion within a frame of reference that rotates with respect to an inertial frame. In a reference frame with clockwise rotation, the force acts to the left of the motion of the object. In one with anticlockwise rotation, the force acts to the right. Deflection of an object due to the Coriolis force is called the Coriolis effect. Though recognized previously by others, the mathematical expression for the Coriolis force appeared in an 1835 paper by French scientist Gaspard-Gustave de Coriolis, in connection with the theory of water wheels. Early in the 20th century, the term Coriolis force began to be used in connection with meteorology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lift (force)</span> Force perpendicular to flow of surrounding fluid

When a fluid flows around an object, the fluid exerts a force on the object. Lift is the component of this force that is perpendicular to the oncoming flow direction. It contrasts with the drag force, which is the component of the force parallel to the flow direction. Lift conventionally acts in an upward direction in order to counter the force of gravity, but it is defined to act perpendicular to the flow and therefore can act in any direction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bernoulli's principle</span> Principle relating to fluid dynamics

Bernoulli's principle is a key concept in fluid dynamics that relates pressure, speed and height. Bernoulli's principle states that an increase in the speed of a parcel of fluid occurs simultaneously with a decrease in either the pressure or the height above a datum. The principle is named after the Swiss mathematician and physicist Daniel Bernoulli, who published it in his book Hydrodynamica in 1738. Although Bernoulli deduced that pressure decreases when the flow speed increases, it was Leonhard Euler in 1752 who derived Bernoulli's equation in its usual form.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vortex</span> Fluid flow revolving around an axis of rotation

In fluid dynamics, a vortex is a region in a fluid in which the flow revolves around an axis line, which may be straight or curved. Vortices form in stirred fluids, and may be observed in smoke rings, whirlpools in the wake of a boat, and the winds surrounding a tropical cyclone, tornado or dust devil.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coandă effect</span> Tendency of a fluid jet to stay attached to a convex surface

The Coandă effect is the tendency of a fluid jet to stay attached to a convex surface. Merriam-Webster describes it as "the tendency of a jet of fluid emerging from an orifice to follow an adjacent flat or curved surface and to entrain fluid from the surroundings so that a region of lower pressure develops."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aircraft flight dynamics</span> Science of air vehicle orientation and control in three dimensions

Flight dynamics is the science of air vehicle orientation and control in three dimensions. The three critical flight dynamics parameters are the angles of rotation in three dimensions about the vehicle's center of gravity (cg), known as pitch, roll and yaw. These are collectively known as aircraft attitude, often principally relative to the atmospheric frame in normal flight, but also relative to terrain during takeoff or landing, or when operating at low elevation. The concept of attitude is not specific to fixed-wing aircraft, but also extends to rotary aircraft such as helicopters, and dirigibles, where the flight dynamics involved in establishing and controlling attitude are entirely different.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">External ballistics</span> Behavior of projectiles in flight

External ballistics or exterior ballistics is the part of ballistics that deals with the behavior of a projectile in flight. The projectile may be powered or un-powered, guided or unguided, spin or fin stabilized, flying through an atmosphere or in the vacuum of space, but most certainly flying under the influence of a gravitational field.

Swing bowling is a technique used for bowling in the sport of cricket. Practitioners are known as swing bowlers. Swing bowling is generally classed as a subtype of fast bowling.

In fluid dynamics, drag, sometimes referred to as fluid resistance, is a force acting opposite to the relative motion of any object moving with respect to a surrounding fluid. This can exist between two fluid layers, two solid surfaces, or between a fluid and a solid surface. Drag forces tend to decrease fluid velocity relative to the solid object in the fluid's path.

A foil is a solid object with a shape such that when placed in a moving fluid at a suitable angle of attack the lift is substantially larger than the drag. If the fluid is a gas, the foil is called an airfoil or aerofoil, and if the fluid is water the foil is called a hydrofoil.

Boundary layer control refers to methods of controlling the behaviour of fluid flow boundary layers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Topspin</span> Property of a rotating ball

In ball sports, topspin or overspin is a property of a ball that rotates forwards as it is moving. Topspin on a ball propelled through the air imparts a downward force that causes the ball to drop, due to its interaction with the air. Topspin is the opposite of backspin.

The Kutta–Joukowski theorem is a fundamental theorem in aerodynamics used for the calculation of lift of an airfoil translating in a uniform fluid at a constant speed so large that the flow seen in the body-fixed frame is steady and unseparated. The theorem relates the lift generated by an airfoil to the speed of the airfoil through the fluid, the density of the fluid and the circulation around the airfoil. The circulation is defined as the line integral around a closed loop enclosing the airfoil of the component of the velocity of the fluid tangent to the loop. It is named after Martin Kutta and Nikolai Zhukovsky who first developed its key ideas in the early 20th century. Kutta–Joukowski theorem is an inviscid theory, but it is a good approximation for real viscous flow in typical aerodynamic applications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flettner rotor</span> Cylindrical, rotating aerodynamic surface

A Flettner rotor is a smooth cylinder with disc end plates which is spun along its long axis and, as air passes at right angles across it, the Magnus effect causes an aerodynamic force to be generated in the direction perpendicular to both the long axis and the direction of airflow. The rotor sail is named after the German aviation engineer and inventor Anton Flettner, who started developing the rotor sail in the 1920s.

In fluid dynamics, flow can be decomposed into primary flow plus secondary flow, a relatively weaker flow pattern superimposed on the stronger primary flow pattern. The primary flow is often chosen to be an exact solution to simplified or approximated governing equations, such as potential flow around a wing or geostrophic current or wind on the rotating Earth. In that case, the secondary flow usefully spotlights the effects of complicated real-world terms neglected in those approximated equations. For instance, the consequences of viscosity are spotlighted by secondary flow in the viscous boundary layer, resolving the tea leaf paradox. As another example, if the primary flow is taken to be a balanced flow approximation with net force equated to zero, then the secondary circulation helps spotlight acceleration due to the mild imbalance of forces. A smallness assumption about secondary flow also facilitates linearization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wind-turbine aerodynamics</span> Physical property

The primary application of wind turbines is to generate energy using the wind. Hence, the aerodynamics is a very important aspect of wind turbines. Like most machines, wind turbines come in many different types, all of them based on different energy extraction concepts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hop-up (airsoft)</span> Backspin on airsoft pellets and BBs

Hop-up is the backspin put on airsoft pellets and BBs to increase their range via the Magnus effect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yaw system</span>

The yaw system of wind turbines is the component responsible for the orientation of the wind turbine rotor towards the wind.

Blade element momentum theory is a theory that combines both blade element theory and momentum theory. It is used to calculate the local forces on a propeller or wind-turbine blade. Blade element theory is combined with momentum theory to alleviate some of the difficulties in calculating the induced velocities at the rotor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bouncing ball</span> Physics of bouncing balls

The physics of a bouncing ball concerns the physical behaviour of bouncing balls, particularly its motion before, during, and after impact against the surface of another body. Several aspects of a bouncing ball's behaviour serve as an introduction to mechanics in high school or undergraduate level physics courses. However, the exact modelling of the behaviour is complex and of interest in sports engineering.

References

  1. 1 2 Halliday, David (1988). Fundamentals of Physics (3rd Extended ed.). John Wiley and Sons. pp. E6–E8. The result is that the wake is not symmetrical; the airflow is deflected to one side, and the sphere experiences a reaction force in the opposite direction... The direction and strength of this force will depend on the rate and direction of spin. This phenomenon is known as the Magnus effect...
  2. 1 2 3 "Lift on rotating cylinders". NASA Glenn Research Center. 9 November 2010. Archived from the original on 11 January 2014. Retrieved 7 November 2013.
  3. Anderson, John D. (1984) Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, sections 3.15 and 3.16. McGraw-Hill ISBN 0-07-001656-9
  4. "Why are Golf Balls Dimpled?". math.ucr.edu.
  5. The Curveball Archived 21 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine , The Physics of Baseball.
  6. Clancy, L.J. (1975), Aerodynamics, Section 4.6, Pitman Publishing
  7. 1 2 3 Seifert, Jost (November 2012). "A review of the Magnus effect in aeronautics". Progress in Aerospace Sciences. 55: 17–45. Bibcode:2012PrAeS..55...17S. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2012.07.001.
  8. Glenn Research Center. "What is Lift?" . Retrieved 20 September 2024. Lift occurs when a moving flow of gas is turned by a solid object. The flow is turned in one direction, and the lift is generated in the opposite direction, according to Newton's Third Law of action and reaction.
  9. Halliday, David (1988). Fundamentals of Physics (3rd Extended ed.). John Wiley and Sons. pp. 278–279. Without viscosity and the boundary layer, the spinning ball could not carry air around in this way... the velocity of air below the ball is less than that above the ball. From Bernoulli's equation, the pressure of air below the ball must be greater than that above, so the ball experiences a dynamic lift force.
  10. 1 2 Briggs, Lyman J. (November 1959). "Effect of Spin and Speed on the Lateral Deflection (Curve) of a Baseball; and the Magnus Effect for Smooth Spheres". American Journal of Physics. 27 (8): 589–596. Bibcode:1959AmJPh..27..589B. doi:10.1119/1.1934921.
  11. Kim, Jooha; Choi, Haecheon; Park, Hyungmin; Yoo, Jung Yul (10 September 2014). "Inverse Magnus effect on a rotating sphere: when and why". Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 754. Bibcode:2014JFM...754R...2K. doi:10.1017/jfm.2014.428.
  12. 1 2 Cross, Rod. "Wind Tunnel Photographs" (PDF). Physics Department, University of Sydney. p. 4. Retrieved 10 February 2013.
  13. "From the symmetry of the streamlines it is clear that the velocity of the air is the same at corresponding points above and below the ball, ..."
    "From Bernoulli's equation we then deduce that the pressure at such corresponding points are equal and that the air exerts no upward or downward force on the ball by virtue of its motion; the dynamic lift is zero." Resnick and Halliday (1966), PHYSICS, Section 18-5
  14. "When dynamic lift on an object occurs it is always associated with an unsymmetrical set of streamlines relatively close together on one side and relatively far apart on the other ... that correspond ... to circulation of fluid around the object."
    “[the streamlines] are closer together above [the body] than they are below so that Bernoulli's principle predicts the observed dynamic lift." Resnick and Halliday (1966), PHYSICS, Section 18-5
  15. Babinsky, Holger (November 2003). "How do wings work?". Physics Education. 38 (6): 497–503. Bibcode:2003PhyEd..38..497B. doi:10.1088/0031-9120/38/6/001. ...if a streamline is curved, there must be a pressure gradient across the streamline
  16. Magnus, G. (1852). "Über die Abweichung der Geschosse" [On the Deviation of Projectiles]. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (in German): 1–23 via Biodiversity Heritage Library.
  17. Magnus, G. (January 1853). "Ueber die Abweichung der Geschosse, und: Ueber eine auffallende Erscheinung bei rotirenden Körpern" [On the deviation of projectiles, and: On a sinking phenomenon among rotating bodies]. Annalen der Physik (in German). 164 (1): 1–29. Bibcode:1853AnP...164....1M. doi:10.1002/andp.18531640102.
  18. Newton, Isaac (19 February 1672). "A letter of Mr. Isaac Newton, Professor of the Mathematicks in the University of Cambridge; containing his new theory about light and colors: sent by the author to the publisher from Cambridge, Febr. 6. 1671/72; in order to be communicated to the R. Society". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 6 (80): 3075–3087. doi:10.1098/rstl.1671.0072.
  19. Gleick, James. 2004. Isaac Newton. London: Harper Fourth Estate.[ page needed ]
  20. Benjamin Robins, New Principles of Gunnery: Containing the Determinations of the Force of Gun-powder and Investigations of the Difference in the Resisting Power of the Air to Swift and Slow Motions (London: J. Nourse, 1742). (On p. 208 of the 1805 edition of Robins' New Principles of Gunnery, Robins describes an experiment in which he observed the Magnus effect: A ball was suspended by a tether consisting of two strings twisted together, and the ball was made to swing. As the strings unwound, the swinging ball rotated, and the plane of its swing also rotated. The direction the plane rotated depended on the direction that the ball rotated.)
  21. Tom Holmberg, "Artillery Swings Like a Pendulum..." in "The Napoleon Series"
  22. Steele, Brett D. (1994). "Muskets and Pendulums: Benjamin Robins, Leonhard Euler, and the Ballistics Revolution". Technology and Culture. 35 (2): 348–382. doi:10.1353/tech.1994.0084. JSTOR   3106305. Project MUSE   887921.
  23. Newton's and Robins' observations of the Magnus effect are reproduced in: Peter Guthrie Tait (1893) " On the path of a rotating spherical projectile," Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, vol. 37, pages 427–440.
  24. Maccoll, John W. (September 1928). "Aerodynamics of a Spinning Sphere". The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society. 32 (213): 777–798. doi:10.1017/S0368393100136260.
  25. Brown, F (1971). See the Wind Blow. University of Notre Dame.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  26. Van Dyke, Milton (1982). An album of Fluid motion. Stanford University.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  27. "Identifying The Magnus Effect in Table Tennis". edgesandnets.com. 23 April 2021. Retrieved 23 April 2021.
  28. Lord Rayleigh (1877) "On the irregular flight of a tennis ball", Messenger of Mathematics , vol. 7, pages 14–16.
  29. "Spin Axis". Trackman Golf. 17 November 2015.
  30. Clancy, L. J. (1975). Aerodynamics. London: Pitman Publishing Limited. ISBN   0-273-01120-0.
  31. Mehta, R. D. (2007). "Malinga's unique swing". The Wisden Cricketer . Vol. 4, no. 10. p. 23. ISSN   1740-9519.
  32. Mehta, R. D. (2014). Fluid Mechanics of Cricket Ball Swing. 19th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference. Vol. 1. Melbourne: Australasian Fluid Mechanics Society. pp. 1–8. ISBN   978-1-5108-2684-7. S2CID   34183383.
  33. Nathan, Alan M. (18 October 2012). "Determining Pitch Movement from PITCHf/x Data" (PDF).[ self-published source? ]
  34. SBS 2010 FIFA World Cup Show interview 22 June 2010 10:30pm by Craig Johnston
  35. Ruprecht Nennstiel. "Yaw of repose". Nennstiel-ruprecht.de. Retrieved 22 February 2013.
  36. "The mathematical modelling of projectile trajectories under the influence of environmental effects, Ryan F. Hooke,∗University of New South Wales Canberra at the Australian Defence Force Academy, 2612, Australia". Archived from the original on 4 February 2018. Retrieved 2 February 2018.
  37. Tom Benson. "Conditions for Rocket Stability". Archived from the original on 13 May 2013. Retrieved 29 August 2014.
  38. "Whirling Spools Lift This Plane". Popular Science. November 1930. p. 26. Retrieved 9 May 2021.
  39. "Quantum Rotary Stabilizers". YouTube . 2 June 2009. Archived from the original on 21 July 2013.

Further reading