Material flow analysis

Last updated

Material flow analysis (MFA), also referred to as substance flow analysis (SFA), is an analytical method to quantify flows and stocks of materials or substances in a well-defined system. MFA is an important tool to study the bio-physical aspects of human activity on different spatial and temporal scales. It is considered a core method of industrial ecology or anthropogenic, urban, social and industrial metabolism. MFA is used to study material, substance, or product flows across different industrial sectors or within ecosystems. MFA can also be applied to a single industrial installation, for example, for tracking nutrient flows through a waste water treatment plant. When combined with an assessment of the costs associated with material flows this business-oriented application of MFA is called material flow cost accounting. MFA is an important tool to study the circular economy and to devise material flow management. Since the 1990s, the number of publications related to material flow analysis has grown steadily. Peer-reviewed journals that publish MFA-related work include the Journal of Industrial Ecology , Ecological Economics , Environmental Science and Technology , and Resources, Conservation, and Recycling. [1]

Contents

Methodology

Motivation

Human needs such as shelter, food, transport, or communication require materials like wood, starch, sugar, iron and steel, copper, or semiconductors. As society develops and economic activity expands, material production, use, and disposal increase to a level where unwanted impacts on environment and society cannot be neglected anymore, neither locally nor globally. Material flows are at the core of local environmental problems such as leaching from landfills or oil spills. Rising concern about global warming puts a previously unimportant waste flow, carbon dioxide, on top of the political and scientific agenda. The gradual shift from primary material production to urban mining in developed countries requires a detailed assessment of in-use and obsolete stocks of materials within human society. Scientists, industries, government bodies, and NGOs therefore need a tool that complements economic accounting and modelling. They need a systematic method to keep track of and display stocks and flows of the materials entering, staying within, and leaving the different processes in the anthroposphere. Material flow analysis is such a method.

Basic principles

MFA is based on two fundamental and well-established scientific principles, the systems approach and mass balance. [2] [3] The system definition is the starting point of every MFA study.

System definition

Basic MFA system without quantification. MFASystem 1.png
Basic MFA system without quantification.
A more general MFA system without quantification. MFASystem 2.png
A more general MFA system without quantification.

An MFA system is a model of an industrial plant, an industrial sector or a region of concern. The level of detail of the system model is chosen to fit the purpose of the study. An MFA system always consists of the system boundary, one or more processes, material flows between processes, and stocks of materials within processes. Physical exchange between the system and its environment happens via flows that cross the system boundary. Contrary to the preconceived notion that a system represents a specific industrial installation, systems and processes in MFA can represent much larger and more abstract entities as long as they are well-defined. The explicit system definition helps the practitioner to locate the available quantitative information in the system, either as stocks within certain processes or as flows between processes. An MFA system description can be refined by disaggregating processes or simplified by aggregating processes.

Next to specifying the arrangement of processes, stocks, and flows in the system definition, the practitioner also needs to indicate the scale and the indicator element or material of the system studied. The spatial scale describes the geographic entity that is covered by the system. A system representing a certain industrial sector can be applied to the USA, China, certain world regions, or the world as a whole. The temporal scale describes the point in time or the time span for which the system is quantified. The indicator element or material of the system is the physical entity that is measured and for which the mass balance holds. As the name says, an indicator element is a certain chemical element such as cadmium or a substance such as CO2. In general, a material or a product can also be used as indicator as long as a process balance can be established for it. Examples of more general indicators are goods such as passenger cars, materials like steel, or other physical quantities such as energy.

MFA requires practitioners to make precise use of the terms 'material', 'substance', or 'good', as laid out, for example, in chapter 2.1 of Brunner and Rechberger, [4] one of the main references for the MFA method.

  • A chemical element is "a pure chemical substance consisting of one type of atom distinguished by its atomic number". [5]
  • A substance is "any (chemical) element or compound composed of uniform units. All substances are characterised by a unique and identical constitution and are thus homogeneous." From chapter 2.1.1 in Brunner&Rechberger. [4]
  • A good is defined as "economic entity of matter with a positive or negative economic value. Goods are made up of one or several substances". From chapter 2.1.2 in Brunner and Rechberger. [4]
  • The term material in MFA "serves as an umbrella term for both substances and goods". From chapter 2.1.3 in Brunner&Rechberger. [4]
A typical MFA system with quantification. MFASystem 3.png
A typical MFA system with quantification.

Process balance

One of the main purposes of MFA is to quantify the metabolism of the elements of the system. Unlike economic accounting, MFA also covers non-economic waste flows, emissions to the environment, and non-market natural resources.

Model of an industrial process in economic accounting (top) and in physical accounting (bottom). MFAProcess1.png
Model of an industrial process in economic accounting (top) and in physical accounting (bottom).

The process balance is a first order physical principle that turns MFA into a powerful accounting and analysis tool. The nature of the processes in the system determine which balances apply. For a process 'oil refinery', for example, one can establish a mass balance for each chemical element, while this is not possible for a nuclear power station. A car manufacturing plant respects the balance for steel, but a steel mill does not.

When quantifying MFA systems either by measurements or from statistical data, mass and other process balances have to be checked to ensure the correctness of the quantification and to reveal possible data inconsistencies or even misconceptions in the system such as the omission of a flow or a process. Conflicting information can be reconciled using data validation and reconciliation, and the STAN-software offers basic reconciliation functionality that is suitable for many MFA application. [6]

Examples of applications on different spatial and temporal scales

MFA studies are conducted on various spatial and temporal scales and for a variety of elements, substances, and goods. They cover a wide range of process chains and material cycles. Several examples:

Historical development

Recent development

Conducting a state-of-the-art MFA

A state-of-the-art MFA consists of the following steps: [4]

The difference between material and substance flow analysis

While the term 'substance' in 'substance flow analysis (SFA) always refers to chemical substances, the term 'material' in 'material flow analysis (MFA)' has a much wider scope. According to Brunner and Rechberger [4] the term 'material' comprises substances AND goods, and the reason for this wide scope is the wish to apply MFA not only to chemical elements or substances but also to materials like steel, timber, or products like cars or buildings. It is thus possible to conduct an MFA for the passenger vehicle fleet by recording the vehicles entering and leaving the use phase.

Relation to other methods

MFA is complementary to the other core industrial ecology methods life cycle assessment (LCA) and input-output (IO) models. [43] Some overlaps between the different methods exist as they all share the system approach and to some extent the mass balance principle. The methods mainly differ in purpose, scope, and data requirements.

MFA studies often cover the entire cycle (mining, production, manufacturing, use, waste handling) of a certain substance within a given geographical boundary and time frame. Material stocks are explicit in MFA, which makes this method suitable for studies involving resource scarcity and recycling from old scrap. The common use of time series (dynamic modelling) and lifetime models makes MFA a suitable tool for assessing long-term trends in material use.

See also

Related Research Articles

Industrial ecology (IE) is the study of material and energy flows through industrial systems. The global industrial economy can be modelled as a network of industrial processes that extract resources from the Earth and transform those resources into by-products, products and services which can be bought and sold to meet the needs of humanity. Industrial ecology seeks to quantify the material flows and document the industrial processes that make modern society function. Industrial ecologists are often concerned with the impacts that industrial activities have on the environment, with use of the planet's supply of natural resources, and with problems of waste disposal. Industrial ecology is a young but growing multidisciplinary field of research which combines aspects of engineering, economics, sociology, toxicology and the natural sciences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Life-cycle assessment</span> Methodology for assessing environmental impacts

Life cycle assessment (LCA), also known as life cycle analysis, is a methodology for assessing environmental impacts associated with all the stages of the life cycle of a commercial product, process, or service. For instance, in the case of a manufactured product, environmental impacts are assessed from raw material extraction and processing (cradle), through the product's manufacture, distribution and use, to the recycling or final disposal of the materials composing it (grave).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Input–output model</span> Quantitative economic model

In economics, an input–output model is a quantitative economic model that represents the interdependencies between different sectors of a national economy or different regional economies. Wassily Leontief (1906–1999) is credited with developing this type of analysis and earned the Nobel Prize in Economics for his development of this model.

Exergy, often referred to as "available energy" or "useful work potential", is a fundamental concept in the field of thermodynamics and engineering. It plays a crucial role in understanding and quantifying the quality of energy within a system and its potential to perform useful work. Exergy analysis has widespread applications in various fields, including energy engineering, environmental science, and industrial processes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Embodied energy</span> Sum of all the energy required to produce any goods or services

Embodied energy is the sum of all the energy required to produce any goods or services, considered as if that energy were incorporated or 'embodied' in the product itself. The concept can be useful in determining the effectiveness of energy-producing or energy saving devices, or the "real" replacement cost of a building, and, because energy-inputs usually entail greenhouse gas emissions, in deciding whether a product contributes to or mitigates global warming. One fundamental purpose for measuring this quantity is to compare the amount of energy produced or saved by the product in question to the amount of energy consumed in producing it.

Anthropogenic metabolism, also referred to as metabolism of the anthroposphere, is a term used in industrial ecology, material flow analysis, and waste management to describe the material and energy turnover of human society. It emerges from the application of systems thinking to the industrial and other man-made activities and it is a central concept of sustainable development. In modern societies, the bulk of anthropogenic (man-made) material flows is related to one of the following activities: sanitation, transportation, habitation, and communication, which were "of little metabolic significance in prehistoric times". Global man-made stocks of steel in buildings, infrastructure, and vehicles, for example, amount to about 25 Gigatonnes, a figure that is surpassed only by construction materials such as concrete. Sustainable development is closely linked to the design of a sustainable anthropogenic metabolism, which will entail substantial changes in the energy and material turnover of the different human activities. Anthropogenic metabolism can be seen as synonymous to social or socioeconomic metabolism. It comprises both industrial metabolism and urban metabolism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Material flow management</span>

Material flow management (MFM) is an economic focused method of analysis and reformation of goods production and subsequent waste through the lens of material flows, incorporating themes of sustainability and the theory of a circular economy. It is used in social, medical, and urban contexts. However, MFM has grown in the field of industrial ecology, combining both technical and economic approaches to minimize waste that impacts economic prosperity and the environment. It has been heavily utilized by the country of Germany, but it has been applied to the industries of various other countries. The material flow management process utilizes the Sankey diagram, and echoes the circular economy model, while being represented in media environments as a business model which may help lower the costs of production and waste.

Material flow accounting (MFA) is the study of material flows on a national or regional scale. It is therefore sometimes also referred to as regional, national or economy-wide material flow analysis.

Urban metabolism (UM) is a model to facilitate the description and analysis of the flows of the materials and energy within cities, such as undertaken in a material flow analysis of a city. It provides researchers with a metaphorical framework to study the interactions of natural and human systems in specific regions. From the beginning, researchers have tweaked and altered the parameters of the urban metabolism model. C. Kennedy and fellow researchers have produced a clear definition in the 2007 paper The Changing Metabolism of Cities claiming that urban metabolism is "the sum total of the technical and socio-economic process that occur in cities, resulting in growth, production of energy and elimination of waste." With the growing concern of climate change and atmospheric degradation, the use of the urban metabolism model has become a key element in determining and maintaining levels of sustainability and health in cities around the world. Urban metabolism provides a unified or holistic viewpoint to encompass all of the activities of a city in a single model.

Economy-wide material flow accounts (EW-MFA) is a framework to compile statistics linking flows of materials from natural resources to a national economy. EW-MFA are descriptive statistics, in physical units such as tonnes per year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social metabolism</span> Study of materials and energy flows between nature and society

Social metabolism or socioeconomic metabolism is the set of flows of materials and energy that occur between nature and society, between different societies, and within societies. These human-controlled material and energy flows are a basic feature of all societies but their magnitude and diversity largely depend on specific cultures, or sociometabolic regimes. Social or socioeconomic metabolism is also described as "the self-reproduction and evolution of the biophysical structures of human society. It comprises those biophysical transformation processes, distribution processes, and flows, which are controlled by humans for their purposes. The biophysical structures of society and socioeconomic metabolism together form the biophysical basis of society."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Material criticality</span>

Material criticality is the determination of which materials that flow through an industry or economy are most important to the production process. It is a sub-category within the field of material flow analysis (MFA), which is a method to quantitatively analyze the flows of materials used for industrial production in an industry or economy. MFA is a useful tool to assess what impacts materials used in the industrial process have and how efficiently a given process uses them.

Natural capital accounting is the process of calculating the total stocks and flows of natural resources and services in a given ecosystem or region. Accounting for such goods may occur in physical or monetary terms. This process can subsequently inform government, corporate and consumer decision making as each relates to the use or consumption of natural resources and land, and sustainable behaviour.

Environmentally extended input–output analysis (EEIOA) is used in environmental accounting as a tool which reflects production and consumption structures within one or several economies. As such, it is becoming an important addition to material flow accounting.

Dynamic stock modelling (DSM) is a new development in material flow accounting and explicitly considers the role of in-use stocks in past, present, and future material use.

Environmental systems analysis (ESA) is a systematic and systems based approach for describing human actions impacting on the natural environment to support decisions and actions aimed at perceived current or future environmental problems. Impacts of different types of objects are studied that ranges from projects, programs and policies, to organizations, and products. Environmental systems analysis encompasses a family of environmental assessment tools and methods, including life cycle assessment (LCA), material flow analysis (MFA) and substance flow analysis (SFA), and environmental impact assessment (EIA), among others.

A circular economy is an alternative way countries manage their resources, in which usage of products in the traditional linear make, use, and dispose method is not implemented. Instead, resources are used for their maximum utility throughout their life cycle and regenerated in a cyclical pattern minimizing waste. They strive to create economic development through environmental and resource protection. The ideas of a circular economy were officially adopted by China in 2002, when the 16th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party legislated it as a national endeavor though the various sustainability initiatives which were implemented in the previous decades starting in 1973. China adopted the circular economy due to the environmental damage and resource depletion that was occurring from going through its industrialization process. China is currently a world leader in the production of resources, where it produces 46% of the world's aluminum, 50% of steel and 60% of cement, while it has consumed more raw materials than all the countries a part of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) combined. In 2014, China created 3.2 billion tonnes of industrial solid waste, where 2 billion tonnes were recovered using recycling, incineration, reusing and composting. By 2025, China is anticipated to produce up to one quarter of the world's municipal solid waste.

Stefan Bringezu is a German environmental scientist. He has conducted pioneering research in the field of material flow analysis and derived policy-relevant indicators of resource use, which contributed to statistical standards in the EU, OECD, and UNEP and environmental footprinting across scales. He had been selected as inaugural member of the International Panel for Sustainable Resource Management and lead-coordinated in three of their reports. He was scientific director of the Center for Environmental Systems Research at Kassel University, Germany.

The Waste Input-Output (WIO) model is an innovative extension of the environmentally extended input-output (EEIO) model. It enhances the traditional Input-Output (IO) model by incorporating physical waste flows generated and treated alongside monetary flows of products and services. In a WIO model, each waste flow is traced from its generation to its treatment, facilitated by an allocation matrix. Additionally, the model accounts for the transformation of waste during treatment into secondary waste and residues, as well as recycling and final disposal processes. By including the end-of-life (EoL) stage of products, the WIO model enables a comprehensive consideration of the entire product life cycle, encompassing production, use, and disposal stages within the IO analysis framework. As such, it serves as a valuable tool for life cycle assessment (LCA).

Jinkichji Tsukui was a Japanese economist who was Professor of Economics at Osaka University from 1972 to 1989.

References

  1. "Resources, Conservation and Recycling".
  2. Marina Fischer-Kowalski, The Intellectual History of Materials Flow Analysis, Part I, 1860-1970, Journal of Industrial Ecology 2(1), 1998, pp 61-78, doi : 10.1162/jiec.1998.2.1.61.
  3. Marina Fischer-Kowalski, The Intellectual History of Materials Flow Analysis, Part II, 1970-1998, Journal of Industrial Ecology 2(4), 1998, pp 107-136, doi : 10.1162/jiec.1998.2.4.107.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Brunner, P.H.; Rechberger, H. (2004). Practical Handbook of Material Flow Analysis. Lewis Publishers, New York. ISBN   978-1-56670-604-9.
  5. IUPAC, Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd ed. (the "Gold Book") (1997). Online corrected version: (2006–) "chemical element".
  6. "Home". www.stan2web.net.
  7. Eurostat (2013). Economy-wide Material Flow Accounts (EW-MFA) (Report). Eurostat.
  8. Krausmann, Fridolin; Weisz, Helga; Eisenmenger, Nina; Schütz, Helmut; Haas, Willi; Schaffartzik, Anke (2015). "Economy-wide Material Flow Accounting - Introduction and Guide. Social Ecology Working paper 151". Social Ecology Working Paper. Institute of Social Ecology, Alpen-Adria University, Klagenfurt/Graz/Vienna. ISSN   1726-3808.
  9. Baccini and Bader 1996, 'Regionaler Stoffhaushalt' (Regional metabolism), Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg (Germany), ISBN   3-86025-235-6
  10. Baccini P. & Brunner P.H. (2012). Metabolism of the Anthroposphere, Analysis, Evaluation, Design. 2nd Edition, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. ISBN   9780262016650
  11. 'Predicting future emissions based on characteristics of stocks', Ecological Economics, 2002, 41(2), 223-234.
  12. "Wuppertal Institute" . Retrieved 3 July 2011.
  13. Schmidt-Bleek, Friedrich (1994), "MIPS: Ein neues ökologisches Maß", Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch?, pp. 97–141, doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-5650-8_4, ISBN   978-3-0348-5651-5
  14. Bringezu, Stefan; Schütz, Helmut; Moll, Stephan (March 2003). "Rationale for and Interpretation of Economy-Wide Materials Flow Analysis and Derived Indicators". Journal of Industrial Ecology. 7 (2): 43–64. Bibcode:2003JInEc...7...43B. doi:10.1162/108819803322564343. ISSN   1088-1980. S2CID   154386004.
  15. Pannekoucke, Sabine (2005-04-20). "Dominique Bourg et Suren Erkman (eds), 2003, Perspectives on Industrial Ecology, Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, 384 pages ISBN 1874719462". Développement durable et territoires. doi: 10.4000/developpementdurable.961 . ISSN   1772-9971. S2CID   193004848.
  16. Klancko, Robert John (June 2003). "A Handbook of Industrial Ecology. Robert U. Ayres and Leslie W. Ayres, eds. 2002. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA. 680 pp. $285 hardcover". Environmental Practice. 5 (2): 183–184. doi:10.1017/s1466046603261123. ISSN   1466-0466. S2CID   128714127.
  17. Bringezu, Stefan; Schütz, Helmut; Steger, Sören; Baudisch, Jan (November 2004). "International comparison of resource use and its relation to economic growth". Ecological Economics. 51 (1–2): 97–124. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.04.010. ISSN   0921-8009.
  18. Bringezu, Stefan; van de Sand, Isabel; Schütz, Helmut; Bleischwitz, Raimund; Moll, Stephan (2009), "Analysing global resource use of national and regional economies across various levels", Sustainable Resource Management: Global Trends, Visions and Policies, Greenleaf Publishing Limited, pp. 10–51, doi:10.9774/gleaf.978-1-907643-07-1_3, ISBN   978-1-907643-07-1 , retrieved 2023-10-01
  19. Adriaanse, Albert (1997). Resource flows: the material basis of industrial economies. World Resources Institute. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. ISBN   978-1-56973-209-0.
  20. Bringezu, Stefan; Bleischwitz, Raimund, eds. (2017-09-08). Sustainable Resource Management. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351279284. ISBN   978-1-351-27928-4. S2CID   106557145.
  21. Mostert; Bringezu (2019-04-02). "Measuring Product Material Footprint as New Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method: Indicators and Abiotic Characterization Factors". Resources. 8 (2): 61. doi: 10.3390/resources8020061 . ISSN   2079-9276.
  22. Sameer, Husam; Weber, Viktoria; Mostert, Clemens; Bringezu, Stefan; Fehling, Ekkehard; Wetzel, Alexander (2019-03-13). "Environmental Assessment of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete Using Carbon, Material, and Water Footprint". Materials. 12 (6): 851. Bibcode:2019Mate...12..851S. doi: 10.3390/ma12060851 . ISSN   1996-1944. PMC   6470619 . PMID   30871243.
  23. Hatfield-Dodds, Steve; Schandl, Heinz; Bringezu, Stefan; Che, Nhu; Ekins, Paul; Flörke, Martina; Frank, Stefan; Havlik, Petr; Hüfner, Rebecca (2020-09-16), "Two outlooks for resource use", Global Resources Outlook 2019, UN, pp. 98–123, doi:10.18356/d9b3639f-en, ISBN   978-92-807-3741-7, S2CID   234645562 , retrieved 2023-10-01
  24. "UNEP" . Retrieved 3 July 2011.
  25. "IPCC" . Retrieved 3 July 2011.
  26. "Accounting in the EU" . Retrieved 3 July 2011.
  27. "Accounting in Japan" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 September 2011. Retrieved 3 July 2011.
  28. "World Resources Forum" . Retrieved 16 September 2019.
  29. Nakamura, Shinichiro; Nakajima, Kenichi; Kondo, Yasushi; Nagasaka, Tetsuya (2007). "The Waste Input-Output Approach to Materials Flow Analysis". Journal of Industrial Ecology. 11 (4): 50–63. Bibcode:2007JInEc..11...50N. doi:10.1162/jiec.2007.1290. ISSN   1088-1980. S2CID   154240391.
  30. Nakamura, Shinichiro; Kondo, Yasushi (2009). Waste Input-Output Analysis. Concepts and Application to Industrial Ecology. Springer. ISBN   978-1-4020-9901-4.
  31. Nakamura, Shinichiro; Kondo, Yasushi; Matsubae, Kazuyo; Nakajima, Kenichi; Nagasaka, Tetsuya (2011-02-01). "UPIOM: A New Tool of MFA and Its Application to the Flow of Iron and Steel Associated with Car Production". Environmental Science & Technology. 45 (3): 1114–1120. Bibcode:2011EnST...45.1114N. doi:10.1021/es1024299. ISSN   0013-936X. PMID   21174465.
  32. Nakajima, Kenichi; Ohno, Hajime; Kondo, Yasushi; Matsubae, Kazuyo; Takeda, Osamu; Miki, Takahiro; Nakamura, Shinichiro; Nagasaka, Tetsuya (2013-05-07). "Simultaneous Material Flow Analysis of Nickel, Chromium, and Molybdenum Used in Alloy Steel by Means of Input–Output Analysis". Environmental Science & Technology. 47 (9): 4653–4660. Bibcode:2013EnST...47.4653N. doi:10.1021/es3043559. ISSN   0013-936X. PMID   23528100.
  33. "materialflows.net" . Retrieved 3 July 2011.
  34. Daniel B. Müller, Stock dynamics for forecasting material flows--Case study for housing in The Netherlands, Ecological Economics 59(1), 2006, pp 142-156, doi : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.025.
  35. Nakamura, Shinichiro; Kondo, Yasushi; Kagawa, Shigemi; Matsubae, Kazuyo; Nakajima, Kenichi; Nagasaka, Tetsuya (2014-07-01). "MaTrace: Tracing the Fate of Materials over Time and Across Products in Open-Loop Recycling". Environmental Science & Technology. 48 (13): 7207–7214. Bibcode:2014EnST...48.7207N. doi: 10.1021/es500820h . ISSN   0013-936X. PMID   24872019.
  36. Pauliuk, Stefan; Kondo, Yasushi; Nakamura, Shinichiro; Nakajima, Kenichi (2017-01-01). "Regional distribution and losses of end-of-life steel throughout multiple product life cycles—Insights from the global multiregional MaTrace model". Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 116: 84–93. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.029. ISSN   0921-3449. PMC   5302007 . PMID   28216806.
  37. Godoy León, María Fernanda; Blengini, Gian Andrea; Dewulf, Jo (2020-07-01). "Cobalt in end-of-life products in the EU, where does it end up? - The MaTrace approach". Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 158: 104842. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104842. ISSN   0921-3449. PMC   7185230 . PMID   32624643.
  38. Jarrín Jácome, Gabriela; Godoy León, María Fernanda; Alvarenga, Rodrigo A. F.; Dewulf, Jo (2021). "Tracking the Fate of Aluminium in the EU Using the MaTrace Model". Resources. 10 (7): 72. doi: 10.3390/resources10070072 . hdl: 1854/LU-8721110 . ISSN   2079-9276.
  39. Klose, Stefanie; Pauliuk, Stefan (2021). "Quantifying longevity and circularity of copper for different resource efficiency policies at the material and product levels". Journal of Industrial Ecology. 25 (4): 979–993. Bibcode:2021JInEc..25..979K. doi:10.1111/jiec.13092. ISSN   1088-1980.
  40. Nakamura, Shinichiro; Kondo, Yasushi; Nakajima, Kenichi; Ohno, Hajime; Pauliuk, Stefan (2017-09-05). "Quantifying Recycling and Losses of Cr and Ni in Steel Throughout Multiple Life Cycles Using MaTrace-Alloy". Environmental Science & Technology. 51 (17): 9469–9476. Bibcode:2017EnST...51.9469N. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01683 . ISSN   0013-936X. PMID   28806506.
  41. Helbig, Christoph; Kondo, Yasushi; Nakamura, Shinichiro (2022). "Simultaneously tracing the fate of seven metals at a global level with MaTrace-multi". Journal of Industrial Ecology. 26 (3): 923–936. Bibcode:2022JInEc..26..923H. doi:10.1111/jiec.13219. ISSN   1088-1980.
  42. "3R in Japan" . Retrieved 3 July 2011.
  43. Gao, Jiyao; You, Fengqi (2018). "Dynamic Material Flow Analysis-Based Life Cycle Optimization Framework and Application to Sustainable Design of Shale Gas Energy Systems". ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 6 (9): 11734–11752. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01983. S2CID   105839057.

Further reading