Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc.

Last updated

Mattel v. MCA Records
Seal of the United States Courts, Ninth Judicial Circuit.svg
Court United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Full case nameMattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc.
ArguedDecember 5, 2000
DecidedJuly 24, 2002
Citation(s)296 F.3d 894 (9th Cir. 2002)
Case history
Prior historyAppeal from C.D. Cal. (28 F.Supp.2d 1120)
Subsequent historyRequest for certiorari , S.Ct.; denied (537 U.S. 1171).
Holding
Barbie Girl is protected as a parody under the trademark doctrine of nominative use and under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Dorothy Nelson, Melvin Brunetti, Alex Kozinski
Case opinions
MajorityKozinski, joined by unanimous court
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend I; Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq)

Mattel v. MCA Records, 296 F.3d 894 (9th Cir. 2002), [1] was a series of lawsuits between Mattel and MCA Records that resulted from the 1997 hit single "Barbie Girl" by Danish-Norwegian group Aqua. [2] The case was ultimately dismissed.

Contents

Background

On September 11, 1997, Mattel filed suit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, bringing 11 claims against MCA (Aqua's American record label) and others. [3] Mattel claimed the song violated the Barbie trademark and turned Barbie into a sex object, referring to her as a "Blonde Bimbo." [4] They alleged the song had violated their copyrights and trademarks of Barbie, and that its lyrics had tarnished the reputation of their trademark and impinged on their marketing plan. Mattel also claimed that the cover packaging of the single used Barbie pink, a registered trademark owned by Mattel. [5] MCA contested Mattel's claims and filed a counterclaim for defamation after Mattel had likened MCA to a bank robber. [6] MCA's lawyers also cited the earlier Bild Lilli doll — a German adult novelty toy which served as the basis for the original Barbie dolls — in their defense against Mattel's claims that Aqua sexualized the doll. [7]

MCA moved to dismiss Mattel's complaint for failure to state a claim, which the Central District of California granted. Mattel then appealed to the Ninth Circuit. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit ruled the song was protected as a parody under the trademark doctrine of nominative use and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, in an opinion penned by Judge Alex Kozinski; in reaching that result the court adopted the Rogers test set out by the Second Circuit in Rogers v. Grimaldi for use of trademarks in expressive works. The Ninth Circuit also dismissed MCA's defamation counterclaim. Kozinski concluded his ruling by saying, "The parties are advised to chill." [8] [9] Mattel sought certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States, but its petition was denied. [10]

Response

The controversy was used as an example by journalist Naomi Klein in her book No Logo , where she stated that the monopolies created by copyrights and trademarks are unfairly and differently enforced, based on the legal budgets of the conflicting parties.

In 2009, as part of a marketing strategy to revive sales, Mattel released a promotional video featuring a version of "Barbie Girl" with modified lyrics. [11] [12] In 2023, the soundtrack of the Mattel-produced film Barbie included the song "Barbie World" by rappers Nicki Minaj and Ice Spice, which samples Aqua's single. [13]

In a 2023 interview with Rolling Stone , the band recalled how the controversy only served to provide free publicity to both sides of the case despite Mattel's attempts to suppress the song on the grounds of trademark infringement. [7] When asked about Mattel licensing the song to promote the Barbie brand, Aqua's lawyer Russell Frackman saw the irony in Mattel demanding the band to license the rights to use the brand for the song, only for Mattel themselves to license the rights to use the song from MCA. Nystrøm agreed, opining that "that’s what they should have done from the start." [14] Mattel has also since spoken positively about the song, stating that “We love the song and seeing the brand celebrated in pop culture.” [7]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mattel</span> American multinational toy manufacturing and entertainment company

Mattel, Inc. is an American multinational toy manufacturing and entertainment company founded in Los Angeles by Harold Matson and the husband-and-wife duo of Ruth and Elliot Handler in January 1945 and headquartered in El Segundo, California. Mattel has a presence in 35 countries and territories; its products are sold in more than 150 countries. Mattel consists of three business segments: North America, International and American Girl.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barbie</span> Fashion doll brand by Mattel

Barbie is a fashion doll created by American businesswoman Ruth Handler, manufactured by American toy company Mattel and launched in 1959. The toy is the figurehead of the Barbie brand that includes a range of fashion dolls and accessories. Barbie has been an important part of the toy fashion doll market for over six decades. Mattel has sold over a billion Barbie dolls, making it the company's largest and most profitable line. The brand has expanded into a multimedia franchise since the late 1980s, including video games, computer-animated films, and a live-action film.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bratz</span> American fashion doll and media franchise

Bratz is an American fashion doll and media franchise created by former Mattel employee Carter Bryant for MGA Entertainment, which debuted in 2001.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alex Kozinski</span> American judge

Alex Kozinski is a Romanian-American jurist and lawyer who was a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from 1985 to 2017. He was a prominent and influential judge, and many of his law clerks went on to clerk for U.S. Supreme Court justices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aqua (band)</span> Danish eurodance group

Aqua is a Danish-Norwegian Europop band, best known for their 1997 single "Barbie Girl". The group formed in 1995 as Joyspeed, and achieved international success around the globe in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The band released three albums: Aquarium in 1997, Aquarius in 2000 and Megalomania in 2011. The group sold an estimated 33 million albums and singles, making them the most profitable Danish band ever.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M. Margaret McKeown</span> American judge

Mary Margaret McKeown is a Senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit based in San Diego. McKeown has served on the Ninth Circuit since her confirmation in 1998.

<i>Mattel Inc v 3894207 Canada Inc</i> Canadian Supreme Court case about trademark names

Mattel Inc v 3894207 Canada Inc[2006] 1 S.C.R. 772, 2006 SCC 22 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the infringement of famous trade-mark names. The Court found that Mattel Inc. could not enforce the use of their trade-marked name "BARBIE" against a restaurant named "Barbie's".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sindy</span> Fashion doll made in the United Kingdom

Sindy is a British fashion doll created by Pedigree Dolls & Toys in 1963. A rival to Barbie, Sindy's look and range of fashions and accessories made her the best-selling toy in the United Kingdom in 1968 and 1970. After Marx Toys' unsuccessful attempt to introduce Sindy in the United States in the late 1970s, Hasbro bought the rights to Sindy and remodelled the doll to look more American. As a result, the doll's popularity declined; in addition Barbie manufacturer Mattel filed a lawsuit for copyright infringement, which was settled when Hasbro agreed to remodel Sindy's face. During the 1990s, Barbie's share of the doll market continued to grow while Sindy's diminished, which led to Sindy being delisted from major retailers in 1997. Hasbro returned the doll's licence to Pedigree, and the doll was relaunched in 1999, manufactured by Vivid Imaginations. Sindy's 40th anniversary in 2003 saw a new manufacturer, New Moons, and another relaunch and redesign. There was a further relaunch in 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barbie Girl</span> 1997 single by Aqua

"Barbie Girl" is a song by Danish-Norwegian dance-pop group Aqua. It was released in April 1997 as the third single from the group's debut studio album, Aquarium (1997). The song was written by band members Søren Rasted, Claus Norreen, René Dif, and Lene Nystrøm, and was produced by the former two alongside Johnny Jam and Delgado. It was written after Rasted saw an exhibit on kitsch culture in Denmark that featured Barbie dolls.

Inwood Laboratories Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc., 456 U.S. 844 (1982), is a United States Supreme Court case, in which the Court confirmed the application of and set out a test for contributory trademark liability under § 32 of the Lanham Act.

The Columbia Journal of Transnational Law is a law review edited and published by students at Columbia Law School. The journal publishes scholarly articles and student notes on issues of transnational law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barbie World</span> 2023 single by Nicki Minaj and Ice Spice with Aqua

"Barbie World" is a song by Trinidadian rapper Nicki Minaj and American rapper Ice Spice from Barbie: The Album, the soundtrack of the film Barbie (2023). It was released by Atlantic Records, 10K Projects, and Capitol Records as the soundtrack's second single on June 23, 2023, and was serviced to United States radio on June 27, 2023. The song heavily samples the 1997 single "Barbie Girl" by Danish Europop band Aqua, who are credited as performers and co-writers in the song.

Under Canadian trade-mark law, "confusion" is where a trade-mark is similar enough to another trade-mark to cause consumers to equate them. Likelihood of confusion plays a central role in trade-mark registration, infringement and passing-off. Whether a trade-mark or trade-name is confusing is a question of fact. The role of confusion in trade-mark law is analogous to the role of substantial infringement in patent law.

Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that, under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act, a claim of trademark dilution requires proof of actual dilution, not merely a likelihood of dilution. This decision was later superseded by the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 (TDRA).

Tom Forsythe is an American artist and Tai Chi instructor who lives and works in Utah. He is known for his photographic work of Barbie dolls, which caused some controversy resulting from a lawsuit brought against him by Mattel. The company lost the case, Mattel Inc. v. Walking Mountain Prods., when the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the images were original artwork in 2004.

Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp., 382 U.S. 172 (1965), was a 1965 decision of the United States Supreme Court that held, for the first time, that enforcement of a fraudulently procured patent violated the antitrust laws and provided a basis for a claim of treble damages if it caused a substantial anticompetitive effect.

Matal v. Tam, 582 U.S. 218 (2017) is a Supreme Court of the United States case that affirmed unanimously the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that the provisions of the Lanham Act prohibiting registration of trademarks that may "disparage" persons, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols with the United States Patent and Trademark Office violated the First Amendment.

<i>Mattel Inc. v. Walking Mountain Prods.</i> Legal case regarding copyrights

Mattel Inc. v. Walking Mountain Productions, 353 F.3d 792, was a case between Mattel and Tom Forsythe in which Mattel sued Forsythe for the production and sale of photographs portraying "Barbie" dolls. Mattel alleged that Forsythe's use of Barbie's name and likeness in his "Food Chain Barbie" photo series infringed on their copyrights, trademarks, and trade dress. The court held that Mattel's trademark and trade dress claims were "groundless or unreasonable" and therefore ordered Mattel to pay 1.8 million dollars in legal fees to Forsythe under the Lanham Act.

Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc., 535 U.S. 826 (2002), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

References

  1. ↑ "Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc., 296 F.3d 894 | Casetext Search + Citator". casetext.com. Retrieved March 23, 2021.
  2. ↑ AquaVEVO (August 20, 2010). "Aqua - Barbie Girl". YouTube . Archived from the original on December 20, 2021. Retrieved December 7, 2017.
  3. ↑ "Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc". September 12, 1997.
  4. ↑ "Aqua Now Faces Lawsuit Over "Barbie Girl"". MTV News . Viacom International Inc. September 12, 1997. Retrieved February 21, 2020.
  5. ↑ "Cover Midge's Ears. Mattel Isn't Happy With The Racy Lyrics From A Danish Band". Orlando Sentinel . September 17, 1997. Retrieved February 26, 2012.
  6. ↑ "Supreme Court rejects ugly fight over Barbie doll". Associated Press . January 27, 2003. Retrieved August 8, 2007– via Billings Gazette.
  7. 1 2 3 Hassan, Jennifer (June 26, 2023). "Remember the 'Barbie Girl' song? Mattel actually sued, but was told 'to chill.'". Washington Post. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
  8. ↑ Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc., 296F.3d894 (9th Cir.2002).
  9. ↑ "Barbie loses battle over bimbo image". BBC News . July 25, 2002. Retrieved August 8, 2007.
  10. ↑ Mattel Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc., no. 02-633, U.S. Supreme Court (Jan. 27, 2003)(order)
  11. ↑ "Official Barbie Web Site". Mattel . Retrieved September 4, 2009.
  12. ↑ Elliott, Stuart (August 26, 2009). "Years Later, Mattel Embraces Barbie Girl". The New York Times . Retrieved July 11, 2010.
  13. ↑ Dean, Grace (July 18, 2023). "Mattel Hated the 1997 Song 'Barbie Girl' So Much That It Sued. Now, the Song is Making a Return Thanks to Greta Gerwig". Business Insider . Retrieved July 20, 2023.
  14. ↑ Greene, Andy (April 1, 2022). "'People Probably Want to Kill Us': The Oral History of Aqua's 'Barbie Girl'". Rolling Stone. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.