Mental toughness

Last updated

Mental toughness is a measure of individual resilience and confidence that may predict success in sport, education, and the workplace. [1] The concept emerged in the context of sports training, as one of a set of attributes that allow a person to become a better athlete and able to cope with difficult training and difficult competitive situations and emerge without losing confidence. The term has been used by coaches, sport psychologists, sports commentators, and business leaders.

Contents

Mental toughness can be thought of as the applications of grit characteristics.[ citation needed ] Additional synonyms might include: resilience, determined, strong-willed, and stalwart. A person who has the qualities of mental toughness might accept challenges as they arise aiding them to achieve their goals whether that be in sports, academics, or in their professions.

Definition

"Mental toughness" is frequently used colloquially to refer to any set of positive mental attributes that helps a person to cope with difficult situations. Coaches and sport commentators freely use the term mental toughness to describe the mental state of athletes who persevere through difficult sport circumstances, such as playing while hurt, to succeed. In support of this, a number of studies have linked mental toughness to sporting success or achievement.[ citation needed ] However, the phrase is often simply applied as a default explanation for any victory. Criticisms about this imprecise use of this term abound. [2]

Scientific research has attempted a formal definition of mental toughness as a psychological construct with clear measurement criteria, which would allow robust analyses and comparisons to be made.

In particular, three research teams produced both a definition and a construct definition for mental toughness: being able to push past failures or blockades by remaining positive and competitive. This involves training the mind to be ready for challenges.

Jones, Hanton, and Connaughton

Graham Jones, Sheldon Hanton, and Declan Connaughton of the United States used personal construct psychology in interviews with elite athletes, as well as elite-level coaches and sport psychologists, to arrive at the following definition of mental toughness:

Having the natural or developed psychological edge that enables you to: generally, cope better than your opponents with the many demands (competition, training, lifestyle) that sport places on a performer; specifically, be more consistent and better than your opponents in remaining determined, focused, confident, and in control under pressure. [3] : 209 

These same researchers published a second paper which provided four dimensions (categories) for mental toughness attributes: a general dimension of a performer's attitude or mindset (specifically, the performer's focus and self-belief), and three time-specific dimensions: training, competition, and post-competition. These time-specific dimensions contain attributes of mental toughness (such as handling pressure, handling failure, and pushing yourself to your physical limit in training) that pertain to their use at those times. [4]

Clough and Earle

Peter Clough et al. [5] proposed a model of mental toughness that conceptualizes it as a personality trait. Their model has four components: confidence, challenge, control, and commitment. They developed a questionnaire by which to measure mental toughness. [6] They combined existing psychological theory and applied sport psychology in an attempt to bridge the gap between research and practice. They saw comparisons between their emerging mental toughness data and the concept of hardiness, a key individual difference and resistance resource that helps buffer stress and has become an accepted concept in health psychology within the study of the stress-illness relationship. They believe mental toughness has broad application and should not be limited to the sports domain. They feel that sports-specific measures are unlikely to move the field forward in any meaningful ways. The development work relating to their model is fully described and discussed in their book on mental toughness. [7]

Gucciardi, Gordon, and Dimmock

Daniel Gucciardi, Sandy Gordon, and James Dimmock of Australia have proposed a different definition and framework of mental toughness, based primarily on their work with Australian footballers. Using personal construct psychology, these authors proposed the following definition of mental toughness:

Mental toughness in Australian Football is a collection of values, attitudes, behaviors, and emotions that enable you to persevere and overcome any obstacle, adversity, or pressure experienced, but also to maintain concentration and motivation when things are going well to consistently achieve your goals. [8] : 278 

Although this definition was produced through work with Australian footballers, it has been generalized to other sports, including cricket [9] [10] and soccer. [11] This definition conceives mental toughness as having reactive and proactive qualities; players can use mental toughness attributes to help endure and perform well during adverse situations, but can also employ other attributes of mental toughness when the game is going well, to keep them playing at their best.

Studies

Some psychologists argued that a separate, sport-specific definition of mental toughness should be developed. [12] The attributes of a mentally tough athlete in one sport may differ greatly from the attributes of a mentally tough athlete in a different sport. Differences have also been hypothesized between male and female athletes, and between "team sport" and "individual sport" athletes, but to date, little empirical evidence has shown what these differences are.

Sport-specific studies of mental toughness have been conducted in cricket, [9] [10] [13] soccer, [11] [14] gymnastics, [15] and Australian football. [8] [16] [17] [18] These studies have not employed a common framework, although many have used the definition of mental toughness provided by either the Jones et al. study or the Gucciardi et al. study.

Many sports-focused studies employed the Clough model of mental toughness. They use samples of athletes to investigate a possible link between toughness, coping, emotional reactivity, psychological skills, and performance. [19]

One of the few published studies that takes mental toughness out of the sporting domain is based on the 4 'C's model. This study showed that senior managers are tougher than their junior colleagues. [20] Clough and his team are working in a number of areas outside of sport—education, health, social, and occupational—to explore the relevance of mental toughness in these areas.

In 2019, a study using a personality assessment identified six personality traits of top NCAA Division 1 and professional athletes that define mental toughness. This study also highlighted that the traits that make up mental toughness and that predict athletic success are some of the same traits seen in the most successful sales professionals. [21]

In April 2020, researchers found that top gamers shared the ability to cope with stressors as well as Olympian athletes. [22]

Mental toughness can also be found in the workplace. It's been found that when those in positions of influence instill mental toughness in their team members, those team members are more productive, take less sick leave, and work better together when collaboration arises. [23]

Developmental studies

There is debate about whether mental toughness is primarily a developed characteristic, or has a genetic basis. Two studies suggest that foundational processes occur during development that allow a person to build mental toughness throughout life. For instance, a study of American soccer players, parents, and coaches found that parents provide a "generalized form" of mental toughness upon which coaches can build a sport-specific form of mental toughness. [11] A similar study suggested that mental toughness development proceeds first through the development of a tough attitude (strong focus and strong self-belief); upon a tough attitude, an athlete learns how to develop mental toughness attributes needed for training, then for competition. [24] Another study examined the developmental experiences of ten super-elite athletes and found that coaches and significant adults played an important role in mental toughness development through all stages of talent development. [25]

Horsburgh et al. demonstrated that genetic and non-shared environmental factors contribute to the development of mental toughness (as measured by questionnaire), and that mental toughness behaves "in the same manner as virtually every personality trait that has ever been investigated in behavioural genetic study". [26] : 104  In establishing significant relationships with the big five personality factors of Costa and McCrae (1992),[ full citation needed ] these researchers have also provided evidence to support Clough et al.’s conceptualisation of mental toughness. [26] While embracing the importance of genetics, Clough acknowledges that mental toughness can be developed. [27]

Studies with Sports

A research study analyzed how kids with mental toughness performed compared to those without the trait. Of randomly-selected people the researchers found that the mentally tough athletes were better in their sport. There were five reoccurring themes with the athletes that possessed mental toughness.

  1. The athletes proved and showed their mental toughness by overcoming obstacles and not getting down on themselves when things did not go their way.
  2. The athletes who were mentally tough were much more self driven to do well in their given sport and were self determined.
  3. The mentally tough were able to control their emotions while playing the sport.
  4. The mentally tough focus on ways to become better at their sport in ways where they do not get all the glory. They will do things that help their team win that most people may not notice such as giving an assist in basketball.
  5. Mentally tough athletes are good teammates, they are not selfish. They will do whatever it takes to win. They do not care about the glory, they just do whatever it takes for their team to succeed.

Mental Toughness in the Workplace

A study by done Ruparel, [28] Namita, et al has found that the relationship between mental toughness and more job demand has led to better authentic happiness.

Additionally, it has been found that employees with higher levels of mental toughness may experience lower levels of stress than their colleagues. Further, lower stress levels and higher abilities to cope can lead to increases in job performance. Individuals in the workplace may become proficient if the skill of being mentally tough is taught and reiterated. [29]

Mental Toughness in the Military

There is limited research and methods by which one can measure for mental toughness. However the military has been a great population by which research has been conducted in order to better understand this mindset. [30]

One of these studies was conducted by Smith et al. who looked at active-duty Airman's decreased suicidal rates in relation to those who had a support group and mental toughness. Their efforts to scale mental toughness came from the Mental Toughness Psychological Skills Profile (MTPSP; Asken 2005). They found that there could be a link between suicidal ideations decreasing when social groups were present, which those social groups helped facilitate mental toughness and self-confidence. [30]

In an effort to better understand how to test for mental toughness Arthur et al. developed and tested for a scale in hopes to better understand and define mental toughness through a study with military recruits, the scale is known as the Military Training Mental Toughness Inventory (MTMTI). [31] Over the span of three studies, Fitzwater et al. claim it to have proper psychometric properties, good reliability (tested through test-retest methods) concurrent validity and could be used as a decent predictor of performance. [31]

Academics and Mental toughness

St Clair-Thompson found that mental toughness plays a significant role in academics. [32] Mental toughness is positively associated with increases in academic attainment and attendance. It also plays a positive role in school behavior and peer relationships. [32] Mental toughness in academics is often incorrectly assumed to be the same thing as Grit. Mental toughness and Grit are similar, but they are not the same thing. Grit is having patience and perseverance to complete a long term goal. Mental toughness refers to a mental state capable of being meaningful, purposeful, and flexible when trying to achieve a goal. [33] Both play a part in academic achievement.

On average, mentally tough people deal with academic anxiety more positively, by using coping mechanisms rather than avoidance techniques. [34] [35] Mental toughness acts as a mediator between academic anxiety and academic avoidance, which allows individuals to be more successful in academic endeavors. [34] Due to mental toughness being a state of mind, it can be improved when practiced. [33]

Like Grit, resilience is often used interchangeably with mental toughness. It has a similar meaning, but once again, they are not the same. [36] Stock states that mental toughness must be paired with resilience, but resilience can exist without mental toughness. In academics, mental toughness can be measured through confidence and positive attitudes during difficulties. [36] Men usually report higher Mental toughness than women, but recent evidence suggests that mental toughness may be expressed differently between genders. Especially in an academic environment. [36] [37] Maintaining mental toughness and a feeling of control is correlated with higher academic performance in both men and women. [36]

Similar constructs

Mental toughness has been equated with better-understood constructs from psychology such as resilience and hardiness.

The term resilience is often incorrectly used interchangeably with mental toughness, though researchers have found the two constructs are positively associated with one another. [38] However, psychologists define resilience as a positive adaptive process of coping with stress and adversity, as opposed to a collection of psychological attributes or personality traits.[ dubious – discuss ]

Hardiness has been suggested as a similar construct to mental toughness. Hardiness has typically been constructed as a stable personality trait. This differs from the conceptions of mental toughness offered by both Jones et al. and Gucciardi et al. Those authors conceive of mental toughness as unstable, arising in development, fluctuating over time, and varying for an individual performer between different sport and life scenarios.

This definitional dilemma plagues the use of the term mental toughness. In addition, if mental toughness exists as a valid construct it may on occasion be maladaptive. Evidence to support this contention is derived from a study of overtraining behaviors and mental toughness. The author reported: "The results suggest that some attributes of MT may relate to increased ability to recover whereas other attributes are associated with lower recovery... Arguably mental toughness is more closely linked with goal fixedness rather than adaptability and a flexible mindset, attributes which are central to resilience." [39]

Measurement

Two instruments have been developed and validated since 2009. Gucciardi et al. validated the American Football Mental Toughness Inventory (AFMTI), [17] while Sheard and Golby validated the Sports Mental Toughness Questionnaire (SMTQ). [40] The MTQ48 predates these by seven years. The factor structure of the MTQ48 has been supported by an independent research group. [26] Dr Lee Crust, University of Lincoln, compared the SMTQ with the MTQ48 and concluded "Both instruments appear to tap the core components of MT but the MTQ48 seemingly provides a more comprehensive measure". [41]

The MTQ48 questionnaire has demonstrable criterion-related, construct, and content validity. Reliability has been assessed by numerous independent researchers and it has demonstrable internal consistency and test-retest reliability.{ [42] All component scales exceed 0.70 and the overall measure has a reliability in excess of 0.90.[ citation needed ]Specifically for self-efficacy results show r = .68, p < .01. [42] While this is on the higher end, (.7) tends to be the standard minimum for research purposes. Nevertheless, both the construct validity and the psychometric properties of this test have been questioned. [43]

Several other instruments purport to measure mental toughness, but research has called their validity into question. For example, the Performance Profile Inventory (PPI) developed by Jim Loehr used seven subscales to compute a mental toughness score. The Mental Toughness Inventory (MTI) developed by Middleton et al. measures mental toughness using twelve subscales and appears to show strong theoretical evidence for its formation. However, construct validation has only been performed with a narrow sample of athletes, leaving its psychometric properties up for debate. [40]

See also

Related Research Articles

Psychometrics is a field of study within psychology concerned with the theory and technique of measurement. Psychometrics generally covers specialized fields within psychology and education devoted to testing, measurement, assessment, and related activities. Psychometrics is concerned with the objective measurement of latent constructs that cannot be directly observed. Examples of latent constructs include intelligence, introversion, mental disorders, and educational achievement. The levels of individuals on nonobservable latent variables are inferred through mathematical modeling based on what is observed from individuals' responses to items on tests and scales.

Amusement is the state of experiencing humorous and entertaining events or situations while the person or animal actively maintains the experience, and is associated with enjoyment, happiness, laughter and pleasure. It is an emotion with positive valence and high physiological arousal.

Stereotype threat is a situational predicament in which people are or feel themselves to be at risk of conforming to stereotypes about their social group. It is theorized to be a contributing factor to long-standing racial and gender gaps in academic performance. Since its introduction into the academic literature, stereotype threat has become one of the most widely studied topics in the field of social psychology.

Confidence is the feeling of belief or trust that a person or thing is reliable. Self-confidence is trust in oneself. Self-confidence involves a positive belief that one can generally accomplish what one wishes to do in the future. Self-confidence is not the same as self-esteem, which is an evaluation of one's worth. Self-confidence is related to self-efficacy—belief in one's ability to accomplish a specific task or goal. Confidence can be a self-fulfilling prophecy, as those without it may fail because they lack it, and those with it may succeed because they have it rather than because of an innate ability or skill.

Psychological resilience is the ability to cope mentally and emotionally with a crisis, or to return to pre-crisis status quickly.

Neuroticism is a personality trait associated with negative emotions. It is one of the Big Five traits. Individuals with high scores on neuroticism are more likely than average to experience such feelings as anxiety, worry, fear, anger, frustration, envy, jealousy, pessimism, guilt, depressed mood, and loneliness. Such people are thought to respond worse to stressors and are more likely to interpret ordinary situations, such as minor frustrations, as appearing hopelessly difficult. Their behavioral responses may include procrastination, substance use, and other maladaptive behaviors, which may aid in relieving negative emotions and generating positive ones.

Positive illusions are unrealistically favorable attitudes that people have towards themselves or to people that are close to them. Positive illusions are a form of self-deception or self-enhancement that feel good; maintain self-esteem; or avoid discomfort, at least in the short term. There are three general forms: inflated assessment of one's own abilities, unrealistic optimism about the future, and an illusion of control. The term "positive illusions" originates in a 1988 paper by Taylor and Brown. "Taylor and Brown's (1988) model of mental health maintains that certain positive illusions are highly prevalent in normal thought and predictive of criteria traditionally associated with mental health."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stereotype</span> Generalized but fixed and oversimplified image or idea of a particular type of person or thing

In social psychology, a stereotype is a generalized belief about a particular category of people. It is an expectation that people might have about every person of a particular group. The type of expectation can vary; it can be, for example, an expectation about the group's personality, preferences, appearance or ability. Stereotypes are often overgeneralized, inaccurate, and resistant to new information. A stereotype does not necessarily need to be a negative assumption. They may be positive, neutral, or negative.

In psychology, posttraumatic growth (PTG) is positive psychological change experienced as a result of struggling with highly challenging, highly stressful life circumstances. These circumstances represent significant challenges to the adaptive resources of the individual, and pose significant challenges to the individual's way of understanding the world and their place in it. Posttraumatic growth involves "life-changing" psychological shifts in thinking and relating to the world and the self, that contribute to a personal process of change, that is deeply meaningful.

In psychology, grit is a positive, non-cognitive trait based on a person's perseverance of effort combined with their passion for a particular long-term goal or end state. This perseverance of effort helps people overcome obstacles or challenges to accomplishment and drives people to achieve.

Sport psychology was defined by the European Federation of Sport Psychology (FEPSAC) in 1996, as the study of the psychological basis, processes, and effects of sport. Otherwise, sport is considered as any physical activity where the individuals engage for competition and health. Sport psychology is recognized as an interdisciplinary science that draws on knowledge from many related fields including biomechanics, physiology, kinesiology and psychology. It involves the study of how psychological factors affect performance and how participation in sport and exercise affect psychological and physical factors. Sport psychologists teach cognitive and behavioral strategies to athletes in order to improve their experience and performance in sports.

Attention seeking behavior is to act in a way that is likely to elicit attention. Attention seeking behavior is defined in the DSM-5 as "engaging in behavior designed to attract notice and to make oneself the focus of others' attention and admiration". This definition does not ascribe a motivation to the behavior and assumes a human actor, although the term "attention seeking" sometimes also assumes a motive of seeking validation. People are thought to engage in both positive and negative attention seeking behavior independent of the actual benefit or harm to health. In line with much research and a dynamic self-regulatory processing model of narcissism, motivations for attention seeking are considered to be driven by self-consciousness and thus an externalization of personality rather than internal and self-motivated behavior. Attention seeking is often caused by threats to one's self-concept and the need for social acceptance. This type of influence on behavior can result in a potential loss of a person's sense of agency, personality disorder and the behavior associated with these conditions.

Psychological hardiness, alternatively referred to as personality hardiness or cognitive hardiness in the literature, is a personality style first introduced by Suzanne C. Kobasa in 1979. Kobasa described a pattern of personality characteristics that distinguished managers and executives who remained healthy under life stress, as compared to those who developed health problems. In the following years, the concept of hardiness was further elaborated in a book and a series of research reports by Salvatore Maddi, Kobasa and their graduate students at the University of Chicago.

Self-concealment is a psychological construct defined as "a predisposition to actively conceal from others personal information that one perceives as distressing or negative". Its opposite is self-disclosure.

The theory of narrative identity postulates that individuals form an identity by integrating their life experiences into an internalized, evolving story of the self that provides the individual with a sense of unity and purpose in life. This life narrative integrates one's reconstructed past, perceived present, and imagined future. Furthermore, this narrative is a story – it has characters, episodes, imagery, a setting, plots, and themes and often follows the traditional model of a story, having a beginning, middle, and an end (denouement). Narrative identity is the focus of interdisciplinary research, with deep roots in psychology.

Sports hypnosis refers to the use of hypnotherapy with athletes in order to enhance sporting performance. Hypnosis in sports has therapeutic and performance-enhancing functions. The mental state of athletes during training and competition is said to impact performance. Hypnosis is a form of mental training and can therefore contribute to enhancing athletic execution. Sports hypnosis is used by athletes, coaches and psychologists.

Mental health refers to a person's mental state, well-being, and ability to cope with the daily stresses of life. Good mental health also means that one has the ability to be mentally resilient, have a good life balance, having an absence of mental disorders and the ability to enjoy life. Elite athletes such as those competing in the Australian Football League(AFL), are at higher risk of developing a mental health disorders such as depression, anxiety, social anxiety, panic attacks and eating disorders. 16–34 years olds are also in the high risk category, which is the average age of a football player and extends to those who are being drafted, this puts AFL players in both high risk categories. A study conducted by Helen Christensen and Alison Parsons showed that 1 in 5 elite athletes suffered depressive symptoms. Playing elite sports is a great challenge emotionally, mentally as well as physically, some players can cope with all of these pressures while others cannot handle it and therefore suffer from a lack of mental health.

Dov Shmotkin is Professor Emeritus in the School of Psychological Sciences and Head of the Herczeg Institute on Aging at Tel Aviv University.

Academic buoyancy is a type of resilience relating specifically to academic attainment. It is defined as 'the ability of students to successfully deal with academic setbacks and challenges that are ‘typical of the ordinary course of school life '. It is, therefore, related to traditional definitions of resilience but allows a narrower focus in order to target interventions more precisely. The academic buoyancy model was first proposed by psychologists Andrew Martin and Herbert W. Marsh, following the identification of significant differences between classic resilience and the day-to-day setbacks experienced by students.

Athletic identity is a part of self-identity and can be defined as the level, to which one identifies with the role of an athlete. It is a self-concept that is constructed from information processed by the individual and influences both input and output of information related to the self. For athletes and people that are actively involved in sports, athletic identity is a major part of their self and they can satisfy the need of their athletic identity by taking part in sports. Athletic identity increases with the level of involvement in sports, and strong athletic identity correlates positively with athletic achievements, as well as with higher motivation and competitiveness. Changes, such as a decline, in athletic identity facilitate adjustment to everyday life.

References

  1. ↑ Lin, Ying; Mutz, Julian; Clough, Peter J.; Papageorgiou, Kostas A. (2017-08-11). "Mental Toughness and Individual Differences in Learning, Educational and Work Performance, Psychological Well-being, and Personality: A Systematic Review". Frontiers in Psychology. 8: 1345. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01345 . ISSN   1664-1078. PMC   5554528 . PMID   28848466.
  2. ↑ e.g. Moran, A. P. (2012). Sport and Exercise Psychology: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  3. ↑ Jones, G.; Hanton, S.; Connaughton, D. (2002). "What Is This Thing Called Mental Toughness? An Investigation of Elite Sport Performers". Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 14 (3): 205–218. doi:10.1080/10413200290103509. S2CID   143788691.
  4. ↑ Jones, G.; Hanton, S.; Connaughton, D. (2007). "A framework of mental toughness in the world's best performers". The Sport Psychologist. 21 (2): 243–264. doi:10.1123/tsp.21.2.243. hdl: 10369/501 .
  5. ↑ Clough, P. J.; Earle, K.; Sewell, D. (2002). "Mental Toughness. The Concept and its Management". In Cockerill, I. (ed.). Solutions in Sport Psychology. London: Thomson. pp. 32–45.
  6. ↑ Clough, P. J., Marchant, D. C., & Earle, K. (2007). Mental toughness Questionnaire 48: Technical manual. Wrexham: AQR.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. ↑ Clough, P.J.; Strycharczyk, D. (2012). Applied mental toughness: A tool kit for the 21st Century. Kogan Page. ISBN   978-0-7494-6377-9.
  8. 1 2 Gucciardi, D.; Gordon, S.; Dimmock, J. (2008). "Towards an Understanding of Mental Toughness in American Football". Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 20 (3): 261–281. doi:10.1080/10413200801998556. S2CID   145652482.
  9. 1 2 Gucciardi, D. F.; Gordon, S. (2009). "Development and preliminary validation of the Cricket Mental Toughness Inventory (CMTI)". Journal of Sports Sciences. 27 (12): 1293–310. doi:10.1080/02640410903242306. PMID   19736598. S2CID   23897893.
  10. 1 2 Gucciardi, D. F. (2011). "The relationship between developmental experiences and mental toughness in adolescent cricketers". Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 33 (3): 370–93. doi:10.1123/jsep.33.3.370. PMID   21659669.
  11. 1 2 3 Coulter, T. J.; Mallett, C. J.; Gucciardi, D. F. (2010). "Understanding mental toughness in Australian soccer: perceptions of players, parents, and coaches". Journal of Sports Sciences. 28 (7): 699–716. doi:10.1080/02640411003734085. PMID   20496223. S2CID   2934524.
  12. ↑
  13. ↑ Bull, S.; Shambrook, C.; James, W.; Brooks, J. (2005). "Towards an Understanding of Mental Toughness in Elite English Cricketers". Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 17 (3): 209–227. doi:10.1080/10413200591010085. S2CID   145484578.
  14. ↑ Thelwell, R.; Weston, N.; Greenlees, I. (2005). "Defining and Understanding Mental Toughness within Soccer". Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 17 (4): 326–332. doi:10.1080/10413200500313636. S2CID   143348472.
  15. ↑ Thelwell, R. C.; Such, B. A.; Weston, N. J. V.; Such, J. D.; Greenlees, I. A. (2010). "Developing mental toughness: Perceptions of elite female gymnasts". International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 8 (2): 170–188. doi:10.1080/1612197x.2010.9671941. S2CID   144583372.
  16. ↑ Gucciardi, D. F.; Gordon, S.; Dimmock, J.; Mallett, C. J. (2009). "Understanding the coach's role in the development of mental toughness: perspectives of elite Australian football coaches". Journal of Sports Sciences. 27 (13): 1483–96. doi:10.1080/02640410903150475. PMID   19787540. S2CID   30198334.
  17. 1 2 Gucciardi, D.; Gordon, S.; Dimmock, J. (2009). "Development and preliminary validation of a mental toughness inventory for Australian football". Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 10 (1): 201–209. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.07.011.
  18. ↑
    • Gucciardi, D. F. (2010). "Mental toughness profiles and their relations with achievement goals and sport motivation in adolescent Australian footballers". Journal of Sports Sciences. 28 (6): 615–25. doi:10.1080/02640410903582792. PMID   20391082. S2CID   8754196.
    • Gucciardi, D. F.; Gordon, S.; Dimmock (2009). "Evaluation of a Mental Toughness Training Program for Youth-Aged Australian Footballers: II. A Qualitative Analysis". Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 21 (3): 324–339. doi:10.1080/10413200903026074. S2CID   216152434.
  19. ↑
  20. ↑ Marchant, D.; Polman, R.; Clough, P.J.; Jackson, J.G.; Levy, A.; Nicholls, A.R. (2009). "Mental toughness: Managerial and age differences". Journal of Managerial Psychology. 24 (5): 428–437. doi:10.1108/02683940910959753.
  21. ↑ Schoenfelder, Thomas, "How Mental Toughness Differentiates NCAA Division I and Professional Athletes" (PDF), Caliper Whitepaper, Princeton, N.J.
  22. ↑
  23. ↑ Ruparel, Namita (2020-02-05). "Mental toughness: Promising new paradigms for the workplace". Cogent Psychology. 7 (1). doi: 10.1080/23311908.2020.1722354 . ISSN   2331-1908.
  24. ↑ Connaughton, D.; Hanton, S.; Jones, G. (2010). "The development and maintenance of mental toughness in the World's best performers". The Sport Psychologist. 24 (2): 168–193. doi:10.1123/tsp.24.2.168. hdl: 10369/4088 .
  25. ↑ Connaughton, D.; Wadey, R.; Hanton, S.; Jones, G. (2008). "The development and maintenance of mental toughness: perceptions of elite performers". Journal of Sports Sciences. 26 (1): 83–95. doi:10.1080/02640410701310958. PMID   17852671. S2CID   23040478.
  26. 1 2 3 Horsburgh, V.; Schermer, J.; Veselka, L.; Vernon, P. (2009). "A behavioral genetic study of mental toughness and personality". Personality and Individual Differences. 46 (2): 100–105. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.009.
  27. ↑ Crust, L; Clough, P.J. (2011). "Developing Mental Toughness: From Research to Practice". Journal of Sport Psychology in Action. 2: 21–32. doi:10.1080/21520704.2011.563436. S2CID   145009783.
  28. ↑ Ruparel, Namita; Choubisa, Rajneesh; Seth, Himanshu (2022-05-06). "Imagining positive workplaces: extrapolating relationships between job crafting, mental toughness and authentic happiness in millennial employees". Management Research Review. 45 (5): 599–618. doi:10.1108/MRR-01-2021-0083. ISSN   2040-8269.
  29. ↑ Ruparel, Namita (2020-12-31). Topa, Gabriela (ed.). "Mental toughness: Promising new paradigms for the workplace". Cogent Psychology. 7 (1). doi:10.1080/23311908.2020.1722354. ISSN   2331-1908.
  30. 1 2 Smith, Hilary A.; Wolfe-Clark, Andrea L.; Bryan, Craig J. (2016-12-01). "An Exploratory Study of the Mental Toughness Psychological Skills Profile Psychometrics, and the Mediating Effect of Social Support Sources on Mental Toughness and Suicidal Ideation Among Military Police". Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 31 (4): 295–303. doi:10.1007/s11896-016-9192-y. ISSN   1936-6469.
  31. 1 2 Arthur, Calum A.; Fitzwater, James; Hardy, Lew; Beattie, Stuart; Bell, James (July 2015). "Development and Validation of a Military Training Mental Toughness Inventory". Military Psychology. 27 (4): 232–241. doi:10.1037/mil0000074. ISSN   0899-5605.
  32. 1 2 St Clair-Thompson, Helen; Bugler, Myfanwy; Robinson, Jamey; Clough, Peter; McGeown, Sarah P.; Perry, John (2014-03-11). "Mental toughness in education: exploring relationships with attainment, attendance, behaviour and peer relationships". Educational Psychology. 35 (7): 886–907. doi:10.1080/01443410.2014.895294. ISSN   0144-3410.
  33. 1 2 Stamatis, Andreas; Morgan, Grant B.; Boolani, Ali; Papadakis, Zacharias (2024-02-17). "The Positive Association between Grit and Mental Toughness, Enhanced by a Minimum of 75 Minutes of Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity, among US Students". Psych. 6 (1): 221–235. doi:10.3390/psych6010014. ISSN   2624-8611.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  34. 1 2 Hasty, Leslie M.; Malanchini, Margherita; Shakeshaft, Nicholas; Schofield, Kerry; Malanchini, Maddalena; Wang, Zhe (2020-07-18). "When anxiety becomes my propeller: Mental toughness moderates the relation between academic anxiety and academic avoidance". British Journal of Educational Psychology. 91 (1): 368–390. doi:10.1111/bjep.12366. ISSN   0007-0998.
  35. ↑ Cassady, Jerrell C.; Johnson, Ronald E. (April 2002). "Cognitive Test Anxiety and Academic Performance". Contemporary Educational Psychology. 27 (2): 270–295. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1094. ISSN   0361-476X.
  36. 1 2 3 4 Stock, Rosemary; Lynam, Siobhan; Cachia, Moira (2018-10-12). "Academic success: the role of mental toughness in predicting and creating success". Higher Education Pedagogies. 3 (1): 429–433. doi:10.1080/23752696.2018.1507623. ISSN   2375-2696.
  37. ↑ Nicholls, Adam R.; Polman, Remco C.J.; Levy, Andrew R.; Backhouse, Susan H. (July 2009). "Mental toughness in sport: Achievement level, gender, age, experience, and sport type differences". Personality and Individual Differences. 47 (1): 73–75. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.006. ISSN   0191-8869.
  38. ↑ Cowden, R.G.; Meyer-Weitz, A.; Oppong Asante, K. (2013). "Mental toughness in competitive tennis: Relationships with resilience and stress". Frontiers in Psychology. 7 (320): 320. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00320 . PMC   4791384 . PMID   27014132.
  39. ↑ Tibbert, S. J. (2013). Mental Toughness and Overtraining Behaviours (Ph.D. thesis). Victoria University.
  40. 1 2 Sheard, M.; Golby, J.; van Wersch, A. (2009). "Progress Toward Construct Validation of the Sports Mental Toughness Questionnaire (SMTQ)". European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 25 (3): 186–193. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.25.3.186.
  41. ↑ Crust, L.; Swann, C. (2011). "Comparing two measures of mental toughness" (PDF). Personality and Individual Differences. 50 (2): 217–221. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.032.
  42. 1 2 Birch, P.; Crampton, S.; Greenlees, I.; Lowry, R. G.; Coffee, P. (December 2016). "The mental toughness questionniare-48: A re-examination of Factorial Validity". International Journal of Sport Psychology. doi:10.7352/IJSP.2017.48.331 – via ResearchGate.
  43. ↑ Andersen, M. B. (2011). "Who's mental? Who's tough and who's both? Mutton constructs dressed up as lamb". In Gucciardi, Daniel F.; Gordan, Sandy (eds.). Mental toughness in sport : developments in research and theory. Routledge Research in Sport and Exercise Science. pp. 69–88.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.