Acronyms (colloquial) | NDAA |
---|---|
Legislative history | |
|
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025 (NDAA 2025) is a United States federal law which specifies the budget, expenditures, and policies of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) for fiscal year 2025. [2] [3]
The National Defense Authorization Act is an annual bill proposed in the United States Congress that redefines the United States military budget for the following fiscal year. Each chamber of Congress introduces a version of the NDAA for 2025.
The House introduced H.R. 8070 on April 18 and sent it to the Senate on July 8 for consideration. The Senate Armed Services Committee approved the Senate's version of the bill, on June 14 in a 22–3 vote. [4] [5] Committee Chairman Jack Reed (D ‑ RI) initially voted against the bill, due to disagreement with the decision to increase defense spending $25 billion over the budget cap established by the Fiscal Responsibility Act; Elizabeth Warren (D ‑ MA) and Tom Cotton (R ‑ AR) joined Reed in voting against the bill. The $25 billion spending increase over the cap was due to an amendment introduced by its Ranking Member, Roger Wicker (R ‑ MS). [5] Reed reintroduced a new Senate version as S. 4638 on July 8 which was suspended. Chuck Schumer (D ‑ NY) introduced H.R. 5009, which is a repurposed bill once used for the Wildlife Innovation and Longevity Driver Reauthorization Act.
On May 22, the House Armed Services Committee approved its version of the 2025 National Defense Authorization Act, by a 57–1 vote. [6] As passed by the Committee, the bill included the Pentagon's controversial "Legislative Proposal 480", transferring Air National Guard space units to the Space Force; however, the Committee accepted an amendment proposed by Joe Wilson (R ‑ SC), watering down the Pentagon's proposal by adding a requirement for gubernatorial consent to any such transfers. [6]
On June 14, the United States House of Representatives passed the US$895 billion defense spending bill in a 217–199 vote, with several added socially conservative amendments made by House Republicans that Speaker of the House Mike Johnson approved in order to prevent any hardline Republicans from blocking the bill. [7] All but six House Democrats opposed the bill, while only three House Republicans opposed the bill. Many Democrats criticized the changes and the House Republicans for using the mandatory defense bill to push forward divisive, partisan agendas.
The amendments would block funding to gender-affirming care for transgender members of the United States Armed Forces, [4] for military diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, [4] for teaching of critical race theory at military academies, climate change efforts, and for any future efforts to help bring Palestinian refugees to the United States. The amendments also planned to block an earlier policy that would reimburse travel for troops needing reproductive care or abortions, [4] and planned to defund the Gaza floating pier.
A White House spokesperson condemned the amendments as prioritizing GOP politics over the safety and needs of US troops, and called it "an unserious effort" that would not pass the Senate without several amendments being removed or altered. [8]
On July 8, the Senate Armed Services Committee publicly released its version of the NDAA text, [9] which was revealed to include a provision restricting gender-affirming care in the military, approved by a vote of the Republican members of the Committee with the support of conservative Democratic Senator Joe Manchin. [10] This provision was not mentioned in the summary of the text the Committee had released earlier, and the presence of gender-affirming care restrictions in both the House and Senate texts was seen as increasing the odds such a provision would be included in the bill as finally passed. [10]
In July 2024, a coalition of industry groups authored a joint letter to members of both the House Armed Services Committee and Senate Armed Services Committee opposing Section 828 of the Senate version of the Act (S. 4638), entitled "Requirement for Contractors to Provide Reasonable Access to Repair Materials," which would require contractors doing business with the US military to agree "to provide the Department of Defense fair and reasonable access to all the repair materials, including parts, tools, and information, used by the manufacturer or provider or their authorized partners to diagnose, maintain, or repair the good or service." [11] The signatories to the letter included the Aerospace Industries Association, Associated Equipment Distributors, Association of Equipment Manufacturers, Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, Illinois Manufacturers' Association, International Safety Equipment Association, Irrigation Association, Metals Service Center Institute, Motorcycle Industry Council, National Association of Manufacturers, National Defense Industrial Association, National Mining Association, National Shooting Sports Foundation, Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association, Plumbing Manufacturers International, Security Industry Association, and Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce. [11]
The Senate's version of the 2025 NDAA includes a clause to posthumously advance Air Force General John D. Lavelle's retired rank from major general to lieutenant general, while the House's version would fully restore his four-star general rank on the retire-list. The reconciled bill includes the clause corresponding to the Senate's version.[ citation needed ]
The 2025 NDAA extended the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act to 2030. It also prevents the U.S. military from sourcing products prohibited by the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act anywhere in the world. [12]
In November 2024, it was reported that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D ‑ NY) wanted to attach the controversial Antisemitism Awareness Act , which the House had passed earlier in the year, to the 2025 NDAA. [13] However, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R ‑ LA) announced that House Republicans would reject the linkage of the two Acts, arguing that it was a scheme for Democratic Senators to avoid having to go on the record as voting for or against it. [14]
The Senate version of the NDAA contains a provision expanding selective service registration to women; the House version does not. On December 5, a group of eight GOP senators, led by Missouri's Josh Hawley, sent a letter to the chairs of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees, opposing the inclusion of the provision in the final version of the Bill being negotiated between the House and Senate. [15]
The version of the bill that was negotiated and agreed to by the House and Senate removed provisions that restricted abortion access, DEI programs and gender-affirming care for active-duty service members. [16] [17] However, afterwards, House Speaker Mike Johnson added a provision that would ban TRICARE from covering gender-affirming care for minors which was not in the negotiated version agreed to by the House and Senate. [16] The provision threatened the traditionally bipartisan support of the bill as many democrats said they could not support the bill due to the provision. [18] Over 300 LGBT and human rights organizations including the Human Rights Campaign, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Lambda Legal, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, the National Center for Lesbian Rights, Planned Parenthood, Reproductive Freedom for All and The Trevor Project voiced opposition to the bill over the provision and urged Congress to vote against it. [19]
The bill passed the House on December 11, 2024 by a vote of 281-140. [20] Many House Democrats who voted in favor of the bill voiced opposition to the provision, but decided to support the bill for other reasons such as increased pay for service members and financing new military technology. [21] On December 13, 2024, over 40 Senate Democrats signed a letter addressed to the Senate Appropriations Committee leaders urging them to reject new anti-abortion and anti-LGBTQ+ riders in future appropriations bills. [22]
On December 16, 2024, Senator Tammy Baldwin and over 20 other Democratic Senators introduced an amendment to the Senate version of bill removing the restriction on TRICARE coverage for gender-affirming care for minors, however the amendment was never brought up for a vote. [23] [24] [25] On December 18, 2024, the bill passed the Senate by a vote of 85-14 with the provision included. Like the House Democrats who voted in favor of the bill, Senate Democrats who voted in favor of the bill opposed the restrictions on gender-affirming care, but voted in favor of the bill for other things in the bill that they supported. [26]
LGBTQ Nation said that, due to the vague language of the provision, which bans TRICARE coverage of gender dysphoria "treatments that could result in sterilization" for minors, but does not name any specific treatments, it is unclear if the provision will actually be able to ban TRICARE coverage of gender-affirming care for minors since puberty-blocking drugs do not affect fertility. [27] Additionally, medical experts said that gender-affirming treatments do not typically cause sterilization, but LGBTQ+ advocates noted that Republicans intend for the provision to ban coverage for all gender-affirming treatments for minors under TRICARE regardless and worry that the incoming Donald Trump administration will enforce it this way. [25] The provision is estimated to affect between 6,000 and 7,000 military families. [16] However, a 2022 study found that approximately 2,500 children were treated with gender-affirming care through TRICARE in 2017. [28] The provision was opposed by military veterans, families and active-duty service members who have transgender connections. [29] Some military families with transgender kids said that if passed, they would either be forced to leave the military, seek a different insurance provider or pay out of pocket for their child's treatment. [30] [31]
The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) is legislation proposed in the United States Congress that would prohibit discrimination in hiring and employment on the basis of sexual orientation or, depending on the version of the bill, gender identity, by employers with at least 15 employees.
The rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the United States are among the most advanced in the world, with public opinion and jurisprudence changing significantly since the late 1980s.
The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act is a landmark United States federal law, passed on October 22, 2009, and signed into law by President Barack Obama on October 28, 2009, as a rider to the National Defense Authorization Act for 2010. Conceived as a response to the murders of Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr., both in 1998, the measure expands the 1969 United States federal hate-crime law to include crimes motivated by a victim's actual or perceived gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) individuals in the U.S. state of Alabama have federal protections, but still face legal challenges and discrimination on the state level that is not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. LGBTQ rights in Alabama—a Republican Party stronghold located in both the Deep South and greater Bible Belt—are severely limited in comparison to other states. As one of the most socially conservative states in the U.S., Alabama is one of the only two states along with neighboring Mississippi where opposition to same-sex marriage outnumbers support. Same-sex sexual activity in Alabama was legalized in accordance with the 2003 Lawrence v. Texas decision. The state's anti-sodomy provisions were repealed in 2019; making it the only state in the Deep South to codify same-sex sexual activity into state law.
Vicky Jo Hartzler is an American politician, and businesswoman who served as the U.S. representative for Missouri's 4th congressional district from 2011 to 2023. A member of the Republican Party, she served as the Missouri state representative for the 124th district from 1995 to 2001.
Kristina D. Roegner is an American politician who serves as a member of the Ohio Senate. She has represented the 27th senatorial district since 2019. Her district encompasses the majority of Summit County in Northern Ohio.
The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2012 is a United States federal law which, among other things, specified the budget and expenditures of the United States Department of Defense. The bill passed the U.S. House on December 14, 2011 and passed the U.S. Senate on December 15, 2011. It was signed into law on December 31, 2011 by President Barack Obama.
The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2013 is a United States federal law which specifies the budget and expenditures of the United States Department of Defense for fiscal year 2013. The full title is An Act to Authorize Appropriations for fiscal year 2013 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes. This law has been assigned the number PL 112–239.
The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2014 is a bill that was introduced into the United States House of Representatives on September 10, 2013. The original text of the bill was for a continuing resolution that would make continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2014 United States federal budget. Though versions of the bill passed each house of Congress, the House and Senate were not able to reconcile the bills and pass a compromise measure.
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 is a United States federal law which specifies the budget and expenditures of the United States Department of Defense (DOD) for Fiscal Year 2014. The law authorizes the DOD to spend $607 billion in Fiscal Year 2014.
The Carl Levin and Howard P. "Buck" McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 was a National Defense Authorization Act. According to the House Armed Services Committee, which oversaw the legislation, the bill would be "the comprehensive legislation to authorize the budget authority of the Department of Defense and the national security programs of the Department of Energy." The total appropriations that are authorized amount to approximately $600 billion for fiscal year 2015.
Transgender people have served or sought to serve in the United States military throughout its history. Since January 25, 2021, transgender individuals have been allowed to openly serve and enlist in the U.S. military; however President-elect Donald Trump announced plans to reinstate a ban on transgender individuals serving and enlisting in the U.S. military, which he plans to enact on January 20, 2025.
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 is a United States federal law which specifies the budget, expenditures and policies of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) for Fiscal Year 2018. Analogous NDAAs have been passed in previous and subsequent years.
The SAFE Banking Act, officially H.R. 1595, full title Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Act, also referred to as the SAFE Banking Act of 2019, and as of 2023 the Secure and Fair Enforcement Regulation (SAFER) Banking Act, is proposed legislation regarding disposition of funds gained through the cannabis industry in the United States.
The William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 is a United States federal law which specifies the budget, expenditures and policies of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) for fiscal year 2021. Analogous NDAAs have been passed annually for 59 years. The act is named in honor of Representative Mac Thornberry, who served as either the chair or the ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee. Thornberry retired from Congress at the end of the congressional session.
The Commission on the Naming of Items of the Department of Defense that Commemorate the Confederate States of America or Any Person Who Served Voluntarily with the Confederate States of America, more commonly referred to as the Naming Commission, was a United States government commission created by the United States Congress in 2021 to create a list of military assets with names associated with the Confederate States of America and recommendations for their removal.
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 is a United States federal law which specifies the budget, expenditures and policies of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) for fiscal year 2022. Analogous NDAAs have been passed annually for 60 years.
John Scott Duarte is an American politician, businessman, and farmer. A member of the Republican Party, he has served as the U.S. representative for California's 13th congressional district since 2023.
The James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 is a United States federal law which specifies the budget, expenditures and policies of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) for fiscal year 2023. Analogous NDAAs have been passed annually for over 60 years.
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 is a United States federal law which specifies the budget, expenditures, and policies of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) for fiscal year 2024.