Old Bess (beam engine)

Last updated

Old Bess
Old bess beam engine may 2015.JPG
Old Bess, as now preserved in the Science Museum, London
Origins
Type Watt beam engine
Designer James Watt
Maker Boulton and Watt
Date1777 (1777)
Country of origin England
Former operator Soho Manufactory
Purpose Water-returning engine driving factory machinery
Measurements
Cylinders1
Bore33 inches (838 mm)
Preservation
Collection Science Museum Group
Location Science Museum, London
WorkingNo

Old Bess is an early beam engine built by the partnership of Boulton and Watt. The engine was constructed in 1777 and worked until 1848. [1]

Contents

The engine is most obviously known simply for being an early example of an engine built by Boulton and Watt. However it also played a far more important role in the development of steam engines for being the first engine designed to work with an early cutoff, and so to use the expansion of the steam for greater efficiency.

It is now preserved in the Power Gallery of the Science Museum, London. [2] [3] [4] It is the oldest surviving Watt engine, and the third-oldest surviving beam engine. [lower-roman 1]

Watt's previous Kinneil Engine

Watt's first engine at Kinneil in Scotland [5] [6] had been unsuccessful, [7] and the parts were taken down and re-used at Boulton's Soho Manufactory in Birmingham. [1] The reworked engine was more successful there, and encouraged Boulton to invest further in this developing steam technology and in Watt's inventions.

The Manufactory had been built to use a water wheel to drive its machinery, and the site had been chosen on that basis, but there were concerns over seasonal lack of water to power the wheel. [8] Similar problems in the iron industry had inspired the development of the water-returning engine: a steam pump that could raise water to drive the wheel, in times of low water on the river. The Kinneil Engine had been built as a pump, for use in a coal mine, and so was suitable for this new task. Watt's rotative beam engine had not yet been considered and so the only way to produce rotary work to drive machinery in the Manufactory was by water power.

In 1777 Boulton and Watt decided to build a second engine for use at Soho, either to supplement the Kinneil Engine [8] or primarily to experiment with Watt's new idea of expansive working of the steam. [1] The new engine was also to be a water-returning engine [2] Like the earlier Newcomen engines, it was only capable of pumping water rather than driving machinery directly.

Working life

Construction

As early as 1769, Watt was considering the possibility of working steam expansively, as recorded in a letter of 28 May to Dr. Small. [9] Early engines were incapable of this, as they used a single valve for both inlet and exhaust. As Watt had already begun to use separate valves for each function, [1] it would now be possible to control their timing independently, i.e. to apply lead to the timing of the inlet valve. Watt decided to construct a new engine to demonstrate this principle and was confident of the substantial savings in coal consumption to be offered. [10]

Construction began in 1777 with the ordering of a 33-inch [lower-roman 2] cylinder (84 cm). [1] The engine was erected and working at Soho by August, although still incomplete.

The engine always worked as a water pump and was equipped with two cast iron cylinders at opposite ends of the beam, one for the working cylinder and one for the pump. The pump cylinder was taller and thinner, of 24 inches (61 cm) diameter and 8 feet 3 inches (2.5 m) tall, designed for a working stroke 7 feet (2.1 m) within this, although only 6 feet 1 inch (1.9 m) was used in practice. The pumped water was delivered at a head of 24 feet (7.3 m). [1] The engine was later described as being of 30  hp in power. [11]

The beam was typical for early single-acting beam engines, pulling through wrought iron chains running over a curved arch-head at each end of the beam. At some later point, possibly when reconstructed after the fire, this beam was strengthened by being strutted and bridled with the additional timber and iron triangular trusses that are seen above the beam today. [7]

Beelzebub

Initial operation of the engine was unsatisfactory. Watt was away in Cornwall and Boulton wrote to him, describing the engine's actions as "very fierce". [12] His opinion was that the engine's cylinder was too large for the work expected of it. This led to it being worked at a pressure of around 5.7 psi, whereas if it were operating at 8 psi, it would be less jerky and violent. This action was so remarkable as to give the engine its initial nickname of Beelzebub . [1]

Neither Watt nor Boulton had a solution to the engine's behaviour. Watt's experience with the Chacewater engine, a rebuilt Smeaton engine, at Wheal Busy, suggested that cutoff led to a violent action. In September he recommended throttling the steam supply to the engine. [13] Boulton favoured further experimentation with cutoff (i.e. valve timing) and in 1779 suggested that a series of more scientific measurements be tried. With hindsight, Boulton's approach was the more thermodynamically efficient, although this lesson was not fully appreciated by locomotive drivers right to the end of steam power.

Fire and reconstruction

One morning in July 1778 the engine house was discovered to be on fire. The fire spread rapidly and within half an hour the roof was burned to the ground. The timberwork and soldered copper piping of the engine were also destroyed or damaged. Even the beam itself, a substantial timber construction, was "rendered unfit" by the fire. Fortunately the most important part of the engine, its cylinder, survived the fire relatively intact. Within three weeks the engine had been reconstructed and was expected to be working again shortly. [1]

While the engine had been damaged, Watt, who was once again away in Cornwall, had advised that "no repair farther that the roof ought to be gone about at present", with his intention being to reconstruct the engine in some improved manner. [1] The nature of these reconstructions, and their effectiveness, remains unclear.

By 1781, the engine had been working in its reconstructed form for some years. Whatever the improvements had been, they left Watt and Boulton still agreeing that this was, "one of the worst engines they had". [1] [14]

Closure of the Mint and preservation

The engine operated at the Soho Mint in Handsworth, West Midlands, until the mint's closure in 1848. It was sold for £48, then re-sold for £58 and placed on display on an island in Derrington Pool, outside the metal-rolling works of its new owner, a Mr. Walker. [1] Although much of the Mint's coining machinery had been re-sold for further use at the new Birmingham Mint, this aged and thoroughly obsolete engine appears to have been one of the first artefacts of industrial archaeology to be deliberately preserved.

The engine was later re-sold and then presented to the Commissioners of Patents for their Patent Office Museum, which would in turn become the Science Museum in London. [1] The engine is thus not only one of the museum's oldest exhibits, but also one of the first to enter its collection. When first displayed, the engine was erected in an open-fronted representation of a brick-built engine house. [15] It is now displayed on free-standing timberwork, allowing a closer inspection of the cylinders.

For an engine that had been described as "one of the worst engines they had" when almost new, it had a relatively long working life of over 70 years. Its name had also shifted from the violent Beelzebub to the rather more friendly Old Bess, indicating a more satisfactory performance. [16] Reports by both Joseph Harrison, Artificer of the Soho Mint [11] and William Buckle support this. [1]

In 2009 it was awarded an Engineering Heritage Award by the IMechE. [17]

Confusion between engines

Several confusions exist about this engine, and have been widely repeated.

The first of these confusions is that this was Watt's second engine (after the Kinneil engine) and the first by the Boulton and Watt partnership. [7] In fact several engines were built between 1773 (the return of the Kinneil engine to Birmingham) and the construction of Beelzebub in 1777. [18] These include such well-known engines as the 1775 38-inch blowing engine for John Wilkinson's blast furnaces at New Willey, near Broseley in Shropshire, and the 50-inch pumping engine for Bloomfield Colliery near Tipton in the West Midlands. [8] [18]

The identity of Beelzebub is also confused. Some sources describe this as referring to the rebuilt Kinneil engine at Birmingham. [7] There are two pieces of evidence to support the view that Old Bess and Beelzebub are the same engine. [8] Firstly the name Beelzebub derives from its violent action when used experimentally for expansive working, an experiment applied to the engine built new in 1777. [1] Secondly Beelzebub is described as a 33-inch engine, as is Old Bess on display today. There is no record of Boulton & Watt ever building another engine of this dimension. [1]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Watt</span> Scottish inventor, mechanical engineer and chemist (1736–1819)

James Watt was a Scottish inventor, mechanical engineer, and chemist who improved on Thomas Newcomen's 1712 Newcomen steam engine with his Watt steam engine in 1776, which was fundamental to the changes brought by the Industrial Revolution in both his native Great Britain and the rest of the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Newcomen</span> English inventor, ironmonger and Baptist lay preacher (1664-1729)

Thomas Newcomen was an English inventor who created the atmospheric engine, the first practical fuel-burning engine in 1712. He was an ironmonger by trade and a Baptist lay preacher by calling.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Newcomen atmospheric engine</span> Early engine invented by Thomas Newcomen.

The atmospheric engine was invented by Thomas Newcomen in 1712, and is often referred to as the Newcomen fire engine or simply as a Newcomen engine. The engine was operated by condensing steam drawn into the cylinder, thereby creating a partial vacuum which allowed the atmospheric pressure to push the piston into the cylinder. It was historically significant as the first practical device to harness steam to produce mechanical work. Newcomen engines were used throughout Britain and Europe, principally to pump water out of mines. Hundreds were constructed throughout the 18th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Watt steam engine</span> Industrial Revolution era stream engine design

The Watt steam engine design became synonymous with steam engines, and it was many years before significantly new designs began to replace the basic Watt design.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boulton and Watt</span> British engineering firm, 1775–1895

Boulton & Watt was an early British engineering and manufacturing firm in the business of designing and making marine and stationary steam engines. Founded in the English West Midlands around Birmingham in 1775 as a partnership between the English manufacturer Matthew Boulton and the Scottish engineer James Watt, the firm had a major role in the Industrial Revolution and grew to be a major producer of steam engines in the 19th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smethwick Engine</span>

The Smethwick Engine is a Watt steam engine made by Boulton and Watt, which was installed near Birmingham, England, and was brought into service in May 1779. Now at Thinktank, Birmingham Science Museum, it is the oldest working steam engine and the oldest working engine in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Soho Manufactory</span> Early factory

The Soho Manufactory was an early factory which pioneered mass production on the assembly line principle, in Soho, Birmingham, England, at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. It operated from 1766–1848 and was demolished in 1853.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stationary steam engine</span> Fixed steam engine for pumping or power generation

Stationary steam engines are fixed steam engines used for pumping or driving mills and factories, and for power generation. They are distinct from locomotive engines used on railways, traction engines for heavy steam haulage on roads, steam cars, agricultural engines used for ploughing or threshing, marine engines, and the steam turbines used as the mechanism of power generation for most nuclear power plants.

Steam power developed slowly over a period of several hundred years, progressing through expensive and fairly limited devices in the early 17th century, to useful pumps for mining in 1700, and then to Watt's improved steam engine designs in the late 18th century. It is these later designs, introduced just when the need for practical power was growing due to the Industrial Revolution, that truly made steam power commonplace.

Improvements to the steam engine were some of the most important technologies of the Industrial Revolution, although steam did not replace water power in importance in Britain until after the Industrial Revolution. From Englishman Thomas Newcomen's atmospheric engine, of 1712, through major developments by Scottish inventor and mechanical engineer James Watt, the steam engine began to be used in many industrial settings, not just in mining, where the first engines had been used to pump water from deep workings. Early mills had run successfully with water power, but by using a steam engine a factory could be located anywhere, not just close to a water source. Water power varied with the seasons and was not always available.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beam engine</span> Early configuration of the steam engine utilising a rocking beam to connect major components.

A beam engine is a type of steam engine where a pivoted overhead beam is used to apply the force from a vertical piston to a vertical connecting rod. This configuration, with the engine directly driving a pump, was first used by Thomas Newcomen around 1705 to remove water from mines in Cornwall. The efficiency of the engines was improved by engineers including James Watt, who added a separate condenser; Jonathan Hornblower and Arthur Woolf, who compounded the cylinders; and William McNaught, who devised a method of compounding an existing engine. Beam engines were first used to pump water out of mines or into canals but could be used to pump water to supplement the flow for a waterwheel powering a mill.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cornish engine</span> Type of steam beam engine originating in Cornwall

A Cornish engine is a type of steam engine developed in Cornwall, England, mainly for pumping water from a mine. It is a form of beam engine that uses steam at a higher pressure than the earlier engines designed by James Watt. The engines were also used for powering man engines to assist the underground miners' journeys to and from their working levels, for winching materials into and out of the mine, and for powering on-site ore stamping machinery.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Soho Mint</span>

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the steam engine</span> Heat engine that performs mechanical work using steam as its working fluid

The first recorded rudimentary steam engine was the aeolipile mentioned by Vitruvius between 30 and 15 BC and, described by Heron of Alexandria in 1st-century Roman Egypt. Several steam-powered devices were later experimented with or proposed, such as Taqi al-Din's steam jack, a steam turbine in 16th-century Ottoman Egypt, and Thomas Savery's steam pump in 17th-century England. In 1712, Thomas Newcomen's atmospheric engine became the first commercially successful engine using the principle of the piston and cylinder, which was the fundamental type of steam engine used until the early 20th century. The steam engine was used to pump water out of coal mines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Whitbread Engine</span>

The Whitbread Engine preserved in the Powerhouse Museum in Sydney, Australia, built in 1785, is one of the first rotative steam engines ever built, and is the oldest surviving. A rotative engine is a type of beam engine where the reciprocating motion of the beam is converted to rotary motion, producing a continuous power source suitable for driving machinery.

A water-returning engine was an early form of stationary steam engine, developed at the start of the Industrial Revolution in the middle of the 18th century. The first beam engines did not generate power by rotating a shaft but were developed as water pumps, mostly for draining mines. By coupling this pump with a water wheel, they could be used to drive machinery.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cataract (beam engine)</span>

A cataract was a speed governing device used for early single-acting beam engines, particularly atmospheric engines and Cornish engines. It was a kind of water clock.

Resolution was an early beam engine, installed between 1781 and 1782 at Coalbrookdale as a water-returning engine to power the blast furnaces and ironworks there. It was one of the last water-returning engines to be constructed, before the rotative beam engine made this type of engine obsolete.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Newcomen Memorial Engine</span> Preserved beam engine in Devon, England

The Newcomen Memorial Engine is a preserved beam engine in Dartmouth, Devon. It was preserved as a memorial to Thomas Newcomen, inventor of the beam engine, who was born in Dartmouth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lap Engine</span>

The Lap Engine is a beam engine designed by James Watt, built by Boulton and Watt in 1788. It is now preserved at the Science Museum, London.

References

  1. Two older Newcomen engines survive, the Newcomen Memorial Engine at Dartmouth and Fairbottom Bobs in the Henry Ford Museum.
  2. Engines were characterised by and often named after the diameter of their cylinder. This dimension (amongst other factors) determined their power output; whilst the working pressure and precise piston stroke length could be altered, the cylinder was fixed at manufacture.
  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Dickinson, H.W.; Jenkins, R. (1981) [1927]. James Watt and the Steam Engine. Moorland Publishing. pp. 120–126. ISBN   0-903485-92-3.
  2. 1 2 "'Old Bess' engine by Boulton & Watt, 1777". Science Museum.
  3. "'Old Bess' – general arrangement drawing". Science Museum. 1861.
  4. Mark Meynell (22 March 2011). ""Old Bess" Science Museum – James Watt Exhibition". Flickr.
  5. "James Watt's Cottage". Gazetteer for Scotland . Retrieved 26 April 2014. immediately to the southwest of Kinneil House ... James Watt (1736–1819) devised his improved steam engine in 1765.
  6. "Kinneil House". Historic Scotland . Retrieved 26 April 2014. The grounds contain the ruins of James Watt's cottage
  7. 1 2 3 4 Crowley, T.E. (1982). The Beam Engine. Senecio Publishing. pp. 44–45. ISBN   0-906831-02-4.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Wilson, P.N. (1963). "Water-Driven Prime Movers". Engineering Heritage. Vol. I. Institution of Mechanical Engineers. pp. 58–59.
  9. Arago, M. (1838). Historical Eloge of James Watt. London. p. 88. admit steam until one-fourth of the distance between it and the next valve is filled with steam, shut the valve and the steam will continue to expand and to press round the wheel with diminishing power
  10. Letter to Gilbert Meason, 24 April 1777, Boulton & Watt colln.
  11. 1 2 Joseph Harrison, Science Museum collection
  12. Letter to Watt, 18 August 1777, Boulton & Watt colln.
  13. Letter to Boulton, 20 September 1777, Boulton & Watt colln.
  14. Letter from Watt to Boulton, 1781, Boulton & Watt colln.
  15. Crowley, Terence Eldon (1 January 1986). Beam Engines. Princes Risborough: Shire Publications. pp. 9, 12. ISBN   978-0-85263-802-6.
  16. Storer, J.D. (1969). A Simple History of the Steam Engine. London: John Baker. p. 58. ISBN   0-212-98356-3.
  17. "Engineering Heritage Award". IMechE. p. 12.
  18. 1 2 Dickinson & Jenkins 1927, Chap. IX, The Single Acting Pumping Engine, pp. 111–119