People of the Philippines v. Santos, Ressa and Rappler

Last updated

People of the Philippines v. Santos, Ressa and Rappler
Regional Trial Court.svg
Court Manila   Regional Trial Court
Branch46
Full case name
People of the Philippines v. Reynaldo Santos, Jr., Maria Angelita Ressa and Rappler, Inc.
DecidedJune 15, 2020 (2020-06-15)
CitationR-MNL-19-01141-CR
Case history
Prior action(s)NBI and Keng v. Santos et al. (XVI-INV-18C-00049) [1]
Related action(s)
Alleged ownership irregularities:
  • Securities and Exchange Commission: In re: Rappler Inc. and Rappler Holdings Corporation (SP Case No. 08-17-001)
  • Court of Appeals: Rappler Inc. v. SEC (CA-G.R. SP No. 154292)
  • Pasig City RTC Branch 265: People of the Philippines v. Maria Ressa (R-PSG-19-00737-CR)

Alleged defamation:

Alleged tax evasion:

  • Pasig City RTC Branch 165: People of the Philippines v. Rappler Holdings Corp. (R-PSG-18-02983-CR)
  • Court of Tax Appeals: People of the Philippines v. Rappler Holdings Corp. and Maria Ressa (Crim. Case No. O-679)
Ruling
Ponente Rainelda Estacio-Montesa
Maria Ressa was found guilty of cyberlibel, and the Court found that a guilty verdict in her case would not unduly harm the right to free expression in the Philippines.
Laws applied
Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012
Wikisource-logo.svg Constitution of the Philippines (1987).—Article III Section 4

People of the Philippines v. Santos, Ressa and Rappler (R-MNL-19-01141-CR), also known as the Maria Ressa cyberlibel case, is a high-profile criminal case in the Philippines, lodged against Maria Ressa, co-owner and CEO of Rappler Inc.. [2] Accused of cyberlibel, Ressa was found guilty by a Manila Regional Trial Court on June 15, 2020. [3] [4] : 36 

Contents

The case centered on an article published on Rappler by Reynaldo Santos Jr. which accused the former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines of accepting favors from Filipino-Chinese businessman Wilfredo Keng. [5] Santos, Ressa, and others were charged with cyberlibel retrospectively, as the article was originally published four months before the Cybercrime Prevention Act came into effect. [6] [7] Rappler Inc., as a corporation, was not found liable; Santos, however, as author, was. Ressa, in her capacity of Rappler's chief executive officer, was also found liable. [8] By the time Santos was charged, he was no longer working as a journalist for Rappler. [9]

The court ruled that Ressa "did not offer a scintilla of proof that they verified the imputations of various crimes in the disputed article ... [Rappler] just simply published them as news in their online publication in reckless disregard of whether they are false or not." [4] : 34  The judgement also argued that Ressa had deliberately called herself an executive editor, rather than the editor-in-chief, in an attempt to avoid liability. [4] : 25  Ressa, along with Santos Jr., appealed to the Court of Appeals after the conviction. [8] However, the court upheld the decision, noting that the article is "defamatory or libelous per se"; [10] a motion for reconsideration was denied by the appellate court, prompting Ressa to elevate the case to the Supreme Court for a judicial review.

The ruling was criticized by several human rights groups and international organizations, [11] [12] [13] [14] with the United Nations High Commissioner of Human Rights describing the case as part of a "pattern of intimidation" against the Philippine press. [3]

Background

Maria Ressa was one of those found guilty of cyberlibel as a result of People v. Santos, et al. Maria Ressa.jpg
Maria Ressa was one of those found guilty of cyberlibel as a result of People v. Santos, et al.

The Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (R.A. 10175) was signed into law by President Benigno Aquino III on September 12, 2012, becoming effective on October 3. [6] Among the actions criminalized by this law is "cyberlibel". [6] Six days after the law commenced, the Supreme Court issued a temporary restraining order to stop its implementation. [15] [16] On February 18, 2014, the Court declared that the law is constitutional, upholding most of its provisions including cyberlibel. [17]

Rappler is a Filipino news website that was co-founded in 2012 by journalist Maria Ressa. She served as the site's CEO and executive editor since its founding. On May 29, 2012, Rappler researcher and writer Reynaldo Santos Jr. published an article titled "CJ using SUVs of 'controversial' businessmen". [5] Among those named in the article is businessman Wilfredo Keng. The article details Keng's involvement in a controversy surrounding Chief Justice Renato Corona, who was later impeached. As of December 2023, the article remains online. [5]

Santos Jr.'s article primarily relied on a 2002 Philippine Star article as a source, [18] [19] as well as on an "intelligence report" prepared that same year by the National Security Council, which the article says implicated Keng in human trafficking and drug smuggling. [5] [20] This report, however, was not presented to the Court as evidence. [4] On February 16, 2019, Philippine Star took down the aforementioned article after Keng threatened legal action. [21]

On December 20, 2017, Keng filed a complaint-affidavit before the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) to charge Santos, Jr. and Ressa, along with Rappler's treasurer James Bitanga and six others, with cyberlibel. [22] [23] The NBI's Cybercrime Department argued that because of a legal gray area regarding the theory of "continuous publication", [note 1] it can be assumed that Keng saw the article in question after the passing of the law. [7] However, the NBI ultimately decided not to charge Rappler. [22] The Department of Justice (DOJ) later took up the case and recommended the charges be filed. The DOJ reasoned that on February 19, 2014, the article was changed to correct a misspelling of the word "evasion", [note 2] [24] which can be considered as re-publication according to the department. [2]

Another issue that the DOJ opined on was the prescriptive period. In Philippine law, a regular libel has a prescriptive period of one year, but the cybercrime law does not define such period for cyberlibel. Therefore, the DOJ reasoned that it must be twelve years, according to an American-era law that is still in effect today. [2] [25] [26] While there was a temporary restraining order against implementation of the cybercrime law, the 2014 ruling by the Supreme Court made the law go into effect as scheduled on October 3, 2012. [27] [1] [20] The DOJ later dropped Bitanga and six others from the complaint, as their "part in the publication [had not been] established". [28]

Ressa was arrested on the night of February 13, 2019; she spent the night in jail before being released on bail the next morning. She alleged that she was purposely arrested at night so that she could not bail herself out in a timely manner. [29] As of March 2019, she has paid more than ₱ 2 million in bail and travel bonds, the latter of which Ressa's camp labeled as "excessive". [30] She could potentially serve around 100 years in prison if she was to be found guilty on all cases. [31]

Aside from People v. Santos, et al., Rappler also faced a number of lawsuits filed by various government agencies, including on the irregularities on its ownership as well as allegations of tax evasion. [32] [33] Ressa on multiple occasions had connected President Rodrigo Duterte to the legal cases filed the executive branch against Rappler. [34] [35]

Trial

Ressa and Santos Jr. were arraigned on May 13, 2019. [36] [ better source needed ] Their trial began on July 23, 2019. [37] They were represented by lawyers Theodore Te [36] and J.J. Disini of the FLAG. [38]

In the lead-up to the trial, the defendants' lawyers tried several times to achieve dismissal via motions to quash in February 2019, [39] motions to dismiss in April 2019, [39] and demurrers in November 2019. [40] All such motions were denied by the Court. [41]

The verdict was originally scheduled for April 3, 2020, but it was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. [42] On the advice of counsel, neither Ressa nor Santos Jr. testified in their own defense. [43] [44]

Verdict

After a trial that lasted for eight months, [45] Ressa and Santos Jr. were both found guilty of cyberlibel by Judge Rainelda Estacio-Montesa of the Manila Regional Trial Court Branch 46. [3] [4] : 36  The verdict was handed down on June 15, 2020. [3] [4] : 36  Although corporate liability against Rappler Inc. had been sought, the judge ruled that there was no corporate liability in this case. [4] : 28–29  [8] They were both sentenced to between six months and six years in prison, [4] : 36  but are entitled to bail while they have appeals pending in higher courts. [8] They were also both assessed fines of ₱400,000 for combined "moral damages" and "exemplary damages". [4] : 36 

In its ruling, the Court said that Ressa "did not offer a scintilla of proof that they verified the imputations of various crimes in the disputed article. [...] They just simply published them as news in their online publication in reckless disregard of whether they are false or not"; [4] : 34  it also said that Ressa committed a "clever ruse" by not calling herself an editor-in-chief, but rather an executive editor, to avoid libel liability; [4] : 25  this was criticized by several media outlets, as the position is common. [46] [47]

The Court also drew an adverse inference from Ressa and Santos Jr.'s refusal to testify, relying on People v. Resano (G.R. No. L-57738) as precedent, which states that defendants "owe it to themselves" to testify if they are "in the best position to refute [the] charges" as there may be no other way to affect "the complete destruction of the prosecution's prima facie case". [4] : 27  [48]

The ruling was handed down in person, despite the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and general community quarantine. [49] Judge Estacio-Montesa ordered her clerk to first read out her fallo , which read in part, "there is no curtailment of the right to freedom of speech and of the press", before the Court's ruling. [50] [51]

Appeal

Ressa appealed the guilty verdict both on her own behalf and of Santos Jr., [3] [8] who Rappler Inc. is covering the legal costs of. [9] When the Court of Appeals upheld the verdict, she filed a motion for reconsideration arguing that the appellate court "erred in holding that the offense of cyberlibel against appellants has not prescribed and that the period of prescription should be 15 years and not one year," considering that the Revised Penal Code already provides a one-year prescriptive period for "libel and other offenses". [52] In an October 2022 decision, the court denied the motion due to a lack of merit, affirming the conviction and increasing the potential prison sentence accompanying it. Ressa has appealed by certiorari to the Supreme Court. [53]

"Amicus curiae"-Intervention

The Supreme Court of the Philippines First Division's resolution dated January 24, 2024, granted Irene Khan's Motion for Leave to Intervene, to sit as an "amicus curiae" or chosen Expert and it also admitted and noted her amicus brief submitted through Atty. Rodel Taton. "The law in the country fails to adequately protect the right to freedom of expression, citing Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which the Philippines is a member. The country's Ant-Cybercrime Law raises serious concerns that it limits the ability of journalists to expose, document and address issues of important public interest, thereby violating the right to receive and impart information," Khan's brief alleged. The International Bar Association's Human Rights Institute was also permitted to submit its legal opinion “by way of special appearance” through Atty. Maria Cristina Yambot, in Ressa and Reynaldo Santos' case. [54] [55]

People of the Philippines v. Ressa

After the verdict, Keng sued Ressa again for cyberlibel, this time over a tweet she wrote on February 15, 2019, which contained a screenshot of the 2002 Philippine Star article discussed in the 2012 Rappler article. [56] [57] Keng stated that by republishing the article, "[Ressa] feloniously communicated the malicious imputations against me not only to her 350,000 Twitter followers, but to anyone who has access to the internet." [58]

This second case, directed only against Ressa, was filed on November 23, 2020 at Makati RTC Branch 147. [59] The case was withdrawn by Keng on June 1, 2021, to "dedicate time and resources to support ongoing efforts to battle the pandemic". [60] [61] Although Keng did not request a criminal dismissal, judge Andres Soriano still dismissed the case, reasoning that "the public prosecutor manifested that with the private complainant turning hostile to the cause of the prosecution, the prosecution can no longer prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt." [60]

This case does not affect the original guilty verdict under appeal. [62] [60]

Reactions

Reaction to the case was mixed. Before the verdict in April 2020, the annual Press Freedom Index report by Reporters Without Borders ranked the Philippines 136 out of 180 countries in terms of press freedom. [63] Historically, since the end of martial law under Ferdinand Marcos, the Philippines was regarded as having one of the most free presses in Asia. [64] [65] [66] [67] People v. Santos, et al. is one of multiple legal cases filed by various government agencies against Rappler. Collectively, these have been described by The Guardian and Reporters Without Borders as "judicial harassment". [68] [63]

Vice President Leni Robredo, the leader of the opposition, argued that the verdict was intended as an instruction to the opposition to "keep quiet". [69] Hillary Clinton echoed a similar sentiment; while Madeleine Albright said she "stands with Maria Ressa". [70] The National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP) declared that the verdict "basically kills freedom of speech and of the press" and has led to a "dark day ... for all Filipinos." [71] J.J. Disini, who represented Ressa and Santos during the trial, criticized the verdict. [72]

The United Nations High Commissioner of Human Rights suggested that the case was part of a "pattern of intimidation" against the Philippine press, [3] while Amnesty International called on the judiciary to "quash" the cases, [12] as did Human Rights Watch. [13] A group of United States senators called the verdict a "travesty of justice" that "set dangerous precedents". [73] The European External Action Service commented that the verdict "raises serious doubts over the respect for freedom of expression as well as for the rule of law in the Philippines." [74] This sentiment was echoed by United Nations special rapporteur David Kaye. [75] The United States Department of State's response expressed "concern" over the verdict, [75] [76] to which the Malacañang reacted negatively, warning of another possible "setback" in diplomatic relations if the State Department continued to interfere. [75]

Spokesperson Harry Roque suggested the law was passed under the previous administration. [71] Roque had previously been a petitioner in Disini v. Sec'y of Justice which attempted to have cyberlibel removed as an offence. [77] Roque also emphasized that the prosecution of Rappler is not politically motivated, [78] and has urged people to respect the ruling. He has also argued that in 2008, Duterte, the mayor of Davao at that time, had helped a journalist jailed on a libel charge, and that Duterte does not prosecute journalists who make accusations against him. [79] [80] Roque also stated that Duterte's appointment of Keng's daughter as a member of the Philippine Commission on Women on September 19, 2019, did not affect the integrity of the verdict against Ressa. [81] [82]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ The theory is based on the idea that, as long as the article is online, the server (in this case, Rappler) was "publishing" it again whenever it was accessed by someone, akin to print-on-demand for printed works.
  2. ↑ The misspelling is evation.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maria Ressa</span> Filipino and American journalist (born 1963)

Maria Angelita Ressa is a Filipino and American journalist. She is the co-founder and CEO of Rappler. She previously spent nearly two decades working as a lead investigative reporter in Southeast Asia for CNN. She will become Professor of Professional Practice in the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University on July 1, 2024, and will be a Distinguished Fellow at Columbia's new Institute of Global Politics beginning in the fall of 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ramon Tulfo</span> Filipino TV host and journalist

Ramon "Mon" Teshiba Tulfo Jr. is a Filipino TV host, radio broadcaster and columnist for The Philippine Star.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antonio Trillanes</span> Filipino politician (b. 1971)

Antonio Fuentes Trillanes IV is a retired Philippine naval officer who also served as a senator of the Philippines from 2007 to 2019. He is known for his involvement in the Oakwood mutiny of 2003 and the Manila Peninsula siege in 2007 in protest against the Arroyo administration, and as a vocal critic of the Duterte administration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mass media in the Philippines</span> Mass media in the Philippines

Mass media in the Philippines consists of several types of media: television, radio, newspapers, magazines, cinema, and websites.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lord Allan Velasco</span> Speaker of the House of Representatives of the Philippines from 2020 to 2022

Lord Allan Jay Quinto Velasco is a Filipino politician and lawyer who served as the Speaker of the House of Representatives from October 12, 2020 to June 2022. He is concurrently serving as the Representative of Marinduque's lone district since 2016, and previously from 2010 to 2013. He previously served as the Marinduque chapter president of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines, and Marinduque provincial administrator under Governor Jose Antonio Carrion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chel Diokno</span> Filipino lawyer

Jose Manuel Tadeo "Chel" Icasiano Diokno is a Filipino lawyer, educator, and human rights advocate. He serves as chairman of the Free Legal Assistance Group (FLAG), the founding dean of the De La Salle University College of Law, and the chairman of the Bantayog ng mga Bayani Foundation. He has served as a special counsel of the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee. He was a candidate for the Senate in 2019 and 2022. He also co-hosts the radio program Oras at Bayan on Veritas 846.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012</span> Law in the Philippines

The Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, officially recorded as Republic Act No. 10175, is a law in the Philippines that was approved on September 12, 2012. It aims to address legal issues concerning online interactions and the Internet in the Philippines. Among the cybercrime offenses included in the bill are cybersquatting, cybersex, child pornography, identity theft, illegal access to data and libel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rappler</span> News website company in the Philippines

Rappler is a Filipino online news website based in Pasig, Metro Manila, the Philippines. It was founded by 2021 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Maria Ressa along with a group of fellow Filipino journalists as well as technopreneurs. It started as a Facebook page named MovePH in August 2011 and evolved into a website on January 1, 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Killing of Jennifer Laude</span> Murder of a Filipina trans woman by a US Marine

On October 11, 2014, Jennifer Laude, a Filipina trans woman, was drowned to death by Joseph Scott Pemberton, a Lance Corporal in the United States Marine Corps in Olongapo, Philippines. Pemberton admitted assaulting Laude and deployed a trans panic defense in his 2015 trial. His charge was downgraded from murder to homicide by a judge in 2015, and he was convicted on December 1, 2015. Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte granted an absolute pardon to Pemberton in September 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Free Legal Assistance Group</span> Philippine non-profit organization

The Free Legal Assistance Group (FLAG) is a nationwide organization of human rights lawyers in the Philippines. It was founded in 1974 by Sen. Jose W. Diokno, Lorenzo Tañada, J.B.L. Reyes, and Joker Arroyo during the martial law era under former President Ferdinand Marcos. It is the first and largest group of human rights lawyers established in the nation. They work on countering varied abuses against human rights and civil liberties. Its current chairman since 2003 is human rights attorney Chel Diokno, the founding dean of the De La Salle University Tañada-Diokno School of Law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harry Roque</span> Filipino lawyer, politician and former presidential spokesperson

Herminio "Harry" Lopez Roque Jr. is a Filipino lawyer, politician, and former law professor. He served as the presidential spokesperson of President Rodrigo Duterte from 2017 to 2018 and from 2020 to 2021. He was the party-list representative of KABAYAN from 2016 to 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protests against Rodrigo Duterte</span> Political protests against former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte

Protests against Former President Rodrigo Duterte escalated on November 18, 2016, following Duterte's support of the burial of the late president Ferdinand Marcos. These series of protests are mostly conducted by progressive groups and other opposing figures mainly due to the ongoing war on drugs, the declaration of martial law in Mindanao, and employment issues such as contractual terms being applied by companies and inflation which occurred due to the passage of the Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion Law. Other causes of the protests include the government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the country, the passage of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020, and the shutdown and franchise denial of ABS-CBN.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vera Files</span> News organization in the Philippines

Vera Files is a non-profit online news organization in the Philippines, known for its institutionalized role in fact-checking false information in the Philippines, and as one of the news organizations most prominently targeted by intimidation and censorship due to its critical coverage of the Philippine government. It is part of the International Fact-Checking Network of the Poynter Institute and is one of Facebook's two Philippine partners in its third-party fact-checking program.

2019 in the Philippines details events of note that have occurred in the Philippines in 2019.

Since September 2018, allegations of an ouster plot against Rodrigo Duterte, the President of the Philippines, have been publicized by the military, who mainly implicated opposition figures and critics of the Duterte administration of involving in the plot. Several opposition groups who have been tagged heavily criticized their inclusion and subsequently denied the involvement in the plots.

The Kapa-Community Ministry International was one of the biggest financial investment fraud scandals in Philippine history. An estimated five million people were duped by the religious company Kapa-Community Ministry International, which promised a 30% monthly return on investments for life. Kapa started in 2016 as Kapa Coop Convenience Store and General Merchandise in the city of Bislig, founded by Pastor Joel Apolinario. The City Economic Enterprise Department (CEED) shut down the business for failing to comply with some provisions. In August 2017, Apolinario was charged with 102 cases for not settling claims; 27 arrest warrants were issued. However, all the cases were dismissed with the complainants compensated. Apolinario's company moved south, becoming Kapa-Community Ministry International. The company enlisted new recruits, who became member-donors and in turn recruited new members. On June 8, 2019, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte ordered the corporation to be shut down over the scheme.

2020 in the Philippines details events of note that have occurred in the Philippines in 2020. The year is largely defined by the COVID-19 pandemic that caused the national economy to go into recession would continued until the state of public health emergency was lifted in the country on July 22, 2023.

<i>Disini v. Secretary of Justice</i> Landmark ruling of the Supreme Court of the Philippines

Disini v. Secretary of Justice, 727 Phil. 28 (2014), is a landmark ruling of the Supreme Court of the Philippines handed down on February 18, 2014. When the Congress of the Philippines passed the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 the bill was immediately controversial, especially its strict penalties for the new crime of "cyberlibel", an upgraded form of the already existing criminal libel charge found in the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020</span> Philippine legislation

The Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020, officially designated as Republic Act No. 11479, is a counter-terrorism law intended to prevent, prohibit, and penalize terrorism in the Philippines. The law was passed by the 18th Congress and signed by President Rodrigo Duterte on July 3, 2020, effectively replacing the Human Security Act of 2007 on July 18, 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theodore Te</span> Filipino lawyer

Theodore "Ted" O. Te is a Filipino human rights lawyer, professor, and former Spokesperson of the Supreme Court of the Philippines during the tenure of Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno. He resigned on the position after Sereno was ousted.

References

  1. 1 2 NBI and Keng v. Rappler Inc., et al., XVI-INV-18C-00049( Philippine Department of Justice February 4, 2019), Text .p. 7
  2. 1 2 3 "Despite NBI flip-flop, DOJ to indict Rappler for cyber libel". Rappler. February 4, 2019. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ratcliffe, Rebecca (June 15, 2020). "Journalist Maria Ressa found guilty of 'cyberlibel' in Philippines". The Guardian . ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved June 15, 2020.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Rainelda H. Estacio-Montesa (June 15, 2020). "People of the Philippines v. Reynaldo Santos Jr., Maria Angelita Ressa and Rappler Inc". Manila Regional Trial Court. Retrieved June 15, 2020– via Abogado.com.ph.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Santos Jr., Reynaldo; Rufo, Aries (May 29, 2012). "CJ using SUVs of 'controversial' businessmen". Rappler. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
  6. 1 2 3 Orendain, Simone (October 3, 2012). "Cybercrime Law in Philippines Draws Protests". Voice of America . Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  7. 1 2 Buan, Lian (January 19, 2018). "NBI: Rappler can be liable for cyber libel despite non-retroactive law". Rappler. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Buan, Lian (June 15, 2020). "Maria Ressa, Rey Santos Jr convicted of cyber libel". Rappler. Retrieved June 15, 2020.
  9. 1 2 Buan, Lian (June 18, 2020). "'I'm scared to go to jail, I'm not as fearless as Maria', says Reynaldo Santos Jr". Rappler. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  10. ↑ Patag, Kristine Joy (July 12, 2022). "In rejecting Ressa appeal, CA says cyber libel can be filed over 15-year-old posts". Philstar . Retrieved August 24, 2022.
  11. ↑ Cabato, Regine (June 15, 2020). "Conviction of Maria Ressa, hard-hitting Philippine American journalist, sparks condemnation". The Washington Post. Retrieved June 16, 2020.
  12. 1 2 "Quash Maria Ressa and Rey Santos' conviction in the Philippines". Amnesty International. June 15, 2020. Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  13. 1 2 "Philippines: Rappler Verdict a Blow to Media Freedom". Human Rights Watch. June 15, 2020. Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  14. ↑ Editorial Board (June 15, 2020). "The Philippines slides toward autocracy". The Washington Post . Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  15. ↑ "SC extends TRO on cybercrime law". GMA News. February 5, 2013. Retrieved February 5, 2013.
  16. ↑ "SC won't lift TRO on cybercrime law". Sunstar. February 5, 2013. Archived from the original on February 12, 2013. Retrieved February 5, 2013.
  17. ↑ Merueñas, Mark (February 18, 2014). "Internet libel in cybercrime law constitutional – SC". GMA News. Retrieved May 20, 2016.
  18. ↑ Alquitran, Non; Ocampo, Junep (August 12, 2002). "Influential businessman eyed in ex-councilor's slay". The Philippine Star. Archived from the original on February 15, 2019. Retrieved June 18, 2020– via Google web cache via Archive.is.
  19. ↑ Rey, Aika (February 17, 2019). "PhilStar.com takes down 2002 article on Wilfredo Keng". Rappler. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  20. 1 2 "People of the Philippines v. Santos, Ressa and Rappler". Global Freedom of Expression. Columbia University . Retrieved August 17, 2022.
  21. ↑ "Philstar.com's statement on the 2002 article on Wilfredo Keng". The Philippine Star. February 16, 2019. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  22. 1 2 Buan, Lian (February 22, 2018). "NBI junks cyber libel complaint vs Rappler". Rappler. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  23. ↑ Keng, Wilfredo (December 20, 2017). "Affidavit-complaint". Makati. Retrieved June 18, 2020– via Scribd.
  24. ↑ Navallo, Mike (June 14, 2020). "How correcting a typo got Maria into trouble: The cyberlibel case vs Rappler". ABS-CBN News. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  25. ↑ Robles, Raissa (February 16, 2019). "OPINION: DOJ uses wrong law to justify charging Maria Ressa with cyber libel beyond 1-year prescriptive period". ABS-CBN News. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  26. ↑ "An act to establish periods of prescription for violations penalized by special acts and municipal ordinances and to provide when prescription shall begin to run". Section 1.d, Act No. 3326 of December 4, 1926. Philippine Legislature.
  27. ↑ Roque, H. Harry L. Jr. (February 23, 2017). "Chapter 9. The Philippine Supreme Court on Cyber Libel: Lost in Overbreadth". In Weisenhaus, Doreen; Young, Simon N. M. (eds.). Media Law and Policy in the Internet Age . Hart Publishing. pp. 127–140. doi:10.5040/9781782257417.ch-009. ISBN   978-1-78225-738-7.
  28. ↑ Pulta, Benjamin (February 6, 2019). "DOJ approves cyber libel raps vs. Rappler". Philippine News Agency . Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  29. ↑ Reilly, Katie (February 21, 2019). "The Message Behind Maria Ressa's Cyber Libel Arrest". Time. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  30. ↑ Navallo, Mike. "Ressa camp protests 'excessive' travel bond". ABS-CBN News. Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  31. ↑ Moran, Padraig (June 18, 2020). "Facing possible jail time totalling 100 years, journalist Maria Ressa says she won't stop fighting for justice". CBC News . Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  32. ↑ "Rappler's incorporation papers revoked by SEC". ABS-CBN News. January 15, 2018. Retrieved January 17, 2018.
  33. ↑ "Subpoenas sent to Rappler's Ressa, Bitanga for tax raps". ABS-CBN News. April 17, 2018. Retrieved April 18, 2018.
  34. ↑ Rita, Joviland (June 16, 2020). "Maria Ressa contradicts Roque claim that Duterte values press freedom". GMA News Online . Retrieved June 19, 2020. After the SONA in July 2017, Ressa said the first subpoena was issued against them. 'Within a few months in January 2018, we received a shutdown order, a revocation of our permit or license to operate.' 
  35. ↑ Diokno, Chel (June 14, 2020). Forum on the cyber libel verdict against Maria Ressa, Rappler (YouTube live stream). Rappler. Event occurs at 10:49. We fast forward to three years later, July 2017, the president now is Duterte, he issues a State of the Nation Address where he mentions Rappler and says that Rappler is fully owned by Americans. Soon after that, a week later, Rappler received its first subpoena, and then that became a barrage of cases.
  36. 1 2 Te, Theodore; Ressa, Maria (May 13, 2019). Maria Ressa arraigned for cyber libel; SC may be next option (YouTube video). Rappler. Event occurs at 0:00. Retrieved June 18, 2020. Te (Ressa's attorney): Ah, yes, the arraignment was conducted this morning and the information was read to the accused and both the accused did not enter a plea, so based on the Rules of Court, the judge entered a plea of not guilty for both of the accused.
  37. ↑ Ellis-Petersen, Hannah (July 23, 2019). "Philippines libel trial of journalist critical of Rodrigo Duterte begins". The Guardian . Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  38. ↑ Griffiths, James (June 15, 2020). "Philippines journalist Maria Ressa found guilty of 'cyber libel' in latest blow to free press". CNN Business . Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  39. 1 2 Fernandez, Ria (April 15, 2019). "Manila judge rejects Maria Ressa's motion to dismiss cyberlibel case". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  40. ↑ Requejo, Rey E. (November 20, 2019). "Court to hear cyberlibel case vs. Ressa, reporter". Manila Standard. Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  41. ↑ "Court to resume cyberlibel hearing vs Maria Ressa". Abogado. December 4, 2019. Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  42. ↑ "Forum on the cyber libel verdict against Maria Ressa, Rappler". Rappler. June 15, 2020. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  43. ↑ Pulta, Benjamin (June 15, 2020). "Manila court convicts Rappler CEO, writer on cyber libel". Philippine News Agency . Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  44. ↑ Nicole-Anne C. Lagrimas (June 15, 2020). "Court convicts Maria Ressa, ex-Rappler researcher of cyber libel". GMA News Online . Retrieved June 18, 2020. [N]either Ressa nor Santos took the witness stand.
  45. ↑ Buan, Lian (June 2, 2020). "Verdict on Rappler, Maria Ressa cyber libel case out June 15". Rappler. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  46. ↑ Nery, John (June 16, 2020). "A nauseous verdict, an ignorant judge". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  47. ↑ "Statement: Network condemns guilty verdict in cyber-libel case, says reasoning is based on falsehood, ignorance". Consortium on Democracy and Disinformation. June 16, 2020. Retrieved June 19, 2020. This "nomenclature" may be new to her, but it is not limited to Rappler and, it is, in fact so commonplace that to declare it "a clever ruse" to avoid liability shows Judge Estacio-Montesa's apparent unfamiliarity with the terrain that is journalism.
  48. ↑ "Wrong move? Judge Montesa surprised why Ressa, co-accused didn't take the stand". Abogado. June 15, 2020. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  49. ↑ Bengali, Shashank (June 15, 2020). "Philippine American journalist Maria Ressa convicted in cybercrime case". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  50. ↑ "Libel in the court". Scientia. University of the Philippines Diliman College of Science. June 16, 2020. Retrieved June 18, 2020– via Medium.
  51. ↑ Buan, Lian (June 15, 2020). "What Maria Ressa conviction means for reporting confidential sources". Rappler. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  52. ↑ Patag, Kristine Joy (July 26, 2022). "In appeal, Ressa and Santos question prescriptive period for cyber libel". Philstar.com . Retrieved August 16, 2022.
  53. ↑ Patag, Kristine Joy (October 10, 2022). "Appeals court junks Ressa cyber libel appeal; Supreme Court next". Philstar.com. Retrieved October 11, 2022.
  54. ↑ Laqui, Ian (March 25, 2024). "SC allows UN expert to act as 'friend of the court' in Maria Ressa's cyber libel plea". The Philippine Star . Retrieved March 25, 2024.
  55. ↑ Torres-Tupas, Tetch (March 25, 2024). "UN rapporteur allowed as 'friend of court' in Ressa's cyber libel case". Philippine Daily Inquirer . Retrieved March 25, 2024.
  56. ↑ Lagrimas, Nicole-Anne C. (December 3, 2020). "Maria Ressa charged with cyber libel for 2nd time". GMA News Online. Retrieved June 1, 2022.
  57. ↑ Buan, Lian (June 19, 2020). "Keng sues Ressa for cyber libel anew over a 2019 tweet". Rappler. Retrieved June 21, 2020.
  58. ↑ "Maria Ressa faces another cyber libel suit by same businessman over 2019 tweet". CNN Philippines . June 19, 2020. Retrieved June 21, 2020.
  59. ↑ Santos, Elmor (December 3, 2020). "Maria Ressa again charged with cyber libel, seeks case dismissal". CNN Philippines . Archived from the original on June 1, 2022. Retrieved May 31, 2020.
  60. 1 2 3 Virgin, Lopez (June 1, 2021). "Wilfredo Keng withdraws 2nd cyber libel case vs. Maria Ressa". GMA News Online. Retrieved June 1, 2022.
  61. ↑ "Businessman's withdrawal of cyber libel case vs Maria Ressa welcomed—lawyer". The Manila Times . June 3, 2021. Retrieved June 1, 2022.
  62. ↑ Scott, Liam (June 3, 2021). "Libel Case Dismissed, But Philippines Journalist Still Faces Legal Challenges". Voice of America . Retrieved June 1, 2022.
  63. 1 2 "Philippines: Holding the line against Duterte's attacks". Reporters Without Borders . April 20, 2020. Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  64. ↑ Johnson, Howard (January 17, 2018). "Why Rappler is raising Philippine press freedom fears". BBC News . Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  65. ↑ Melinda Quintos de Jesus; et al. (2004). Press Freedom in the Philippines: A Study in Contradictions. Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility. p. 7. ISBN   978-971-91955-6-6. [T]he courts have established a record of decisions liberally interpreting the law in favor of the press. [...] Nowhere in Southeast Asia are government officials so accessible to the press. Cabinet ministers are available from the earliest hours to answer questions from radio show hosts on the news of the day involving their responsibilities.
  66. ↑ Doronila, Amando; Coronel, Sheila S. (January 10, 2014). Losing control: freedom of the press in Asia (PDF). Canberra: Australian National University. pp. xii, 148. ISBN   978-1-925021-44-8. OCLC   862728315. (Doronila) [T]he press in the Philippines is probably the most unfettered in the region and replicates the western models of a free press[.] (Coronel) Nowadays, the Philippines boasts a rowdy and vibrant press which thinks of itself as the freest in Asia. With the fall of the Marcos regime, a 14-year-old system of media controls collapsed overnight.
  67. ↑ Shafer, Richard (1991). "Press Freedom in the Philippines: A Legacy of American Colonialism" . Journal of the Asian Media Information and Communication Centre. 18 (1). Taylor & Francis: 3–10. doi:10.1080/01296612.1991.11726348. ISSN   0129-6612.
  68. ↑ Ratcliffe, Rebecca (June 15, 2020). "Journalist Maria Ressa found guilty of 'cyberlibel' in Philippines". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  69. ↑ "Robredo: Maria Ressa guilty verdict tells gov't critics to 'keep quiet or you're next'". ABS-CBN News. June 15, 2020. Retrieved June 18, 2020– via Reuters , Agence France-Presse.
  70. ↑ Flores, Helen (June 17, 2020). "Hillary, Albright back Ressa on libel case". The Philippine Star. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  71. 1 2 Pelayo, Marje (June 16, 2020). "Malacanang reminds critics: Cyberlibel Act passed under Aquino Administration". UNTV News . Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  72. ↑ Buan, Lian (January 22, 2018). "Rappler libel complaint dangerous for media, bloggers – cyber lawyer". Rappler. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  73. ↑ Tomacruz, Sofia (June 16, 2020). "U.S. senators warn verdict vs Ressa sets 'dangerous precedent'". Rappler. Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  74. ↑ Battu-Henriksson, Virginie (June 16, 2020). "Philippines: Statement by the Spokesperson on the conviction of Maria Ressa and Reynaldo Santos". European External Action Service . European Commission . Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  75. 1 2 3 Pazzibugan, Dona Z. (June 18, 2020). "US State Department, EU, UN official 'concerned' about Ressa cyberlibel conviction". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  76. ↑ Sippy, Zachariah W.; Ball, Benjamin; et al. (June 16, 2020). "As Maria Ressa '86 holds the line, we must act now". The Daily Princetonian . Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  77. ↑ Roque, Harry (March 2, 2014). "High court on libel: Lost in overbreadth". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved June 6, 2020.
  78. ↑ "Maria Ressa, ex-Rappler writer can seek probation to avoid jail time — Roque". CNN Philippines. June 16, 2020. Archived from the original on June 21, 2020. Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  79. ↑ Esguerra, Darryl John (June 15, 2020). "Duterte supports press freedom, never sued journalists – Palace". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  80. ↑ "Palace maintains Supreme Court's ruling on libel". Presidential Communications Operations Office . June 15, 2020. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  81. ↑ Ranada, Pia (October 9, 2019). "Duterte gives Wilfredo Keng's daughter a government post". Rappler. Retrieved June 21, 2020.
  82. ↑ Rita, Joviland (June 17, 2020). "Appointments of Judge Montesa's husband, Keng's daughter do not affect integrity of verdict against Ressa —Roque". GMA News Online . Retrieved June 21, 2020.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.