Princeton field-reversed configuration

Last updated
One rotating magnetic field pulse of the PFRC-2 device during an experiment PFRC 2 pulse.jpg
One rotating magnetic field pulse of the PFRC-2 device during an experiment

The Princeton Field Reversed Configuration (PFRC) is a series of experiments in plasma physics, an experimental program to evaluate a configuration for a fusion power reactor, at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL). The experiment probes the dynamics of long-pulse, collisionless, [1] low s-parameter [2] field-reversed configurations (FRCs) formed with odd-parity rotating magnetic fields. [3] [4] FRCs are the evolution of the Greek engineer's Nicholas C. Christofilos original idea of E-layers which he developed for the Astron fusion reactor. [5] The PFRC program aims to experimentally verify the physics predictions that such configurations are globally stable and have transport levels comparable with classical magnetic diffusion. [2] It also aims to apply this technology to the Direct Fusion Drive concept for spacecraft propulsion. [6]

Contents

History

The PFRC was initially funded by the United States Department of Energy. Early in its operation it was contemporary with such RMF-FRCs as the Translation Confinement Sustainment experiment (TCS) and the Prairie View Rotamak (PV Rotamak).

At PPPL, the experiment PFRC-1 ran from 2008 through 2011. [7] PFRC-2 is running as of 2023. PFRC-3 is scheduled next. PFRC-4 is scheduled for the late-2020s. [7]

As of 2023 fusion had not been achieved.

Experiments and results

The PFRC-1 and PFRC-2 experiments have heated electrons to energies in excess of 100 eV and plasma durations to 300 ms, more than 104 times longer than the predicted tilt instability growth time. [8]

PFRC-1

PFRC-2

PFRC-2 experimental results [8]
ParameterValue
Pulse length300 ms
Magnetic field strengthto 350 G (vacuum )
RMF Frequency2-14 MHz
RMF Powerto 200 kW
RMF Coupling60%
Plasma temperature100 eV e- at 4.3 MHz
Plasma radius8 cm
Electron density1013 /cc
GasH2, He, Ne, Ar
Excluded flux0.6 mVs
Energy confinement time5x10-5 s

Odd-parity rotating magnetic field

The electric current that forms the field-reversed configuration (FRC) in the PFRC is driven by a rotating magnetic field (RMF). This method has been well-studied and produced favorable results in the Rotamak series of experiments. [9] However, rotating magnetic fields as applied in these and other experiments (so-called even parity RMFs) induce opening of the magnetic field lines. When a transverse magnetic field is applied to the axisymmetric equilibrium FRC magnetic field, rather than magnetic field lines closing on themselves and forming a closed region, they spiral around in the azimuthal direction and ultimately cross the separatrix surface which contains the closed FRC region. [3]

One rotating magnetic field pulse of the PFRC-2 device during an experiment, in slow motion PFRC-2 discharge.gif
One rotating magnetic field pulse of the PFRC-2 device during an experiment, in slow motion

The PFRC uses RMF antennae that produce a magnetic field which flips direction about a symmetry plane oriented with its normal along the axis, half-way along the length of the axis of the machine. This configuration is called an odd parity rotating magnetic field (RMFo). Such magnetic fields, when added in small magnitude to axisymmetric equilibrium magnetic fields, do not cause opening of the magnetic field lines and overall topology is preserved. [3] The critical threshold magnitude of 'odd parity' rotating magnetic field which opens up the axisymmetric equilibrium magnetic field lines and fundamentally changes field topology is rather high. [10] Thus, the RMF is not expected to contribute to transport of particles and energy out of the core of the PFRC.

Low s-parameter

In an FRC, the name s-parameter is given to the ratio of the distance between the magnetic null and the separatrix, and the thermal ion Larmor radius. That is how many ion orbits can fit between the core of the FRC and where it meets the bulk plasma. [2] A high-s FRC would have very small ion gyroradii compared to the size of the machine. Thus, at high s-parameter, the model of magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) applies. [11] MHD predicts that the FRC is unstable to the "n=1 tilt mode," in which the reversed field tilts 180 degrees to align with the applied magnetic field, destroying the FRC.

A low-s FRC is predicted to be stable to the tilt mode. [11] An s-parameter less than or equal to 2 is sufficient for this effect. However, only two ion radii between the hot core and the cool bulk means that on average only two scattering periods (velocity changes of on average 90 degrees) are sufficient to remove a hot, fusion-relevant ion from the core of the plasma. Thus the choice is between high s-parameter ions that are classically well confined but convectively poorly confined, and low s-parameter ions that are classically poorly confined but convectively well confined.

The PFRC has an s-parameter between 1 and 2. [2] Stabilizing the tilt-mode is predicted to aid confinement more than the small number of tolerable collisions will hurt confinement.

Spacecraft propulsion

Scientists from Princeton Satellite Systems are working on a new concept called Direct Fusion Drive (DFD) that is based on the PFRC but has one open end through which exhaust flows to generate thrust. [7] It would produce electric power and propulsion from a single compact fusion reactor. The first concept study and modeling (Phase I NASA NIAC) was published in 2017, [12] and was proposed to power the propulsion system of a Pluto orbiter and lander. [12] [13] Adding propellant to the cool plasma flow results in a variable thrust when channeled through a magnetic nozzle. Modeling suggests that the DFD might produce 5 Newtons of thrust per each megawatt of generated fusion power. [14] About 35% of the fusion power goes to thrust, 30% to electric power, 25% lost to heat, and 10% is recirculated for the radio frequency (RF) heating. [12] The concept was awarded a Phase II to further advance the design and shielding. [15]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Magnetic sail</span> Proposed spacecraft propulsion method

A magnetic sail is a proposed method of spacecraft propulsion where an onboard magnetic field source interacts with a plasma wind to form an artificial magnetosphere that acts as a sail, transferring force from the wind to the spacecraft requiring little to no propellant as detailed for each proposed magnetic sail design in this article.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory</span> National laboratory for plasma physics and nuclear fusion science at Princeton, New Jersey

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) is a United States Department of Energy national laboratory for plasma physics and nuclear fusion science. Its primary mission is research into and development of fusion as an energy source. It is known for the development of the stellarator and tokamak designs, along with numerous fundamental advances in plasma physics and the exploration of many other plasma confinement concepts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plasma stability</span> Degree to which disturbing a plasma system at equilibrium will destabilize it

In plasma physics, plasma stability concerns the stability properties of a plasma in equilibrium and its behavior under small perturbations. The stability of the system determines if the perturbations will grow, oscillate, or be damped out. It is an important consideration in topics such as nuclear fusion and astrophysical plasma.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inertial electrostatic confinement</span> Fusion power research concept

Inertial electrostatic confinement, or IEC, is a class of fusion power devices that use electric fields to confine the plasma rather than the more common approach using magnetic fields found in magnetic confinement fusion (MCF) designs. Most IEC devices directly accelerate their fuel to fusion conditions, thereby avoiding energy losses seen during the longer heating stages of MCF devices. In theory, this makes them more suitable for using alternative aneutronic fusion fuels, which offer a number of major practical benefits and makes IEC devices one of the more widely studied approaches to fusion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Field-reversed configuration</span> Magnetic confinement fusion reactor

A field-reversed configuration (FRC) is a type of plasma device studied as a means of producing nuclear fusion. It confines a plasma on closed magnetic field lines without a central penetration. In an FRC, the plasma has the form of a self-stable torus, similar to a smoke ring.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spheromak</span>

A spheromak is an arrangement of plasma formed into a toroidal shape similar to a smoke ring. The spheromak contains large internal electric currents and their associated magnetic fields arranged so the magnetohydrodynamic forces within the spheromak are nearly balanced, resulting in long-lived (microsecond) confinement times without external fields. Spheromaks belong to a type of plasma configuration referred to as the compact toroids. A spheromak can be made and sustained using magnetic flux injection, leading to a dynomak.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Madison Symmetric Torus</span>

The Madison Symmetric Torus (MST) is a reversed field pinch (RFP) physics experiment with applications to both fusion energy research and astrophysical plasmas.

A dense plasma focus (DPF) is a type of plasma generating system originally developed as a fusion power device starting in the early 1960s. The system demonstrated scaling laws that suggested it would not be useful in the commercial power role, and since the 1980s it has been used primarily as a fusion teaching system, and as a source of neutrons and X-rays.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Helically Symmetric Experiment</span>

The Helically Symmetric Experiment, is an experimental plasma confinement device at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, with design principles that are intended to be incorporated into a fusion reactor. The HSX is a modular coil stellarator which is a toroid-shaped pressure vessel with external electromagnets which generate a magnetic field for the purpose of containing a plasma. It began operation in 1999.

TAE Technologies, formerly Tri Alpha Energy, is an American company based in Foothill Ranch, California developing aneutronic fusion power. The company's design relies on an advanced beam-driven field-reversed configuration (FRC), which combines features from accelerator physics and other fusion concepts in a unique fashion, and is optimized for hydrogen-boron fuel, also known as proton-boron or p-11B. It regularly publishes theoretical and experimental results in academic journals with hundreds of publications and posters at scientific conferences and in a research library hosting these articles on its website. TAE has developed five generations of original fusion platforms with a sixth currently in development. It aims to manufacture a prototype commercial fusion reactor by 2030.

The Prairie View (PV) Rotamak is a plasma physics experiment at Prairie View A&M University. The experiment studies magnetic plasma confinement to support controlled nuclear fusion experiments. Specifically, the PV Rotamak can be used as either a spherical tokamak or a field-reversed configuration. Some time between 2015 and 2017, most personnel moved on to advanced career opportunities. In 2017, a Final Report to Department of Energy (DOE) was prepared and submitted by Dr. Saganti of PVAMU on the entire research work supported by DOE for 12 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Direct Fusion Drive</span> Conceptual rocket engine

Direct Fusion Drive (DFD) is a conceptual, low radioactivity, nuclear-fusion rocket engine, designed to produce both thrust and electric power, suitable for interplanetary spacecraft. The concept is based on the Princeton field-reversed configuration reactor, invented in 2002 by Samuel A. Cohen. It is being modeled and experimentally tested at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, a U.S. Department of Energy facility, as well as modeled and evaluated by Princeton Satellite Systems (PSS). As of 2018, a direct fusion drive project driven by NASA is said to have entered its simulation phase, presented as the second phase of the concept's evolution.

The Star Thrust Experiment (STX) was a plasma physics experiment at the University of Washington's Redmond Plasma Physics Laboratory which ran from 1999 to 2001. The experiment studied magnetic plasma confinement to support controlled nuclear fusion experiments. Specifically, STX pioneered the possibility of forming a Field-reversed configuration (FRC) by using a Rotating Magnetic Field (RMF).

The Translation Confinement Sustainment experiment (TCS) was a plasma physics experiment at the University of Washington's Redmond Plasma Physics Laboratory from 2002 until 2009. The experiment studied magnetic plasma confinement to support controlled nuclear fusion experiments. Specifically, TCS pioneered the sustainment and heating of a Field-Reversed Configuration (FRC) by Rotating Magnetic Field (RMF).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Compact Toroidal Hybrid</span>

The Compact Toroidal Hybrid (CTH) is an experimental device at Auburn University that uses magnetic fields to confine high-temperature plasmas. CTH is a torsatron type of stellarator with an external, continuously wound helical coil that generates the bulk of the magnetic field for containing a plasma.

Dmitri Dmitriyevich Ryutov is a Russian theoretical plasma physicist.

Noah Hershkowitz was an American experimental plasma physicist. He was known for his pioneering research on the understanding of plasma sheaths, solitons and double layers in plasmas, as well as the development of the emissive probe which measures the plasma potential.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wendelstein 7-AS</span> Stellarator for plasma fusion experiments (1988-2002)

Wendelstein 7-AS was an experimental stellarator which was in operation from 1988 to 2002 by the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (IPP) in Garching. It was the first of a new class of advanced stellarators with modular coils, designed with the goal of developing a nuclear fusion reactor to generate electricity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Omnigeneity</span> A concept in stellarator physics

Omnigeneity is a property of a magnetic field inside a magnetic confinement fusion reactor. Such a magnetic field is called omnigenous if the path a single particle takes does not drift radially inwards or outwards on average. A particle is then confined to stay on a flux surface. All tokamaks are exactly omnigenous by virtue of their axisymmetry, and conversely an unoptimized stellarator is generally not omnigenous.

References

  1. ↑ Cohen, S. A.; Berlinger, B.; Brunkhorst, C.; Brooks, A.; Ferraro, N.; Lundberg, D. P.; Roach, A.; Glasser, A. H. (2007). "Formation of Collisionless High-β Plasmas by Odd-Parity Rotating Magnetic Fields". Physical Review Letters. 98 (14): 145002. Bibcode:2007PhRvL..98n5002C. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.145002. PMID   17501282.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Cohen, Samuel A. (June 4, 2008). "Field-reversed configuration: Community input to FESAC" (PDF). General Atomics Fusion Energy Research. General Atomics. Retrieved December 11, 2015.
  3. 1 2 3 Cohen, S. A.; Milroy, R. D. (2000-06-01). "Maintaining the closed magnetic-field-line topology of a field-reversed configuration with the addition of static transverse magnetic fields". Physics of Plasmas. 7 (6): 2539–2545. Bibcode:2000PhPl....7.2539C. doi:10.1063/1.874094. ISSN   1070-664X.
  4. ↑ Glasser, A. H.; Cohen, S. A. (2002-05-01). "Ion and electron acceleration in the field-reversed configuration with an odd-parity rotating magnetic field". Physics of Plasmas. 9 (5): 2093–2102. Bibcode:2002PhPl....9.2093G. doi:10.1063/1.1459456. ISSN   1070-664X.
  5. ↑ Reinders, L. J. (2021). The Fairy Tale of Nuclear Fusion. Cham: Springer International Publishing. p. 83. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64344-7. ISBN   978-3-030-64343-0. S2CID   241339825.
  6. ↑ Paluszek, Michael; Thomas, Stephanie (2019-02-01). "Direct Fusion Drive". Princeton Satellite Systems. Retrieved 2019-06-17.
  7. 1 2 3 Wall, Mike (2019-06-11). "Fusion-Powered Spacecraft Could Be Just a Decade Away". Space.com. Future US. Retrieved 2019-06-17.
  8. 1 2 Galea, Christopher; Thomas, Stephanie; Paluszek, Michael; Cohen, Samuel (2023-01-15). "The Princeton Field-Reversed Configuration for Compact Nuclear Fusion Power Plants". Journal of Fusion Energy. 42 (4). doi:10.1007/s10894-023-00342-2. OSTI   1957531. S2CID   256392939.
  9. ↑ Jones, Ieuan R. (1999-05-01). "A review of rotating magnetic field current drive and the operation of the rotamak as a field-reversed configuration (Rotamak-FRC) and a spherical tokamak (Rotamak-ST)". Physics of Plasmas. 6 (5): 1950–1957. Bibcode:1999PhPl....6.1950J. doi:10.1063/1.873452. ISSN   1070-664X.
  10. ↑ Ahsan, T.; Cohen, S. A. (July 2022). "An analytical approach to evaluating magnetic-field closure and topological changes in FRC devices". Physics of Plasmas. 29 (7): 072507. Bibcode:2022PhPl...29g2507A. doi: 10.1063/5.0090163 . S2CID   251140943.
  11. 1 2 Barnes, Daniel C.; Schwarzmeier, James L.; Lewis, H. Ralph; Seyler, Charles E. (1986-08-01). "Kinetic tilting stability of field-reversed configurations". Physics of Fluids. 29 (8): 2616–2629. Bibcode:1986PhFl...29.2616B. doi:10.1063/1.865503. ISSN   0031-9171.
  12. 1 2 3 Thomas, Stephanie (2017). "Fusion-Enabled Pluto Orbiter and Lander – Phase I Final Report" (PDF). NASA Technical Reports Server. Princeton Satellite Systems. Retrieved 2019-06-14.
  13. ↑ Hall, Loura (April 5, 2017). "Fusion-Enabled Pluto Orbiter and Lander". NASA. Retrieved July 14, 2018.
  14. ↑ Thomas, Stephanie J.; Paluszek, Michael; Cohen, Samuel A.; Glasser, Alexander (2018). Nuclear and Future Flight Propulsion – Modeling the Thrust of the Direct Fusion Drive. 2018 Joint Propulsion Conference. Cincinnati, Ohio: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. doi:10.2514/6.2018-4769 . Retrieved 2019-06-14.
  15. ↑ Thomas, Stephanie (2019). "Fusion-Enabled Pluto Orbiter and Lander – NIAC Phase II Final Report". NASA Technical Reports Server. Princeton Satellite Systems. Retrieved 2023-07-11.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.