Compact Toroidal Hybrid

Last updated
Compact Toroidal Hybrid
Compact Toroidal Hybrid.jpg
Device type Stellarator
Location Alabama, United States
Affiliation Auburn University
Technical specifications
Major radius0.75 m (2 ft 6 in)
Minor radius0.29 m (11 in)
Plasma volume0.6  m3
Magnetic field 0.4–0.7 T (4,000–7,000 G)
Heating power10  kW (ECH)
100  kW (ohmic)
History
Year(s) of operation2005–present
Preceded byCompact Auburn Torsatron

The Compact Toroidal Hybrid (CTH) [1] is an experimental device at Auburn University that uses magnetic fields to confine high-temperature plasmas. [2] [3] CTH is a torsatron type of stellarator with an external, continuously wound helical coil that generates the bulk of the magnetic field for containing a plasma.

Contents

Background

Toroidal magnetic confinement fusion devices create magnetic fields that lie in a torus. These magnetic fields consist of two components, one component points in the direction that goes the long way around the torus (the toroidal direction), while the other component points in the direction that is the short way around the torus (the poloidal direction). The combination of the two components creates a helically shaped field. (You might imagine taking a flexible stick of candy cane and connecting the two ends.) Stellarator type devices generate all required magnetic fields with external magnetic coils. This is different from tokamak devices where the toroidal magnetic field is generated by external coils and the poloidal magnetic field is produced by an electrical current flowing through the plasma.

A drawing showing the CTH vacuum vessel (shown in grey) and magnetic field coils.HF(red) - Helical Field,TF - Toroidal Field,OH1,2,3 - Ohmic Transformer Coils, MVF - Main Vertical Field, TVF - Trim Vertical Field, SVF - Shaping Vertical Field, RF - Radial Field, EF, Equilibrium Field, ECC - Error Correction Coil CTHdrawing.png
A drawing showing the CTH vacuum vessel (shown in grey) and magnetic field coils.HF(red) - Helical Field,TF - Toroidal Field,OH1,2,3 - Ohmic Transformer Coils, MVF - Main Vertical Field, TVF - Trim Vertical Field, SVF - Shaping Vertical Field, RF - Radial Field, EF, Equilibrium Field, ECC - Error Correction Coil

The CTH device

The main magnetic field in CTH is generated by a continuously wound helical coil. An auxiliary set of ten coils produces a toroidal field much like that of a tokamak. This toroidal field is used to vary the rotational transform of the confining magnetic field structure. CTH typically operates at a magnetic field of 0.5 to 0.6 tesla at the center of the plasma. CTH can be operated as a pure stellarator, but also has ohmic heating transformer system to drive electrical current in the plasma. This current produces a poloidal magnetic field that, in addition to heating the plasma, changes the rotational transform of the magnetic field. CTH researchers study how well the plasma is confined while they vary the source of rotational transform from external coils to plasma current.

The CTH vacuum vessel is made of Inconel 625, which has a higher electrical resistance and lower magnetic permeability than stainless steel. Plasma formation and heating is achieved using 14 GHz, 10 kW electron cyclotron resonance heating (ECRH). A 200 kW gyrotron has recently been installed on CTH. Ohmic heating on CTH has an input power of 100 kW.

Operations

Subsystems

The following gives a list of subsystems needed for CTH operation.

  • a set of 10 GE752 motors with attached 1-ton flywheels to store energy and produce currents for magnetic field generation
  • two 18 GHz klystrons for Electron cyclotron resonance heating
  • gyrotron for 2nd harmonic Electron cyclotron resonance heating
  • a 2 kV, 50 μF capacitor bank and a 1 kV, 3 F capacitor bank to power the ohmic system
  • a 640 channel data acquisition system

Diagnostics

The CTH has a large set of diagnostics to measure properties of plasma and magnetic fields. The following gives a list of major diagnostics.

V3FIT

Last closed magnetic flux surfaces as reconstructed by the V3FIT code without (left) and with (right) plasma current. The coloration depicts the strength of the magnetic field with red being the strongest field and blue being the weakest. Sample field lines are shown in white. Ma figure 4.png
Last closed magnetic flux surfaces as reconstructed by the V3FIT code without (left) and with (right) plasma current. The coloration depicts the strength of the magnetic field with red being the strongest field and blue being the weakest. Sample field lines are shown in white.

V3FIT [5] is a code to reconstruct the equilibrium between the plasma and confining magnetic field in cases where the magnetic field is toroidal in nature, but not axisymmetric as is the case with tokamak equilibria. Because stellarators are non-axisymmetric, the CTH group uses the V3FIT and VMEC [6] codes for reconstructing equilibria. The V3FIT code uses as inputs the currents in the magnetic confinement coils, the plasma current, and data from the various diagnostics such as the Rogowski coils, SXR cameras, and interferometer. The output of the V3FIT code includes the structure of the magnetic field, and profiles of the plasma current, density, and SXR emissivity. Data from the CTH experiment was and continues to be used as a testbed for the V3FIT code which has also used for equilibrium reconstruction on the Helically Symmetric eXperiment (HSX), Large Helical Device (LHD), and Wendelstein 7-X (W7-X) stellarators, and the Reversed-Field eXperiment (RFX) and Madison Symmetric Torus (MST) reversed field pinches.

Goals and major achievements

CTH has made and continues to make fundamental contributions to the physics of current carrying stellarators. [7] [8] [9] CTH researchers have studied disruption limits and characterizations as a function of the externally applied rotational transform (due to external magnet coils) for:

Ongoing experiments

CTH students and staff work on a number of experimental and computational research projects. Some of these are solely in house while others are in collaboration with other universities and national laboratories in the United States and abroad. Current research projects include:

History

Auburn Torsatron
Auburn Torsatron.jpg
Device type Stellarator
Location Alabama, United States
Affiliation Auburn University
Technical specifications
Major radius0.58 m (1 ft 11 in)
Minor radius0.14 m (5.5 in)
Magnetic field < 0.2 T (2,000 G)
History
Year(s) of operation1983–1990
Succeeded byCompact Auburn Torsatron
Compact Auburn Torsatron
CATphoto2.jpg
Device type Stellarator
Location Alabama, United States
Affiliation Auburn University
Technical specifications
Major radius0.53 m (1 ft 9 in)
Minor radius0.11 m (4.3 in)
Plasma volume0.12  m3
Magnetic field 0.1 T (1,000 G)
History
Year(s) of operation1990–2000
Preceded byAuburn Torsatron
Succeeded byCompact Toroidal Hybrid

CTH is the third torsatron device to be built at Auburn University. Previous Magnetic Confinement Devices built at the university were:

The Auburn Torsatron (1983–1990)

The Auburn Torsatron had an l=2, m=10 helical coil. The vacuum vessel had a major radius was Ro = 0.58 m with a minor radius of av=0.14 m. The magnetic field strength was |B| ≤ 0.2 T and plasmas were formed with ECRH using a 2.45 GHz magnetron taken from a microwave oven. The Auburn Torsatron was used to study basic plasma physics and diagnostics, and magnetic surface mapping techniques [12] [13]

The Compact Auburn Torsatron (1990–2000)

The Compact Auburn Torsatron (CAT) had two helical coils, an l=1,m=5 and an l=2,m=5 whose currents could be controlled independently. [14] Varying the relative currents between the helical coils modified the rotational transform. The vacuum vessel major radius was Ro = 0.53 m with a plasma minor radius of av=0.11 m. The steady state magnetic field strength was |B| 0.1 T. CAT plasmas were formed with ECRH using a low ripple, 6 kW, 2.45 GHz magnetron source. CAT was used to study magnetic islands, [15] magnetic island minimization, [16] and driven plasma rotations [17]

Other Stellarators

Below is a list of other Stellarators in the US and around the world:

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stellarator</span> Plasma device using external magnets to confine plasma

A stellarator is a plasma device that relies primarily on external magnets to confine a plasma. Scientists researching magnetic confinement fusion aim to use stellarator devices as a vessel for nuclear fusion reactions. The name refers to the possibility of harnessing the power source of the stars, such as the Sun. It is one of the earliest fusion power devices, along with the z-pinch and magnetic mirror.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plasma stability</span>

The stability of a plasma is an important consideration in the study of plasma physics. When a system containing a plasma is at equilibrium, it is possible for certain parts of the plasma to be disturbed by small perturbative forces acting on it. The stability of the system determines if the perturbations will grow, oscillate, or be damped out.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Magnetic confinement fusion</span> Plasma fuel confined by magnetic fields

Magnetic confinement fusion is an approach to generate thermonuclear fusion power that uses magnetic fields to confine fusion fuel in the form of a plasma. Magnetic confinement is one of two major branches of fusion energy research, along with inertial confinement fusion. The magnetic approach began in the 1940s and absorbed the majority of subsequent development.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Field-reversed configuration</span> Magnetic confinement fusion reactor

A field-reversed configuration (FRC) is a type of plasma device studied as a means of producing nuclear fusion. It confines a plasma on closed magnetic field lines without a central penetration. In an FRC, the plasma has the form of a self-stable torus, similar to a smoke ring.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spheromak</span>

A spheromak is an arrangement of plasma formed into a toroidal shape similar to a smoke ring. The spheromak contains large internal electric currents and their associated magnetic fields arranged so the magnetohydrodynamic forces within the spheromak are nearly balanced, resulting in long-lived (microsecond) confinement times without external fields. Spheromaks belong to a type of plasma configuration referred to as the compact toroids. A spheromak can be made and sustained using magnetic flux injection, leading to a dynomak.

The H-1NF was a research institute of the H-1 heliac, a large stellarator device located in the ANU Research School of Physics at Canberra, Australia. It was established when the H-1 heliac was promoted to a national facility in 1996, adopting H-1NF as its facility name. In 2022 the H-1 heliac was disassembled before being shipped to its new home in China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Compact Stellarator Experiment</span>

The National Compact Stellarator Experiment, NCSX in short, was a magnetic fusion energy experiment based on the stellarator design being constructed at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wendelstein 7-X</span>

The Wendelstein 7-X reactor is an experimental stellarator built in Greifswald, Germany, by the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (IPP), and completed in October 2015. Its purpose is to advance stellarator technology: though this experimental reactor will not produce electricity, it is used to evaluate the main components of a future fusion power plant; it was developed based on the predecessor Wendelstein 7-AS experimental reactor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Helically Symmetric Experiment</span>

The Helically Symmetric Experiment, is an experimental plasma confinement device at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, with design principles that are intended to be incorporated into a fusion reactor. The HSX is a modular coil stellarator which is a toroid-shaped pressure vessel with external electromagnets which generate a magnetic field for the purpose of containing a plasma. It began operation in 1999.

Trisops was an experimental machine for the study of magnetic confinement of plasmas with the ultimate goal of producing fusion power. The configuration was a variation of a compact toroid, a toroidal (doughnut-shaped) structure of plasma and magnetic fields with no coils penetrating the center. It lost funding in its original form in 1978.

A plasma railgun is a linear accelerator which, like a projectile railgun, uses two long parallel electrodes to accelerate a "sliding short" armature. However, in a plasma railgun, the armature and ejected projectile consists of plasma, or hot, ionized, gas-like particles, instead of a solid slug of material. Scientific plasma railguns are typically operated in vacuum and not at air pressure. They are of value because they produce muzzle velocities of up to several hundreds of kilometers per second. Because of this, these devices have applications in magnetic confinement fusion (MCF), magneto-inertial fusion (MIF), high energy density physics research (HEDP), laboratory astrophysics, and as a plasma propulsion engine for spacecraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hybrid Illinois Device for Research and Applications</span> Toroidal magnetic fusion device

The Hybrid Illinois Device for Research and Applications (HIDRA) is a medium-sized toroidal magnetic fusion device housed in the Nuclear Radiation Laboratory and operated by the Center for Plasma-Material Interactions (CPMI) within the Department of Nuclear, Plasma and Radiological Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, United States. HIDRA had its first plasma at the end of April 2016 and started experimental campaigns by December of that year. HIDRA is the former WEGA classical stellarator that was operated at the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics in Greifswald Germany from 2001 to 2013.

The Model C stellarator was the first large-scale stellarator to be built, during the early stages of fusion power research. Planned since 1952, construction began in 1961 at what is today the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL). The Model C followed the table-top sized Model A, and a series of Model B machines that refined the stellarator concept and provided the basis for the Model C, which intended to reach break-even conditions. Model C ultimately failed to reach this goal, producing electron temperatures of 400 eV when about 100,000 were needed. In 1969, after UK researchers confirmed that the USSR's T-3 tokamak was reaching 1000 eV, the Model C was converted to the Symmetrical Tokamak, and stellarator development at PPPL ended.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">TJ-II</span>

TJ-II is a flexible Heliac installed at Spain's National Fusion Laboratory.

Uragan-2M is a stellarator installed at the Institute of Plasma Physics National Science Center, which is part of the Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology in Kharkiv, Ukraine. It was the largest stellarator (torsatron) in Europe until the construction of Wendelstein 7-X.

Katherine Ella Mounce Weimer was a research physicist at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory at the Princeton University. She is known for her scientific research in the field of plasma magnetohydrodynamic equilibrium and contribution to stability theory of a magnetically confined plasma.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wendelstein 7-AS</span> Stellarator for plasma fusion experiments (1988-2002)

Wendelstein 7-AS was an experimental stellarator which was in operation from 1988 to 2002 by the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (IPP) in Garching. It was the first of a new class of advanced stellarators with modular coils, designed with the goal of developing a nuclear fusion reactor to generate electricity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Omnigeneity</span> A concept in stellarator physics

Omnigeneity is a property of a magnetic field inside a magnetic confinement fusion reactor. Such a magnetic field is called omnigenous if the path a single particle takes does not drift radially inwards or outwards on average. A particle is then confined to stay on a flux surface. All tokamaks are exactly omnigenous by virtue of their axisymmetry, and conversely an unoptimized stellarator is generally not omnigenous.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flux surface</span>

In magnetic confinement fusion, a flux surface is a surface on which magnetic field lines lie. Since the magnetic field is divergence-free, the Poincare-Hopf theorem implies that such a surface must be either a torus, or a knot. In the tokamak and the stellarator flux surfaces have toroidal shapes, whereas the more exotic knotatron has a knotted flux surface. Flux surfaces are typically characterized the poloidal magnetic flux or the toroidal magnetic flux. The poloidal flux is the magnetic flux passing through a ribbon going from the magnetic axis to the flux surface, and the toroidal flux is the magnetic flux passing through a circle which encloses the magnetic axis. The total flux passing through flux surface itself is zero, as magnetic field lines are everywhere tangent to the surface.

References

  1. Hartwell, G. J.; Knowlton, S. F.; Hanson, J. D.; Ennis, D. A.; Maurer, D. A. (2017). "Design, Construction, and Operation of the Compact Toroidal Hybrid". Fusion Science and Technology. 72 (1): 76. doi:10.1080/15361055.2017.1291046. S2CID   125968882.
  2. "Simulations of the Compact Toroidal Hybrid using NIMROD" (PDF). Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. United States: PPPL, United States Department of Energy. 13 November 2011. p. 18.
  3. Bader, Aaron (ORCID:000000026003374X); Hegna, C. C.; Cianciosa, Mark R. (ORCID:0000000162115311); Hartwell, G. J. (2018-03-16). "Minimum magnetic curvature for resilient divertors using Compact Toroidal Hybrid geometry". Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. United States: Office of Scientific and Technical Information, United States Department of Energy. 60 (5): 054003. doi:10.1088/1361-6587/aab1ea. OSTI   1426567. S2CID   49537840 . Retrieved 2019-09-27.
  4. Herfindal, J.L.; Dawson, J.D.; Ennis, D.A.; Hartwell, G.J.; Loch, S.D.; Maurer, D.A. (2014). "Design and initial operation of a two-color soft x-ray camera system on the Compact Toroidal Hybrid experiment". Review of Scientific Instruments. 85 (11): 11D850. doi:10.1063/1.4892540. PMID   25430263.
  5. Hanson, J.D.; Hirshman, S.P.; Knowlton, S.F.; Lao, L.L.; Lazarus, E.A.; Shields, J.M. (2009). "V3FIT: a code for three-dimensional equilibrium reconstruction". Nuclear Fusion. 49 (7): 075031. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/49/7/075031. S2CID   122663807.
  6. Hirshman, S.P.; Whitson, J.C. (1983). "Steepest‐descent moment method for three‐dimensional magnetohydrodynamic equilibria". Physics of Fluids. 26 (12): 3553. doi:10.1063/1.864116. OSTI   5537804.
  7. Ma, X.; Cianciosa, M.R.; Ennis, D.A.; Hanson, J.D.; Hartwell, G.J.; Herfindal, J.L.; Howell, E.C.; Knowlton, S.F.; Maurer, D.A.; Tranverso, P.J. (2018). "Determination of current and rotational transform profiles in a current-carrying stellarator using soft x-ray emissivity measurements". Physics of Plasmas. 25: 012516. doi:10.1063/1.5013347. OSTI   1418890.
  8. Roberds, N.A.; Guazzotto, L.; Hanson, J.D.; Herfindal, J.L.; Howell, E.C.; Maurer, D.A.; Sovinec, C.R. (2016). "Simulations of sawtoothing in a current carrying stellarator". Physics of Plasmas. 23 (9): 092513. doi:10.1063/1.4962990.
  9. Ma, X.; Maurer, D.A.; Knowlton, S.F.; ArchMiller, M.C.; Cianciosa, M.R.; Ennis, D.A.; Hanson, J.D.; Hartwell, G.J.; Hebert, J.D.; Herfindal, J.L.; Pandya, M.D.; Roberds, N.A.; Traverso, P.J. (2015). "Non-axisymmetric equilibrium reconstruction of a current-carrying stellarator using external magnetic and soft x-ray inversion radius measurements". Physics of Plasmas. 22 (12): 122509. doi:10.1063/1.4938031. OSTI   1263869.
  10. Pandya, M.D.; ArchMiller, M.C.; Cianciosa, M.R.; Ennis, D.A.; Hanson, J.D.; Hartwell, G.J.; Hebert, J.D.; Herfinday, J.L.; Knowlton, S.F.; Ma, X.; Massida, S.; Maurer, D.A.; Roberds, N.A.; Traverso, P.J. (2015). "Low edge safety factor operation and passive disruption avoidance in current carrying plasmas by the addition of stellarator rotational transform". Physics of Plasmas. 22 (11): 110702. doi:10.1063/1.4935396.
  11. ArchMiller, M.C.; Cianciosa, M.R.; Ennis, D.A.; Hanson, J.D.; Hartwell, G.J.; Hebert, J.D; Herfindal, J.L.; Knowlton, S.F.; Ma, X.; Maurer, D.A.; Pandya, M.D.; Tranverso, P.J. (2014). "Suppression of vertical instability in elongated current-carrying plasmas by applying stellarator rotational transform". Physics of Plasmas. 21 (5): 056113. doi:10.1063/1.4878615.
  12. Gandy, R. F.; Henderson, M. A.; Hanson, J. D.; Hartwell, G. J.; Swanson, D. G. (1987). "Magnetic Surface Mapping with an Emissive Filament Technique on the Auburn Torsatron". Review of Scientific Instruments. 58 (4): 509–515. doi:10.1063/1.1139261.
  13. Hartwell, G. J.; Gandy, R. F.; Henderson, M. A.; Hanson, J. D.; Swanson, D. G.; Bush, C.J.; Colchin, R. J.; England, A. C.; Lee, D.K. (1988). "Magnetic Surface Mapping with Highly Transparent Screens on the Auburn Torsatron". Review of Scientific Instruments. 59 (3): 460–466. doi:10.1063/1.1139861.
  14. Gandy, R.F.; Henderson, M.A.; Hanson, J.D.; Knowlton, S.F.; Schneider, T.A.; Swanson, D.G.; Cary, J.R. (1990). "Design of the Compact Auburn Torsatron". Fusion Technology. 18 (2): 281. doi:10.13182/FST90-A29300. OSTI   5454593.
  15. Henderson, M. A.; Gandy, R. F.; Hanson, J. D.; Knowlton, S. F.; Swanson, D. G. (1992). "Measurement of magnetic surfaces on the Compact Auburn Torsatron". Review of Scientific Instruments. 63 (12): 5678–5684. doi:10.1063/1.1143349.
  16. Gandy, R. F.; Hartwell, G. J.; Hanson, J. D.; Knowlton, S. F.; Lin, H. (1994). "Magnetic island control on the Compact Auburn Torsatron". Physics of Plasmas. 1 (5): 1576–1582. doi:10.1063/1.870709.
  17. Thomas, Jr., .E; Knowlton, S. F.; Gandy, R. F.; Cooney, J.; Prichard, D.; Pruitt, T. (1998). "Driven plasma rotation in the Compact Auburn Torsatron". Physics of Plasmas. 5 (11): 3991–3998. doi:10.1063/1.873120.