Dynomak

Last updated
A model showing the formation of a spheromak from chaotic start. A dynomak is a spheromak formed by injecting magnetic flux. Dynomak Formation.png
A model showing the formation of a spheromak from chaotic start. A dynomak is a spheromak formed by injecting magnetic flux.

Dynomak is a spheromak [1] fusion reactor concept developed by the University of Washington using U.S. Department of Energy funding. [2] [3]

Contents

A dynomak is defined as a spheromak that is started and maintained by magnetic flux injection. A dynomak is formed when an alternating current is used to induce a magnetic flux into plasma. An electric alternating current transformer uses the same induction process to create a secondary current. Once formed, the plasma inside a dynomak relaxes into its lowest energy state, while conserving overall flux. [4] [5] This is termed a Taylor state and inside the machine what is formed is a plasma structure named a spheromak. A dynomak is a kind of spheromak that is started and driven by externally induced magnetic fields.

Technical roots

Spheromak formation Spheromak Formation In Dynomak - Model.png
Spheromak formation

Plasma is a fluid that conducts electricity, which gives it the unique property that it can be self-structured into smoke-ring-like objects such as field-reversed configurations and spheromaks. A structured plasma has the advantage that it is hotter, denser and more controllable which makes it a good choice for a fusion reactor. [6] But forming these plasma structures has been challenging since the first structures were observed in 1959 [7] [8] [9] because they are inherently unstable.

In 1974, Dr. John B Taylor proposed that a spheromak could be formed by inducing a magnetic flux into a loop plasma. The plasma would then relax naturally into a spheromak also termed a Taylor state. [10] [5] This process worked if the plasma:

Later, in 1979, these claims were checked by Marshall Rosenbluth. [11] In 1974, Dr. Taylor could only use results from the ZETA pinch device to back up these claims. But, since then, Taylor states have been formed in multiple machines including:

The dynomak evolved from the HIT-SI experiment. HIT-SI went through several upgrades: the HIT-SI3 (~2013 to ~2020) and HIT-SIU (post ~2020), both were variants on the same machine. [18] These machines demonstrated that an inductive current can be used to make and sustain a spheromak plasma structure.

Magnetic induction drive

A comparison of a dynomak and an AC transformer shows how magnetic flux is needed to drive both machines. Dynomak Versus A Transformer.png
A comparison of a dynomak and an AC transformer shows how magnetic flux is needed to drive both machines.
A comparison of the HIT-SI (left) and HIT-SI3 (right) shows different kinds and forms of flux injectors. HIT SI MACHINES.png
A comparison of the HIT-SI (left) and HIT-SI3 (right) shows different kinds and forms of flux injectors.

By definition, a dynomak is a plasma structure that is started, formed, and sustained using magnetic flux injection. Electric transformers use a similar process; a magnetic flux is created on the primary loop, and this makes an alternating current on the secondary side. Because of Faraday's law of induction, only a changing magnetic field can induce a secondary current – this is why a direct current transformer cannot exist. In a dynomak, magnetic induction is used to create a plasma current inside a plasma filled chamber. This gets the plasma moving and the system eventually relaxes into a Taylor state or spheromak. The relaxation process involves the flow of magnetic helicity (a twist in the field lines) from the injectors into the center of the machine. [19]

Supporters of this heating approach have argued that induction is 2-3 orders of magnitude more efficient than radio frequency (RF) or neutral beam heating. [19] [20] If this is true, it gives a dynomak several distinct advantages over other fusion approaches like tokamaks or magnetic mirrors. But this is an open area of research; below are some examples of how effective inductive drive is in creating plasma current inside a dynomak.

Dynomak drive effectiveness [21] [20]
Induction power
(megawatts)		Drive frequency
(kHz)		Plasma current
(kiloamps)		MachineYear
35.812HIT-SI2006
614.738HIT-SI2011

A dynomak uses injectors, which are curved arms that are attached to the main chamber. An alternating current is applied around the curve of these arms, which creates the magnetic flux that drives a dynomak. The University of Washington experimented with two and three numbers of injectors. The phase of the alternating current is offset to allow continuous injection of flux into a dynomak. Injector count effects offset angle: The drive current, and thus injectors, are offset by 90 degrees with two injectors, and by 60 degrees with three injectors.

Advantages

A spheromak plasma structure forms naturally, with no added technology needed. Supporters argue that this gives dynomaks several inherent advantages, including:

As of 2014 plasma densities reached 5x1019 m−3, temperatures of 60 eV, and maximum operation time of 1.5 ms.[ citation needed ] No confinement time results were available. At those temperatures, fusion, alpha heating, or neutron production do not occur.

Commercialization

Once the technical principals were proven in the HIT-SI machine, Dr. Jarboe challenged his students in a University of Washington class to come up with a fusion reactor based on this approach. [2] The students designed the dynomak as a reactor-level power plant that built on discoveries made from the HIT-SI and earlier machines.

Eventually, these students formed CT Fusion as a spin off from the University of Washington, to commercialize the dynomak in 2015. [23] The company has exclusive rights to 3 University of Washington patents and raised over $3.6 million from 2015 to 2019 in public and private funding. [24] The acronym CT stands for Compact Toroid, which is what spheromaks were referred to for decades. The company has received funding as part of an Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E) funding award for fusion. CT Fusion shut down in 2023. [25]

Unlike other fusion reactor designs (such as ITER), a dynomak can be, according to its engineering team, comparable in costs to a conventional coal plant. [2] A dynomak is calculated to cost a tenth of ITER and produce five times more energy at an efficiency of 40 percent. A one gigawatt dynomak would cost US$2.7 billion compared to US$2.8 billion for a coal plant. [26]

Design

Dynomak incorporates an ITER-developed cryogenic pumping system. Spheromak use an oblate spheroid instead of a tokamak configuration, with no central core, or large, complex superconducting magnets as in many tokamaks, e.g., ITER. The magnetic fields are produced by putting electric fields into the center of the plasma using superconducting tapes wrapped around the vessel, such that the plasma contains itself. [26]

A dynomak is smaller simpler and cheaper to build than a tokamak, such as ITER, while producing more power. The fusion reaction is self-sustaining as excess heat is drawn off by a molten salt blanket to power a steam turbine. [26] The prototype was about one tenth the scale of a commercial project, and can sustain plasma efficiently. Higher output would require larger scale, and higher plasma temperature. [2]

Criticisms

A dynomak relies on a copper wall to conserve and direct the magnetic flux that is injected into the machine. This wall butts up against the plasma, creating the possibility of high conduction losses through the metal. The HIT-SI coated the inside of the copper wall with an aluminum-oxide insulator to reduce these losses, but this could still be a major loss mechanism if the machine goes to fusion reactor conditions. [27]

Further, the injection of magnetic helicity into the field forces the machine to break the magnetic flux surfaces that hold and sustain the plasma structure. The breaking of these surfaces has been cited as a reason that a dynomaks' heating mechanism does not work as efficiently as predicted.

Lastly, a dynomak has a complex chamber geometry, which complicates and presents challenges for maintenance and vacuum forming.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stellarator</span> Plasma device using external magnets to confine plasma

A stellarator is a device that confines plasma using external magnets. Scientists researching magnetic confinement fusion aim to use stellarator devices as a vessel for nuclear fusion reactions. The name refers to stars as fusion also occurs in stars such as the Sun. It is one of the earliest fusion power devices, along with the z-pinch and magnetic mirror.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tokamak</span> Magnetic confinement device used to produce thermonuclear fusion power

A tokamak is a device which uses a powerful magnetic field generated by external magnets to confine plasma in the shape of an axially-symmetrical torus. The tokamak is one of several types of magnetic confinement devices being developed to produce controlled thermonuclear fusion power. The tokamak concept is currently one of the leading candidates for a practical fusion reactor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plasma stability</span> Degree to which disturbing a plasma system at equilibrium will destabilize it

In plasma physics, plasma stability concerns the stability properties of a plasma in equilibrium and its behavior under small perturbations. The stability of the system determines if the perturbations will grow, oscillate, or be damped out. It is an important consideration in topics such as nuclear fusion and astrophysical plasma.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fusion power</span> Electricity generation through nuclear fusion

Fusion power is a proposed form of power generation that would generate electricity by using heat from nuclear fusion reactions. In a fusion process, two lighter atomic nuclei combine to form a heavier nucleus, while releasing energy. Devices designed to harness this energy are known as fusion reactors. Research into fusion reactors began in the 1940s, but as of 2024, no device has reached net power, although net positive reactions have been achieved.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ITER</span> International nuclear fusion research and engineering megaproject

ITER is an international nuclear fusion research and engineering megaproject aimed at creating energy through a fusion process similar to that of the Sun. Upon completion of construction of the main reactor and first plasma, planned for late 2025, it will be the world's largest magnetic confinement plasma physics experiment and the largest experimental tokamak nuclear fusion reactor. It is being built next to the Cadarache facility in southern France. ITER will be the largest of more than 100 fusion reactors built since the 1950s, with ten times the plasma volume of any other tokamak operating today.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor</span> Former experimental tokamak at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

The Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR) was an experimental tokamak built at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) circa 1980 and entering service in 1982. TFTR was designed with the explicit goal of reaching scientific breakeven, the point where the heat being released from the fusion reactions in the plasma is equal or greater than the heating being supplied to the plasma by external devices to warm it up.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Magnetic confinement fusion</span> Approach to controlled thermonuclear fusion using magnetic fields

Magnetic confinement fusion (MCF) is an approach to generate thermonuclear fusion power that uses magnetic fields to confine fusion fuel in the form of a plasma. Magnetic confinement is one of two major branches of controlled fusion research, along with inertial confinement fusion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Field-reversed configuration</span> Magnetic confinement fusion reactor

A field-reversed configuration (FRC) is a type of plasma device studied as a means of producing nuclear fusion. It confines a plasma on closed magnetic field lines without a central penetration. In an FRC, the plasma has the form of a self-stable torus, similar to a smoke ring.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spheromak</span>

A spheromak is an arrangement of plasma formed into a toroidal shape similar to a smoke ring. The spheromak contains large internal electric currents and their associated magnetic fields arranged so the magnetohydrodynamic forces within the spheromak are nearly balanced, resulting in long-lived (microsecond) confinement times without external fields. Spheromaks belong to a type of plasma configuration referred to as the compact toroids. A spheromak can be made and sustained using magnetic flux injection, leading to a dynomak.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">DIII-D (tokamak)</span>

DIII-D is a tokamak that has been operated since the late 1980s by General Atomics (GA) in San Diego, California, for the United States Department of Energy. The DIII-D National Fusion Facility is part of the ongoing effort to achieve magnetically confined fusion. The mission of the DIII-D Research Program is to establish the scientific basis for the optimization of the tokamak approach to fusion energy production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak</span> Experimental tokamak

The Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST), internal designation HT-7U, is an experimental superconducting tokamak magnetic fusion energy reactor in Hefei, China. The Hefei Institutes of Physical Science is conducting the experiment for the Chinese Academy of Sciences. It has operated since 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">KSTAR</span> Nuclear fusion research facility in South Korea

The KSTAR is a magnetic fusion device at the Korea Institute of Fusion Energy in Daejeon, South Korea. It is intended to study aspects of magnetic fusion energy that will be pertinent to the ITER fusion project as part of that country's contribution to the ITER effort. The project was approved in 1995, but construction was delayed by the East Asian financial crisis, which weakened the South Korean economy considerably; however, the project's construction phase was completed on September 14, 2007. The first plasma was achieved in June 2008.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ASDEX Upgrade</span>

ASDEX Upgrade is a divertor tokamak at the Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Garching that went into operation in 1991. At present, it is Germany's second largest fusion experiment after stellarator Wendelstein 7-X.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WEST (formerly Tore Supra)</span>

WEST, or Tungsten Environment in Steady-state Tokamak, is a French tokamak that originally began operating as Tore Supra after the discontinuation of TFR and of Petula. The original name came from the words torus and superconductor, as Tore Supra was for a long time the only tokamak of this size with superconducting toroidal magnets, allowing the creation of a strong permanent toroidal magnetic field. After a major upgrade to install tungsten walls and a divertor, the tokamak was renamed WEST.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Helically Symmetric Experiment</span>

The Helically Symmetric Experiment, is an experimental plasma confinement device at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, with design principles that are intended to be incorporated into a fusion reactor. The HSX is a modular coil stellarator which is a toroid-shaped pressure vessel with external electromagnets which generate a magnetic field for the purpose of containing a plasma. It began operation in 1999.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taylor state</span>

In plasma physics, a Taylor state is the minimum energy state of a plasma while the plasma is conserving magnetic flux. This was first proposed by John Bryan Taylor in 1974 and he backed up this claim using data from the ZETA machine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spherical tokamak</span> Fusion power device

A spherical tokamak is a type of fusion power device based on the tokamak principle. It is notable for its very narrow profile, or aspect ratio. A traditional tokamak has a toroidal confinement area that gives it an overall shape similar to a donut, complete with a large hole in the middle. The spherical tokamak reduces the size of the hole as much as possible, resulting in a plasma shape that is almost spherical, often compared to a cored apple. The spherical tokamak is sometimes referred to as a spherical torus and often shortened to ST.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plasma-facing material</span>

In nuclear fusion power research, the plasma-facing material (PFM) is any material used to construct the plasma-facing components (PFC), those components exposed to the plasma within which nuclear fusion occurs, and particularly the material used for the lining the first wall or divertor region of the reactor vessel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Divertor</span> Magnetic confinement fusion device component

In magnetic confinement fusion, a divertor or diverted configuration is a magnetic field configuration of a tokamak or a stellarator which separates the confined plasma from the material surface of the device. The plasma particles which diffuse across the boundary of the confined region are diverted by the open, wall-intersecting magnetic field lines to wall structures which are called the divertor targets, usually remote from the confined plasma. The magnetic divertor extracts heat and ash produced by the fusion reaction, minimizes plasma contamination, and protects the surrounding walls from thermal and neutronic loads.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hybrid Illinois Device for Research and Applications</span> Toroidal magnetic fusion device

The Hybrid Illinois Device for Research and Applications (HIDRA) is a medium-sized toroidal magnetic fusion device housed in the Nuclear Radiation Laboratory and operated by the Center for Plasma-Material Interactions (CPMI) within the Department of Nuclear, Plasma and Radiological Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, United States. HIDRA had its first plasma at the end of April 2016 and started experimental campaigns by December of that year. HIDRA is the former WEGA classical stellarator that was operated at the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics in Greifswald Germany from 2001 to 2013.

References

  1. ↑ D.A. Sutherland, T.R. Jarboe et al., "The dynomak: An advanced spheromak reactor concept with imposed-dynamo current drive and next-generation nuclear power technologies", Fusion Engineering and Design , Volume 89, Issue 4, April 2014, pp. 412–425
  2. 1 2 3 4 Michelle Ma, "UW fusion reactor concept could be cheaper than coal", University of Washington , October 8, 2014
  3. ↑ Evan Ackerman, "Inside the Dynomak", IEEE Spectrum , November 26, 2014
  4. ↑ Kaptanoglu, Alan A., et al. "Advanced modeling for the HIT-SI Experiment." arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.00557 (2020).
  5. 1 2 Taylor, J. Brian. "Relaxation of toroidal plasma and generation of reverse magnetic fields." Physical Review Letters 33.19 (1974): 1139.
  6. ↑ Goldenbaum, G., J. Irby, Y. Chong, and G. Hart. "Formation of a Spheromak Plasma Configuration." Physical Review Letters 44.6 (1980): 393-96. Web.
  7. ↑ Kolb, A.C.; Dobbie, C.B.; Griem, H.R. (1 July 1959). "Field mixing and associated neutron production in a plasma". Physical Review Letters. 3 (1): 5–7.
  8. ↑ Tuszewski, M. "Field Reversed Configurations." Nuclear Fusion 28.11 (1988): 2033-092
  9. ↑ “Evidence of a hot dense plasma in a theta pinch” Green, 1960
  10. ↑ Bellan, Paul (2000). Spheromaks. Imperial College Press. ISBN 978-1-86094-141-2.
  11. ↑ Rosenbluth, M. N.; M. N. Bussac. "MHD stability of spheromak." Nuclear Fusion 19.4 (1979): 489
  12. ↑ Jarboe, T. R., Wysocki, F.J., Fernandez, J.C., Henins, I., Marklin, G.J., Physics of Fluids B 2 (1990) 1342-1346
  13. ↑ "Physics through the 1990s", National Academies Press, 1986, p. 198.
  14. ↑ Wysocki, F.J., Fernandez, J.C., Henins, I., Jarboe, T.R., Marklin, G.J., Physics Review Letters 21 (1988) 2457-2460
  15. ↑ Wood, R. D., et al. "Particle control in the sustained spheromak physics experiment." Journal of nuclear materials 290 (2001): 513-517.
  16. ↑ Sieck, P. E., et al. "First Plasma Results from the HIT-SI Spheromak." APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts. Vol. 45. 2003.
  17. ↑ Sutherland, D. A., et al. "The dynomak: An advanced fusion reactor concept with imposed-dynamo current drive and next-generation nuclear power technologies."
  18. ↑ Morgan, K. D., et al. "High-speed feedback control of an oscillating magnetic helicity injector using a graphics processing unit." Review of Scientific Instruments 92.5 (2021): 053530.
  19. 1 2 3 Fisch, Nathaniel J. "Theory of current drive in plasmas." Reviews of Modern Physics 59.1 (1987): 175
  20. 1 2 3 Jarboe, T. R., et al. "Recent results from the HIT-SI experiment." Nuclear Fusion 51.6 (2011): 063029
  21. ↑ Jarboe, T. R., et al. "Spheromak formation by steady inductive helicity injection." Physical review letters 97.11 (2006): 115003
  22. ↑ The Nuclear Fusion Shark Tank - June Call - PSS & CT Fusion. YouTube. Published online June 11, 2019. Accessed May 2, 2022
  23. ↑ Dr. Matthew Moynihan. The Nuclear Fusion Shark Tank - June Call - PSS & CT Fusion. YouTube. Published online June 11, 2019. Accessed May 2, 2022.
  24. ↑ CTFusion. Fusionenergybase.com. Published 2019. Accessed May 2, 2022. https://www.fusionenergybase.com/organization/ctfusion
  25. ↑ Stiffler, Lisa (April 5, 2023). "Energy startup CTFusion folds as co-founders land at rival Zap".
  26. 1 2 3 Szondy, David (October 12, 2014). "University of Washington fusion reactor promises "cheaper than coal" energy". newatlas.com. Retrieved October 13, 2016.
  27. ↑ Sieck, P. E., et al. "First Plasma Results from the HIT-SI Spheromak." APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts. Vol. 45. 2003
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.