Proto-Berber language

Last updated
Proto-Berber
Proto-Libyan
Reconstruction of Berber languages
Region North Africa
Reconstructed
ancestor

Proto-Berber or Proto-Libyan is the reconstructed proto-language from which the modern Berber languages descend. Proto-Berber was an Afroasiatic language, and thus its descendant Berber languages are cousins to the Egyptian language, Cushitic languages, Semitic languages, Chadic languages, and the Omotic languages. [1]

Contents

History

Map of the spread of the Afroasiatic languages; Proto-Berber is indicated by the number "6." Afro-asiatic map.png
Map of the spread of the Afroasiatic languages; Proto-Berber is indicated by the number "6."

Proto-Berber shows features that clearly distinguish it from all other branches of Afroasiatic, but modern Berber languages are relatively homogeneous. Whereas the split from the other known Afroasiatic branches was very ancient, on the order of 10,000~9,000 years BP, according to glottochronological studies, [2] Proto-Berber might be as recent as 3,000 years BP. Louali & Philippson (2003) propose, on the basis of the lexical reconstruction of livestock-herding, a Proto-Berber 1 (PB1) stage around 7,000 years BP and a Proto-Berber 2 (PB2) stage as the direct ancestor of contemporary Berber languages. [3]

In the third millennium BC, proto-Berber speakers spread across the area from Morocco to Egypt. In the last millennium BC, another Berber expansion created the Berber peoples noted in Roman records. The final spread occurred in the first millennium AD, when the Tuareg, now possessing camels, moved into the central Sahara; [4] in the past, the northern parts of the Sahara were much more habitable than they are now. [5]

The fact that there are reconstructions for all major species of domestic ruminants but none for the camel in Proto-Berber implies that its speakers bred livestock and were pastoralists. [6]

Another dating system is based on examining the differences that characterize ancient stages of Semitic and Egyptian in the third millennium BC. Many researchers [7] have estimated the differences to have taken 4,000 years to evolve, resulting in breaking this language family in six distinct groups (Semitic, Egyptian, Berber, Cushitic, Chadic and Omotic) in the eighth millennium BC. Proto-Afroasiatic is thus from the tenth millennium since it took at least 2,000 years before it reached the stage where these different branches of this language family evolved.

From that perspective, Proto-Berber was the first Berber stage to depart from Proto-Afroasiatic in the eighth millennium. It was restructured several times during the almost 10,000 years that separated it from its modern shape, which has preserved few relics. [8]

Roger Blench (2018) [9] suggests that Proto-Berber speakers had spread from the Nile River valley to North Africa 4,000–5,000 years BP due to the spread of pastoralism, and experienced intense language leveling about 2,000 years BP as the Roman Empire was expanding in North Africa. Hence, although Berber had split off from Afroasiatic several thousand years ago, Proto-Berber itself can only be reconstructed to a period as late as 200 AD. Blench (2018) notes that Berber is considerably different from other Afroasiatic branches, but modern-day Berber languages display low internal diversity. The presence of Punic borrowings in Proto-Berber points to the diversification of modern Berber languages subsequent to the fall of Carthage in 146 BC; only Guanche and Zenaga lack Punic loanwords. [9] Additionally, Latin loanwords in Proto-Berber point to the breakup of Proto-Berber between 1 and 200 AD. During this time period, Roman innovations including the ox-plough, camel, and orchard management were adopted by Berber communities along the limites, the borders of the Roman Empire. In Blench's view, this resulted in a new trading culture involving the use of a lingua franca, which became Proto-Berber. [9]

Reconstructions

Reconstructions of the ancient stages of this language are based on comparisons with other Afro-Asiatic languages in various stages and on the comparisons between the varieties of modern Berber languages [10] or with Touareg, considered by some authors like Prasse [11] to be the variety that best preserved proto-Berber.

Phonology

Some earlier attempts to derive the phonemic inventory of Proto-Berber were heavily influenced by Tuareg because of its perception of being particularly archaic. [12]

Vowels

Karl G. Prasse and Maarten Kossmann reconstruct three short vowels /a/, /i/, /u/ and four long vowels /aa/, /ii/, /uu/ and /ee/. [12] [13] Their main reflexes in modern Berber languages are shown in the following table:

Reflexes of PB vowels in modern Berber languages [14]
*PB Zenaga Tuareg /
Ghadames 		Figuig
and others
*aaӑə
*iiəə
*uuəə
*aaaaa
*iiiii
*eeiei
*uuuuu

Tuareg and Ghadames also have /o/, which seems to have evolved from /u/ by vowel harmony in Tuareg [13] and from *aʔ in Ghadames. [15]

Allati has reconstructed a Proto-Berber vocalic system made of six vowels: i, u, e, o, a. [16] Without the long vowels that are not Proto-Afroasiatic (cf. Diakonoff, 1965 : 31, 40 ; Bomhard et Kerns, 1994 : 107, among others) and that evolved in some modern Berber varieties (Toureg, Ghadames, ...), the system is preserved in the southeastern Berber varieties including Tuareg. It is equally close to the proposed Proto-Afroasiatic vocalic system (Diakonoff, 1965, 1988).

Alexander Militarev reconstructs the vowels /a/, /i/, /u/ in his proto-forms. [17]

Consonants

Kossmann reconstructs the following consonantal phonemes for Proto-Berber:

Consonant phonemes [18] [12] [15]
Type Labial Dental/Alveolar Post-al./
Palatal 		Velar Uvular Glottal
Plain Pha. Plain Lab.
Nasal m mː n̪ n̪ː
Stop t̪
d̪ 		t̪ː
d̪ː		 
d̪ˤ		 
d̪ːˤ		 c ?
ɟ ?		cː?
ɟː?		 k
g 		kː
gː		 
ɢ 		qː ʔ
 
Fricative f
β 		fː
 		 s̪
z̪ 		s̪ː
z̪ː		 
z̪ˤ		 
z̪ːˤ
Approximant j dʒː w gːʷ
Lateral l̪ l̪ː
Trill r̪ r̪ː

As in modern Berber languages, [19] most Proto-Berber consonants had a homorganic tense counterpart, with the sole exceptions of *β, *ʔ. [12]

The consonants *ɟ and *g have remained distinct in some Zenati languages: [12]

PBTam. Ghad. Riff Chen.
*ɟgɟʒʒ
*ggɟyg

Similarly, Proto-Berber *c, corresponding to k in non-Zenati varieties, became š in Zenati (but a number of irregular correspondences for this are found). [12] For example, căm "you (f. sg.)" becomes šəm. (The change also occurs in Nafusi and Siwi.)

Eastern Berber languages:

Proto-Berber *-əβ has become -i in Zenati. [20] For example, *arəβ "write" becomes ari. (This change also occurs in varieties including the Central Atlas Tamazight dialect of the Izayan, Nafusi, and Siwi.)

Ghadamès and Awjila are the only Berber languages to preserve Proto-Berber *β as β; [21] elsewhere in Berber it becomes h or disappears.

The Proto-Berber consonantal system reconstructed by Allati (cf. Allati, 2002, 2011) is based on remains from the ancient stages of this language preserved in the ancient toponymical strata, in Libyan inscriptions and in the modern Berber varieties. It had stops b, t, d, k, g; fricative s; nasal n and liquids l, r. The stops of the phonological system have evolved since the proto-Berber stage into variants from which other consonants have been progressively formed (Allati, 2002, 2011).

Grammar

Karl G. Prasse has produced a comprehensive reconstruction of Proto-Berber morphology based on Tuareg. [22] Additional work on the reconstruction of Proto-Berber morphology was done by Maarten Kossmann. [23]

Proto-Berber had no grammatical case. Its descendants developed a marked nominative that is still present in Northern Berber and Southern Berber/Tuareg. Some Berber languages lost it thereafter, recently in Eastern Berber and Western Berber (Zenaga). [24]

Independent personal pronouns

*ənakkʷ [25]

Kinship

father*ʔab(b)-

The relics of the ancient morphological segments preserved in the modern varieties, in the Libyan inscriptions and in the ancient toponymical strata show that the basis of word formation is a monosyllabic lexical unit (vc, cvc) whose vowels and consonants are part of the root. [26]

Its forms and its characteristics are similar to those of the base of word formation postulated for proto-Afroasiatic. [27] The composition and the reduplication/doubling process whose traces are preserved in all the Afroasiatic branches, including Semitic where they are fossilized in the quadrilaterals and quintiliterals, constitute the type of word formation at that stage of Berber. [28]

These remains also show that agglutination is the Proto-Berber mode of the grammatical adjunction of morphemes whose placement was not fixed in relation to the elements that they determine (cf. Allati, 2002, 2011b/c, 2012, 2013, 2014). The relations between the predicate of existence, the core of the utterance in the proto-Berber stage, and its determinants [29] ordered around it without a pre-established order, are indicated with affixes (cf. idem).

The Proto-Berber relics preserved at the lexico-semantic and syntactic levels show that the proto-Berber syntactic construction is of the ergative type (cf. idem). The proto-Berber statement core is a predicate of existence, a lexical base [30] which posits the existence of a fact, of a situation...i.e. it expresses a state, a quality (cf. Allati, 2002, 2011b/c, 2013 below) having the value of a stative (cf. idem et Allati, 2008). It is not oriented in relation to its determinants (agentive subject, object...) whose syntactic functions are insured by casual elements including the casual affix (ergative) that indicates, as needed, the agent or the subject. Similar elements attested in Cushitic, Chadic and Omotic, and remains preserved in Semitic drove Diakonoff to postulate the same type of syntactic construction for proto-Semitic and proto-Afroasiatic (cf. Diakonoff, 1988, 101 ; cf. equally Allati, 2008, 2011a, 2012). Many elements equally show that proto-Berber did not have the noun-verb contrast, the rection contrasts, diathesis and person (cf. idem).

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Afroasiatic languages</span> Large language family of Africa and West Asia

The Afroasiatic languages, also known as Hamito-Semitic or Semito-Hamitic, are a language family of about 400 languages spoken predominantly in West Asia, North Africa, the Horn of Africa, and parts of the Sahara and Sahel. Over 500 million people are native speakers of an Afroasiatic language, constituting the fourth-largest language family after Indo-European, Sino-Tibetan, and Niger–Congo. Most linguists divide the family into six branches: Berber, Chadic, Cushitic, Egyptian, Semitic, and Omotic. The vast majority of Afroasiatic languages are considered indigenous to the African continent, including all those not belonging to the Semitic branch.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Berber languages</span> Family of languages and dialects indigenous to North Africa

The Berber languages, also known as the Amazigh languages or Tamazight, are a branch of the Afroasiatic language family. They comprise a group of closely related but mostly mutually unintelligible languages spoken by Berber communities, who are indigenous to North Africa. The languages are primarily spoken and not typically written. Historically, they have been written with the ancient Libyco-Berber script, which now exists in the form of Tifinagh. Today, they may also be written in the Berber Latin alphabet or the Arabic script, with Latin being the most pervasive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chadic languages</span> Branch of the Afroasiatic languages

The Chadic languages form a branch of the Afroasiatic language family. They are spoken in parts of the Sahel. They include 196 languages spoken across northern Nigeria, southern Niger, southern Chad, and northern Cameroon. By far the most widely spoken Chadic language is Hausa, a lingua franca of much of inland Eastern West Africa, particularly Niger and the northern half of Nigeria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eastern Berber languages</span> Group of Berber languages spoken in Libya and Egypt

The Eastern Berber languages are a group of Berber languages spoken in Libya and Egypt. They include Awjila, Sokna and Fezzan (El-Fogaha), Siwi and Ghadamès, though it is not clear that they form a valid genealogical group.

Zenaga is a Berber language on the verge of extinction currently spoken in Mauritania and northern Senegal by a few hundred people. Zenaga Berber is spoken as a mother tongue from the town of Mederdra in southwestern Mauritania to the Atlantic coast and in northern Senegal. The language is recognized by the Mauritanian government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tuareg languages</span> Group of closely related Berber languages and dialects

The Tuareg languages constitute a group of closely related Berber languages and dialects. They are spoken by the Tuareg Berbers in large parts of Mali, Niger, Algeria, Libya and Burkina Faso, with a few speakers, the Kinnin, in Chad.

The Zenati languages are a branch of the Northern Berber language family of North Africa. They were named after the medieval Zenata Berber tribal confederation. They were first proposed in the works of French linguist Edmond Destaing (1915) (1920–23). Zenata dialects are distributed across the central Berber world (Maghreb), from northeastern Morocco to just west of Algiers, and the northern Sahara, from southwestern Algeria around Bechar to Zuwara in Libya. The most widely spoken Zenati languages are Tmazight of the Rif in northern Morocco and Tashawit Berber in northeastern Algeria, each of which have over 3 million speakers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tarifit</span> Zenati Berber language of northern Morocco

Tarifit Berber, also known as Riffian or locally as Tamazight is a Zenati Berber language spoken in the Rif region in northern Morocco. It is spoken natively by some 1,271,000 Rifians primarily in the Rif provinces of Al Hoceima, Nador and Driouch.

Proto-Afroasiatic (PAA), also known as Proto-Hamito-Semitic, Proto-Semito-Hamitic, and Proto-Afrasian, is the reconstructed proto-language from which all modern Afroasiatic languages are descended. Though estimations vary widely, it is believed by scholars to have been spoken as a single language around 12,000 to 18,000 years ago, that is, between 16,000 and 10,000 BC. Although no consensus exists as to the location of the Afroasiatic homeland, the putative homeland of Proto-Afroasiatic speakers, the majority of scholars agree that it was located within a region of Northeast Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Central Atlas Tamazight</span> Berber language of central Morocco

Central Atlas Tamazight or Atlasic is a Berber language of the Afroasiatic language family spoken by 3.1 million speakers.

Ghadamès also called Ghadamsi or Ghadamsian is a Berber language that is spoken in, and named after, the oasis town of Ghadames in Nalut District, western Libya.

Nafusi is a Berber language spoken in the Nafusa Mountains, a large area in northwestern Libya. Its primary speakers are the Ibadi communities around Jadu, Nalut and Yafran.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Berber orthography</span> Writing systems for the Berber languages

Berber orthography is the writing system(s) used to transcribe the Berber languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">South Oran and Figuig Berber</span> Cluster of the Zenati languages

South Oran Berber, or Tachelhit, is a cluster of the Zenati languages, which belong to the Berber branch of the Afroasiatic family. It is spoken in a number of oases of southwestern Algeria and across the border in Morocco.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gurara language</span> Berber language of Algeria

Gurara (Gourara) is a Zenati Berber language spoken in the Gourara (Tigurarin) region, an archipelago of oases surrounding the town of Timimoun in southwestern Algeria. Ethnologue gives it the generic name Taznatit ("Zenati"), along with Tuwat spoken to its south; however, Blench (2006) classifies Gurara as a dialect of Mzab–Wargla and Tuwat as a dialect of the Riff languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zuwara Berber</span> Berber language dialect

Zuwara Berber or Twillult language (also: Zuara, Zwara, is a Berber dialect, one of the Berber Zenati languages. It is spoken in Zuwara city, located on the coast of western Tripolitania in northwestern Libya.

Ait Seghrouchen Berber, or Seghroucheni (Seghrusheni), is a Zenati Berber language of the Eastern Middle Atlas Berber cluster. It is spoken by the Ait Seghrouchen tribe inhabiting east-central Morocco.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of early Tunisia</span>

Human habitation in the North African region began over one million years ago. Remains of Homo erectus during the Middle Pleistocene period, has been found in North Africa. The Berbers, who generally antedate by many millennia the Phoenicians and the establishment of Carthage, are understood to have arisen out of social events shaped by the confluence of several earlier peoples, i.e., the Capsian culture, events which eventually constituted their ethnogenesis. Thereafter Berbers lived as an independent people in North Africa, including the Tunisian region.

The Western Berber languages are a branch of the Berber languages. They comprise two languages:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Numidian language</span> Language spoken in ancient North Africa

Numidian was a language spoken in ancient Numidia. The script in which it was written, the Libyco-Berber alphabet, has been almost fully deciphered and most characters have known values. Despite this, the language has barely been transcribed and only a few words are known. Libyco-Berber inscriptions are attested from the 3rd century BC to the 3rd century AD. The language is scarcely attested and can be confidently identified only as belonging to the Afroasiatic family, although it was most likely part of the Berber languages, spoken at the start of the breakup of the Proto-Berber language.

References

  1. ↑ Allati (2002 :3)
  2. ↑ Militarev, A. (1984), "Sovremennoe sravnitel'no-istoricheskoe afrazijskoe jazykoznanie: chto ono mozhet dat' istoricheskoj nauke?", Lingvisticheskaja rekonstrukcija i drevnejshaja istorija Vostoka, vol. 3, Moscow, pp. 3–26, 44–50{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  3. ↑ Louali & Philippson 2003, "Les Protoméditerranéens Capsiens sont-ils des protoberbères ? Interrogations de linguiste.", GALF (Groupement des Anthropologues de Langue Française), Marrakech, 22–25 septembre 2003.
  4. ↑ Heine 2000, p. 292.
  5. ↑ Heath 2005, pp. 4–5.
  6. ↑ Blench 2006, p. 81.
  7. ↑ Bomhard, A.R & Kerns, J.C., 1994, The Nostratic Macrofamily. A study in Distant Linguistic Relationship, Berlin, New York, Mouton)
  8. ↑ Allati, A. 2002. Diachronie tamazight ou berbère, Tanger, Publications de l'Université Abdelmalek Essaâdi; 2011c. "De l'ergativité dans le berbère moderne" in Studi Africanistici, Quaderna di Studi berberi e Libico-berberi, I, Napoli, 13–25. 2013. La réorganisation de l'ergativité proto-berbère : de l'état à l'état/procès, in Sounds and Words through the Ages: Afroasiatic Studies from Turin, ed. by Mengozzi, A et Tausco, M., Alessandria, Edizioni dell'Orsa, 177–190.
  9. 1 2 3 Blench, Roger. 2018. Reconciling archaeological and linguistic evidence for Berber prehistory.
  10. ↑ Galand, L. 1988, "Le berbère" in Les langues dans le monde ancien et moderne, III, les langues chamito-sémitiques, ed. by Jean Pierrot & David Cohen, Paris, éditions CNRS, 207–242.
  11. ↑ Prasse, Karl-G. 1973–74. Manuel de grammaire touarègue (tahaggart). Copenhague: Akademisk forlag
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Kossmann (1999)
  13. 1 2 K.-G. Prasse (1990), New Light on the Origin of the Tuareg Vowels E and O, in: H. G. Mukarovsky (ed), Proceedings of the Fifth International Hamito-Semitic Congress, Vienna, I 163–170. In earlier publications, Prasse had argued that /e/ and /o/ did not go back to Proto-Berber.
  14. ↑ Kossmann (2001a)
  15. 1 2 Kossmann (2001b)
  16. ↑ Allati, 2002, 2011, Histoire du berbère, I. Phonologie, Tanger, PUAEFL.
  17. ↑ Berber etymology
  18. ↑ Kossmann (2020)
  19. ↑ Kossmann, M.G.; Stroomer, H.J.: "Berber Phonology", in Phonologies of Asia and Africa, 461 – 475 (1997)
  20. ↑ See also Maarten Kossmann, "Les verbes à i finale en zénète Archived 2011-07-18 at the Wayback Machine ", Etudes et Documents Berbères 13, 1995, pp. 99–104.
  21. ↑ Kossmann 1999:61.
  22. ↑ Prasse (1972–1974)
  23. ↑ See Publications of Maarten Kossmann
  24. ↑ König 2008, p. 288.
  25. ↑ Dolgopolsky, Aron (1999). From Proto-Semitic to Hebrew. Milan: Centro Studi Camito-Semitici di Milano. p. 11.
  26. ↑ Allati,A. 2002, 2011b. "Sur les reconstructions berbères et afro-asiatiques", in Parcours berbères, Mélanges offerts à P. Galand et L. Galand, ed. by Amina Mettouchi, Köln, Köppe, 65–74.
    2011c. "De l'ergativité dans le berbère moderne", in Studi Africanistici, Quaderna di Studi berberi e Libico-berberi, I, Napoli, 13–25.
    2012. "From proto-Berber to proto-Afroasiatic", in Burning Issues in Afro-Asiatic Linguistics, edited by Ghil'ad Zuckermann, pp. 62–74.
    2013. La réorganisation de l'ergativité proto-berbère : de l'état à l'état / procès, in Sounds and Words through the Ages: Afroasiatic Studies from Turin, ed. by Mengozzi, A et Tausco, M., Alessandria, Edizioni dell'Orsa, 177–190.
  27. ↑ Diakonoff, I. M. 1988. Afrasian languages. Moscou: Nauka, 42–56.
  28. ↑ Allati, 2008. "Proto-berbère et proto-afro-asiatique : l'aspect", in: Semito-Hamitic (Afroasiatic) Festschrift for A.B. Dolgopolsky and H. Jungraithmayr, ed. by Gábor Takács, Berlin, Dietrich Reimer, 19–26. 2009. "Sur le classement du lexique berbère", in Etudes berbères IV, Essais lexicologiques et lexicographiques et autres articles. ed. by Rainer Vossen, Dymitr Ibriszimow, and Harry Stroomer, 9–24. Köln : Köppe, 9–24. 2015. La dérivation dans la morphologie berbère, forthcoming in Mélanges offerts à M. Peyron.
  29. ↑ Including its privileged determinant which is a patient not an agent.
  30. ↑ That has the role of the verb and the noun in systems where the noun-verb contrast exists.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.