Satan's Harvest Home

Last updated

Satan's Harvest Home
AuthorAnonymous
LanguageEnglish
Subject18th century British society and morality
PublisherPublished for the editor
Publication date
1749
Publication placeEngland
Media type Pamphlet
Pages62

Satan's Harvest Home is a pamphlet published anonymously in 1749 in London, Great Britain. [1] It describes and denounces what it deems the moral laxity and perversion of contemporary society, especially with reference to effeminacy, sodomy, and prostitution. The pamphlet incorporates some older material; this attempts to diagnose the cause of a perceived increase in the prevalence of sodomy among gentlemen. It specifies a continental European origin for both male effeminacy and same-sex relations between females. The pamphlet also features a poem, "Petit Maître", denouncing male habits of feminine dress.

Contents

Contemporary scholars have found in the pamphlet evidence of several Early Modern British trends: the equation of effeminacy with homosexuality; the use of Sappho as a symbol for lesbianism at a time when public awareness of lesbian relationships was increasing; and an equation of Roman Catholic Italy and France with moral degeneracy.

Outline

William Hogarth's Visit to the Quack Doctor, from the 1743-45 Marriage a-la-mode series, shows a fashionably-dressed young gentleman and a prostitute - both targets of opprobrium in Satan's Harvest Home Marriage A-la-Mode 3, The Inspection - William Hogarth.jpg
William Hogarth's Visit to the Quack Doctor, from the 1743–45 Marriage à-la-mode series, shows a fashionably-dressed young gentleman and a prostitute – both targets of opprobrium in Satan's Harvest Home

The pamphlet's full title is Satan's Harvest Home: or the Present State of Whorecraft, Adultery, Fornication, Procuring, Pimping, Sodomy, And the Game of Flatts, (Illustrated by an Authentick and Entertaining Story) And other Satanic Works, daily propagated in this good Protestant Kingdom. [2] It was printed "for the editor" – i.e. at the expense of the person who compiled it – and it was available for sale at locations across London, from several sellers in York, and in Bath.

Some of the material in the pamphlet appears to be either a straight reprint or plagiarism of older material, including from a 1734 text, Pretty Doings in a Protestant Nation, by the pseudonymous Father Poussin. [3] [4] Part of the same section also seems to have appeared in William Walsh's 1691 A Dialogue Concerning Women. [5] Another reused source is a c.1731 (1720 in some sources [6] ) pamphlet, Plain Reasons for the Growth of Sodomy in England. [7] [8]

"Reasons for the Growth of Sodomy"

In a section apparently reprinted from earlier publications, [7] [8] the pamphlet discerns "Reasons for the Growth of Sodomy" in a number of aspects of British culture. It claims that, in past ages, British middle-class gentlemen had led moral, industrious lives, serving King, country, and family. This era, the pamphlet claims, was now past and lost; the constitution of the gentleman has deteriorated. [9] Contemporary infants, it says, faced grim prospects, being pampered in nurseries by mothers who dominated their weak fathers. [10] Such children, the pamphlet argued, could not help but to grow up effete and were "scarcely worth raising". Some of the blame for this, the pamphlet claims, lay with the increasing popularity of raising children at home, and having them educated by women, rather than sending them to school or to be apprenticed. Lacking the boisterous companionship of other boys they could not acquire manly traits; [11] governed by women, they never learned to dominate women themselves, which, the pamphlet claimed, was requisite to please a wife. [12]

Male effeminacy and sodomy

One chapter of the pamphlet describes the physiognomy of the "sodomitical type", [13] claiming that gentle, soft, and delicate men are predisposed toward sodomy. [14] The next criticizes the feminine dress and hairstyling of young men whom it describes as "those Gentlemen who call themselves pretty Fellows". It characterizes their appearance, in which men styled their hair and dressed in a manner similar to their footmen, as history's most preposterous. (In contemporary Britain fears about the consequences of homosexual relationships often centred on their perceived tendency to ignore (and thus weaken) class boundaries: an effeminate gentleman who dressed like his footman, a servant, embodied this class transgression in a threatening way. [15] ) The habit of wearing makeup, the pamphlet says, was "as much in Vogue among our Gentlemen, as with the Ladies in France." [13] Italian opera, too, is criticized for its attributed tendency to feminize men. [16]

The same chapter describes same-sex kissing, particularly between men, as the most hateful product of effeminacy. It claims the phenomenon originated in Italy and France, in the latter of which it says even nuns acted lasciviously together, and decries it as an "Unmanly, Unnatural Usage... the first Inlet to the detestable Sin of Sodomy". [13] The fashion for male public kissing, the author claims, allowed "catamites" to approach men openly in the streets.

Sodomy itself, the pamphlet says, was widespread and becoming more so, and the numerous prosecutions represented likely just a fraction of the total incidences:[ spelling? ] "We have but too much reason to fear, that there are Numbers yet undiscover'd, and that this abominable Practice gets Ground ev'ry Day." [2] [13]

Plate Six of Hogarth's 1731 A Harlot's Progress: vices underway at the funeral of a prostitute Hogarth-Harlot-6.png
Plate Six of Hogarth's 1731 A Harlot's Progress : vices underway at the funeral of a prostitute

Female homosexual activity

Same-sex activity between women was also targeted. The pamphlet appears to have plagiarized the "Father Poussin" text to blame Sappho for devising the "Game of Flats", a "new sort of Sin", which has been interpreted to refer to sexual contact between women (i.e. tribadism, [17] [18] a form of "flat" contact, without the presence of protuberant male genitalia). [19] This activity, the book claims, is popular both "in Turkey" and "at Twickenham". [13] [20]

Prostitution

The pamphlet claims the streets of London were astonishingly full of prostitutes, male and female, to the extent that whole districts – such as Drury Lane, which purportedly housed 107 brothels in the early 18th century – were exclusively inhabited by prostitutes: [21]

...quite up to St. Thomas's-street (some few honest shopkeepers excepted) is a Corporation of Whores, Coiners, Highwaymen, Gamesters, Pick-pockets, and House-breakers, who like Bats and Owls skulk in obscure Holes and Geneva shops by Day-Light, but wander in the Night in search of Opportunities wherein to exercise their Villany. (Page 25) [13]

Though the pamphlet describes the pitiable and desperate conditions in which prostitutes lived, and the corruption of the police supposed to patrol them, it also accuses prostitutes of 'Inhumanity' and deems them devilish and monstrous. [13] The vices of the prostitute are presented as those endemic among all women. [13] [22]

"Petit Maître"

The pamphlet concludes with a poem, "Petit Maître", criticizing a man with an effeminate appearance. The style has been characterized as satirical. [23] The final verse not only exhorts men to dress in a masculine style, but suggests that the effeminate are in any case less than manly:

If thou art a Man, forbear
Thus, this motly Garb to wear;
Do not Reason thus displace,
Do not Man-hood thus disgrace;
But thy Sex by Dress impart,
And appear like what thou art:
Like what thou art, said I, pray pardon me;
I mean, appear like what thou ought'st to be. [13]

Reception

Some modern analyses have characterized the pamphlet as a "best-seller" in its own time. [24] Its familiarity today may also derive from its inclusion in several 19th century bibliographies: it was listed in W. T. Lowndes's pioneering Bibliographer's Manual of English Literature, published 1834, generally regarded as the first such systematic literary bibliography. [25] The pamphlet was also the subject of an extensive entry in the 1877 Index Librorum Prohibitorum of the pseudonymous Pisanus Fraxi (really Henry Spencer Ashbee), an encyclopedia of erotic literature. The Index reproduced substantial portions of the original text, introducing the work as a "rare volume, its object being strictly moral." [26]

Modern scholars have attended to the pamphlet as an example of contemporary attitudes toward homophobia, effeminacy, prostitution, and even international relations. David Robinson characterizes the pamphlet's contents as "blatant, vituperative homophobia", [27] and the Encyclopedia of Homosexuality identifies it as an effort to incite anti-homosexual sentiment. [28] Christopher Hobson presents pamphlets of this type as the handmaid of eighteenth-century English judicial crackdowns against homosexual offenders; as a mechanism whereby homosexual behaviour was kept indefensible, and potential perpetrators kept terrified. [29]

Ian McCormick diagnoses the pamphlet as representing a gradual change in European discourse on the character of the sodomite: previous publications had discussed sexual deviance (conceived in contemporary terms) as a general evil; with Satan's Harvest Home a new attention was brought to the individual character of persons who committed sodomy. [30] He argues that 'before the seventeenth century, sodomy was not even precisely differentiated from its demonic associations with werewolves, heretics, sorcerers, and the like. Increasingly, however, it came to be linked with pride, excess of diet, idleness, and contempt of the poor.' [31] The pamphlet's equation of effeminacy with homosexuality is identified by Michael Kimmel as distinctive for the period. [32]

Other scholars have identified the text's tone as satirical and mildly obscene, locating it among a movement of pamphlets influenced by a counter-trend promoting greater sympathy for prostitution. [33] Linda Dowling interprets the pamphlet less a broadside against sodomites, and more as evidence of a strand in rhetoric that valorized Britain's martial past and saw lack of respect for it as a precondition for vice. [10] Ian Bell considers the causality of this relationship between moral collapse and vice, characterizing the book as part of strand that saw vice as a product, not a cause, of a fundamental collapse in morality in Augustan London. [34]

Many scholars have considered the pamphlet as evidence for an association, in eighteenth-century thought, between same-sex vice and the influence of continental (and specifically Roman Catholic) European mores, particularly of those from France and Italy. George Haggerty sees the pamphlet as typical of a trend in eighteenth century British discourse that blamed Italy and France for exporting sodomy to Britain; [35] Valerie Traub notes its references to "foreign contagion... the criminal amorousness endemic to France and Italy.". [36]

George Rousseau, similarly, cites the pamphlet as part of a body of 1740s "sodomy" literature so wide-ranging as to suggest that the term's meaning might have been mutable, broad, and vague. He argues specifically that, in the 1740s, the term had a strong connotation of an imported vice; it was often used in the 1740s to connote suspicion against foreigners. [14] The pamphlet's text, on page 50, includes the strident claim "Damn'd Fashion! Imported from Italy amid'st a Train of other unnatural Vices. Have we not Sins enough of our own, but we must eke 'em out with those of Foreign Nations, to fill up the Cup of our Abominations, and make us yet more ripe for Divine Vengeance?" [13] The plausibility of the theory that "sodomy", however understood, was particularly prevalent in Italy is difficult to assess, though Trevor Dean notes that, earlier, seventeenth-century Italy had undergone increasingly vigorous efforts to monitor and regulate sexual activity. [37]

Historians of lesbianism have cited the work as early evidence of public awareness that a lesbian culture existed within eighteenth century England, [20] and locate its references to Sappho as early indicators that that term was coming into general usage to describe lesbians. [38]

Publishing history

Garland of New York produced a facsimile edition of the pamphlet in 1985. [39] An original edition is held in the British Library. [40]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Buggery Act 1533</span> English legislation criminalizing sodomy

The Buggery Act 1533, formally An Acte for the punishment of the vice of Buggerie, was an Act of the Parliament of England that was passed during the reign of Henry VIII.

Societal attitudes towards same-sex relationships have varied over time and place. Attitudes to male homosexuality have varied from requiring males to engage in same-sex relationships to casual integration, through acceptance, to seeing the practice as a minor sin, repressing it through law enforcement and judicial mechanisms, and to proscribing it under penalty of death. In addition, it has varied as to whether any negative attitudes towards men who have sex with men have extended to all participants, as has been common in Abrahamic religions, or only to passive (penetrated) participants, as was common in Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome. Female homosexuality has historically been given less acknowledgment, explicit acceptance, and opposition.

Molly house or molly-house was a term used in 18th- and 19th-century Britain for a meeting place for homosexual men and gender-nonconforming people. The meeting places were generally taverns, public houses, coffeehouses or even private rooms where patrons could either socialise or meet possible sexual partners.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timeline of LGBT history</span> Notable events in LGBT history

The following is the timeline of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) history.

Christian leaders have written about male homosexual activities since the first decades of Christianity; female homosexual behavior was almost entirely ignored. Throughout the majority of Christian history, most Christian theologians and denominations have considered homosexual behavior as immoral or sinful.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Terminology of homosexuality</span>

Terms used to describe homosexuality have gone through many changes since the emergence of the first terms in the mid-19th century. In English, some terms in widespread use have been sodomite, Achillean, Sapphic, Uranian, homophile, lesbian, gay, effeminate, queer, homoaffective, and same-gender attracted. Some of these words are specific to women, some to men, and some can be used of either. Gay people may also be identified under the umbrella term LGBT.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Macaroni (fashion)</span> Outlandishly fashionable man

A macaroni was a pejorative term used to describe a fashionable fellow of 18th-century Britain. Stereotypically, men in the macaroni subculture dressed, spoke, and behaved in an unusually epicene and androgynous manner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of lesbianism</span>

Lesbianism is the sexual and romantic desire between women. There are historically fewer mentions of lesbianism than male homosexuality, due to many historical writings and records focusing primarily on men.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rictor Norton</span> American historian

Rictor Norton is an American writer on literary and cultural history, particularly queer history. He is based in London, England.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Society for the Reformation of Manners</span> Conservative group in London, England during the 17th century

The Society for the Reformation of Manners was founded in the Tower Hamlets area of London in 1691. Its aims were the suppression of profanity, immorality, and other lewd activities in general, and of brothels and prostitution in particular. The society flourished until the 1730s and was briefly revived during 1757.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in the 19th century</span>

This is a list of important events relating to the LGBT community from 1801 to 1900. The earliest published studies of lesbian activity were written in the early 19th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sodomy</span> Anal or oral sex with people, any sex with an animal, non-procreative sex

Sodomy, also called buggery in British English, generally refers to either anal sex between people, or any sexual activity between a human and another animal (bestiality). It may also mean any non-procreative sexual activity. Originally the term sodomy, which is derived from the story of Sodom and Gomorrah in the Book of Genesis, was commonly restricted to homosexual anal sex. Sodomy laws in many countries criminalized the behavior. In the Western world, many of these laws have been overturned or are routinely not enforced. A person who practices sodomy is sometimes referred to as a sodomite, a pejorative term.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boulton and Park</span> British entertainers and cross-dressers

Thomas Ernest Boulton and Frederick William Park were Victorian cross-dressers. Both were homosexual men from upper-middle-class families, both enjoyed wearing women's clothes and both enjoyed taking part in theatrical performances—playing the women's roles when they did so. It is possible that they asked for money for sex, although there is some dispute over this. In the late 1860s they were joined on a theatrical tour by Lord Arthur Clinton, the Liberal Party Member of Parliament for Newark. Also homosexual, he and Boulton entered into a relationship; Boulton called himself Clinton's wife, and had cards printed showing his name as Lady Arthur Clinton.

This is a timeline of notable events in the history of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community in the United Kingdom. There is evidence that LGBT activity in the United Kingdom existed as far back as the days of Celtic Britain.

The study of homosexuality in Mexico can be divided into three separate periods, coinciding with the three main periods of Mexican history: pre-Columbian, colonial, and post-independence, in spite of the fact that the rejection of homosexuality forms a connecting thread that crosses the three periods.

In medieval Europe, attitudes toward homosexuality varied from region to region, determined by religious culture; the Catholic Church, which dominated the religious landscape, considered, and still considers, sodomy as a mortal sin and a "crime against nature". By the 11th century, "sodomy" was increasingly viewed as a serious moral crime and punishable by mutilation or death. Medieval records reflect this growing concern. The emergence of heretical groups, such as the Cathars and Waldensians, witnesses a rise in allegations of unnatural sexual conduct against such heretics as part of the war against heresy in Christendom. Accusations of sodomy and "unnatural acts" were levelled against the Order of the Knights Templar in 1307 as part of Philip IV of France's attempt to suppress the order. These allegations have been dismissed by some scholars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Utrecht sodomy trials</span>

The Utrecht sodomy trials were a large-scale persecution of homosexuals that took place in the Dutch Republic, starting in the city of Utrecht in 1730. Over the following year, the persecution of "sodomites" spread to the rest of the nation, leading to some 250 to 300 trials, often ending in a death sentence, which was often carried out by strangling.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Jones (figure skater)</span> 18th century British military officer, LGBTQ author, populariser of figure skater and fireworks

Robert Jones was an officer in the Royal Artillery of the British Army. He is best known for writing and self-publishing The Art of Skating, the first book about figure skating, in 1772, which helped popularize the sport in Great Britain. He also authored a book about and popularising fireworks. The Art of Skating has been called "a milestone in the history of figure skating"; it described basic techniques of skating, which was a recreational activity at the time, before the development of figure skating as a sport in the late 1800s. Jones was the first to recognise skating as an art form and advocated for the inclusion of women in the activity, as long as it was done for leisure.

The Christian tradition has generally proscribed any and all noncoital genital activities, whether engaged in by couples or individuals, regardless of whether they were of the same or different sex. The position of the Roman Catholic Church with regards to homosexuality developed from the writings of Paul the Apostle and the teachings of the Church Fathers. These were in stark contrast to contemporary Greek and Roman attitudes towards same-sex relations which were more relaxed.

References

  1. "Satan's Harvest Home: or the Present State of Whorecraft ... collected from the memoirs of an intimate comrade of the Hon. Jack S**n**r ... To which is added, The Petit Maitre, a poem by a Lady of Distinction". books.google.com. Editor. 19 November 2023. Retrieved 5 August 2023.
  2. 1 2 Hallam, Paul (13 October 1996). The Book of Sodom. Verso. p. 121; 127–128. ISBN   1-85984-042-6.
  3. Grundy, Isobel (1999). Lady Mary Wortley Montagu. Oxford University Press. p. 346. ISBN   0-19-811289-0.
  4. Norton, Rictor (30 March 2003). "Pretty Doings in a Protestant Nation, 1734". Homosexuality in Eighteenth-Century England: A Sourcebook.
  5. Reynolds, Margaret (30 June 2002). The Sappho companion. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 127. ISBN   0-312-29510-3.
  6. Turley, Hans (2001). Rum, sodomy, and the lash. NYU Press. p. 75. ISBN   0-8147-8224-8.
  7. 1 2 Rictor Norton, ed. (4 March 2007) [2000]. "Reasons for the Growth of Sodomy, 1731". Homosexuality in Eighteenth-Century England: A Sourcebook.
  8. 1 2 Haggerty, George (2000). "Heteromachia". GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies. 6 (3): 435–450. doi:10.1215/10642684-6-3-435. S2CID   246065327.
  9. Edelman, Lee (1994). Homographesis. Routledge. p. 122. ISBN   0-415-90259-2.
  10. 1 2 Dowling, Linda (November 1996). Hellenism and homosexuality in Victorian Oxford. Cornell University Press. p. 10. ISBN   0-8014-8170-8.
  11. Greenberg, David F. (15 August 1990). The construction of homosexuality. University of Chicago Press. p. 389. ISBN   0-226-30628-3.
  12. Lancaster, Roger; Leonardo, Micaela Di (1997). The gender/sexuality reader. Routledge. p. 186. ISBN   0-415-91005-6.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Anonymous (1749). Satan's Harvest Home. London.
  14. 1 2 Rousseau, George Sebastian (1991). Perilous enlightenment. Manchester University Press. pp. 19, 22. ISBN   0-7190-3301-2.
  15. Dynes, Wayne R.; Donaldson, Stephen (1 November 1992). History of Homosexuality in Europe and America. Taylor & Francis. p. 308. ISBN   0-8153-0550-8.
  16. Crompton, Louis (31 October 2006). Homosexuality and Civilization. Harvard University Press. p. 460. ISBN   0-674-02233-5.
  17. Bennett, Judith M.; Froide, Amy M (1999). Singlewomen in the European past, 1250–1800. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 314. ISBN   0-8122-1668-7.
  18. Kittredge, Katharine (2003). Lewd and notorious. University of Michigan Press. p. 348. ISBN   0-472-08906-4.
  19. Andreadis, Harriette (2001). Sappho in early modern England. University of Chicago Press. p. 10. ISBN   0-226-02008-8.[ permanent dead link ]
  20. 1 2 Hitchcock, Tim (1997). English sexualities, 1700–1800. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 84. ISBN   0-312-16574-9.[ permanent dead link ]
  21. Linnane, Fergus (28 September 2007). London: the wicked city. Robson. p. 460. ISBN   978-1-86105-990-1.
  22. Carter, Sophie (2004). Purchasing Power: representing prostitution in eighteenth-century English popular print culture. Ashgate. p. 22. ISBN   0-7546-0629-5.
  23. Griffin, Robert John (2003). The faces of anonymity. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 92. ISBN   0-312-29530-8.
  24. Crawford, Katherine (2007). European sexualities, 1400–1800. Cambridge University Press. p. 213. ISBN   978-0-521-83958-7.
  25. Lowndes, William Thomas (1864). The bibliographer's manual of English literature (2nd ed.). Henry G. Bohn. p.  2913.
  26. Pisanus Fraxi (Henry Spencer Ashbee (1877). Index Librorum Prohibitorum: being Notes Bio- Biblio- Icono- graphical and Critical, on Curious and Uncommon Books. London: Private. p. 357.
  27. Robinson, David M (July 2006). Closeted writing and lesbian and gay literature. Ashgate. p. 88. ISBN   0-7546-5550-4.
  28. Warren Dynes, ed. (1990). Encyclopedia of homosexuality. Garland. p. 255. ISBN   0-8240-6544-1.
  29. Hobson, Christopher Z. (2000). Blake and homosexuality . Palgrave Macmillan. p.  7. ISBN   0-312-23451-1.
  30. McCormick, Ian (2000). Sexual outcasts, 1750–1850: Sodomy. Taylor & Francis. p. 5. ISBN   0-415-20148-9.
  31. Ian McCormick, Secret Sexualities: A Sourcebook. (Routledge 1997), p. 6.
  32. Kimmel, Michael S. (March 2005). The History of Men. SUNY Press. p. 193. ISBN   0-7914-6340-0.
  33. Mudge, Bradford Keyes (2000). The Whore's Story. Oxford University Press. p. 298. ISBN   0-19-513505-9.
  34. Bell, Ian A. (1991). Literature and crime in Augustan England . Routledge. p. 268. ISBN   0-415-02231-2.
  35. Haggerty, George E. (24 July 2006). Queer Gothic. University of Illinois Press. p. 66. ISBN   0-252-07353-3.
  36. Traub, Valerie (2002). The Renaissance of Lesbianism in Early Modern England. Cambridge University Press. p. 315. ISBN   0-521-44885-9.
  37. Dean, Trevor (1994). Crime, society and the law in Renaissance Italy. Cambridge University Press. p.  75. ISBN   0-521-41102-5.
  38. Backscheider, Paula R. (October 2005). Eighteenth-century women poets and their poetry. JHU Press. p. 310. ISBN   0-8018-8169-2.
  39. Haggerty, George E. (2000). Gay histories and cultures. Taylor and Francis. p. 335. ISBN   0-8153-1880-4.
  40. "British Library integrated catalogue record for Satan's Harvest Home". British Library . Retrieved 23 June 2009.