Washington Initiative 522 (2012)

Last updated

Washington Initiative 522 (I-522) "concerns labeling of genetically-engineered foods" and was a 2012 initiative to the Washington State Legislature. [1] As certified by the Washington Secretary of State, it achieved enough signatures to be forwarded to the legislature for consideration during the 2013 session. [2] The legislature did not vote on the initiative, so I-522 advanced to the November 5, 2013 general election ballot. If passed into law by voters, I-522 would have taken effect on July 1, 2015. The initiative failed with 51% opposition. [3]

Contents

If approved, I-522 would have required that non-exempt foods and agricultural products offered for retail sale state "clearly and conspicuously" on the front of the package if they were genetically-engineered, contain or might have contained genetically-engineered ingredients.

With more than $17.1 million in donations opposed before September 30, I-522 set a new record for money spent against a state initiative, exceeding the $12.35 million spent in 2011 to oppose Initiative 1183, privatizing liquor sales. [4] By late October, No On I-522 had set the all-time record for any initiative campaign with $21 million. Combined contributions of $27.7 million are still less than $32.5 million spent by both sides around I-1183. [5]

Ballot title and summary

As described by the Secretary of State's office, the measure "would require most raw agricultural commodities, processed foods, and seeds and seed stocks, if produced using genetic engineering as defined, to be labeled as genetically engineered when offered for retail sale."

According to the official ballot measure summary,

This measure would require foods produced entirely or partly with genetic engineering, as defined, to be labeled as genetically engineered when offered for retail sale in Washington, beginning in July 2015. The labeling requirement would apply generally to raw agricultural commodities, processed foods, and seeds and seed stock, with some exceptions, but would not require that specific genetically-engineered ingredients be identified. The measure would authorize state enforcement and civil penalties, and allow private enforcement actions.

Full text of the measure is available online at the Washington state website. [6]

Provisions

I-522 is approximately nine pages long and adds a new chapter to Title 70 of the Revised Code of Washington.

Section one includes more than three pages stating various reasons for the initiative, related to consumer choice, religious belief, consumer health concerns, environmental concerns, economic concerns and worldwide trends in consumer labeling laws. This section explains that 49 countries, including many significant US trading partners Japan, South Korea, China, Australia, Russia and the European Union have labeling requirement for genetically engineered foods. This section asserts that labeling will give Washington's foods a share of the multibillion-dollar lost market opportunity in exports to these countries.

Section two establishes various definitions, including section 2(3)(a) which strictly defines "genetically engineered" by specific genetic engineering techniques, and differentiated from selective breeding. These specific genetic engineering techniques include various recombinant DNA and RNA methods such as micro-injection, electroporation, micro-encapsulation, liposome fusion, protoplast fusion or other "hybridization techniques that overcome natural physiological, reproductive or recombination barriers, where the donor cells or protoplasts do not fall within the same taxonomic family, in a way that does not occur by natural multiplication or natural recombination."

Section three requires that "any food offered for retail sale" be labeled "clearly and conspicuously" if it contains genetically-engineered ingredients, with certain exceptions. Exemptions consistent with current federal regulations include prepared foods such as those coming from a restaurant, meat from animals fed genetically engineered feeds, alcoholic beverages and foods processed with GE enzymes. [7] For non-exempt foods, it would require "on the front of the package" the words "genetically engineered," "produced with genetic engineering," "partially produced with genetic engineering" or "may be partially produced with genetic engineering" stated "clearly and conspicuously."

Section four authorizes the Washington State Department of Health to "adopt rules necessary to implement" the law, with section five authorizing civil penalties for violations, section six noting that I-522 creates a new chapter for RCW Title 70 and section seven a basic severability clause.

Support

Support for the I-522 was coordinated by YES on 522, a group that included food activists[ who? ], small-scale producers and several food co-operatives such as PCC Natural Markets [8] [9] and natural food stores such as Whole Foods Market. [10] It was also promoted by the Organic Consumers Association, which called for a boycott on Safeway Inc. unless the grocery store company would withdraw from the Grocery Manufacturers Association and contribute financially to the Yes on 522 campaign. [11] In addition to being the single largest donor, Dr Bronner's Magic Soaps issued a special label in support of I-522. [12]

Other support came from labor groups including the Washington State Labor Council. [13] The Yes on 522 web page for endorsements lists over 350 businesses, 25 seafood groups, 150 farms, more than 100 other groups, 45 elected officials and many individuals. [14] As of mid-October, 2013, reported campaign donations showed more than 13,000 donors for I-522 giving $6.2 million with a median donation of approximately $25. [15]

Opposition

Opposition to I-522 came primarily from large chemical corporations (Monsanto Company, DuPont Pioneer, Dow AgroSciences LLC, and Bayer CropScience), and organizations such as Washington Friends of Farms and Forests, Northwest Food Processors, Washington Association of Wheat Growers, the Washington State Farm Bureau and the Grocery Manufacturers Association, who rallied and mounted a $46 million campaign via Nestle SA, General Mills Inc., Coca-Cola Co and PepsiCo Inc to defeat the initiative. [16] [17] [18] These large donations have reportedly "shattered" previous fundraising records against any other initiative, a full month ahead of the election. [19]

Opponents of I-522 cited the editorial boards of fifteen different newspapers as opposing the initiative. [20] As of mid-October, 2013, reported campaign donations showed ten donors for I-522 giving $17.2 million with a median donation of approximately $545,827. [15]

Donors

Public records of initiative donations are listed at the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission website. [21]

Dr Bronner's Magic Soap Company was the largest donor in support, and the only pro-522 donor giving more than $1 million. The largest donation in opposition was $7.2 million of opposition money was identified as coming from the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), details of which emerged after Washington state attorney general Bob Ferguson filed charges against them for violation of state campaign-finance laws. [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] As of October 25, 2013, GMA had reportedly given $11 million in total. [27] [28]

In 2022, GMA (renamed the Consumer Brands Association) paid $9 million to settle the charges, and apologized for the violations. [29]

State law requires the top five contributors to be listed. As of October 23, 2013 the largest contributors in support of I-522 are Dr Bronner's Magic Soaps, Organic Consumer Fund Committee to Label GMOs in WA State, Joseph Mercola, Presence Marketing Inc, and Nature's Path Foods USA. The top five contributors in opposition to I-522 are the Grocery Manufacturers Association, Monsanto Company, DuPont Pioneer, Dow AgroSciences LLC, and Bayer CropScience.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genetic engineering</span> Manipulation of an organisms genome

Genetic engineering, also called genetic modification or genetic manipulation, is the modification and manipulation of an organism's genes using technology. It is a set of technologies used to change the genetic makeup of cells, including the transfer of genes within and across species boundaries to produce improved or novel organisms. New DNA is obtained by either isolating and copying the genetic material of interest using recombinant DNA methods or by artificially synthesising the DNA. A construct is usually created and used to insert this DNA into the host organism. The first recombinant DNA molecule was made by Paul Berg in 1972 by combining DNA from the monkey virus SV40 with the lambda virus. As well as inserting genes, the process can be used to remove, or "knock out", genes. The new DNA can be inserted randomly, or targeted to a specific part of the genome.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genetically modified food</span> Foods produced from organisms that have had changes introduced into their DNA

Genetically modified foods, also known as genetically engineered foods, or bioengineered foods are foods produced from organisms that have had changes introduced into their DNA using the methods of genetic engineering. Genetic engineering techniques allow for the introduction of new traits as well as greater control over traits when compared to previous methods, such as selective breeding and mutation breeding.

Ballot Measure 27 of 2002 would have required the mandatory labelling of all genetically modified food sold in the U.S. state of Oregon. The measure was defeated in the November 5, 2002 general election with 371,851 votes in favor, 886,806 votes against. The measure was placed on the ballot as a result of initiative petition.

Flavr Savr, a genetically modified tomato, was the first commercially grown genetically engineered food to be granted a license for human consumption. It was developed by the Californian company Calgene in the 1980s. The tomato has an improved shelf-life, increased fungal resistance and a slightly increased viscosity compared to its non-modified counterpart. It was meant to be harvested ripe for increased flavor for long-distance shipping. The Flavr Savr contains two genes added by Calgene; a reversed antisense polygalacturonase gene which inhibits the production of the aforementioned rotting enzyme and a gene responsible for the creation of APH(3')II, which confers resistance to certain aminoglycoside antibiotics including kanamycin and neomycin. On May 18, 1994, the FDA completed its evaluation of the Flavr Savr tomato and the use of APH(3')II, concluding that the tomato "is as safe as tomatoes bred by conventional means" and "that the use of aminoglycoside 3'-phosphotransferase II is safe for use as a processing aid in the development of new varieties of tomato, rapeseed oil, and cotton intended for food use." It was first sold in 1994, and was only available for a few years before production ceased in 1997. Calgene made history, but mounting costs prevented the company from becoming profitable, and it was eventually acquired by Monsanto Company.

The Consumer Brands Association (CBA), formerly the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), is a United States-wide trade association for manufacturers of consumer packaged goods (CPG).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genetically modified food controversies</span> Controversies over GMO food

Genetically modified food controversies are disputes over the use of foods and other goods derived from genetically modified crops instead of conventional crops, and other uses of genetic engineering in food production. The disputes involve consumers, farmers, biotechnology companies, governmental regulators, non-governmental organizations, and scientists. The key areas of controversy related to genetically modified food are whether such food should be labeled, the role of government regulators, the objectivity of scientific research and publication, the effect of genetically modified crops on health and the environment, the effect on pesticide resistance, the impact of such crops for farmers, and the role of the crops in feeding the world population. In addition, products derived from GMO organisms play a role in the production of ethanol fuels and pharmaceuticals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The Non-GMO Project</span> Non-profit organization

The Non-GMO Project is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization focusing on genetically modified organisms. The organization began as an initiative of independent natural foods retailers in the U.S. and Canada, with the stated aim to label products produced in compliance with their Non-GMO Project Standard, which aims to prevent genetically modified foodstuffs from being present in retail food products. The organization is headquartered in Bellingham, Washington. The Non-GMO label began use in 2012 with Numi Organic Tea products.

Genetically modified canola is a genetically modified crop. The first strain, Roundup Ready canola, was developed by Monsanto for tolerance to glyphosate, the active ingredient in the commonly used herbicide Roundup.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Regulation of genetic engineering</span> Overview of the regulation of genetic engineering

The regulation of genetic engineering varies widely by country. Countries such as the United States, Canada, Lebanon and Egypt use substantial equivalence as the starting point when assessing safety, while many countries such as those in the European Union, Brazil and China authorize GMO cultivation on a case-by-case basis. Many countries allow the import of GM food with authorization, but either do not allow its cultivation or have provisions for cultivation, but no GM products are yet produced. Most countries that do not allow for GMO cultivation do permit research. Most (85%) of the world's GMO crops are grown in the Americas. One of the key issues concerning regulators is whether GM products should be labeled. Labeling of GMO products in the marketplace is required in 64 countries. Labeling can be mandatory up to a threshold GM content level or voluntary. A study investigating voluntary labeling in South Africa found that 31% of products labeled as GMO-free had a GM content above 1.0%. In Canada and the USA labeling of GM food is voluntary, while in Europe all food or feed which contains greater than 0.9% of approved GMOs must be labelled.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 California Proposition 37</span> Rejected GMO law

Proposition 37 was a California ballot measure rejected in California at the statewide election on November 6, 2012. This initiative statute would have required labeling of genetically engineered food, with some exceptions. It would have disallowed the practice of labeling genetically engineered food with the word "natural." This proposition was one of the main concerns by the organizers of the March Against Monsanto in May 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">March Against Monsanto</span> International protest movement

The March Against Monsanto is an international grassroots movement and protest against Monsanto, a producer of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and Roundup, a glyphosate-based herbicide. The movement was founded by Tami Canal in response to the failure of California Proposition 37, a ballot initiative which would have required labeling food products made from GMOs. Advocates support mandatory labeling laws for food made from GMOs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">StarLink corn recall</span> 2002 recall of foods containing genetically modified corn

The StarLink corn recalls occurred in the autumn of 2000, when over 300 food products were found to contain a genetically modified corn that had not been approved for human consumption. It was the first-ever recall of a genetically modified food. The anti-GMO activist coalition Genetically Engineered Food Alert, which detected and first reported the contamination, was critical of the FDA for not doing its job. The recall of Taco Bell-branded taco shells, manufactured by Kraft Foods and sold in supermarkets, was the most publicized of the recalls. One settlement resulted in $60 million going to Taco Bell franchisees for lost sales due to the damage to the Taco Bell brand.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mainstream Republicans of Washington</span> Centrist Republican political action committee

Mainstream Republicans of Washington is a political action organization dedicated to promoting moderation in the Republican Party in Washington state by providing financial and other support to centrist Republican candidates standing for election in swing districts and statewide office.

Charles M. "Chuck" Benbrook is an American agricultural economist, pesticide litigation consultant and former adjunct professor with the Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources at Washington State University. Benbrook was also the scientific advisor for the Organic industry research organization "The Organic Center" from 2004 to June 2012.

GMO Answers is a front group launched by the agricultural biotechnology industry in July 2013 to participate in public debate around genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in crops in the U.S. food supply.

Genetic engineering in Hawaii is a hotly contested political topic. The Hawaiian islands counties of Kauai, Hawaii and Maui passed or considered laws restricting the practice within their borders due to concerns about the health, the environment and impacts on conventional and organic agriculture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adam Eidinger</span> American businessman and activist (born 1973)

Adam Eidinger is a Washington D.C. businessman and cannabis rights activist, known for his role in spearheading Initiative 71, which legalized cannabis in the District of Columbia in 2015.

Genetic engineering in North America is any genetic engineering activities in North America

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps</span> Company in California

Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps is an American producer of organic soap and personal care products headquartered in Vista, California. The company was founded in the late 1940s by Emanuel Bronner and continues to be run by members of the Bronner family. The company's products are known for their text-heavy labels and the variety of their advertised uses for a single product. The company's 2017 annual revenue was $120 million.

The Grocery Manufacturers of America (GMA) is a food lobby group. It has existed since at least 1946. GMA "was the largest contributor of honoraria to US Senators in 1976". It was referred to as "the (American) food industry's power broker" in 1979, when its membership roll included 134 large corporations. In 1985, the Grocery Manufacturers of America was an incorporated association in Delaware. The GMA is a Political Action Committee.

References

  1. ↑ Reed, Sam; Washington State Secretary of State (2012), Proposed Initiative to the Legislature – 2012 , retrieved March 14, 2013
  2. ↑ Noble, Adam (February 1, 2012). "Secretary Wyman certifies I-522 to lawmakers". From Our Corner (blog). Washington Secretary of State . Retrieved March 14, 2013.
  3. ↑ Washington Secretary of State (November 26, 2013). "Initiative to the Legislature 522 Concerns labeling of genetically-engineered foods". November 5, 2013 General Election Results. Office of the Secretary of State. Retrieved November 4, 2014.
  4. ↑ Kamb, Lewis (October 1, 2013). "No on 522 campaign shatters state fundraising record for ballot measures". Seattle Times. Retrieved October 24, 2013.
  5. ↑ Kamb, Lewis (October 28, 2013). "No on 522 breaks fundraising record for Washington initiative campaigns". Seattle Times. Retrieved October 28, 2013.
  6. ↑ Reed, Sam (2012). "Initiative Measure No. 522 filed June 29, 2012" (PDF). Secretary of State of Washington . Retrieved March 14, 2013.
  7. ↑ Kamb, Lewis (October 22, 2013). "Truth Needle: I-522 ads stretch truth on what would be labeled". Seattle Times. Retrieved October 25, 2013.
  8. ↑ "I-522 Petition Supporters". Label It Washington. 2012. Retrieved March 14, 2013.
  9. ↑ "PCC Natural Markets contributes $100,000 in support of I-522". Press Release. PCC Natural Markets. October 1, 2012. Retrieved March 14, 2013.
  10. ↑ Linden, Rachel (January 10, 2013). "Whole Foods Will Ramp Up GMO Educational Efforts When I-522 Is Officially Approved For November Ballot". Seattle Post-Intelligencer . Retrieved March 14, 2013.
  11. ↑ "Organic Consumers Association Calls for Safeway Boycott". The Chronicle. 12 July 2013. Retrieved 2013-08-09.
  12. ↑ Johnson, Nathaniel (October 3, 2013). "Dr. Bronner's soapbox: Working GMO labels into a lather". Grist . Retrieved October 3, 2013.
  13. ↑ Connelly, Joel (October 10, 2013). "Labor supports Initiative 522, food labeling". Strange Bedfellows Blog. Seattle Post-Intelligencer . Retrieved October 11, 2013.
  14. ↑ Yes On 522. "Endorsements". Yes On 522. Retrieved October 23, 2013.
  15. 1 2 Minard, Anna (October 23, 2013). "Just Look Behind the Curtain: The Donor Lists for the GMO Initiative Say Everything". The Stranger . Retrieved October 23, 2013.
  16. ↑ Peters, Elizabeth (January 8, 2013). "NORTHWEST FOOD PROCESSORS ASSOCIATION RESPONDS TO STATE-LEVEL FOOD LABELING INITIATIVE". Press Release. Northwest Food Processors Association. Retrieved March 14, 2013.
  17. ↑ Brown, Steve; Dan Wheat (February 2, 2013). "Petition for GMO labels goes to Wash. Secretary of State". Capital Press . Retrieved March 14, 2013.
  18. ↑ "Wheat Growers Oppose Mandatory GM Labeling". Press Release. Washington Association of Wheat Growers. February 11, 2013. Retrieved March 14, 2013.
  19. ↑ Kamb, Lewis (October 1, 2013). "No on 522 campaign shatters state fundraising record for ballot measures". Seattle Times. Retrieved October 3, 2013.
  20. ↑ No on 522 Coalition (October 16, 2013). "Leading Washington Newspapers Urge NO on 522". Press Release. NO on 522 Coalition. Retrieved October 23, 2013.
  21. ↑ "Continuing Political Committees". Washington State Public Disclosure Commission. Archived from the original on September 7, 2013. Retrieved March 14, 2013.
  22. ↑ Gillam, Carey (October 16, 2013). "Washington state sues lobbyists over campaign against GMO labeling". Reuters. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
  23. ↑ Baker, Mike (October 18, 2013). "Coca-Cola, Pepsi among key brands that oppose Initiative 522". Seattle Times. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
  24. ↑ The Olympian, "GMO fight: Attorney General sues to force No on 522 donor to reveal sources of its $7.2 million contribution", October 16, 2013
  25. ↑ KGW, "WA AG sues food industry group over GMO initiative", October 17, 2013
  26. ↑ Seattle PI, "Faced with lawsuit, Grocery Manufacturers Association agrees to disclose campaign finances," October 18, 2013
  27. ↑ Le, Phuong (October 27, 2013). "No on Initiative 522 campaign sees influx of cash from food industry group". Associated Press. Retrieved October 28, 2013.
  28. ↑ Connelly, Joel (October 30, 2013). "AG: More violations in No on 522 money". Strange Bedfellows (political blog). Seattle Post-Intelligencer . Retrieved November 3, 2013.
  29. ↑ Jenkins, Don (March 2, 2022). "Food makers settle with Washington state for $9M over initiative campaign". Capital Press. Retrieved 2022-08-15.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.