1876 United States presidential election in South Carolina

Last updated

1876 United States presidential election in South Carolina
Flag of South Carolina.svg
  1872 November 7, 1876 1880  
Turnout101.3%
  President Rutherford Hayes 1870 - 1880 Restored (cropped).jpg SamuelJonesTilden.jpg
Nominee Rutherford B. Hayes Samuel J. Tilden
Party Republican Democratic
Home state Ohio New York
Running mate William A. Wheeler Thomas A. Hendricks
Electoral vote70
Popular vote91,87090,906
Percentage50.26%49.74%

South Carolina Presidential Election Results 1876.svg
County Results

President before election

Ulysses S. Grant
Republican

Elected President

Rutherford B. Hayes
Republican

The 1876 United States presidential election in South Carolina took place on November 7, 1876, as part of the 1876 United States presidential election. Voters chose 7 representatives, or electors to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.

Contents

South Carolina voted for the Republican nominee, Rutherford B. Hayes, over the Democratic nominee, Samuel J. Tilden. Hayes won the state by a very narrow margin of 0.53%, only 964 votes. Events such as the Hamburg massacre served to dissuade many Republican voters. [1] This would be the last time a Republican presidential candidate would win South Carolina until Barry Goldwater carried the state in 1964.

The results here, along with Florida and Louisiana, were strongly disputed due to the suppression of African-American voters in the state. The results in this state were determined through the Compromise of 1877, which awarded Hayes South Carolina and the election. Had Tilden won South Carolina, he would have won the election.

Due to Jim Crow laws disenfranchising many Black voters as well as some poor white voters, the total vote count of 182,776 votes cast in this election would not be surpassed until 1952, 76 years later, after the poll tax had been repealed. In fact, between 1884 and 1928, the total vote did not even pass 100,000.

The election in South Carolina was the oddest of the ones in Louisiana, Florida, and the other disputed state Oregon because the results showed over 101% of all registered voters turned out to vote for President.

Results

General Election Results [2]
PartyPledged toElectorVotes
Republican Party Rutherford B. HayesJohn Winsmith91,870
Republican Party Rutherford B. HayesT. B. Johnston91,852
Republican Party Rutherford B. HayesW. F. Myers91,830
Republican Party Rutherford B. HayesW. B. Nash91,804
Republican Party Rutherford B. HayesC. C. Bowen91,786
Republican Party Rutherford B. HayesWilson Cook91,432
Republican Party Rutherford B. HayesTimothy Hurley91,136
Democratic Party Samuel J. TildenJohn B. Erwin90,906
Democratic Party Samuel J. TildenWilliam Wallace90,905
Democratic Party Samuel J. TildenT. G. Barker90,896
Democratic Party Samuel J. TildenJ. W. Harrington90,895
Democratic Party Samuel J. TildenRobert Aldrich90,860
Democratic Party Samuel J. TildenJohn I. Ingram90,768
Democratic Party Samuel J. TildenSamuel McGowan90,737
Votes cast [a] 182,776

Results by county

CountyRutherford B. Hayes
Republican
Samuel J. Tilden
Democratic
MarginTotal votes cast [2]
#%#%#%
Abbeville 3,71849.43%3,80350.57%-85-1.13%7,521
Aiken 2,21843.31%2,90356.69%-685-13.38%5,121
Anderson 1,20923.20%4,00376.80%-2,794-53.61%5,212
Barnwell 2,83542.13%3,89457.87%-1,059-15.74%6,729
Beaufort 7,57077.08%2,25122.92%5,31954.16%9,821
Charleston 15,10363.24%8,78036.76%6,32326.47%23,883
Chester 2,44055.29%1,97344.71%46710.58%4,413
Chesterfield 98837.80%1,62662.20%-638-24.41%2,614
Clarendon 1,89657.11%1,42442.89%47214.22%3,320
Colleton 4,23359.16%2,92240.84%1,31118.32%7,155
Darlington 3,52156.26%2,73743.74%78412.53%6,258
Edgefield 3,12433.30%6,25766.70%-3,133-33.40%9,381
Fairfield 2,93059.00%2,03641.00%89418.00%4,966
Georgetown 2,79172.53%1,05727.47%1,73445.06%3,848
Greenville 1,77530.05%4,13269.95%-2,357-39.90%5,907
Horry 59723.59%1,93476.41%-1,337-52.82%2,531
Kershaw 2,07054.16%1,75245.84%3188.32%3,822
Lancaster 1,25945.32%1,51954.68%-260-9.36%2,778
Laurens 1,81438.42%2,90861.58%-1,094-23.17%4,722
Lexington 1,29538.19%2,09661.81%-801-23.62%3,391
Marion 2,50244.30%3,14655.70%-644-11.40%5,648
Marlboro 1,61745.43%1,94254.57%-325-9.13%3,559
Newberry 2,84457.29%2,12042.71%72414.59%4,964
Oconee 53720.38%2,09879.62%-1,561-59.24%2,635
Orangeburg 4,48661.28%2,83538.72%1,65122.55%7,321
Pickens 42317.49%1,99582.51%-1,572-65.01%2,418
Richland 3,90462.08%2,38537.92%1,51924.15%6,289
Spartanburg 1,54525.14%4,60174.86%-3,056-49.72%6,146
Sumter 3,89662.38%2,35037.62%1,54624.75%6,246
Union 1,80942.37%2,46157.63%-652-15.27%4,270
Williamsburg 2,45558.40%1,74941.60%70616.79%4,204
York 2,46643.39%3,21756.61%-751-13.21%5,683
Totals91,87050.26%90,90649.74%9640.53%182,776


Notes

  1. Based on totals for highest elector on each ticket

References

  1. Ehren K. Foley, "Sites of Violence: Cainhoy Riot," Citations: "Plan of the Campaign of 1876" Archived 2014-11-05 at the Wayback Machine , Papers of Martin Witherspoon Gary, South Caroliniana Library, Columbia, South Carolina, accessed 26 October 2014
  2. 1 2 "Journal of the Senate and House of Representatives together with Reports and Resolutions of the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina, Regular Session 1876-77". Reports and Resolutions of the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina: 210–212 via HathiTrust.