2002 Molise earthquakes

Last updated
2002 Molise earthquakes
Relief map of Italien Molise.png
Bullseye1.png
31/10
Bullseye1.png
01/11
Italy relief location map.jpg
Bullseye1.png
Bullseye1.png
01/11
UTC  time 
 A: 2002-10-31 10:32:58
 B: 2002-11-01 15:09:00
ISC  event 
 A: 3512908
 B: 6121342
USGS-ANSS  
 A: ComCat
 B: ComCat
Local date 
 A: 31 October 2002 (2002-10-31)
 B: 1 November 2002 (2002-11-01)
Local time 
 A: 11:32:58 CET
 B: 16:09:00
Magnitude 
 A: 5.9 Mw
 B: 5.8 Mw 
Depth 
 A: 22 km
 B: 21 km
Epicenter 41°41′N14°55′E / 41.69°N 14.91°E / 41.69; 14.91
41°41′N14°50′E / 41.68°N 14.84°E / 41.68; 14.84 [1]
Areas affected Italy: Molise & Apulia
Max. intensity MMI VIII (Severe) [2]
Foreshocksyes
Casualties29 killed

Two earthquakes hit the Italian regions of Molise and Apulia on 31 October at 10:32:58 (UTC) and 1 November at 15:09:00 (UTC). The shocks had magnitudes of 5.9 and 5.8 Mw respectively. [2] [3] Most of the victims were killed and injured when a school collapsed in the town of San Giuliano di Puglia: 26 of the 51 schoolchildren died, together with one of their teachers. In particular, none of the nine children in the school's 4th Year (mostly born in 1996) survived. [4]

Contents

Tectonic setting

Molise and Apulia lie above a series of thrust sheets that were emplaced northeastwards on top of the foreland of the Adriatic plate due to continental collision during the Neogene. In the southern part of the Apennines, the thrusting is no longer active, but it continues in northern Italy along the southern margin of the Po Plain. The foreland to the east is characterised by zones of active west–east trending dextral (right-lateral) strike-slip faulting. The best described of these zones is the Mattinata Fault, which has a clear topographic expression on the south side of the Gargano Peninsula and has been traced offshore into the Adriatic Sea. The estimated epicentre of the 1627 Gargano earthquake lies just beyond the western end of the known extent of the Mattinata Fault, although the link between the two remains uncertain. [1] [5]

The Molise and Apulia regions are areas of low historical seismicity and relatively few earthquake records are available from the instrumental era.

Earthquake sequence

The Molise earthquake sequence began with a series of foreshocks during the night of 30–31 October with the strongest at 03:27 local time. This had a magnitude of 3.5 ML and a maximum felt intensity of IV–V on the Mercalli intensity scale.

First mainshock

The first mainshock, and the largest of the sequence, took place at 11:32 local time. It had a magnitude of 5.9 Mw , with a focal depth of 22.3 km. It had a strike-slip focal mechanism, indicating movement on either a right lateral west–east fault or a left lateral north–south fault.

Second mainshock

The second mainshock occurred at 16:09 local time the following day. It was similar in magnitude to the first mainshock at Mw  5.8, with a focal depth of 19.1 km. It also had a strike-slip focal mechanism and its recalculated epicentre is about 8 km west of the first mainshock. [6]

Aftershocks

Large numbers of aftershocks were recorded following the mainshocks. They were distributed over a 15 km long zone. Almost all of the aftershocks occurred at shallower depths than the mainshocks, although none of them were shallower than about 8–10 km depth, suggesting that the ruptures did not extend to the top of the Apulian Platform. [7]

Interpretation

Taken together, the foreshocks, mainshocks and aftershocks define an approximately west–east near vertical plane about 15 km in length. Two fault segments of 5–7 km length ruptured in the mainshocks. [7] Passive seismic imaging using the dense network of seismometers deployed after the first mainshock has been used to image the fault zone responsible at the top of the Apulian Platform, which lies in the depth range of 4–6 km in the area of the earthquake sequence. This has identified a small pull-apart basin between two west–east trending strike-slip fault segments, with the sequence rupturing the northern segment. This zone is interpreted to be a western extension of the Mattinata fault system. [8]

The focal depth of the two mainshocks and most of the aftershocks suggest that the ruptures occurred in the basement, beneath the Apulian Platform limestones. [8] Most of the aftershocks were also caused by ruptures beneath the Apulian carbonate platform. [9]

Damage

First mainshock

The strongest tremor took place in the area of lower Molise, which is situated in the north-east of the Province of Campobasso. It reached from the Frentani Mountains to the Fortore valley. It lasted for 60 seconds and could be felt distinctly in the centre of Molise, in the Capitanata, the Province of Chieti, and could be felt in Marche, Bari, Benevento, Matera, Brindisi, Rome, Naples, Potenza, Salerno, Taranto and Pescara. [10]

San Giuliano di Puglia was near the epicentre (located between Campobasso, Larino and the Apennine Dauno). Due to the quake part of the roof of the school building "Francesco Jovine" collapsed. The school included a kindergarten, a primary school and a middle school. The roof landed on the lower part of the school. There were 57 children, 8 teachers and 2 caretakers trapped under the rubble. [10]

Second mainshock

The second mainshock produced similar intensities to the first but caused some additional damage that in general increased the observed intensity by about 0.5 on the MCS scale at many locations.

The combined isoseismal map for the two mainshocks shows a distinct west–east elongation, consistent with the interpreted west–east fault rupture. However, the observed intensities were locally highly variable, particularly in San Giuliano di Puglia. The greatest damage was observed in a newer part of the town built on a clay-rich layer, contrasting with the old town built on harder limestone bedrock, which was affected far less. [11] [12] [13]

Effects on buildings

Non-engineered masonry buildings were often badly affected. This was due to generally poor quality walls, a lack of ties (although they may have been ineffective had they been present, due to the poor quality walls), the recent replacement of light roofs with heavier alternatives, such as concrete slabs, or the building of additional storeys, all of which were compounded by a lack of maintenance. [11]

Churches were mostly badly affected, even in towns where most houses were unaffected. Very few of the buildings had ties and the general quality of the masonry walls was low, not much better than those observed in houses. [11]

Buildings with masonry walls and reinforced concrete floors performed particularly badly in the earthquakes, with many of those in the centre of San Giuliano di Puglia being severely damaged. Buildings built entirely of reinforced concrete represented only a small percentage of the buildings in the area, but these generally suffered little or no damage. A few, mostly those with irregular plans, were badly affected. [11]

The Francesco Jovine school was built in the 1960s using reinforced concrete and more recently an additional floor was added, also using reinforced concrete. The design of the recent addition was never analysed for earthquake safety as the area at the time was classified as category 1, "not subject to seismic hazard". [11]

Response

Immediately after the mainshocks, three "Centro Operativo Mistos" (COMs) were established in the area by the Protezione Civile to assist the local authorities and carry out other tasks such as transportation and road management, telecommunications, evacuations, logistics and the coordination of volunteers. The main COM was set up in Larino, with other subsidiary COMs in San Giuliano di Puglia and Casalnuovo Monterotaro. Additional centres, known as "Centro Operativo Comunales" (COCs), were established in San Martino in Pensilis, Bonefro, Colletorto, Ripabottoni and Provvidenti to temporarily take over the functions of the comunes. [11]

Relief operations were carried out by several organisations, including the Vigili del Fuoco, Italian Air Force, Italian Army, Italian Navy, Italian law enforcement, State Forestry Corps, ANAS and Italian Red Cross. Together with over 1400 volunteers, the maximum number of people involved was 3,715. [11]

The initial phase of the response involved evacuation of the inhabitants of the most severely affected areas so that they could be provided with temporary accommodation and food. Shelter was provided using a mixture of tents and caravans at two sites near San Giuliano and Ripabottoni. Nearly 10,000 people were given assistance, with provision of almost 8,000 beds in over 2,000 caravans and tents. [11]

Aftermath

The earthquake hazard maps for Italy were redrawn following this earthquake sequence. The scheme that existed at the time of the earthquakes of three categories, of which the lowest (uncategorised) was not considered to be at risk, was replaced with a fourfold classification. In the new classification, all areas were considered to be at risk of seismic events. Finally, in 2004 the whole country was assessed in terms of ground accelerations for which there is a 10% risk of exceedance in the next 50 years, which is considered the most effective way to reduce the vulnerability to future earthquakes. [14]

The Francesco Jovine school has been completely rebuilt using seismic base isolation techniques, to protect it against any future shocks. [10]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Earthquake</span> Sudden movement of the Earths crust

An earthquake – also called a quake, tremor, or temblor – is the shaking of the Earth's surface resulting from a sudden release of energy in the lithosphere that creates seismic waves. Earthquakes can range in intensity, from those so weak they cannot be felt, to those violent enough to propel objects and people into the air, damage critical infrastructure, and wreak destruction across entire cities. The seismic activity of an area is the frequency, type, and size of earthquakes experienced over a particular time. The seismicity at a particular location in the Earth is the average rate of seismic energy release per unit volume.

The Dasht-e Bayaz and Ferdows earthquakes occurred in Dashte Bayaz, Kakhk and Ferdows, Iran in late August and early September 1968. The mainshock measured 7.1 on the moment magnitude scale and had a maximum perceived intensity of X (Extreme) on the Mercalli intensity scale. Damage was heavy in the affected areas with thousands of lives lost in the first event and many hundreds more in the second strong event.

Striking southern Italy on 8 September, the 1905 Calabria earthquake had a moment magnitude of 7.2 and a maximum Mercalli intensity of XI (Extreme). The first major earthquake of the 20th century, it severely damaged parts of Lipari, Messina Province and a large area between Cosenza and Nicotera and killed between 557 and 2,500 people.

The 1986 Chalfant Valley earthquake struck southern Mono County near Bishop and Chalfant, California at 07:42:28 Pacific Daylight Time on July 21. With a moment magnitude of 6.2 and a maximum Mercalli intensity of VI (Strong), the shock injured two people and caused property damage estimated at $2.7 million in the affected areas. There was a significant foreshock and aftershock sequence that included a few moderate events, and was the last in a series of three earthquakes that affected southern California and the northern Owens Valley in July 1986.

The 1992 Cape Mendocino earthquakes occurred along the Lost Coast of Northern California on April 25 and 26. The three largest events were the M7.2 thrust mainshock that struck near the unincorporated community of Petrolia midday on April 25 and two primary strike-slip aftershocks measuring 6.5 and 6.6 that followed early the next morning. The sequence encompassed both interplate and intraplate activity that was associated with the Mendocino Triple Junction, a complex system of three major faults that converge near Cape Mendocino. The total number of aftershocks that followed the events exceeded 2,000.

The 1872 North Cascades earthquake occurred at 9:40 p.m. local time on December 14 in central Washington Territory. A maximum Mercalli intensity of VIII (Severe) was assessed for several locations, though less intense shaking was observed at many other locations in Washington, Oregon, and British Columbia. Some of these intermediate outlying areas reported V (Moderate) to VII shaking, but intensities as high as IV (Light) were reported as far distant as Idaho and Montana. Due to the remote location of the mainshock and a series of strong aftershocks, damage to structures was limited to a few cabins close to the areas of the highest intensity.

The 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake occurred at 16:16 Pacific Daylight Time on 15 October just south of the Mexico–United States border. It affected Imperial Valley in Southern California and Mexicali Valley in northern Baja California. The earthquake had a relatively shallow hypocenter and caused property damage in the United States estimated at US$30 million. The irrigation systems in the Imperial Valley were badly affected, but no deaths occurred. It was the largest earthquake to occur in the contiguous United States since the 1971 San Fernando earthquake eight years earlier.

The 1805 Molise earthquake occurred on 26 July at 21:01 UTC. It has an estimated magnitude of 6.6 on the equivalent magnitude scale (Me) and a maximum perceived intensity of X on the Mercalli intensity scale. The area of greatest damage was between the towns of Isernia and Campobasso, while the area of intense damage extended over about 2,000 square kilometres. There were an estimated 5,573 deaths resulting from this earthquake and two of the aftershocks.

The 1979 Coyote Lake earthquake occurred at 10:05:24 local time on August 6 with a moment magnitude of 5.7 and a maximum Mercalli Intensity of VII. The shock occurred on the Calaveras Fault near Coyote Lake in Santa Clara County, California and resulted in a number of injuries, including some that required hospitalization. Most of the $500,000 in damage that was caused was non-structural, but several businesses were closed for repairs. Data from numerous strong motion instruments was used to determine the type, depth, and extent of slip. A non-destructive aftershock sequence that lasted throughout the remainder of the month was of interest to seismologists, especially with regard to fault creep, and following the event local governments evaluated their response to the incident.

The 1992 Murindó earthquake occurred on October 18 at 15:11 UTC with an epicenter in the Department of Chocó, northern Colombia. The shallow magnitude 7.2 earthquake struck northwest of the town of Murindó, killing ten and injured more than a hundred. Thirty-three municipalities were severely damaged.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2002 Afyon earthquake</span> Earthquake in Turkey

The Afyon Province of western Turkey was struck by an earthquake measuring 6.5 Mw on 3 February 2002 at 10:11 local time. It had a maximum felt intensity of VIII (Severe) on the Modified Mercalli intensity scale. It damaged hundreds of buildings and caused the deaths of 44 people and a further 318 injuries.

The 1968 Borrego Mountain earthquake occurred on April 8, at 18:28 PST in the geologically active Salton Trough of Southern California. The Salton Trough represents a pull-apart basin formed by movements along major faults. This region is dominated by major strike-slip faults one of them being the San Jacinto Fault which produced the 1968 earthquake. The mainshock's epicenter was near the unincorporated community of Ocotillo Wells in San Diego County. The moment magnitude (Mw ) 6.6 strike-slip earthquake struck with a focal depth of 11.1 km (6.9 mi). The zone of surface rupture was assigned a maximum Modified Mercalli intensity (MMI) of VII.

The 1902 Turkestan earthquake devastated Xinjiang, China, near the Kyrgyzstan border. It occurred on August 22, 1902, at 03:00:22 with an epicenter in the Tien Shan mountains. The thrust earthquake measured 7.7 on the moment magnitude scale (Mw ) and had a depth of 18 km (11 mi).

The 1986 Kalamata earthquake struck the southern Peloponnese Region of Greece on September 13 at 20:24 local time. The 12.5 km (7.8 mi) deep moment magnitude (Mw ) 5.9 earthquake had an epicenter near the coastal city of Kalamata and was assigned X (Extreme) on the Mercalli intensity scale. The earthquake was the result of normal faulting along a northwest-dipping fault and produced surface ruptures. Extensive damage was reported in Kalamata and Elaiochori. At least 20 people died and 330 were injured. Survivors sought refuge at campsites and reconstruction work lasted five years.

The 1990 Carlentini earthquake occurred off the Sicilian coast, 20 km east northeast from the town of Augusta, Sicily on 13 December at 01:24 local time. The moderately-sized earthquake measuring 5.6 on the moment magnitude scale (Mw ) resulted in the deaths of 19 people and caused at least 200 injuries. It also inflicted significant damage in the region, leaving 2,500 homeless.

On December 5, 1456, the largest earthquake to occur on the Italian Peninsula struck the Kingdom of Naples. The earthquake had an estimated moment magnitude of Mw  7.19–7.4, and was centred near the town of Pontelandolfo in the present-day Province of Benevento, southern Italy. Earning a level of XI (Extreme) on the Modified Mercalli intensity scale, the earthquake caused widespread destruction in central and southern Italy. Estimates of the death toll range greatly with as many as 70,000 deaths reported. It was followed by two strong Mw  7.0 and 6.0 earthquakes to the north on December 30. The earthquake sequence is considered the largest in Italian history, and one of the most studied.

The second shock in the 1962 Irpinia earthquake sequence was the largest and most destructive in a series of earthquakes in the southern Apennines. It occurred on 21 August at 18:19 CET, measuring Mw 6.15 and assigned a maximum intensity of IX (Violent). It was preceded by an Mw  5.68 foreshock, and followed by a 5.34 aftershock. The earthquakes resulted in nearly 20 fatalities and significant property losses.

The 1977 Bob–Tangol earthquake struck Kerman province of Iran on December 20, 1977, at 03:04 Iran Standard Time. The earthquake measured Mw 5.9 and struck at a depth of 22.7 km (14.1 mi). A maximum Modified Mercalli intensity of VII was evaluated based on damage. It had a strike-slip focal mechanism, which was unusual as the source structure was a thrust fault. It was part of a sequence of strong earthquakes along the 400 km (250 mi) Kuh Banan Fault. Between 584 and 665 people perished while a further 500–1,000 were injured; thousands were also made homeless. Casualties from the earthquake was considered moderate due to the sparsely populated area it affected. Preceded by foreshocks the month before, many residents became wary of a larger earthquake and took refuge outside their homes, contributing to the moderate death toll. However, there were none immediately before the mainshock so many were still in their homes when it struck. Aftershocks were felt for several months, some causing additional damage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1988 Tennant Creek earthquakes</span> Sequence of strong quakes in Northern Territory

On 22 January 1988, a sequence of destructive earthquakes measuring 6.2, 6.3, and 6.6 struck southwest of Tennant Creek, Australia which was felt as far north as Darwin and in other regions of the country. The largest event of the sequence was the largest earthquake ever recorded in mainland Australia since records began in 1800. An intensity of IX (Violent) was observed. Despite the large magnitude of the earthquakes and a close proximity to a town, in a country where earthquakes of this size are not common, damages were limited. Thousands of aftershocks were reported and felt across Northern Territory.

The 1983 Kaoiki earthquake struck southern Hawaii Island on the morning of November 16, 1983. Measuring Mw  6.7, it was the largest to hit the island since 1975. The epicenter was located 50 km (30 mi) southeast of Hilo with an approximated depth of 12 km (7 mi). The shallow strike-slip earthquake was assigned a maximum intensity of IX (Violent) on the Modified Mercalli scale. 6 people were injured, widespread damage and landslides were reported across the island.

References

  1. 1 2 Di Luccio, F.; Fukuyama, E.; Pino, N.A. (2005). "The 2002 Molise earthquake sequence: What can we learn about the tectonics of southern Italy?". Tectonophysics. 405 (1–4): 141–154. Bibcode:2005Tectp.405..141D. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2005.05.024.
  2. 1 2 ANSS. "Molise 2002a: M 5.9 – southern Italy". Comprehensive Catalog. U.S. Geological Survey. Retrieved 25 April 2020.
  3. ↑ ANSS. "Molise 2002b: M 5.8 – southern Italy". Comprehensive Catalog. U.S. Geological Survey. Retrieved 25 April 2020.
  4. ↑ "La classe del '96 non esiste più (The class of '96 no longer exists)". La Stampa: Cronaca (in Italian). 14 July 2007. Retrieved 28 November 2020.
  5. ↑ Di Bucci, D.; Mazzoli, S. (2003). "The October–November 2002 Molise seismic sequence (southern Italy): an expression of Adria intraplate deformation". Journal of the Geological Society. 160 (4): 503–506. Bibcode:2003JGSoc.160..503D. doi:10.1144/0016-764902-152. S2CID   131445045.
  6. ↑ Vallée, M.; Di Luccio, F. (2005). "Source analysis of the 2002 Molise, southern Italy, twin earthquakes (10/31 and 11/01)". Geophysical Research Letters. 32 (12). Bibcode:2005GeoRL..3212309V. doi: 10.1029/2005GL022687 .
  7. 1 2 Chiarabba, C.; De Gori, P.; Chiaraluce, L.; Bordoni, P.; Cataaneo, M.; De Martin, M.; Frepoli, A.; Michelini, A.; Monachesi, A.; Moretti, M.; Augliera, G.P.; D'Alema, E.; Frapiccini, M.; Gassi, A.; Marzorati, S. (2005). "Mainshocks and aftershocks of the 2002 molise seismic sequence, southern Italy". Journal of Seismology. 9 (4): 487–494. Bibcode:2005JSeis...9..487C. doi:10.1007/s10950-005-0633-9. S2CID   128747306.
  8. 1 2 Latorre, D.; Amato, A.; Chiarabba, C. (2010). "High-resolution seismic imaging of the Mw5.7, 2002 Molise, southern Italy, earthquake area: Evidence of deep fault reactivation". Tectonics. 29 (4). Bibcode:2010Tecto..29.4014L. doi:10.1029/2009TC002595. S2CID   129484945.
  9. ↑ Chiarabba, C.; De Gori, P.; Latorre, D.; Amato, A. (2014). "Crustal structure in the area of the 2002 Molise earthquake: Clues for the evolution of the southern Apennines". Tectonics. 33 (5): 741–755. Bibcode:2014Tecto..33..741C. doi: 10.1002/2013TC003406 . S2CID   130437960.
  10. 1 2 3 Protezione Civile. "Molise earthquake 2002". Site of the Civil Protection Department – Presidency of the Council of Ministers. Retrieved 29 September 2022.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mola, E.; Tsionis, G.; Taucer, F.; Pinto, A. (2003). The Molise (Italy) earthquakes of 31 October and 1 November 2002: Report and analysis from a field mission (Report). European Laboratory for Structural Assessment.
  12. ↑ Pinto, A.V.; Tsionis, G.; Mola, E.; Taucer, F. (2003). "Preliminary Investigation of the Molise (Italy) Earthquakes of 31 October and 1 November 2002". Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 1 (3): 349–370. Bibcode:2003BuEE....1..349P. doi:10.1023/B:BEEE.0000021425.85961.f7. S2CID   109901189.
  13. ↑ Puglia, R.; Vona, M.; Klin, P.; Ladina, C.; Masi, A.; Priolo, E.; Silvestri, F. (2013). "Analysis of Site Response and Building Damage Distribution Induced by the 31 October 2002 Earthquake at San Giuliano di Puglia (Italy)". Earthquake Spectra. 29 (2): 497–526. Bibcode:2013EarSp..29..497P. doi:10.1193/1.4000134. S2CID   109250904.
  14. ↑ "Il terremoto del Molise del 2002, dieci anni dopo". INGVterremoti (in Italian). 1 November 2012. Retrieved 27 September 2022.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.