Date | December 2016 – March 2017 |
---|---|
Location | Zimbabwe |
Deaths | 251 [1] |
Non-fatal injuries | 128 people [1] |
Property damage | US$189m [1] |
Displaced | ~2,000 people displaced, 160,000+ impacted [1] |
Zimbabwe experienced severe floods from December 2016 through March 2017 due to heavy rains that followed a two-year drought. [1] [2] [3]
Zimbabwe's rainy season began in October 2016, continuing through December. [3] [4] [5] The situation was worsened by Cyclone Dineo, which made landfall in Mozambique on 15 February 2017. [6] It was downgraded to a tropical depression as it crossed into Zimbabwe the following day. [5] Up to 100 mm of rain fell within 24 hours, causing the Gwayi River to overflow, [5] [7] flooding nearby villages and destroying homesteads and public infrastructure. [1] [4] [5]
Forty-five districts were affected, with Matabeleland, Midlands, Masvingo, Mashonaland West, Manicaland, and Metropolitan provinces hit hardest. [1] [6] [8] The government estimated that the floods killed 251 [1] and injured at least 128 people. [1] Private and public infrastructure were damaged or destroyed, including 5 bridges, [9] more than 140 dams, [9] 388 schools, and 2,579 houses, leaving many people marooned and homeless. [1] [6] Nearly 2,000 people were internally displaced in the worst affected Tsholotsho district, [4] of which over 859 (mostly children) were sheltered in a temporary camp. [1] [5] [6] Water supply infrastructure was damaged, compromising water quality, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), leaving up to 100,000 people without safe drinking water, and contributing to disease outbreaks including typhoid, cholera, and malaria. [4] [6] [10] [11]
The Zimbabwean Government declared the floods a national emergency at the beginning of March 2017, issuing appeals to the private sector, development partners, NGOs, and foreign governments for international assistance. [1] [4] [5] [6] The total funding needed for immediate emergency assistance and long-term infrastructure rebuilding was estimated at US$189 million. [1] [12]
The 2016-2017 floods were attributed to the La Niña phenomenon resulting in heavy rainfall and tropical cyclonic activity. [13] [14] It followed the 2014–2016 El Niño event which resulted in reduced rainfall and drought. [2] This transition from severe drought conditions to excessive wet conditions led to rapidly saturated grounds. [4]
In February 2017, Cyclone Dineo originated from the Mozambique Channel in the Indian Ocean, with winds reaching a peak strength of 129.6 km/h. [15] After making landfall, it hit the southeastern coast of Mozambique on 15 February with winds exceeding 100 km/h. [15] [16] The storm continued inland to reach Zimbabwe on 16 February, bringing heavy rains and strong winds with up to 100 mm of rain in 24 hours. [6]
A high broad plateau called the Highveld, part of the Zambezian region, crosses the spine of Zimbabwe at approximately 1,200 meters above sea level. [17] This plateau forms a watershed with lower regions on either side. [18] The surrounding areas slope into the Zambezi River basin to the north, the Limpopo River basin to the south, and the Save River basin to the southeast, making the low-lying regions more prone to flooding. [17] [18] [19]
Because of La Niña, many rivers and their tributaries had already received above-average rainfall, and the grounds were already saturated, leading to surface run-off. [4] Cyclone Dineo made the situation worse, resulting in 85% of the country's dams overflowing, exacerbating the flooding situation. [4] [20]
About 70% of the soil consists of granite-derived sandy soils that are susceptible to degradations such as leaching and erosion under heavy rains. [17] [21] Deforestation activities and soil degradation from farming and mining have made the country susceptible to floods by weakening the natural ability of trees to absorb water and reducing soil water retention capacity. [11] [22] [23]
Infrastructure such as dams, roads, bridges, or homesteads were prone to damage during heavy rains because they were old, outdated, or built with poor-quality construction materials, lacking the robustness to withstand such high volumes of water. [13] [24]
More than 70% of the population relies on agriculture as their primary source of income. [11] [25] Many reside in low-lying rural regions near rivers which offer rich soil for cultivation but are highly vulnerable to flooding. [11] [26]
The government was unprepared and poorly equipped to properly respond to such a large-scale disaster due to its lack of funding, workforce, and resources, and its inability to implement climate change adaptation strategies. [11] [14] [27] Early warning systems and information dissemination were insufficient because they failed to reach the most vulnerable populations in remote rural areas, which often do not have access to newspapers, television, radio, or telephones. [11] [14] [28] [27]
The Civil Protection Act (Chapter 10:06) of 1989 was the main government policy guiding disaster risk management at the time. [7] [11] It established the Department of Civil Protection (DCP), which was the authority responsible for coordinating disaster response and providing assistance at provincial or district levels. Its primary focus was on disaster response rather than on preparedness. [7] [29] In 2017, the DCP received .004% (US$286k) of the annual national budget to manage disasters. [11]
The Disaster Risk Management Act bill was introduced in 2011, designed to ensure financial stability and structural reforms to provide the needed access to resources. [11] [14] [30] [31] However, at the time of the disaster, it was not yet approved by the legislature. [30] [31] Once implemented, the act reforms the nation's disaster risk management to be better in line with the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and provides a minimum of 1% of the national budget for disaster risk management. [11] [31]
Zimbabwe was a lower-middle-income country [32] with a population of 14.8 million at the time of the event in 2017 (16.7 million people in 2024). [33] GNI per capita PPP (international) was US$2,160 with a GDP annual growth rate of 4.1%, and 30.4% living below the national poverty line. [34]
Also in 2017, life expectancy at birth was 61 years, with 55.8 newborns out of 1,000 births dying before the age of five. [34] Primary education was completed by 90.7% of the population. [34] Thirty-seven percent had access to safe sanitation services, 44% had access to electricity, and 24% had access to the internet. [35]
Forty-five of the country's 65 districts experienced flooding, prompting the government to declare a national disaster. [1] [8] Thirty-seven districts were severely affected, notably within the Matabeleland (North, West, South, and Central), Midlands, Masvingo, Mashonaland West, Manicaland, and Metropolitan provinces. [1] [6] [8]
The low-lying regions of the country bore the brunt of the flooding impact, especially the Tsholotsho district in Matabeleland North, which was reported as one of the worst affected. [36] Inadequate drainage and flat terrain contributed to flooding, as did proximity to the Gwayi River, adding vulnerability to flash floods. [36] Extensive damage also affected regions in southern and western Zimbabwe, including Bulawayo and areas near the Mozambique border. [5]
In total, about 160,000 people were affected by the floods from December 2016 through March 2017, many of whom were women and school-age children. [6]
2,579 houses were demolished, leaving thousands homeless. [1] Almost 2,000 were displaced within the Tsholotsho districts of Matabeleland North, of which 859 people representing 190 families were sheltered in a nearby temporary camp. [1] [5] [8] They included vulnerable groups, 54% children (159 children under the age of five), 57 elderly (including eight disabled), 86 chronically ill children, and 39 children on HIV antiretroviral therapy. [1] [5] Poor sanitary conditions in overcrowded shelters made people more vulnerable to diseases of the respiratory system and skin. [6] As of June 2017, all temporary shelter camp evacuees were relocated to higher ground and provided with basic shelter materials by the government. [6]
Breaches of 140 communities and privately owned dams caused extensive downstream infrastructure damage, especially in Matabeleland (South and North) and Midlands provinces. Roads were damaged and bridges collapsed, leaving almost all districts inaccessible. [6]
Access to clean water, hygiene, and sanitation were severely impacted by the flood, particularly within overcrowded internally displaced persons (IDP) camps, heightening the risk of waterborne and vector-borne diseases, including cholera, typhoid, diarrhea, and malaria. [1] Over 100,000 were without access to safe drinking water due to water infrastructure damage. [1] Boreholes and latrines, including those at schools and healthcare facilities, were submerged and rendered unusable. [1]
388 schools (287 primary and 101 secondary) were destroyed by flooding, disrupting studies and increasing stress for 166,216 children. [1] Pupils from Mathuphula and Mahlaba primary schools were integrated at Sipepa Primary School, which had only six classrooms for 342 pupils and was quickly overcrowded. [1]
With agriculture forming a primary livelihood, significant losses in livestock, crops, and food supplies heavily impacted the rural population, contributing to food insecurity. [5] [11] Approximately 60% of the crops sown during the flood in January 2017 suffered waterlogging, leading to decreased yields. [5] [6] [36] In Tsholotsho district alone, 350 acres of land were submerged, killing 649 livestock. [37] Additional livelihoods were lost due to the flooding of 90% of small-scale mines, rendering them inoperable from the disaster. [6] The affected households relied extensively on food assistance and donations. [5]
The floods produced a number of short- and long-term health consequences impacting the physical and mental wellbeing of victims. Poor access to healthcare due to insufficient medical infrastructure was compounded by a national healthcare strike [38] at the time of the disaster, further magnifying the negative health consequences. [1] [8]
The flood and landslides caused physical harm to people in the form of drowning, lightning strikes, fractures, lacerations, and other injuries. The floods resulted in 251 reported deaths and 128 injuries. [1] [39]
The destruction of water supply infrastructure during the flooding allowed pathogens to contaminate water sources, increasing the burden of cholera, dysentery, typhoid, and hepatitis A. [6] About 100,000 people were exposed to unsafe drinking water by the disaster. [6] The Zimbabwe Ministry of Health reported 1,934 suspected and 59 confirmed typhoid cases, leading to five deaths. [1] In March 2017, four cases of cholera were reported in Chiredzi and Chipinge districts, including two deaths due to delayed treatment. [40] People living with disabilities were additionally burdened by a lack of health and hygiene-enabling facilities. [5]
Flood waters stagnate, creating a good breeding environment for mosquitoes and increasing cases of mosquito-borne diseases. [6] Eight flood-affected districts experienced malaria outbreaks during the disaster. [1] [6] 89,261 malaria cases, including 151 deaths, were reported in Zimbabwe from February through March. [41] An increase in reported cases and deaths were blamed on flooding and poor access to healthcare facilities. [41]
Most of the displaced people were women and children. [5] [6] Access to safe water and sanitation has a significant impact on women and girls, who experience difficulty with menstrual hygiene management, leading to the increased risk of disease and physical violence. Restricted water access is a double burden for women in Zimbabwe, who are culturally responsible for walking longer distances to collect and carry it to their families from safe sources. [42] Temporary shelter accommodations are crowded, poorly lit, and lack privacy, increasing the risk of gender-based violence and sexual assault of women and children. [5] [43]
The disaster significantly disrupted food systems, increasing food insecurity risks already raised by the two preceding years of drought. [1] [6] Approximately 10% of the rural population of Zimbabwe, or 1.1 million people, were rendered food insecure with poor nutrition in 2017, resulting from the destruction of crops, death of livestock, and damage to infrastructure caused by persistent rains. [44] [45] Chronic malnutrition led to stunting in 26% of children under the age of five the following year. [46]
Victims interviewed three years after the disaster reported feeling anger, depression, anxiety, and helplessness resulting from personal and economic losses. [45] Families experienced additional emotional turmoil as working-aged men out-migrated to Botswana and South Africa in search of new livelihoods, leaving women and children behind. [45]
The consequences faced by Zimbabwe through the 2016-2017 floods show that there were minimal mitigation and preparedness initiatives put in place for disasters, as is articulated by the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, to which Zimbabwe is a party. [27] [47] Local and international organizations responded to aid recovery for people affected by the disaster. [1] [6] [37] [48]
The Department of Civil Protection took steps to assess the damage and coordinate relief mechanisms. [5] [48] This included establishing a National Disaster Management Committee to oversee the disaster response and recovery. [6] The Government of Zimbabwe declared a state of national disaster on 3 March 2017, launching an appeal for humanitarian assistance, estimating that US$189 million was needed for emergency and recovery. [6] [49] Zimbabwe dispatched an immediate US$1 million, and allocated US$35 million more for the emergency. [1] [11]
The Zimbabwe Red Cross Society played a role through conducting rapid assessments and distributing relief supplies. They received funding from the International Federation of Redcross and Red Crescent Societies to support providing medical assistance, food and shelter to affected communities. [6] Local communities were involved in flood response and recovery. [37] The flood victims who had been exposed to secondary education improved their housing structures after the flood disasters, however, they faced challenges related to lack of resources and inadequate infrastructure. [37]
Various international organizations offered humanitarian assistance in response to the 2016-2017 Zimbabwean floods. These included the United Nations (UN), Government of Japan, NGOs like World Vision International, and The World Food Program. [1] [6] [49] The Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) allocated resources to support humanitarian assistance, which played a role in addressing immediate needs and filling response gaps. [1] [6]
International donors, including the UN (donating US$1.6m), [50] China (US$1.06m), [1] [50] United Kingdom DFID (US$990k), [50] USAID (US$300k), [50] the European Union (US$300k), [1] [50] and Japan (US$50k), [1] [50] directed emergency response funds and goods for the response in addition to pre-existing official development assistance commitments totalling US$726m [51] in 2017 that supported recovery. [1] [11]
Aid agencies provided assistance in form of camp coordination, health, education, nutrition, protection, and shelter. Furthermore, The UN coordinated relief efforts through a multi-stakeholder consultative forum composed of UN agencies, NGOs, the private sector and other donor communities. The World Food Program redirected food contributions from the drought response to the flood-affected communities. [1] However, the destruction of roads and bridges made it difficult to deliver aid in rural areas. [6]
The Government of Zimbabwe, UN agencies, NGOs, international experts, and academics studied the flooding event, disaster response, and recovery, prompting recommendations to enhance the preparedness and effectiveness of future actions. [5] [6] [11] [37] [52]
Zimbabwe's Meteorological Service Department operates an emergency warning system that broadcasts weather forecasts and emergency messages by mobile phone, radio, and newspaper. [11] Post-disaster analyses found that warning messages are not always timely and in a language spoken by audiences, nor do they provide actionable instructions to follow. [11] They recommend strengthening early warning systems that communicate clear emergency instructions promptly, including by SMS at no charge to receivers, that are tailored to each hazard zone and audience in an appropriate language. [6] [11] [48]
Disaster risk management authority is centralized within the national Department of Civil Production, which devotes limited resources to provincial and district levels. [29] Post-disaster analyses recommend building the capacity for disaster response within communities to enhance preparedness and recovery. [6] [11] [29] Community volunteers understand local contexts and can respond quickly to help their communities recover. [6] [37] Pre-positioning emergency supplies, including shelters, clothing, WASH materials, medicines, and construction supplies to hazard zones, where they are most likely to be needed ahead of disasters, will improve the speed and effectiveness of response. [5] [6] [11] [29]
Studies found that women, children, and other vulnerable populations like the elderly and disabled were disproportionately burdened by the disaster, yet victims and responding agencies report that their needs were not adequately considered by emergency planners. [5] [6]
Analyses recommend that prioritization of gender issues should be considered in all aspects of disaster planning and response. [6] These include improved privacy for women and children, distribution of sanitary kits for women in emergency supplies, more lighting and police presence in shelter camps, identification and protection of unaccompanied minors, and prioritizing nutrition and humanitarian aid provided to women, children, and other vulnerable populations. [5] [6] [42] [45]
Zimbabwe's national budget does not allocate funds for disaster resource management, therefore the Department of Civil Protection must request funding annually from the treasury and on an ad-hoc basis as disasters occur. [53] Studies report that bureaucratic process results in insufficient and delayed funding that focuses on disaster response rather than preparation, risk management, and the long-term recovery and relocation needs of affected populations. [6] [7] [11] Experts recommend more guaranteed funding is necessary for disaster preparedness and response activities. [1] [11] [14] [48] Further, they suggest that the distribution of funds to local levels would further support community disaster response capacity building and engagement in preparation and post-disaster recovery. [48]
Reports cite breached dams as an example of economic development that amplified the disaster's effect, suggesting that integrating disaster resource management principles with development is critical for reducing vulnerabilities and fostering sustainable growth. [6] [13] Pre- and post-disaster analyses of Zimbabwe's disaster readiness reveal that disaster risk management techniques are not known in government ministries outside of civil protection, including those responsible for infrastructure and economic development. [11] [13] Experts recommend that those involved in development policymaking and planning, such as regional economists, receive training on disaster resource management, including traditional knowledge systems used by local communities, as a part of the long-term development strategy. [6] [11] [37] [52] [54]
A disaster is an event that causes serious harm to people, buildings, economies, or the environment, and the affected community cannot handle it alone. Natural disasters like avalanches, floods, earthquakes, and wildfires are caused by natural hazards. Human-made disasters like oil spills, terrorist attacks and power outages are caused by people. Nowadays, it is hard to separate natural and human-made disasters because human actions can make natural disasters worse. Climate change also affects how often disasters due to extreme weather hazards happen.
A natural disaster is the very harmful impact on a society or community after a natural hazard event. Some examples of natural hazard events include avalanches, droughts, earthquakes, floods, heat waves, landslides, tropical cyclones, volcanic activity and wildfires. Additional natural hazards include blizzards, dust storms, firestorms, hails, ice storms, sinkholes, thunderstorms, tornadoes and tsunamis. A natural disaster can cause loss of life or damage property. It typically causes economic damage. How bad the damage is depends on how well people are prepared for disasters and how strong the buildings, roads, and other structures are. Scholars have been saying that the term natural disaster is unsuitable and should be abandoned. Instead, the simpler term disaster could be used. At the same time the type of hazard would be specified. A disaster happens when a natural or human-made hazard impacts a vulnerable community. It results from the combination of the hazard and the exposure of a vulnerable society.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is an agency of the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS), initially created under President Jimmy Carter by Presidential Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978 and implemented by two Executive Orders on April 1, 1979. The agency's primary purpose is to coordinate the response to a disaster that has occurred in the United States and that overwhelms the resources of local and state authorities. The governor of the state in which the disaster occurs must declare a state of emergency and formally request from the President that FEMA and the federal government respond to the disaster. The only exception to the state's gubernatorial declaration requirement occurs when an emergency or disaster takes place on federal property or to a federal asset—for example, the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, or the Space Shuttle Columbia in the 2003 return-flight disaster.
A humanitarian crisis is defined as a singular event or a series of events that are threatening in terms of health, safety or well-being of a community or large group of people. It may be an internal or external conflict and usually occurs throughout a large land area. Local, national and international responses are necessary in such events.
Emergency management is a science and a system charged with creating the framework within which communities reduce vulnerability to hazards and cope with disasters. Emergency management, despite its name, does not actually focus on the management of emergencies; emergencies can be understood as minor events with limited impacts and are managed through the day-to-day functions of a community. Instead, emergency management focuses on the management of disasters, which are events that produce more impacts than a community can handle on its own. The management of disasters tends to require some combination of activity from individuals and households, organizations, local, and/or higher levels of government. Although many different terminologies exist globally, the activities of emergency management can be generally categorized into preparedness, response, mitigation, and recovery, although other terms such as disaster risk reduction and prevention are also common. The outcome of emergency management is to prevent disasters and where this is not possible, to reduce their harmful impacts.
Disaster response refers to the actions taken directly before, during, or immediately after a disaster. The objective is to save lives, ensure health and safety, and meet the subsistence needs of the people affected. It includes warning and evacuation, search and rescue, providing immediate assistance, assessing damage, continuing assistance, and the immediate restoration or construction of infrastructure. An example of this would be building provisional storm drains or diversion dams. Emergency response aims to provide immediate help to keep people alive, improve their health and support their morale. It can involve specific but limited aid, such as helping refugees with transport, temporary shelter, and food. Or it can involve establishing semi-permanent settlements in camps and other locations. It may also involve initial repairs to damage to infrastructure, or diverting it.
An earthquake occurred at 08:50:39 Pakistan Standard Time on 8 October 2005 in Azad Jammu and Kashmir, a territory under Pakistan. Its epicenter was 19 km northeast of the city of Muzaffarabad, and 90 km north north-east of Islamabad, the capital city of Pakistan, and also affected nearby Balakot in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and some areas of Jammu and Kashmir, India. It registered a moment magnitude of 7.6 on the Richter scale and had a maximum Mercalli intensity of XI (Extreme). The earthquake was also felt in Afghanistan, Tajikistan, India and the Xinjiang region. The severity of the damage caused by the earthquake is attributed to severe upthrust. Although not the largest earthquake to hit this region in terms of magnitude it is considered the deadliest, surpassing the 1935 Quetta earthquake. Sources indicate that the official death toll in this quake in Pakistan was between 73,276 and 87,350, with some estimates being as high as over 100,000 dead. In India, 1,360 people were killed, while 6,266 people were injured. Three and a half million people were left without shelter, and approximately 138,000 people were injured in the quake.
The 1999 Vietnamese floods occurred in late October 1999 when Vietnam experienced the worst flooding in forty years. Tropical Storm No. 9 first appeared in heavy rain from 18 to 20 October, hitting the central provinces of Quang Binh, Quang Tri, Thua Thien Hue, Danang, Quang Nam in Vietnam. The rain was the first in a series of rainstorm events that lasted for two to three weeks.
Disaster risk reduction aims to make disasters less likely to happen. The approach, also called DRR or disaster risk management, also aims to make disasters less damaging when they do occur. DRR aims to make communities stronger and better prepared to handle disasters. In technical terms, it aims to make them more resilient or less vulnerable. When DRR is successful, it makes communities less the vulnerable because it mitigates the effects of disasters. This means DRR can make risky events fewer and less severe. Climate change can increase climate hazards. So development efforts often consider DRR and climate change adaptation together.
The May 2004 Caribbean floods were a flood event that affected the Caribbean Islands and Hispaniola from May 18, 2004, to May 25, 2004. Moving quickly from Central America, a low-pressure area brought heavy rainfall and thunderstorms to Cuba, Jamaica, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic resulting in rainfall amounts exceeding 500 mm within a 7-day period. Cities in flood-plain areas like Mapou, Haiti, and Jimani, of the Dominican Republic, experienced over 250 mm of rain between May 24 and 25, causing the Solie River to overflow, resulting in devastating environmental and infrastructure damage. With hundreds dead and thousands more displaced in Mapou and Jimani, the death toll was at its highest in decades, partly because of deforestation. Steep valley ridges and barren hillsides channeled rainwater towards valleys, creating landslides that overwhelmed and flooded cities particularly in high-poverty areas where buildings were wooden or makeshift temporary homes. In addition, inhabitants residing on these flood plains were subject to increased risk from water-borne diseases due to inadequate waste removal management and contaminated water supply due to excessive debris caused by flooding.
The 2008 Namibia floods took place in early February 2008, a rapid onset of heavy rains triggered floods in northern Namibia, leading to one of its worst floods in 50 years. The floods had killed 42 people by early March and an estimated 65,000 people were affected, primarily in the regions of Omusati, Oshikoto, Oshana, Ohangwena and Caprivi. 40,000 people were assisted by the Namibian Red Cross with 4,600 in relocation camps. Over-crowding and insanitary conditions caused health concerns in relocation camps and an outbreak of cholera was announced in March. On 14 March, the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs triggered the International Charter for "Space and Major Disasters". Staple crops were devastated and 52,000 people from flood-affected areas were considered in need of immediate of assistance to cover their basic food needs. Deputy Prime Minister Libertine Amathila declared that the government would spend 65 million Namibian dollars to assist the displaced. Long-term impacts included damage to farmland, housing, schools, roads and infrastructure across the region. The floods reduced the resilience of the population who were left vulnerable to further flooding which occurred in 2009.
A series of serious floods occurred from January 21 to February 12, 2012, with heavy rains causing flooding to hit Vanua and western Viti Levu. Nadi, Lautoka, Ba, Tavua and Rakiraki were the worst affected areas. The damage caused by this flood to all institutions including the government was FJ$50,047,344.00. Many infrastructure utilities and agricultural sectors were damaged.
Natural and manmade disasters tend to have a disproportionate impact on people with disabilities. This issue is recognized and addressed by Article 11 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) which states:
"States Parties shall take, in accordance with their obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law, all necessary measures to ensure the protection and safety of persons with disabilities in situations of risk, including situations of armed conflict, humanitarian emergencies and the occurrence of natural disasters."
Disaster preparedness in museums, galleries, libraries, archives and private collections, involves any actions taken to plan for, prevent, respond or recover from natural disasters and other events that can cause damage or loss to cultural property. 'Disasters' in this context may include large-scale natural events such as earthquakes, flooding or bushfire, as well as human-caused events such as theft and vandalism. Increasingly, anthropogenic climate change is a factor in cultural heritage disaster planning, due to rising sea levels, changes in rainfall patterns, warming average temperatures, and more frequent extreme weather events.
The Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA) was an organizational unit within the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) charged by the President of the United States with directing and coordinating international United States government disaster assistance. USAID merged the former offices of OFDA and Food for Peace (FFP) in 2020 to form the Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance (BHA).
Intense Tropical Cyclone Idai was one of the worst tropical cyclones on record to affect Africa and the Southern Hemisphere. The long-lived storm caused catastrophic damage, and a humanitarian crisis in Mozambique, Zimbabwe, and Malawi, leaving more than 1,500 people dead and many more missing. Idai is the deadliest tropical cyclone recorded in the South-West Indian Ocean basin. In the Southern Hemisphere, which includes the Australian, South Pacific, and South Atlantic basins, Idai ranks as the second-deadliest tropical cyclone on record. The only system with a higher death toll is the 1973 Flores cyclone that killed 1,650 off the coast of Indonesia.
Odisha State Disaster Management Authority is an agency of the Department of Revenue & Disaster Management whose primary purpose is to carry out responses to natural or man-made disasters and for capacity-building in disaster resiliency and crisis response. It was established as the Odisha State Disaster Mitigation Authority by a resolution of the Department of Finance of the Government of Odisha on 28 December 1999, as a response to the death toll and damage caused by a 1999 supercyclone. The chief secretary of Government of Odisha is the ex-officio chairperson of the governing body of the authority.
The 2020 Middle East storms occurred on 12 March 2020 when the Gulf of Aqaba-Eilat was struck by an intense storm system, in the form of a cyclone, that brought heavy rain, thunderstorms, floods and sandstorms to 9 countries in the eastern Mediterranean. The countries that were affected by the storm include Egypt, Jordan, Israel, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Iran and Iraq.
Tropical Cyclone Eloise was the strongest tropical cyclone to impact the country of Mozambique since Cyclone Kenneth in 2019 and the second of three consecutive tropical cyclones to impact Mozambique in the 2020–21 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season. The seventh tropical depression, fifth named storm and the second tropical cyclone of the season, Eloise's origins can be traced to a disturbance over the central portion of the South-West Indian Ocean basin which developed into a tropical depression on 16 January, and strengthened into a tropical storm on 17 January, though the storm had limited strength and organization. On the next day, the storm entered a more favorable environment, and it soon intensified to a severe tropical storm on 18 January. Late on 19 January, Eloise made landfall in northern Madagascar as a moderate tropical storm, bringing with it heavy rainfall and flooding. The storm traversed Madagascar and entered the Mozambique Channel in the early hours of 21 January. After moving southwestward across the Mozambique Channel for an additional 2 days, Eloise strengthened into a Category 1-equivalent cyclone, due to low wind shear and high sea surface temperatures. Early on 23 January, Eloise peaked as a Category 2-equivalent tropical cyclone on the Saffir–Simpson scale as the center of the storm began to move ashore in Mozambique. Shortly afterward, Eloise made landfall just north of Beira, Mozambique, before rapidly weakening. Subsequently, Eloise weakened into a remnant low over land on 25 January, dissipating soon afterward.
The Atami landslide was a natural disaster which hit the city of Atami on the 3rd of July in 2021. It was caused by heavy rainfall which resulted in significant damage to the community of Atami in Japan. The debris flow by the landslide resulted in life lost, infrastructure damage and had various health consequences. It was argued that the landslide could have been prevented or better managed by local authorities. The role of climate change is evident especially in a country like Japan that experience heavy rainfall. Better management of land use as well as disaster preparedness are critical to prevent and better manage future landslides in Japan.