Advertising to children

Last updated

Advertising to children refers to the act of advertising products or services to children as defined by national laws and advertising standards.

Contents

From the Advertising page; Advertising involves using communication channels to promote products or services to a specific audience. When it comes to children, advertising raises various questions regarding its application, duration, impact on youngsters, and ethical considerations surrounding the practice of targeting children. Understanding the effects of advertising on children's behavior and well-being is a complex and evolving field of study.

Scope and form

Advertising to children can take place on traditional media such as television, radio, print, new media, internet and other electronic media. The use of packaging, in-store advertising, event sponsorship, and promotions can also be classified as advertising.

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) defines early childhood as ages 0–8 years. [1] For the purposes of advertising law, the definition of a child varies from one jurisdiction to another. However, the age of 12 is commonly used as a cut-off point. This cut-off point is made in consideration of the widespread academic view that by age 12 children have developed their behavior as consumers, can effectively recognize advertising, and are able to adopt critical attitudes towards it. [2]

History

In the 20th century, the compulsory education of children was established which consequently made school-age children the target audiences of many publications. [3]

The publications in an attempt to raise potential sales, comic book promotion to the youth market rose in the 20th century. During this era, spot advertising (a form of advertising where advertisements appear between programs) came to be known as a prodigious way of advertising. [4] Additionally, sponsorship arrangements became increasingly popular as an advertising medium. [5] In the United States of America, advertisers sponsored television programs or films to promote their products through broadcast media.

With this rise in targeted advertising, concerns prevailed regarding advertising's ability to easily manipulate young children due to a limited ability to comprehend the implicit objective of advertisers. [6] Such concerns drove the introduction of national laws and advertising standards. Through the 1970s, the Big Three television networks in the United States did not view children as a desirable target audience, because they had no income of their own. [7]

Before national laws and advertising standards were introduced, a content creator on YouTube could promote their own merchandising during a video with no distinction between the video and the advertisement.

A late-August 2016 report indicated that various Internet streaming services, such as Netflix have prevented children of the 2010s from seeing 150 hours of commercials every year. [8]

Effects on children

Studies estimate that children between the ages of 6 and 11 spend on average 28 hours a week watching television [9] and are exposed to as many as 20,000 commercials in a single year. [10] The maximum number of 30-second ads that can appear in an hour of children's television is 24 ads on weekdays, 21 ads per hour on weekends. If a child watches one hour of programming daily, it translates to nearly 160 advertisements seen per week. [11] Since the 1970s, there has been a large amount of concern as to whether or not children can comprehend advertisements and the extent to which they do so. [12] A study conducted by Goldberg, M. E., & Gorn, G. J. in 1983 looked at the acquisition of children's cognitive defenses and found that until the age of 8 most children are unable to understand the selling intent of televised advertisements. Between the ages of 8 and 10 children only have a partial understanding of selling intent, and it is not until at least the age of 11 that a child is able to fully understand the selling intent of televised advertisements. [13] The study concludes that there is a large difference in a basic understanding of the purpose of advertising between children of a younger age and of older age, and as a result, different age groups have different reactions to television-based advertisements. [12]

There are positive and negative implications to television advertising on young children, for both marketers and the children who view the advertisements. Many advertising aimed at children is criticized for enforcing gender stereotypes. [14] Some countries have broadcast codes that suggest that television advertisements should not contain exaggerated claims that will mislead or deceive children, abuse their trust or lack the understanding of persuasive intent in an advertisement. [15]

Many parents report being pestered by their children for the product they have seen on television. [16] [17] This phenomenon is dubbed "pester power", which means that little children pester their parents to buy things for them that they desire. [18] A study showed that mothers are more likely to purchase a product for their children due to the emotional appeal of their children's response to an advertisement. [19]

Critics have likewise communicated concern with respect to the predominance of promoting brutal media, for example, films and computer games, focusing on children. Three reports by the Federal Trade Commission discovered significant help for such charges, and keeping in mind that reviews have not legitimately surveyed the effect of such publicizing, revealing that such advertisements do influence children's media inclinations. [20]

Television

Many advertisements involve children around the same age as the viewer. The latest technology; from laptops, and mobile phones, to toys are being advertised by companies to attract customers to buy their products. Companies now have new mediums and methods to spread their advertisements as a result of these emerging technologies. [21] Children can watch commercials with children of the same age acting overjoyed about a product, thus encouraging them to also purchase the product. [22] Advertising has a strong hold on behavior, as children are known to act out behavior and repeat quotes heard on advertisements-- even in situations contextually separate from the ad. [11] Television advertisements can create peer attention between children which may attract them to buy the products. Companies will still use ads to target children because they are worth billions in sales. [23]

The effect is seen mainly in young children. According to a study from the UK, it states that celebrities who endorse specific foods in television commercials are a powerful influence on children, and that effect may extend beyond the advertisement itself. That study contained 181 children, and was concluded that children ate more potato chips after seeing advertisements featuring a popular UK sports figure than children who only watched commercials for toys and nuts. [24] Jason C. G. Halford from University of Liverpool stated, "Obviously when they saw Gary Lineker in the advertisement, they ate a lot more crisps... but what was surprising was when we showed him presenting his show we found that it had the same effect as the advertisement." [24] Many types of research indicate that children are more likely to pick foods sponsored by celebrities, even when it is just fruit. A study in 2012 found that children who were offered both cookies and apples were more likely to choose the apple, if it had an Elmo sticker on it. [24] Researchers say that this phenomenon is worrisome, since most foods advertised on television are unhealthy, and linked to a child's health and weight long-term. Children are attracted to television advertisements, especially those featuring their beloved cartoons, which not only engage them positively but also create an intention to make purchases. [25] For instance, McDonald's stands out as a leader in targeting young children through television ads among fast-food chains. In 2016, McDonald's allocated $32.9 million for television advertising, with a specific focus on promoting Happy Meals tailored to children. Moreover, McDonald's outperforms other fast-food brands by employing strategies such as providing free cartoon characters and animal figurines in their Happy Meals. [26]

Advertising effects on children

One cause for concern for children is deceptive phone applications directed at them by appearing to be free, but have hidden fees within the app. In these instances, the initial download of the game application has no cost. However, when children are playing the game, there will be fees to gain new features for advancing to new levels. If the child would want to continue playing the game, they could have in-app purchases using their parent's credit card. Many apps ask for billing information, but there is a certain amount of time that the app is actually free. After the trial expires, the application automatically charges the person if they did not cancel before it ended. Kids who might not be aware of how things are marketed could accumulate charges on their parent's phone bills without their knowledge or consent. [27]

Television food advertisements

Television food advertisements are the essential elements in the television advertisements. A study suggested that across the countries around the world, 68,462 advertisements were identified, of which 18% were for food. Overall, food was the second most frequently advertised product, after channel promotions (23%); in each country, food products were in the top 3 advertised products. [28]

Television food advertisements can greatly affect the mindset and the thinking of the young children, especially the unhealthy food products. Advertising of unhealthy foods to children increases their consumption of the product [29] and positive attitudes (liking or wanting to buy) about the advertised product. [30] Children's critical reasoning (the ability to understand what an advertisement is and the aim of advertising to buy the product) is not protective against the impact of advertising, and does not appear to be fully developed during adolescence. [30]

Many studies have been conducted indicating an early exposure to food advertising to 2–13-year-old children has a link to the increasing number of childhood obesity cases globally. [31] The large exposure to commercial food has been linked to problems for children worldwide, among these problems the issue of child obesity. [32] In 2015 centers for disease control and prevention found that the number of obese children is more than double the number it was 30 years ago. [33] There is a suggested correlation between televised advertisements and obesity. A study conducted by Frederick J. Zimmerman and Janice F. Bell made the statement that "Commercial television pushes little children to eat a large quantity of those foods they should consume least: sugary cereals, snacks, fast food and soda pop". [34] On average children between the ages of 8 and 12 see 21 fast food advertisements a day through televised media. [35] Children decide their food preference at an early moment through a preliminary learning process and when they are exposed to large amounts of fast food advertising it has major long-lasting implications on their diet. [36] Children's gullibility and lack of knowledge around commercial food, allow them to easily trust what an advertisement says. As a result, companies can falsely display food items to children and what these children think to be healthy and nutritious is unhealthy being high in fats and sugars. [12]

The use of promotional characters and premium offers are often used as persuasive tools to market food to children. [37] [38] A study from Australia found that the rate of promotional characters in advertisements, such as The Milky Bar Kid for Nestle Milky Bar chocolate (in Australia) or Bart Simpson for Butterfinger (in America), is twice as high during popular younger children's programs in comparison to popular older children's programs. Premium offers are another persuasive marketing which includes competitions, giveaways and vouchers. The same study found that unhealthy food advertisements contain 18 times as many premium offers during young children's programs in comparison to adult programs. [39]

Additionally, several studies have identified that the amount of fruit and vegetables consumed decreases as television viewing time increases. [40] Excessive television viewing often correlates to poor diet quality as a result. [41] In the UK, only 1.2% of broadcast advertising spend is towards fresh vegetables, therefore indicating a lack of health-focused endorsement to children and families. [42]

The World Health Organization suggested that companies and organizations make a reduction of "food and beverage marketing directed at little children that are high in sugar, fat, and sodium in order to help reduce the burden of obesity worldwide." [43]

In Canada, the majority of advertising is controlled by companies themselves. [43] In April 2007, 16 of the largest food and beverage companies formed an initiative known as The Canadian Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative. The companies decided that each would require that at least 50% of advertisements targeted at children under the age of 12 years old would contain "healthier dietary choices". [43] A study found that exposing children to healthy food advertisements has a positive impact on their attitude towards healthy food, but when unhealthy food advertisements are shown alongside healthy food advertisements, this positive impact is lessened. [44]

Television advertisements not only affect children in the UK, but also affect children from Asiatic countries. A study suggested that children in developing countries may be more vulnerable to food promotions as they are less familiar with, and potentially less critical of, advertising than children in developed countries, and they may be specifically targeted as an entry point into developing markets as children have been seen to be more flexible than their parents. [45] The needs to provide suitable advertising to children is crucial especially in the age range between 2–13 years old, as they are usually immature and not yet developed their critical thinking which may easily affect their future growth.

Children are driven by image-based advertising, and the easier the image catches a child's attention or their tastebuds, the more influential the ad is for children. An easy way to make a product that children are curious about: Packaging must be child-friendly and handled easily. Bright graphics attract; so do funky names for flavors or attributes. Children favor small toys within a package, a little reward harking back to the days of Cracker Jacks. Children also like games, puzzles, magic tricks, and free offers printed on packages. [46]

Regulations for food advertising to children

In Australia, there is a self-regulatory code toward children's exposure to food advertising. This study was that the proportion of non-core foods advertised decreased by eighteen percent from a previous study from before the self-regulatory code was introduced. [31] This code was created because of the negative impact that the advertising of unhealthy food has on children. The self-regulatory code regulates the use of promotion, popular characters, and unsuitable material during time periods dedicated to children's television programs. The code does not monitor the types of food that may be advertised to children and does not apply to times when a high number of children are viewing such as a sports match. Since the code was introduced the rate of non-core fast food advertising has decreased as seen in the other study mentioned. The self-regulatory code only covers a small time period and range of food. An improved marketing approach would be limiting advertising on a wider range of fast food, not just those designated as children's meals. This study also saw that advertisement that promotes healthier alternatives often still have some non-core foods present. [47]

The Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI) [48] is a voluntary program implemented in 2007 in the United States, in response to public health concerns and food companies have promised to advertise healthier dietary choices in child-directed advertising. The advertising of candy to children appeared that it would decrease as 4 large candy manufacturers, Mars, Hershey, Kraft, and Nestle pledged to CFBAI that they would not advertise any candy product to children. Rather than a reduction in candy advertising, there was a 65% increase in candy-related advertisements in 2011 compared to 2007 before the CFBAI was introduced. A fault with the CFBAI is that it regulates advertising directed at children, many children are exposed to advertisements for candy during programs popular for a wider range of people. Increased participation in CFBAI and a clearer definition of what child-directed advertising is, will be required for a reduction in exposure to children's unhealthy foods. [49]

In the European Union, there was a concern for the quantity and type of television food advertising that children are exposed to. In 2010, the Audiovisual Media Services Directive [50] was created as a centerpiece of the regulation of advertising unhealthy food and drinks in or accompanying children's programs. The directive does not imply consistent regulations across Member states. It does state the "Member States and the Commission shall encourage media service providers to develop codes of conduct regarding inappropriate audiovisual commercial communications, accompanying or included in children's programs, of foods and beverages containing nutrients and substances with a nutritional or physiological effect". [51] Although there isn't a definition of a child and unhealthy food which is shared within the European countries, there is a consistent want for regulation. Each country implements a variation in the strength of its regulations, based on the framework created from the directive. Each country has a different legal point of view toward marketing practices, television regulations and the protection of minors. The individual European Union's Member States' interpretation of the Directive is left to the national regulators to set a clear degree of regulatory protection. This is set by the regulator along with the industry and broadcasters themselves who interpret the provisions. This results in a national regulation of advertising to children that considers the nation's legal and cultural traditions as well as economic and political objectives, which do not always compare across member states. Some member states impose a partial ban on advertising in children's programs, whereas others prohibit the showing of sponsorship logos in children's programs. [52]

Legislation

In the United Kingdom, Greece, Denmark, and Belgium advertising to children is restricted. In Norway, Sweden and the Canadian province of Quebec, advertising to children under the age of 12 is illegal. [53]

The European Union also has framework legislation in place which sets down minimum provisions on advertising to children for all its member states. The EU Audiovisual Media Services Directive, [54] due to replace the Television Without Frontiers Directive [55] in all member states by the end of 2009, sets out several EU-wide rules on advertising and children:

Advertising shall not cause moral or physical detriment to minors, and shall, therefore, comply with the following criteria for their protection:

a. It shall not directly exhort minors to buy a product or a service by exploiting their inexperience or credulity;
b. It shall not directly encourage minors to persuade their parents or others to purchase the goods or services being advertised;
c. It shall not exploit the special trust minors place in parents, teachers or other persons;
d. It shall not unreasonably show minors in dangerous situations

In addition:

e. Children's programs may only be interrupted if the scheduled duration is longer than 30 minutes
f. Product placement is not allowed in children's programs.
g. The Member States and the Commission should encourage audiovisual media service providers to develop codes of conduct regarding the advertising of certain foods in children's programs.

Note that criterion (b) explicitly outlaws appeals to "pester power".

In Australia, there are multiple governing bodies that deal with the legislation of advertising to children. Some of the governing bodies are the Advertising Standards Board, which is appointed by the Advertising Standards Bureau, and Communications Council. Citation "This Code has been adopted by the AANA as part of advertising and marketing self-regulation. The object of this Code is to ensure that advertisers and marketers develop and maintain a high sense of social responsibility in advertising and marketing to children in Australia." (AANA, 2009) The Children's Television Standards (CTS) were implemented in 1990 by the Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (ABT). This was in an attempt to balance:

In the United States, advertisements marketed to children (effectively linked to the same regulations which prohibited program-length advertising) were limited between 1946 and 1983. [57] With the Children's Television Act, which was introduced in 1990 and strengthened in August 1996, legislation once again became stricter. [58]

In Brazil, through interpretation of the Federal Constitution, and bounded by the Statute of the Child and Adolescent (ECA) and the Consumer Protection Code (CDC), any advertising directed towards children is prohibited. [59] This falls under Article 227 of the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil, which states "It is the duty of the family, the society and the State to ensure children and adolescents, with absolute priority, the right to life, health, nourishment, education, leisure, professional training, culture, dignity, respect, freedom and family and community life, as well as to guard them from all forms of negligence, discrimination, exploitation, violence, cruelty and oppression." [60]

Advertising standards

In many countries, advertising is also governed by self-regulatory codes of conduct. Advertisers, advertising agencies and the media agree on a code of advertising standards enforced by a self-regulatory organization. [61] At a minimum, the general aim of self-regulatory codes is to ensure that any advertising is 'legal, decent, honest and truthful, but in most countries, detailed rules are in place for different advertising techniques and sectors.

On a global level, the International Chamber of Commerce has drafted a global code on marketing communications. [62] All forms of marketing communications worldwide must conform to the ICC Consolidated Code on Advertising and Marketing. [63] The code includes a specific section, detailing the special care needed when communicating with children.

Since 2006, a global code of practice on food marketing communications is also in place. The Framework for Responsible Food and Beverage Marketing Communications of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) [64] sets down global requirements for food and beverage marketing communications on all media, including the Internet. [65]

Many countries have implemented self-regulatory provisions that use the ICC Framework as a basis, but go further in several respects, depending on local considerations. Examples include Australia, [66] Brazil, [67] Canada, [68] Chile, [69] France, [70] Ireland, [71] The Netherlands, [72] New Zealand, [73] Spain, [74] the UK [75] and the USA. [76]

In the United States, the Children's Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus (CBBB) established in 1974 by the National Advertising Review Council (NARC) runs a self-regulatory program that includes a prescreening service for advertisers to ensure they are in compliance with COPPA and the CARU guidelines.

In addition to industry-wide self-regulation, individual companies and industry sectors have introduced a wide range of additional provisions relating to marketing communications directed at children. For example, most multinational food and beverage companies have developed their own policies on food and beverage marketing communications to children, and have announced the joint implementation of these individual commitments.

In July 2007, ten companies announced a common pledge in the US—the Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative, [77] mirroring a similar initiative by 15 companies in Canada—the Canadian Children's Food & Beverage Advertising Initiative; [68] and followed by 11 companies in Europe with the EU Pledge. [78] Under these initiatives, participating companies will cease advertising to children under 12, other than products that meet specific nutritional guidelines, based on international scientific recommendations. A similar program was launched by leading food companies in Thailand in May 2008 and in Australia in mid-2009. [79]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Advertising</span> Form of communication for marketing

Advertising is the practice and techniques employed to bring attention to a product or service. Advertising aims to put a product or service in the spotlight in hopes of drawing it attention from consumers. It is typically used to promote a specific good or service, but there are wide range of uses, the most common being the commercial advertisement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Junk food</span> Unhealthy food high in sugar or fat

"Junk food" is a term used to describe food that is high in calories from sugar and/or fat, and possibly sodium, making it hyperpalatable, but with little dietary fiber, protein, vitamins, minerals, or other important forms of nutritional value. It is also known as HFSS food. The term junk food is a pejorative dating back to the 1950s. Many variations of junk food can be easily found in most supermarkets and fast food restaurants. Due to easy accessibility, commercially-oriented packaging, and often-low prices, people are most likely to consume it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alcohol advertising</span> Promotion of alcoholic beverages

Alcohol advertising is the promotion of alcoholic beverages by alcohol producers through a variety of media. Along with nicotine advertising, alcohol advertising is one of the most highly regulated forms of marketing. Some or all forms of alcohol advertising are banned in some countries. There have been some important studies about alcohol advertising published, such as J.P. Nelson's in 2000.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Committee of Advertising Practice</span> Advertising regulation authority in the United Kingdom

The Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP) is a British organisation responsible for the UK Code of Non-Broadcast Advertising, Sales Promotion and Direct Marketing, which is the main code of practice for self-regulation of the non-broadcast advertising industry in the UK.

The Rudd Center for Food Policy and Health, formerly named the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, is a non-profit research and public policy organization that promotes solutions to food insecurity, poor diet quality, and weight bias. Located in Hartford, Connecticut at The University of Connecticut, the Rudd Center was co-founded in March 2005 at Yale University by benefactor Leslie Rudd and Kelly D. Brownell. The Rudd Center moved from Yale to the University of Connecticut in December 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fast food advertising</span> Promotion for fast food

Fast food advertising promotes fast food products and utilizes numerous aspects to reach out to the public.

BBB National Programs, an independent non-profit organization that oversees more than a dozen national industry self-regulation programs that provide third-party accountability and dispute resolution services to companies, including outside and in-house counsel, consumers, and others in arenas such as privacy, advertising, data collection, child-directed marketing, and more. The Center for Industry Self-Regulation (CISR) is BBB National Programs' 501(c)(3) non-profit foundation. CISR supports responsible business leaders in developing fair, future-proof best practices, and the education of the public on the conditions necessary for industry self-regulation.

Marketing ethics is an area of applied ethics which deals with the moral principles behind the operation and regulation of marketing. Some areas of marketing ethics overlap with media and public relations ethics.

Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) refers to the marketing and advertising of pharmaceutical products directly to consumers as patients, as opposed to specifically targeting health professionals. The term is synonymous primarily with the advertising of prescription medicines via mass media platforms—most commonly on television and in magazines, but also via online platforms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Food marketing</span> Promotion of food for sale

Food marketing is the marketing of food products. It brings together the food producer and the consumer through a chain of marketing activities.

"Youth Marketing" is a term used in the marketing and advertising industry to describe activities to communicate with young people, typically in the age range of 11 to 35. More specifically, there is teen marketing, targeting people age 11 to 17, college marketing, targeting college-age consumers, typically ages 18 to 24, and young adult marketing, targeting ages 25 to 34.

Toy advertising is the promotion of toys through a variety of media. Advertising campaigns for toys have been criticized for trading on children's naivete and for turning children into premature consumers. Advertising to children is usually regulated to ensure that it meets defined standards of honesty and decency. These rules vary from country to country, with some going as far as banning all advertisements that are directed at children.

Ad Standards manages the complaint resolution process of the advertising self-regulation system in Australia.

Advertising is a form of selling a product to a certain audience in which communication is intended to persuade an audience to purchase products, ideals or services regardless of whether they want or need them. While advertising can be seen as a way to inform the audience about a certain product or idea it also comes with a cost because the sellers have to find a way to show the seller interest in their product. It is not without social costs. Unsolicited commercial email and other forms of spam have become so prevalent that they are a major nuisance to internet users, as well as being a financial burden on internet service providers. Advertising increasingly invades public spaces, such as schools, which some critics argue is a form of child exploitation. Advertising frequently uses psychological pressure on the intended consumer, which may be harmful. As a result of these criticisms, the advertising industry has seen low approval rates in surveys and negative cultural portrayals.

"Pester power", or "the nag factor", as the phenomenon is known in U.S. literature, is the "tendency of children, who are bombarded with marketers' messages, to unrelentingly request advertised items". The phrase is used to describe the negative connotations of children's influence in their parents' buying habits.

The United States food and beverage industry has increased the amount of advertising that intensively and aggressively targets children through multiple channels. Food marketers know that the youth consumers have equal if not more spending power than adults, they hold purchasing influence, and have the potential to be lifelong consumers. The advertisements for products predominantly high in sugar and fat have increased and have had an effect on the major health epidemic in the US of Childhood obesity, and as such are inconsistent with national dietary recommendations. Food advertisements have moved from the television into the classroom. Marketing companies are exploring new creative techniques to reach their target audience, young children, through promotions, contests, and incentive programs. As a result, the US has progressively been placing regulations on how much advertising is allowed during children's programming.

Childhood obesity is defined as a body mass index (BMI) at or above the 96th percentile for children of the same age and sex. It can cause a variety of health problems, including high blood pressure, high cholesterol, heart disease, diabetes, breathing problems, sleeping problems, and joint problems later in life. Children who are obese are at a greater risk for social and psychological problems as well, such as peer victimization, increased levels of aggression, and low self-esteem. Many environmental and social factors have been shown to correlate with childhood obesity, and researchers are attempting to use this knowledge to help prevent and treat the condition. When implemented early, certain forms of behavioral and psychological treatment can help children regain and/or maintain a healthy weight.

Advertisements in schools is a controversial issue that is debated in the United States. Naming rights of sports stadiums and fields, sponsorship of sports teams, placement of signage, vending machine product selection and placement, and free products that children can take home or keep at school are all prominent forms of advertisements in schools.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Food labelling and advertising law (Chile)</span> Food labeling and advertising law in Chile (2016)

Chile's food labelling and advertising law, formally titled Ley 20.606, sobre la composición de los alimentos y su publicidad establishes a regulatory framework on food security and healthy food with the intention of guiding consumers towards behaviour patterns that promote public health. After the 2012 law was enacted, its accompanying regulations came into full force on June 27, 2016. Andrew Jacobs, writing for The New York Times, has characterized this measure as "the world’s most ambitious attempt to remake a country’s food culture" and suggests it "could be a model for how to turn the tide on a global obesity epidemic that researchers say contributes to four million premature deaths a year."

TV advertisements by country refers to how television advertisements vary in different countries and regions.

References

  1. "Early Childhood Care and Education". Education. UNESCO. 29 September 2015.
  2. Valkenburg, Patti M.; Cantor, Joanne (January–February 2001). "The development of a child into a consumer". Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 22 (1): 61–72. doi:10.1016/S0193-3973(00)00066-6.
  3. "Advertising and Children".
  4. Olson, Erik L.; Thjømøe, Hans Mathias (2012). "The relative performance of TV sponsorship versus television spot advertising". European Journal of Marketing. 46 (11/12): 1726–1742. doi:10.1108/03090561211260068. hdl: 11250/93846 .
  5. Holz, Jo (2017). Kids' TV Grows Up: The Path from Howdy Doody to SpongeBob. Jefferson, NC: McFarland. pp. 50–52, 69–71, 94–95, 116–117, 133–135, 169–170. ISBN   978-1-4766-6874-1.
  6. Blades, M., Oates, C., & Blumberg, F. (2014). Advertising to children: New directions, new media. Retrieved from http://www.eblib.com
  7. Rice, Lynette (8 June 2007). "Bob Barker on saying goodbye to The Price Is Right". Entertainment Weekly . Retrieved 30 April 2016.
  8. Jacob Klein (5 September 2016). "Streamade TV-tjänster räddar barn från 150 timmar reklam per år". Report: Netflix Saves Children from 150 Hours of Commercials a Year. Retrieved 18 February 2017.
  9. "Television (TV) and Children: Your Child: University of Michigan Health System". www.med.umich.edu. Retrieved 1 April 2016.
  10. Moore, E. S.; Lutz, R. J. (1 January 2000). "Children, Advertising, and Product Experiences: A Multimethod Inquiry". Journal of Consumer Research. 27 (1): 31–48. doi:10.1086/314307. JSTOR   314307.
  11. 1 2 Johnson, Fern; Young, Karren (November 2002). "Gendered voices in children's television advertising". Critical Studies in Media Communication. 19 (4): 461–480. doi:10.1080/07393180216572. ISSN   1529-5036. S2CID   18747727.
  12. 1 2 3 Moore, E. S. & Lutz, R. J. (2000). "Children, Advertising, and Product Experiences: A Multimethod Inquiry". Journal of Consumer Research. 27 (1): 31–48. doi:10.1086/314307.
  13. Merrie Brucks; Marvin E. Goldberg; Gary M. Armstrong (1986). "Children's Cognitive Responses to Advertising". Advances in Consumer Research. 13: 650–654.
  14. "PsycNET". psycnet.apa.org. Retrieved 14 December 2017.
  15. Advertising Standards Authority. "Code for Advertising to Children – ASA – Advertising Standards Authority". ASA – Advertising Standards Authority. Archived from the original on 1 April 2016. Retrieved 2 April 2016.
  16. Goldberg, Marvin; Gorn, Gerald (1978). "Some Unintended Consequences of TV Advertising to Children". Journal of Consumer Research. 5 (1): 22. doi:10.1086/208710.
  17. Hardman, Jeremy (1998). "Advertising to Children: According to a new report,little children are far from vulnerable when it comes to advertising". Admap.
  18. Gunter, B.; Oates, C. & Blades, M. (2005). Advertising to Children on TV: Content, Impact and Regulation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 1–4106–1124–8.
  19. Carruthers, Brian (2016). "Television vs digital: the battle for children's (and mums') attention". Event Reports: MRS Kids and Youth Research Conference.
  20. "Advertising and Children". apa.org. Retrieved 19 February 2020.
  21. Gunter, Barrie; Oates, Caroline; Blumberg, Fran; Blades, Mark (2014). "Introduction". In Blades, Mark; Oates, Caroline; Blumberg, Fran; Gunter, Barrie (eds.). Advertising to Children. London: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 7–9. ISBN   978-1-349-32170-4.
  22. Suggett, Paul. "How Advertisers Target Children to Increase Sales". The Balance Careers. Retrieved 20 February 2020.
  23. "How to Develop Sales Executives", How to Increase Executive Effectiveness, Harvard University Press, pp. 57–69, 31 December 1953, doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674594753.c7, ISBN   978-0-674-59475-3 , retrieved 8 November 2020
  24. 1 2 3 "Celebrity Endorsement: Impact of Celebrity Endorsement on Kids". indiatimes.com. 29 March 2013. Retrieved 20 February 2020.
  25. Lavuri, Rambabu; Aileni, Vidyadhar Reddy (4 July 2022). "TV Advertisements: Assessing the Moderating Effect of Children's Pester Power on Parents Purchase Decision". Journal of Promotion Management. 28 (5): 625–649. doi:10.1080/10496491.2021.2009613. ISSN   1049-6491.
  26. Emond, Jennifer A.; Longacre, Meghan R.; Drake, Keith M.; Titus, Linda J.; Hendricks, Kristy; MacKenzie, Todd; Harris, Jennifer L.; Carroll, Jennifer E.; Cleveland, Lauren P.; Gaynor, Kelly; Dalton, Madeline A. (1 September 2019). "Influence of child-targeted fast food TV advertising exposure on fast food intake: A longitudinal study of preschool-age children". Appetite. 140: 134–141. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.05.012. ISSN   0195-6663. PMC   6691970 . PMID   31078700.
  27. "The Ethics Behind Advertising To Children". The Odyssey Online. 25 April 2016. Retrieved 22 February 2020.
  28. Adams, S. H. (August 2010). "Public Health and Public Hysteria". American Journal of Public Health. 100 (8): 1388–1391. doi:10.2105/ajph.100.8.1388. ISSN   0090-0036. PMC   2901277 . PMID   20622175.
  29. Russell, Simon J.; Croker, Helen; Viner, Russell M. (21 December 2018). "The effect of screen advertising on children's dietary intake: A systematic review and meta-analysis". Obesity Reviews. 20 (4): 554–568. doi:10.1111/obr.12812. PMC   6446725 . PMID   30576057.
  30. 1 2 Packer, Jessica; Croker, Helen; Goddings, Anne-Lise; Boyland, Emma J.; Stansfield, Claire; Russell, Simon J.; Viner, Russell M. (1 December 2022). "Advertising and Young People's Critical Reasoning Abilities: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis". Pediatrics. 150 (6): e2022057780. doi:10.1542/peds.2022-057780. ISSN   0031-4005. PMC   9724173 . PMID   36377381.
  31. 1 2 Desrochers, D. M.; Holt, D. J. (2007). "Children's Exposure to Television Advertising: Implications for Childhood Obesity". Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. 26 (2): 182–201. doi:10.1509/jppm.26.2.182. S2CID   153852021.
  32. Story, Mary; French, Simone (10 February 2004). "Food Advertising and Marketing Directed at Little Children and High Children and in the US". The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 1 (1): 3. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-1-3 . ISSN   1479-5868. PMC   416565 . PMID   15171786.
  33. "Obesity Prevention | Healthy Schools | CDC". www.cdc.gov. Retrieved 1 April 2016.
  34. Anderson, Sarah. "Childhood obesity: It's not the amount of TV, it's the number of junk food commercials". UCLA Newsroom. Archived from the original on 19 April 2016. Retrieved 1 April 2016.
  35. "Child nutrition | Television (TV) and TV Advertisement Influences on Children's Eating Behaviour | Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development". Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development. September 2013. Retrieved 1 April 2016.
  36. Harris, Jennifer L.; Bargh, John A. (12 November 2009). "Television Viewing and Unhealthy Diet: Implications for Children and Media Interventions". Health Communication. 24 (7): 660–673. doi:10.1080/10410230903242267. ISSN   1041-0236. PMC   2829711 . PMID   20183373.
  37. Kelly, B.; Hattersley, L.; King, L.; Flood, V. (2008). "Persuasive food marketing to children: use of cartoons and competitions in Australian commercial television advertisements". Health Promotion International. 23 (4): 337–344. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan023 . PMID   18755740.
  38. Rose, G. M.; Merchant, A.; Bakir, A. (2012). "Fantasy in Food Advertising Targeted at Children". Journal of Advertising. 41 (3): 75–90. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367410305. S2CID   146744915.
  39. Kelly, B.; Halford, J.; Boyland, E.; Chapman, K.; Bautista-Castaño, I.; Berg, C.; Serra-Majem, L. (2010). "Television food advertising to children: a global perspective". American Journal of Public Health. 100 (9): 1730–1736. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.179267. PMC   2920955 . PMID   20634464.
  40. Boynton-Jarrett, R.; Thomas, T.; Peterson, K.; Wiecha, J.; Sobol, A.; Gortmaker, S. (2003). "Impact of television viewing patterns on fruit and vegetable consumption among adolescents". Pediatrics. 112 (6): 1321–1326. doi:10.1542/peds.112.6.1321. PMID   14654604.
  41. Boyland, Emma J.; Halford, Jason C. G. (1 March 2013). "Television advertising and branding. Effects on eating behaviour and food preferences in children". Appetite. Marketing to Children – Implications for Eating Behaviour and Obesity: A special issue with the UK Association for the Study of Obesity (ASO). 62: 236–241. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2012.01.032. PMID   22421053. S2CID   27635045.
  42. "UK'S RESTRICTIONS ON JUNK FOOD ADVERTISING TO CHILDREN" (PDF). July 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 May 2021.
  43. 1 2 3 Potvin Kent, M; Wanless, A (2014). "The influence of the Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative: change in children's exposure to food advertising on television in Canada between 2006–2009". International Journal of Obesity. 38 (4): 558–562. doi:10.1038/ijo.2014.4. PMID   24418894. S2CID   5159894.
  44. "Child nutrition | Television (TV) and TV Advertisement Influences on Children's Eating Behaviour | Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development". Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development. September 2013. Retrieved 30 March 2016.
  45. Kelly, Bridget; Hebden, Lana; King, Lesley; Xiao, Yang; Yu, Yang; He, Gengsheng; Li, Liangli; Zeng, Lingxia; Hadi, Hamam; Karupaiah, Tilakavati; Hoe, NG See (1 March 2016). "Children's exposure to food advertising on free-to-air television: an Asia-Pacific perspective". Health Promotion International. 31 (1): 144–152. doi:10.1093/heapro/dau055. ISSN   0957-4824. PMID   24997194.
  46. Hunter, Beatrice Trum (March 2002). "Marketing Foods to kids: using fun to sell; the appeal of crazy colors, flavors, and more". Consumers' Research Magazine. 85 (3): 16 via Gale Academic OneFile.
  47. Hebden, L. A.; King, L.; Grunseit, A.; Kelly, B.; Chapman, K. (2011). "Advertising of fast food to children on Australian television: The impact of industry self-regulation". The Medical Journal of Australia. 195 (1): 20–24. doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03182.x. PMID   21728936. S2CID   196335969.
  48. "Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative".
  49. Harris, J. L.; LoDolce, M.; Dembek, C.; Schwartz, M. B. (2015). "Sweet promises: Candy advertising to children and implications for industry self-regulation". Appetite. 95: 585–592. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.07.028. PMID   26232330. S2CID   6530016.
  50. "Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD)". 26 February 2013.
  51. European Commission. (2010.). Audiovisual Media Services Directive. Retrieved 1 April 2016, from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/audiovisual-commercial-communications-avmsd
  52. Del Valle, A. G. (2013). "A Reflection on European Regulation of Television Advertising to Children". Communication Research Trends. 32 (2): 19–26.
  53. "PPU.org.uk". PPU.org.uk. Retrieved 23 August 2010.
  54. "Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD):What's new ?". Regulatory Framework. European Commission. 15 April 2010. Retrieved 6 January 2012.
  55. "Television broadcast activities: "Television without Frontiers" (TVWF) Directive". Europa: Summaries of EU legislation. European Union.
  56. "Television Advertising to Children" (PDF). Australian Communications and Media Authority. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 June 2009.
  57. Martin Goodman (12 October 2010). "Dr. Toon: When Reagan Met Optimus Prime". Animation World Network. Retrieved 18 February 2017.
  58. "Quality Television for Children". The New York Times. 16 August 1996. Retrieved 18 February 2017.
  59. "Why Advertising is Bad for Children" (PDF). Alana Foundation. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  60. "Constitution of The Federative Republic of Brazil 3rd Edition" (PDF). Chamber of Deputies, Documentation and Information Center: 151. 2010.
  61. "EC.europa.eu". Europa (web portal). Retrieved 6 January 2012.
  62. "ICC Consolidated Code on Advertising and Marketing". Last revised in September 2011.
  63. Consolidated ICC Code. Last revised in September 2011.
  64. ICC Framework for Responsible Food and Beverage Marketing Communication Archived 14 August 2014 at the Wayback Machine The code covers any paid marketing communication using the following vehicles: telephone, TV, radio, press, cinema, Internet, DVD/CD-ROM, direct marketing, outdoor marketing, sales promotions and sponsorship.
  65. The new code covers marketing communications in the following areas: sales promotion, sponsorship, direct marketing, digital media and environmental marketing claims.
  66. AANA.com Archived 14 August 2009 at the Wayback Machine , Australian Online Behavioural Advertising Guidelines
  67. "Conar.org.br". Conar.org.br. Retrieved 6 January 2012.
  68. 1 2 "FCPMC.com" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 December 2011. Retrieved 6 January 2012.
  69. "Conar.cl" (in Spanish). Conar.cl. 14 December 2011. Retrieved 6 January 2012.
  70. BVP.org Archived 22 September 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  71. "ASAI.ie". ASAI.ie. 1 January 2007. Archived from the original on 13 January 2012. Retrieved 6 January 2012.
  72. "Reclamecode.nl". Reclamecode.nl. Retrieved 6 January 2012.
  73. "ASA.co.nz". ASA.co.nz. Archived from the original on 2 January 2012. Retrieved 6 January 2012.
  74. "Self-regulatory code of food advertising aimed at minors, obesity prevention and health" (PDF). 7 October 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 October 2006.
  75. "ASA.org.uk". Archived from the original on 3 August 2009. Retrieved 23 July 2009.
  76. "CARU.org". CARU.org. Retrieved 6 January 2012.
  77. "US.bbb.org". US.bbb.org. Retrieved 6 January 2012.
  78. "EU-pledge.eu". EU-pledge.eu. Retrieved 6 January 2012.
  79. "AFGC.org.au". Archived from the original on 15 October 2009.