Elbridge Colby | |
---|---|
Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Presumptive nominee | |
Assuming office TBD | |
President | Donald Trump (elect) |
Succeeding | Amanda J. Dory |
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy and Force Development | |
In office 2017–2018 | |
Personal details | |
Born | Elbridge Andrew Colby [1] December 30,1979 |
Political party | Republican |
Relatives | William Colby (grandfather) |
Education | Harvard University (BA) Yale University (JD) |
Elbridge A. Colby (born December 30,1979) is an American national security policy professional who served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy and Force Development from 2017 to 2018 during the Trump administration. He played a key role in the development of the 2018 U.S. National Defense Strategy,which,among other things,shifted the U.S. Defense Department's focus to challenges posed by China's rise.
In June 2018,Colby was appointed as Director of the Defense Program at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS). In 2019 he co-founded The Marathon Initiative with Wess Mitchell. In December 2024,President-elect Trump nominated Colby to serve as the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy.
Colby graduated from Harvard College in 2002,and from Yale Law School in 2009. [2] [3] His early career included over five years of service with the Department of Defense,the Department of State,and in the Intelligence Community,including a period of service with the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq in 2003. [2] [4] Colby also served in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence during its stand-up in 2005–2006. [4]
From 2010 to 2013,Colby worked as an analyst at CNA,a federally funded nonprofit research and analysis organization. From 2014 to 2017,Colby was the Robert M. Gates fellow at the Center for a New American Security. [5] In 2015,Colby was considered for a top job in Jeb Bush's 2016 presidential campaign,but was not hired after "prominent,interventionist neoconservatives" objected. [3] [6]
In May 2017,Colby was appointed the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy and Force Development,a role in which he served into 2018. [3] In this role,Colby was responsible for defense strategy,force development,and strategic analysis for policy for the Secretary of Defense. [2] Colby served as the primary Defense Department representative in the development of the 2017 National Security Strategy. [7]
While Deputy Assistant Secretary,Colby served as the lead official in the development and rollout of the department's strategic planning guidance,the 2018 National Defense Strategy (NDS). The NDS posited:"Inter-state strategic competition,not terrorism,is now the primary concern in U.S. national security," and "the central challenge to U.S. prosperity and security is the reemergence of long-term strategic competition," primarily from China and Russia. [8] Going further,Colby said the "central challenge facing the department of defense and the joint force [is] the erosion of U.S. military advantage vis a vis China and Russia." [9]
Politico reported that in re-orienting American defense resources away from the Middle East and towards China,Colby faced considerable bureaucratic infighting from U.S. Central Command and the Joint Staff,but received support from the Air Force and the Navy. [3]
After leaving the Department of Defense in 2018,Colby returned to the Center for a New American Security (CNAS),where he continued to work on defense issues until 2019. [10] He then launched The Marathon Initiative,a think tank devoted to developing strategies for the US to compete with global rivals. [3] [7] [11]
In 2021,Colby expanded on his views in his first book,The Strategy of Denial:American Defense in an Age of Great Power Conflict,which The Wall Street Journal named a Ten Best Book of 2021. [3] [12]
On December 22,2024,President-elect Trump nominated Colby to serve as the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy for his second term as president. [13]
Colby identifies as a realist. He believes that China is the principal threat faced by the United States,and that Asia should be the priority of U.S. efforts and resources. [14] He advocates for the U.S. to shift its military planning and resources to prepare for a conflict over Taiwan,and supports bolstering U.S. industrial capacity. [3] [14] In a Time article he co-authored with Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts,Colby wrote that:"[W]e need to be absolutely clear:Without question,the top external threat to America is China—by far." [15] He is a "prioritizer",believing the U.S. to have limited military resources,and thus supporting a reorientation of U.S. military resources away from the Middle East and Europe to Asia and China. [16] Foreign Policy describes him as "the loudest and perhaps most cogent voice in Washington advocating a complete shift away from Europe,NATO,and Russia and toward the growing challenge from China". [17]
Colby believes China is seeking regional hegemony over Asia,which he believes to be the world's most important region,and will achieve that goal if not stopped by the U.S. He says that if China is allowed to dominate Asia,it would severely diminish America's future prospects and freedom of action,push the American economy down the value chain,and lead the U.S. less resistant to Chinese pressure. [14] [17] He believes the best way China would achieve regional hegemony would be by attacking a U.S. ally or quasi-ally,which he identifies as Taiwan. He advocates for a "strategy of denial" to deny regional hegemony to China and stopping or defeating a potential invasion of Taiwan. He believes the best way China would achieve this would be by attacking a U.S. ally or quasi-ally,which he identifies as Taiwan. He believes an attack on Taiwan would lead to a "limited war" which would seek to cause the least upheaval in the region,with no motivation on either side to escalate;he calls on the U.S. to prepare for this scenario. He further calls for a "anti-hegemonic coalition" made up of U.S. allies in Asia to stop China from taking over Taiwan;he believes if the coalition failed to stop a takeover of Taiwan,China could next seize the Philippines and Vietnam. He also advocates for an end to U.S. policy of strategic ambiguity on Taiwan. [14] [18]
Despite his reputation as a China hawk,he does not describe the Chinese Communist Party or Chinese leader Xi Jinping as "evil" and rejects "cartoonish account" of China as "unstoppably rapacious",believing China to be a "rising power" with "a rational interest in expanding their sphere and believing themselves to be aggrieved and put upon". He supports treating China with respect and a "strong shield of disincentive",continuing by saying that his policy is "status quo. My strategy is not designed to suppress or humiliate China…I believe China could achieve a reasonable conception of the rejuvenation of the great Chinese nation,consistent with the achievement of my strategy. If you put all that together,that looks like somebody who is advocating for peace based on a realistic reading of the world." [14] He also believes the U.S. should not seek to change China's internal politics or ideological system as long as China does not seek regional hegemony. [18]
Colby supports deprioritizing North Korea,telling Yonhap News Agency in May 2024 that the "fundamental fact is that North Korea is not a primary threat to the U.S." and it "would not be rational to lose multiple American cities to just deal with North Korea". [19] He called on South Korea to take "overwhelming responsibility" for its own defense against North Korea,with the U.S. getting involved only if China gets involved. He also said United States Forces Korea should be focused on protecting South Korea from possible Chinese attacks instead of being "held hostage to dealing with the North Korean problem". He supports transferring wartime operational control from the U.S. to South Korea,while signaling his openness to South Korea acquiring nuclear weapons. He said the denuclearization of North Korea was an "impossibly far-fetched" idea,instead calling to focus on more "attainable" goals such as arms control focused on limiting the range of North Korean intercontinental ballistic missiles. [20] He advocates Japan to spend more on its military,telling The Nikkei in September 2024 that Japan should 3% of its GDP on military. [21]
Colby believes aiding Ukraine during the Russian invasion of Ukraine jeopardizes America's focus to China,and this reality necessarily means America must prioritize investment of attention and resources on China,including a reduction in support for Ukraine. In 2023,he told Politico that "Ukraine should not be the focus. The best way to avoid war with China is to be manifestly prepared such that Beijing recognizes that an attack on Taiwan is likely to fail. We need to be a hawk to get to a place where we can be a dove. It’s about a balance of power". [3] Colby later wrote that "it is in America's interest to avoid [Ukrainian defeat],but we must pursue that interest in a manner consistent with our highest priority of restoring a formidable denial defense along Asia’s first island chain." [22] He rejects Ukraine's membership to NATO. [23] Colby instead supports European countries to commit more resources on countering Russia and bolstering their militaries,allowing the U.S. to shift its resources on Asia. [14] He believes European NATO members should spend around 3 to 4 percent of their GDP on defense and says the U.S. should be "prepared to use carrots and sticks to incentivize the right kind of behavior from our point of view" in regards to European countries. [24]
Colby supports a reduction of U.S. military presence in the Middle East,a region which he described as "relatively unimportant" from a geopolitical standpoint. He supports withdrawing the U.S. military from the Persian Gulf,arguing the U.S. can counter Iran "more efficiently" by "bolstering the military capabilities of its partners in the region". He opposes direct military action against Iran,while arguing that containing an Iran with nuclear weapons "is an entirely plausible and practical objective. In an article written shortly before the 7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel,Colby called for a "reset" in America's relationship with Israel,saying America should "defer more to Israel's judgement about how to best manage its security challenges",and that while the US should be prepared to provide material and political support to Israel,it should understand that the US.,which "cannot afford to be enmeshed in another Middle Eastern war,will take a supporting role." He later questioned Biden administration's efforts to counter the Houthis in Yemen. [16]
The relationship between the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the United States of America (USA) has been complex and at times tense since the establishment of the PRC and the retreat of the government of the Republic of China to Taiwan in 1949. Since the normalization of relations in the 1970s,the US–China relationship has been marked by numerous perennial disputes including the political status of Taiwan,territorial disputes in the South China Sea,and more recently the treatment of Uyghurs in Xinjiang. They have significant economic ties and are significantly intertwined,yet they also have a global hegemonic great power rivalry. As of 2025,China and the United States are the world's second-largest and largest economies by nominal GDP,as well as the largest and second-largest economies by GDP (PPP) respectively. Collectively,they account for 44.2% of the global nominal GDP,and 34.7% of global PPP-adjusted GDP.
Grand strategy or high strategy is a state's strategy of how means can be used to advance and achieve national interests in the long-term. Issues of grand strategy typically include the choice of military doctrine,force structure and alliances,as well as economic relations,diplomatic behavior,and methods to extract or mobilize resources.
John Joseph Mearsheimer is an American political scientist and international relations scholar. He is the R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago.
The First Taiwan Strait Crisis was a brief armed conflict between the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of China (ROC) focused on several ROC-held islands a few miles from the Chinese mainland in the Taiwan Strait.
James Norman Mattis is an American military veteran who served as the 26th United States secretary of defense from 2017 to 2019. A retired Marine Corps four-star general,he commanded forces in the Persian Gulf War,the War in Afghanistan,and the Iraq War.
The United States under secretary of defense for policy (USDP) is a high level civilian official in the United States Department of Defense. The under secretary of defense for policy is the principal staff assistant and adviser to both the secretary of defense and the deputy secretary of defense for all matters concerning the formation of national security and defense policy.
The United States foreign policy toward the People's Republic of China originated during the Cold War. At that time,the U.S. had a containment policy against communist states. The leaked Pentagon Papers indicated the efforts by the U.S. to contain China through military actions undertaken in the Vietnam War. The containment policy centered around an island chain strategy. President Richard Nixon's China rapprochement signaled a shift in focus to gain leverage in containing the Soviet Union. Formal diplomatic ties between the U.S. and China were established in 1979,and with normalized trade relations since 2000,the U.S. and China have been linked by closer economic ties and more cordial relations. In his first term as U.S. president,Barack Obama said,"We want China to succeed and prosper. It's good for the United States if China continues on the path of development that it's on".
Michael Jonathan Green is an American Japanologist currently serving as CEO of the United States Studies Centre and senior advisor at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). He is also a member of Radio Free Asia's board of directors and Center for a New American Security (CNAS)'s board of advisors.
The Center for a New American Security (CNAS) is a think tank in Washington,D.C. specializing in United States national security issues,including terrorism,irregular warfare,the future of the U.S. military,the emergence of Asia as a global power center,war games pitting the U.S. against the People's Republic of China,and the national security implications of natural resource consumption,among others.
After the United States established diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1979 and recognized Beijing as the only legal government of China,Taiwan–United States relations became unofficial and informal following terms of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA),which allows the United States to have relations with the Taiwanese people and their government,whose name is not specified. U.S.–Taiwan relations were further informally grounded in the Six Assurances in response to the third communiquéon the establishment of US–PRC relations. The Taiwan Travel Act,passed by the U.S. Congress on March 16,2018,allows high-level U.S. officials to visit Taiwan and vice versa. Both sides have since signed a consular agreement formalizing their existent consular relations on September 13,2019. The US government removed self-imposed restrictions on executive branch contacts with Taiwan on January 9,2021.
Michael Paul Pillsbury is a foreign policy strategist,author,and former public official in the United States. He was appointed in December 2020 to be the Chair of the Defense Policy Board at the U.S. Department of Defense. He is also a senior fellow for China strategy at The Heritage Foundation and has been Director of the Center on Chinese Strategy at the Hudson Institute in Washington,D.C.,since 2014. Before Hudson,he held various postings in the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Senate. He has been called a "China-hawk",and an "architect" of Trump's policy towards China. In 2018,he was described by Donald Trump as the leading authority on the country.
Paul Thomas Haenle is an American analyst and China specialist currently serving as Maurice R. Greenberg Director’s Chair at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Marco Rubio is a Republican United States Senator from Florida. Rubio was a candidate for the Republican nomination for president of the United States in the 2016 election.
This article describes the foreign policy positions taken by Donald Trump during his 2016 presidential campaign.
U.S. foreign policy during the presidency of Donald Trump was noted for its unpredictability and reneging on prior international commitments,upending diplomatic conventions,embracing political and economic brinkmanship with most adversaries,and stronger relations with traditional allies. Trump's "America First" policy pursued nationalist foreign policy objectives and prioritized bilateral relations over multinational agreements. As president,Trump described himself as a nationalist and a globalist while espousing views that have been characterized as isolationist,non-interventionist,and protectionist,although the "isolationist" label has been disputed,including by Trump himself,and periods of his political career have been described by the alternative term "semi-isolationist." He personally praised some populist,neo-nationalist,illiberal,and authoritarian governments,while antagonizing others,even as administration diplomats nominally continued to pursue pro-democracy ideals abroad.
Aaron Wess Mitchell is an American foreign policy expert and former diplomat who was the Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs from October 2017 until February 2019. Prior to assuming the role at State Department,he was president and CEO of the Center for European Policy Analysis. On July 19,2017,President Donald Trump nominated Mitchell as Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs.
Michael George Glen Waltz is an American politician,businessman,author,and colonel in the United States Army who has served as the U.S. representative for Florida's 6th congressional district since 2019. He is a member of the Republican Party and is the first "Green Beret" to be elected to the United States Congress.
The foreign policy of the Joe Biden administration emphasizes the repair of the United States' alliances,which Biden argues were damaged during the Trump administration. The administration's goal is to restore the United States to a "position of trusted leadership" among global democracies in order to address challenges posed by Russia and China. Both Biden and his Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin have repeatedly emphasized that no other world power should be able to surpass the United States,either militarily or economically. Biden's foreign policy has been described as having ideological underpinnings in mid-twentieth century liberal internationalism,American exceptionalism,and pragmatism.
The United States Department of Defense China Task Force was announced by the United States president Joe Biden on February 10,2021. Biden said the task force would help the United States "win the competition of the future" with China. According to the DOD News service,the task force will be led by Ely Ratner,an assistant to US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin III. On the day the task force was announced,Chinese leader Xi Jinping said that China sought cooperation with the United States,but that confrontation would be "definitely catastrophic for both countries and the world."
Ivan J. Kanapathy is a retired United States Marine Corps officer and American security analyst currently serving as Vice President of Beacon Global Strategies,an adjunct professor at Georgetown University Walsh School of Foreign Service,a senior associate with the Freeman Chair in China Studies at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS),and a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Between March 2018 and July 2021,he was director for China,Taiwan,and Mongolia and deputy senior director for Asian affairs at the White House National Security Council (NSC) during the Trump and Biden administrations.