Impact crater

Last updated

Impact craters in the Solar System
Iapetus as seen by the Cassini probe - 20071008.jpg
500-kilometre-wide (310 mi) crater Engelier on Saturn's moon Iapetus
Tycho crater on the Moon.jpg
The prominent crater Tycho in the southern highlands of the Moon
Fresh impact crater HiRise 2013.jpg
Recently formed (between July 2010 and May 2012) impact crater on Mars showing a pristine ray system of ejecta [1]
Barringer Crater aerial photo by USGS.jpg
50,000-year-old Meteor Crater east of Flagstaff, Arizona, U.S. on Earth

An impact crater is a circular depression in the surface of a solid astronomical object formed by the hypervelocity impact of a smaller object. In contrast to volcanic craters, which result from explosion or internal collapse, [2] impact craters typically have raised rims and floors that are lower in elevation than the surrounding terrain. [3] Lunar impact craters range from microscopic craters on lunar rocks returned by the Apollo program [4] and small, simple, bowl-shaped depressions in the lunar regolith to large, complex, multi-ringed impact basins. Meteor Crater is a well-known example of a small impact crater on Earth. [5]


Impact craters are the dominant geographic features on many solid Solar System objects including the Moon, Mercury, Callisto, Ganymede and most small moons and asteroids. On other planets and moons that experience more active surface geological processes, such as Earth, Venus, Europa, Io and Titan, visible impact craters are less common because they become eroded, buried or transformed by tectonics over time. Where such processes have destroyed most of the original crater topography, the terms impact structure or astrobleme are more commonly used. In early literature, before the significance of impact cratering was widely recognised, the terms cryptoexplosion or cryptovolcanic structure were often used to describe what are now recognised as impact-related features on Earth. [6]

The cratering records of very old surfaces, such as Mercury, the Moon, and the southern highlands of Mars, record a period of intense early bombardment in the inner Solar System around 3.9 billion years ago. The rate of crater production on Earth has since been considerably lower, but it is appreciable nonetheless. Earth experiences, on average, from one to three impacts large enough to produce a 20-kilometre-diameter (12 mi) crater every million years. [7] [8] This indicates that there should be far more relatively young craters on the planet than have been discovered so far. The cratering rate in the inner solar system fluctuates as a consequence of collisions in the asteroid belt that create a family of fragments that are often sent cascading into the inner solar system. [9] Formed in a collision 80 million years ago, the Baptistina family of asteroids is thought to have caused a large spike in the impact rate. The rate of impact cratering in the outer Solar System could be different from the inner Solar System. [10]

Although Earth's active surface processes quickly destroy the impact record, about 190 terrestrial impact craters have been identified. [11] These range in diameter from a few tens of meters up to about 300 km (190 mi), and they range in age from recent times (e.g. the Sikhote-Alin craters in Russia whose creation was witnessed in 1947) to more than two billion years, though most are less than 500 million years old because geological processes tend to obliterate older craters. They are also selectively found in the stable interior regions of continents. [12] Few undersea craters have been discovered because of the difficulty of surveying the sea floor, the rapid rate of change of the ocean bottom, and the subduction of the ocean floor into Earth's interior by processes of plate tectonics.

Impact craters are not to be confused with landforms that may appear similar, including calderas, sinkholes, glacial cirques, ring dikes, salt domes, and others.


Daniel M. Barringer, a mining engineer, was convinced already in 1903 that the crater he owned, Meteor Crater, was of cosmic origin. Most geologists at the time assumed it formed as the result of a volcanic steam eruption. [13] :41–42

Eugene Shoemaker, pioneer impact crater researcher, here at a crystallographic microscope used to examine meteorites Eugene Shoemaker.jpg
Eugene Shoemaker, pioneer impact crater researcher, here at a crystallographic microscope used to examine meteorites

In the 1920s, the American geologist Walter H. Bucher studied a number of sites now recognized as impact craters in the United States. He concluded they had been created by some great explosive event, but believed that this force was probably volcanic in origin. However, in 1936, the geologists John D. Boon and Claude C. Albritton Jr. revisited Bucher's studies and concluded that the craters that he studied were probably formed by impacts. [14]

Grove Karl Gilbert suggested in 1893 that the Moon's craters were formed by large asteroid impacts. Ralph Baldwin in 1949 wrote that the Moon's craters were mostly of impact origin. Around 1960, Gene Shoemaker revived the idea. According to David H. Levy, Shoemaker "saw the craters on the Moon as logical impact sites that were formed not gradually, in eons, but explosively, in seconds." For his PhD degree at Princeton University (1960), under the guidance of Harry Hammond Hess, Shoemaker studied the impact dynamics of Meteor Crater. Shoemaker noted that Meteor Crater had the same form and structure as two explosion craters created from atomic bomb tests at the Nevada Test Site, notably Jangle U in 1951 and Teapot Ess in 1955. In 1960, Edward C. T. Chao and Shoemaker identified coesite (a form of silicon dioxide) at Meteor Crater, proving the crater was formed from an impact generating extremely high temperatures and pressures. They followed this discovery with the identification of coesite within suevite at Nördlinger Ries, proving its impact origin. [13]

Armed with the knowledge of shock-metamorphic features, Carlyle S. Beals and colleagues at the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada and Wolf von Engelhardt of the University of Tübingen in Germany began a methodical search for impact craters. By 1970, they had tentatively identified more than 50. Although their work was controversial, the American Apollo Moon landings, which were in progress at the time, provided supportive evidence by recognizing the rate of impact cratering on the Moon. [15] Because the processes of erosion on the Moon are minimal, craters persist. Since the Earth could be expected to have roughly the same cratering rate as the Moon, it became clear that the Earth had suffered far more impacts than could be seen by counting evident craters.

Crater formation

A laboratory simulation of an impact event and crater formation

Impact cratering involves high velocity collisions between solid objects, typically much greater than the speed of sound in those objects. Such hyper-velocity impacts produce physical effects such as melting and vaporization that do not occur in familiar sub-sonic collisions. On Earth, ignoring the slowing effects of travel through the atmosphere, the lowest impact velocity with an object from space is equal to the gravitational escape velocity of about 11 km/s. The fastest impacts occur at about 72 km/s [16] in the "worst case" scenario in which an object in a retrograde near-parabolic orbit hits Earth. The median impact velocity on Earth is about 20 km/s. [17]

However, the slowing effects of travel through the atmosphere rapidly decelerate any potential impactor, especially in the lowest 12 kilometres where 90% of the earth's atmospheric mass lies. Meteorites of up to 7,000 kg lose all their cosmic velocity due to atmospheric drag at a certain altitude (retardation point), and start to accelerate again due to Earth's gravity until the body reaches its terminal velocity of 0.09 to 0.16 km/s. [16] The larger the meteoroid (i.e. asteroids and comets) the more of its initial cosmic velocity it preserves. While an object of 9,000 kg maintains about 6% of its original velocity, one of 900,000 kg already preserves about 70%. Extremely large bodies (about 100,000 tonnes) are not slowed by the atmosphere at all, and impact with their initial cosmic velocity if no prior disintegration occurs. [16]

Impacts at these high speeds produce shock waves in solid materials, and both impactor and the material impacted are rapidly compressed to high density. Following initial compression, the high-density, over-compressed region rapidly depressurizes, exploding violently, to set in train the sequence of events that produces the impact crater. Impact-crater formation is therefore more closely analogous to cratering by high explosives than by mechanical displacement. Indeed, the energy density of some material involved in the formation of impact craters is many times higher than that generated by high explosives. Since craters are caused by explosions, they are nearly always circular – only very low-angle impacts cause significantly elliptical craters. [18]

This describes impacts on solid surfaces. Impacts on porous surfaces, such as that of Hyperion, may produce internal compression without ejecta, punching a hole in the surface without filling in nearby craters. This may explain the 'sponge-like' appearance of that moon. [19]

It is convenient to divide the impact process conceptually into three distinct stages: (1) initial contact and compression, (2) excavation, (3) modification and collapse. In practice, there is overlap between the three processes with, for example, the excavation of the crater continuing in some regions while modification and collapse is already underway in others.

Contact and compression

Nested Craters on Mars, 40.104deg N, 125.005deg E. These nested craters are probably caused by changes in the strength of the target material. This usually happens when a weaker material overlies a stronger material. Nested Craters on Mars.jpg
Nested Craters on Mars, 40.104° N, 125.005° E. These nested craters are probably caused by changes in the strength of the target material. This usually happens when a weaker material overlies a stronger material.

In the absence of atmosphere, the impact process begins when the impactor first touches the target surface. This contact accelerates the target and decelerates the impactor. Because the impactor is moving so rapidly, the rear of the object moves a significant distance during the short-but-finite time taken for the deceleration to propagate across the impactor. As a result, the impactor is compressed, its density rises, and the pressure within it increases dramatically. Peak pressures in large impacts exceed 1 T Pa to reach values more usually found deep in the interiors of planets, or generated artificially in nuclear explosions.

In physical terms, a shock wave originates from the point of contact. As this shock wave expands, it decelerates and compresses the impactor, and it accelerates and compresses the target. Stress levels within the shock wave far exceed the strength of solid materials; consequently, both the impactor and the target close to the impact site are irreversibly damaged. Many crystalline minerals can be transformed into higher-density phases by shock waves; for example, the common mineral quartz can be transformed into the higher-pressure forms coesite and stishovite. Many other shock-related changes take place within both impactor and target as the shock wave passes through, and some of these changes can be used as diagnostic tools to determine whether particular geological features were produced by impact cratering. [18]

As the shock wave decays, the shocked region decompresses towards more usual pressures and densities. The damage produced by the shock wave raises the temperature of the material. In all but the smallest impacts this increase in temperature is sufficient to melt the impactor, and in larger impacts to vaporize most of it and to melt large volumes of the target. As well as being heated, the target near the impact is accelerated by the shock wave, and it continues moving away from the impact behind the decaying shock wave. [18]


Contact, compression, decompression, and the passage of the shock wave all occur within a few tenths of a second for a large impact. The subsequent excavation of the crater occurs more slowly, and during this stage the flow of material is largely subsonic. During excavation, the crater grows as the accelerated target material moves away from the point of impact. The target's motion is initially downwards and outwards, but it becomes outwards and upwards. The flow initially produces an approximately hemispherical cavity that continues to grow, eventually producing a paraboloid (bowl-shaped) crater in which the centre has been pushed down, a significant volume of material has been ejected, and a topographically elevated crater rim has been pushed up. When this cavity has reached its maximum size, it is called the transient cavity. [18]

Herschel Crater on Saturn's moon Mimas Mimas moon.jpg
Herschel Crater on Saturn's moon Mimas

The depth of the transient cavity is typically a quarter to a third of its diameter. Ejecta thrown out of the crater do not include material excavated from the full depth of the transient cavity; typically the depth of maximum excavation is only about a third of the total depth. As a result, about one third of the volume of the transient crater is formed by the ejection of material, and the remaining two thirds is formed by the displacement of material downwards, outwards and upwards, to form the elevated rim. For impacts into highly porous materials, a significant crater volume may also be formed by the permanent compaction of the pore space. Such compaction craters may be important on many asteroids, comets and small moons.

In large impacts, as well as material displaced and ejected to form the crater, significant volumes of target material may be melted and vaporized together with the original impactor. Some of this impact melt rock may be ejected, but most of it remains within the transient crater, initially forming a layer of impact melt coating the interior of the transient cavity. In contrast, the hot dense vaporized material expands rapidly out of the growing cavity, carrying some solid and molten material within it as it does so. As this hot vapor cloud expands, it rises and cools much like the archetypal mushroom cloud generated by large nuclear explosions. In large impacts, the expanding vapor cloud may rise to many times the scale height of the atmosphere, effectively expanding into free space.

Most material ejected from the crater is deposited within a few crater radii, but a small fraction may travel large distances at high velocity, and in large impacts it may exceed escape velocity and leave the impacted planet or moon entirely. The majority of the fastest material is ejected from close to the center of impact, and the slowest material is ejected close to the rim at low velocities to form an overturned coherent flap of ejecta immediately outside the rim. As ejecta escapes from the growing crater, it forms an expanding curtain in the shape of an inverted cone. The trajectory of individual particles within the curtain is thought to be largely ballistic.

Small volumes of un-melted and relatively un-shocked material may be spalled at very high relative velocities from the surface of the target and from the rear of the impactor. Spalling provides a potential mechanism whereby material may be ejected into inter-planetary space largely undamaged, and whereby small volumes of the impactor may be preserved undamaged even in large impacts. Small volumes of high-speed material may also be generated early in the impact by jetting. This occurs when two surfaces converge rapidly and obliquely at a small angle, and high-temperature highly shocked material is expelled from the convergence zone with velocities that may be several times larger than the impact velocity.

Modification and collapse

Weathering may change the aspect of a crater drastically. This mound on Mars' north pole may be the result of an impact crater that was buried by sediment and subsequently re-exposed by erosion. Conical mound in trough on Mars' north pole.jpg
Weathering may change the aspect of a crater drastically. This mound on Mars' north pole may be the result of an impact crater that was buried by sediment and subsequently re-exposed by erosion.

In most circumstances, the transient cavity is not stable and collapses under gravity. In small craters, less than about 4 km diameter on Earth, there is some limited collapse of the crater rim coupled with debris sliding down the crater walls and drainage of impact melts into the deeper cavity. The resultant structure is called a simple crater, and it remains bowl-shaped and superficially similar to the transient crater. In simple craters, the original excavation cavity is overlain by a lens of collapse breccia, ejecta and melt rock, and a portion of the central crater floor may sometimes be flat.

Multi-ringed impact basin Valhalla on Jupiter's moon Callisto Valhalla crater on Callisto.jpg
Multi-ringed impact basin Valhalla on Jupiter's moon Callisto

Above a certain threshold size, which varies with planetary gravity, the collapse and modification of the transient cavity is much more extensive, and the resulting structure is called a complex crater. The collapse of the transient cavity is driven by gravity, and involves both the uplift of the central region and the inward collapse of the rim. The central uplift is not the result of elastic rebound, which is a process in which a material with elastic strength attempts to return to its original geometry; rather the collapse is a process in which a material with little or no strength attempts to return to a state of gravitational equilibrium.

Complex craters have uplifted centers, and they have typically broad flat shallow crater floors, and terraced walls. At the largest sizes, one or more exterior or interior rings may appear, and the structure may be labeled an impact basin rather than an impact crater. Complex-crater morphology on rocky planets appears to follow a regular sequence with increasing size: small complex craters with a central topographic peak are called central peak craters, for example Tycho; intermediate-sized craters, in which the central peak is replaced by a ring of peaks, are called peak-ring craters, for example Schrödinger; and the largest craters contain multiple concentric topographic rings, and are called multi-ringed basins, for example Orientale. On icy (as opposed to rocky) bodies, other morphological forms appear that may have central pits rather than central peaks, and at the largest sizes may contain many concentric rings. Valhalla on Callisto is an example of this type.

Identifying impact craters

Impact structure of craters: simple and complex craters Craterstructure.gif
Impact structure of craters: simple and complex craters
Wells Creek crater in Tennessee, United States: a close-up of shatter cones developed in fine grained dolomite Wells creek shatter cones 2.JPG
Wells Creek crater in Tennessee, United States: a close-up of shatter cones developed in fine grained dolomite
Decorah crater: aerial electromagnetic resistivity map (USGS) USGS Decorah crater.jpg
Decorah crater: aerial electromagnetic resistivity map (USGS)
Meteor Crater in the U.S. state of Arizona, was the world's first confirmed impact crater. Barringer Crater USGS.jpg
Meteor Crater in the U.S. state of Arizona, was the world's first confirmed impact crater.
Shoemaker Crater in Western Australia was renamed in memory of Gene Shoemaker. Shoemaker Impact Structure, Western Australia.JPG
Shoemaker Crater in Western Australia was renamed in memory of Gene Shoemaker.

Non-explosive volcanic craters can usually be distinguished from impact craters by their irregular shape and the association of volcanic flows and other volcanic materials. Impact craters produce melted rocks as well, but usually in smaller volumes with different characteristics. [6]

The distinctive mark of an impact crater is the presence of rock that has undergone shock-metamorphic effects, such as shatter cones, melted rocks, and crystal deformations. The problem is that these materials tend to be deeply buried, at least for simple craters. They tend to be revealed in the uplifted center of a complex crater, however. [21] [22]

Impacts produce distinctive shock-metamorphic effects that allow impact sites to be distinctively identified. Such shock-metamorphic effects can include:

Economic importance of impacts

On Earth impact craters have resulted in useful minerals. Some of the ores produced from impact related effects on Earth include ores of iron, uranium, gold, copper, and nickel. It is estimated that the value of materials mined from impact structures is five billion dollars/year just for North America. [28] The eventual usefulness of impact craters depends on several factors especially the nature of the materials that were impacted and when the materials were affected. In some cases the deposits were already in place and the impact brought them to the surface. These are called "progenetic economic deposits." Others were created during the actual impact. The great energy involved caused melting. Useful minerals formed as a result of this energy are classified as "syngenetic deposits." The third type, called "epigenetic deposits," is caused by the creation of a basin from the impact. Many of the minerals that our modern lives depend on are associated with impacts in the past. The Vredeford Dome in the center of the Witwatersrand Basin is the largest goldfield in the world which has supplied about 40% of all the gold ever mined in an impact structure (though the gold did not come from the bolide). [29] [30] [31] [32] The asteroid that struck the region was 9.7 km (6 mi) wide. The Sudbury Basin was caused by an impacting body over 9.7 km (6 mi) in diameter. [33] [34] This basin is famous for its deposits of nickel, copper, and platinum group elements. An impact was involved in making the Carswell structure in Saskatchewan, Canada; it contains uranium deposits. [35] [36] [37] Hydrocarbons are common around impact structures. Fifty percent of impact structures in North America in hydrocarbon-bearing sedimentary basins contain oil/gas fields. [38] [28]

Martian craters

Because of the many missions studying Mars since the 1960s, there is good coverage of its surface which contains large numbers of craters. Many of the craters on Mars differ from those on the Moon and other moons since Mars contains ice under the ground, especially in the higher latitudes. Some of the types of craters that have special shapes due to impact into ice-rich ground are pedestal craters, rampart craters, expanded craters, and LARLE craters.

Lists of craters

Impact craters on Earth

World map in equirectangular projection of the craters on the Earth Impact Database as of November 2017 (in the SVG file, hover over a crater to show its details) Earth Impact Database world map.svg
World map in equirectangular projection of the craters on the Earth Impact Database as of November 2017 (in the SVG file, hover over a crater to show its details)

On Earth, the recognition of impact craters is a branch of geology, and is related to planetary geology in the study of other worlds. Out of many proposed craters, relatively few are confirmed. The following twenty are a sample of articles of confirmed and well-documented impact sites.

See the Earth Impact Database, [39] a website concerned with 190 (as of July 2019) scientifically-confirmed impact craters on Earth.

Some extraterrestrial craters

Balanchine crater in Caloris Basin, photographed by MESSENGER, 2011 Balanchine crater in Caloris Basin.jpg
Balanchine crater in Caloris Basin, photographed by MESSENGER , 2011

Largest named craters in the Solar System

Tirawa crater straddling the terminator on Rhea, lower right. PIA09819 Tirawa basin.jpg
Tirawa crater straddling the terminator on Rhea, lower right.
  1. North Polar Basin/Borealis Basin (disputed) – Mars – Diameter: 10,600 km
  2. South Pole-Aitken basin – Moon – Diameter: 2,500 km
  3. Hellas Basin – Mars – Diameter: 2,100 km
  4. Caloris Basin – Mercury – Diameter: 1,550 km
  5. Imbrium Basin – Moon – Diameter: 1,100 km
  6. Isidis Planitia – Mars – Diameter: 1,100 km
  7. Mare Tranquilitatis – Moon – Diameter: 870 km
  8. Argyre Planitia – Mars – Diameter: 800 km
  9. Rembrandt – Mercury – Diameter: 715 km
  10. Serenitatis Basin – Moon – Diameter: 700 km
  11. Mare Nubium – Moon – Diameter: 700 km
  12. Beethoven – Mercury – Diameter: 625 km
  13. Valhalla – Callisto – Diameter: 600 km, with rings to 4,000 km diameter
  14. Hertzsprung – Moon – Diameter: 590 km
  15. Turgis – Iapetus – Diameter: 580 km
  16. Apollo – Moon – Diameter: 540 km
  17. Engelier – Iapetus – Diameter: 504 km
  18. Mamaldi – Rhea – Diameter: 480 km
  19. Huygens – Mars – Diameter: 470 km
  20. Schiaparelli – Mars – Diameter: 470 km
  21. Rheasilvia – 4 Vesta – Diameter: 460 km
  22. Gerin – Iapetus – Diameter: 445 km
  23. Odysseus – Tethys – Diameter: 445 km
  24. Korolev – Moon – Diameter: 430 km
  25. Falsaron – Iapetus – Diameter: 424 km
  26. Dostoevskij – Mercury – Diameter: 400 km
  27. Menrva – Titan – Diameter: 392 km
  28. Tolstoj – Mercury – Diameter: 390 km
  29. Goethe – Mercury – Diameter: 380 km
  30. Malprimis – Iapetus – Diameter: 377 km
  31. Tirawa – Rhea – Diameter: 360 km
  32. Orientale Basin – Moon – Diameter: 350 km, with rings to 930 km diameter
  33. Evander – Dione – Diameter: 350 km
  34. Epigeus – Ganymede – Diameter: 343 km
  35. Gertrude – Titania – Diameter: 326 km
  36. Telemus – Tethys – Diameter: 320 km
  37. Asgard – Callisto – Diameter: 300 km, with rings to 1,400 km diameter
  38. Vredefort impact structure – Earth – Diameter: 300 km
  39. Kerwan – Ceres – Diameter: 284 km
  40. Powehiwehi – Rhea – Diameter: 271 km

There are approximately twelve more impact craters/basins larger than 300 km on the Moon, five on Mercury, and four on Mars. [40] Large basins, some unnamed but mostly smaller than 300 km, can also be found on Saturn's moons Dione, Rhea and Iapetus.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meteorite</span> Solid debris from outer space that hits a planetary surface

A meteorite is a solid piece of debris from an object, such as a comet, asteroid, or meteoroid, that originates in outer space and survives its passage through the atmosphere to reach the surface of a planet or moon. When the original object enters the atmosphere, various factors such as friction, pressure, and chemical interactions with the atmospheric gases cause it to heat up and radiate energy. It then becomes a meteor and forms a fireball, also known as a shooting star; astronomers call the brightest examples "bolides". Once it settles on the larger body's surface, the meteor becomes a meteorite. Meteorites vary greatly in size. For geologists, a bolide is a meteorite large enough to create an impact crater.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meteor Crater</span> Meteorite impact crater in northern Arizona

Meteor Crater or Barringer Crater is a meteorite impact crater about 37 mi (60 km) east of Flagstaff and 18 mi (29 km) west of Winslow in the desert of northern Arizona, United States. The site had several earlier names, and fragments of the meteorite are officially called the Canyon Diablo Meteorite, after the adjacent Canyon Diablo.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Impact event</span> Collision of two astronomical objects

An impact event is a collision between astronomical objects causing measurable effects. Impact events have physical consequences and have been found to regularly occur in planetary systems, though the most frequent involve asteroids, comets or meteoroids and have minimal effect. When large objects impact terrestrial planets such as the Earth, there can be significant physical and biospheric consequences, though atmospheres mitigate many surface impacts through atmospheric entry. Impact craters and structures are dominant landforms on many of the Solar System's solid objects and present the strongest empirical evidence for their frequency and scale.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nördlinger Ries</span> Meteorite impact crater in Bavaria, Germany

The Nördlinger Ries is an impact crater and large circular depression in western Bavaria and eastern Baden-Württemberg. It is located north of the Danube in the district of Donau-Ries. The city of Nördlingen is located within the depression, about 6 kilometres (3.7 mi) south-west of its centre.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sudbury Basin</span> Third largest verified astrobleme on earth, remains of an Paleoproterozoic Era impact

The Sudbury Basin, also known as Sudbury Structure or the Sudbury Nickel Irruptive, is a major geological structure in Ontario, Canada. It is the third-largest known impact crater or astrobleme on Earth, as well as one of the oldest. The crater was formed 1.849 billion years ago in the Paleoproterozoic era.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mistastin crater</span> Impact crater lake in Canada

Mistastin crater is a meteorite crater in Labrador, Canada which contains the roughly circular Mistastin Lake. The lake is approximately 16 km (9.9 mi) in diameter, while the estimated diameter of the original crater is 28 km (17 mi). The age of the crater is calculated to be 36.6 ± 2 million years (Eocene).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ray system</span> Radial streaks of material thrown out during formation of an impact crater

In planetary geology, a ray system comprises radial streaks of fine ejecta thrown out during the formation of an impact crater, looking somewhat like many thin spokes coming from the hub of a wheel. The rays may extend for lengths up to several times the diameter of their originating crater, and are often accompanied by small secondary craters formed by larger chunks of ejecta. Ray systems have been identified on the Moon, Earth, Mercury, and some moons of the outer planets. Originally it was thought that they existed only on planets or moons lacking an atmosphere, but more recently they have been identified on Mars in infrared images taken from orbit by 2001 Mars Odyssey's thermal imager.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geology of Mercury</span> Geologic structure and composition of planet Mercury

The geology of Mercury is the scientific study of the surface, crust, and interior of the planet Mercury. It emphasizes the composition, structure, history, and physical processes that shape the planet. It is analogous to the field of terrestrial geology. In planetary science, the term geology is used in its broadest sense to mean the study of the solid parts of planets and moons. The term incorporates aspects of geophysics, geochemistry, mineralogy, geodesy, and cartography.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geology of the Moon</span> Structure and composition of the Moon

The geology of the Moon is quite different from that of Earth. The Moon lacks a true atmosphere, and the absence of free oxygen and water eliminates erosion due to weather. Instead, the surface is eroded much more slowly through the bombardment of the lunar surface by micrometeorites. It does not have any known form of plate tectonics, it has a lower gravity, and because of its small size, it cooled faster. In addition to impacts, the geomorphology of the lunar surface has been shaped by volcanism, which is now thought to have ended less than 50 million years ago. The Moon is a differentiated body, with a crust, mantle, and core.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ejecta blanket</span> Symmetrical apron of ejecta that surrounds an impact crater

An ejecta blanket is a generally symmetrical apron of ejecta that surrounds an impact crater; it is layered thickly at the crater's rim and thin to discontinuous at the blanket's outer edge. The impact cratering is one of the basic surface formation mechanisms of the solar system bodies and the formation and emplacement of ejecta blankets are the fundamental characteristics associated with impact cratering event. The ejecta materials are considered as the transported materials beyond the transient cavity formed during impact cratering regardless of the state of the target materials.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Secondary crater</span>

Secondary craters are impact craters formed by the ejecta that was thrown out of a larger crater. They sometimes form radial crater chains. In addition, secondary craters are often seen as clusters or rays surrounding primary craters. The study of secondary craters exploded around the mid-twentieth century when researchers studying surface craters to predict the age of planetary bodies realized that secondary craters contaminated the crater statistics of a body's crater count.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geology of solar terrestrial planets</span> Geology of Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars and Ceres

The geology of solar terrestrial planets mainly deals with the geological aspects of the four terrestrial planets of the Solar System – Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars – and one terrestrial dwarf planet: Ceres. Earth is the only terrestrial planet known to have an active hydrosphere.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beethoven quadrangle</span> Quadrangle on Mercury

The Beethoven quadrangle is located in the equatorial region of Mercury, in the center of the area imaged by Mariner 10. Most pictures of the quadrangle were obtained at high sun angles as the Mariner 10 spacecraft receded from the planet. Geologic map units are described and classified on the basis of morphology, texture, and albedo, and they are assigned relative ages based on stratigraphic relations and on visual comparisons of the density of superposed craters. Crater ages are established by relative freshness of appearance, as indicated by topographic sharpness of their rim crests and degree of preservation of interior and exterior features such as crater floors, walls, and ejecta aprons. Generally, topography appears highly subdued because of the sun angle, and boundaries between map units are not clearly defined.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michelangelo quadrangle</span> Quadrangle on Mercury

The Michelangelo quadrangle is in the southern hemisphere of the planet Mercury, where the imaged part is heavily cratered terrain that has been strongly influenced by the presence of multiring basins. At least four such basins, now nearly obliterated, have largely controlled the distribution of plains materials and structural trends in the map area. Many craters, interpreted to be of impact origin, display a spectrum of modification styles and degradation states. The interaction between basins, craters, and plains in this quadrangle provides important clues to geologic processes that have formed the morphology of the mercurian surface.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Complex crater</span> Large impact craters with uplifted centres

Complex craters are a type of large impact crater morphology.

Mars may contain ores that would be very useful to potential colonists. The abundance of volcanic features together with widespread cratering are strong evidence for a variety of ores. While nothing may be found on Mars that would justify the high cost of transport to Earth, the more ores that future colonists can obtain from Mars, the easier it would be to build colonies there.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Late Heavy Bombardment</span> Hypothesized astronomical event

The Late Heavy Bombardment (LHB), or lunar cataclysm, is a hypothesized event thought to have occurred approximately 4.1 to 3.8 billion years (Ga) ago, at a time corresponding to the Neohadean and Eoarchean eras on Earth. According to the hypothesis, during this interval, a disproportionately large number of asteroids and comets collided with the early terrestrial planets in the inner Solar System, including Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars. These came from both post-accretion and planetary instability-driven populations of impactors. Although it used to be widely accepted, it remained difficult to provide an overwhelming amount of evidence for the hypothesis. However, recent re-appraisal of the cosmo-chemical constraints indicates that there was likely no late spike in the bombardment rate.

<i>Traces of Catastrophe</i> Book by Bevan M. French

Traces of Catastrophe: A Handbook of Shock-Metamorphic Effects in Terrestrial Meteorite Impact Structures is a book written by Bevan M. French of the Smithsonian Institution. It is a comprehensive technical reference on the science of impact craters. It was published in 1998 by the Lunar and Planetary Institute (LPI), which is part of the Universities Space Research Association (USRA). It was originally available in hard copy from LPI, but is now only available as a portable document format (PDF) e-book free download.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LARLE crater</span> Class of Martian impact craters

A low-aspect-ratio layered ejecta crater is a class of impact crater found on the planet Mars. This class of impact craters was discovered by Northern Arizona University scientist Professor Nadine Barlow and Dr. Joseph Boyce from the University of Hawaii in October 2013. Barlow described this class of craters as having a "thin-layered outer deposit" surpassing "the typical range of ejecta". "The combination helps vaporize the materials and create a base flow surge. The low aspect ratio refers to how thin the deposits are relative to the area they cover", Barlow said. The scientists used data from continuing reconnaissance of Mars using the old Mars Odyssey orbiter and the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. They discovered 139 LARLE craters ranging in diameter from 1.0 to 12.2 km, with 97% of the LARLE craters found poleward of 35N and 40S. The remaining 3% mainly traced in the equatorial Medusae Fossae Formation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Multi-ringed basin</span> Crater containing multiple concentric topographic rings

A multi-ringed basin is not a simple bowl-shaped crater, or a peak ring crater, but one containing multiple concentric topographic rings; a multi-ringed basin could be described as a massive impact crater, surrounded by circular chains of mountains resembling rings on a bull's-eye. A multi-ringed basin may have an area of many thousands of square kilometres.


  1. Timmer, John (6 February 2014). "Spectacular new Martian impact crater spotted from orbit". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 5 May 2022. Retrieved 26 September 2022. The time window on the impact, between July 2010 and May 2012, simply represents the time between two different Context Camera photos of the same location
  2. Lofgren, Gary E.; Bence, A. E.; Duke, Michael B.; Dungan, Michael A.; Green, John C.; Haggerty, Stephen E.; Haskin, L.A. (1981). Basaltic Volcanism on the Terrestrial Planets. New York: Pergamon Press. p. 765. ISBN   0-08-028086-2.
  3. Consolmagno, G.J.; Schaefer, M.W. (1994). Worlds Apart: A Textbook in Planetary Sciences. Prentice Hall. p. 56.
  4. Morrison, D.A.; Clanton, U.S. (1979). "Properties of microcraters and cosmic dust of less than 1000 Å dimensions". Proceedings of Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 10th, Houston, Tex., March 19–23, 1979. New York: Pergamon Press Inc. 2: 1649–1663. Bibcode:1979LPSC...10.1649M . Retrieved 3 February 2022.
  5. "Barringer Crater". American Museum of Natural History. Retrieved 16 November 2021.
  6. 1 2 French, Bevan M (1998). "Chapter 7: How to Find Impact Structures". Traces of Catastrophe: A Handbook of Shock-Metamorphic Effects in Terrestrial Meteorite Impact Structures. Lunar and Planetary Institute. pp. 97–99. OCLC   40770730.
  7. Carr, M.H. (2006) The surface of Mars; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, p. 23.
  8. Grieve R.A.; Shoemaker, E.M. (1994). The Record of Past Impacts on Earth in Hazards due to Comets and Asteroids, T. Gehrels, Ed.; University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, pp. 417–464.
  9. Bottke, WF; Vokrouhlický D Nesvorný D. (2007). "An asteroid breakup 160 Myr ago as the probable source of the K/T impactor". Nature. 449 (7158): 48–53. Bibcode:2007Natur.449...48B. doi:10.1038/nature06070. PMID   17805288. S2CID   4322622.
  10. Zahnle, K.; et al. (2003). "Cratering rates in the outer Solar System" (PDF). Icarus. 163 (2): 263. Bibcode:2003Icar..163..263Z. CiteSeerX . doi:10.1016/s0019-1035(03)00048-4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 July 2009. Retrieved 24 October 2017.
  11. Grieve, R.A.F.; Cintala, M.J.; Tagle, R. (2007). Planetary Impacts in Encyclopedia of the Solar System, 2nd ed., L-A. McFadden et al. Eds, p. 826.
  12. Shoemaker, E.M.; Shoemaker, C.S. (1999). The Role of Collisions in The New Solar System, 4th ed., J.K. Beatty et al., Eds., p. 73.
  13. 1 2 Levy, David (2002). Shoemaker by Levy: The man who made an impact . Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 59, 69, 74–75, 78–79, 81–85, 99–100. ISBN   9780691113258.
  14. Boon, John D.; Albritton, Claude C. Jr. (November 1936). "Meteorite craters and their possible relationship to "cryptovolcanic structures"". Field & Laboratory. 5 (1): 1–9.
  15. Grieve, R.A.F. (1990) Impact Cratering on the Earth. Scientific American, April 1990, p. 66.
  16. 1 2 3 "How fast are meteorites traveling when they reach the ground". American Meteor Society. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  17. Kenkmann, Thomas; Hörz, Friedrich; Deutsch, Alexander (1 January 2005). Large Meteorite Impacts III. Geological Society of America. p. 34. ISBN   978-0-8137-2384-6.
  18. 1 2 3 4 Melosh, H.J., 1989, Impact cratering: A geologic process: New York, Oxford University Press, 245 p.
  19. 'Key to Giant Space Sponge Revealed',, 4 July 2007
  20. "HiRISE – Nested Craters (ESP_027610_2205)". HiRISE Operations Center. University of Arizona.
  21. French, Bevan M (1998). "Chapter 4: Shock-Metamorphic Effects in Rocks and Minerals". Traces of Catastrophe: A Handbook of Shock-Metamorphic Effects in Terrestrial Meteorite Impact Structures. Lunar and Planetary Institute. pp. 31–60. OCLC   40770730.
  22. French, Bevan M (1998). "Chapter 5: Shock-Metamorphosed Rocks (Impactites) in Impact Structures". Traces of Catastrophe: A Handbook of Shock-Metamorphic Effects in Terrestrial Meteorite Impact Structures. Lunar and Planetary Institute. pp. 61–78. OCLC   40770730.
  23. Randall 2015, p. 157.
  24. Randall 2015, pp. 154–155.
  25. Randall 2015, p. 156.
  26. Randall 2015, p. 155.
  27. US Geological Survey. "Iowa Meteorite Crater Confirmed" . Retrieved 7 March 2013.
  28. 1 2 Grieve, R., V. Masaitis. 1994. The Economic Potential of Terrestrial Impact Craters. International Geology Review: 36, 105–151.
  29. Daly, R. 1947. The Vredefort ring structure of South Africa. Journal of Geology 55: 125145
  30. Hargraves, R. 1961. Shatter cones in the rocks of the Vredefort Ring. Transactions of the Geological Society of South Africa 64: 147–154
  31. Leroux H., Reimold W., Doukhan, J. 1994. A TEM investigation of shock metamorphism in quartz from the Vredefort Dome, South Africa. Tectonophysics 230: 223–230
  32. Martini, J. 1978. Coesite and stishovite in the Vredefort Dome, South Africa. Nature 272: 715–717
  33. Grieve, R., Stöffler D, A. Deutsch. 1991. The Sudbury Structure: controversial or misunderstood. Journal of Geophysical Research 96: 22 753–22 764
  34. French, B. 1970. Possible Relations Between Meteorite Impact and Igneous Petrogenesis As Indicated by the Sudbury Structure, Ontario, Canada. Bull. Volcan. 34, 466–517.
  35. Harper, C. 1983. The Geology and Uranium Deposits of the Central Part of the Carswell Structure, Northern Saskatchewan, Canada. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA, 337 pp
  36. Lainé, R., D. Alonso, M. Svab (eds). 1985. The Carswell Structure Uranium Deposits. Geological Association of Canada, Special Paper 29: 230 pp
  37. Grieve, R., V. Masaitis. 1994. The economic potential of terrestrial impact craters. International Geology Review 36: 105–151
  38. Priyadarshi, Nitish (23 August 2009). "Environment and Geology: Are Impact Craters Useful?".
  39. "Planetary and Space Science Centre – UNB".
  40. "Planetary Names: Welcome".


Further reading