Plebeian council

Last updated

The Concilium Plebis (English: Plebeian Council, Plebeian Assembly, People's Assembly or Council of the Plebs) was the principal assembly of the common people of the ancient Roman Republic. It functioned as a legislative/judicial assembly, [1] through which the plebeians (commoners) could pass legislation (called plebiscites), elect plebeian tribunes and plebeian aediles, and try judicial cases. The Plebeian Council was originally organized on the basis of the Curia but in 471 BC adopted an organizational system based on residential districts or tribes. [2] The Plebeian Council usually met in the well of the Comitium and could only be convoked by the tribune of the plebs. The patricians were excluded from the Council.

Contents

History

From 509 to 471 BC

When the Roman Republic was founded in 509 BC, the Roman people were divided into a total of thirty curiae. Plutarch and Dionysius of Halicarnassus believed that these curiae were subdivisions of the three Romulean Tribes. [3] The curiae were organized on the basis of the family, and thus the ethnic structure of early Rome. Each curia even had its own festivals, gods, and religious rites. The thirty curiae gathered into a legislative assembly known as the Comitia Curiata or Curiate Assembly. This assembly was created shortly after the legendary founding of the city in 753 BC, and it formally elected new Roman kings. During this time, plebeians had no political rights and were unable to influence Roman Law. Each plebeian family was dependent on a particular patrician family. Accordingly, each plebeian family belonged to the same curia as its patrician patron. While the plebeians each belonged to a particular curia, only patricians could actually vote in the Curiate Assembly.

The Plebeian Council was originally organized around the office of the Tribunes of the Plebs in 494 BC. Plebeians probably met in their own assembly prior to the establishment of the office of the Tribune of the Plebs, but this assembly would have had no political role. The Offices of the plebeian tribune and plebeian aedile were created in 494 BC following the first plebeian secession. In 494 BC, the plebeians held nightly meetings in some districts, with their earliest attempts at organization focusing on matters relating to their class. [4] Some of these issues included debt, civil and land rights, and military service. [5] Tribunes of the Plebs were also charged with protecting the plebeian interests against the patrician oligarchy. [6] In 492 BC, the office of Tribune was acknowledged by the patricians, thereby creating a legitimate assembly of plebeians (Concilium Plebis). [5] After 494 BC, a plebeian tribune always presided over the Plebeian Curiate Assembly. This "Plebeian Curiate Assembly" was the original Plebeian Council, [4] which elected the plebeian Tribunes and Aediles, [7] and passed legislation (plebiscita) that applied only to the plebeians.

From 471 to 27 BC

During the later years of the Roman Kingdom, King Servius Tullius enacted a series of constitutional reforms. One of these reforms resulted in the creation of a new organizational unit, the tribe, to assist in the reorganization of the army. [8] Its divisions were not ethnic (as the divisions of the Curia were), but rather geographical. Tullius divided the city into four geographical districts, each encompassing a single tribe. Between the reign of Tullius and the late 3rd century BC, the number of tribes expanded from 4 to 35. By 471 BC, the plebeians decided that organization by tribe granted them a level of political independence from their patrician patrons [9] that the curiae did not. Therefore, around 471 BC, [10] a law was passed to allow the plebeians to begin organizing by tribe. Thus, the "Plebeian Curiate Assembly" began to use tribes, rather than curiae, as its basis for organization. As such, the Plebeian Council changed from a "Plebeian Curiate Assembly" to a "Plebeian Tribal Assembly". [11]

The only difference between the Plebeian Council after 471 BC and the ordinary Tribal Assembly (which also organized on the basis of the tribes) was that the tribes of the Plebeian Council included only plebeians, whereas the tribes of the Tribal Assembly included both plebeians and patricians. However, most Romans were plebeians. Therefore, the principal differences between the Plebeian Council and the Tribal Assembly were mostly legal rather than demographic. These legal differences derived from the fact that Roman law did not recognize an assembly consisting only of one group of people (plebeians in this case) from an assembly consisting of all of the People of Rome. Over time, however, these legal differences were mitigated with legislation. The Plebeian Council elected two classes of plebeian officers, the tribunes and the aediles, and thus Roman law classified these two kinds of officers as the elected representatives of the plebeians. [10] As such, they acted as the presiding officers of this assembly.

The plebeians, through the Plebeian Council, began to gain power during this time. Two secessions in 449 BC and 287 BC brought about increased authority for the plebeian assembly and its leaders, and it was greatly due to concessions made by dictators and consuls that the now mobilized and angry plebeian population began to develop power. [4] In 339 BC, the Lex Publilia made plebiscites (plebeian legislation) law, [12] however this was not widely accepted by patricians until the 287 BC Lex Hortensia , which definitively gave the council the power to create laws to which both plebeians and patricians would be subject. [13] Additionally, between 291 and 219 BC, the Lex Maenia was passed, which required of the senate to approve any bill put forward by the Plebeian Council. [13]

In 88 BC, Sulla introduced measures which transferred all voting power to the Comitia Centuriata from tribal assemblies, therefore rendering the Council of the Plebs virtually powerless. [14]

After 27 BC

Although the Plebeian Council survived the fall of the Roman Republic, [15] it quickly lost its legislative, judicial and electoral powers to the Senate. By virtue of their status as perpetual tribunes, both Julius Caesar and the Emperor Augustus always had absolute control over the Plebeian Council. [15] The Plebeian Council disappeared shortly after the reign of Tiberius.

The Plebeian Council and the Conflict of the Orders

Chart showing the checks and balances of the Constitution of the Roman Republic Roman constitution.png
Chart showing the checks and balances of the Constitution of the Roman Republic

The creation of the office of plebeian tribune and plebeian aedile marked the end of the first phase of the struggle between the plebeians and the patricians (the Conflict of the Orders). The next major development in this conflict occurred through the Plebeian Council. During a modification of the original Valerian law in 449 BC, plebiscites acquired the full force of law, and thus applied to all Romans. Before this time, plebiscites had applied only to plebeians. By the early 4th century BC, the plebeians, who still lacked any real political power, [16] had become exhausted and bitter. In 339 BC they facilitated the passage of a law (the lex Publilia), which brought the Conflict of the Orders closer to a conclusion. Before this time, a bill passed by any assembly could become law only after the patrician senators gave their approval, which came in the form of a decree called the auctoritas patrum ("authority of the fathers" or "authority of the patrician senators"). The lex Publilia required the auctoritas patrum to be passed before a law could be voted on by one of the assemblies, rather than afterward. [17] This modification seems to have made the auctoritas patrum irrelevant. [18] Thus, the Plebeian Council became independent of the patrician aristocracy in everything but name.

By 287 BC, the economic condition of the average plebeian had deteriorated further. The problem appears to have centered on widespread indebtedness. [19] The plebeians demanded relief, but the senators, most of whom belonged to the creditor class, refused to abide by the plebeians' demands. The plebeians withdrew en masse to the Janiculum hill, resulting in the final plebeian secession. To end this movement, a plebeian dictator (Quintus Hortensius) was appointed, who ultimately passed a law called the "Hortensian Law" ( lex Hortensia ). The most significant component of this law was its termination of the requirement that auctoritas patrum be obtained before any bill could be considered by the Plebeian Council. [19] In this way the law removed from the patrician senators their final check over the Plebeian Council. [20] The lex Hortensia, however, should not be viewed as the final triumph of democracy over aristocracy. [20] Close relations between the plebeian tribunes and the senate meant that the senate could still exercise a great degree of control over the Plebeian Council. Thus, the ultimate significance of this law was that it robbed the patricians of their final weapon over the plebeians. [20] This ended the Conflict of the Orders, and brought the plebeians to a level of full political equality with the patricians.

Function

Organization of the Plebeian Council

At its formation, the Plebeian Council was organized by Curiae and served as an electoral council wherein plebeian citizens could vote to pass laws. The Plebeian Council would elect Tribunes of the Plebs to preside over their meetings. [21] It is unlikely, however, that the council had any constitutional recognition before the creation of the Twelve Tables between 451 and 450 BC. [22] At the meetings of the Plebeian Council, they would pass resolutions, conduct trials, and discuss matters pertaining to the condition of the plebeians. Their ability to perform political prosecutions was later restricted by the Twelve Tables. [22] The tribal unit organizational system was adopted by the council in 471 BC, although the exact relationship between the Tribunes and tribes is unclear, as the number of Tribunes was not equal to the number of tribes. Additionally, most tribes were located outside of the city, whereas the plebeian Tribunes were exclusive to the city. [21]

Image depicting the engraving of the Twelve Tables Twelve Tables Engraving.jpg
Image depicting the engraving of the Twelve Tables

In the Tribal system, the Council of the Plebeians elected Tribunes of the Plebs, who acted as spokespeople for the plebeian citizens. The Tribunes were revered, and plebeians swore an oath to take vengeance on anyone who would bring them harm. [22] Over time, the Concilium Plebis became the most effective medium of legislation in the Republic, until the introduction of Sulla’s measures in 88 BC. [22]

Tribune of the Plebs

The Tribunes of the Plebs were elected by the Plebeian Council. At first, only 2 to 5 Tribunes were elected until the College of 10 was introduced in 457 BC. [23] They served as spokespeople for the plebeians of Rome, with a purpose of protecting the interests of the plebeians against patrician supremacy. [24] The Tribunes could call meetings of the council over which they presided. [25] Since plebeians were not able to take political actions themselves, the Tribunes had the opportunity to make lasting impacts through their political office. [23] Tribunes were responsible for organizing support for legislation, organizing contiones, a form of discourse or assembly, as well as prosecute criminals before the council. [25] Their position as leaders of the Plebeian Council gave the Tribunes great control over the city in their ability to organize the plebeians into a political weapon. [25]

Comitia Tributa Populi

The Comitia Tributa was a tribal assembly which organized citizens by place of residence. [4] (comitia was neuter plural in form, but singular in meaning.) There is confusion concerning the difference between the Plebeian Council and the Comitia Tributa. Some scholars have found reason to believe that the Concilium Plebis became the Comitia Tributa in 339 or 287 BC. [26] De Martino and Von Fritz believe that after the Lex Hortensia of 287 BC, patricians must not have been excluded from the Plebeian Council, as the laws created by the council were now also applicable to the patricians. [26] However, others believe that they were separate assemblies. Stavely introduced the possibility that Livy may not have recorded the emergence of the Comitia Tributa due to a lack of importance in terminological differences.[ clarification needed ] Stavely therefore has proposed that the Comitia Tributa was established in 449 BC. [26]

Laelius Felix and G.W. Botsford have proposed theories which try to distinguish the terms concilium and comitia. [27] Felix's theory, although widely followed, is also heavily contested. His theory supposes that a concilium denotes an exclusive assembly which included only a part of the universus populus, whereas a comitia designates a meeting of a whole universus populus. [27] The principal arguments against his theory are:

  1. his definition depends on a distinction between assemblies of the populus and of the plebeians, despite the routine denial of the existence of an assembly consisting solely of plebeians after 287 BC; and
  2. there are passages from Roman authors which refer to a plebeian assembly as comitia, as opposed to concilium plebis. [27] This then weakens Felix's proposal that a comitia was an assembly of the universus populus.

G. W. Botsford distinguishes these two types of assemblies in terms of their function. In his theory, a comitia refers to an electoral assembly, and a concilium would then be a legislative or judicial assembly. [27] Although the theories put forth by Botsford and Felix are different, passages from Cicero and Livy can be found to support both. [27] A comitia appears to designate an organized voting assembly, and a concilium often indicates a meeting of a certain group which is exclusive in some sense. The Concilium Plebis is definitively a political assembly. [27]

Legislation and legislative actions

There were three distinct forms of legislative actions undertaken by the Roman Republic: Rogationes, Plebiscita and Leges. These shed light on Roman political structure and the role of the Plebeian Council.

Rogationes

Rogationes (sing. rogatio) were proposals for legislation that were created by the Tribunes of the Plebs. Rogationes were incomplete legislation with no legal force, as they had been subject to tribunician veto or rejected by the senate. It is unclear whether Rogationes were presented in a formal meeting or not; however they demonstrate the matters which were of importance to the Tribunes. [4]

Plebiscita

Plebiscita (sing. plebiscitum) were proposals brought forward by the Tribunes of the Plebs that were approved by majority vote of the tribes of the Concilium Plebis. After the Lex Hortensia was introduced in 287 BC, plebiscita became law for the entire Roman population, including patricians. Plebiscita no longer required senatorial or magisterial approval, and were demonstrative of the will of the plebeian class. [4]

Leges

Leges (sing. lex) were legislation brought forth by a magistrate and presented to the Roman population, in either the Comitia Tributa or the Comitia Centuriata. A Plebiscitum could become a lex if it was adopted by a magistrate and approved by a majority of tribes or centuries. [4]

Some examples of leges introduced which pertained to the Plebeian Council are:

  • Lex Genucia (342 BC), which required that one annual consulship be given to a plebeian. [28]
  • Lex Ogulnia (300 BC), which entitled plebeian citizens to one half of the priesthoods in the colleges of pontifices and augures. [28]
  • Lex Hortensia (287 BC), which made all Roman citizens subject to the laws created by the Plebeian Council. [28]
  • Lex Maenia (between 291 and 219 BC), which required the senate to approve all bills approved by the Plebeian Council. [28]
Legislative actions

Legislative actions by the concilium plebis can be categorized into four principal categories based on their purpose:

  1. Equality: actions which move to create equality between different groups of people
  2. Broadening of participation: actions which aim to increase the political participation of groups which had previously been denied
  3. Protection: actions seeking to place limits on arbitrary action of the state, as well as seeking rights (personal rights, rights to property)
  4. Mutually binding consultation: actions which aim to solidify and increase the power and authority of the Council of the Plebs. [4]

These categories are based on Tilly's Dimensions of Democratization.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aedile</span> Office of the Roman Republic

Aedile was an elected office of the Roman Republic. Based in Rome, the aediles were responsible for maintenance of public buildings and regulation of public festivals. They also had powers to enforce public order and duties to ensure the city of Rome was well supplied and its civil infrastructure well maintained, akin to modern local government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tribune</span> Elected Roman officials

Tribune was the title of various elected officials in ancient Rome. The two most important were the tribunes of the plebs and the military tribunes. For most of Roman history, a college of ten tribunes of the plebs acted as a check on the authority of the senate and the annual magistrates, holding the power of ius intercessionis to intervene on behalf of the plebeians, and veto unfavourable legislation. There were also military tribunes, who commanded portions of the Roman army, subordinate to higher magistrates, such as the consuls and praetors, promagistrates, and their legates. Various officers within the Roman army were also known as tribunes. The title was also used for several other positions and classes in the course of Roman history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Citizens' assemblies of the Roman Republic</span> Political institutions in Roman Republic

The legislative assemblies of the Roman Republic were political institutions in the ancient Roman Republic. According to the contemporary historian Polybius, it was the people who had the final say regarding the election of magistrates, the enactment of Roman laws, the carrying out of capital punishment, the declaration of war and peace, and the creation of alliances. Under the Constitution of the Roman Republic, the people held the ultimate source of sovereignty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political institutions of ancient Rome</span>

Various lists regarding the political institutions of ancient Rome are presented. Each entry in a list is a link to a separate article. Categories included are: constitutions (5), laws (5), and legislatures (7); state offices (28) and office holders ; political factions and social ranks (8). A political glossary (35) of similar construction follows.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conflict of the Orders</span> Political conflict in the Roman Republic, 500–287 BC

The Conflict of the Orders or the Struggle of the Orders was a political struggle between the plebeians (commoners) and patricians (aristocrats) of the ancient Roman Republic lasting from 500 BC to 287 BC in which the plebeians sought political equality with the patricians. It played a major role in the development of the Constitution of the Roman Republic. Shortly after the founding of the Republic, this conflict led to a secession from Rome by the Plebeians to the Sacred Mount at a time of war. The result of this first secession was the creation of the office of plebeian tribune, and with it the first acquisition of real power by the plebeians.

Tribune of the plebs, tribune of the people or plebeian tribune was the first office of the Roman state that was open to the plebeians, and was, throughout the history of the Republic, the most important check on the power of the Roman Senate and magistrates. These tribunes had the power to convene and preside over the Concilium Plebis ; to summon the senate; to propose legislation; and to intervene on behalf of plebeians in legal matters; but the most significant power was to veto the actions of the consuls and other magistrates, thus protecting the interests of the plebeians as a class. The tribunes of the plebs were typically found seated on special benches set up for them in the Roman Forum. The tribunes were sacrosanct, meaning that any assault on their person was punishable by death. In imperial times, the powers of the tribunate were granted to the emperor as a matter of course, and the office itself lost its independence and most of its functions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curiate assembly</span> Peoples assembly in ancient rome

The Curiate Assembly was the principal assembly that evolved in shape and form over the course of the Roman Kingdom until the Comitia Centuriata organized by Servius Tullius. During these first decades, the people of Rome were organized into thirty units called "Curiae". The Curiae were ethnic in nature, and thus were organized on the basis of the early Roman family, or, more specifically, on the basis of the thirty original patrician (aristocratic) clans. The Curiae formed an assembly for legislative, electoral, and judicial purposes. The Curiate Assembly passed laws, elected Consuls, and tried judicial cases. Consuls always presided over the assembly. While plebeians (commoners) could participate in this assembly, only the patricians could vote.

The lex Hortensia, also sometimes referred to as the Hortensian law, was a law passed in Ancient Rome in 287 BC which made all resolutions passed by the Plebeian Council, known as plebiscita, binding on all citizens. It was passed by the dictator Quintus Hortensius in a compromise to bring the plebeians back from their secession to the Janiculum.

The Licino-Sextian rogations were a series of laws proposed by tribunes of the plebs, Gaius Licinius Stolo and Lucius Sextius Lateranus, enacted around 367 BC. Livy calls them rogatio – though he does refer to them at times as lex – as the plebeian assembly did not at the time have the power to enact leges (laws).

Secessio plebis was an informal exercise of power by Rome's plebeian citizens between the 5th century BC and 3rd century BC., similar in concept to the general strike. During the secessio plebis, the plebs would abandon the city en masse in a protest emigration and leave the patrician order to themselves. Therefore, a secessio meant that all shops and workshops would shut down and commercial transactions would largely cease. This was an effective strategy in the Conflict of the Orders due to strength in numbers; plebeian citizens made up the vast majority of Rome's populace and produced most of its food and resources, while a patrician citizen was a member of the minority upper class, the equivalent of the landed gentry of later times. Authors report different numbers for how many secessions there were. M. Cary and H. H. Scullard state there were five between 494 BC and 287 BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman tribe</span> Grouping of Roman citizens

A tribus, or tribe, was a division of the Roman people for military, censorial, and voting purposes. When constituted in the comitia tributa, the tribes were the voting units of a legislative assembly of the Roman Republic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of the Roman Republic</span>

The constitution of the Roman Republic was a set of uncodified norms and customs which, together with various written laws, guided the procedural governance of the Roman Republic. The constitution emerged from that of the Roman kingdom, evolved substantively and significantly – almost to the point of unrecognisability – over the almost five hundred years of the republic. The collapse of republican government and norms beginning in 133 BC would lead to the rise of Augustus and his principate.

Sacrosanctity or inviolability is the declaration of physical inviolability of a place, a sacred object, or a person. Under Roman law, this was established through sacred law, which had religious connotations. Festus explained that: “Sacred laws are laws which have the sanction that anyone who broke them becomes accursed to one of the gods, together with his family and property”. In some cases the law may have been applied to protect temples from being defiled. It could also be applied to protect a person who was declared sacrosanct (inviolable). Those who harmed a sacrosanct person became sacer (accursed) through the declaration sacer esto!. The offender was considered as having harmed the gods or a god, as well as the sacrosanct person and therefore accursed to the gods or a god. This meant that the offender became forfeit to the god(s) and on his death he was surrendered to the god(s) in question. The implication was that anyone who killed him was considered as performing a sacred duty and enjoyed impunity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman assemblies</span> Assemblies active in the time of Roman rule

The Roman Assemblies were institutions in ancient Rome. They functioned as the machinery of the Roman legislative branch, and thus passed all legislation. Since the assemblies operated on the basis of a direct democracy, ordinary citizens, and not elected representatives, would cast all ballots. The assemblies were subject to strong checks on their power by the executive branch and by the Roman Senate. Laws were passed by Curia, Tribes, and century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of the Roman Kingdom</span>

The Roman Kingdom's unwritten constitution originated mainly through precedent. During the years of the Roman Kingdom, the constitutional arrangement was centered on the king, who had the power to appoint assistants, and delegate to them their specific powers. The Roman Senate, which was dominated by the aristocracy, served as the advisory council to the king. Often, the king asked the Senate to vote on various matters, but he was free to ignore any advice they gave him. The king could also request a vote on various matters by the popular assembly, which he was also free to ignore. The popular assembly functioned as a vehicle through which the People of Rome could express their opinions. In it, the people were organized according to their respective curiae. However, the popular assembly did have other functions. For example, it was a forum used by citizens to hear announcements. It could also serve as a trial court for both civil and criminal matters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Constitution of the Roman Republic</span>

The history of the Constitution of the Roman Republic is a study of the ancient Roman Republic that traces the progression of Roman political development from the founding of the Roman Republic in 509 BC until the founding of the Roman Empire in 27 BC. The constitutional history of the Roman Republic can be divided into five phases. The first phase began with the revolution which overthrew the Roman Kingdom in 509 BC, and the final phase ended with the revolution which overthrew the Roman Republic, and thus created the Roman Empire, in 27 BC. Throughout the history of the Republic, the constitutional evolution was driven by the struggle between the aristocracy and the ordinary citizens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tribal assembly</span> Assembly of the Roman Republic

The Tribal Assembly was an assembly consisting of all Roman citizens convened by tribes (tribus).

<i>Lex Publilia</i> (471 BC) Ancient Roman law

The lex Publilia, also known as the Publilian Rogation, was a law traditionally passed in 471 BC, transferring the election of the tribunes of the plebs to the comitia tributa, thereby freeing their election from the direct influence of the Senate and patrician magistrates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Volero Publilius</span> 5th-century BC Roman tribune of the plebs

Volero Publilius was tribune of the plebs in Rome in 472 and 471 BC. During his time as tribune, he secured the passage of two important laws increasing the independence of his office.

The gens Laetoria was a plebeian family at ancient Rome. Its members appear regularly throughout the history of the Republic. None of the Laetorii ever obtained the consulship, but several achieved lesser offices of the Roman state.

References

Notes

  1. ↑ Farrell, Joseph (1986-01-01). "The Distinction Between Comitia and Concilium". Athenaeum. 64: 407–438.
  2. ↑ Drogula, Fred K (2017). "Plebeian Tribunes and the Government of Early Rome". Antichthon. 51: 110. doi:10.1017/ann.2017.8. S2CID   149208490.
  3. ↑ Drogula, Fred K (2017). "Plebeian Tribunes and the Government of Early Rome". Antichthon. 51: 110. doi:10.1017/ann.2017.8. S2CID   149208490.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Wolters 2014.
  5. 1 2 Farrell, Joseph (1986-01-01). "The Distinction Between Comitia and Concilium". Athenaeum. 64: 407–438.
  6. ↑ Drogula, Fred K (2017). "Plebeian Tribunes and the Government of Early Rome". Antichthon. 51: 110. doi:10.1017/ann.2017.8. S2CID   149208490.
  7. ↑ Abbott, 21
  8. ↑ Abbott, 21
  9. ↑ Abbott, 260
  10. 1 2 Abbott, 196
  11. ↑ Abbott, 261
  12. ↑ Develin, R (1975). "Comitia tributa plebis". Athenaeum; Pavia. 53: 302–338 – via Proquest.
  13. 1 2 Drogula, Fred K (2017). "Plebeian Tribunes and the Government of Early Rome". Antichthon. 51: 110. doi:10.1017/ann.2017.8. S2CID   149208490.
  14. ↑ The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Lintott, Andrew. Oxford University Press. 1999. ISBN   1-280-76406-6. OCLC   814476467.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  15. 1 2 Abbott, 397
  16. ↑ Abbott, 35
  17. ↑ Abbott, 50
  18. ↑ Abbott, 51
  19. 1 2 Abbott, 52
  20. 1 2 3 Abbott, 53
  21. 1 2 Drogula, Fred K (2017). "Plebeian Tribunes and the Government of Early Rome". Antichthon. 51: 110. doi:10.1017/ann.2017.8. S2CID   149208490.
  22. 1 2 3 4 The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Lintott, Andrew. Oxford University Press. 1999. ISBN   1-280-76406-6. OCLC   814476467.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  23. 1 2 The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Lintott, Andrew. Oxford University Press. 1999. ISBN   1-280-76406-6. OCLC   814476467.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  24. ↑ Farrell, Joseph (1986-01-01). "The Distinction Between Comitia and Concilium". Athenaeum. 64: 407–438.
  25. 1 2 3 Drogula, Fred K (2017). "Plebeian Tribunes and the Government of Early Rome". Antichthon. 51: 110. doi:10.1017/ann.2017.8. S2CID   149208490.
  26. 1 2 3 Develin, R (1975). "Comitia tributa plebis". Athenaeum; Pavia. 53: 302–338 – via Proquest.
  27. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Farrell, Joseph (1986-01-01). "The Distinction Between Comitia and Concilium". Athenaeum. 64: 407–438.
  28. 1 2 3 4 Drogula, Fred K (2017). "Plebeian Tribunes and the Government of Early Rome". Antichthon. 51: 110. doi:10.1017/ann.2017.8. S2CID   149208490.

Further reading

Primary sources

Secondary source material

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.