Proxima Centauri b

Proxima Centauri b

Artist's conception of Proxima Centauri b as a terrestrial exoplanet, with Proxima Centauri and the Alpha Centauri system visible in the background. The actual appearance and composition of the exoplanet beyond this data is currently unknown.
Discovery
Discovered by	Anglada-Escudé et al.
Discovery site	European Southern Observatory
Discovery date	24 August 2016
Detection method	Doppler spectroscopy
Orbital characteristics [1]
Semi-major axis	0.04856±0.00030  AU
Eccentricity	0.02+0.04 −0.02
Orbital period (sidereal)	11.1868+0.0029 −0.0031  d
Argument of periastron	3.3+1.8 −2.3  radians
Semi-amplitude	1.24 ± 0.07 m/s
Star	Proxima Centauri
Physical characteristics
Mean radius	0.94–1.4 R🜨 [2] [a]
Mass	≥1.07±0.06  M🜨 [1]
Temperature	Teq: 234 K (−39 °C; −38 °F) [3]

Proxima Centauri b is an exoplanet orbiting within the habitable zone of the red dwarf star Proxima Centauri in the constellation Centaurus. It can also be referred to as Proxima b, ^[4] or Alpha Centauri Cb. The host star is the closest star to the Sun, at a distance of about 4.2 light-years (1.3 parsecs ) from Earth, and is part of the larger triple star system Alpha Centauri. Proxima b and Proxima d, along with the currently disputed Proxima c, are the closest known exoplanets to the Solar System.

Proxima Centauri b orbits its parent star at a distance of about 0.04856 AU (7.264 million km; 4.514 million mi) with an orbital period of approximately 11.2 Earth days. Its other properties are only poorly understood as of 2025 ^[update] , but it is a potentially Earth-like planet with a minimum mass of 1.07  M_🜨 and a slightly larger radius than that of Earth. The planet orbits within the habitable zone of its parent star; but it is not known whether it has an atmosphere, which would impact the habitability probabilities. Proxima Centauri is a flare star with intense emission of electromagnetic radiation that could strip an atmosphere off the planet.

Announced on 24 August 2016 by the European Southern Observatory (ESO), Proxima Centauri b was confirmed via several years of Doppler spectroscopy measurements of its parent star. The detection of Proxima Centauri b was a major discovery in planetology, ^[5] and has drawn interest to the Alpha Centauri star system as a whole. ^[6] As of 2023, Proxima Centauri b is believed to be the best-known exoplanet to the general public. ^[7] The exoplanet's proximity to Earth offers an opportunity for robotic space exploration.

Discovery

Velocity of Proxima Centauri towards and away from the Earth as measured with the HARPS spectrograph during the first three months of 2016. The red symbols with black error bars represent data points, and the blue curve is a fit of the data. The amplitude and period of the motion were used to estimate the planet's minimum mass.

Proxima Centauri had become a target for exoplanet searches already before the discovery of Proxima Centauri b, but initial studies in 2008 and 2009 ruled out the existence of larger-than-Earth exoplanets in the habitable zone. ^[8] Planets are very common around dwarf stars, with on average 1–2 planets per star, ^[9] and about 20–40% of all red dwarfs have one in the habitable zone. ^[10] Additionally, red dwarfs are by far the most common type of stars. ^[11]

Based on observations with instruments ^[b] at the European Southern Observatory in Chile prior to 2016, motion anomalies were identified in Proxima Centauri ^[12] that could not be satisfactorily explained by flares ^[c] or chromospheric ^[d] activity of the star. This suggested that Proxima Centauri may be orbited by an exoplanet. In January 2016, a team of astronomers launched the Pale Red Dot project to confirm this hypothetical exoplanet's existence. On 24 August 2016, the team led by Anglada-Escudé proposed that a terrestrial exoplanet in the habitable zone of Proxima Centauri could explain these anomalies and announced Proxima Centauri b's discovery. ^[3]

In 2022, the exoplanet Proxima Centauri d, which orbits even closer to the star, was confirmed. ^[15] An exoplanet candidate named Proxima Centauri c was reported in 2020, ^[16] but its existence has since been disputed due to potential artifacts in the data. ^[17] The claimed existence of a dust belt around Proxima Centauri remains unconfirmed. ^[18]

Physical properties

Overview and comparison of the orbital distance of the habitable zones of Proxima Centauri compared to the Solar System

Distance, orbital parameters and age

Proxima Centauri b is the closest exoplanet to Earth, ^[19] at a distance of about 4.2  ly (1.3 parsecs). ^[4] It orbits Proxima Centauri every 11.186 Earth days at a distance of about 0.049  AU , ^[1] over 20 times closer to Proxima Centauri than Earth is to the Sun. ^[20] As of 2021 ^[update] , it is unclear whether it has an eccentricity ^{[e] [23]} but Proxima Centauri b is unlikely to have any obliquity. ^[24] The age of the planet is unknown; ^[25] Proxima Centauri itself may have been captured by Alpha Centauri and thus not necessarily of the same age as the latter pair of stars, which are about 5 billion years old. ^[18] Proxima Centauri b is unlikely to have stable orbits for moons. ^[26]

Mass, radius and composition

As of 2020 ^[update] , the estimated minimum mass of Proxima Centauri b is 1.173±0.086  M_🜨 ; ^[5] other estimates are similar, ^[27] with the most recent estimate as of 2022 being at least 1.07±0.06  M_🜨 , ^[1] but all estimates are minimum because the inclination of the planet's orbit is not yet known. ^[18] This makes it similar to Earth, but the radius of the planet is poorly known and hard to determine—estimates based on possible composition give a range of 0.94 to 1.4 R_🜨, ^{[2] [28]} and its mass may border on the cutoff between Earth-type and Neptune-type planets, if that value is lower than previously estimated. ^[9] Depending on the composition, Proxima Centauri b could range from being a Mercury-like planet with a large core—which would require particular conditions early in the planet's history—to a very water-rich planet. Observations of the Fe–Si–Mg ratios of Proxima Centauri may allow a determination of the composition of the planet, ^[29] since they are expected to roughly match the ratios of any planetary bodies in the Proxima Centauri system; various observations have found Solar System-like ratios of these elements. ^[30]

Little is known about Proxima Centauri b as of 2021 ^[update] —mainly its distance from the star and its orbital period ^[31] —but a number of simulations of its physical properties have been done. ^[18] A number of simulations and models have been created that assume Earth-like compositions ^[32] and include predictions of the galactic environment, internal heat generation from radioactive decay and magnetic induction heating, ^[f] planetary rotation, the effects of stellar radiation, the amount of volatile species the planet consists of and the changes of these parameters over time. ^[30]

Proxima Centauri b likely developed under different conditions from Earth, with less water, stronger impacts and an overall faster development, assuming that it formed at its current distance from the star. ^[35] Proxima Centauri b probably did not form at its current distance to Proxima Centauri, as the amount of material in the protoplanetary disk would be insufficient. Instead, the planet, or protoplanetary fragments, likely formed at larger distances and then migrated to the current orbit of Proxima Centauri b. Depending on the nature of the precursor material, it may be rich in volatiles. ^[3] A number of different formation scenarios are possible, many of which depend on the existence of other planets around Proxima Centauri and which would result in different compositions. ^[36]

Tidal locking

Proxima Centauri b is likely to be tidally locked to the host star, ^[26] which for a 1:1 orbit would mean that the same side of the planet would always face Proxima Centauri. ^[25] It is unclear whether habitable conditions can arise under such circumstances ^[37] as a 1:1 tidal lock would lead to an extreme climate with only part of the planet habitable. ^[25]

However, the planet may not be tidally locked. If the eccentricity of Proxima Centauri b was higher than 0.1 ^[38] –0.06, it would tend to enter a Mercury-like 3:2 resonance ^[g] or higher-order resonances such as 2:1. ^[39] Additional planets around Proxima Centauri and interactions ^[h] with Alpha Centauri could excite higher eccentricies. ^[40] If the planet is not symmetrical (triaxial), a capture into a non-tidally locked orbit would be possible even with low eccentricity. ^[41] A non-locked orbit, however, would result in tidal heating of the planet's mantle, increasing volcanic activity and potentially shutting down a magnetic field-generating dynamo. ^[42] The exact dynamics are strongly dependent on the internal structure of the planet and its evolution in response to tidal heating. ^[43]

Host star

An angular size comparison of how Proxima will appear in the sky seen from Proxima b (96'), compared with how the Sun appears in our sky on Earth (32'). Proxima is much smaller than the Sun, but Proxima b is very close to its star.

Main article: Proxima Centauri

Proxima b's parent star Proxima Centauri is a red dwarf, ^[39] radiating only 0.005% of the amount of visible light that the Sun does and an average of about 0.17% of the Sun's energy. ^[44] Despite this low radiation, due to its close orbit Proxima Centauri b still receives about 70% of the amount of infrared energy that the Earth receives from the Sun. ^[44] That said, Proxima Centauri is also a flare star with its luminosity at times varying by a factor of 100 over a timespan of hours, ^[45] its luminosity averaged at 0.155±0.006  L_☉ . ^[3]

Proxima Centauri has 12.2% of the Sun's mass and 15.4% of the radius of the Sun. ^[46] With an effective temperature ^[i] of 3,050±100  Kelvin , it has a spectral type ^[j] of M5.5V, making it an M-type main-sequence star that is fusing hydrogen at its core to generate energy. The magnetic field of Proxima Centauri is considerably stronger than that of the Sun, with an intensity of 600±150  G ; ^[49] it varies in a seven-year-long cycle. ^{[50] [51]}

It is the closest star to the Sun, hence the name "Proxima", ^[6] with a distance of 4.2426 ± 0.0020 light-years (1.3008 ± 0.0006 pc). Proxima Centauri is part of a multiple star system, whose other members are Alpha Centauri A and Alpha Centauri B which form a binary star subsystem. ^[52] The dynamics of the multiple star system could have caused Proxima Centauri b to move closer to its host star over its history. ^[53] The detection of a planet around Alpha Centauri in 2012 was considered questionable. ^[52] Despite its proximity to Earth, Proxima Centauri is too faint to be visible to the naked eye, ^[8] except during superflares. ^[54]

Surface conditions

Climate

Artist's conception of the surface of Proxima Centauri b. The Alpha Centauri AB binary system can be seen in the distance, to the upper right of Proxima.

Proxima Centauri b is located within the classical habitable zone of its star ^[55] and receives about 65% of Earth's irradiation. Its equilibrium temperature is estimated to be about 234 K (−39 °C; −38 °F). ^[3] Various factors, such as the orbital properties of Proxima Centauri b, the spectrum of radiation emitted by Proxima Centauri ^[k] and the behaviour of clouds ^[l] and hazes influence the climate of an atmosphere-bearing Proxima Centauri b. ^[60]

There are two likely scenarios for an atmosphere of Proxima Centauri b: in one case, the planet's water could have condensed and the hydrogen would have been lost to space, which would have only left oxygen and/or carbon dioxide in the atmosphere after the planet's early history. However, it is also possible that Proxima Centauri b had a primordial hydrogen atmosphere or formed farther away from its star, which would have reduced the escape of water. ^[61] Thus, Proxima Centauri b may have kept its water beyond its early history. ^[53] If an atmosphere exists, it is likely to contain oxygen-bearing gases such as oxygen and carbon dioxide. Together with the star's magnetic activity, they would give rise to auroras that could be observed from Earth ^[62] if the planet has a magnetic field. ^[63]

Climate models including general circulation models used for Earth climate ^[64] have been used to simulate the properties of Proxima Centauri b's atmosphere. Depending on its properties such as whether it is tidally locked, the amount of water and carbon dioxide a number of scenarios are possible: A planet partially or wholly covered with ice, planet-wide or small oceans or only dry land, combinations between these, ^[65] scenarios with one or two "eyeballs" ^{[m] [67]} or lobster-shaped areas with liquid water (meaning near the equator, with two nearly identical areas on each hemisphere, sprouting from the equator like lobster claws), ^[68] or a subsurface ocean ^[69] with a thin (less than a kilometre) ice cover that may be slushy in some places. ^[70] Additional factors are:

• The nature of convection. ^[71]
• The distribution of continents, which can sustain a carbonate-silicate cycle and thus stabilize the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. ^[72]
• The effects of galactic cosmic rays, which are expected to be more significant around Proxima Centauri b than around Earth. ^[73]
• Ocean heat transport which broadens the space for habitable climates. ^[67]
• Ocean salinity variations that alter the properties of an ocean. ^[67]
• Ozone chemistry, which can increase the stratospheric temperature and influence surface temperatures. ^[28]
• The rotational period of the planet which determines Rossby wave dynamics. ^[74]
• Internal heat flow which can melt the bases of ice sheets. ^[75]
• Sea ice dynamics which could cause a global ocean to freeze over. ^[76]

Stability of an atmosphere

The stability of an atmosphere is a major issue for the habitability of Proxima Centauri b: ^[77]

• Strong irradiation by UV radiation and X-rays from Proxima Centauri constitutes a challenge to habitability. ^[19] Proxima Centauri b receives about 10–60 times as much of this radiation ^[55] especially X-rays, as Earth. ^[78] It might have received even more in the past, ^[79] adding up to 7–16 times as much cumulative XUV radiation than Earth. ^[80] UV radiation and X-rays can effectively evaporate an atmosphere ^[20] since hydrogen readily absorbs the radiation and does not readily lose it again, thus warming until the speed of hydrogen atoms and molecules is sufficient to escape from the gravitational field of a planet. ^[81] They can remove water by splitting it into hydrogen and oxygen and heating the hydrogen in the planet's exosphere until it escapes. The hydrogen can drag other elements such as oxygen ^[82] and nitrogen away. ^[83] Nitrogen and carbon dioxide can escape on their own from an atmosphere but this process is unlikely to substantially reduce the nitrogen and carbon dioxide content of an Earth-like planet. ^[84]
• Stellar winds and coronal mass ejections are an even bigger threat to an atmosphere. ^[20] The amount of stellar wind impacting Proxima Centauri b may amount to 4–80 times that impacting Earth, ^[80] with a pressure about ten thousand times larger than the Sun's stellar wind. ^[85] The more intense UV and X-rays radiation could lift the planet's atmosphere to outside of the magnetic field, increasing the loss triggered by stellar wind and mass ejections. ^[86] A planet like Proxima Centauri b might develop an internal structure that precludes the existence of strong planetary magnetic fields. ^[87]
• At Proxima Centauri b's distance from the star, the stellar wind is likely to be denser than around Earth by a factor of 10–1,000 depending on the strength ^[88] and stage (Proxima Centauri has a seven-year-long magnetic cycle) of Proxima Centauri's magnetic field. ^[89] As of 2018 ^[update] it is unknown whether the planet has a magnetic field ^[19] and the upper atmosphere may have its own magnetic field. ^[86] Depending on the intensity of Proxima Centauri b's magnetic field, the stellar wind can penetrate deep into the atmosphere of the planet and strip parts of it off, ^[90] with substantial variability over daily and annual timescales. ^[88]
• If the planet is tidally locked to the star, the atmosphere can collapse on the night side. ^[91] This is particularly a risk for a carbon dioxide-dominated atmosphere although carbon dioxide glaciers could recycle. ^[92]
• Unlike Sun-like stars, Proxima Centauri's habitable zone would have been farther away early in the system's existence ^[93] when the star was in its pre-main sequence ^[n] stage. ^[94] In the case of Proxima Centauri, assuming that the planet formed in its current orbit it could have spent up to 180 million years too close to its star for water to condense. ^[53] Proxima Centauri b may therefore have suffered a runaway greenhouse effect, in which the planet's water would have evaporated into steam, ^[95] which would then have been split into hydrogen and oxygen by UV radiation. The hydrogen and thus any water would have subsequently been lost, ^[53] similar to what is believed to have happened to Venus. ^[96]
• While the characteristics of impact events on Proxima Centauri b are currently entirely conjectural, they could destabilize the atmospheres ^[97] and boil off oceans. ^[16]
• An ice-covered Proxima Centauri b with a subsurface ocean is expected to have cryovolcanic activity at rates comparable to volcanism on Jupiter's moon Io. ^[69] The cryovolcanism would generate a thin exosphere comparable to that of Jupiter's other moon Europa. ^[98]

Even if Proxima Centauri b lost its original atmosphere, volcanic activity could rebuild it after some time. A second atmosphere would likely contain carbon dioxide, ^[37] which would make it more stable than an Earth-like atmosphere, ^[30] particularly in the presence of an ocean, which, depending on its size, as well as the atmospheric mass and composition, may contribute to preventing atmospheric collapse. ^[42] Additionally, impacts of exocomets could resupply water to Proxima Centauri b, if they are present. ^[99]

Delivery of water to Proxima Centauri b

A number of mechanisms can deliver water to a developing planet; how much water Proxima Centauri b received is unknown. ^[35] Modelling by Ribas et al. 2016 indicates that Proxima Centauri b would have lost no more than one Earth ocean's equivalent of water ^[19] but later research suggested that the amount of water lost could be considerably larger ^[100] and Airapetian et al. 2017 concluded that an atmosphere would be lost within ten million years. ^[101] The estimates are strongly dependent on the initial mass of the atmosphere, however, and are thus highly uncertain. ^[42]

Possibility of life

See also: Habitability of red dwarf systems

In the context of exoplanet research, "habitability" is usually defined as the possibility that liquid water exists on the surface of a planet. ^[61] As normally understood in the context of exoplanet life, liquid water on the surface and an atmosphere are prerequisites for habitability—any life limited to the subsurface of a planet, ^[93] such as in a subsurface ocean, like those that reside in Europa in the Solar System, would be difficult to detect from afar ^[94] although it may constitute a model for life in a cold ocean-covered Proxima Centauri b. ^[102]

Setbacks to habitability

The habitability of red dwarfs is a controversial subject, ^[25] with a number of considerations:

• Both the activity of Proxima Centauri and tidal locking would hinder the establishment of these conditions on the planet. ^[3]
• Unlike XUV radiation, UV radiation on Proxima Centauri b is redder (colder) and thus may interact less with organic compounds ^[103] and may produce less ozone. ^[104] Conversely, stellar activity could deplete an ozone layer sufficiently to increase UV radiation to dangerous levels. ^{[42] [105]}
• Depending on its eccentricity, it may partially lie outside of the habitable zone during part of its orbit. ^[25]
• Oxygen ^[106] and/or carbon monoxide may build up in the atmosphere of Proxima Centauri b to toxic quantities. ^[107] High oxygen concentrations may, however, aid in the evolution of complex organisms. ^[106]
• If oceans are present, the tides could lead to the flooding and drying of coastal landscapes, triggering chemical reactions conducive to the development of life, ^[108] favour the evolution of biological rhythms such as the day-night cycle which otherwise would not develop in a tidally locked planet without a day-night cycle, ^[109] mix oceans and supply and redistribute nutrients ^[110] and stimulate periodic expansions of marine organisms such as red tides on Earth. ^[111]

On the other hand, red dwarfs like Proxima Centauri have a lifespan much longer than the Sun, exceeding the estimated age of the Universe, and thus give life plenty of time to develop. ^[112] The radiation emitted by Proxima Centauri is ill-suited for oxygen-generating photosynthesis but sufficient for anoxygenic photosynthesis ^[113] although it is unclear how life depending on anoxygenic photosynthesis could be detected. ^[114] One study in 2017 estimated that the productivity of a Proxima Centauri b ecosystem based on photosynthesis may be about 20% that of Earth's. ^[115]

Observation and exploration

As of 2021 ^[update] , Proxima Centauri b has not yet been directly imaged, as its separation from Proxima Centauri is too small. ^[116] It is unlikely to transit Proxima Centauri from Earth's perspective; ^{[o] [117]} all surveys have failed to find evidence for any transits of Proxima Centauri b. ^{[118] [119]} The star is monitored for the possible emission of technology-related radio signals by the Breakthrough Listen project which in April–May 2019 detected the BLC1 signal; later investigations, however, indicated it is probably of human origin. ^[120]

Future large ground-based telescopes and space-based observatories such as the James Webb Space Telescope and the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope could directly observe Proxima Centauri b, given its proximity to Earth, ^[20] but disentangling the planet from its star would be difficult. ^[37] Possible traits observable from Earth are the reflection of starlight from an ocean, ^[121] the radiative patterns of atmospheric gases and hazes ^[122] and of atmospheric heat transport. ^{[p] [123]} Efforts have been done to determine what Proxima Centauri b would look like to Earth if it has particular properties such as atmospheres of a particular composition. ^[31]

Even the fastest spacecraft built by humans would take a long time to travel interstellar distances; Voyager 2 would take about 75,000 years to reach Proxima Centauri. Among the proposed technologies to reach Proxima Centauri b in human lifespans are solar sails that could reach speeds of 20% the speed of light; problems would be how to decelerate a probe when it arrives in the Proxima Centauri system ^[124] and collisions of the high-speed probes with interstellar particles. ^[125] Among the projects of travelling to Proxima Centauri b are the Breakthrough Starshot project, which aims to develop instruments and power systems that can reach Proxima Centauri in the 21st century. ^[126]

View from Proxima Centauri b

From the surface of Proxima Centauri b, the binary stars Alpha Centauri would be considerably brighter than Venus is from Earth, ^[127] with an apparent magnitude of −6.8 and −5.2, respectively. ^[44] The Sun would appear as a bright star with an apparent magnitude of 0.40 in the constellation of Cassiopeia. The brightness of the Sun would be similar to that of Achernar or Procyon from Earth. ^[q]

View from Earth

• 
  Looking towards the sky around Orion from Alpha Centauri with Sirius near Betelgeuse, Procyon in Gemini, and the Sun between Perseus and Cassiopeia generated by Celestia
• 
  The relative sizes of a number of objects, including the three stars of the Alpha Centauri triple system and some other stars for which the angular sizes have also been measured. The Sun and Jupiter are also shown for comparison.
• 
  This chart shows the large southern constellation of Centaurus (the Centaur) and shows most of the stars visible with the naked eye on a clear dark night. The location of the closest star to the Solar System, Proxima Centauri, is marked with a red circle. Proxima Centauri is too faint to see with the unaided eye but can be found using a small telescope.
• 
  This picture combines a view of the southern skies over the ESO 3.6-metre telescope at the La Silla Observatory in Chile with images of the stars Proxima Centauri (lower-right) and the double star Alpha Centauri AB (lower-left) from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope. Proxima Centauri is the closest star to the Solar System and is orbited by the planet Proxima b.

Videos

• A numerical simulation of possible surface temperatures on Proxima b performed with the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique's Planetary Global Climate Model. Here it is hypothesized that the planet possesses an Earth-like atmosphere and that it is covered by an ocean (the dashed line is the frontier between the liquid and icy oceanic surface). Two models were produced for the planet's rotation. Here the planet is in a so-called 3:2 resonance (a natural frequency for the orbit), and is seen as a distant observer would do during one full orbit.
• A numerical simulation of possible surface temperatures. Here it is hypothesized that the planet possesses an Earth-like atmosphere and that it is covered by an ocean (the dashed line is the frontier between the liquid and icy oceanic surface). Here the planet is in synchronous rotation (like the Moon around the Earth), and is seen as a distant observer would do during one full orbit.

See also

• Alpha Centauri Bb – exoplanet once proposed to be orbiting the secondary star of the system, Alpha Centauri B, and was dubbed the closest exoplanet for a while before being disproven
• Astrobiology
• Extremely large telescope
• Exoplanet orbital and physical parameters
• List of potentially habitable exoplanets

Notes

1. Range of possible radius values, depending on Proxima b's composition
2. The Ultraviolet and Visual Echelle Spectrograph and the High Accuracy Radial Velocity Planet Searcher. ^[12]
3. Flares are presumably magnetic phenomena during which for minutes and hours parts of the star emit more radiation than usual. ^[13]
4. The chromosphere is an outer layer of a star. ^[14]
5. Proxima Centauri b's eccentricity is constrained to be less than 0.35 ^[3] and later observations have indicated eccentricities of 0.08+0.07
   −0.06, ^[21] 0.17+0.21
   −0.12 and 0.105+0.091
   −0.068 ^[22]
6. Tides may result in internal heating in Proxima Centauri b; depending on the eccentricity Io-like values with intense volcanic activity or Earth-like values could be reached. ^[33] The magnetic field of the star can also induce intense heating of the planet's interior, ^[30] especially early in its history. ^[34]
7. A 3:2 ratio of the planet's rotation and its orbit around the star. ^[25]
8. The tides excited by Alpha Centauri could have induced an eccentricity of 0.1. ^[33]
9. The effective temperature is the temperature a black body that emits the same amount of radiation would have. ^[47]
10. A spectral type is a scheme to categorize stars by their temperature. ^[48]
11. The radiation of a red dwarf is much less effectively reflected by snow, ice ^[39] and clouds ^[56] although—in the case of ice—the formation of salt-bearing ice (hydrohalite) could offset this effect. ^[57] It also does not as readily degrade trace gases like methane, dinitrogen monoxide and methyl chloride as the Sun's. ^[58]
12. For example, cloud accumulation below the star in the case of a tidally locked planet ^[41] stabilizes the climate by increasing the reflection of starlight. ^[59]
13. One or multiple areas of liquid water surrounded by ice. ^[66]
14. Red dwarfs like Proxima Centauri are brighter before they enter the main sequence of stars. ^[53]
15. The probability is about 1.5%. ^[31]
16. If there is an atmosphere or ocean and Proxima Centauri b is tidally locked, an atmosphere or an ocean would tend to redistribute heat from the day side to the night side and this would be visible from Earth.
17. The coordinates of the Sun would be diametrically opposite Proxima Centauri, at α=02^h 29^m 42.9487^s, δ=+62° 40′ 46.141″. The absolute magnitude M_v of the Sun is 4.83, so at a parallax π of 0.77199 the apparent magnitude m is given by 4.83 − 5(log₁₀(0.77199) + 1) = 0.40.

References

1. Faria et al. 2022, p. 16.
2. Brugger et al. 2016, p. 1.
3. Anglada-Escudé et al. 2016, p. 438.
4. Turbet et al. 2016, p. 1.
5. Mascareño et al. 2020, p. 1.
6. Quarles & Lissauer 2018, p. 1.
7. Mieli, Valli & Maccone 2023, p. 435.
8. Kipping et al. 2017, p. 1.
9. Kipping et al. 2017, p. 2.
10. Wandel 2017, p. 498.
11. Meadows et al. 2018, p. 133.
12. Anglada-Escudé et al. 2016, p. 437.
13. Güdel 2014, p. 9.
14. Güdel 2014, p. 6.
15. Faria et al. 2022, p. 10.
16. Siraj & Loeb 2020, p. 1.
17. Artigau et al. 2022, p. 1.
18. Noack et al. 2021, p. 1.
19. Schulze-Makuch & Irwin 2018, p. 240.
20. Garraffo, Drake & Cohen 2016, p. 1.
21. Walterová & Běhounková 2020, p. 13.
22. Mascareño et al. 2020, p. 8.
23. Noack et al. 2021, p. 9.
24. Garraffo, Drake & Cohen 2016, p. 2.
25. Ritchie, Larkum & Ribas 2018, p. 148.
26. Kreidberg & Loeb 2016, p. 2.
27. Mascareño et al. 2020, p. 7.
28. De Luca et al. 2024, p. 1481.
29. Brugger et al. 2016, p. 4.
30. Noack et al. 2021, p. 2.
31. Galuzzo et al. 2021, p. 1.
32. Zuluaga & Bustamante 2018, p. 55.
33. Ribas et al. 2016, p. 8.
34. Quick et al. 2023, p. 13.
35. Ribas et al. 2016, p. 3.
36. Coleman et al. 2017, p. 1007.
37. Snellen et al. 2017, p. 2.
38. Walterová & Běhounková 2020, p. 18.
39. Turbet et al. 2016, p. 2.
40. Meadows et al. 2018, p. 138.
41. Ribas et al. 2016, p. 10.
42. Meadows et al. 2018, p. 136.
43. Walterová & Běhounková 2020, p. 22.
44. Siegel 2016.
45. Ribas et al. 2016, p. 4.
46. Kervella, Thévenin & Lovis 2017, p. 3.
47. Rouan 2014b, p. 1.
48. Ekström 2014, p. 1.
49. Anglada-Escudé et al. 2016, p. 439.
50. Garraffo, Drake & Cohen 2016, p. 4.
51. Engelbrecht et al. 2024, p. 14.
52. Liu et al. 2017, p. 1.
53. Meadows et al. 2018, p. 135.
54. Howard et al. 2018, p. 2.
55. Ribas et al. 2016, p. 5.
56. Eager et al. 2020, p. 10.
57. Shields & Carns 2018, p. 7.
58. Chen & Horton 2018, p. 148.13.
59. Sergeev et al. 2020, p. 1.
60. Meadows et al. 2018, p. 137.
61. Meadows et al. 2018, p. 134.
62. Luger et al. 2017, p. 2.
63. Luger et al. 2017, p. 7.
64. Boutle et al. 2017, p. 1.
65. Turbet et al. 2016, p. 3.
66. Del Genio et al. 2019, p. 114.
67. Del Genio et al. 2019, p. 100.
68. Del Genio et al. 2019, p. 103.
69. Quick et al. 2023, p. 9.
70. Quick et al. 2023, pp. 10–11.
71. Sergeev et al. 2020, p. 6.
72. Lewis et al. 2018, p. 2.
73. Engelbrecht et al. 2024, pp. 11–12.
74. Del Genio et al. 2019, p. 101.
75. Ojha et al. 2022, p. 3.
76. Yang & Ji 2018, p. P43G–3826.
77. Howard et al. 2018, p. 1.
78. Ribas et al. 2016, p. 15.
79. Ribas et al. 2016, p. 6.
80. Ribas et al. 2016, p. 7.
81. Zahnle & Catling 2017, p. 6.
82. Ribas et al. 2016, p. 11.
83. Ribas et al. 2016, p. 12.
84. Ribas et al. 2016, p. 13.
85. Garraffo et al. 2022, p. 1.
86. Ribas et al. 2016, p. 14.
87. Atkinson, Alexander & Farrish 2024, p. 6.
88. Garraffo, Drake & Cohen 2016, p. 5.
89. Garraffo et al. 2022, p. 7.
90. Garraffo, Drake & Cohen 2016, p. 3.
91. Kreidberg & Loeb 2016, p. 1.
92. Turbet et al. 2016, p. 5.
93. Ribas et al. 2016, p. 1.
94. Snellen et al. 2017, p. 1.
95. Zahnle & Catling 2017, p. 10.
96. Ribas et al. 2016, p. 2.
97. Zahnle & Catling 2017, p. 11.
98. Quick et al. 2023, p. 12.
99. Schwarz et al. 2018, p. 3606.
100. Ribas et al. 2017, p. 11.
101. Brugger et al. 2017, p. 7.
102. Del Genio et al. 2019, p. 117.
103. Ribas et al. 2017, p. 1.
104. Boutle et al. 2017, p. 3.
105. Howard et al. 2018, p. 6.
106. Lingam 2020, p. 5.
107. Schwieterman et al. 2019, p. 5.
108. Lingam & Loeb 2018, pp. 969–970.
109. Lingam & Loeb 2018, p. 971.
110. Lingam & Loeb 2018, p. 972.
111. Lingam & Loeb 2018, p. 975.
112. Ritchie, Larkum & Ribas 2018, p. 147.
113. Ritchie, Larkum & Ribas 2018, p. 168.
114. Ritchie, Larkum & Ribas 2018, p. 169.
115. Lehmer et al. 2018, p. 2.
116. Galuzzo et al. 2021, p. 6.
117. Kipping et al. 2017, p. 14.
118. Jenkins et al. 2019, p. 274.
119. Gilbert et al. 2021, p. 10.
120. Sheikh et al. 2021, p. 1153.
121. Meadows et al. 2018, p. 139.
122. Meadows et al. 2018, p. 140.
123. Kreidberg & Loeb 2016, p. 5.
124. Heller & Hippke 2017, p. 1.
125. Heller & Hippke 2017, p. 4.
126. Beech 2017, p. 253.
127. Hanslmeier 2021, p. 270.

Sources

• Anglada-Escudé, Guillem; Amado, Pedro J.; Barnes, John; Berdiñas, Zaira M.; Butler, R. Paul; Coleman, Gavin A. L.; de la Cueva, Ignacio; Dreizler, Stefan; Endl, Michael; Giesers, Benjamin; Jeffers, Sandra V.; Jenkins, James S.; Jones, Hugh R. A.; Kiraga, Marcin; Kürster, Martin; López-González, Marίa J.; Marvin, Christopher J.; Morales, Nicolás; Morin, Julien; Nelson, Richard P.; Ortiz, José L.; Ofir, Aviv; Paardekooper, Sijme-Jan; Reiners, Ansgar; Rodríguez, Eloy; Rodrίguez-López, Cristina; Sarmiento, Luis F.; Strachan, John P.; Tsapras, Yiannis; Tuomi, Mikko; Zechmeister, Mathias (August 2016). "A terrestrial planet candidate in a temperate orbit around Proxima Centauri". Nature. 536 (7617): 437–440. arXiv: 1609.03449 . Bibcode:2016Natur.536..437A. doi:10.1038/nature19106. ISSN   1476-4687. PMID   27558064. S2CID   4451513.
• Artigau, Étienne; Cadieux, Charles; Cook, Neil J.; Doyon, René; Vandal, Thomas; et al. (23 June 2022). "Line-by-line velocity measurements, an outlier-resistant method for precision velocimetry". The Astronomical Journal. 164:84 (3) (published 8 August 2022): 18pp. arXiv: 2207.13524 . Bibcode:2022AJ....164...84A. doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac7ce6 .
• Atkinson, Anthony S.; Alexander, David; Farrish, Alison O. (1 July 2024). "Exploring the Effects of Stellar Magnetism on the Potential Habitability of Exoplanets". The Astrophysical Journal. 969 (2): 147. Bibcode:2024ApJ...969..147A. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4605 .
• Beech, Martin (2017), "It's a Far Flung Life", The Pillars of Creation, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 235–256, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48775-5_6, ISBN   978-3-319-48774-8 , retrieved 17 November 2021
• Boutle, Ian A.; Mayne, Nathan J.; Drummond, Benjamin; Manners, James; Goyal, Jayesh; Lambert, F. Hugo; Acreman, David M.; Earnshaw, Paul D. (1 May 2017). "Exploring the climate of Proxima B with the Met Office Unified Model". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 601: A120. arXiv: 1702.08463 . Bibcode:2017A&A...601A.120B. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630020. hdl:10871/26089. ISSN   0004-6361. S2CID   55136396.
• Brugger, B.; Mousis, O.; Deleuil, M.; Lunine, J. I. (3 November 2016). "Possible Internal Structures and Compositions of Proxima Centauri b". The Astrophysical Journal. 831 (2): L16. arXiv: 1609.09757 . Bibcode:2016ApJ...831L..16B. doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/831/2/l16 . S2CID   119208249.
• Brugger, B.; Mousis, O.; Deleuil, M.; Deschamps, F. (November 2017). "Constraints on Super-Earth Interiors from Stellar Abundances". The Astrophysical Journal. 850 (1): 93. arXiv: 1710.09776 . Bibcode:2017ApJ...850...93B. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa965a . ISSN   0004-637X. S2CID   119438782.
• Chen, Howard; Horton, Daniel (1 January 2018). "Modeled 3-D Biosignatures from the Stratospheres of Proxima Centauri b and M-dwarf Planets". American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #231. 231: 148.13. Bibcode:2018AAS...23114813C.
• Coleman, G. A. L.; Nelson, R. P.; Paardekooper, S. J.; Dreizler, S.; Giesers, B.; Anglada-Escudé, G. (20 January 2017). "Exploring plausible formation scenarios for the planet candidate orbiting Proxima Centauri". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: stx169. arXiv: 1608.06908 . doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx169 .
• Del Genio, Anthony D.; Way, Michael J.; Amundsen, David S.; Aleinov, Igor; Kelley, Maxwell; Kiang, Nancy Y.; Clune, Thomas L. (January 2019). "Habitable Climate Scenarios for Proxima Centauri b with a Dynamic Ocean". Astrobiology. 19 (1): 99–125. arXiv: 1709.02051 . Bibcode:2019AsBio..19...99D. doi:10.1089/ast.2017.1760. ISSN   1531-1074. PMID   30183335. S2CID   52165056.
• De Luca, P; Braam, M; Komacek, T D; Hochman, A (13 May 2024). "The impact of ozone on Earth-like exoplanet climate dynamics: the case of Proxima Centauri b". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 531 (1): 1471–1482. arXiv: 2404.17972 . doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1199 .
• Eager, Jake K.; Reichelt, David J.; Mayne, Nathan J.; Lambert, F. Hugo; Sergeev, Denis E.; Ridgway, Robert J.; Manners, James; Boutle, Ian A.; Lenton, Timothy M.; Kohary, Krisztian (1 July 2020). "Implications of different stellar spectra for the climate of tidally locked Earth-like exoplanets". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 639: A99. arXiv: 2005.13002 . Bibcode:2020A&A...639A..99E. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038089. ISSN   0004-6361. S2CID   218900900.
• Ekström, Sylvia (2014). "Spectral Type". Encyclopedia of Astrobiology. Springer. p. 1. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27833-4_1484-3. ISBN   978-3-642-27833-4.
• Engelbrecht, N. Eugene; Herbst, Konstantin; Strauss, R. Du Toit; Scherer, Klaus; Light, Juandre; Moloto, K. D. (1 March 2024). "On the Comprehensive 3D Modeling of the Radiation Environment of Proxima Centauri b: A New Constraint on Habitability?". The Astrophysical Journal. 964 (1): 89. Bibcode:2024ApJ...964...89E. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2ade .
• Faria, J. P.; Mascareño, A. Suárez; Figueira, P.; Silva, A. M.; Damasso, M.; Demangeon, O.; Pepe, F.; Santos, N. C.; Rebolo, R.; Cristiani, S.; Adibekyan, V.; Alibert, Y.; Allart, R.; Barros, S. C. C.; Cabral, A.; D’Odorico, V.; Marcantonio, P. Di; Dumusque, X.; Ehrenreich, D.; Hernández, J. I. González; Hara, N.; Lillo-Box, J.; Curto, G. Lo; Lovis, C.; Martins, C. J. a. P.; Mégevand, D.; Mehner, A.; Micela, G.; Molaro, P.; Nunes, N. J.; Pallé, E.; Poretti, E.; Sousa, S. G.; Sozzetti, A.; Tabernero, H.; Udry, S.; Osorio, M. R. Zapatero (1 February 2022). "A candidate short-period sub-Earth orbiting Proxima Centauri". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 658: A115. arXiv: 2202.05188 . Bibcode:2022A&A...658A.115F. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142337. ISSN   0004-6361. S2CID   246706321.
• Galuzzo, Daniele; Cagnazzo, Chiara; Berrilli, Francesco; Fierli, Federico; Giovannelli, Luca (1 March 2021). "Three-dimensional Climate Simulations for the Detectability of Proxima Centauri b". The Astrophysical Journal. 909 (2): 191. arXiv: 2102.03255 . Bibcode:2021ApJ...909..191G. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abdeb4 . S2CID   234356354.
• Garraffo, C.; Drake, J. J.; Cohen, O. (30 November 2016). "THE SPACE WEATHER OF PROXIMA CENTAURI b". The Astrophysical Journal. 833 (1): L4. arXiv: 1609.09076 . Bibcode:2016ApJ...833L...4G. doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/833/1/l4 . S2CID   118451685.
• Garraffo, Cecilia; Alvarado-Gómez, Julián D.; Cohen, Ofer; Drake, Jeremy J. (1 December 2022). "Revisiting the Space Weather Environment of Proxima Centauri b". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 941 (1): L8. arXiv: 2211.15697 . Bibcode:2022ApJ...941L...8G. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aca487 .
• Gilbert, Emily A.; Barclay, Thomas; Kruse, Ethan; Quintana, Elisa V.; Walkowicz, Lucianne M. (19 November 2021). "No Transits of Proxima Centauri Planets in High-Cadence TESS Data". Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences. 8: 190. arXiv: 2110.10702 . Bibcode:2021FrASS...8..190G. doi: 10.3389/fspas.2021.769371 . S2CID   239050000.
• Güdel, Manuel (2014). "Sun (And Young Sun)". Encyclopedia of Astrobiology. Springer. pp. 1–18. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27833-4_1542-5. ISBN   978-3-642-27833-4.
• Hanslmeier, Arnold (2021). "Leben im Universum?". Faszination Astronomie: Ein topaktueller Einstieg für alle naturwissenschaftlich Interessierten (in German). Springer. pp. 255–274. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-63590-2_9. ISBN   978-3-662-63590-2. S2CID   239084299.
• Heller, René; Hippke, Michael (1 February 2017). "Deceleration of High-velocity Interstellar Photon Sails into Bound Orbits at α Centauri". The Astrophysical Journal. 835 (2): L32. arXiv: 1701.08803 . Bibcode:2017ApJ...835L..32H. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/835/2/l32 . S2CID   118928945.
• Howard, Ward S.; Tilley, Matt A.; Corbett, Hank; Youngblood, Allison; Loyd, R. O. Parke; Ratzloff, Jeffrey K.; Law, Nicholas M.; Fors, Octavi; del Ser, Daniel; Shkolnik, Evgenya L.; Ziegler, Carl; Goeke, Erin E.; Pietraallo, Aaron D.; Haislip, Joshua (25 June 2018). "The First Naked-eye Superflare Detected from Proxima Centauri". The Astrophysical Journal. 860 (2): L30. arXiv: 1804.02001 . Bibcode:2018ApJ...860L..30H. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aacaf3 . S2CID   59127420.
• Jenkins, James S.; Harrington, Joseph; Challener, Ryan C.; Kurtovic, Nicolás T.; Ramirez, Ricardo; Peña, Jose; McIntyre, Kathleen J.; Himes, Michael D.; Rodríguez, Eloy; Anglada-Escudé, Guillem; Dreizler, Stefan; Ofir, Aviv; Rojas, Pablo A. Peña; Ribas, Ignasi; Rojo, Patricio; Kipping, David; Butler, R. Paul; Amado, Pedro J.; Rodríguez-López, Cristina; Kempton, Eliza M.-R.; Palle, Enric; Murgas, Felipe (11 May 2019). "Proxima Centauri b is not a transiting exoplanet". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 487 (1): 268–274. arXiv: 1905.01336 . Bibcode:2019MNRAS.487..268J. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1268 . S2CID   146121472.
• Kervella, P.; Thévenin, F.; Lovis, C. (2017). "Proxima's orbit around α Centauri". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 598: L7. arXiv: 1611.03495 . Bibcode:2017A&A...598L...7K. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629930. ISSN   0004-6361. S2CID   50867264.
• Kipping, David M.; Cameron, Chris; Hartman, Joel D.; Davenport, James R. A.; Matthews, Jaymie M.; Sasselov, Dimitar; Rowe, Jason; Siverd, Robert J.; Chen, Jingjing; Sandford, Emily; Bakos, Gáspár Á.; Jordán, Andrés; Bayliss, Daniel; Henning, Thomas; Mancini, Luigi; Penev, Kaloyan; Csubry, Zoltan; Bhatti, Waqas; Bento, Joao Da Silva; Guenther, David B.; Kuschnig, Rainer; Moffat, Anthony F. J.; Rucinski, Slavek M.; Weiss, Werner W. (2 February 2017). "No Conclusive Evidence for Transits of Proxima b in MOST Photometry". The Astronomical Journal. 153 (3): 93. arXiv: 1609.08718 . Bibcode:2017AJ....153...93K. doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/153/3/93 . hdl:1885/114519. S2CID   118735664.
• Kreidberg, Laura; Loeb, Abraham (14 November 2016). "Prospects for Characterizing the Atmosphere of Proxima Centauri b". The Astrophysical Journal. 832 (1): L12. arXiv: 1608.07345 . Bibcode:2016ApJ...832L..12K. doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/832/1/l12 . S2CID   55972396.
• Lehmer, Owen R.; Catling, David C.; Parenteau, Mary N.; Hoehler, Tori M. (5 June 2018). "The Productivity of Oxygenic Photosynthesis around Cool, M Dwarf Stars". The Astrophysical Journal. 859 (2): 171. Bibcode:2018ApJ...859..171L. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac104 . S2CID   126238790.
• Lewis, Neil T.; Lambert, F. Hugo; Boutle, Ian A.; Mayne, Nathan J.; Manners, James; Acreman, David M. (26 February 2018). "The Influence of a Substellar Continent on the Climate of a Tidally Locked Exoplanet". The Astrophysical Journal. 854 (2): 171. arXiv: 1802.00378 . Bibcode:2018ApJ...854..171L. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaad0a . hdl:10871/31278. S2CID   56158810.
• Lingam, Manasvi; Loeb, Abraham (July 2018). "Implications of Tides for Life on Exoplanets". Astrobiology. 18 (7): 967–982. arXiv: 1707.04594 . Bibcode:2018AsBio..18..967L. doi:10.1089/ast.2017.1718. ISSN   1531-1074. PMID   30010383. S2CID   51628150.
• Lingam, Manasvi (6 March 2020). "Implications of Abiotic Oxygen Buildup for Earth-like Complex Life". The Astronomical Journal. 159 (4): 144. arXiv: 2002.03248 . Bibcode:2020AJ....159..144L. doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab737f . S2CID   211069278.
• Liu, Hui-Gen; Jiang, Peng; Huang, Xingxing; Yu, Zhou-Yi; Yang, Ming; Jia, Minghao; Awiphan, Supachai; Pan, Xiang; Liu, Bo; Zhang, Hongfei; Wang, Jian; Li, Zhengyang; Du, Fujia; Li, Xiaoyan; Lu, Haiping; Zhang, Zhiyong; Tian, Qi-Guo; Li, Bin; Ji, Tuo; Zhang, Shaohua; Shi, Xiheng; Wang, Ji; Zhou, Ji-Lin; Zhou, Hongyan (12 December 2017). "Searching for the Transit of the Earth-mass Exoplanet Proxima Centauri b in Antarctica: Preliminary Result". The Astronomical Journal. 155 (1): 12. arXiv: 1711.07018 . Bibcode:2018AJ....155...12L. doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa9b86 . S2CID   54773928.
• Luger, Rodrigo; Lustig-Yaeger, Jacob; Fleming, David P.; Tilley, Matt A.; Agol, Eric; Meadows, Victoria S.; Deitrick, Russell; Barnes, Rory (3 March 2017). "The Pale Green Dot: A Method to Characterize Proxima Centauri b Using Exo-Aurorae". The Astrophysical Journal. 837 (1): 63. arXiv: 1609.09075 . Bibcode:2017ApJ...837...63L. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6040 . S2CID   119116641.
• Mascareño, A. Suárez; Faria, J. P.; Figueira, P.; Lovis, C.; Damasso, M.; Hernández, J. I. González; Rebolo, R.; Cristiani, S.; Pepe, F.; Santos, N. C.; Osorio, M. R. Zapatero; Adibekyan, V.; Hojjatpanah, S.; Sozzetti, A.; Murgas, F.; Abreu, M.; Affolter, M.; Alibert, Y.; Aliverti, M.; Allart, R.; Prieto, C. Allende; Alves, D.; Amate, M.; Avila, G.; Baldini, V.; Bandi, T.; Barros, S. C. C.; Bianco, A.; Benz, W.; Bouchy, F.; Broeng, C.; Cabral, A.; Calderone, G.; Cirami, R.; Coelho, J.; Conconi, P.; Coretti, I.; Cumani, C.; Cupani, G.; D’Odorico, V.; Deiries, S.; Delabre, B.; Marcantonio, P. Di; Dumusque, X.; Ehrenreich, D.; Fragoso, A.; Genolet, L.; Genoni, M.; Santos, R. Génova; Hughes, I.; Iwert, O.; Kerber, F.; Knusdstrup, J.; Landoni, M.; Lavie, B.; Lillo-Box, J.; Lizon, J.; Curto, G. Lo; Maire, C.; Manescau, A.; Martins, C. J. a. P.; Mégevand, D.; Mehner, A.; Micela, G.; Modigliani, A.; Molaro, P.; Monteiro, M. A.; Monteiro, M. J. P. F. G.; Moschetti, M.; Mueller, E.; Nunes, N. J.; Oggioni, L.; Oliveira, A.; Pallé, E.; Pariani, G.; Pasquini, L.; Poretti, E.; Rasilla, J. L.; Redaelli, E.; Riva, M.; Tschudi, S. Santana; Santin, P.; Santos, P.; Segovia, A.; Sosnowska, D.; Sousa, S.; Spanò, P.; Tenegi, F.; Udry, S.; Zanutta, A.; Zerbi, F. (1 July 2020). "Revisiting Proxima with ESPRESSO". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 639: A77. arXiv: 2005.12114 . Bibcode:2020A&A...639A..77S. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037745. ISSN   0004-6361. S2CID   218869742.
• Meadows, Victoria S.; Arney, Giada N.; Schwieterman, Edward W.; Lustig-Yaeger, Jacob; Lincowski, Andrew P.; Robinson, Tyler; Domagal-Goldman, Shawn D.; Deitrick, Russell; Barnes, Rory K.; Fleming, David P.; Luger, Rodrigo; Driscoll, Peter E.; Quinn, Thomas R.; Crisp, David (1 February 2018). "The Habitability of Proxima Centauri b: Environmental States and Observational Discriminants". Astrobiology. 18 (2): 133–189. arXiv: 1608.08620 . Bibcode:2018AsBio..18..133M. doi:10.1089/ast.2016.1589. ISSN   1531-1074. PMC   5820795 . PMID   29431479.
• Mieli, E.; Valli, A. M. F.; Maccone, C. (August 2023). "Astrobiology: resolution of the statistical Drake equation by Maccone's lognormal method in 50 steps". International Journal of Astrobiology. 22 (4): 428–537. Bibcode:2023IJAsB..22..428M. doi: 10.1017/S1473550423000113 .
• Noack, L.; Kislyakova, K. G.; Johnstone, C. P.; Güdel, M.; Fossati, L. (1 July 2021). "Interior heating and outgassing of Proxima Centauri b: Identifying critical parameters". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 651: A103. Bibcode:2021A&A...651A.103N. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202040176 . ISSN   0004-6361. S2CID   236288357.
• Ojha, Lujendra; Troncone, Bryce; Buffo, Jacob; Journaux, Baptiste; McDonald, George (6 December 2022). "Liquid water on cold exo-Earths via basal melting of ice sheets". Nature Communications. 13 (1): 7521. arXiv: 2212.03702 . Bibcode:2022NatCo..13.7521O. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35187-4. PMC   9726705 . PMID   36473880. S2CID   254276494.
• Quarles, B.; Lissauer, Jack J. (23 February 2018). "Long-term Stability of Tightly Packed Multi-planet Systems in Prograde, Coplanar, Circumstellar Orbits within the α Centauri AB System". The Astronomical Journal. 155 (3): 130. arXiv: 1801.06131 . Bibcode:2018AJ....155..130Q. doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aaa966 . S2CID   119219140.
• Quick, Lynnae C.; Roberge, Aki; Mendoza, Guadalupe Tovar; Quintana, Elisa V.; Youngblood, Allison A. (1 October 2023). "Prospects for Cryovolcanic Activity on Cold Ocean Planets". The Astrophysical Journal. 956 (1): 29. Bibcode:2023ApJ...956...29Q. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace9b6 .
• Ribas, Ignasi; Bolmont, Emeline; Selsis, Franck; Reiners, Ansgar; Leconte, Jérémy; Raymond, Sean N.; Engle, Scott G.; Guinan, Edward F.; Morin, Julien; Turbet, Martin; Forget, François; Anglada-Escudé, Guillem (1 December 2016). "The habitability of Proxima Centauri b. I. Irradiation, rotation and volatile inventory from formation to the present". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 596: A111. arXiv: 1608.06813 . Bibcode:2016A&A...596A.111R. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629576. ISSN   0004-6361. S2CID   119253891.
• Ribas, Ignasi; Gregg, Michael D.; Boyajian, Tabetha S.; Bolmont, Emeline (1 July 2017). "The full spectral radiative properties of Proxima Centauri". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 603: A58. arXiv: 1704.08449 . Bibcode:2017A&A...603A..58R. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730582. ISSN   0004-6361. S2CID   119444699.
• Ritchie, Raymond J.; Larkum, Anthony W. D.; Ribas, Ignasi (April 2018). "Could photosynthesis function on Proxima Centauri b?". International Journal of Astrobiology. 17 (2): 147–176. Bibcode:2018IJAsB..17..147R. doi:10.1017/S1473550417000167. ISSN   1473-5504. S2CID   91096652.
• Rouan, Daniel (2014b). "Effective Temperature". Encyclopedia of Astrobiology. Springer. p. 1. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27833-4_487-2. ISBN   978-3-642-27833-4.
• Schulze-Makuch, Dirk; Irwin, Louis N. (2018). Life in the Universe: Expectations and Constraints. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97658-7. ISBN   978-3-319-97657-0.
• Schwieterman, Edward W.; Reinhard, Christopher T.; Olson, Stephanie L.; Harman, Chester E.; Lyons, Timothy W. (10 June 2019). "A Limited Habitable Zone for Complex Life". The Astrophysical Journal. 878 (1): 19. arXiv: 1902.04720 . Bibcode:2019ApJ...878...19S. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1d52 . S2CID   118948604.
• Schwarz, R; Bazsó, Á; Georgakarakos, N; Loibnegger, B; Maindl, T I; Bancelin, D; Pilat-Lohinger, E; Kislyakova, K G; Dvorak, R; Dobbs-Dixon, I (1 November 2018). "Exocomets in the Proxima Centauri system and their importance for water transport". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 480 (3): 3595–3608. arXiv: 1711.04685 . Bibcode:2018MNRAS.480.3595S. doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2064 .
• Sergeev, Denis E.; Lambert, F. Hugo; Mayne, Nathan J.; Boutle, Ian A.; Manners, James; Kohary, Krisztian (8 May 2020). "Atmospheric Convection Plays a Key Role in the Climate of Tidally Locked Terrestrial Exoplanets: Insights from High-resolution Simulations". The Astrophysical Journal. 894 (2): 84. arXiv: 2004.03007 . Bibcode:2020ApJ...894...84S. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8882 . S2CID   215238822.
• Sheikh, Sofia Z.; Smith, Shane; Price, Danny C.; DeBoer, David; Lacki, Brian C.; Czech, Daniel J.; Croft, Steve; Gajjar, Vishal; Isaacson, Howard; Lebofsky, Matt; MacMahon, David H. E.; Ng, Cherry; Perez, Karen I.; Siemion, Andrew P. V.; Webb, Claire Isabel; Zic, Andrew; Drew, Jamie; Worden, S. Pete (November 2021). "Analysis of the Breakthrough Listen signal of interest blc1 with a technosignature verification framework". Nature Astronomy. 5 (11): 1153–1162. arXiv: 2111.06350 . Bibcode:2021NatAs...5.1153S. doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01508-8. ISSN   2397-3366. S2CID   239906760.
• Shields, Aomawa L.; Carns, Regina C. (25 October 2018). "Hydrohalite Salt-albedo Feedback Could Cool M-dwarf Planets". The Astrophysical Journal. 867 (1): 11. arXiv: 1808.09977 . Bibcode:2018ApJ...867...11S. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadcaa . S2CID   76652437.
• Siegel, Ethan (6 September 2016). "Ten Ways 'Proxima b' Is Different From Earth". Forbes. Retrieved 19 February 2023.
• Siraj, Amir; Loeb, Abraham (30 December 2020). "Risks for Life on Proxima b from Sterilizing Impacts". The Planetary Science Journal. 1 (3): 86. arXiv: 2006.12503 . Bibcode:2020PSJ.....1...86S. doi: 10.3847/psj/abc692 . S2CID   220249615.
• Snellen, I. A. G.; Désert, J.-M.; Waters, L. B. F. M.; Robinson, T.; Meadows, V.; van Dishoeck, E. F.; Brandl, B. R.; Henning, T.; Bouwman, J.; Lahuis, F.; Min, M.; Lovis, C.; Dominik, C.; Van Eylen, V.; Sing, D.; Anglada-Escudé, G.; Birkby, J. L.; Brogi, M. (1 August 2017). "Detecting Proxima b's Atmosphere with JWST Targeting CO 2 at 15 μ m Using a High-pass Spectral Filtering Technique". The Astronomical Journal. 154 (2): 77. arXiv: 1707.08596 . Bibcode:2017AJ....154...77S. doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7fbc . S2CID   119358173.
• Turbet, Martin; Leconte, Jérémy; Selsis, Franck; Bolmont, Emeline; Forget, François; Ribas, Ignasi; Raymond, Sean N.; Anglada-Escudé, Guillem (1 December 2016). "The habitability of Proxima Centauri b. II. Possible climates and observability". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 596: A112. arXiv: 1608.06827 . Bibcode:2016A&A...596A.112T. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629577. ISSN   0004-6361. S2CID   64900708.
• Walterová, Michaela; Běhounková, Marie (27 August 2020). "Thermal and Orbital Evolution of Low-mass Exoplanets". The Astrophysical Journal. 900 (1): 24. arXiv: 2007.12459 . Bibcode:2020ApJ...900...24W. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba8a5 . S2CID   220768603.
• Wandel, Amri (1 August 2017). "How far are extraterrestrial life and intelligence after Kepler?". Acta Astronautica. 137: 498–503. arXiv: 1612.03844 . Bibcode:2017AcAau.137..498W. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.12.008. ISSN   0094-5765. S2CID   119332654.
• Yang, J.; Ji, W. (1 December 2018). "Proxima b, TRAPPIST 1e, and LHS 1140b: Increased Ice Coverages by Sea Ice Dynamics". AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2018: P43G–3826. Bibcode:2018AGUFM.P43G3826Y.
• Zahnle, Kevin J.; Catling, David C. (12 July 2017). "The Cosmic Shoreline: The Evidence that Escape Determines which Planets Have Atmospheres, and what this May Mean for Proxima Centauri B". The Astrophysical Journal. 843 (2): 122. arXiv: 1702.03386 . Bibcode:2017ApJ...843..122Z. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7846 . S2CID   92983008.
• Zuluaga, Jorge I.; Bustamante, Sebastian (1 March 2018). "Magnetic properties of Proxima Centauri b analogues". Planetary and Space Science. 152: 55–67. arXiv: 1609.00707 . Bibcode:2018P&SS..152...55Z. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2018.01.006. ISSN   0032-0633. S2CID   118725821.

Further reading

• Calandrelli E, Escher A (16 December 2016). "The top 15 events that happened in space in 2016". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 16 December 2016.

External links

• A search for Earth-like planets around Proxima Centauri
• The habitability of Proxima Centauri b – Pale Red Dot website for future updates
• "ESOcast 87: Pale Red Dot Results". 24 August 2016 – via YouTube.
• "Interviews with Pale Red Dot scientists". 24 August 2016 – via YouTube.
• "Press Conference at ESO HQ". 24 August 2016 – via YouTube.