Proxima Centauri is the nearest star to Earth after the Sun, located 4.25 light-years away in the southern constellation of Centaurus. This object was discovered in 1915 by Robert Innes. It is a small, low-mass star, too faint to be seen with the naked eye, with an apparent magnitude of 11.13. Its Latin name means the 'nearest [star] of Centaurus'. Proxima Centauri is a member of the Alpha Centauristar system, being identified as component Alpha CentauriC, and is 2.18° to the southwest of the Alpha CentauriAB pair. It is currently 12,950AU (0.2ly) from AB, which it orbits with a period of about 550,000years.
Proxima Centauri is a red dwarf star with a mass about 12.5% of the Sun's mass (M☉), and average density about 33times that of the Sun. Because of Proxima Centauri's proximity to Earth, its angular diameter can be measured directly. Its actual diameter is about one-seventh (14%) the diameter of the Sun. Although it has a very low average luminosity, Proxima Centauri is a flare star that randomly undergoes dramatic increases in brightness because of magnetic activity. The star's magnetic field is created by convection throughout the stellar body, and the resulting flare activity generates a total X-ray emission similar to that produced by the Sun. The internal mixing of its fuel by convection through its core and Proxima's relatively low energy-production rate, mean that it will be a main-sequence star for another four trillion years.
Proxima Centauri has one known exoplanet and two candidate exoplanets: Proxima Centaurib, the candidate Proxima Centaurid and the disputed Proxima Centauric.[nb 3] Proxima Centaurib orbits the star at a distance of roughly 0.05AU (7.5millionkm) with an orbital period of approximately 11.2 Earth days. Its estimated mass is at least 1.07times that of Earth.[16] Proximab orbits within Proxima Centauri's habitable zone—the range where temperatures are right for liquid water to exist on its surface—but, because Proxima Centauri is a red dwarf and a flare star, the planet's habitability is highly uncertain. A candidate super-Earth, Proxima Centauric, roughly 1.5AU (220millionkm) away from Proxima Centauri, orbits it every 1,900d (5.2yr).[17][18] A candidate sub-Earth, Proxima Centaurid, roughly 0.029AU (4.3millionkm) away, orbits it every 5.1 days.[16]
In 2002, optical interferometry with the Very Large Telescope (VLTI) found that the angular diameter of Proxima Centauri is 1.02±0.08mas. Because its distance is known, the actual diameter of Proxima Centauri can be calculated to be about 1/7 that of the Sun, or 1.5 times that of Jupiter. The star's mass, estimated from stellar theory, is 12.2%M☉, or 129 Jupiter masses (MJ).[25] The mass has been calculated directly, although with less precision, from observations of microlensing events to be 0.150+0.062 −0.051M☉.[26]
Lower mass main-sequence stars have higher mean density than higher mass ones,[27] and Proxima Centauri is no exception: it has a mean density of 47.1×103kg/m3 (47.1g/cm3), compared with the Sun's mean density of 1.411×103kg/m3 (1.411g/cm3).[nb 4] The measured surface gravity of Proxima Centauri, given as the base-10 logarithm of the acceleration in units of cgs, is 5.20.[8] This is 162 times the surface gravity on Earth.[nb 5]
A 1998 study of photometric variations indicates that Proxima Centauri completes a full rotation once every 83.5 days.[28] A subsequent time series analysis of chromospheric indicators in 2002 suggests a longer rotation period of 116.6±0.7days.[29] Later observations of the star's magnetic field subsequently revealed that the star rotates with a period of 89.8±4days, consistent with a measurement of 92.1+4.2 −3.5days from radial velocity observations.[12][30]
Structure and fusion
Because of its low mass, the interior of the star is completely convective,[31] causing energy to be transferred to the exterior by the physical movement of plasma rather than through radiative processes. This convection means that the helium ash left over from the thermonuclear fusion of hydrogen does not accumulate at the core but is instead circulated throughout the star. Unlike the Sun, which will only burn through about 10% of its total hydrogen supply before leaving the main sequence, Proxima Centauri will consume nearly all of its fuel before the fusion of hydrogen comes to an end.[32]
Convection is associated with the generation and persistence of a magnetic field. The magnetic energy from this field is released at the surface through stellar flares that briefly (as short as per ten seconds)[33] increase the overall luminosity of the star. On May 6, 2019, a flare event bordering Solar M and X flare class,[34] briefly became the brightest ever detected, with a far ultraviolet emission of 2×1030erg.[33] These flares can grow as large as the star and reach temperatures measured as high as 27million K[35]—hot enough to radiate X-rays.[36] Proxima Centauri's quiescent X-ray luminosity, approximately (4–16)×1026erg/s ((4–16)×1019W), is roughly equal to that of the much larger Sun. The peak X-ray luminosity of the largest flares can reach 1028erg/s (1021W).[35]
Proxima Centauri's chromosphere is active, and its spectrum displays a strong emission line of singly ionized magnesium at a wavelength of 280nm.[37] About 88% of the surface of Proxima Centauri may be active, a percentage that is much higher than that of the Sun even at the peak of the solar cycle. Even during quiescent periods with few or no flares, this activity increases the corona temperature of Proxima Centauri to 3.5million K, compared to the 2million K of the Sun's corona,[38] and its total X-ray emission is comparable to the sun's.[39] Proxima Centauri's overall activity level is considered low compared to other red dwarfs,[39] which is consistent with the star's estimated age of 4.85×109years,[14] since the activity level of a red dwarf is expected to steadily wane over billions of years as its stellar rotation rate decreases.[40] The activity level appears to vary[41] with a period of roughly 442 days, which is shorter than the Sun's solar cycle of 11 years.[42]
Proxima Centauri has a relatively weak stellar wind, no more than 20% of the mass loss rate of the solar wind. Because the star is much smaller than the Sun, the mass loss per unit surface area from Proxima Centauri may be eight times that from the Sun's surface.[43]
Life phases
A red dwarf with the mass of Proxima Centauri will remain on the main sequence for about four trillion years. As the proportion of helium increases because of hydrogen fusion, the star will become smaller and hotter, gradually transforming into a so-called "blue dwarf". Near the end of this period it will become significantly more luminous, reaching 2.5% of the Sun's luminosity (L☉) and warming any orbiting bodies for a period of several billion years. When the hydrogen fuel is exhausted, Proxima Centauri will then evolve into a helium white dwarf (without passing through the red giant phase) and steadily lose any remaining heat energy.[32][44]
The Alpha Centauri system may have formed through a low-mass star being dynamically captured by a more massive binary of 1.5–2M☉ within their embedded star cluster before the cluster dispersed.[45] However, more accurate measurements of the radial velocity are needed to confirm this hypothesis.[46] If Proxima Centauri was bound to the Alpha Centauri system during its formation, the stars are likely to share the same elemental composition. The gravitational influence of Proxima might have disturbed the Alpha Centauri protoplanetary disks. This would have increased the delivery of volatiles such as water to the dry inner regions, so possibly enriching any terrestrial planets in the system with this material.[46]
Alternatively, Proxima Centauri may have been captured at a later date during an encounter, resulting in a highly eccentric orbit that was then stabilized by the galactic tide and additional stellar encounters. Such a scenario may mean that Proxima Centauri's planetary companions have had a much lower chance for orbital disruption by Alpha Centauri.[11] As the members of the Alpha Centauri pair continue to evolve and lose mass, Proxima Centauri is predicted to become unbound from the system in around 3.5billion years from the present. Thereafter, the star will steadily diverge from the pair.[47]
Motion and location
Based on a parallax of 768.0665±0.0499mas, published in 2020 in Gaia Data Release 3, Proxima Centauri is 4.2465 light-years (1.3020pc; 268,550AU) from the Sun.[2] Previously published parallaxes include: 768.5±0.2mas in 2018 by Gaia DR2, 768.13±1.04mas, in 2014 by the Research Consortium On Nearby Stars;[48]772.33±2.42mas, in the original Hipparcos Catalogue, in 1997;[49]771.64±2.60mas in the Hipparcos New Reduction, in 2007;[50] and 768.77±0.37mas using the Hubble Space Telescope'sfine guidance sensors, in 1999.[6] From Earth's vantage point, Proxima Centauri is separated from Alpha Centauri by 2.18 degrees,[51] or four times the angular diameter of the full Moon.[52] Proxima Centauri has a relatively large proper motion—moving 3.85arcseconds per year across the sky.[53] It has a radial velocity towards the Sun of 22.2km/s.[5] From Proxima Centauri, the Sun would appear as a bright 0.4-magnitude star in the constellation Cassiopeia, similar to that of Achernar or Procyon from Earth.[nb 6]
Among the known stars, Proxima Centauri has been the closest star to the Sun for about 32,000years and will be so for about another 25,000years, after which Alpha Centauri A and Alpha Centauri B will alternate approximately every 79.91 years as the closest star to the Sun. In 2001, J. García-Sánchez et al. predicted that Proxima Centauri will make its closest approach to the Sun in approximately 26,700years, coming within 3.11ly (0.95pc).[54] A 2010 study by V. V. Bobylev predicted a closest approach distance of 2.90ly (0.89pc) in about 27,400years,[55] followed by a 2014 study by C. A. L. Bailer-Jones predicting a perihelion approach of 3.07ly (0.94pc) in roughly 26,710years.[56] Proxima Centauri is orbiting through the Milky Way at a distance from the Galactic Centre that varies from 27 to 31kly (8.3 to 9.5kpc), with an orbital eccentricity of 0.07.[57]
Proxima Centauri has been suspected to be a companion of the Alpha Centauri binary star system since its discovery in 1915. For this reason, it is sometimes referred to as Alpha CentauriC. Data from the Hipparcos satellite, combined with ground-based observations, were consistent with the hypothesis that the three stars are a gravitationally bound system. Kervella et al. (2017) used high-precision radial velocity measurements to determine with a high degree of confidence that Proxima and Alpha Centauri are gravitationally bound.[5] Proxima Centauri's orbital period around the Alpha CentauriAB barycenter is 547000+6600 −4000 years with an eccentricity of 0.5±0.08; it approaches Alpha Centauri to 4300+1100 −900AU at periastron and retreats to 13000+300 −100AU at apastron.[5] At present, Proxima Centauri is 12,947±260AU (1.94±0.04trillionkm) from the Alpha CentauriAB barycenter, nearly to the furthest point in its orbit.[5]
Six single stars, two binary star systems, and a triple star share a common motion through space with Proxima Centauri and the Alpha Centauri system. (The co-moving stars include HD 4391, γ2 Normae, and Gliese 676.) The space velocities of these stars are all within 10km/s of Alpha Centauri's peculiar motion. Thus, they may form a moving group of stars, which would indicate a common point of origin, such as in a star cluster.[58]
As of 2022, three planets (one confirmed and two candidates) have been detected in orbit around Proxima Centauri, with one possibly being among the lightest ever detected by radial velocity ("d"), one close to Earth's size within the habitable zone ("b"), and a possible gas dwarf that orbits much further out than the inner two ("c"), although its status remains disputed.
Searches for exoplanets around Proxima Centauri date to the late 1970s. In the 1990s, multiple measurements of Proxima Centauri's radial velocity constrained the maximum mass that a detectable companion could possess.[6][64] The activity level of the star adds noise to the radial velocity measurements, complicating detection of a companion using this method.[65] In 1998, an examination of Proxima Centauri using the Faint Object Spectrograph on board the Hubble Space Telescope appeared to show evidence of a companion orbiting at a distance of about 0.5AU.[66] A subsequent search using the Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 failed to locate any companions.[67]Astrometric measurements at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory appear to rule out a Jupiter-sized planet with an orbital period of 2−12years.[68]
In 2017, a team of astronomers using the Atacama Large Millimeter Array reported detecting a belt of cold dust orbiting Proxima Centauri at a range of 1−4AU from the star. This dust has a temperature of around 40K and has a total estimated mass of 1% of the planet Earth. They tentatively detected two additional features: a cold belt with a temperature of 10K orbiting around 30AU and a compact emission source about 1.2arcseconds from the star. There was a hint at an additional warm dust belt at a distance of 0.4AU from the star.[69] However, upon further analysis, these emissions were determined to be most likely the result of a large flare emitted by the star in March2017. The presence of dust within 4AU radius from the star is not needed to model the observations.[70][71]
Proxima Centaurib, or Alpha CentauriCb, orbits the star at a distance of roughly 0.05AU (7.5millionkm) with an orbital period of approximately 11.2Earth days. Its estimated mass is at least 1.07times that of the Earth.[16] Moreover, the equilibrium temperature of Proxima Centaurib is estimated to be within the range where water could exist as liquid on its surface; thus, placing it within the habitable zone of Proxima Centauri.[59][72][73]
In 2016, in a paper that helped to confirm Proxima Centaurib's existence, a second signal in the range of 60–500days was detected. However, stellar activity and inadequate sampling causes its nature to remain unclear.[59]
Proxima Centauric is a candidate super-Earth or gas dwarf about 7 ME orbiting at roughly 1.5 astronomical units (220,000,000km) every 1,900 days (5.2yr).[81] If Proxima Centaurib were the star's Earth, Proxima Centauric would be equivalent to Neptune. Due to its large distance from Proxima Centauri, it is unlikely to be habitable, with a low equilibrium temperature of around 39K.[82] The planet was first reported by Italian astrophysicist Mario Damasso and his colleagues in April2019.[82][81] Damasso's team had noticed minor movements of Proxima Centauri in the radial velocity data from the ESO's HARPS instrument, indicating a possible additional planet orbiting Proxima Centauri.[82] In 2020, the planet's existence was confirmed by Hubble astrometry data from c.1995.[83] A possible direct imaging counterpart was detected in the infrared with the SPHERE, but the authors admit that they "did not obtain a clear detection." If their candidate source is in fact Proxima Centauric, it is too bright for a planet of its mass and age, implying that the planet may have a ring system with a radius of around 5 RJ.[84] However, Artigau et al. (2022) disputed the radial velocity confirmation of the planet.[30]
In 2019, a team of astronomers revisited the data from ESPRESSO about Proxima Centaurib to refine its mass. While doing so, the team found another radial velocity spike with a periodicity of 5.15days. They estimated that if it were a planetary companion, it would be no less than 0.29Earth masses.[62] Further analysis confirmed the signal's existence leading up to the announcement of the candidate planet in February2022.[16]
Prior to the discovery of Proxima Centaurib, the TV documentary Alien Worlds hypothesized that a life-sustaining planet could exist in orbit around Proxima Centauri or other red dwarfs. Such a planet would lie within the habitable zone of Proxima Centauri, about 0.023–0.054AU (3.4–8.1millionkm) from the star, and would have an orbital period of 3.6–14days.[85] A planet orbiting within this zone may experience tidal locking to the star. If the orbital eccentricity of this hypothetical planet were low, Proxima Centauri would move little in the planet's sky, and most of the surface would experience either day or night perpetually. The presence of an atmosphere could serve to redistribute heat from the star-lit side to the far side of the planet.[86]
Proxima Centauri's flare outbursts could erode the atmosphere of any planet in its habitable zone, but the documentary's scientists thought that this obstacle could be overcome. Gibor Basri of the University of California, Berkeley argued: "No one [has] found any showstoppers to habitability." For example, one concern was that the torrents of charged particles from the star's flares could strip the atmosphere off any nearby planet. If the planet had a strong magnetic field, the field would deflect the particles from the atmosphere; even the slow rotation of a tidally locked planet that spins once for every time it orbits its star would be enough to generate a magnetic field, as long as part of the planet's interior remained molten.[87]
Other scientists, especially proponents of the Rare Earth hypothesis,[88] disagree that red dwarfs can sustain life. Any exoplanet in this star's habitable zone would likely be tidally locked, resulting in a relatively weak planetary magnetic moment, leading to strong atmospheric erosion by coronal mass ejections from Proxima Centauri.[89] In December 2020, a candidate SETI radio signal BLC-1 was announced as potentially coming from the star.[90] The signal was later determined to be human-made radio interference.[91]
Observational history
In 1915, the Scottish astronomer Robert Innes, director of the Union Observatory in Johannesburg, South Africa, discovered a star that had the same proper motion as Alpha Centauri.[92][93][94] He suggested that it be named Proxima Centauri[95] (actually Proxima Centaurus).[96] In 1917, at the Royal Observatory at the Cape of Good Hope, the Dutch astronomer Joan Voûte measured the star's trigonometric parallax at 0.755″±0.028″ and determined that Proxima Centauri was approximately the same distance from the Sun as Alpha Centauri. It was the lowest-luminosity star known at the time.[97] An equally accurate parallax determination of Proxima Centauri was made by American astronomer Harold L. Alden in 1928, who confirmed Innes's view that it is closer, with a parallax of 0.783″±0.005″.[93][95]
A size estimate for Proxima Centauri was obtained by the Canadian astronomer John Stanley Plaskett in 1925 using interferometry. The result was 207,000 miles (333,000 km), or approximately 0.24R☉.[98]
In 1951, American astronomer Harlow Shapley announced that Proxima Centauri is a flare star. Examination of past photographic records showed that the star displayed a measurable increase in magnitude on about 8% of the images, making it the most active flare star then known.[99][100] The proximity of the star allows for detailed observation of its flare activity. In 1980, the Einstein Observatory produced a detailed X-ray energy curve of a stellar flare on Proxima Centauri. Further observations of flare activity were made with the EXOSAT and ROSATsatellites, and the X-ray emissions of smaller, solar-like flares were observed by the Japanese ASCA satellite in 1995.[101] Proxima Centauri has since been the subject of study by most X-ray observatories, including XMM-Newton and Chandra.[35]
Because of Proxima Centauri's southern declination, it can only be viewed south of latitude27°N.[nb 8] Red dwarfs such as Proxima Centauri are too faint to be seen with the naked eye. Even from Alpha Centauri A or B, Proxima would only be seen as a fifth magnitude star.[102][103] It has apparent visual magnitude11, so a telescope with an aperture of at least 8cm (3.1in) is needed to observe it, even under ideal viewing conditions—under clear, dark skies with Proxima Centauri well above the horizon.[104] In 2016, the International Astronomical Union organized a Working Group on Star Names (WGSN) to catalogue and standardize proper names for stars.[105] The WGSN approved the name Proxima Centauri for this star on August 21, 2016, and it is now so included in the List of IAU approved Star Names.[106]
In 2016, a superflare was observed from Proxima Centauri, the strongest flare ever seen. The optical brightness increased by a factor of 68× to approximately magnitude6.8. It is estimated that similar flares occur around five times every year but are of such short duration, just a few minutes, that they have never been observed before.[19] On 2020 April22 and 23, the New Horizons spacecraft took images of two of the nearest stars, Proxima Centauri and Wolf 359. When compared with Earth-based images, a very large parallax effect was easily visible. However, this was only used for illustrative purposes and did not improve on previous distance measurements.[107][108]
Because of the star's proximity to Earth, Proxima Centauri has been proposed as a flyby destination for interstellar travel.[109] If non-nuclear, conventional propulsion technologies are used, the flight of a spacecraft to Proxima Centauri and its planets would probably require thousands of years.[110] For example, Voyager 1, which is now travelling 17km/s (38,000mph)[111] relative to the Sun, would reach Proxima Centauri in 73,775 years, were the spacecraft travelling in the direction of that star and Proxima was standing still. Proxima's actual galactic orbit means a slow-moving probe would have only several tens of thousands of years to catch the star at its closest approach, before it recedes out of reach.[112]
Nuclear pulse propulsion might enable such interstellar travel with a trip timescale of a century, inspiring several studies such as Project Orion, Project Daedalus, and Project Longshot.[112] Project Breakthrough Starshot aims to reach the Alpha Centauri system within the first half of the 21st century, with microprobes travelling at 20% of the speed of light propelled by around 100 gigawatts of Earth-based lasers.[113] The probes would perform a fly-by of Proxima Centauri about 20 years after its launch, or possibly go into orbit after about 140 years if swing-by's around Proxima Centauri or Alpha Centauri are to be employed.[114] Then the probes would take photos and collect data of the planets of the stars, and their atmospheric compositions. It would take 4.25 years for the information collected to be sent back to Earth.[115]
Explanatory notes
↑ From knowing the absolute visual magnitude of Proxima Centauri, , and the absolute visual magnitude of the Sun, , the visual luminosity of Proxima Centauri can therefore be calculated:
↑ If Proxima Centauri was a later capture into the Alpha Centauri star system then its metallicity and age could be quite different to that of Alpha Centauri A and B. Through comparing Proxima Centauri to other similar stars it was estimated that it had a lower metallicity, ranging from less than a third, to about the same, of the Sun's.[10][11]
↑ Extrasolar planet names are designated following the International Astronomical Union's naming conventions in alphabetical order according to their respective dates of discovery, with 'Proxima Centauri a' being the star itself.
↑ The density (ρ) is given by the mass divided by the volume. Relative to the Sun, therefore, the density is:
=
= 0.122 · 0.154−3 · (1.41×103kg/m3)
= 33.4 · (1.41×103kg/m3)
= 4.71×104kg/m3
where is the average solar density. See:
Munsell, Kirk; Smith, Harman; Davis, Phil; Harvey, Samantha (11 June 2008). "Sun: facts & figures". Solar system exploration. NASA. Archived from the original on 2 January 2008. Retrieved 12 July 2008.
Bergman, Marcel W.; Clark, T. Alan; Wilson, William J. F. (2007). Observing projects using Starry Night Enthusiast (8thed.). Macmillan. pp.220–221. ISBN978-1-4292-0074-5.
↑ The standard surface gravity on the Earth is 980.665cm/s2, for a 'log g' value of 2.992. The difference in logarithms is 5.20 − 2.99 = 2.21, yielding a multiplier of 102.21 = 162. For the Earth's gravity, see:
Taylor, Barry N., ed. (2001). The International System of Units (SI)(PDF). United States Department of Commerce: National Institute of Standards and Technology. p.29. Retrieved 8 March 2012.
↑ The coordinates of the Sun would be diametrically opposite Proxima Centauri, at α=02h 29m 42.9487s, δ=+62°40′46.141″. The absolute magnitude Mv of the Sun is 4.83, so at a parallax π of 0.77199 the apparent magnitude m is given by 4.83 − 5(log10(0.77199) + 1) = 0.40. See: Tayler, Roger John (1994). The Stars: Their Structure and Evolution. Cambridge University Press. p.16. ISBN978-0-521-45885-6.
↑ For a star south of the zenith, the angle to the zenith is equal to the Latitude minus the Declination. The star is hidden from sight when the zenith angle is 90° or more, i.e., below the horizon. Thus, for Proxima Centauri:
Alpha Centauri is a triple star system in the southern constellation of Centaurus. It consists of three stars: Rigil Kentaurus, Toliman, and Proxima Centauri. Proxima Centauri is the closest star to the Sun at 4.2465 light-years (1.3020 pc).
Barnard's Star is a small red dwarf star in the constellation of Ophiuchus. At a distance of 5.96 light-years (1.83 pc) from Earth, it is the fourth-nearest-known individual star to the Sun after the three components of the Alpha Centauri system, and is the closest star in the northern celestial hemisphere. Its stellar mass is about 16% of the Sun's, and it has 19% of the Sun's diameter. Despite its proximity, the star has a dim apparent visual magnitude of +9.5 and is invisible to the unaided eye; it is much brighter in the infrared than in visible light.
Wolf 359 is a red dwarf star located in the constellation Leo, near the ecliptic. At a distance of 7.86 light-years from Earth, it has an apparent magnitude of 13.54 and can only be seen with a large telescope. Wolf 359 is one of the nearest stars to the Sun with only the Alpha Centauri system, Barnard's Star, and the brown dwarfs Luhman 16 and WISE 0855−0714 known to be closer. Its proximity to Earth has led to its mention in several works of fiction.
Ross 128 is a red dwarf star in the equatorial zodiac constellation of Virgo, near β Virginis. The apparent magnitude of Ross 128 is 11.13, which is too faint to be seen with the unaided eye. Based upon parallax measurements, the distance of this star from Earth is 11.007 light-years, making it the twelfth closest stellar system to the Solar System. It was first cataloged in 1926 by American astronomer Frank Elmore Ross.
Gliese 65, also known as Luyten 726-8, is a binary star system that is one of Earth's nearest neighbors, at 8.8 light-years from Earth in the constellation Cetus. The two component stars are both flare stars with the variable star designations BL Ceti and UV Ceti.
YZ Ceti is a red dwarf star in the constellation Cetus. Although it is relatively close to the Sun at just 12 light years, this star cannot be seen with the naked eye. It is classified as a flare star that undergoes intermittent fluctuations in luminosity. YZ Ceti is about 13 percent the mass of the Sun and 17% of its radius.
Gliese 1 is a red dwarf in the constellation Sculptor, which is found in the southern celestial hemisphere. It is one of the closest stars to the Sun, at a distance of 14.2 light years. Because of its proximity to the Earth it is a frequent object of study and much is known about its physical properties and composition. However, with an apparent magnitude of about 8.6 it is too faint to be seen with the naked eye.
AD Leonis (Gliese 388) is a red dwarf star. It is located relatively near the Sun, at a distance of 16.2 light-years, in the constellation Leo. AD Leonis is a main sequence star with a spectral classification of M3.5V. It is a flare star that undergoes random increases in luminosity.
HD 176051 is a spectroscopic binary star system approximately 49 light years away from Earth in the constellation Lyra. The pair orbit with a period of 22,423 days and an eccentricity of 0.25. Compared to the Sun, they have a somewhat lower proportion of elements more massive than helium. Their individual masses are estimated at 1.07 and 0.71 solar masses (M☉). The system is moving closer to the Sun with a radial velocity of −47 km/s and will reach perihelion in about 269,000 years when it comes within roughly 17 ly (5.1 pc) of the Sun.
Aldebaran b is a candidate exoplanet orbiting the orange giant star Aldebaran, 65 light-years away. It was initially detected in 1993, but was considered doubtful until 2015, when researchers came to a conclusion that there is likely an exoplanet orbiting Aldebaran, consistent with the original calculations, but also compatible with stellar activity. However, in 2019, new data placed doubts on its existence again.
Proxima Centauri b, also referred to as Alpha Centauri Cb, is an exoplanet orbiting within the habitable zone of the red dwarf star Proxima Centauri, which is the closest star to the Sun and part of the larger triple star system Alpha Centauri. It is about 4.2 light-years from Earth in the constellation Centaurus, making it and Proxima d, along with the currently disputed Proxima c, the closest known exoplanets to the Solar System.
Mikko Tuomi is a Finnish astronomer from the University of Hertfordshire, most known for his contributions to the discovery of a number of exoplanets, among them the Proxima Centauri b which orbits the closest star to the Sun. Mikko Tuomi was the first to find indications of the existence of Proxima Centauri b in archival observation data. Other exoplanets to whose discovery or study Tuomi has contributed include HD 40307, HD 154857 c, Kapteyn c, Gliese 682 c, HD 154857, Gliese 221, Gliese 581 g and the planetary system orbiting Tau Ceti. He has led the development of new data analysis techniques for distinguishing observations caused by natural activity of the star and those caused by planets orbiting them.
Gliese 49 is a star in the northern constellation of Cassiopeia. Visually, it is located 106 arcminutes north of the bright star γ Cassiopeiae. With an apparent visual magnitude of 9.56, it is not observable with the naked eye. It is located, based on the reduction of parallax data of Gaia, 32.1 light-years away from the Solar System. The star is drifting closer to the Sun with a radial velocity of −6 km/s.
Gliese 686 is a star in the constellation of Hercules, with an apparent magnitude +9.577. Although it is close to the Solar System – at 26.6 light-years – it is not the closest known star in its constellation, since Gliese 661 is 20.9 light years away. The closest system to this star is the bright μ Herculis, at 4.5 light years. They are followed by GJ 1230 and Gliese 673, at 7.2 and 7.6 light years respectively.
Proxima Centauri c is a controversial exoplanet candidate whose detection could not be recreated, claimed to be orbiting the red dwarf star Proxima Centauri, which is the closest star to the Sun and part of a triple star system.
Proxima Centauri d is a candidate exoplanet orbiting the red dwarf star Proxima Centauri, the closest star to the Sun and part of the Alpha Centauri triple star system. Together with two other planets in the Proxima Centauri system, it is the closest known exoplanet to the Solar System, located approximately 4.2 light-years away in the constellation of Centaurus. The first signs of the exoplanet emerged as a weak 5.15-day signal in radial velocity data taken from the Very Large Telescope during a 2020 study on Proxima b's mass. This signal was formally proposed to be a candidate exoplanet by Faria et al. in a follow-up paper published in February 2022.
Wolf 1069 is a red dwarf star located 31.2 light-years away from the Solar System in the constellation of Cygnus. The star has 17% the mass and 18% the radius of the Sun, a temperature of 3,158 K, and a slow rotation period of 150–170 days. It hosts one known exoplanet called Wolf 1069 b which could possibly sustain life.
↑ Collins, John M.; Jones, Hugh R. A.; Barnes, John R. (June 2017). "Calculations of periodicity from Hα profiles of Proxima Centauri". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 602. A48. arXiv:1608.07834. Bibcode:2017A&A...602A..48C. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628827. S2CID18949162. See section 4: "the vsini is probably less than 0.1 km/s for Proxima Centauri".
↑ Benedict, G. F.; McArthur, B.; Nelan, E.; Story, D.; Whipple, A. L.; Shelus, P. J.; Jefferys, W. H.; Hemenway, P. D.; Franz, Otto G. (1998). "Photometry of Proxima Centauri and Barnard's Star using Hubble Space Telescope fine guidance sensor 3: a search for periodic variations". The Astronomical Journal. 116 (1): 429–439. arXiv:astro-ph/9806276. Bibcode:1998AJ....116..429B. doi:10.1086/300420. S2CID15880053.
↑ Howard, Ward S.; MacGregor, Meredith A.; Osten, Rachel; Forbrich, Jan; Cranmer, Steven R.; Tristan, Isaiah; Weinberger, Alycia J.; Youngblood, Allison; Barclay, Thomas; Parke Loyd, R. O.; Shkolnik, Evgenya L.; Zic, Andrew; Wilner, David J. (2022), "The Mouse That Squeaked: A Small Flare from Proxima Cen Observed in the Millimeter, Optical, and Soft X-Ray with Chandra and ALMA", The Astrophysical Journal, 938 (2): 103, arXiv:2209.05490, Bibcode:2022ApJ...938..103H, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9134, S2CID252211788
↑ E. F., Guinan; Morgan, N. D. (1996). "Proxima Centauri: rotation, chromospheric activity, and flares". Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 28: 942. Bibcode:1996AAS...188.7105G.
↑ Wood, B. E.; Linsky, J. L.; Muller, H.-R.; Zank, G. P. (2000). "Observational estimates for the mass-loss rates of Alpha Centauri and Proxima Centauri using Hubble Space Telescope Lyman-alpha spectra". Astrophysical Journal. 537 (2): L49–L52. arXiv:astro-ph/0011153. Bibcode:2000ApJ...537..304W. doi:10.1086/309026. S2CID119332314.
↑ Beech, M. (2011). "The Far Distant Future of Alpha Centauri". Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 64: 387–395. Bibcode:2011JBIS...64..387B.
↑ Lurie, John C.; Henry, Todd J.; Jao, Wei-Chun; Quinn, Samuel N.; Winters, Jennifer G.; Ianna, Philip A.; Koerner, David W.; Riedel, Adric R.; Subasavage, John P. (2014). "The Solar neighborhood. XXXIV. A search for planets orbiting nearby M dwarfs using astrometry". The Astronomical Journal. 148 (5): 91. arXiv:1407.4820. Bibcode:2014AJ....148...91L. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/148/5/91. S2CID118492541.
↑ Perryman, M. A. C.; Lindegren, L.; Kovalevsky, J.; Hoeg, E.; Bastian, U.; Bernacca, P. L.; Crézé, M.; Donati, F.; Grenon, M.; Grewing, M.; van Leeuwen, F.; van der Marel, H.; Mignard, F.; Murray, C. A.; Le Poole, R. S.; Schrijver, H.; Turon, C.; Arenou, F.; Froeschlé, M.; Petersen, C. S. (July 1997). "The Hipparcos catalogue". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 323: L49–L52. Bibcode:1997A&A...323L..49P.
↑ Kirkpatrick, J. D.; Davy, J.; Monet, David G.; Reid, I. Neill; Gizis, John E.; Liebert, James; Burgasser, Adam J. (2001). "Brown dwarf companions to G-type stars. I: Gliese 417B and Gliese 584C". The Astronomical Journal. 121 (6): 3235–3253. arXiv:astro-ph/0103218. Bibcode:2001AJ....121.3235K. doi:10.1086/321085. S2CID18515414.
↑ Williams, D. R. (10 February 2006). "Moon Fact Sheet". Lunar & Planetary Science. NASA. Retrieved 12 October 2007.
↑ Allen, C.; Herrera, M. A. (1998). "The galactic orbits of nearby UV Ceti stars". Revista Mexicana de Astronomía y Astrofísica. 34: 37–46. Bibcode:1998RMxAA..34...37A.
↑ Anosova, J.; Orlov, V. V.; Pavlova, N. A. (1994). "Dynamics of nearby multiple stars. The α Centauri system". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 292 (1): 115–118. Bibcode:1994A&A...292..115A.
↑ Endl, M.; Kuerster, M.; Rouesnel, F.; Els, S.; Hatzes, A.P.; Cochran, W.D. (18–21 June 2002). Deming, Drake (ed.). Extrasolar terrestrial planets: Can we detect them already?. Scientific Frontiers in Research on Extrasolar Planets. Washington, DC. pp.75–79. arXiv:astro-ph/0208462. Bibcode:2003ASPC..294...75E.
↑ Khodachenko, Maxim L.; Lammer, Helmut; Grießmeier, Jean-Mathias; Leitner, Martin; Selsis, Franck; Eiroa, Carlos; Hanslmeier, Arnold; Biernat, Helfried K. (2007). "Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) activity of low mass M stars as an important factor for the habitability of terrestrial exoplanets. I. CME impact on expected magnetospheres of earth-like exoplanets in close-in habitable zones". Astrobiology. 7 (1): 167–184. Bibcode:2007AsBio...7..167K. doi:10.1089/ast.2006.0127. PMID17407406.
↑ Innes, R. T. A. (October 1915). "A Faint Star of Large Proper Motion". Circular of the Union Observatory Johannesburg. 30: 235–236. Bibcode:1915CiUO...30..235I. This is the original Proxima Centauri discovery paper.
↑ Innes, R. T. A. (September 1917). "Parallax of the Faint Proper Motion Star Near Alpha of Centaurus. 1900. R.A. 14h22m55s.-0s 6t. Dec-62° 15'2 0'8 t". Circular of the Union Observatory Johannesburg. 40: 331–336. Bibcode:1917CiUO...40..331I.
↑ Sherrod, P. Clay; Koed, Thomas L. (2003). A complete manual of amateur astronomy: tools and techniques for astronomical observations. Courier Dover Publications. ISBN978-0-486-42820-8.
↑ Crawford, I. A. (September 1990). "Interstellar Travel: A Review for Astronomers". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. 31: 377–400. Bibcode:1990QJRAS..31..377C.
James, Andrew (11 March 2008). "Voyage to Alpha Centauri". The Imperial Star – Alpha Centauri. Southern Astronomical Delights. Retrieved 5 August 2008.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.