1927 Lompoc earthquake

Last updated

1927 Lompoc earthquake
Relief map of California.png
Bullseye1.png
Green pog.svg
Los Angeles
UTC  time1927-11-04 13:51:03
ISC  event 909604
USGS-ANSS ComCat
Local dateNovember 4, 1927 (1927-11-04)
Local time05:49 PST
MagnitudeMw 7.0
Depth10.0 km (6.2 mi)
Epicenter 34°40′48″N120°42′18″W / 34.68°N 120.705°W / 34.68; -120.705 [a]
Areas affected Southern California
Max. intensity MMI IX (Violent)
Tsunami2 m (6 ft 7 in)
CasualtiesNone

The 1927 Lompoc earthquake occurred on November 4 at 05:49 PST with an epicenter off the coast of Santa Barbara County in Southern California. [1] The earthquake measured 7.0 on the moment magnitude scale and had a maximum Modified Mercalli intensity of IX (Violent). There is debate among seismologists on whether or not the earthquake was caused by movement on the Hosgri Fault and its mechanism of faulting. The earthquake caused widespread damage in several towns of Santa Barbara County. A 2 m (6 ft 7 in) tsunami damaged railroad infrastructure and was recorded in Hawaii. There were no injuries or deaths from the earthquake.

Contents

Earthquake

The earthquake occurred on November 4 at 05:49 PST, and the United States Geological Survey placed its epicenter off the coast of Santa Barbara county and moment magnitude at 7.3. [1] Due to the sparse instrumental data, the mechanism of the earthquake remains a source of debate among seismologists. In 1930, seismologist Perry Byerly suggested an epicenter location about 80 km (50 mi) west of Point Arguello based on studying the P and S wave signals on seismographs. This calculation places the epicenter along the Santa Lucia Bank Fault System, which also generated two thrust earthquakes in 1969. This thrust fault runs along the continental margin for more than 100 km (62 mi) and exhibit significant seabed offsets. The epicenter has also been relocated by Harold Jeffreys, Keith Bullen, [b] and the International Seismological Centre. [c] [2]

In 1978, William Gawthrop proposed that the earthquake's epicenter was located imemdiately west of Point Sal, [d] along the Hosgri Fault, based on an analysis of P-waves obtained from various observatories. Gawthrop also interpreted tsunami reports and ground deformation after a triangulation survey in the area of greatest shaking during the same period as evidence of rupture along a coast-parallel thrust fault. Reports of a local tsunami also supports the idea of the seabed bring displaced near the coast. The epicenter location near the Hosgri Fault trace suggest this northwest-trending dextral oblique-reverse fault may have produced the earthquake. However, the vertical component in the earthquake is larger than could be accounted for on the Hosgri Fault. [2]

The next year, Thomas Hanks argued against a possible Hosgri Fault rupture, and relocated the epicenter 40 km (25 mi) from Gawthrop's. [e] Hanks reported the analysis of teleseismic waves from the earthquake suggest a rupture on either a dextral strike-slip fault oriented slightly north or sinistral strike-slip fault oriented east–west, while also producing considerable vertical displacement. Another possible mechanism involves thrust faulting along a fault striking approximately northwards. As the Hosgri Fault lies about 10 km (6.2 mi) from the coast between Point Arguello and Point Buchon, the general lack of strong shaking in this region near the fault suggest a source further offshore. Furthermore, Hanks interpreted that the Hosgri Fault was a sinistral strike-slip fault which contradicts the mechanism of the earthquake. [3]

Seismologists Kenji Satake and Paul G. Somerville determined the earthquake's epicenter to be further offshore [f] based on their analysis of the tsunami arrival times, and estimated the moment magnitude (Mw) at 7.0. The tsunami magnitude (Mt) of 7.6 derived by Katsuyuki Abe from tsunami observations in Hawaii was deemed an overvalue. [4]

Impact

Shaking

Along the coast near Surf, the maximum Modified Mercalli intensity was assigned IX (Violent), and may have reached X (Extreme). Intensity VI (Strong) or greater was felt up to distances of 193.1 km (120.0 mi) from the epicenter, [g] or approximately 100,000 km2 (39,000 sq mi). Shaking was felt as far as Yosemite, more than 402.3 km (250.0 mi) away. The southeastern and northernmost point of perceptibility were at Whittier and Morgan Hill. [5]

Tsunami

The tsunami was the largest locally generated along the west coast of the United States. It was recorded along the coast of California and Hawaii. In Surf, the tsunami reached 2 m (6 ft 7 in), while at Port San Luis, the sea receded by 2 m (6 ft 7 in) before rising. In Los Angeles, an unusual but non-destructive high tide was observed one hour after the earthquake. [6] Railroad workers at Surf and Pismo described the tsunami as a "large storm wave" and there was no drawback of the ocean when the first wave approached. A railway worker in Port San Luis said the sea level fluctuated for an hour by 1.5 m (4 ft 11 in); similar observations were made by a lighthouse keeper nearby. [7] Tide gauges in Fort Point and La Jolla recorded the tsunami, [8] where they appeared as amplitudes of 1.9 cm (0.75 in) and 3.8 cm (1.5 in), respectively, at a period of roughly 15 minutes. The tsunami was also recorded in Hawaii's Hilo and Honolulu. [7] It is the only recorded earthquake in California that is known to generate a tsunami detectable in Hawaii. [4]

Damage

The Lompoc Record reported that every home in Lompoc was damaged to some degree. In stores, merchandaise were knocked onto the floor, while in homes, many dishes and porcelain crashed to the ground. A branch of the Trust and Savings Bank sustained damage to its cornice and operations were suspended until 09:00 PST to remove debris on the sidepath. A Bank of Italy branch also sustained cracks and detached plasters. Store windows in several properties cracked or shattered. Shortly after, many residents rushed to the business district to survey the damage. Among them was driver who was injured in a crash while rushing along West Ocean Avenue. [9]

Properties in the areas north and west of Lompoc sustained the worst damage from the earthquake. Multiple towns, such as Arroyo Grande, Los Berros, Guadalupe, Halcyon, Lompoc, Los Alamos, and Nipomo, reported that chimneys were destroyed. At least 10 sand boils were observed at on Roberd's ranch and the ranch house was displaced on its base by 5 cm (2.0 in). One building in White Hills suffered from collapsed walls. The town of Santa Maria and its surrounding reported cracks in old brick walls, detached cornices and damage to chimneys. In Surf, cracks appeared in a concrete highway and a bridge of the Southern Pacific Railroad was displaced near its center. There were also minor landslides in the area. [8] Seismic shaking was reported on the S.S. Socony and Alaska Standard, located 43.5 km (27.0 mi) and 25.7 km (16.0 mi) from Point Arguello, respectively. The captain of the S.S. Floridian reported dead fishes floating several miles from the town at 11:00 PST. [10] The tsunami swept away a section of railroad at Surf, displacing it by many yards, and flooded a railway station. [7]

See also

Notes

References

  1. 1 2 ANSS. "M 6.9 – The 1927 Lompoc, California Earthquake 1927". Comprehensive Catalog. U.S. Geological Survey.
  2. 1 2 Gawthrop, W. (1978). "The 1927 Lompoc, California earthquake". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 68 (6): 1705–1716. doi:10.1785/BSSA0680061705 (inactive February 19, 2025).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of February 2025 (link)
  3. Hanks, Thomas C. (1979). "The Lompoc, California, earthquake (November 4, 1927; M = 7.3) and its aftershocks". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 69 (2): 451–462. Bibcode:1979BuSSA..69..451H. doi:10.1785/BSSA0690020451.
  4. 1 2 Satake, Kenji; Somerville, Paul G. (August 1992). "Location and Size of the 1927 Lompoc, California, Earthquake from Tsunami Data". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 82. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.988.9910 .
  5. McCulloch, D. S.; Greene, H. G.; Heston, K. S.; Rubin, D. M. (1980). "A summary of the geology and geologic hazards in proposed lease sale 53, central California outer continental shelf". Open-File Report (Report). Open-File Report 80-1095. doi:10.3133/ofr801095.
  6. Borrero, Jose Carlos; Dolan, James F.; Synolakis, Costas Emmanuel (2001). "Tsunamis within the Eastern Santa Barbara Channel". Geophysical Research Letters. 28 (4): 643–646. Bibcode:2001GeoRL..28..643B. doi:10.1029/2000GL011980.
  7. 1 2 3 Lander, James F.; Lockridge, Patricia A.; Kozuch, Michael J. (1993). Tsunamis Affecting the West Coast of the United States, 1806-1992. NGDC Key to Geophysical Records Documentation No. 29. National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS (National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service). pp. 64–66.PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  8. 1 2 Stover, C. W.; Coffman, J.L. (1993). Seismicity of the United States, 1568-1989 (revised) (Report). Professional Paper 1527. p. 128. doi:10.3133/pp1527.PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  9. "Big buildings shattered by heavy shock; damage will reach large sum". Lompoc Record. No. 32. November 4, 1927.
  10. "Significant Earthquakes and Faults Lompoc Earthquake". Southern California Earthquake Data Center. n.d. Retrieved September 11, 2024.