| Legal analysis of the conduct of Israel in Gaza pursuant to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide | |
|---|---|
| Presented | 16 September 2025 |
| Location | Geneva, Switzerland, United Nations Human Rights Council's 60th session; Also available online |
| Author | Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory |
| Purpose | Determine whether actions committed by Israel between 7 October 2023 and 31 July 2025 in the Gaza Strip constitute failure to prevent or committing of genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention [1] |
| Part of a series on the |
| Gaza genocide |
|---|
On 16 September 2025, the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory released a report concluding that Israel is failing to prevent and is actively committing genocide against Palestinians. [2] [3] The commission that released the report was set up by the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), though it is independent and does not officially represent the UN. [3] The Commission found Israel guilty of four out of five acts specified in Article 2 of the 1948 Genocide Convention against Palestinians (murder, causing serious bodily or mental harm, deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to destroy the group, and imposing measures to prevent births) and found statements by senior Israeli officials alongside other evidence sufficient to establish genocidal intent. The report called for genocide charges to be added to the ICC arrest warrants for Israeli leaders. [1]
The report's official title is Legal analysis of the conduct of Israel in Gaza pursuant to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. The report, spanning 72 pages long, resulted from a two-year investigation, examining evidence between 7 October 2023 and 31 July 2025 limited to the Gaza Strip. [4] [1] The report was released in the 60th session of the Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland. [1]
Article 2 of the Genocide Convention defines genocide as:
... any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
- (a) Killing members of the group;
- (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
- (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
- (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
- (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
— Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article 2 [5]
The Commission concluded Israel engaged in acts (a), (b), (c), and (d). This established actus reus of genocide. [1]
Because actus reus is established, proof of dolus specialis (the mens rea component of the crime proving there is genocidal intent) establishes legal grounds for genocide charges, because both actus reus and dolus specialis must be established in order for there to be a genocide. [1]
The Commission establish genocidal intent in two ways:
(i) Intent is established through "statements expressing an intent to destroy, in whole or in part, the protected group." [1] [3] [6]
(ii) Intent is "the only reasonable inference that could be drawn based on the pattern of conduct of the Israeli authorities" in "the totality of the evidence." [1] [3] [6]
To substantiate (i), statements cited include:
The Commission claimed that even if the statements made were the only pieces of evidence considered in the genocide case, these statements are alone sufficient to establish that Israel is liable under the convention because direct and public incitement to commit genocide is punishable under Article 3(c) of the Genocide Convention, even in the absence of other actions (such as genocide or complicity in genocide). [1]
Additional cited evidence establishing genocidal intent included other statements by lower Israeli politicians, Amnesty International's report of a photograph of a slogan on an Israeli military watchtower with the words "Destroy Gaza," and the failure of Israeli officials to investigate or punish IDF soldiers who celebrated demolishing Palestinian civilian properties in Gaza. [1]
The Commission categorized evidence into one of the four relevant acts under Article 2 of the Genocide Convention in order to establish actus reus :
The Commission made a number of suggestions to ameliorate the genocide:
In a press release, Brazil referenced the report, saying "human rights violations in Gaza... must be investigated," but did not explicitly affirm support for the Commission's genocide allegation. However, Brazil voiced support for some of the report's recommendations such as a permanent ceasefire and unimpeded humanitarian aid access. [7]
In a UN press release, Israel called the report a "libelous rant," calling for the report's "termination," and making various ad hominem attacks throughout the article against the Commission. [8] In one instance, Israel attacked members of the Commission for resigning after releasing the report, [8] even though the team claimed their resignations had "absolutely nothing to do with any external event or pressure." [9] [10] Israel declined to cooperate with recommendations made to the Israeli government in the report. [11]
Israel's press release included a number of claims that have been implied to be unsubstantiated [8] [11] or misleading, [10] [11] including:
On 16 September 2025, Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs Espen Barth Eide released a statement stating "we take the findings of the report very seriously," pledging to investigate its findings and recommendations and "follow up on them in our further policy development." [17]
The Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (controlled by the Palestinian Authority, not Hamas) released an official statement calling on the international community to act to prevent genocide "without delay" and on states to take "practical and decisive measures to stop the ongoing genocide, provide international protection for the Palestinian people, end all forms of military and political support to Israel... and impose sanctions on it." The ministry suggested "international silence" on the issue "places the international community in a position of complicity." [18]
South Africa urged all states to comply with the report's recommendations. President Cyril Ramaphosa referenced the report's finding of genocide in the general debate of the eightieth session of the United Nations General Assembly. [19] [20]
The UK government said that the determination as to whether Israel's actions constitute genocide was up to a court, though it stated that "Israel's actions are appalling". [3]
The world's leading genocide scholars' association has backed a resolution stating that Israel's actions in Gaza meet the legal definition of the crime.
The largest professional organization of scholars studying genocide said Monday that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.
The paper interviewed seven renowned genocide and Holocaust researchers from six countries - including Israel - all of whom described the Israeli campaign in Gaza as genocidal. Many said their peers in the field share this assessment.
NRC spoke to seven renowned genocide researchers about Gaza. They are not nearly as divided as public opinion: without exception, they qualify the Israeli actions as 'genocidal'. And according to them, almost all their colleagues agree with that.
[Interviewer:] Professor Bartov, can you talk about the genocide scholars across the world who have come to the same conclusion?... [Bartov:] ...over time, many genocide scholars who are — and legal experts, experts in international law, who, like me, have been very cautious about applying this term [genocide], have gradually come to the conclusion that what we're watching is genocide. And that's important, in the sense that there is now, I think, a growing consensus over that view.
[There is a] Growing Consensus on Israel's Atrocities in Gaza... Prominent Israel experts identifying a genocide in Gaza include Omer Bartov, Daniel Blatman, Amos Goldberg, Lee Mordechai, and Raz Segal, with Shmuel Lederman calling it the "consensus" view among genocide researchers.