| Legal analysis of the conduct of Israel in Gaza pursuant to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide | |
|---|---|
| Presented | 16 September 2025 |
| Location | Geneva, Switzerland, United Nations Human Rights Council's 60th session; Also available online |
| Author | Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory |
| Purpose | Determine whether actions committed by Israel between 7 October 2023 and 31 July 2025 in the Gaza Strip constitute failure to prevent or committing of genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention [1] |
| Part of a series on the |
| Gaza genocide |
|---|
On 16 September 2025, the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory released a report concluding that Israel is failing to prevent and is actively committing genocide against Palestinians. [2] [3] The commission that released the report was set up by the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), though it is independent and does not officially represent the UN. [3] The Commission found Israel guilty of four out of five acts specified in Article 2 of the 1948 Genocide Convention against Palestinians (murder, causing serious bodily or mental harm, deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to destroy the group, and imposing measures to prevent births) and found statements by senior Israeli officials alongside other evidence sufficient to establish genocidal intent. The report called for genocide charges to be added to the ICC arrest warrants for Israeli leaders. [1]
The report's official title is Legal analysis of the conduct of Israel in Gaza pursuant to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. The report, spanning 72 pages long, resulted from a two-year investigation, examining evidence between 7 October 2023 and 31 July 2025 limited to the Gaza Strip. [4] [1] The report was released in the 60th session of the Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland. [1]
Article 2 of the Genocide Convention defines genocide as:
... any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
- (a) Killing members of the group;
- (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
- (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
- (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
- (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
— Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article 2 [5]
The Commission concluded Israel engaged in acts (a), (b), (c), and (d). This established actus reus of genocide. [1]
Because actus reus is established, proof of dolus specialis (the mens rea component of the crime proving there is genocidal intent) establishes legal grounds for genocide charges, because both actus reus and dolus specialis must be established in order for there to be a genocide. [1]
The Commission establish genocidal intent in two ways:
(i) Intent is established through "statements expressing an intent to destroy, in whole or in part, the protected group." [1] [3] [6]
(ii) Intent is "the only reasonable inference that could be drawn based on the pattern of conduct of the Israeli authorities" in "the totality of the evidence." [1] [3] [6]
To substantiate (i), statements cited include:
The Commission claimed that even if the statements made were the only pieces of evidence considered in the genocide case, these statements are alone sufficient to establish that Israel is liable under the convention because direct and public incitement to commit genocide is punishable under Article 3(c) of the Genocide Convention, even in the absence of other actions (such as genocide or complicity in genocide). [1]
Additional cited evidence establishing genocidal intent included other statements by lower Israeli politicians, Amnesty International's report of a photograph of a slogan on an Israeli military watchtower with the words "Destroy Gaza," and the failure of Israeli officials to investigate or punish IDF soldiers who celebrated demolishing Palestinian civilian properties in Gaza. [1]
The Commission categorized evidence into one of the four relevant acts under Article 2 of the Genocide Convention in order to establish actus reus :
The Commission made a number of suggestions to ameliorate the genocide:
In a press release, Brazil referenced the report, saying "human rights violations in Gaza... must be investigated," but did not explicitly affirm support for the Commission's genocide allegation. However, Brazil voiced support for some of the report's recommendations such as a permanent ceasefire and unimpeded humanitarian aid access. [7]
Israel did not cooperate with the commission having accused it of pursuing an anti-Israel political agenda and exceeding its mandate. [8] [9] The Israeli ambassador to the UN described the report as a "libelous rant", and President Isaac Herzog said that it "obsesses over blaming the Jewish state, whitewashing Hamas’s atrocities, and turning victims of one of the worst massacres of modern times into the accused". [8] The Israeli foreign ministry called for the abolition of the Commission of Inquiry and accused the reports of authors of being "Hamas proxies". [10] [3] Commission chair Navi Pillay said of the Israeli response: "I wish they would tell us where we went wrong on these facts, or just cooperate with us." [8]
On 16 September 2025, Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs Espen Barth Eide released a statement stating "we take the findings of the report very seriously," pledging to investigate its findings and recommendations and "follow up on them in our further policy development." [11]
The Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (controlled by the Palestinian Authority, not Hamas) released an official statement calling on the international community to act to prevent genocide "without delay" and on states to take "practical and decisive measures to stop the ongoing genocide, provide international protection for the Palestinian people, end all forms of military and political support to Israel... and impose sanctions on it." The ministry suggested "international silence" on the issue "places the international community in a position of complicity." [12]
South Africa urged all states to comply with the report's recommendations. President Cyril Ramaphosa referenced the report's finding of genocide in the general debate of the eightieth session of the United Nations General Assembly. [13] [14]
The UK government said that the determination as to whether Israel's actions constitute genocide was up to a court, though it stated that "Israel's actions are appalling". [3]