In 2025, under President Donald Trump's second presidency, federal government forces, primarily National Guard troops, were deployed to select US cities. Trump has given multiple explanations for the deployments, saying they are officially part of crackdowns on protests, crime, homelessness, and undocumented immigration. The actions targeted Democratic Party-led cities and sparked significant controversy, with critics labeling them as abuses of power and potential violations of laws like the Posse Comitatus Act, which limits military involvement in domestic law enforcement.
Deployments began in Los Angeles in June 2025 and expanded to Washington, D.C. in August 2025, before a presidential authorization was issued to expand to Memphis, Tennessee in September 2025; plans were underway for Chicago, Illinois and potentially other cities like New York, Baltimore, San Francisco, and Oakland. [1] [2] [3] [4] The moves came amidst broader expansions of the military's domestic use during the second Trump administration, [5] and Trump's prior comments during his presidential campaign to use the military to end protests without consent from state governors and target "the enemy within". [6] [7]
On September 2, federal courts ruled that the administration had illegally sent troops into Los Angeles in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act, a development described as potentially complicating Trump's threats for further military deployment. [8]
I have the right to do anything I want to do. I'm the president of the United States. If I think our country is in danger, and it is in danger in these cities, I can do it.
During his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump said he would use the military to end protests without consent from state governors, actions which his aides had talked him out of during his first term. [6] He also stated he would use the military against "the enemy within", [7] which Trump described as "radical left lunatics", Democratic politicians, and those opposed to his candidacy. [10] [11]
Following his election, the Trump administration launched successive purges of top military and intelligence leadership whose views were seen as being at odds with Trump. [12] As early as February 2025, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth fired multiple military lawyers, saying that "we want lawyers who give sound constitutional advice and don't exist to attempt to be roadblocks to anything". [13] Trump expanded the domestic use of the military, which former military officials and experts on civil-military relations described as an attempt to get Americans used to seeing troops in major American cities and allow Trump to more aggressively quell unrest and dissent. [5] In August, Trump signed an executive order directing the National Guard to create specialized military units to quell civil disturbances in American states to be deployed at his command. [14] In September, Pentagon leadership unveiled a draft of the National Defense Strategy which prioritized domestic and regional missions rather than combating Russia and China in a dramatic shift from prior plans. [15]
In June 2025, Trump ordered 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles amid protests against immigration raids, overriding California Governor Gavin Newsom's objections. [16] On September 2, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ruled that the Trump administration had violated the Posse Comitatus Act in its deployment of military forces, and that the rationale for deployment was contrived, writing that "was no rebellion, nor was civilian law enforcement unable to respond to the protests and enforce the law". [17]
The New York Times described the federalization and deployment of the California National Guard as Trump "pushing the boundaries of presidential authority and stoking criticism that he is inflaming the situation for political gain" by portraying the events as an "existential threat to the country", [18] and embracing the rhetoric of a nation under siege with Trump saying he needed to "liberate Los Angeles" from a "migrant invasion". [19] Communications experts described the language as militaristic, hyperbolic, inflammatory, and designed to discourage dissent. [20] [21]
The Economist described the response as only barely concerned with restoring order, [22] and stated its purpose was to "create confrontation" and fuel a "cycle of protest, violence and repression" to the administration's benefit. [23] Politico described Trump's response as motivated by attempting to avoid a repeat of the George Floyd protests when he was advised against deploying the military, as acting in his belief of a governing mandate by voters that fueled his 2024 election victory, and serving as a warning to other city and state leaders. [24] Internal military communications expressed concerns of "far-reaching social, political and operational" impacts of the deployment, and that use of military forces posed "extremely high" risk to civilians, troops, and the military's reputation. [25]
Approximately 2,000 National Guard troops, including about 800 from D.C. were deployed in August 2025. [26] The administration federalized the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department for 30 days and armed the troops for patrols in tourist areas rather than high-crime zones. [27] Trump claimed this had brought "total safety" and a "miracle" reduction in crime, citing a week without murders. [28] [29] Before the military intervention, crime statistics showed D.C. being in a 30-year low in crime, although there was a small spike in lethality in 2023 that since came down. [30] Over 700 arrests and 91 illegal firearms seizures were reported by August 24. [31] A poll conducted showed that nearly 80% of D.C. residents opposed the deployment. [32] Troops were mobilized from Republican-led states which had 10 cities with higher crime rates than D.C. [33]
The Pentagon has been planning a military deployment for weeks ahead of August 2025, potentially mobilizing thousands of National Guard troops as early as September 2025. [34] Trump has repeatedly singled out Chicago as "next," calling it a "mess" and claiming residents are "screaming" for federal intervention. [35] No formal request has been made to Illinois officials, and crime data shows significant declines (homicides down 30%, shootings down 40% in the past year). [36]
On September 6, Trump threatened " Apocalypse Now "-style action against Chicago, writing "I love the smell of deportations in the morning" amid an AI-generated picture of himself as Lt. Col. Bill Kilgore in front of a burning Chicago skyline with helicopters and that "Chicago [is] about to find out why it's called the Department of WAR". The post was criticized by local elected leaders, with Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker writing, "The President of the United States is threatening to go to war with an American city. This is not a joke. This is not normal." Trump's threat came amidst large city-wide celebrations and parades. [37]
On September 12, 2025, Trump announced the deployment of National Guardsmen to Memphis, Tennessee, saying that "Memphis is deeply troubled" and that he would have preferred deploying the troops to Chicago. He did not specify when the troops would be deployed to the city. [38] As of 2025 [update] , FBI statistics indicate that Memphis has among the highest rates of violent crimes among US cities. Trump did not indicate under what authority the troops would be deployed in Memphis. [39]
On September 15, 2025, Trump signed a presidential memorandum ordering the deployment of federal law enforcement as part of a task force with Tennessee's National Guard. [40] Members of the Memphis municipal government, including Memphis mayor Paul Young and Memphis city council members, spoke against the planned deployment. [41] [42] The Shelby County Board of Commissioners voted on a pair of resolutions to either support a ninety day deployment or call on Tennessee Governor Bill Lee to oppose the deployment. [43] Both resolutions were rejected by the Shelby County Board of Commissioners. [44] Shelby County mayor Lee Harris was less willing to compromise than Young in his opposition to the planned deployment of federal forces to Memphis. [45]
President Trump has mentioned expanding to New York City, New Orleans, Louisiana, Baltimore, Maryland, and Oakland, California, after Chicago. [46] [47] [48] Up to 1,700 National Guard troops are mobilizing across 19 states (e.g., Texas with the most) to support ICE on immigration enforcement, though the White House claims this is separate from the crime crackdown. [49] [50] These could serve as a "reaction force" for rapid deployments. [51]
Local leaders denounced the moves. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson warns it could "inflame tensions" and undermine trust in law enforcement. [52] Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker calls it an "authoritarian power grab" with no emergency justification. [53] House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries accuses Trump of manufacturing a crisis. [54] D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser and others highlight pre-existing crime drops and argue troops lack proper training for policing. [55]
Deployments in D.C. leverage unique federal control over the capital, but expansions elsewhere may require invoking the Insurrection Act or declaring emergencies to federalize state National Guards, potentially bypassing governors. [56] Critics argue these are politically motivated, targeting Democratic cities for "theater and intimidation." [57]
On September 2, 2025, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ruled that the Trump administration had violated the Posse Comitatus Act and ordered the administration not to use National Guard or military troops for civilian law enforcement in California with that prohibition to take effect on September 12. Breyer described the administration's actions and rhetoric of further domestic military deployments as an apparent attempt at "creating a national police force with the President as its chief" and described the rationale for deployment as contrived, writing that "There was no rebellion, nor was civilian law enforcement unable to respond to the protests and enforce the law". [17] [58] He said the Trump administration, if it wished to argue, would have to "satisfy the requirements of a valid constitutional or statutory exception, as defined herein, to the Posse Comitatus Act." [59]
They have shared images and videos of the most violent episodes — focusing particularly on examples of protesters lashing out at federal agents — even as many remained peaceful.
This is more than typical Trumpian hyperbole. There's a long tradition of autocratic-style leaders creating or exaggerating public-order incidents to justify the use of the military.
Now, a visual communications strategy meant to encourage immigrants without legal status to leave the United States has melded into a militarized pressure campaign that also appears devised to discourage dissent, experts said.
the cycle of protest, violence and repression often benefits the political right, even when the unrest is fanned by the government itself. In Los Angeles neither the local police department, nor the mayor or the governor thought the presence of the National Guard would help restore order. But to point that out is to misunderstand why Mr Trump ordered troops in. That was to create confrontation.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)