Golden Dome (missile defense system)

Last updated

Golden Dome
Golden Dome constellation.webp
Visualization of a global constellation of space-based interceptors such as that proposed by Golden Dome
Type Missile defense
Place of origin United States
Production history
Unit cost<$831 billion (CBO estimate)
$175 billion (White House estimate)
Produced2029– (White House estimate)
2035– (CSIS estimate) [1]
Specifications
Operational
range
Global
Launch
platform
Satellites, ground-based

The Golden Dome is a proposed multi-layer missile defense system for the United States, intended to detect and destroy ballistic, hypersonic, and cruise missiles before they launch or during their flight. The system would employ a constellation of satellites equipped with sensors and space-based interceptors. [2] The architecture has been viewed as similar to the Brilliant Pebbles concept of the 1980s. [3] [4] If implemented, the U.S. would maintain space weapons in orbit for the first time. [2]

Contents

The system would rely on thousands of space-based weapons or "interceptors" distributed around the entire Earth. [5] Interceptors are kept staged near the edge of the atmosphere, where they must maintain rapid orbits to avoid falling back to Earth. Their rapid motion allows only a small fraction to be available at the right time and place to act on any given threat, a flaw that critics argue makes the concept less efficient than traditional regional missile defenses such as Iron Dome. [6] [7] However, the program's stated scope extends beyond defensive interception. In 2019, Donald Trump emphasized the system's offensive potential, stating the weapons would be "a very, very big part of our defense and, obviously, of our offense." He contrasted this capability with foreign adversaries, remarking, "We have some very bad players out there... but we can be far worse than anybody, if need be." [8] [9]

On January 27, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing the United States Armed Forces to construct the Iron Dome for America before the end of his term; it was later renamed the Golden Dome in May 2025. [10] Although the order and the name allude to Israel's short-range Iron Dome system, [11] observers note that the Golden Dome would encompass the entire Earth, more like the Strategic Defense Initiative proposed by then-President Ronald Reagan in 1983. [12] [13] [14] [15]

Cost estimates for the Golden Dome program range from $175 billion (White House), to $831 billion (Congressional Budget Office), to $3.6 trillion (American Enterprise Institute) depending on the architectural details. The wide range largely hinges on the number of space-based missiles and their continuous replenishment costs. Continuous replacement costs are increased by the use of low orbits which lead to early orbital decay due to atmospheric drag. [16] [17] [18] $24.4 billion in federal funding was directed to Golden Dome in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in 2025, with another $13 billion allocated for FY2026, totaling 2.2% of the entire federal discretionary budget during that year. [19] [20]

As of December 2025, the U.S. government has not publicly announced any contract awards for Golden Dome, though the Wall Street Journal has reported that SpaceX is "set to receive" a $2 billion contract to build a 600-satellite constellation for missile targeting. [21] [22] This came after Elon Musk's earlier denials of involvement, saying he was focused on Mars. [23] Much smaller contracts for space-based interceptors were reportedly awarded "in secret" in late November. [24] Awardees include Anduril Industries, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and True Anomaly. [25] In December, over 1,000 "qualifying offerors" were deemed eligible for potential future awards. [26] [27]

History

Influenced by strategic analyses such as the 1976 Team B report—which argued U.S. intelligence had vastly underestimated Soviet threats—and ideas of the Citizens' Advisory Council on National Space Policy, President Ronald Reagan announced the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) in 1983. [28] It proposed a space-based global missile defense constellation intended to render nuclear weapons "impotent and obsolete." The program immediately faced challenges, with concerns by Congress, including prominent Senators Sam Nunn and Joe Biden, over its apparent violation of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, questionable technical feasibility, spiraling launch costs, poor cost-exchange ratio, and destabilizing impact on arms control. By the 1990s, SDI was formally restructured into the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization, pivoting from space-based platforms to more proven ground- and sea-based systems. [29]

U.S. missile defense policy continued to evolve, with the 1999 National Missile Defense Act mandating a system to defend against limited ballistic missile attacks. Following a later Team B report's recommendation, [30] [31] President George W. Bush withdrew the U.S. from the ABM Treaty in 2001. [32] The Obama administration's 2010 Review shifted focus from a homeland-centered shield to more flexible and cooperative regional defenses, limiting the space component to sensing and tracking. [33] This was adjusted by the Trump administration's 2019 Review, expanding scope from rogue states such as North Korea, to include advanced hypersonic threats from "competitors" like Russia and China. [34] [35] By contrast, the Biden administration's 2022 Review, while prioritizing Ground-based Midcourse Defense, emphasized that it is "neither intended nor capable of defeating" peer-level threats from Russia or China, noting "the interrelationship between strategic offensive arms and strategic defensive systems." [36]

While terrestrial defenses developed, the vision of a full space-based shield remained a consistent goal for its proponents. The modern groundwork for Golden Dome was laid in 2017 by the SDI's former Deputy of Technology, and prominent Team B leader, [31] Michael D. Griffin, who formed the Space Development Agency during the first Trump administration. [37] Griffin long advocated for reusable launch vehicles to make the mass launching of weapons into space economically feasible. While the original Strategic Defense Initiative's attempts at this were short-lived, with the DC-X failing after a series of test flights, Griffin later encouraged and promoted funding of commercial reusable launch vehicles, which have since proven successful. [38] [39]

The Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 effort advocated for a Golden Dome-like effort, writing that SpaceX's development of Starlink proves the feasibility of a space-based "overlayer" of thousands of networked satellites and interceptors. [40] During his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump repeatedly mentioned the missile shield concept, often to mixed reception. [41]

In May 2025, four months after the beginning of Trump's second presidency, 42 members of US Congress formally asked the DoD Inspector General to review Elon Musk’s involvement in Golden Dome. [42] They cited concerns over deviations from standard acquisition processes and a dome subscription model that could "give Musk undue influence over national security." Another key conflict of interest involves four-star general Terrence J. O'Shaughnessy, former head of U.S. homeland missile defense, who now reports directly to Musk at SpaceX. [43] Michael D. Griffin, founder of the Space Development Agency behind Golden Dome, has also faced scrutiny. [44] After traveling to Russia with a young Musk in 2001 to study ICBMs, Griffin steered $2 billion in NASA contracts to Musk's newfound space company. [39] SpaceX has since secured missile-tracking satellite contracts through Griffin's SDA as part of its Starshield program. Griffin also serves as an advisor to Castelion, a startup founded by former SpaceX executives that seeks to mass-produce hypersonic weapons. [45] [46]

In April 2025 the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) determined that Golden Dome fell under its oversight, as they are required by law to analyze testing plans for defense programs with procurements above $3 billion. Days later, Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) investigated the office and slashed its resources. A defense official told CNN that they believed DOGE wanted to prevent DOT&E conducting independent oversight of Golden Dome. [47]

Announcement

President Trump announcing the Golden Dome program in the Oval Office with the Secretary of Defense

On May 20, 2025, U.S. president Donald Trump announced plans for a new space-based missile defense system called the "Golden Dome." Intended to shield the United States from long-range and hypersonic missile threats, the system draws inspiration from Israel's Iron Dome but is orders of magnitude broader in scope. [48] [49]

Trump said the project would be completed within three years and cost about $175 billion, [50] a timeline and price estimate that were quickly and widely disputed. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that it could cost between $161 billion and $542 billion over 20 years, [49] [51] while Republican Senators involved in the program predicted the end cost would be "trillions of dollars." [52] Republicans included a down payment of $25 billion for Golden Dome their 2025 reconciliation spending bill. [53]

General Michael A. Guetlein of the U.S. Space Force was nominated to serve as Golden Dome's direct reporting program manager in June 2025 [54] and was confirmed by the Senate the following month. [55] He assumed the position on July 21, 2025. [56]

Defense contractors, including SpaceX, Palantir, Anduril and Lockheed Martin are reportedly vying for involvement, while experts have expressed doubts over the timeline, feasibility, and cost. [57] [58] Specific technical details and deployment plans have not yet been released. [59] [60]

Architecture and doctrine

The Golden Dome pivots U.S. missile defense from a posture of measured protection against "rogue states" to what President Trump has advertised as a "very close to 100 percent effective" shield, designed to defeat peer-level countries through boost-phase intercept. [10] [61] Unlike existing ground-based systems that target warheads in mid-course, Golden Dome prioritizes the neutralization of ballistic missiles during their more vulnerable boost or ascent phase—while the booster engines are still burning over their launch country and are usually visible to space-based infrared sensors. This capability is derived from a proliferation of satellites and space-based interceptors, which are distributed in low Earth orbit such that at least one kinetic kill vehicle is likely within range of any launch site. [62] The architecture is enabled by the Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensor layer, which provides the "fire-control quality" tracks necessary to guide these interceptors against targets. [63] [64] [65] This "left of launch" and boost-phase focus represents a fundamental shift in deterrence strategy, aiming to render adversary nuclear arsenals obsolete by destroying them over their own territory rather than intercepting them over the United States. [66]

The Dome further establishes a doctrinal and technical architecture for a space-based global strike capability. The administration's "peace through strength" platform, prioritizes offensive overmatch. [9] Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth framed this dual-use mandate, as ensuring that "[the United States] will be able to strike anywhere, anytime." This offensive mandate is enabled by the Space Development Agency's (SDA) Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture (PWSA), whose architect, Michael D. Griffin, enforced a requirement for "fire-control quality" data across the network—a precision standard specifically designed to guide kinetic kill vehicles to their targets rather than merely tracking them. [63] Future heavy-lift capacity of the SpaceX Starship launch vehicle allows the architecture to bypass historical mass-to-orbit constraints, enabling the proliferation of heavy, offensive payloads that were previously economically unviable. [18] The offensive component of this architecture appears to rely on a mix of hypersonic systems. The Common-Hypersonic Glide Body (C-HGB) provides a "bunker-buster" strategic capability. Unlike fragile kinetic interceptors that disintegrate upon re-entry, the C-HGB utilizes a carbon-carbon thermal protection system originally validated by the Sandia SWERVE testbed, rendering it inherently capable of surviving orbital decay to strike terrestrial targets with kinetic precision. [67] [68] Dubbed the "Super Duper Missile" by Trump, and part of the Dark Eagle program, the C-HGB is reportedly capable of traveling 1,000 miles from its deployment point to hit a target within 14 inches. [69] Castelion, founded by former SpaceX Starshield executives and advised by Griffin, has developed the Blackbeard munition with a specific HIMARS-compatible form factor. This design choice allows the weapon to be racked in high density within standard satellite payload bays, effectively creating an orbital magazine for responsive tactical strikes. [70] [71] [72]

The executive order called for several design objectives for the dome to include plans for at least eight components: [70]

Assessment

2025 Defense Intelligence Agency assessment of current and future missile threats to the U.S. Golden Dome for America Current and Future Missile Threats to the U.S. Homeland.jpg
2025 Defense Intelligence Agency assessment of current and future missile threats to the U.S.

Marion Messmer, a senior research fellow at London-based Chatham House, said that the Golden Dome's challenges were much greater than the ones that Israel's Iron Dome had to face as it had a much larger territory [73] to cover and more types of missiles it had to defeat. Shashank Joshi, defense editor at The Economist , said while the US military would take the plan very seriously, it was unrealistic to think the system would be completed during Trump's term, and that its cost would take up a large part of the defense budget. [74] Patrycja Bazylczyk, a missile defense expert at the CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies), said that the Golden Dome signaled a reorientation of US missile defense policy towards countering Russia and China, versus existing systems geared towards North Korea. [75] The Arms Control Association has noted that the Putin regime has been working to ensure it can overcome the threat of a future U.S. space-based interceptor network by developing anti-satellite weapons, undersea torpedoes, hypersonic glide vehicles, and nuclear-powered cruise missiles. Beijing, meanwhile, may respond by increasing its nuclear-armed ballistic missile force. [76] Before the announcement, China's military nuclear arsenal stood at about ⁠1/6⁠ the size of the United States. Analysts warn that Golden Dome's pursuit of total immunity could undermine strategic stability, transforming the modern focus on maintaining reliable retaliation into a race to develop new and unpredictable first-strike options. [62]

A study by Todd Harrison of the American Enterprise Institute estimated that the cost of developing and operating the Golden Dome until 2045 could range from $252 billion to $3.6 trillion, depending on how expansive the system is. [77] Advocates of Golden Dome describe a national missile defense shield as "a strategic imperative." [78] In November 2025, United States Strategic Command nominee Richard Correll testified that Golden Dome was key to ensure U.S. nuclear second strike capability. [79] Critics suggest the costs for these capabilities have been underestimated, creating a "multi-trillion-dollar gap between rhetoric and reality." [17]

Article I of the Outer Space Treaty states that space is "the province of all mankind" and forbids placing weapons of mass destruction in orbit. Some permanent members of the United Nations Security Council have expressed objections to the Golden Dome program, citing inconsistencies with this principle. The program's use of space for attacking targets on the ground ("left of launch" preemptive strike capabilities) [71] has led to discussion over the legality under international law. [80] [71] [81] [82] [83] [84]

Some analysts argue the integration of such offensive payloads into Low Earth Orbit (LEO) introduces a severe economic and strategic instability driven by the harsh environmental constraints of the domain. LEO satellites function as "perishable munitions" due to rapid orbital decay, creating a “sunk cost trap” for high-value assets like the C-HGB, which has a procurement cost of approximately $41 million per unit according to the Congressional Budget Office. [67] Unlike terrestrial silos that maintain value for decades, the imminent expiration of orbital weapons creates a fiscal “use it or lose it" pressure, potentially incentivizing commanders to expend these assets in gray zone conflicts rather than allowing billions of dollars of hardware to burn up in the atmosphere. Ultimately, the deployment of such systems creates a state of "orbital ambiguity" that destabilizes traditional deterrence. Because a Starshield satellite carrying defensive interceptors is indistinguishable on radar from a commercial Starlink satellite or one carrying offensive hypersonic gliders, adversaries are forced to treat the entire constellation as a potential nuclear-equivalent first-strike platform. Strategic theorists such as Forrest Morgan (RAND) and James Acton (Carnegie Endowment) argue that this "warhead ambiguity" creates a “reciprocal fear of surprise attack," incentivizing adversaries to execute massive "blinding" strikes against the constellation or its launch infrastructure at the onset of any crisis, thereby ensuring that a limited conflict immediately escalates to the strategic level. [85] [86] [87]

Strategic value of Greenland

On January 14, 2026, President Trump claimed it was vital that the United States take control of Greenland to be able to construct the Golden Dome. [88] In early 2025, the Government Accountability Office warned that the constellation of satellites being built for Golden Dome, including SDA's PWSA and SpaceX Starshield satellites, have not been able to demonstrate reliable links between satellites in different orbital planes due to high relative motion. [89] Defense analysts note that Pituffik Space Base serves as a critical ground station bridge, being one of the few defensible places on Earth that can directly communicate with all planes in the constellation. While the U.S. already operates from Pituffik with Denmark’s consent, some analysts argue sovereignty would eliminate political constraints and ensure uninterrupted control over assets critical to Golden Dome. [90] [91]

Pituffik is uniquely suited for these optical (laser) downlinks because it sits in a polar desert, offering exceptionally low precipitable water vapor. This creates an atmospheric window for reliable V-band and laser transmission, which are otherwise attenuated by moisture in temperate zones—thereby enabling the massive data backhaul required to "close the kill chain" for Golden Dome's hypersonic interceptors. [92] A 2025 USNORTHCOM modernization study consequently prioritized a new Network Operations Center at Pituffik to handle this throughput. [93] [94] Complicating U.S. dominance, the European Space Agency (ESA) began construction of its own optical ground station in Greenland in late 2025, creating a rival infrastructure capable of terabyte-speed data transfer that bypasses U.S. networks. [92] Finally, the site is logistically essential for the Golden Dome's low-orbit interceptors that suffer high atmospheric drag and require continuous replenishment. [95] Some strategic analyses speculate that Arctic basing could, in theory, support higher-latitude launch and tracking operations, though no such launch infrastructure currently exists in Greenland. [96]

International reactions

See also

Other nations

References

  1. ↑ Mike Stone, Jeff Mason (May 21, 2025). "Trump selects $175 billion Golden Dome defense shield design, appoints leader". Reuters. Retrieved May 24, 2025.
  2. 1 2 Baldwin, Sarah Lynch (May 21, 2025). "What is the "Golden Dome for America"? Here's what to know about Trump's missile defense plan". CBS News. Retrieved May 29, 2025.
  3. ↑ Vergano, Dan (February 19, 2025). "Trump's 'Iron Dome' Space Weapons Plan Ignores Physics and Fiscal Reality". Scientific American . Retrieved May 23, 2025.
  4. ↑ "Donald Trump revives ideas of a Star Wars-like missile shield" . The Economist . January 30, 2025. Retrieved May 24, 2025.
  5. ↑ Billings, Lee (May 22, 2025). "Trump's 'Golden Dome' Probably Can't Work, According to Science". Scientific American. Retrieved May 23, 2025.
  6. ↑ Roberts, Thomas G. (June 28, 2018). "Why a space-based missile interceptor system is not viable". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved May 23, 2025.
  7. ↑ "Space-based Missile Defense". Union of Concerned Scientists. August 30, 2018. Retrieved May 23, 2025.
  8. ↑ "Decades after Reagan's 'Star Wars,' Trump calls for missile defenses that would blast warheads from the sky". www.science.org. Retrieved May 23, 2025.
  9. 1 2 3 "Remarks on United States Missile Defense Policy at the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia". The American Presidency Project. January 17, 2019. Retrieved June 4, 2025.
  10. 1 2 Montague, Zach (January 27, 2025). "President Trump signed four executive orders on Monday focused on the military, according to reporters traveling with him". The New York Times . Retrieved January 27, 2025.
  11. ↑ "The Iron Dome for America". The White House. January 28, 2025. Retrieved May 23, 2025.
  12. ↑ Liebermann, Oren; Cohen, Zachary (March 22, 2025). "'How are you going to do that?' Pentagon scrambles to make Trump's 'Golden Dome' missile defense system a reality". CNN. Retrieved March 23, 2025.
  13. ↑ Brumfiel, Geoff (April 22, 2025). "Trump wants a Golden Dome over America. Here's what it would take". NPR . Retrieved May 6, 2025.
  14. ↑ "An Iron Dome for America?". Brookings. Retrieved November 12, 2025.
  15. ↑ Cirincione, Joe (July 29, 2024). "Can Donald Trump really build an Iron Dome over America?". Defense One. Retrieved November 12, 2025.
  16. ↑ Skibba, Ramin (September 9, 2025). "What's the Plan for 'Golden Dome'? Even Experts Aren't Sure". Scientific American. Retrieved September 19, 2025.
  17. 1 2 Harrison, Todd (September 19, 2025). "Build Your Own Golden Dome: A Framework for Understanding Costs, Choices, and Tradeoffs" (PDF). American Enterprise Institute . Retrieved September 19, 2025.
  18. 1 2 "Costs of Implementing Recommendations of the 2019 Missile Defense Review". Congressional Budget Office. January 2021. Retrieved January 19, 2026.
  19. ↑ "Golden Dome: Funding in the 2025 Reconciliation Law (H.R. 1; P.L. 119-21)". Congressional Research Service. July 10, 2025.
  20. ↑ "Defense Appropriations Bill, 2026: Bill Summary" (PDF). House Committee on Appropriations. June 10, 2025. Retrieved January 22, 2026.
  21. ↑ Chen, Jackson (November 1, 2025). "Pentagon will reportedly award SpaceX a $2 billion contract to help develop the 'Golden Dome'". Yahoo News. Retrieved November 16, 2025.
  22. ↑ Maidenberg, Drew FitzGerald and Micah (October 31, 2025). "Exclusive | Elon Musk's SpaceX Set to Win $2 Billion Pentagon Satellite Deal". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved November 18, 2025.
  23. ↑ Jha, Anuja (April 18, 2025). "Is SpaceX bidding for Trump's Golden Dome missile shield? What Elon Musk said". India Today. Retrieved November 16, 2025.
  24. ↑ Baio, Ariana (November 25, 2025). "Space Force awards secret contracts for Trump's Golden Dome". The Independent. Retrieved December 3, 2025.
  25. ↑ Stone, Mike (November 25, 2025). "Pentagon advances Golden Dome missile defense with new Space Force contracts". Reuters. Retrieved December 3, 2025.
  26. ↑ Roque, Ashley (December 2, 2025). "MDA picks over 1,000 initial winners for Golden Dome contracting vehicle". Breaking Defense. Retrieved December 3, 2025.
  27. ↑ "SHIELD Awardees (2 Dec 25) : SAM.gov". Internet Archive. December 2, 2025. Retrieved December 2, 2025.
  28. ↑ Federation of American Scientists. "Missile Defense Milestones". Archived from the original on March 6, 2016. Retrieved March 10, 2007.
  29. ↑ Boffey, Philip M. (March 8, 1985). "'Star Wars' And Mankind: Unforeseeable Directions". The New York Times. Retrieved September 21, 2025.
  30. ↑ Michael Douglas Griffin, Team B (March 15, 1996). "Defending America: Ending America's Vulnerability to Ballistic Missiles" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on January 25, 2022.
  31. 1 2 "MDA - 2014 Ronald Reagan Award Winner". www.mda.mil. Archived from the original on February 20, 2025. Retrieved June 11, 2025.
  32. ↑ "NSPD-23: National Policy on Ballistic Missile Defense".
  33. ↑ "Ballistic Missile Defense Review Report". Defense Technical Information Center. 2010.
  34. ↑ "2019 Missile Defense Review" (PDF). US DoD.
  35. ↑ Karako, Tom (January 17, 2019). "The 2019 Missile Defense Review: A Good Start". Center for Strategic and International Studies . Retrieved September 23, 2025.
  36. ↑ "2022 National Defense Strategy, Nuclear Posture Review, and Missile Defense Review" (PDF). U.S. Department of Defense. October 27, 2022. Retrieved September 21, 2025.
  37. ↑ Erwin, Sandra (April 21, 2019). "Space Development Agency a huge win for Griffin in his war against the status quo". SpaceNews . Retrieved May 23, 2025.
  38. ↑ Foust, Jeff (August 19, 2013). "Can lightning strike twice for RLVs?". The Space Review . Retrieved May 23, 2025.
  39. 1 2 Bennett, Jay (November 12, 2020). "How SpaceX became NASA's go-to ride into orbit". National Geographic . Retrieved May 23, 2025.
  40. ↑ Obering III, Henry; Peters, Robert (March 11, 2024). "Time for a New Missile Defense Review and a Space-Based Missile Defense Overlayer". The Heritage Foundation . Archived from the original on June 15, 2024. Retrieved May 23, 2025.
  41. ↑ Hains, Tim (October 24, 2024). "Donald Trump: We Will Build A Missile Defense Shield And Land An American On Mars -- "Get Going, Elon"". RealClearPolitics . Retrieved May 23, 2025.
  42. ↑ "Letter from Congress to the Office of Inspector General" (PDF). Retrieved May 26, 2025.
  43. ↑ FitzGerald, Micah Maidenberg and Drew (February 20, 2024). "Musk's SpaceX Forges Tighter Links With U.S. Spy and Military Agencies". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved May 26, 2025.
  44. ↑ "The Pentagon Is Recruiting Elon Musk To Help Them Win a Nuclear War". Your home for independent journalism. February 11, 2025. Retrieved May 26, 2025.
  45. ↑ Erwin, Sandra (January 29, 2025). "SpaceX veterans' hypersonic weapons startup secures $100 million". SpaceNews. Retrieved May 26, 2025.
  46. ↑ "Team". castelion.cc. Retrieved January 16, 2026.
  47. ↑ Bertrand, Natasha (May 30, 2025). "Hegseth gutted Pentagon office that said it would oversee testing of Golden Dome missile defense system". CNN . Retrieved June 1, 2025.
  48. ↑ "Trump's 'Golden Dome' missile defense plan was inspired by Israel's multitiered defenses". AP News . May 21, 2025. Retrieved May 21, 2025.
  49. 1 2 Yousif, Nadine (May 21, 2025). "Canada in talks with US to join Trump's Golden Dome defence system". BBC News . Retrieved May 21, 2025.
  50. ↑ "America's 'Golden Dome' Explained". CSIS. June 4, 2025.
  51. ↑ Tingley, Brett (May 21, 2025). "U.S. Space Force general selected to lead Trump's $175 billion Golden Dome space defense program". Space.com. Retrieved May 21, 2025.
  52. ↑ Erwin, Sandra (May 15, 2025). "Space Force officials say it's too early to pin down Golden Dome costs". SpaceNews. Retrieved May 23, 2025.
  53. ↑ Erwin, Sandra (May 20, 2025). "Trump taps Space Force general to lead $175 billion Golden Dome missile defense program". SpaceNews. Retrieved May 27, 2025.
  54. ↑ "Secretary of Defense General Officer Announcements for June 18, 2025". U.S. Department of Defense. June 18, 2025. Retrieved June 18, 2025.
  55. ↑ "PN348 — Gen. Michael A. Guetlein — Space Force, 119th Congress (2025-2026)". U.S. Congress. July 17, 2025. Retrieved July 23, 2025.
  56. ↑ Albon, Courtney (July 22, 2025). "The Pentagon's Golden Dome program office is hiring". Defense News. Retrieved July 23, 2025.
  57. ↑ Stone, Mike; Mason, Jeff (April 17, 2025). "Exclusive: Musk's SpaceX is frontrunner to build Trump's Golden Dome missile shield". Reuters. Retrieved May 23, 2025.
  58. ↑ Youssef, Drew (February 28, 2025). "Military-Tech Startups Vie for Billions as Hegseth Shakes Up Pentagon Spending". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved May 23, 2025.
  59. ↑ Yeung, Jessie; Chowdhury, Maureen (May 21, 2025). "Trump details plan to build 'Golden Dome' missile shield by end of term". CNN . Retrieved May 21, 2025.
  60. ↑ "Golden Dome for America". Lockheed Martin. Retrieved May 21, 2025.
  61. ↑ Davenport, Christian; Neff, William; Steckelberg, Aaron (October 29, 2025). "Inside Trump's Golden Dome: High-stakes debate over missile-defense shield". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 20, 2026.
  62. 1 2 Parcover, Grace (December 11, 2025). "We Might Regret Golden Dome's Greatest Ambition". War on the Rocks. Retrieved December 13, 2025.
  63. 1 2 "MDA, SDA Announce Upcoming Launch of the Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensor an". U.S. Department of War. November 20, 2025. Archived from the original on October 4, 2025. Retrieved January 20, 2026.
  64. ↑ Peck, Michael (December 16, 2025). "Space Force wants advanced tech for space-based interceptors". Defense News. Retrieved January 20, 2026.
  65. ↑ Easley, Mikayla (December 19, 2025). "SDA awards $3.5B across 4 contracts for next phase of missile tracking satellites". DefenseScoop. Retrieved January 20, 2026.
  66. ↑ Peters, Robert (March 11, 2025). "A Missile Defense Review for the United States". The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved January 20, 2026.
  67. 1 2 "U.S. Hypersonic Weapons and Alternatives". Congressional Budget Office. January 31, 2023. Retrieved January 19, 2026.
  68. ↑ Freedberg, Sydney J. Jr. (March 20, 2020). "Hypersonics: Army, Navy Test Common Glide Body". Breaking Defense. Retrieved January 20, 2026.
  69. ↑ Mizokami, Kyle (July 20, 2020). "Trump Super Duper Missile Details". Popular Mechanics. Retrieved January 20, 2026.
  70. 1 2 Trevithick, Joseph (January 28, 2025). "Weaponizing Space Key To Trump's Iron Dome Missile Defense Shield Vision". The War Zone. Retrieved May 24, 2025.
  71. 1 2 3 4 Ellison, Riki (March 16, 2015). "Left of Launch". Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance . Retrieved May 24, 2025.
  72. ↑ Member, Any House (August 27, 2025). "Hypersonic Weapons: Background and Issues for Congress". Congress.gov. Retrieved January 20, 2026.
  73. ↑ The US is about fifty times larger than Israel.
  74. ↑ "Trump unveils plans for 'Golden Dome' defense system". BBC. Retrieved May 22, 2025.
  75. ↑ Debusmann Jr, Bernd (May 23, 2025). "Can Donald Trump build the 'Golden Dome' over the US?". BBC News . Retrieved May 24, 2025.
  76. ↑ "Golden Dome: Doubling Down on a Strategic Blunder". Arms Control Association. May 20, 2025. Retrieved May 29, 2025.
  77. ↑ Clark, Stephen (September 18, 2025). "Trump's Golden Dome will cost 10 to 100 times more than the Manhattan Project". Ars Technica. Retrieved September 19, 2025.
  78. ↑ Cassidy, Sean (May–June 2025). "Unleashing U.S. Power — Building Lethal, Accountable, and Overmatching Capabilities". Defense Acquisition magazine. Vol. 54, no. 3. Defense Acquisition University. p. 27. ISSN   2637-5060.
  79. ↑ Trevithick, Joseph (November 6, 2025). "Golden Dome Missile Shield Key To Ensuring Nuclear Second Strike Capability: U.S. Admiral". The War Zone. Retrieved November 7, 2025.
  80. ↑ "The Outer Space Treaty". www.unoosa.org. Retrieved August 12, 2025.
  81. 1 2 Roy, Denny (May 23, 2025). "Anti-missile system intensifies US-China nuclear competition". Asia Times. Retrieved May 27, 2025.
  82. 1 2 Brennan, David; Yiu, Karson (May 21, 2025). "Trump's 'Golden Dome' risks weaponization of space, China says". ABC News. Retrieved May 27, 2025.
  83. ↑ 高瞻. "China urges US to abandon 'Golden Dome' for global strategic stability". english.scio.gov.cn. Retrieved August 12, 2025.
  84. ↑ Deplano, Rossana (July 2023). "Inclusive Space Law: The Concept of Benefit Sharing in the Outer Space Treaty". International & Comparative Law Quarterly. 72 (3): 671–714. doi: 10.1017/S0020589323000234 . ISSN   0020-5893.
  85. ↑ Morgan, Forrest E. (April 2, 2010). "Deterrence and First-Strike Stability in Space: A Preliminary Assessment". RAND. Retrieved January 20, 2026.
  86. ↑ "Silver Bullet? Asking the Right Questions About Conventional Prompt Global Strike". Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. September 3, 2013. Retrieved January 20, 2026.
  87. ↑ Horovitz, Liviu; Süß, Juliana. "'Golden Dome' and the Illusory Promise of Invulnerability". Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP). Retrieved January 20, 2026.
  88. ↑ "Trump says US control of Greenland 'vital' for Golden Dome". France 24. January 14, 2026. Retrieved January 15, 2026.
  89. ↑ Hitchens, Theresa (February 26, 2025). "Too soon? GAO questions tech readiness of satellite laser links". Breaking Defense. Retrieved January 15, 2026.
  90. ↑ Singh, Smriti (January 14, 2026). "Why does Trump want Greenland? The Golden Dome missile shield and U.S. distrust of Europe Beyond Russia and China explain the Arctic strategy". TFIGlobal. Retrieved January 15, 2026.
  91. ↑ Grey, Evan (January 12, 2026). "Trump, Musk, and the Arctic: The Secret Fight for the World's Most Strategic Ground". SatNews. Archived from the original on January 12, 2026. Retrieved January 15, 2026.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  92. 1 2 "ESA-funded Optical Ground Station for fast and secure laser satellite communications begins construction in Greenland". connectivity.esa.int. November 19, 2025. Archived from the original on November 19, 2025. Retrieved January 15, 2026.
  93. ↑ "Pituffik Space Base: strengthening U.S. defense capabilities in the Arctic". The Watch Journal. USNORTHCOM. March 4, 2025. Retrieved January 15, 2026.
  94. ↑ "SDA Solicits Industry Input for Tranche 3 Ground Entry Point Expansion – SatNews". news.satnews.com. January 6, 2026. Archived from the original on January 7, 2026. Retrieved January 15, 2026.
  95. ↑ Karako, Tom (November 17, 2025). "Golden Dome faces challenges of size, scope and scale from every angle". Breaking Defense. Retrieved January 15, 2026.
  96. ↑ "Greenland and the scramble for the Arctic". GIS Reports. January 6, 2026. Retrieved January 15, 2026.
  97. ↑ Gillies, Rob (May 28, 2025). "Senior Canadian diplomat compares Trump's Golden Dome missile program to a 'protection racket'". AP News. Retrieved May 29, 2025.
  98. ↑ "Canada Willing to Join US 'Iron Dome' Missile Shield: Minister". The Defense Post. February 7, 2025. Retrieved May 21, 2025.
  99. ↑ Panetta, Alexander (May 20, 2025). "Canada wants to join Golden Dome missile-defence program, Trump says". CBC News . Retrieved May 21, 2025.
  100. ↑ "Trump says Canada will pay $61bn for Golden Dome, or become 51st state". Al Jazeera. May 28, 2025. Retrieved May 28, 2025.
  101. ↑ "Trump says Canada would pay $61B for Golden Dome, but zero as '51st state' - National | Globalnews.ca".
  102. ↑ "Trump claims Canada 'considering' becoming 51st state after King Charles' throne speech | Watch News Videos Online".
  103. ↑ "Canada rejected trump". The Economic Times. May 28, 2025.
  104. ↑ "China has minimal nuclear arsenal, seeks no arms race with US: white paper". South China Morning Post. November 27, 2025. Retrieved November 27, 2025.
  105. ↑ Pennington, Phil (June 1, 2025). "Defence Minister Judith Collins endorses Trump's Golden Dome amid contract frenzy". Radio New Zealand . Archived from the original on June 1, 2025. Retrieved June 1, 2025.
  106. ↑ "Russia says U.S. Golden Dome project undermines strategic stability". Reuters. May 27, 2025. Retrieved May 29, 2025.
  107. ↑ "Joint statement by the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China on Global Strategic Stability". Kremlin . Retrieved May 27, 2025.
  108. ↑ "Kremlin suggests 'Golden Dome' could lead to resumption of Russia-U.S. arms control contacts". Reuters. May 21, 2025. Retrieved May 27, 2025.
  109. ↑ Boram, Park (May 27, 2025). "N. Korea blasts U.S. Golden Dome missile defense plan as 'space nuclear war scenario'". Yonhap News Agency. Retrieved May 27, 2025.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.