Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies | |
---|---|
Signed | 27 January 1967 |
Location | London, Moscow and Washington, D.C. |
Effective | 10 October 1967 |
Condition | 5 ratifications, including the depositary Governments |
Parties | 115 [1] [2] [3] [4] |
Depositary | Governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the United States of America |
Languages | English, French, Russian, Spanish, Chinese and Arabic |
Full text | |
Outer Space Treaty of 1967 at Wikisource |
The Outer Space Treaty, formally the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, is a multilateral treaty that forms the basis of international space law. Negotiated and drafted under the auspices of the United Nations, it was opened for signature in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union on 27 January 1967, entering into force on 10 October 1967. As of March 2024 [update] , 115 countries are parties to the treaty—including all major spacefaring nations—and another 22 are signatories. [1] [5] [6]
The Outer Space Treaty was spurred by the development of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) in the 1950s, which could reach targets through outer space. [7] The Soviet Union's launch of Sputnik, the first artificial satellite, in October 1957, followed by a subsequent arms race with the United States, hastened proposals to prohibit the use of outer space for military purposes. On 17 October 1963, the U.N. General Assembly unanimously adopted a resolution prohibiting the introduction of weapons of mass destruction in outer space. Various proposals for an arms control treaty governing outer space were debated during a General Assembly session in December 1966, culminating in the drafting and adoption of the Outer Space Treaty the following January. [7]
Key provisions of the Outer Space Treaty include prohibiting nuclear weapons in space; limiting the use of the Moon and all other celestial bodies to peaceful purposes; establishing that space shall be freely explored and used by all nations; and precluding any country from claiming sovereignty over outer space or any celestial body. Although it forbids establishing military bases, testing weapons and conducting military maneuvers on celestial bodies, the treaty does not expressly ban all military activities in space, nor the establishment of military space forces or the placement of conventional weapons in space. [8] [9] From 1968 to 1984, the OST gave birth to four additional agreements: rules for activities on the Moon; liability for damages caused by spacecraft; the safe return of fallen astronauts; and the registration of space vehicles. [10]
OST provided many practical uses and was the most important link in the chain of international legal arrangements for space from the late 1950s to the mid-1980s. OST was at the heart of a 'network' of inter-state treaties and strategic power negotiations to achieve the best available conditions for nuclear weapons world security. The OST also declares that space is an area for free use and exploration by all and "shall be the province of all mankind". Drawing heavily from the Antarctic Treaty of 1961, the Outer Space Treaty likewise focuses on regulating certain activities and preventing unrestricted competition that could lead to conflict. [7] Consequently, it is largely silent or ambiguous on newly developed space activities such as lunar and asteroid mining. [11] [12] [13] Nevertheless, the Outer Space Treaty is the first and most foundational legal instrument of space law, [14] and its broader principles of promoting the civil and peaceful use of space continue to underpin multilateral initiatives in space, such as the International Space Station and the Artemis Program. [15] [16]
The Outer Space Treaty represents the basic legal framework of international space law. According to the U.N. Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), the core principles of the treaty are: [17]
Among its principles, it bars states party to the treaty from placing weapons of mass destruction in Earth orbit, installing them on the Moon or any other celestial body, or otherwise stationing them in outer space. It specifically limits the use of the Moon and other celestial bodies to peaceful purposes, and expressly prohibits their use for testing weapons of any kind, conducting military maneuvers, or establishing military bases, installations, and fortifications (Article IV). However, the treaty does not prohibit the placement of conventional weapons in orbit, and thus some highly destructive attack tactics, such as kinetic bombardment, are still potentially allowable. [18] In addition, the treaty explicitly allows the use of military personnel and resources to support peaceful uses of space, mirroring a common practice permitted by the Antarctic Treaty regarding that continent. The treaty also states that the exploration of outer space shall be done to benefit all countries and that space shall be free for exploration and use by all the states.
Article II of the treaty explicitly forbids any government from "appropriating" a celestial body such as the Moon or a planet, whether by declaration, use, occupation, or "any other means". [19] However, the state that launches a space object, such as a satellite or space station, retains jurisdiction and control over that object; [20] by extension, a state is also liable for damages caused by its space object. [21]
Article VI of the Outer Space Treaty deals with international responsibility, stating that "the activities of non-governmental entities in outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, shall require authorization and continuing supervision by the appropriate State Party to the Treaty" and that States Party shall bear international responsibility for national space activities whether carried out by governmental or non-governmental entities.
As a result of discussions arising from Project West Ford in 1963, a consultation clause was included in Article IX of the Outer Space Treaty: "A State Party to the Treaty which has reason to believe that an activity or experiment planned by another State Party in outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, would cause potentially harmful interference with activities in the peaceful exploration and use of outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, may request consultation concerning the activity or experiment." [22] [23]
Being primarily an arms control treaty for the peaceful use of outer space, the Outer Space Treaty offers limited and ambiguous regulations to newer space activities such as lunar and asteroid mining. [11] [13] [24] It is therefore debated whether the extraction of resources falls within the prohibitive language of appropriation, or whether the use of such resources encompasses the commercial use and exploitation. [25]
Seeking clearer guidelines, private U.S. companies lobbied the U.S. government, which in 2015 introduced the U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act of 2015 legalizing space mining. [26] Similar national legislation to legalize the appropriation of extraterrestrial resources are now being introduced by other countries, including Luxembourg, Japan, China, India, and Russia. [11] [24] [27] [28] In addition, the U.S. has led the creation of a series of bilateral agreements known as the Artemis Accords that seek to clarify a number of issue related to the Outer Space Treaty, including the use of space resources. [29] This has created some controversy regarding legal claims over the mining of celestial bodies for profit. [24] [25]
The "Declaration of the First Meeting of Equatorial Countries", also known as the "Bogota Declaration", was one of the few attempts to challenge the Outer Space Treaty. It was promulgated in 1976 by eight equatorial countries to assert sovereignty over those portions of the geostationary orbit that continuously lie over the signatory nations' territory. [30] These claims did not receive wider international support or recognition, and were subsequently abandoned. [31]
As the first international legal instrument concerning space, the Outer Space Treaty is considered the "cornerstone" of space law. [32] [33] It was also the first major achievement of the United Nations in this area of law, following the adoption of the first U.N. General Assembly resolution on space in 1958, [34] and the first meeting of the U.N. Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) the subsequent year. [35]
Within roughly a decade of the treaty's entry into force, several other treaties were brokered by the U.N. to further develop the legal framework for activities in space: [33]
With the exception of the Moon Treaty, to which only 18 nations are party, all other treaties on space law have been ratified by most major space-faring nations (namely those capable of orbital spaceflight). [36] COPUOS coordinates these treaties and other questions of space jurisdiction, aided by the U.N. Office for Outer Space Affairs.
The Outer Space Treaty was opened for signature in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union on 27 January 1967, and entered into force on 10 October 1967. As of March 2024, 115 countries are parties to the treaty, while another 22 have signed the treaty but have not completed ratification. [1]
Multiple dates indicate the different days in which states submitted their signature or deposition, which varied by location: (L) for London, (M) for Moscow, and (W) for Washington, D.C. Also indicated is whether the state became a party by way of signature and subsequent ratification, by accession to the treaty after it had closed for signature, or by succession of states after separation from some other party to the treaty.
State [1] [2] [3] [4] | Signed | Deposited | Method |
---|---|---|---|
Afghanistan |
|
| Ratification |
Algeria | 27 Jan 1992 (W) | Accession | |
Antigua and Barbuda |
| Succession from United Kingdom | |
Argentina |
| 26 Mar 1969 (M, W) | Ratification |
Armenia | 28 Mar 2018 (M) | Accession | |
Australia | 27 Jan 1967 (W) | 10 Oct 1967 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Austria | 20 Feb 1967 (L, M, W) | 26 Feb 1968 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Azerbaijan | 9 Sep 2015 (L) | Accession | |
Bahamas |
| Succession from United Kingdom | |
Bahrain | 7 Aug 2019 (M) | Accession | |
Bangladesh |
| Accession | |
Barbados | 12 Sep 1968 (W) | Accession | |
Belarus | 10 Feb 1967 (M) | 31 Oct 1967 (M) | Ratification |
Belgium |
|
| Ratification |
Benin |
| Accession | |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 29 Sep 2020 (L) | Accession | |
Brazil |
| 5 Mar 1969 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Bulgaria | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) |
| Ratification |
Burkina Faso | 3 Mar 1967 (W) | 18 Jun 1968 (W) | Ratification |
Canada | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) | 10 Oct 1967 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Chile |
| 8 Oct 1981 (W) | Ratification |
China |
| Accession | |
Colombia | 27 Jan 1967 (W) |
| Ratification |
Croatia | 10 Mar 2023 (W) | Accession | |
Cuba | 3 Jun 1977 (M) | Accession | |
Cyprus |
|
| Ratification |
Czech Republic |
| Succession from Czechoslovakia | |
Denmark | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) | 10 Oct 1967 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Dominican Republic | 27 Jan 1967 (W) | 21 Nov 1968 (W) | Ratification |
Ecuador |
| 7 Mar 1969 (W) | Ratification |
Egypt | 27 Jan 1967 (M, W) |
| Ratification |
El Salvador | 27 Jan 1967 (W) | 15 Jan 1969 (W) | Ratification |
Equatorial Guinea | 16 Jan 1989 (M) | Accession | |
Estonia | 19 Apr 2010 (M) | Accession | |
Fiji |
| Succession from United Kingdom | |
Finland | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) | 12 Jul 1967 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
France | 25 Sep 1967 (L, M, W) | 5 Aug 1970 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Germany | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) | 10 Feb 1971 (L, W) | Ratification |
Greece | 27 Jan 1967 (W) | 19 Jan 1971 (L) | Ratification |
Guinea-Bissau | 20 Aug 1976 (M) | Accession | |
Hungary | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) | 26 Jun 1967 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Iceland | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) | 5 Feb 1968 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
India | 3 Mar 1967 (L, M, W) | 18 Jan 1982 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Indonesia |
| 25 Jun 2002 (L) | Ratification |
Iraq |
|
| Ratification |
Ireland | 27 Jan 1967 (L, W) |
| Ratification |
Israel | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) |
| Ratification |
Italy | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) | 4 May 1972 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Jamaica | 29 Jun 1967 (L, M, W) |
| Ratification |
Japan | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) | 10 Oct 1967 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Kazakhstan | 11 Jun 1998 (M) | Accession | |
Kenya | 19 Jan 1984 (L) | Accession | |
North Korea | 5 Mar 2009 (M) | Accession | |
South Korea | 27 Jan 1967 (W) | 13 Oct 1967 (W) | Ratification |
Kuwait |
| Accession | |
Laos |
|
| Ratification |
Lebanon | 23 Feb 1967 (L, M, W) |
| Ratification |
Libya | 3 Jul 1968 (W) | Accession | |
Lithuania | 25 Mar 2013 (W) | Accession | |
Luxembourg |
| 17 Jan 2006 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Madagascar | 22 Aug 1968 (W) | Accession | |
Mali | 11 Jun 1968 (M) | Accession | |
Malta | 22 May 2017 (L) | Accession | |
Mauritius |
| Succession from United Kingdom | |
Mexico | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) | 31 Jan 1968 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Mongolia | 27 Jan 1967 (M) | 10 Oct 1967 (M) | Ratification |
Morocco |
| Accession | |
Myanmar | 22 May 1967 (L, M, W) | 18 Mar 1970 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Nepal |
|
| Ratification |
Netherlands | 10 Feb 1967 (L, M, W) | 10 Oct 1969 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
New Zealand | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) | 31 May 1968 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Nicaragua |
|
| Ratification |
Niger | 1 Feb 1967 (W) |
| Ratification |
Nigeria | 14 Nov 1967 (L) | Accession | |
Norway | 3 Feb 1967 (L, M, W) | 1 Jul 1969 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Oman | 4 Feb 2022 (L) | Accession | |
Pakistan | 12 Sep 1967 (L, M, W) | 8 Apr 1968 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Panama | 27 Jan 1967 (W) | 9 Aug 2023 (W) | Ratification |
Papua New Guinea |
| Succession from Australia | |
Paraguay | 22 Dec 2016 (L) | Accession | |
Peru | 30 Jun 1967 (W) |
| Ratification |
Poland | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) | 30 Jan 1968 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Portugal | 29 May 1996 (L) | Accession | |
Qatar | 13 Mar 2012 (W) | Accession | |
Romania | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) | 9 Apr 1968 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Russia | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) | 10 Oct 1967 (L, M, W) | Ratification as the Soviet Union |
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 13 May 1999 (L) | Succession from United Kingdom | |
San Marino |
|
| Ratification |
Saudi Arabia | 17 Dec 1976 (W) | Accession | |
Seychelles | 5 Jan 1978 (L) | Accession | |
Sierra Leone |
|
| Ratification |
Singapore | 10 Sep 1976 (L, M, W) | Accession | |
Slovakia |
| Succession from Czechoslovakia | |
Slovenia | 8 Feb 2019 (L) | Accession | |
South Africa | 1 Mar 1967 (W) |
| Ratification |
Spain |
| Accession | |
Sri Lanka | 10 Mar 1967 (L) | 18 Nov 1986 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Sweden | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) | 11 Oct 1967 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Switzerland |
| 18 Dec 1969 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Syria | 19 Nov 1968 (M) | Accession | |
Thailand | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) |
| Ratification |
Togo | 27 Jan 1967 (W) | 26 Jun 1989 (W) | Ratification |
Tonga |
| Succession from United Kingdom | |
Tunisia |
|
| Ratification |
Turkey | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) | 27 Mar 1968 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Uganda | 24 Apr 1968 (W) | Accession | |
Ukraine | 10 Feb 1967 (M) | 31 Oct 1967 (M) | Ratification |
United Arab Emirates | 4 Oct 2000 (W) | Accession | |
United Kingdom | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) | 10 Oct 1967 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
United States | 27 Jan 1967 (L, M, W) | 10 Oct 1967 (L, M, W) | Ratification |
Uruguay |
| 31 Aug 1970 (W) | Ratification |
Venezuela | 27 Jan 1967 (W) | 3 Mar 1970 (W) | Ratification |
Vietnam | 20 Jun 1980 (M) | Accession | |
Yemen | 1 Jun 1979 (M) | Accession | |
Zambia |
| Accession |
The Republic of China (Taiwan), which is currently recognized by 11 UN member states, ratified the treaty prior to the United Nations General Assembly's vote to transfer China's seat to the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1971. When the PRC subsequently ratified the treaty, they described the Republic of China's (ROC) ratification as "illegal". The ROC has committed itself to continue to adhere to the requirements of the treaty, and the United States has declared that it still considers the ROC to be "bound by its obligations". [5]
State | Signed | Deposited | Method |
---|---|---|---|
Republic of China | 27 Jan 1967 | 24 Jul 1970 | Ratification |
21 states have signed but not ratified the treaty.
State | Signed |
---|---|
Bolivia | 27 Jan 1967 (W) |
Botswana | 27 Jan 1967 (W) |
Burundi | 27 Jan 1967 (W) |
Cameroon | 27 Jan 1967 (W) |
Central African Republic | 27 Jan 1967 (W) |
Democratic Republic of the Congo |
|
Ethiopia |
|
Gambia | 2 Jun 1967 (L) |
Ghana |
|
Guyana | 3 Feb 1967 (W) |
Haiti | 27 Jan 1967 (W) |
Holy See | 5 Apr 1967 (L) |
Honduras | 27 Jan 1967 (W) |
Iran | 27 Jan 1967 (L) |
Jordan | 2 Feb 1967 (W) |
Lesotho | 27 Jan 1967 (W) |
Malaysia |
|
Philippines |
|
Rwanda | 27 Jan 1967 (W) |
Somalia | 2 Feb 1967 (W) |
Trinidad and Tobago |
|
The remaining UN member states and United Nations General Assembly observer states which have neither ratified nor signed the Outer Space Treaty are: [37]
Space law is the body of law governing space-related activities, encompassing both international and domestic agreements, rules, and principles. Parameters of space law include space exploration, liability for damage, weapons use, rescue efforts, environmental preservation, information sharing, new technologies, and ethics. Other fields of law, such as administrative law, intellectual property law, arms control law, insurance law, environmental law, criminal law, and commercial law, are also integrated within space law.
Colonization of the Moon is a process or concept employed by some proposals for robotic or human exploitation and settlement endeavours on the Moon. Often used as a synonym for its more specific element of settling the Moon, lunar or space colonization as a whole has become contested for perpetuating colonialism and its exploitive logic in space.
The Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, better known as the Moon Treaty or Moon Agreement, is a multilateral treaty that turns jurisdiction of all celestial bodies over to the participant countries. Thus, all activities would conform to international law, including the United Nations Charter.
The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA) is an office of the U.N. Secretariat that promotes and facilitates peaceful international cooperation in outer space. It works to establish or strengthen the legal and regulatory frameworks for space activities, and assists developing countries in using space science and technology for sustainable socioeconomic development.
Asteroid mining is the hypothetical extraction of materials from asteroids and other minor planets, including near-Earth objects.
Extraterrestrial real estate refers to claims of land ownership on other planets, natural satellites, or parts of space by certain organizations or individuals. Previous claims are not recognized by any authority, and have no legal standing. Nevertheless, some private individuals and organizations have claimed ownership of celestial bodies, such as the Moon, and are actively involved in "selling" parts of them through certificates of ownership termed "Lunar deeds", "Martian deeds" or similar.
The militarisation of space involves the placement and development of weaponry and military technology in outer space. The early exploration of space in the mid-20th century had, in part, a military motivation, as the United States and the Soviet Union used it as an opportunity to demonstrate ballistic-missile technology and other technologies having the potential for military application. Outer space has since been used as an operating location for military spacecraft such as imaging and communications satellites, and some ballistic missiles pass through outer space during their flight. As of 2018, known deployments of weapons stationed in space include only the Almaz space-station armament and pistols such as the TP-82 Cosmonaut survival pistol.
The United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) is a United Nations committee whose main task is to review and foster international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space, as well as to consider legal issues arising from the exploration of outer space.
A moonbase is a human outpost on or below the surface of the Moon. More than a mere site of activity or temporary camp, moonbases are extraterrestrial bases, supporting robotic or human activity, by providing surface infrastructure. Missions to the Moon have realized single-mission bases,, as well as some small permanent infrastructure like lunar laser ranging installations.
Space jurisdiction, a field addressing what countries can enforce various laws in space, has become more important as the private sector enters the field of space tourism. Under the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, while space and celestial bodies cannot be appropriated by nations, objects launched into space and personnel on board them remain under the jurisdiction of the state of registry.
Space-based economy is economic activity in outer space, including asteroid mining, space manufacturing, space trade, space burial, space advertising and construction performed in space such as the building of space stations.
Space policy is the political decision-making process for, and application of, public policy of a state regarding spaceflight and uses of outer space, both for civilian and military purposes. International treaties, such as the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, attempt to maximize the peaceful uses of space and restrict the militarization of space.
The politics of outer space includes space treaties, law in space, international cooperation and conflict in space exploration, international economics, and the hypothetical political impact of any contact with extraterrestrial intelligence.
Common heritage of humanity is a principle of international law that holds the defined territorial areas and elements of humanity's common heritage should be held in trust for future generations and be protected from exploitation by individual nation states or corporations.
The space policy of the United States includes both the making of space policy through the legislative process, and the implementation of that policy in the United States' civilian and military space programs through regulatory agencies. The early history of United States space policy is linked to the US–Soviet Space Race of the 1960s, which gave way to the Space Shuttle program. At the moment, the US space policy is aimed at the exploration of the Moon and the subsequent colonization of Mars.
The Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act, sometimes referred to as the Spurring Private Aerospace Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship (SPACE) Act of 2015, is an update of the United States Government of its commercial space use, legislated in 2015. The update to US law explicitly allows US citizens and industries to "engage in the commercial exploration and exploitation of space resources" including water and minerals. The right does not extend to extraterrestrial life, so anything that is alive may not be exploited commercially.
The Moon bears substantial natural resources which could be exploited in the future. Potential lunar resources may encompass processable materials such as volatiles and minerals, along with geologic structures such as lava tubes that, together, might enable lunar habitation. The use of resources on the Moon may provide a means of reducing the cost and risk of lunar exploration and beyond.
The Artemis Accords are a series of non-binding multilateral arrangements between the United States government and other world governments that elaborates on the norms expected to be followed in outer space. The Accords are related to the Artemis program, an American-led effort to return humans to the Moon by 2026, with the ultimate goal of expanding space exploration to Mars and beyond.
Space sustainability aims to maintain the safety and health of the space environment, as well as planetary environments.
Space diplomacy refers to the integration of the collaboration of the knowledge, technology, and legislation involved in science diplomacy as applied to the expanded exploration of space. As diplomatic relationships are integral to the mitigation of various health, scientific, natural or technological issues across nations, space diplomacy is a growing field in which various nations can come to a consensus on what is fair when it comes to the exploration and commercialization of space travel.