Budget of NASA

Last updated

As a federal agency, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) receives its funding from the annual federal budget passed by the United States Congress. The following charts detail the amount of federal funding allotted to NASA each year over its history to pursue programs in aeronautics research, robotic spaceflight, technology development, and human space exploration programs.

Contents

Annual budget

NASA's budget as percentage of federal total, from 1958 to 2017 NASA-Budget-Federal.svg
NASA's budget as percentage of federal total, from 1958 to 2017

NASA's budget for financial year (FY) 2020 is $22.6 billion. [1] It represents 0.48% of the $4.7 trillion the United States plans to spend in the fiscal year. [2]

Since its inception the United States has spent nearly US$650 billion (in nominal dollars) on NASA.

History of NASA's annual budget (millions of US dollars)
Calendar Year NACA Budget [3]
Nominal Dollars (Millions)%of Federal Budget [4] 2023 Constant Dollars
(Millions)
19150.0050.00%0.128
19160.0050.00%0.119
19170.0880.00%1.770
19180.1120.00%1.920
19190.2050.00%3.067
19200.1750.00%2.265
19210.2000.00%2.892
19220.2000.01%3.081
19230.2260.01%3.414
19240.3070.01%4.646
19250.4700.02%6.951
19260.5340.02%7.808
19270.5130.02%7.630
19280.5500.02%8.324
19290.8370.03%12.665
19301.3000.04%20.147
19311.3210.04%22.493
19321.0510.02%19.856
19330.9200.02%18.316
19340.9540.01%18.419
19351.2560.02%23.723
19362.5440.03%47.366
19371.6310.02%29.306
19381.2810.02%23.510
19394.0640.04%75.669
19404.1800.04%77.274
194111.2000.08%197.2
194219.8660.06%315.4
194325.4290.03%380.4
194438.3920.04%564.6
194540.9420.04%588.7
194624.0520.04%319.2
194730.7130.09%356.4
194843.4490.15%466.6
194948.6520.13%529.1
19501280.30%1,374.6
195163.0680.14%627.8
195269.0000.10%673.9
195366.2860.09%642.5
195462.4390.09%600.7
195555.8600.08%539.4
195672.7000.10%691.7
195776.6770.10%706.2
19581170.14%1,847.3
19591010.11%2,188.8
Calendar
Year		NASA budget
Nominal Dollars
(Millions)		% of Fed Budget [5] [6] 2023 Constant Dollars
(Millions)
1958890.1%940
19591450.2%1,516
19604010.5%4,130
19617440.9%7,586
19621,2571.18%12,661
19632,5522.29%25,398
19644,1713.52%40,976
19655,0924.31%49,232
19665,9334.41%55,715
19675,4253.45%49,572
19684,7222.65%41,373
19694,2512.31%35,320
19703,7521.92%29,437
19713,3821.61%25,444
19723,4231.48%24,933
19733,3121.35%22,732
19743,2551.21%20,110
19753,2690.98%18,510
19763,6710.99%19,656
19774,0020.98%20,122
19784,1640.91%19,452
19794,3800.87%18,388
19804,9590.84%18,338
19815,5370.82%18,557
19826,1550.83%19,433
19836,8530.85%20,964
19847,0550.83%20,690
19857,2510.77%20,542
19867,4030.75%20,577
19877,5910.76%20,358
19889,0920.85%23,423
Calendar
Year		NASA budget
Nominal Dollars
(Millions)		% of Fed Budget [5] [6] 2023 Constant Dollars
(Millions)
198911,0360.96%27,126
199012,4290.99%28,986
199113,8781.05%31,045
199213,9611.01%30,312
199314,3051.01%30,172
199413,6950.94%28,153
199513,3780.88%26,750
199613,8810.89%26,967
199714,3600.90%27,255
199814,1940.86%26,533
199913,6360.80%24,940
200013,4280.75%23,758
200114,0950.76%24,254
200214,4050.72%24,402
200314,6100.68%24,198
200415,1520.66%24,442
200515,6020.63%24,340
200615,1250.57%22,860
200715,8610.58%23,307
200817,8330.60%25,236
200917,782 [7] 0.57%25,254
201018,724 [8] 0.52%26,162
201118,448 [9] 0.51%24,987
201217,770 [10] 0.50%23,583
201316,865 [11] 0.49%22,059
201417,647 [12] 0.50%22,712
201518,010 [13] 0.49%23,150
201619,300 [14] 0.50%24,502
201719,508 [15] 0.47%24,249
201820,736 [16] 0.50%25,160
201921,500 [17] 0.47%25,622
202022,629 [18] 0.48%26,559
202123,271 [19]
202224,041
202325,384
202424,875

Notes for table: Sources for a part of these data:

Cost of Apollo program

NASA's spending peaked in 1966 during the Apollo program. NASA budget linegraph BH.PNG
NASA's spending peaked in 1966 during the Apollo program.

NASA's budget peaked in 1964–66 when it consumed roughly 4% of all federal spending. The agency was building up to the first Moon landing and the Apollo program was a top national priority, consuming more than half of NASA's budget and driving NASA's workforce to more than 34,000 employees and 375,000 contractors from industry and academia. [20]

In 1973, NASA submitted congressional testimony reporting the total cost of Project Apollo as $25.4 billion (about $182 billion in 2023 dollars). [21]

Economic impact of NASA funding

A November 1971 study of NASA released by MRIGlobal (formerly Midwest Research Institute) of Kansas City, Missouri concluded that "the $25 billion in 1958 dollars spent on civilian space R & D during the 1958–1969 period has returned $52 billion through 1971 – and will continue to produce payoffs through 1987, at which time the total pay-off will have been $181 billion. The discounted rate of return for this investment will have been 33 percent." [22]

A map from NASA's web site illustrating its economic impact on the U.S. states (as of FY2003) NASA dollars.jpg
A map from NASA's web site illustrating its economic impact on the U.S. states (as of FY2003)

Other statistics on NASA's economic impact may be found in the 1976 Chase Econometrics Associates, Inc. reports [23] and backed by the 1989 Chapman Research report, which examined 259 non-space applications of NASA technology during an eight-year period (1976–1984) and found more than:

According to a 1992 Nature commentary, these 259 applications represent ". . .only 1% of an estimated 25,000 to 30,000 Space program spin-offs." [24]

A 2013 report prepared by the Tauri Group for NASA showed that NASA invested nearly $5 billion in U.S. manufacturing in FY 2012, with nearly $2 billion of that going to the technology sector. NASA also develops and commercializes technology, some of which can generate over $1 billion in revenue per year over multiple years [25]

In 2014, the American Helicopter Society criticized NASA and the government for reducing the annual rotorcraft budget from $50 million in 2000 to $23 million in 2013, impacting commercial opportunities. [26]

The 2017 Economic Impact Report prepared by NASA for their Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) awards found that for FY 2016, these programs created 2,412 jobs, $474 million in economic output, and $57.3 million in fiscal impact with an initial investment of $172.9 million. [27]

Public perception

The perceived national security threat posed by early Soviet leads in spaceflight drove NASA's budget to its peak, both in real inflation-adjusted dollars and in a percentage of the total federal budget (4.41% in 1966). But the apparent U.S. victory in the Space Race — landing men on the Moon — erased the perceived threat, and NASA was unable to sustain political support for its vision of an even more ambitious Space Transportation System entailing reusable Earth-to-orbit shuttles, a permanent space station, lunar bases, and a human mission to Mars. Only a scaled-back space shuttle was approved, and NASA's funding leveled off at just under 1% in 1976, then declined to 0.75% in 1986. After a brief increase to 1.01% in 1992, it declined to about 0.5% in 2013.

To help with public perception and to raise awareness regarding the widespread benefits of NASA-funded programs and technologies, NASA instituted the Spinoffs publication. This was a direct offshoot of the Technology Utilization Program Report, a "publication dedicated to informing the scientific community about available NASA technologies, and ongoing requests received for supporting information." according to the NASA Spinoff about page the technologies in these reports created interest in the technology transfer concept, its successes, and its use as a public awareness tool. The reports generated such keen interest by the public that NASA decided to make them into an attractive publication. Thus, the first four-color edition of Spinoff was published in 1976. [28]

The American public, on average, believes NASA's budget has a much larger share of the federal budget than it actually does. A 1997 poll reported that Americans had an average estimate of 20% for NASA's share of the federal budget, far higher than the actual 0.5% to under 1% that has been maintained throughout the late '90s and first decade of the 2000s. [29] It is estimated that most Americans spent less than $9 on NASA through personal income tax in 2009. [30]

However, there has been a recent movement to communicate discrepancy between perception and reality of NASA's budget as well as lobbying to return the funding back to the 1970–1990 level. The United States Senate Science Committee met in March 2012 where astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson testified that "Right now, NASA's annual budget is half a penny on your tax dollar. For twice that—a penny on a dollar—we can transform the country from a sullen, dispirited nation, weary of economic struggle, to one where it has reclaimed its 20th-century birthright to dream of tomorrow." [31] [32] Inspired by Tyson's advocacy and remarks, the Penny4NASA campaign was initiated in 2012 by John Zeller and advocates the doubling of NASA's budget to one percent of the Federal Budget, or one "penny on the dollar." [33]

In 2018, Business Insider surveyed approximately 1,000 US residents to determine what they believed was the annual NASA budget. The average respondent estimated that NASA's budget was 6.4% of annual federal spending, when it was actually 0.5%. In a follow-up question, 85% of respondents stated that NASA funding should be increased, despite the majority of responses overestimating NASA's actual budget. [34]

NASA's cost overruns and time delays have been blamed by some on NASA's usage of cost-plus contracts and avoidance of fixed-price contracts. [35]

Political opposition to NASA funding

Public opposition to NASA and its budget dates back to the Apollo era. Critics have cited more immediate concerns, like social welfare programs, as reasons to cut funding to the agency. [36] Furthermore, they have questioned the return on investment (ROI) feasibility of NASA's research and development. In 1968, physicist Ralph Lapp argued that if NASA really did have a positive ROI, it should be able to sustain itself as a private company, and not require federal funding. [36] More recently, critics have faulted NASA for sinking money into the Space Shuttle program, reducing funding available for its long-term missions to Mars and deep space. [37] Human missions to Mars have also been denounced for their inefficiency and large cost compared to uncrewed missions. [38] In the 2010s, Republicans in Congress increasingly opposed the Earth science aspects of NASA spending, arguing that spending on Earth science programs such as climate research was in pursuit of political agendas. [39]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Military budget of the United States</span> Yearly spending of the United States military

The military budget of the United States is the largest portion of the discretionary federal budget allocated to the Department of Defense (DoD), or more broadly, the portion of the budget that goes to any military-related expenditures. The military budget pays the salaries, training, and health care of uniformed and civilian personnel, maintains arms, equipment and facilities, funds operations, and develops and buys new items. The budget funds six branches of the US military: the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, Air Force, and Space Force.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States federal budget</span> Budget of the U.S. federal government

The United States budget comprises the spending and revenues of the U.S. federal government. The budget is the financial representation of the priorities of the government, reflecting historical debates and competing economic philosophies. The government primarily spends on healthcare, retirement, and defense programs. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office provides extensive analysis of the budget and its economic effects. CBO estimated in February 2024 that Federal debt held by the public is projected to rise from 99 percent of GDP in 2024 to 116 percent in 2034 and would continue to grow if current laws generally remained unchanged. Over that period, the growth of interest costs and mandatory spending outpaces the growth of revenues and the economy, driving up debt. Those factors persist beyond 2034, pushing federal debt higher still, to 172 percent of GDP in 2054.

The budget of the United States government for fiscal year 2007 was produced through a budget process involving both the legislative and executive branches of the federal government. While the Congress has the constitutional "power of the purse", the President and his appointees play a major role in budget deliberations. Since 1976, the federal fiscal year has started on October 1 of each year.

The 2008 United States Federal Budget began as a proposal by President George W. Bush to fund government operations for October 1, 2007 – September 30, 2008. The requested budget was submitted to the 110th Congress on February 5, 2007.

The United States federal budget for fiscal year 2009 began as a spending request submitted by President George W. Bush to the 110th Congress. The final resolution written and submitted by the 110th Congress to be forwarded to the President was approved by the House on June 5, 2008.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 United States federal budget</span> United States budget request

The United States Federal Budget for Fiscal Year 2010, titled A New Era of Responsibility: Renewing America's Promise, is a spending request by President Barack Obama to fund government operations for October 2009–September 2010. Figures shown in the spending request do not reflect the actual appropriations for Fiscal Year 2010, which must be authorized by Congress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Review of United States Human Space Flight Plans Committee</span> NASA group established by the Obama administration to clarify US aerospaces future

The Review of United States Human Space Flight Plans Committee, better known as the HSF Committee, Augustine Commission, or Augustine Committee, was a group convened by NASA at the request of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), to review the nation's human spaceflight plans to ensure "a vigorous and sustainable path to achieving its boldest aspirations in space." The review was announced by the OSTP on May 7, 2009. It covered human spaceflight options after the time NASA had planned to retire the Space Shuttle. A summary report was provided to the OSTP Director John Holdren, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), and NASA Administrator on September 8, 2009. The estimated cost associated with the review was expected to be US$3 million. The committee was scheduled to be active for 180 days; the report was released on October 22, 2009.

The United States Federal Budget for Fiscal Year 1997, was a spending request by President Bill Clinton to fund government operations for October 1996-September 1997. Figures shown in the spending request do not reflect the actual appropriations for Fiscal Year 1997, which must be authorized by Congress. The requested budget was submitted to Congress on February 5, 1996.

The 2011 United States federal budget was the United States federal budget to fund government operations for the fiscal year 2011. The budget was the subject of a spending request by President Barack Obama. The actual appropriations for Fiscal Year 2011 had to be authorized by the full Congress before it could take effect, according to the U.S. budget process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Space policy of the Barack Obama administration</span> US federal plans for NASA post-2010

The space policy of the Barack Obama administration was announced by U.S. President Barack Obama on April 15, 2010, at a major space policy speech at Kennedy Space Center. He committed to increasing NASA funding by $6 billion over five years and completing the design of a new heavy-lift launch vehicle by 2015 and to begin construction thereafter. He also predicted a U.S.-crewed orbital Mars mission by the mid-2030s, preceded by the Asteroid Redirect Mission by 2025. In response to concerns over job losses, Obama promised a $40 million effort to help Space Coast workers affected by the cancellation of the Space Shuttle program and Constellation program.

The NASA Authorization Act of 2010 is a U.S. law authorizing NASA appropriations for fiscal years 2011, 2012, 2013 with the same top-line budget values as requested by US President Barack Obama. It resulted from the Augustine Commission's review of then-current crewed space flight plans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Space policy of the United States</span>

The space policy of the United States includes both the making of space policy through the legislative process, and the implementation of that policy in the United States' civilian and military space programs through regulatory agencies. The early history of United States space policy is linked to the US–Soviet Space Race of the 1960s, which gave way to the Space Shuttle program. At the moment, the US space policy is aimed at the exploration of the Moon and the subsequent colonization of Mars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Expenditures in the United States federal budget</span> Overview of expenditures in the United States federal budget

The United States federal budget consists of mandatory expenditures, discretionary spending for defense, Cabinet departments and agencies, and interest payments on debt. This is currently over half of U.S. government spending, the remainder coming from state and local governments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Space Launch System</span> NASA super heavy-lift expendable launch vehicle

The Space Launch System (SLS) is an American super heavy-lift expendable launch vehicle used by NASA. As the primary launch vehicle of the Artemis Moon landing program, SLS is designed to launch the crewed Orion spacecraft on a trans-lunar trajectory. The first SLS launch was the uncrewed Artemis I, which took place on 16 November 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orion (spacecraft)</span> American–European spacecraft class for the Artemis program

Orion is a partially reusable crewed spacecraft used in NASA's Artemis program. The spacecraft consists of a Crew Module (CM) space capsule designed by Lockheed Martin and the European Service Module (ESM) manufactured by Airbus Defence and Space. Capable of supporting a crew of four beyond low Earth orbit, Orion can last up to 21 days undocked and up to six months docked. It is equipped with solar panels, an automated docking system, and glass cockpit interfaces modeled after those used in the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. A single AJ10 engine provides the spacecraft's primary propulsion, while eight R-4D-11 engines, and six pods of custom reaction control system engines developed by Airbus, provide the spacecraft's secondary propulsion. Orion is intended to be launched atop a Space Launch System (SLS) rocket, with a tower launch escape system.

The 2013 United States federal budget is the budget to fund government operations for the fiscal year 2013, which began on October 1, 2012, and ended on September 30, 2013. The original spending request was issued by President Barack Obama in February 2012.

As a result of the Budget Control Act of 2011, a set of automatic spending cuts to United States federal government spending in particular of outlays were initially set to begin on January 1, 2013. They were postponed by two months by the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 until March 1 when this law went into effect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Penny4NASA</span>

Penny4NASA was a campaign run by the Space Advocates nonprofit, a nonpartisan organization seeking to promote the expansion of funding for the economic, scientific and cultural value of the United States' national space program by advocating an increase in the budget for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to at least one percent of the United States Federal Budget. Penny4NASA attempted to promote public awareness of the NASA mission and budget by producing a series of outreach videos, as well as performing educational outreach via social media.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NASA Authorization Act of 2014</span> US House bill on aerospace science

The NASA Authorization Act of 2014 is a bill that would authorize the appropriation of $17.6 billion in fiscal year 2014 to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). NASA would use the funding for human exploration of space, the Space Launch System, the Orion spacecraft, the Commercial Crew Program, the International Space Station (ISS), and various technological and educational projects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 United States federal budget</span>

The United States federal budget for fiscal year 2018, which ran from October 1, 2017, to September 30, 2018, was named America First: A Budget Blueprint to Make America Great Again. It was the first budget proposed by newly elected president Donald Trump, submitted to the 115th Congress on March 16, 2017.

References

  1. ↑ "NASA's FY 2020 Budget". The Planetary Society. Retrieved 2019-12-31.
  2. ↑ White House Office of Management and Budget "Table 1.1—Summary of Receipts, Outlays, and Surpluses or Deficits (-): 1789–2024|language=en-US|access-date=2019-12-31}"
  3. ↑ The National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics (NACA) was the precursor to NASA. It was subsumed by the new agency under the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, ceasing on October 1, 1958.
  4. ↑ "Appendix C". history.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2021-08-27.
  5. 1 2 % of total federal expenditures from: "NASA budgets: US spending on space travel since 1958 UPDATED". TheGuardian.com . February 2010. Retrieved November 20, 2022.
  6. 1 2 1999–2010 based on federal outlays from: Federal budget (United States)#Total outlays in recent budget submissions
  7. ↑ "2011 Budget Overview" (PDF). nasa.gov. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-02-01. Retrieved 2010-11-15.
  8. ↑ Berger, Brian (2011-04-13). "U.S. Budget Compromise Includes $18.5 Billion for NASA". Space.com. Retrieved 30 January 2012.
  9. ↑ "NASA FY 2013 President's Budget Request Summary" (PDF). NASA. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 6, 2021. Retrieved November 20, 2022.
  10. ↑ "NASA FY 2014 President's Budget Request Summary" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved November 20, 2022.
  11. ↑ "NASA FY 2015 President's Budget Request" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved November 20, 2022.
  12. ↑ "2016 NASA Budget Estimates" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved November 20, 2022.
  13. ↑ Clark, Stephen (2014-12-14). "NASA gets budget hike in spending bill passed by Congress". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 2014-12-15.
  14. ↑ "Agency fact sheet: NASA's FY 2017 budget request" (PDF). 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2017.
  15. ↑ "S.442 – National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transition Authorization Act of 2017" . Retrieved March 21, 2017.
  16. ↑ "NASA receives $20.7 billion in omnibus appropriations bill". Science News. 22 March 2018. Retrieved 23 March 2018.
  17. ↑ Smith, Marcia. "NASA's FY 2019 Budget Fact Sheet" (PDF). Space Policy Online. Retrieved 31 December 2019.
  18. ↑ "National Aeronautics and Space Administration FY 2021 President's Budget Requests Summary" (PDF). National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Retrieved 23 April 2020.
  19. ↑ "National Aeronautics and Space Administration FY 2022 President's Budget Requests Summary" (PDF). National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Retrieved 16 September 2021.
  20. ↑ Levine, Arnold S. (1983). "Chapter 4: The NASA Acquisition Process: Contracting For Research and Development". Managing NASA in the Apollo era : an administrative history of the U.S. civilian space program, 1958-1969. Scientific and Technical Information Branch, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. OCLC   317074611.
  21. ↑ United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Astronautics. (1973). 1974 NASA authorization: hearings, Ninety-third Congress, first session, on H.R. 4567 . Page 1271. Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off.
  22. ↑ "Economic Impact of Stimulated Economic Activity.". nasa.gov. Retrieved 14 Nov. 2018.
  23. ↑ "The Economic Impact of NASA R&D Spending: Preliminary Executive Summary.", April 1975. Also: " Relative Impact of NASA Expenditure on the Economy. ", March 18, 1975
  24. ↑ Bezdek, Roger H.; Wendling, Robert M. (January 9, 1992). "Sharing out NASA's spoils". Nature . 355 (6356). Nature Publishing Group: 105–106. Bibcode:1992Natur.355..105B. doi:10.1038/355105a0. S2CID   46464236.
  25. ↑ "NASA Socio-Economic Impacts". Archived 2017-08-01 at the Wayback Machine National Institute of Standards and Technology. Retrieved 14 Nov. 2018.
  26. ↑ Hirschberg, Mike. "Investing in Tomorrow's Civil Rotorcraft" American Helicopter Society , July–August 2014. Accessed: 7 October 2014. Archived on 7 October 2014
  27. ↑ "2017 Economic Impact Report". nasa.gov. Retrieved 14 Nov. 2018.
  28. ↑ "About Spinoff". NASA. n.d. Archived from the original on 2014-12-08. Retrieved 26 Nov 2014.
  29. ↑ Launius, Roger D. "Public opinion polls and perceptions of US human spaceflight". Division of Space History, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution.
  30. ↑ "Personal Income Tax Paid To NASA In 2009 By Income Level". NASACost.com.
  31. ↑ "Past, Present, and Future of NASA – U.S. Senate Testimony". Hayden Planetarium. 7 Mar 2012. Retrieved 4 Dec 2012.
  32. ↑ "Past, Present, and Future of NASA – U.S. Senate Testimony (Video)". Hayden Planetarium. 7 Mar 2012. Retrieved 4 Dec 2012.
  33. ↑ "Why We Fight – Penny4NASA". Penny4NASA. Retrieved 30 Nov 2012.
  34. ↑ Mosher, Dave; Lee, Samantha (December 18, 2018). "85% of Americans would give NASA a giant raise, but most don't know how little the space agency gets as a share of the federal budget". Insider. Retrieved September 6, 2022.
  35. ↑ Berger, Eric (27 August 2024). "NASA has to be trolling with the latest cost estimate of its SLS launch tower". Ars Technica. Retrieved 30 August 2024.
  36. 1 2 "A Case for Cutting NASA's Budget". The New Republic. Retrieved 2018-12-04.
  37. ↑ "NASA's Shuttle Program Cost $209 Billion — Was it Worth It?". Space.com. Retrieved 2018-12-04.
  38. ↑ "Should NASA Ditch Manned Missions to Mars?". Space.com. Retrieved 2018-12-04.
  39. ↑ Eric Berger (October 29, 2015) Republicans outraged over NASA earth science programs… that Reagan began. Ars Technica

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.