Buran programme

Last updated

Buran programme
Космическая программа «Энергия» — «Буран»
Kosmicheskaya Programma Energia — Buran
Antonov An-225 with Soviet space shuttle Buran on top.jpeg
The Antonov An-225 Mriya carrying a Buran orbiter in 1989.
Program overview
Country Soviet Union  / Russia
Organisation Roscosmos (1991–1993)
Purposecrewed orbital flight and reentry
StatusCancelled
Programme history
Duration1971–1993
First flight OK-GLI Flight 1 (10 November 1985)
Last flight OK-1K1 (15 November 1988)
Successes1
Failures0
Launch site(s) Baikonur pad 110/37
Vehicle information
Crewed vehicle(s)Buran-class orbiter
Crew capacity10 cosmonauts
Launch vehicle(s) Energia

The Buran programme (Russian : Буран, IPA: [bʊˈran] , "Snowstorm", "Blizzard"), also known as the "VKK Space Orbiter programme" (Russian : ВКК «Воздушно-Космический Корабль», lit. 'Air and Space Ship'), [1] was a Soviet and later Russian reusable spacecraft project that began in 1974 at the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute in Moscow and was formally suspended in 1993. [2] In addition to being the designation for the whole Soviet/Russian reusable spacecraft project, Buran was also the name given to orbiter 1K, which completed one uncrewed spaceflight in 1988 and was the only Soviet reusable spacecraft to be launched into space. The Buran-class orbiters used the expendable Energia rocket as a launch vehicle.

Contents

The Buran programme was started by the Soviet Union as a response to the United States Space Shuttle program [3] and benefited from extensive espionage undertaken by the KGB of the unclassified US Space Shuttle program, [4] resulting in many superficial and functional similarities between American and Soviet Shuttle designs. [5] Although the Buran class was similar in appearance to NASA's Space Shuttle orbiter, and could similarly operate as a re-entry spaceplane, its final internal and functional design was different. For example, the main engines during launch were on the Energia rocket and were not taken into orbit by the spacecraft. Smaller rocket engines on the craft's body provided propulsion in orbit and de-orbital burns, similar to the Space Shuttle's OMS pods. Unlike the Space Shuttle whose first orbital spaceflight was accomplished in April 1981, Buran, whose first and only spaceflight occurred in November 1988, had a capability of flying uncrewed missions, as well as performing fully automated landings. The project was the largest and the most expensive in the history of Soviet space exploration. [2]

Background

The Soviet reusable spacecraft programme has its roots in the late 1950s, at the very beginning of the space age. The idea of Soviet reusable space flight is very old, though it was neither continuous nor consistently organized. Before Buran, no project of the programme reached operational status.

The first step toward a reusable Soviet spacecraft was the 1954 Burya, a high-altitude prototype jet aircraft/cruise missile. Several test flights were made before it was cancelled by order of the Central Committee. The Burya had the goal of delivering a nuclear payload, presumably to the United States, and then returning to base. The Burya programme was cancelled by the USSR in favor of a decision to develop ICBMs instead. The next iteration of a reusable spacecraft was the Zvezda design, which also reached a prototype stage. Decades later, another project with the same name would be used as a service module for the International Space Station. After Zvezda, there was a hiatus in reusable projects until Buran.

The Buran orbital vehicle programme was developed in response to the U.S. Space Shuttle program, which raised considerable concerns among the Soviet military and especially Defense Minister Dmitry Ustinov. An authoritative chronicler of the Soviet and later Russian space programme, the academic Boris Chertok, recounts how the programme came into being. [6] According to Chertok, after the U.S. developed its Space Shuttle program, the Soviet military became suspicious that it could be used for military purposes, due to its enormous payload, several times that of previous U.S. launch vehicles. Officially, the Buran orbital vehicle was designed for the delivery to orbit and return to Earth of spacecraft, cosmonauts, and supplies. Both Chertok and Gleb Lozino-Lozinskiy (General Designer and General Director of NPO Molniya) suggest that from the beginning, the programme was military in nature; however, the exact military capabilities, or intended capabilities, of the Buran programme remain classified.

Like its American counterpart, the Buran orbital vehicle, when in transit from its landing sites back to the launch complex, was transported on the back of a large jet aeroplane – the Antonov An-225 Mriya transport aircraft, which was designed in part for this task and was the largest aircraft in the world to fly multiple times. [7] Before the Mriya was ready (after the Buran had flown), the Myasishchev VM-T Atlant, a variant on the Soviet Myasishchev M-4 Molot (Hammer) bomber (NATO code: Bison), fulfilled the same role.

History of the Buran programme

The Buran orbiter ranks among the world's first spaceplanes, with the North American X-15, the Space Shuttle, SpaceShipOne, and the Boeing X-37. Of these, only the Buran and X-37 spaceflights were uncrewed. The World's First Five Spaceplanes.png
The Buran orbiter ranks among the world's first spaceplanes, with the North American X-15, the Space Shuttle, SpaceShipOne, and the Boeing X-37. Of these, only the Buran and X-37 spaceflights were uncrewed.

Programme development

The development of the Buran began in the early 1970s as a response to the U.S. Space Shuttle program. Soviet officials were concerned about a perceived military threat posed by the U.S. Space Shuttle. In their opinion, the Shuttle's 30-ton payload-to-orbit capacity and, more significantly, its 15-ton payload return capacity, were a clear indication that one of its main objectives would be to place massive experimental laser weapons into orbit that could destroy enemy missiles from a distance of several thousands of kilometres. Their reasoning was that such weapons could only be effectively tested in actual space conditions and that to cut their development time and save costs it would be necessary to regularly bring them back to Earth for modifications and fine-tuning. [8] Soviet officials were also concerned that the U.S. Space Shuttle could make a sudden dive into the atmosphere to drop nuclear bombs on Moscow. [9] [10]

In 1974, Valentin Glushko's design bureau, OKB-1 (later NPO Energiya), proposed a new family of heavy-lift rockets called RLA (Russian : РЛА, «Ракетные Летательные Аппараты», romanized: Raketnyye Letatel'niye Apparaty, lit. 'Rocket Flying Apparatus'). The RLA concept included the use of kerosene and liquid hydrogen as fuel, and liquid oxygen as oxidizer (both new technologies in the Soviet space programme), with the shuttle orbiter being one possible payload. [11] While NPO Molniya conducted development under the lead of Gleb Lozino-Lozinskiy, the Soviet Union's Military-Industrial Commission, or VPK, was tasked with collecting all data it could on the U.S. Space Shuttle. Under the auspices of the KGB, the VPK was able to amass documentation on the American shuttle's airframe designs, design analysis software, materials, flight computer systems and propulsion systems. The KGB targeted many university research project documents and databases, including Caltech, MIT, Princeton, Stanford and others. The thoroughness of the acquisition of data was made much easier as the U.S. shuttle development was unclassified. [4]

By 1975, NPO Energiya had come up with two competing designs for the orbiter vehicle: the MTKVP (Russian : МТКВП, «Многоразовый Транспортный Корабль Вертикальной Посадки», romanized: Mnogorazoviy Transportniy Korabl' Vertikal'noy Posadki, lit. 'Reusable Vertical Landing Transport Ship'), a 34-meter-long lifting body spaceplane launched on top of a stack of kerosene-fueled strap on boosters; [12] and the OS-120 (Russian : ОС-120, «Орбитальный Самолет», romanized: Orbital'niy Samolet, lit. 'Orbital Spaceplane–120 tons'), a close copy of the US Space Shuttle based on US Space Shuttle documentation and designs obtained through the VPK and KGB. [4] The OS-120 was a delta-winged spaceplane based heavily on the US Space Shuttle design, equipped with three liquid hydrogen engines, strapped to a detachable external tank and four liquid fuel boosters (NPO Energiya even considered the use of solid propellant rocket boosters, further imitating the US Shuttle's configuration). [13]

A compromise between these two proposals was achieved by NPO Energiya in January 1976 with the OK-92 (Russian : ОК-92, «Орбитальный Корабль», romanized: Orbital'niy Korabl', lit. 'Orbital Ship–92 tons'), a delta-winged orbiter equipped with two Soloviev D-30 turbofan jet engines for autonomous atmospheric flight, launched to space from a rocket stack made of a core stage with three cryogenic engines, and four kerosene-fueled boosters, each with four engines. [14] By 1978, the OK-92 design was further refined, with its final configuration completed in June 1979. [15]

Early artist's concept of a Soviet space shuttle approaching a manned space complex. "Buran" approaching a manned space complex.JPEG
Early artist's concept of a Soviet space shuttle approaching a manned space complex.

Soviet engineers were initially reluctant to implement a spacecraft design with so many similarities to the US Space Shuttle. Although it has been commented that wind tunnel testing showed that NASA's design was already ideal, [16] the shape requirements were mandated by its potential military capabilities to transport large payloads to low Earth orbit, themselves a counterpart to the Pentagon's initially projected missions for the Shuttle. [17] Even though the Molniya Scientific Production Association proposed its Spiral programme design [18] (halted 13 years earlier), it was rejected as being altogether dissimilar from the American shuttle design.

The construction of the shuttles began in 1980, and by 1984 the first full-scale Buran was rolled out. The first suborbital test flight of a scale-model (BOR-5) took place as early as July 1983. As the project progressed, five additional scale-model flights were performed. A test vehicle was constructed with four jet engines mounted at the rear; this vehicle is usually referred to as OK-GLI, or as the "Buran aerodynamic analogue". The jets were used to take off from a normal landing strip, and once it reached a designated point, the engines were cut and OK-GLI glided back to land. This provided invaluable information about the handling characteristics of the Buran design, and significantly differed from the carrier plane/air drop method used by the United States and the Enterprise test craft. Twenty-four test flights of OK-GLI were performed by the Gromov Flight Research Institute test pilots and researchers after which the shuttle was "worn out". The developers considered using a couple of Mil Mi-26 helicopters to "bundle" lift the Buran, but test flights with a mock-up showed how risky and impractical that was. [19] The VM-T ferried components [20] and the Antonov An-225 Mriya (the heaviest airplane ever) was designed and used to ferry the shuttle. [21] [22]

The flight and ground-testing software also required research. In 1983 the Buran developers estimated that the software development would require several thousand programmers if done with their existing methodology (in assembly language), and they appealed to Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics for assistance. It was decided to develop a new high-level "problem-oriented" programming language. Researchers at Keldysh developed two languages: PROL2 (used for real-time programming of onboard systems) and DIPOL (used for the ground-based test systems), as well as the development and debugging environment SAPO PROLOGUE. [23] There was also an operating system known as Prolog Manager. [24] Work on these languages continued beyond the end of the Buran programme, with PROL2 being extended into SIPROL, [25] and eventually all three languages developed into DRAKON [ citation needed ] which is still in use in the Russian space industry. A declassified May 1990 CIA report citing open-source intelligence material states that the software for the Buran spacecraft was written in "the French-developed programming language known as Prolog", [26] possibly due to confusion with the name PROLOGUE.

Flight crew preparation

Igor Petrovich Volk, cosmonaut and test pilot of the OK-GLI. Igor Volk 2.jpg
Igor Petrovich Volk, cosmonaut and test pilot of the OK-GLI.

Until the end of the Soviet Union in 1991, seven cosmonauts were allocated to the Buran programme and trained on the OK-GLI ("Buran aerodynamic analogue") test vehicle. All had experience as test pilots. They were: Ivan Ivanovich Bachurin, Alexei Sergeyevich Borodai, Anatoli Semyonovich Levchenko, Aleksandr Vladimirovich Shchukin, Rimantas Antanas Stankevičius, Igor Petrovich Volk, and Viktor Vasiliyevich Zabolotsky.

A rule, set in place for cosmonauts after the failed Soyuz 25 mission of 1977, stipulated that all Soviet space missions must contain at least one crew member who has been to space before. In 1982, it was decided that all Buran commanders and their back-ups would occupy the third seat on a Soyuz mission, prior to their Buran spaceflight. Several people had been selected to potentially be in the first Buran crew. By 1985, it was decided that at least one of the two crew members would be a test pilot trained at the Gromov Flight Research Institute (known as "LII"), and potential crew lists were drawn up. Only two potential Buran crew members reached space: Igor Volk, who flew in Soyuz T-12 to the space station Salyut 7, and Anatoli Levchenko who visited Mir, launching with Soyuz TM-4 and landing with Soyuz TM-3. Both of these spaceflights lasted about a week. [8]

Levchenko died of a brain tumour the year after his orbital flight, Bachurin left the cosmonaut corps because of medical reasons, Shchukin was assigned to the back-up crew of Soyuz TM-4 and later died in a plane crash, Stankevičius was also killed in a plane crash, while Borodai and Zabolotsky remained unassigned to a Soyuz flight until the Buran programme ended.

Spaceflight of I. P. Volk

The crew of Soyuz T-12 (Vladimir Dzhanibekov, Svetlana Savitskaya, and Igor Volk) on a stamp issued in 1985 1985 CPA 5654.jpg
The crew of Soyuz T-12 (Vladimir Dzhanibekov, Svetlana Savitskaya, and Igor Volk) on a stamp issued in 1985

Igor Volk was planned to be the commander of the first crewed Buran flight. There were two purposes of the Soyuz T-12 mission, one of which was to give Volk spaceflight experience. The other purpose, seen as the more important factor, was to beat the United States and have the first spacewalk by a woman. [8] At the time of the Soyuz T-12 mission the Buran programme was still a state secret. The appearance of Volk as a crew member caused some, including the British Interplanetary Society magazine Spaceflight , to ask why a test pilot was occupying a Soyuz seat usually reserved for researchers or foreign cosmonauts. [27]

Spaceflight of A. S. Levchenko

Anatoli Levchenko was planned to be the back-up commander of the first crewed Buran flight, and in March 1987 he began extensive training for his Soyuz spaceflight. [8] In December 1987, he occupied the third seat aboard Soyuz TM-4 to Mir, and returned to Earth about a week later on Soyuz TM-3. His mission is sometimes called Mir LII-1, after the Gromov Flight Research Institute shorthand. [28] When Levchenko died the following year, it left the back-up crew of the first Buran mission again without spaceflight experience. A Soyuz spaceflight for another potential back-up commander was sought by the Gromov Flight Research Institute, but never occurred. [8]

Ground facilities

Early illustration of a Buran launch at Baikonur "Buran" launch at Baikonur.JPEG
Early illustration of a Buran launch at Baikonur

Maintenance, launches and landings of the Buran-class orbiters were to take place at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in the Kazakh SSR. Several facilities at Baikonur were adapted or newly built for these purposes:

Missions

Atmospheric test flights

OK-GLI Buran aerodynamic analogue VKK Buran AN0077204.jpg
OK-GLI Buran aerodynamic analogue

An aerodynamic testbed, OK-GLI, was constructed in 1984 to test the in-flight properties of the Buran design. Unlike the American prototype Space Shuttle Enterprise, OK-GLI had four AL-31 turbofan engines fitted, meaning it was able to fly under its own power.

Orbital flight of Buran in 1988

Following a series of atmospheric test flights using the jet-powered OK-GLI prototype, the first operational spacecraft (Buran, orbiter 1K) flew one uncrewed test mission. [34]

At 03:00  UTC on 15 November 1988, Buran and the Energia carrier rocket lifted off from pad 110/37 in Baikonur. [34] The life support system was not installed for the flight and no data was displayed on the CRT displays in the Command Compartment. [35]

NoLaunch DateMissionShuttleCrewDurationLanding SiteNotesSources
115 November 1988
03:00:02 UTC
06:00:02 MSK
1K1 Buran 03h 25m 22s Baikonur
  • Only flight of Buran
  • Only uncrewed flight of Space Shuttle type vehicle
[36] [37] [38] [39]

The shuttle orbited the Earth twice, travelling 83,707 kilometres (52,013 mi) in 3 hours and 25 minutes (0.14 flight days). [40] On its return, it performed an automated landing on the shuttle runway (Site 251) at Baikonur Cosmodrome. [41]

Planned flights

Planned Ptichka mission to Mir space station "Buran" docked to "Mir" space station.jpg
Planned Ptichka mission to Mir space station

The planned flights for the shuttles in 1989, before the downsizing of the project and eventual cancellation, were: [42]

  • 1991 — Orbiter 2K uncrewed first flight, duration 1–2 days.
  • 1992 — Orbiter 2K uncrewed second flight, duration 7–8 days. Orbital manoeuvres and space station approach test.
  • 1993 — Buran (1K) uncrewed second flight, duration 15–20 days.
  • 1994 — Orbiter 3K first crewed space test flight, duration of 24 hours. Craft equipped with life-support system and with two ejection seats. Crew would consist of two cosmonauts with Igor Volk as commander, and a flight engineer.
  • 1994-1995 - Second, third, fourth and fifth crewed orbital test flights.

The planned uncrewed second flight of orbiter 2K was changed in 1991 to the following:

  • December 1991 — Orbiter 2K uncrewed second flight, with a duration of 7–8 days. Orbital maneuvers and space station approach test:
    • automatic docking with Mir's Kristall module
    • crew transfer from Mir to the orbiter, with testing of some of its systems in the course of twenty-four hours, including the remote manipulator
    • undocking and autonomous flight in orbit
    • docking of the crewed Soyuz TM-101 with orbiter 2K
    • crew transfer from the Soyuz to the orbiter and onboard work in the course of twenty-four hours
    • automatic undocking and landing

Cancellation of the programme 1993

Buran family, showing test articles and orbiters in different completion stages. Buran family.png
Buran family, showing test articles and orbiters in different completion stages.

After the first flight of a Buran shuttle, the project was suspended due to lack of funds and the political situation in the Soviet Union. The two subsequent orbiters, which were due in 1990 (Orbiter 2K) and 1992 (Orbiter 3K) were never completed with other articles being scrapped (see next section).

The project was officially terminated on 30 June 1993, by President Boris Yeltsin. At the time of its cancellation, 20 billion roubles had been spent on the Buran programme. [43] Commenting on the discontinuation of the programme in his interview to New Scientist , Russian cosmonaut Oleg Kotov described the project's end:

"We had no civilian tasks for Buran and the military ones were no longer needed." [44]

The programme was designed to boost national pride, carry out research, and meet technological objectives similar to those of the U.S. Space Shuttle program, including resupply of the Mir space station, which was launched in 1986 and remained in service until 2001. When Mir was finally visited by a spaceplane, the visitor was a Space Shuttle orbiter, not a Buran-class orbiter.

The Buran SO, a docking module that was to be used for rendezvous with the Mir space station, was refitted for use with the U.S. Space Shuttles during the Shuttle–Mir missions. [45]

The cost of a Buran launch carrying a 20-ton payload was estimated at 270 million roubles, vs 5.5 million roubles on the Proton rocket. [46]

Baikonur hangar collapse

On 12 May 2002, a hangar roof at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan collapsed because of a structural failure due to poor maintenance. The collapse killed eight workers and destroyed one of the Buran-class orbiters (Buran, orbiter 1K), which flew the test flight in 1988, as well as a mock-up of an Energia booster rocket. It was not clear to outsiders at the time which orbiter was destroyed and the BBC reported that it was just "a model" of the orbiter. [47] It occurred at the MIK RN/MIK 112 building at Site 112 of the Baikonur Cosmodrome, 14 years after the only Buran flight. Work on the roof had begun for a maintenance project, whose equipment is thought to have contributed to the collapse, together with heavy rainfall in the days preceding the collapse. [8] [48]

List of vehicles

Five orbiters were planned to be built (designated 1K-5K, K stands for Корабль, 'craft, flying article'), with hull numbering starting with 1 or 2 (e.g. 1.01), two originally ordered in 1970s and three ("second series") additionally ordered in 1983.[ citation needed ]

For research and testing purposes, several test articles were produced, designated 1M-8M (M stands for Макет, 'mock-up'), with hull numbering starting with 0 (e.g. 0.02). The programme prefix OK stands for Орбитальный Корабль, 'Orbital Vehicle' and carries the GRAU index number 11F35.

By 1991 two operational vehicles were delivered to Baikonur, three others were under construction at the Tushino Machine-Building Plant (TMZ) near Moscow.

Most of the geo-locations below show the orbiter bodies on the ground; in some cases Google Earth's History facility is required to see the orbiter within the dates specified. [49] [50]

NameFunctionLocationImageGeo-locationApproximate datesNotes
Flight orbiters
Buran
1K
1.01
First flight article, first spaceplane series Baikonur Cosmodrome Site 110/37 (L) at Baikonur 1988
Antonov An-225 with Buran at Le Bourget 1989 Manteufel.jpg 1989
45°57′53″N63°18′18″E / 45.96486°N 63.30496°E / 45.96486; 63.30496 (Buran 1K 1.01 (15 November 1988)) Spaceplane not visible; no available satellite photos15 November 1988Built in 1986, only flightworthy orbiter. Launched on an uncrewed, remote controlled flight; two orbits and landing (with heavy crosswinds and a self-initiated approach direction change) at Yubileiniy (Jubilee) Airport, Baikonur.
MIK building, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan 2002 45°55′39″N63°17′51″E / 45.92750°N 63.29761°E / 45.92750; 63.29761 (Buran 1K 1.01 (1988 to 2002)) Spaceplane not visible; shadows1988 to 2002Housed in MIK building in area 112, Baikonur with an Energia booster mockup and other Energia hardware, destroyed in a roof collapse on 12 May 2002, which killed eight workers.
2K

Ptichka
1.02

Second flight article, first series, 95–97% completeMIK building, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan 45°55′42″N63°17′53″E / 45.92836°N 63.29809°E / 45.92836; 63.29809 (Ptichka 2K 1.02 (1988 to 1995)) Shuttle not visible, in building1988 to 1995Built in 1988, housed adjacent to Buran.
MZK building 80, area 112a, Baikonur 2015
Izdelie 1.02, foto 2 .jpg 2020
45°56′26″N63°19′06″E / 45.94046°N 63.31841°E / 45.94046; 63.31841 (Ptichka 2K 1.02 (1995 to present)) Spaceplane not visible; in building1995 to presentOften erroneously referred to as "Ptichka" or "Burya". [51] Moved to the MZK in August 1995. [52] Reportedly property of Russian-Kazakh company Aelita since 2005. [53]
3K

Baikal
2.01

First flight article, second series, 30–50% completeInside Tushino Plant, Moscow, Russia1991 to 2006Built 1991
Car park on Kimki Reservoir, near plant 2007–2011 55°50′29″N37°27′59″E / 55.84136°N 37.46625°E / 55.84136; 37.46625 (3K 2.01 (2006 to 2011)) ; use history2006 to 2011Moved outdoors
Zhukovsky Airport, near Moscow, Russia Buran 2.01 2011 in Gromov Flight Research Institute.jpg 2011on 15 August 2011 55°34′17″N38°08′35″E / 55.57125°N 38.143°E / 55.57125; 38.143 (3K 2.01 (2011 to present)) ; use history2011 to presentAn exhibit in the MAKS-2011 and later air shows. Zhukovsky International Airport is the site of the Gromov Flight Research Institute, and has become a large outdoor flight museum. Other sightings:
on 15 March 2012: 55°33′56″N38°08′42″E / 55.56565°N 38.14491°E / 55.56565; 38.14491 ,
on 31 July 2012 and 8 May 2013 55°33′47″N38°08′50″E / 55.56309°N 38.14714°E / 55.56309; 38.14714 ,
on 4 June and 29 July 2014 55°33′06″N38°08′41″E / 55.55179°N 38.14463°E / 55.55179; 38.14463 ,
on 11 September 2016 through 2020 55°34′17″N38°08′35″E / 55.57125°N 38.143°E / 55.57125; 38.143 . As of December, 2021, it has been reportedly bought by Vadim Zadorozhny, in order to be restored and displayed in a museum near Moscow [54]
4K
2.02
Second flight article, second series, 10–20% completeTushino plant, Moscow, Russia 1988 to presentBuild started 1988, Only forward fuselage with crew cabin was completed by the time its construction was cancelled. The right wing with landing gear produced for this orbiter was later used for OK-TVA. [55] Some pieces of 2.02, like heat tiles, have found their way onto eBay. [56]
5K
2.03
Third flight article, second series, very small amount assembledScattered1988 to presentDisassembled by 1995. All parts have been scattered and are unidentifiable.
Test articles
OK-M
OK-ML-1
BTS-001
1M
0.01
Airframe and shake test bed articleOutdoor pad, area 112, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan 45°55′11″N63°18′36″E / 45.91963°N 63.30996°E / 45.91963; 63.30996 (OK-M (1988 to January 2007)) ; use history1988 to January 2007Built in 1982, deteriorated considerably outdoors on pad
Gagarin Museum, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan Buran baikonur.jpg 2007 45°54′35″N63°19′04″E / 45.90963°N 63.31789°E / 45.90963; 63.31789 (OK-M (January 2007 to present)) January 2007 to presentRefurbished in 2007, now on outdoor display
OK-GLI
OK-ML-2
BTS-002
2M
0.02
Atmospheric test article, two extra jet engines in rear to facilitate take-offRamenskoye Airport, Moscow 55°33′47″N38°08′50″E / 55.5631°N 38.14716°E / 55.5631; 38.14716 (OK-GLI (1999)) ; no history available this far back1999Built in 1984, used in 25 test flights. On display at MAKS-1999, Russia's most prestigious airshow.
Darling Island, Sydney harbour, Australia 2000
Buran Space Shuttle (5449959291).jpg 2002
33°51′50″S151°11′48″E / 33.86392°S 151.19662°E / -33.86392; 151.19662 (OK-GLI (2000-2002)) ; use history to see shelter, shuttle not visibleFebruary 2000 to September 2000; afterwards stored on the site until about Oct 2002Sold and sent in February 2000 to the Sydney, Australia 2000 Olympic Games. Displayed inside a light structure, stored outdoors there afterwards.
Manama harbor, Bahrain 26°11′54″N50°36′09″E / 26.19826°N 50.60243°E / 26.19826; 50.60243 (OK-GLI (July 2004 to 2007)) ; use historyJuly 2004 to 2007Stored outdoors in Bahrain while the ownership of the spaceplane was legally contested.
Technik Museum, Speyer, Germany [57] OK-GLI Technik Museum Speyer 2008 12.JPG 2008 49°18′43″N8°26′47″E / 49.31185°N 8.44628°E / 49.31185; 8.44628 (OK-GLI (2008 to present)) ; shuttle not visible, in building2008 to presentPurchased from Roscosmos State Corporation when it won the legal battle, displayed indoors.
OK-KS
3M
0.03
Electrical test articleCheckout and Test Building (KIS), RKK Energia Plant, Korolev, Russia 55°55′17″N37°47′57″E / 55.92132°N 37.79929°E / 55.92132; 37.79929 (OK-KS (2006 to 15 October 2012)) ; not visible, in building. This location shows a half-scale memorial of Energia and the Buran, perhaps meant to be replaced.2006 to 15 October 2012Built in 1982, stored inside
Grounds of the RKK Energia plant 55°55′01″N37°47′58″E / 55.91685°N 37.79937°E / 55.91685; 37.79937 (OK-KS (15 October 2012 to June 2017)) 15 October 2012 to June 2017Stored outside by 15 October 2012, intended to be placed on permanent display. [58]
Sirius Science Center, Sochi, Krasnodar Krai, Russia Buran BTS-003 Sochi 27102018.jpg 2018 43°24′52″N39°56′57″E / 43.414442°N 39.949115°E / 43.414442; 39.949115 (OK-KS (June 2017 to current)) June 2017 to currentOn permanent outdoor display at the Sirius Science Center in Sochi, Russia. [59] [60]
OK-MT
4M
0.04
Engineering mockupMZK building, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan 2014
Izdelie 0.15.jpg 2020
45°56′26″N63°19′06″E / 45.94046°N 63.31841°E / 45.94046; 63.31841 (OK-MT) ; vehicle not visible, in building1988 to presentBuilt in 1983. Moved to the MZK in August 1995. [52]
5M
0.05
Environmental test parts from forward fuselageUnknown1988 to presentDestroyed, parts used for OK-TVA. [61]
OK-TVI
6M
0.06
Environmental test articleNIIKhimMash rocket test area, near Moscow, Russia 1988 to present
OK-TVA
7M
0.15
Structural test articleGorky Park, Moscow, Russia Moscow Gorky Park View from Frunzenskaya Embankment 05.jpg 2010 55°43′44″N37°35′49″E / 55.72876°N 37.59688°E / 55.72876; 37.59688 (OK-TVA (1995 to July 2014)) ; use history1995 to July 2014Served as an attraction, a small restaurant, and bicycle storage, as part of the now-defunct amusement park at that site.
Outside Pavilion 20 about 250 meters south of the Vostok rocket, VDNKh/VVT (All-Russia Exhibition Center) Buran OK-TVA VDNKh.JPG 2014 55°49′56″N37°37′22″E / 55.83219°N 37.62291°E / 55.83219; 37.62291 (OK-TVA (July 2014 to present)) ; use historyJuly 2014 to presentMoved to VDNKh on 5 July 2014, assembled by 21 July. [62] [63] The shuttle acquisition is part of the VDNKh refurbishment.
8M
0.08
Components used for static thermal and vacuum testsOutdoor display at Clinical Hospital No. 83 FMBA on Orekhovy Boulevard in Moscow Buran 8M front view.JPG 2012 55°37′05″N37°45′52″E / 55.618°N 37.76448°E / 55.618; 37.76448 (8M (from 24 April 2011 to present)) from 24 April 2011 to present
UnnamedWooden wind tunnel model, 1/3 scaleRamenskoye Airport, near Moscow, Russia, photographed in 2013 It no longer exists. Wind tunnel wooden model 1 3 scale of Buran is at the far corner of Zhukovsky airfield. (11137924623).jpg 2013 [64] up to 2013Has been destroyed in or after 2013. Photographed at Zhukovsky International Airport by Aleksander Makin.
NameFunctionImageConstruction dateCurrent status [65]
BOR-4 Sub-scale model of the Spiral space plane BOR-4S.jpg 1982–19841:2 scale model of Spiral space plane. 5 launches. NPO Molniya, Moscow.
BOR-5 ("Kosmos")Suborbital test of 1/8 scale model of Buran Bor-(5).jpg 1983–19885 launches, none were reflown but at least 4 were recovered. NPO Molniya, Moscow.
Wind tunnel modelsScales from 1:3 to 1:55085 models built; see unnamed test article in table above.
Gas dynamics modelsScales from 1:15 to 1:2700

Revival possibilities

Over time, several scientists looked into trying to revive the Buran programme, especially after the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster. [66]

The 2003 grounding of the U.S. Space Shuttles caused many to wonder whether the Energia launcher or Buran shuttle could be brought back into service. [67] By then, however, all of the equipment for both (including the vehicles themselves) had fallen into disrepair or been repurposed after falling into disuse with the collapse of the Soviet Union.

In 2010 the director of Moscow's Central Machine Building Institute said the Buran programme would be reviewed in the hope of restarting a similar crewed spacecraft design, with rocket test launches as soon as 2015. [68] Russia also continues work on the PPTS but has abandoned the Kliper program, due to differences in vision with its European partners. [69]

Due to the 2011 retirement of the American Space Shuttle and the need for STS-type craft in the meantime to complete the International Space Station, some American and Russian scientists had been mulling over plans to possibly revive the already-existing Buran shuttles in the Buran programme rather than spend money on an entirely new craft and wait for it to be fully developed [66] [67] but the plans did not come to fruition.

On the 25th anniversary of the Buran flight in November 2013, Oleg Ostapenko, the new head of Roscosmos, the Russian Federal Space Agency, proposed that a new heavy-lift launch vehicle be built for the Russian space programme. The rocket would be intended to place a payload of 100 tonnes (220,000 lb) in a baseline low Earth orbit and is projected to be based on the Angara launch vehicle technology. [70]

Vehicles

Energia launch vehicle

Energia perspective free render with multiple angles and human (1.76 m) for scale. Energia Render 3.png
Energia perspective free render with multiple angles and human (1.76 m) for scale.

Energia (Russian: Энергия, romanized: Energiya, lit. 'Energy'; GRAU 11K25) was a 1980s super-heavy lift launch vehicle. It was designed by NPO Energia of the Soviet Union as part of the Buran program for a variety of payloads including the Buran spacecraft. Control system main developer enterprise was the Khartron NPO "Electropribor". [71] [72] The Energia used four strap-on boosters each powered by a four-chamber RD-170 engine burning kerosene/LOX, and a central core stage with four single-chamber RD-0120 (11D122) engines fueled by liquid hydrogen/LOX. [73]

The launch vehicle had two functionally different operational variants: Energia-Polyus, the initial test configuration, in which the Polyus system was used as a final stage intended to put the payload into orbit, and Energia-Buran, [74] in which the Buran orbiter was the payload and the source of the orbit insertion impulse.

The launch vehicle had the capacity to place about 100 tonnes in Low Earth orbit, up to 20 tonnes to geostationary orbit and up to 32 tonnes by translunar trajectory into lunar orbit. [75]

The launch vehicle made just two flights before being discontinued. [76] [74] Since 2016, there have been attempts to revive the launch vehicle, reusing an updated version of its booster engine in the Soyuz-5 rocket.

Buran orbiter

Buran on a Soviet stamp, with an Energia rocket. The Soviet Union 1991 CPA 6300 stamp (14th standard issue of Soviet Union. 3rd issue. Space Exploration. 'Energia' rocket and 'Buran' spacecraft on launch pad) 1200dpi.jpg
Buran on a Soviet stamp, with an Energia rocket.
Buran (Russian: Буран, IPA: [bʊˈran] , lit.' blizzard '; GRAU index serial number: 11F35 1K, construction number: 1.01) was the first spaceplane to be produced as part of the Soviet/Russian Buran program. Buran completed one uncrewed spaceflight in 1988, and was destroyed in 2002 due to the collapse of its storage hangar. [77] The Buran-class orbiters used the expendable Energia rocket, a class of super heavy-lift launch vehicle. Besides describing the first operational Soviet/Russian shuttle orbiter, "Buran" was also the designation for the entire Soviet/Russian spaceplane project and its flight articles, which were known as "Buran-class orbiters".

Antonov An-225 Mriya

The An-225 in its 2009-2022 livery Antonov An-225 Beltyukov-1.jpg
The An-225 in its 2009–2022 livery


The Antonov An-225 Mriya (Ukrainian: Антонов Ан-225 Мрія, lit. 'dream' or 'inspiration'; NATO reporting name: Cossack) was a strategic airlift cargo aircraft designed and produced by the Antonov Design Bureau in the Soviet Union.

It was originally developed during the 1980s as an enlarged derivative of the Antonov An-124 airlifter for transporting Buran spacecraft. On 21 December 1988, the An-225 performed its maiden flight; only one aircraft was ever completed, although a second airframe with a slightly different configuration was partially built. After a brief period of use in the Soviet space programme, the aircraft was mothballed during the early 1990s. Towards the turn of the century, it was decided to refurbish the An-225 and reintroduce it for commercial operations, carrying oversized payloads for the operator Antonov Airlines. Multiple announcements were made regarding the potential completion of the second airframe, though its construction largely remained on hold due to a lack of funding. By 2009, it had reportedly been brought up to 60–70% completion.

With a maximum takeoff weight of 640 tonnes (705 short tons), the An-225 held several records, including heaviest aircraft ever built and largest wingspan of any operational aircraft. It was commonly used to transport objects once thought impossible to move by air, such as 130-ton generators, wind turbine blades, and diesel locomotives. Additionally, both Chinese and Russian officials had announced separate plans to adapt the An-225 for use in their respective space programmes. The Mriya routinely attracted a high degree of public interest, attaining a global following due to its size and its uniqueness.

The only completed An-225 was destroyed in the Battle of Antonov Airport in 2022 during the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced plans to complete the second An-225 to replace the destroyed aircraft.

Energia liquid rocket booster

Zenit-2 rocket (Baikonur, 10 December 2001) Zenit-2 rocket ready for launch.jpg
Zenit-2 rocket (Baikonur, 10 December 2001)

Zenit (Ukrainian: Зеніт, Russian: Зени́т; meaning Zenith) was a family of space launch vehicles designed by the Yuzhnoye Design Bureau in Dnipro, Ukraine, which was then part of the Soviet Union. Zenit was originally built in the 1980s for two purposes: as a liquid rocket booster for the Energia rocket and, equipped with a second stage, as a stand-alone middle-weight launcher with a payload greater than the 7 tonnes of the Soyuz but smaller than the 20 tonnes payload of the Proton. The last rocket family developed in the USSR, the Zenit was intended as an eventual replacement for the dated Soyuz and Proton families, and it would employ propellants which were safer and less toxic than the Proton's nitrogen tetroxide/UDMH mix. Zenit was planned to take over crewed spaceship launches from Soyuz, but these plans were abandoned after the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991.

Many of components of the Zenit rockets were produced in Russia. The Ukrainian space industry was highly integrated with that of Russia due to its Soviet heritage, but that cooperation was interrupted by the Russo-Ukrainian War beginning in 2014, which has effectively led to a hiatus in the Zenit program. [78] The subsequent Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 saw damage to its manufacturing facilities due to Russian missile strikes, and what survived those strikes pivoted to producing military weapons. [79]

Zenit-3SL was launched by the Sea Launch consortium's floating launch platform in the Pacific Ocean and Zenit-2 was launched from Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan. RD-171M engines of the Zenit's first and second stages as well as the upper stage of the Zenit-3SL rocket were supplied by Russia. An improved Zenit-3SLB rocket was used for commercial launches from Baikonur Cosmodrome beginning in April 2008, marketed as Land Launch. [80]

Zenit-3SL was launched 36 times with 32 successes, one partial success, and three failures. The first failure, the launch of a Hughes-built communications satellite owned by ICO Global Communications, occurred during the second commercial launch on March 12, 2000, and was blamed on a software error that failed to close a valve in the second stage of the rocket. The second failure occurred on January 30, 2007, when the rocket exploded on the Odyssey launch platform, seconds after engine ignition. The NSS-8 communication satellite on board was destroyed. [81]

On September 24, 2011 Zenit-3SL launched successfully from the Odyssey launch platform under a renewed Sea Launch project with RSC Energia as the majority stakeholder. The rocket delivered the European communication satellite Atlantic Bird 7 to its planned orbit. On February 1, 2013, another Zenit-3SL failed while launching the Intelsat 27 satellite. [82]

Energia-Buran and the US Space Shuttle

Comparison between Soyuz, Space Shuttle, and Energia-Buran Soyuz, Space Shuttle, Buran comparison.svg
Comparison between Soyuz, Space Shuttle, and Energia-Buran
Comparison to Space Shuttle Gateway to space 2016, Budapest, Buran - Russian reusable space plane (model) 2.jpg
Comparison to Space Shuttle

Comparison to NASA's Space Shuttle

Because Buran's debut followed that of Space Shuttle Columbia 's, and because there were striking visual similarities between the two shuttle systems—a state of affairs which recalled the similarity between the Tupolev Tu-144 and Concorde supersonic airliners—many speculated that Cold War espionage played a role in the development of the Soviet shuttle. Despite remarkable external similarities, many key differences existed, which suggests that, had espionage been a factor in Buran's development, it would likely have been in the form of external photography or early airframe designs. NASA Administrator James C. Fletcher stated that Buran was based on a rejected NASA design. [83] See the § Program development section above.

Key differences between Energia-Buran system and NASA's Space Shuttle

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energia (rocket)</span> Soviet launch vehicle

Energia was a 1980s super-heavy lift launch vehicle. It was designed by NPO Energia of the Soviet Union as part of the Buran program for a variety of payloads including the Buran spacecraft. Control system main developer enterprise was the Khartron NPO "Electropribor". The Energia used four strap-on boosters each powered by a four-chamber RD-170 engine burning kerosene/LOX, and a central core stage with four single-chamber RD-0120 (11D122) engines fueled by liquid hydrogen/LOX.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spacecraft</span> Vehicle or machine designed to fly in space

A spacecraft is a vehicle that is designed to fly and operate in outer space. Spacecraft are used for a variety of purposes, including communications, Earth observation, meteorology, navigation, space colonization, planetary exploration, and transportation of humans and cargo. All spacecraft except single-stage-to-orbit vehicles cannot get into space on their own, and require a launch vehicle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proton (rocket family)</span> Soviet designed rocket family

Proton is an expendable launch system used for both commercial and Russian government space launches. The first Proton rocket was launched in 1965. Modern versions of the launch system are still in use as of 2023, making it one of the most successful heavy boosters in the history of spaceflight. The components of all Protons are manufactured in the Khrunichev State Research and Production Space Center factory in Moscow and Chemical Automatics Design Bureau in Voronezh, then transported to the Baikonur Cosmodrome, where they are assembled at Site 91 to form the launch vehicle. Following payload integration, the rocket is then brought to the launch pad horizontally by rail, and raised into vertical position for launch.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energia (corporation)</span> Russian spacecraft manufacturer

S.P. Korolev Rocket and Space Corporation "Energia" is a Russian manufacturer of spacecraft and space station components. Its name is derived from the Russian word for energy and is also named for Sergei Pavlovich Korolev, the first chief of its design bureau and the driving force behind early Soviet accomplishments in space exploration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Baikonur Cosmodrome</span> Spaceport in Kazakhstan leased to Russia

The Baikonur Cosmodrome is a spaceport operated by Russia within Kazakhstan. Located in the Kazakh city of Baikonur, it is the largest operational space launch facility in terms of area. All Russian crewed spaceflights are launched from Baikonur.

Human spaceflight programs have been conducted, started, or planned by multiple countries and companies. Until the 21st century, human spaceflight programs were sponsored exclusively by governments, through either the military or civilian space agencies. With the launch of the privately funded SpaceShipOne in 2004, a new category of human spaceflight programs – commercial human spaceflight – arrived. By the end of 2022, three countries and one private company (SpaceX) had successfully launched humans to Earth orbit, and two private companies had launched humans on a suborbital trajectory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reusable launch vehicle</span> Vehicles that can go to space and return

A reusable launch vehicle has parts that can be recovered and reflown, while carrying payloads from the surface to outer space. Rocket stages are the most common launch vehicle parts aimed for reuse. Smaller parts such as rocket engines and boosters can also be reused, though reusable spacecraft may be launched on top of an expendable launch vehicle. Reusable launch vehicles do not need to make these parts for each launch, therefore reducing its launch cost significantly. However, these benefits are diminished by the cost of recovery and refurbishment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spaceplane</span> Spacecraft capable of aerodynamic flight in atmosphere

A spaceplane is a vehicle that can fly and glide like an aircraft in Earth's atmosphere and maneuver like a spacecraft in outer space. To do so, spaceplanes must incorporate features of both aircraft and spacecraft. Orbital spaceplanes tend to be more similar to conventional spacecraft, while sub-orbital spaceplanes tend to be more similar to fixed-wing aircraft. All spaceplanes to date have been rocket-powered for takeoff and climb, but have then landed as unpowered gliders.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kliper</span> Proposed partly reusable crewed spacecraft concept by RSC Energia

Kliper was an early-2000s proposed partially-reusable crewed spacecraft concept by RSC Energia. Due to lack of funding from the ESA and RSA, the project was indefinitely postponed by 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zenit (rocket family)</span> Soviet (now Ukrainian) RP-1/LOX fueled rocket, for satellite launch

Zenit was a family of space launch vehicles designed by the Yuzhnoye Design Bureau in Dnipro, Ukraine, which was then part of the Soviet Union. Zenit was originally built in the 1980s for two purposes: as a liquid rocket booster for the Energia rocket and, equipped with a second stage, as a stand-alone middle-weight launcher with a payload greater than the 7 tonnes of the Soyuz but smaller than the 20 tonnes payload of the Proton. The last rocket family developed in the USSR, the Zenit was intended as an eventual replacement for the dated Soyuz and Proton families, and it would employ propellants which were safer and less toxic than the Proton's nitrogen tetroxide/UDMH mix. Zenit was planned to take over crewed spaceship launches from Soyuz, but these plans were abandoned after the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Soviet space program</span> Space exploration program conducted by the Soviet Union from 1951 to 1991

The Soviet space program was the state space program of the Soviet Union, active from 1951 until the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. Contrary to its American, European, and Chinese competitors, which had their programs run under single coordinating agencies, the Soviet space program was divided between several internally competing design bureaus led by Korolev, Kerimov, Keldysh, Yangel, Glushko, Chelomey, Makeyev, Chertok and Reshetnev. Several of these bureaus were subordinated to the Ministry of General Machine-Building. The Soviet space program served as an important marker of claims by the Soviet Union to its superpower status.

The Polyus spacecraft, also known as Polus, Skif-DM, GRAU index 17F19DM, was a prototype Soviet orbital weapons platform designed to destroy Strategic Defense Initiative satellites with a megawatt carbon-dioxide laser. It had a Functional Cargo Block derived from a TKS spacecraft to control its orbit and it could launch test targets to demonstrate the fire control system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Angara (rocket family)</span> Russian family of space launch vehicles

The Angara rocket family is a family of launch vehicles being developed by the Moscow-based Khrunichev State Research and Production Space Center. The launch vehicles are to put between 3,800 kg (8,400 lb) and 24,500 kg (54,000 lb) into low Earth orbit and are intended, along with Soyuz-2 variants, to replace several existing launch vehicles.

<i>Ptichka</i> Reusable launch vehicle

2K, often referred to as Ptichka, is the second Buran-class orbiter, produced as part of the Soviet/Russian Buran programme. Although 2K was the closest to being completed of any of the Buran-class orbiters, it was never finished. The program was officially cancelled in 1993, at which point the shuttle was 95-97% complete. The proposed official name for 2K was Burya.

<i>Buran</i> (spacecraft) Soviet winged orbital vehicle

Buran was the first spaceplane to be produced as part of the Soviet/Russian Buran program. Buran completed one uncrewed spaceflight in 1988, and was destroyed in 2002 due to the collapse of its storage hangar. The Buran-class orbiters used the expendable Energia rocket, a class of super heavy-lift launch vehicle. Besides describing the first operational Soviet/Russian shuttle orbiter, "Buran" was also the designation for the entire Soviet/Russian spaceplane project and its flight articles, which were known as "Buran-class orbiters".

The Zarya spacecraft was a secret Soviet project of the late 1980s aiming to design and build a large crewed vertical-takeoff, vertical-landing (VTVL) reusable space capsule, a much larger replacement for the Soyuz (spacecraft). The project was developed during the years of 1985–1989 by Energia corporation until it was shelved in 1989, "on the eve of the Soviet Union's collapse" due to lack of funding. The name of the project was later reused by the Zarya space station module which served as the first component of International Space Station in 1998.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Baikonur Cosmodrome Site 110</span>

Site 110 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome is a launch facility which was used by the N1 rocket during the late 1960s and early 1970s, and by the Energia rocket during the 1980s.

Super heavy-lift launch vehicle Launch vehicle capable of lifting more than 50 tonnes of payload into low earth orbit

A super heavy-lift launch vehicle is a rocket that can lift to low Earth orbit a "super heavy payload", which is defined as more than 50 metric tons (110,000 lb) by the United States and as more than 100 metric tons (220,000 lb) by Russia. It is the most capable launch vehicle classification by mass to orbit, exceeding that of the heavy-lift launch vehicle classification.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LKS (spacecraft)</span> Soviet spaceplane project

The LKS was a Soviet Union spaceplane project led by Vladimir Chelomey in response to the United States Space Shuttle. The LKS was smaller and cheaper than its American counterpart, but was ultimately discarded in favor of the larger Buran. Claiming that the Buran project was too big, heavy, and expensive for Russia to complete, Chelomey designed the LKS in 1979. He ordered the construction of a full-scale mock-up, as a way to further stimulate interest. The project was never fully sanctioned however, and in 1982, Chelomey was officially ordered by the Soviet government to stop any further development. In March 1983, Chelomey made yet another attempt to obtain permission to build the LKS to repel US Intercontinental ballistic missiles. This too proved futile. In 1991 the mock-up was destroyed, possibly by sabotage.

References

  1. Воздушно-космический Корабль [Air-Space Ship](PDF) (in Russian). Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 March 2006. Retrieved 2 June 2015.
  2. 1 2 Harvey, Brian (2007). The Rebirth of the Russian Space Programme: 50 Years After Sputnik, New Frontiers. Springer. p. 8. ISBN   978-0-38-771356-4. Archived from the original on 24 June 2016. Retrieved 9 February 2016.
  3. Russian shuttle dream dashed by Soviet crash. YouTube.com. Russia Today. 15 November 2007. Archived from the original on 11 December 2021. Retrieved 16 July 2009.
  4. 1 2 3 Windrem, Robert (4 November 1997). "How the Soviets stole a space shuttle". NBC News. Archived from the original on 30 March 2020. Retrieved 10 September 2013.
  5. Betz, Eric (4 December 2016). "Real-Life Rogue One: How the Soviets Stole NASA's Shuttle Plans". Discover Magazine.
  6. Chertok, Boris E. (May 2009). Siddiqi, Asif A. (ed.). Rockets and People, Volume 3: Hot Days of the Cold War (PDF). NASA History Series. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. ISBN   978-0-16-081733-5. SP-2005-4110. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 December 2017. Retrieved 12 July 2017.
  7. "Antonov An-225 Mryia (Cossack)". theAviationZone.com. 2003. Archived from the original on 25 September 2018. Retrieved 1 June 2015.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hendrickx & Vis 2007.
  9. 1 2 Gubanov, Boris (1998). Triumf i tragediya EnergiiТриумф и трагедия „Энергии“ [Triumph and Tragedy, Energiya]. Vol. 3. Publisher of the Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Economic Development. p. 33. ISBN   5-93320-002-6. Archived from the original on 1 November 2019. Retrieved 11 March 2021.
  10. Zak, Anatoly (20 November 2008). "Buran – the Soviet 'space shuttle'". BBC News. Archived from the original on 30 March 2020. Retrieved 7 December 2008.
  11. Hendrickx & Vis 2007, p. 62.
  12. Hendrickx & Vis 2007, p. 71.
  13. Hendrickx & Vis 2007, p. 73.
  14. Hendrickx & Vis 2007, p. 76.
  15. Hendrickx & Vis 2007, p. 82.
  16. Sparrow, Giles (2009). Spaceflight: The Complete Story From Sputnik to Shuttle—and Beyond. DK Publishers. p. 215. ISBN   9780756656416.
  17. Hendrickx & Vis 2007, p. 83.
  18. "Аппараты БОР". www.buran.ru. Archived from the original on 13 July 2020. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
  19. Fedotov, V. A. "BURAN Orbital Spaceship Airframe Creation". Buran-Energia.com. Archived from the original on 26 November 2012. Retrieved 22 January 2013.
  20. Petrovitch, Vassili. "VM-T Atlant: Description". Buran-Energia.com. Archived from the original on 25 January 2013. Retrieved 22 January 2013.
  21. Goebel, Greg. "The Antonov Giants: An-22, An-124, & An-225 – Antonov An-225 Mriya ("Cossack")". Airvectors.net. Archived from the original on 5 December 2012. Retrieved 21 August 2012.
  22. Goebel, Greg. "Postscript: The Other Shuttles – The Soviet Buran shuttle programme". Vectorsite.net. Archived from the original on 11 December 2011. Retrieved 21 August 2012.
  23. "Системное и прикладное программирование" [System and application programming]. 50th Anniversary of Institute for Applied Mathematics. Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics. 2004. Archived from the original on 14 September 2013. Retrieved 24 March 2015.
  24. "Отдел программных комплексов" [Department of software systems]. Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics. Archived from the original on 5 September 2011. Retrieved 26 March 2015.
  25. Kryukov, V. & Petrenko, A. (1996). Интегрированный подход к разработке крупных программных систем управления реального времени [An integrated approach to the development of large software systems, real-time control]. Индустрия программирования [Software industry]. Moscow. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 25 March 2015.
  26. "Soviet Software Productivity: Isolated Gains in an Uphill Battle" (PDF). Central Intelligence Agency. May 1990. p. 7. SW 90-10029X. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 August 2016. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  27. Hendrickx & Vis 2007, p. 526.
  28. Wade, Mark. "Mir LII-1". Encyclopedia Astronautica . Archived from the original on 30 November 2010. Retrieved 15 November 2010.
  29. Zak, Anatoly (7 April 2013). "Centers: Baikonur: Energia-Buran facilities: Site 112". RussianSpaceWeb.com. Archived from the original on 6 July 2015. Retrieved 2 August 2016.
  30. Petrovitch, Vassili. "End of an adventure". Buran-Energia.com. Archived from the original on 5 September 2017. Retrieved 16 August 2020.
  31. Zak, Anatoly (7 April 2013). "Centers: Baikonur: Energia-Buran facilities: Site 251". RussianSpaceWeb.com. Archived from the original on 25 February 2015. Retrieved 2 August 2016.
  32. "UAON". OurAirports. Archived from the original on 17 August 2016. Retrieved 16 August 2020.
  33. Zak, Anatoly (28 October 2009). "Centers: Baikonur: Energia-Buran facilities: Site 254". RussianSpaceWeb.com. Archived from the original on 9 August 2015. Retrieved 2 August 2016.
  34. 1 2 Hendrickx & Vis 2007, p. 349.
  35. "Shuttle Buran". NASA.gov. 12 November 1997. Archived from the original on 4 August 2006.
  36. Barringer, Felicity (16 November 1988). "Soviet Space Shuttle Orbits and Returns In Unmanned Debut". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 19 December 2013. Retrieved 23 November 2013.
  37. R. S. (17 November 1988). "Soviet shuttle". The Christian Science Monitor . Archived from the original on 3 October 2015. Retrieved 15 January 2013.
  38. "Russia starts ambitious super-heavy space rocket project". Space Daily. 19 November 2013. Archived from the original on 6 October 2014. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
  39. "Циклограмма полета орбитального корабля "Буран" 15 ноября 1988 г." Buran.ru (in Russian). Archived from the original on 30 April 2020. Retrieved 15 August 2020.
  40. Hendrickx & Vis 2007, p. 356.
  41. Chertok, Boris E. (January 2005). Siddiqi, Asif A. (ed.). Rockets and People, Volume 1 (PDF). NASA History Series. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. p. 179. ASIN   B0075GLYQG. SP-2005-4110. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 March 2020. Retrieved 16 August 2020.
  42. Lukashevich, Vadim. Экипажи "Бурана": Несбывшиеся планы [The Crews of "Buran": Unfulfilled Plans]. Buran.ru (in Russian). Archived from the original on 17 July 2006. Retrieved 5 August 2006.
  43. Wade, Mark. "Yeltsin cancels Buran project". Encyclopedia Astronautica . Archived from the original on 30 June 2006. Retrieved 2 July 2006.
  44. Paul Marks (7 July 2011). "Cosmonaut: Soviet space shuttle was safer than NASA's". Archived from the original on 20 August 2011. Retrieved 25 August 2017.
  45. Wade, Mark. "Mir-Shuttle Docking Module". Encyclopedia Astronautica . Archived from the original on 8 January 2010. Retrieved 16 July 2009.
  46. "Buran reusable shuttle". www.russianspaceweb.com. Archived from the original on 15 February 2015. Retrieved 1 June 2015.
  47. Whitehouse, David (13 May 2002). "Russia's space dreams abandoned". BBC News. Archived from the original on 21 November 2008. Retrieved 14 November 2007.
  48. Hendrickx & Vis 2007, p. 388.
  49. Petrovitch, Vasili. "Buran-Energia". Archived from the original on 5 September 2017. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  50. Zak, Anatoliy. "Buran". Archived from the original on 15 February 2015. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  51. Hendrickx & Vis 2007, p. 87.
  52. 1 2 "Перегруз Бурана или последние дни 3 центра испытаний - YouTube". YouTube . 10 March 2021.
  53. Jacopo Prisco (21 November 2017). "Two abandoned Soviet space shuttles left in the Kazakh steppe". CNN . Retrieved 24 March 2021.
  54. "To restore the "Buran" will have to build a special hangar". 28 December 2021. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
  55. ru:ОК-ТВА
  56. "Space shuttle Buran heat shield thermal black tile excellent condition". Archived from the original on 22 February 2015. Retrieved 1 June 2015.
  57. "Space Shuttle Buran". Technik Museum Speyer. Archived from the original on 6 October 2014. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
  58. Zak, Anatoly. "Buran reusable shuttle". Russian Space Web. Archived from the original on 15 February 2015. Retrieved 22 February 2015. See the last line of the chronology.
  59. "Космический корабль "Буран" установят в детском центре в Сочи". TASS.ru (in Russian). 16 June 2017. Archived from the original on 20 June 2017. Retrieved 21 June 2017.
  60. "Mockup of the legendary Buran orbiter is being readied for shipment to Sirius educational center". Russian Aviation. 29 June 2017. Retrieved 24 January 2019.
  61. ru:ОК-ТВА
  62. "Buran: The Abandoned Russian Space Shuttle". Urban Ghost Media. 30 September 2010. Archived from the original on 23 August 2012. Retrieved 21 August 2012.
  63. "Transportation of the shuttle to the VDNKh park". Buran-Energia.com. Archived from the original on 14 July 2017. Retrieved 21 June 2017.
  64. Makin, Aleksander (11 October 2013). "It no longer exists. Wind tunnel wooden model 1:3 scale model of Buran is at the corner of Zhukovsky airfield". Archived from the original on 19 September 2018. Retrieved 24 January 2019.
  65. "Energia-Buran: Where are they now". K26.com. Archived from the original on 19 May 2006. Retrieved 5 August 2006.
  66. 1 2 Birch, Douglas (5 February 2003). "Russian space programme is handed new responsibility". The Baltimore Sun . Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 17 October 2008.
  67. 1 2 Oberg, James (10 June 2005). "Russia ready to take lead on space station". NBC News. Archived from the original on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 16 July 2009.
  68. "Russia To Review Its Space Shuttle Project". Xinhua. 28 June 2010. Archived from the original on 9 October 2012. Retrieved 28 July 2010 via Space Daily.
  69. "Soviet space shuttle could bail out NASA". Current.com. 31 December 2008. Archived from the original on 8 July 2012. Retrieved 15 July 2009.
  70. "Russia starts ambitious super-heavy space rocket project". Space Daily. 19 November 2013. Archived from the original on 22 December 2013. Retrieved 13 December 2013.
  71. Krivonosov, Khartron: Computers for rocket guidance systems
  72. Control systems for intercontinental ballistic missiles and launch vehicles Archived 2010-02-05 at the Wayback Machine
  73. Russian Space Web, Energia page. Accessed 21 September 2010
  74. 1 2 Bart Hendrickx; Bert Vis (2007). Energiya-Buran: The Soviet Space Shuttle. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN   978-0-387-73984-7.
  75. 1 2 "Launch vehicle Energia". RSC Energia. Archived from the original on 27 June 2021.
  76. B. Hendrickx, "The Origins and Evolution of the Energiya Rocket Family," J. British Interplanetary Soc., Vol. 55, pp. 242-278 (2002).
  77. Zak, Anatoly (25 December 2018). "Buran reusable orbiter". Russian Space Web. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
  78. Bodner, Matthew (6 June 2016). "How Crimea's annexation hurt Ukraine's space program". SpaceNews. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
  79. Pultarova, Tereza (27 August 2023). "Lost partnerships destroying Ukraine's space sector faster than Russian missiles, former space chief says". Space.com. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
  80. "Land Launch User's Guide Revision B" (PDF). Space International Services. 1 October 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 June 2016. Retrieved 8 February 2015.
  81. Harvey, Brian (2007). The Rebirth of the Russian Space Program. Chichester, UK: Praxis. pp. 167–175.
  82. Bergin, Chris (1 February 2013). "Sea Launch Zenit 3SL with Intelsat 27 fails during first stage flight". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved 1 February 2013.
  83. Weiss, Gus W. (1996). "The Farewell Dossier: Duping the Soviets – A Deception Operation". Studies in Intelligence. 39 (5). Central Intelligence Agency. Archived from the original on 27 October 2019. Retrieved 8 August 2012.
  84. "Первая ступень ракеты-носителя "Энергия"". Буран.ру. Retrieved 15 July 2022.
  85. "Space Shuttle: Solid Rocket Boosters". NASA.gov. Archived from the original on 6 April 2013. Retrieved 16 October 2010.
  86. Lukashevich, Vadim. "Объединенная двигательная установка (ОДУ)" [Joint Propulsion System (JPS)]. Buran.ru. Archived from the original on 20 November 2013. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  87. Malik, Tariq (29 June 2006). "Shuttle to Carry Tools for Repair and Remote-Control Landing". Space.com. Archived from the original on 8 March 2014. Retrieved 29 November 2013.
  88. Wade, Mark. "Shuttle". Encyclopedia Astronautica . Archived from the original on 13 March 2012. Retrieved 20 September 2010.
  89. 1 2 Scott, Jeff (5 February 2007). "Soviet Buran Space Shuttle". Aerospaceweb.org. Archived from the original on 7 December 2006. Retrieved 16 October 2004.
  90. 1 2 "Buran Orbiter". Archived from the original on 9 November 2020. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
  91. "Buran". www.astronautix.com. Archived from the original on 2 July 2019. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
  92. "Шасси (посадочные устройства) орбитального корабля "Буран" (11Ф35)" [Buran landing gear]. Buran.ru (in Russian). Retrieved 15 July 2022.
  93. Baturin, I︠U︡. M.; Afanasʹev, I. B. (2005). Mirovai︠a︡ pilotiruemai︠a︡ kosmonavtika : istorii︠a︡, tekhnika, li︠u︡di. Moskva: RTSoft. ISBN   5990027125. OCLC   1256536142.
  94. Chaffee, Norman, ed. (1985). Space Shuttle Technical Conference, Part 1. NASA. p. 258. N85-16889. Archived from the original on 9 November 2016. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
  95. "Buran, the First Russian Shuttle". EnglishRussia.com . 14 September 2006. Archived from the original on 23 August 2012. Retrieved 21 August 2012.
  96. "Russian rockets". The Mars Society. Archived from the original on 20 September 2012. Retrieved 21 August 2012.
  97. "6 Abandoned Mega-Machines: Jumbo Jets, Space Shuttle Transporters & More". Urban Ghosts. 26 January 2011. Archived from the original on 24 August 2012. Retrieved 21 August 2012.
  98. Sands, Jason (May 2007). "NASA Diesel-Powered Shuttle Hauler – The Crawler". Diesel Power . Archived from the original on 6 November 2014. Retrieved 21 August 2012.
  99. Wilson, Jim. "NASA - Shuttle Basics". www.nasa.gov. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  100. Ceccacci, Anthony J.; Dye, Paul F. (12 July 2005). "Contingency Shuttle Crew Support (CSCS)/Rescue Flight Resource Book" (PDF). NASA. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 March 2016. Retrieved 9 September 2014.
  101. "Раскрой плиток". www.buran.ru. Archived from the original on 30 April 2020. Retrieved 29 November 2020.

Bibliography