Barr letter

Last updated

The four-page letter Attorney General William Barr sent to leaders of the House and Senate judiciary committees on March 24, 2019. It claims to describe the principal conclusions of the Special Counsel investigation. AG March 24 2019 Letter to House and Senate Judiciary Committees.pdf
The four-page letter Attorney General William Barr sent to leaders of the House and Senate judiciary committees on March 24, 2019. It claims to describe the principal conclusions of the Special Counsel investigation.

The Barr letter is a four-page letter sent on March 24, 2019, from Attorney General William Barr to leaders of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees purportedly detailing the "principal conclusions" of the Mueller report of the Special Counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller into Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 United States presidential election, allegations of conspiracy or coordination between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and Russia, and allegations of obstruction of justice.

Contents

Even before seeing the Mueller report, Barr had already decided to clear Trump of obstruction. To this end, he tasked the Office of Legal Counsel with writing a memo that would justify this decision. The Barr letter was written over the course of two days in tandem with the legal memo on which the letter ostensibly relied. [1]

After the release of the redacted report on April 18, 2019, Barr's letter was criticized as a deliberate mischaracterization of the Mueller Report and its conclusions, and as an attempt at spinning the media narrative to undermine Mueller's investigation. [2] [3] In March 2020, a federal judge sharply criticized Barr's characterizations and ordered the Justice Department to provide him the redacted portions from the public version of the report so he could determine if they were justified. Following litigation under the Freedom of Information Act, the Justice Department released the full text of the memorandum in August 2022. [4]

Background

On May 17, 2017, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed a special counsel, Robert Mueller, to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation". [5] Mueller concluded his investigations and sent a 448-page written report to Attorney General William Barr on March 22, 2019. [6]

The March 24, 2019 Office of Legal Counsel memo. 2019-03-24 Memorandum to AG from DAG re Mueller Report Review.pdf
The March 24, 2019 Office of Legal Counsel memo.

Barr tasked the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) in the Department of Justice with authoring a memo that would justify the decision Barr had already made to clear Trump of obstruction. [4] [7] [1] The group authored both the memo and Barr letter in tandem over the course of two days; [8] the final memo was signed by Steven Engel and Ed O'Callaghan. [7] [1] [9]

On March 24, Barr sent a four-page letter to the leaders of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees detailing what he said were the report's principal conclusions on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, allegations of coordination between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and Russia, and allegations of obstruction of justice.

On April 18, 2019, the Department of Justice released to the public a two-volume redacted version of Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election , informally known as the "Mueller report".

Contents

Barr's letter describes the conclusions investigated by the Special Counsel investigation. It is split into two sections: Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and allegations of obstruction of justice.

Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election

Barr's letter mentioned two methods found by the special counsel that Russia tried to do to influence the 2016 presidential election. First method: disinformation through social media campaigns by the Internet Research Agency (IRA) "to sow social discord"; and secondly, hacking computers for emails that came from the 2016 Clinton presidential campaign and Democratic National Committee. [10]

Barr quoted the report as saying the "investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities." [11] [12]

Obstruction of justice

Barr wrote that the special counsel "did not draw a conclusion –one way or the other –as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction" [13] and that "The Special Counsel's decision to describe the facts of his obstruction investigation without reaching any legal conclusions leaves it to the Attorney General to determine whether the conduct described in the report constitutes a crime". [14] Barr concluded on obstruction of justice by saying: "Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense". [15]

Comparison between Barr memo and Barr letter

After the Barr letter was released, media commentators have pointed out that previously in June 2018, Barr (who was not working for the government then) wrote an unsolicited 19-page memo to the Department of Justice protesting that Mueller's investigation of President Trump for obstruction is "legally insupportable", [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] and "fatally misconceived". [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] The memo continued by saying that Trump was within his power to firstly ask then-FBI Director James Comey to stop investigating Michael Flynn, first and former National Security Advisor to Trump, and to secondly fire Comey. [25] Barr further wrote that it would be detrimental to the institution of the presidency if Trump were accused of a crime when he fired Comey, a subordinate. [22] [23]

Both the 2018 memo and the Barr letter argued that an underlying crime (in this case, "related to Russian election interference") was needed for obstruction to occur. [19] Democrats referred to the memo in suggesting that Barr's decision on obstruction was biased. [17] Time magazine said "Barr has already realized some of Democrats' biggest fears", then went on to describe the memo. [23] USA Today wrote that Barr's decision in the letter "rekindled concerns among Democratic lawmakers" about the memo, [19] while CNN wrote that the Barr letter gave the memo "heightened relevance". [25] Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein previously said that the memo had "no impact on the investigation", but The Guardian points to the memo as why Barr's decision on obstruction in the letter is "controversial". [21]

The New Yorker wrote that in light of Barr's decision in the Barr letter, the memo raises questions on whether Barr should have recused from the special counsel investigation, as it has already done before when Barr was nominated for Attorney General. [16] The Los Angeles Times wrote that Barr used similar reasoning in both the 2018 memo and Barr letter, [22] while NPR similarly wrote that the memo which "was a precursor to" the Barr letter. [24] Regarding the decision on obstruction in the Barr letter, The Washington Post wrote that the memo "suggests Barr didn't think there was much of a case in the first place", [18] while The Irish Times wrote that "Barr already made his views clear" earlier in the memo. [20]

Comparison of findings between Barr letter and Mueller Report

After the release of the redacted report, Barr's letter was criticized as a deliberate mischaracterization of the Mueller Report and its conclusions, and as an attempt at spinning the media narrative to undermine Mueller's investigation. [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] Numerous legal analysts concluded that Barr's letter did not accurately portray some of the findings of the investigation, casting Trump in a better light than was intended in the report. The New York Times reported instances in which the Barr letter omitted information and quoted sentence fragments out of context in ways that significantly altered the findings in the report, including: [26]

CNN wrote that while Barr in his letter took it upon himself to deliver a ruling on whether Trump had committed obstruction, the redacted report indicates that Mueller intended that decision to be made by Congress, not Barr. [36] [ clarification needed ]

Numerous other political and legal analysts, including Bob Woodward [37] and Brian Williams, [38] observed significant differences in what Barr said about Mueller's findings in his letter, and in his April 18 press conference, compared to what the Mueller Report actually found. This commentary included a comparison of Barr to Baghdad Bob, calling him "Baghdad Bill". [38] [39] [40] [41]

Barr wrote that his letter provided "the principal conclusions" of the Mueller Report. Ryan Goodman, a professor at the New York University School of Law and co-editor of Just Security , observed that in 1989, Barr also wrote a letter which he stated contained "the principal conclusions" of a controversial legal opinion[ which? ] he worked on as head of the OLC. Barr declined to provide the full opinion to Congress, but it was later subpoenaed and released to the public, showing that the 1989 letter did not fully disclose the principal conclusions. [42] [43]

Reactions

Robert Mueller

Letter from Robert Mueller III to William P. Barr objecting to Barr's characterization of the conclusions of the Mueller Report Mueller letter to Barr 2019-03-27.pdf
Letter from Robert Mueller III to William P. Barr objecting to Barr's characterization of the conclusions of the Mueller Report

On March 25, a day after the Barr letter was released, Robert Mueller himself reportedly wrote a letter to Barr, as described in the New York Times as "expressing his and his team's concerns that the attorney general had inadequately portrayed their conclusions". [44] In USA Today it was described that Mueller "expressed his differences with Barr". [45]

On March 27, Mueller sent Barr another letter describing his concerns of Barr's letter to Congress and the public on March 24. Mueller thought that Barr's letter "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the findings. "There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations." Mueller also requested Barr release the Mueller Report's introductions and executive summaries. This was first reported on April 30, 2019. [46] [47] [48]

Letter from Attorney General William P. Barr on March 29 to the chairs of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees Letter from Attorney General William Barr to Graham and Nadler 2019-03-29.pdf
Letter from Attorney General William P. Barr on March 29 to the chairs of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees

The next day on March 28, Mueller had a phone conversation with Barr and reportedly expressed concerns about public misunderstandings of the obstruction investigation due to a lack of context released by Barr's letter. In their phone conversation, Barr reportedly said that his letter was not intended to be a summary, but rather only as a description of the principal findings of Mueller's report, and said he preferred not to release more information until a more complete redacted version of the report could be prepared. Barr then sent a subsequent letter to Congress in which he reiterated that his letter had not been intended as a summary of the Mueller Report and volunteered to testify before Congress in early May. [47]

Some members of the special counsel team

On April 3, 2019, some members of the Mueller investigation team, who spoke on condition of anonymity, expressed concerns to the press that Barr's letter did not accurately portray some of the findings of the investigation, casting Trump in a better light than was intended in the report. [49]

President Donald Trump

On Barr's decision to clear him on obstruction, Trump said in late April 2019 that Barr read the Mueller Report "and he made a decision right on the spot. No obstruction." [50] [51]

Members of Congress

In a joint statement, Democrats House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said that Barr is "not a neutral observer". They also said that Barr's past "bias" against the special counsel (Barr's memo) showed that he was "not in a position to make objective determinations". [52]

In May 2019, Republican US Representative Justin Amash (who in July 2019 became an Independent) stated "it is clear that Barr intended to mislead the public about Special Counsel Robert Mueller's analysis and findings", adding, "Barr's misrepresentations are significant but often subtle, frequently taking the form of sleight-of-hand qualifications or logical fallacies, which he hopes people will not notice." [53]

In his own statement, Republican House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy declared, based on the conclusions in the Barr Letter and the vast scope and resources made available to Mueller, that "This case is closed." [54] McCarthy emphasized a need to move on from the investigation "after months upon months of manufactured outrage."

Freedom of Information Act Litigation

In 2019, following the release of the Barr letter, several parties, including Jason Leopold, Electronic Privacy Information Center and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, filed records requests under the Freedom of Information Act regarding the Justice Department's handling of the Mueller report, including the internal Office of Legal Counsel memorandum that recommended against charging Trump. [55] [56] [57] [58] The Department of Justice refused to release the memorandum and related records, citing the doctrine of deliberative process privilege and attorney-client privilege, a decision which the filers appealed in court. [59]

On March 5, 2020, Reggie Walton, a senior judge of the D.C. district court, sharply criticized Barr's characterizations of the Mueller Report as "distorted" and "misleading" and called "into question Attorney General Barr's credibility and, in turn, the department's" representations to the Court. Walton asked if Barr's characterizations were a "calculated attempt" to help the president. He ordered the Justice Department to show him the redacted portions from the public version of the report so he could determine if they were justified. [60] [61] [55]

In May 2021, D.C. district court judge Amy Berman Jackson ordered the release of the OLC memo supporting the Barr letter, criticizing Barr's characterizations of the Mueller report as "disingenuous" and ruling that deliberative process privilege did not apply because "[t]he review of the document reveals that the Attorney General was not then engaged in making a decision about whether the President should be charged with obstruction of justice; the fact that he would not be prosecuted was a given." [62] [59] The Justice Department appealed this decision, and in August 2022, a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously upheld Jackson's order, ruling that Barr had never considered charging Trump and likened the memo to a "thought experiment"; [7] [1] the Department of Justice released the full memo the following week. [7]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Mueller</span> American attorney (born 1944)

Robert Swan Mueller III is an American lawyer who served as the sixth director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) from 2001 to 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Office of Legal Counsel</span> Office of the United States Department of Justice

The Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) is an office in the United States Department of Justice that supports the attorney general in their role as legal adviser to the president and all executive branch agencies. It drafts legal opinions of the attorney general and provides its own written opinions and other advice in response to requests from the counsel to the president, the various agencies of the executive branch, and other components of the Department of Justice. The office reviews and comments on the constitutionality of pending legislation. The office reviews any executive orders and substantive proclamations for legality if the president proposes them. All proposed orders of the attorney general and regulations that require the attorney general's approval are reviewed. It also performs a variety of special assignments referred by the attorney general or the deputy attorney general.

The Office of Special Counsel was an office of the United States Department of Justice established by provisions in the Ethics in Government Act that expired in 1999. The provisions were replaced by Department of Justice regulation 28 CFR Part 600, which created the successor office of special counsel. The current regulations were drafted by former acting solicitor general Neal Katyal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Barr</span> American attorney (born 1950)

William Pelham Barr is an American attorney who served as United States attorney general in the administration of President George H. W. Bush from 1991 to 1993 and again in the administration of President Donald Trump from 2019 to 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Durham</span> American prosecutor (born 1950)

John Henry Durham is an American lawyer who served as the United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut from 2018 to 2021. By April 2019, the Trump administration assigned him to investigate the origins of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections, and in October 2020 he was appointed special counsel for the Department of Justice on that matter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rod Rosenstein</span> American attorney (born 1965)

Rod Jay Rosenstein is an American attorney who served as the 37th United States deputy attorney general from April 2017 until May 2019. Prior to his appointment, he served as a United States attorney for the District of Maryland. At the time of his confirmation as deputy attorney general in April 2017, he was the longest-serving U.S. attorney. Rosenstein had also been nominated to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in 2007, but his nomination was never considered by the U.S. Senate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Efforts to impeach Donald Trump</span> Efforts to impeach the 21st-century US president

Various people and groups assert that former U.S. president Donald Trump engaged in impeachable activity both before and during his presidency, and talk of impeachment began before he took office. Grounds asserted for impeachment have included possible violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause of the Constitution by accepting payments from foreign dignitaries; alleged collusion with Russia during the campaign for the 2016 United States presidential election; alleged obstruction of justice with respect to investigation of the collusion claim; and accusations of "Associating the Presidency with White Nationalism, Neo-Nazism and Hatred", which formed the basis of a resolution for impeachment brought on December 6, 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Steven Engel</span> American lawyer (born 1974)

Steven Andrew Engel is an American lawyer. He served as the United States assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel in the first Trump administration. Engel, who previously worked in the George W. Bush administration as deputy assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel, was nominated by President Donald Trump on January 31, 2017, and confirmed on November 7, 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dismissal of James Comey</span> Politically-charged firing

James Comey, the seventh director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), was fired by U.S. President Donald Trump on May 9, 2017. Comey had been criticized in 2016 for his handling of the FBI's investigation of the Hillary Clinton email controversy and in 2017 for the FBI's investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections as it related to alleged collusion with Trump's presidential campaign.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen Boyd (attorney)</span> American lawyer (born 1979)

Stephen Elliott Boyd is an American lawyer who served as the United States Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legislative Affairs from 2017 to 2021. He currently serves as Chief of Staff to Alabama Senator Tommy Tuberville.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mueller special counsel investigation</span> U.S. investigation into Russian interference in U.S. elections

The Robert Mueller special counsel investigation was an investigation into 45th U.S. president Donald Trump regarding Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections and was conducted by special prosecutor Robert Mueller from May 2017 to March 2019. It was also called the Russia investigation, Mueller probe, and Mueller investigation. The investigation focused on three points:

  1. Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
  2. Trump associates and their connection to Russian officials and espionage
  3. Possible obstruction of justice by Trump and his associates

Reactions to the Special Counsel investigation of any Russian government efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election have been widely varied and have evolved over time. An initial period of bipartisan support and praise for the selection of former FBI director Robert Mueller to lead the Special Counsel investigation gave way to some degree of partisan division over the scope of the investigation, the composition of the investigative teams, and its findings and conclusions.

This is a timeline of events in the first half of 2019 related to investigations into the many suspicious links between Trump associates and Russian officials and spies relating to the Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. It follows the timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, both before and after July 2016, until November 8, 2016, the transition, the first and second halves of 2017, the first and second halves of 2018, and followed by the second half of 2019, 2020, and 2021.

Crossfire Hurricane was the code name for the counterintelligence investigation undertaken by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) from July 31, 2016, to May 17, 2017, into links between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and Russia and "whether individuals associated with [Trump's] presidential campaign were coordinating, wittingly or unwittingly, with the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidential election". Trump was not personally under investigation until May 2017, when his firing of FBI director James Comey raised suspicions of obstruction of justice, which triggered the Mueller investigation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mueller report</span> 2019 U.S. government report on Russian interference in the 2016 election

The Mueller report, officially titled Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election, is the official report documenting the findings and conclusions of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 United States presidential election, allegations of conspiracy or coordination between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and Russia, and allegations of obstruction of justice. The report was submitted to Attorney General William Barr on March 22, 2019, and a redacted version of the 448-page report was publicly released by the Department of Justice (DOJ) on April 18, 2019. It is divided into two volumes. The redactions from the report and its supporting material were placed under a temporary "protective assertion" of executive privilege by then-President Trump on May 8, 2019, preventing the material from being passed to Congress, despite earlier reassurance by Barr that Trump would not exert privilege.

The Russia investigation origins counter-narrative, or Russia counter-narrative, is a narrative embraced by Donald Trump, Republican Party leaders, and right-wing conservatives attacking the legitimacy and conclusions of investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 elections, and the links between Russian intelligence and Trump associates. The counter-narrative includes conspiracy theories such as Spygate, accusations of a secretive, elite "deep state" network, and other false and debunked claims. Trump in particular has attacked not only the origins but the conclusions of the investigation, and ordered a review of the Mueller report, which was conducted by attorney general William Barr – alleging there was a "deep state plot" to undermine him. He has claimed the investigations were an "illegal hoax", and that the "real collusion" was between Hillary Clinton, Democrats, and Russia – and later, Ukraine.

<i>Department of Justice v. House Committee on the Judiciary</i> United States Supreme Court Case

Department of Justice v. House Committee on the Judiciary (2020), No. 19-1328, was a court decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The case weighs whether a committee of the House of Representatives can assert the House's "sole power of impeachment" to subpoena materials gathered as part of a federal grand jury investigation which are ordinarily secret. Due to changes in the government by the time of the 2020 election, many of the aspects leading to the case have become unnecessary, and the Supreme Court ruled the case moot in orders released in July 2021.

This is a timeline of events from 2020 to 2022 related to investigations into the many suspicious links between Trump associates and Russian officials and spies relating to the Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. It follows the timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, both before and after July 2016, until November 8, 2016, election day, the transition, the first and second halves of 2017, the first and second halves of 2018, and the first and second halves of 2019.

<i>Where Law Ends</i> 2020 non-fiction book by Andrew Weissmann

Where Law Ends: Inside the Mueller Investigation is a best-selling non-fiction book written by Andrew Weissmann, a former Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA), and later a General Counsel of the Federal Bureau of Investigation from 2011 to 2013. Released by Random House on September 29, 2020, the widely read book gives an insider's view into Department of Justice special counsel Robert Mueller's highly controversial investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election of Donald Trump.

The Mueller special counsel investigation was started by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who was serving as Acting Attorney General due to the recusal of Attorney General Jeff Sessions. He authorized Robert Mueller to investigate and prosecute "any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump", as well as "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation" and any other matters within the scope of 28 CFR 600.4 – Jurisdiction.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Gerstein, Josh; Cheney, Kyle (August 19, 2022). "Appeals court backs ruling to release DOJ memo on Trump prosecution". Politico . Retrieved August 30, 2022. Srinivasan said the memo, co-authored by Assistant Attorney General for Legal Counsel Steven Engel and Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Edward O'Callaghan, seemed more like a 'thought experiment' because Barr decided before the memo was written that Trump would not be charged with a crime.
  2. ↑ Sullivan, Margaret (November 10, 2019). "Media beware: Impeachment hearings will be the trickiest test of covering Trump". The Washington Post . Archived from the original on November 10, 2019. Retrieved November 11, 2019.
  3. ↑ Toobin, Jeffrey (June 29, 2020). "Why the Mueller Investigation Failed". The New Yorker. In just two days, without speaking to the authors of the report about their evidence or their conclusions, Barr and Rosenstein asserted that they had digested hundreds of pages of dense findings and decided that the President had not committed a crime. The letter was an obvious act of sabotage against Mueller and an extraordinary gift to the President. By leaving the disclosure of the report and its conclusions entirely up to Barr, Mueller had brought this disaster on himself and his staff.
  4. 1 2 Chaitin, Daniel (August 24, 2022). "DOJ releases memo advising Barr on not pursuing Trump obstruction charges". Washington Examiner . Retrieved August 29, 2022. 'The court's ... review of the memorandum revealed that the Department in fact never considered bringing a charge,' the panel wrote in its opinion. 'Instead, the memorandum concerned a separate decision that had gone entirely unmentioned by the government in its submissions to the court — what, if anything, to say to Congress and the public about the Mueller Report.' The panel added: 'We affirm the district court.'
  5. ↑ Rosenstein, Rod (May 17, 2017). "Order No. 3915-2017: Appointment of Special Counsel". United States Department of Justice. Archived from the original on August 7, 2018. Retrieved April 25, 2019.
  6. ↑ Breuninger, Kevin (March 22, 2019). "Mueller Probe Ends: Special counsel submits Russia report to". CNBC. Archived from the original on March 22, 2019. Retrieved May 1, 2019.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Mallin, Alexander (August 24, 2022). "DOJ releases memo behind Barr's decision not to prosecute Trump for obstruction". ABC News. Retrieved August 29, 2022. DOJ officials previously told the court that the memo should be kept from the public because it involved internal department deliberations and the advice given to Barr about whether Trump should face prosecution. But a district judge ruled that Barr was never engaged in such a process and had already made up his mind to not charge Trump.
  8. ↑ Tucker, Eric (May 5, 2021). "Judge orders Justice Dept. To release Trump obstruction memo". Associated Press . Retrieved August 29, 2022. In her order, Jackson noted that the memo prepared for Barr, and the letter from Barr to Congress that describes the special counsel's report, are 'being written by the very same people at the very same time. The emails show not only that the authors and the recipients of the memorandum are working hand in hand to craft the advice that is supposedly being delivered by OLC, but that the letter to Congress is the priority, and it is getting completed first,' the judge wrote.
  9. ↑ Engel, Steven A.; O'Callaghan, Edward C. (March 24, 2019). "Memorandum for the Attorney General: Review of the Special Counsel's Report" (PDF). United States Department of Justice . Retrieved August 30, 2022– via Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
  10. ↑ "Read Attorney General William Barr's Summary of the Mueller Report". The New York Times . March 24, 2019. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved May 1, 2019.
  11. ↑ Cotter, Sean (March 24, 2019). "DOJ: Trump campaign didn't collude with Russians". bostonherald.com . Archived from the original on May 1, 2019. Retrieved May 1, 2019.
  12. ↑ Barr, William (March 24, 2019), English: The Attorney General (PDF), archived (PDF) from the original on February 9, 2021, retrieved March 24, 2019– via Wikimedia Commons
  13. ↑ Barr letter Archived April 1, 2019, at the Wayback Machine p. 3: Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion –one way or the other –as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.
  14. ↑ Barr letter Archived April 1, 2019, at the Wayback Machine p. 3: The Special Counsel's decision to describe the facts of his obstruction investigation without reaching any legal conclusions leaves it to the Attorney General to determine whether the conduct described in the report constitutes a crime.
  15. ↑ Barr letter Archived April 1, 2019, at the Wayback Machine p. 3: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense. Our determination was made without regard to, and is not based on, the constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting president.
  16. 1 2 Lach, Eric (March 24, 2019). "William Barr, the Mueller Report, and the Question of Obstruction by Trump". The New Yorker . Archived from the original on March 29, 2019. Retrieved April 30, 2019.
  17. 1 2 Chalfant, Morgan; Lillis, Mike (March 30, 2019). "Questions mount over Mueller, Barr and obstruction". The Hill . Archived from the original on April 3, 2019. Retrieved April 30, 2019.
  18. 1 2 Blake, Aaron (April 17, 2019). "The fastest way to Trump's heart (and an administration job): Say what he wants to hear, publicly". The Washington Post . Archived from the original on May 3, 2019. Retrieved April 30, 2019.
  19. 1 2 3 Jansen, Bart; Phillips, Kristine (March 25, 2019). "Congressional Democrats question AG William Barr's decision that Trump didn't obstruct justice". USA Today . Archived from the original on April 18, 2019. Retrieved April 30, 2019.
  20. 1 2 Finucane, Martin (March 24, 2019). "Here's what legal experts say about the Mueller report findings". The Irish Times . Archived from the original on March 26, 2019. Retrieved April 30, 2019.
  21. 1 2 Kirchgaessner, Stephanie (April 5, 2019). "DoJ officials told of Barr meeting on day he submitted memo critical of Mueller". The Guardian . Archived from the original on April 25, 2019. Retrieved April 25, 2019.
  22. 1 2 3 Megerian, Chris (March 25, 2019). "Controversy surrounds Barr's decision on obstruction issue". Los Angeles Times . Archived from the original on April 30, 2019. Retrieved April 25, 2019.
  23. 1 2 3 Berenson, Tessa (March 28, 2019). "Robert Mueller's Work Is Done. What Happens Next Is Up to William Barr". Time . Archived from the original on May 3, 2019. Retrieved April 26, 2019.
  24. 1 2 Elving, Ron (April 15, 2019). "Mueller Report Release Will Likely Escalate Tensions Between Trump And Congress". NPR. Archived from the original on April 26, 2019. Retrieved April 26, 2019.
  25. 1 2 3 Watkins, Eli (March 26, 2019). "Barr authored memo last year ruling out obstruction of justice". CNN. Archived from the original on November 22, 2019. Retrieved April 28, 2019.
  26. 1 2 Savage, Charlie (April 20, 2019). "How Barr's Excerpts Compare to the Mueller Report's Findings". The New York Times . Archived from the original on April 20, 2019. Retrieved April 21, 2019.
  27. ↑ Dickinson, Tim (April 19, 2019). "Re-Read Bill Barr's Infamous Letter With Full Quotes From the Mueller Report". Rolling Stone . Archived from the original on April 20, 2019. Retrieved April 21, 2019.
  28. ↑ Denning, Steve (April 19, 2019). "How Attorney General Barr Misled America". Forbes . Archived from the original on April 21, 2019. Retrieved April 21, 2019.
  29. ↑ Rizzo, Salvador (April 19, 2019). "What Attorney General Barr said vs. what the Mueller report said". The Washington Post . Archived from the original on April 21, 2019. Retrieved April 21, 2019.
  30. ↑ Eliason, Randall D. (April 19, 2019). "William Barr's incredibly misleading words". The Washington Post . Archived from the original on April 20, 2019. Retrieved April 21, 2019.
  31. ↑ Chait, Jonathan (April 18, 2019). "Congress Should Impeach William Barr". Intelligencer . Archived from the original on April 20, 2019. Retrieved April 21, 2019– via New York.
  32. ↑ Kilgore, Ed (April 30, 2019). "Mueller Complained to Barr About His Spin on Russian Investigation". Intelligencer . Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved September 27, 2019– via New York.
  33. ↑ Benen, Steve (April 19, 2019). "The latest in a series of 'Mission Accomplished' moments for Trump". MSNBC . Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved April 24, 2019.
  34. ↑ Bernstein, Jonathan (April 22, 2019). "Opinion: Congress will pick up where Mueller left off". Newsday . Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved May 2, 2019.
  35. ↑ Buncombe, Andrew (April 18, 2019). "Mueller Report: Trump leaves town claiming victory and with Democrats scrambling to respond". The Independent . Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved April 24, 2019.
  36. ↑ Honig, Elie (April 24, 2019). "Don McGahn could decide Trump's political fate". CNN . Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved April 25, 2019.
  37. ↑ Hall, Colby (April 19, 2019). "Bob Woodward: AG Barr Will Be Remembered for the Deception and Misrepresentation of the Mueller Report". Mediaite . Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved April 23, 2019.
  38. 1 2 DePaolo, Joe (April 19, 2019). "MSNBC's Brian Williams on AG Barr: I Wouldn't Be Surprised if People Starting Calling Him 'Baghdad Bill'". Mediaite . Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved April 23, 2019.
  39. ↑ Mariotti, Renato (April 19, 2019). "The Obstruction Case Against Trump that Barr Tried to Hide". Politico . Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved April 23, 2019.
  40. ↑ Auber, Tamar (April 19, 2019). "MSNBC's Wallace, Heilemann Run a Scathing Fact-Check on AG Barr: 'He Just Lies'". Mediaite . Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved April 23, 2019.
  41. ↑ Feldman, Josh (April 19, 2019). "Former Federal Prosecutor on CNN: Barr's 'Credibility and Independence are in the Trash'". Mediaite . Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved April 23, 2019.
  42. ↑ Goodman, Ryan (April 15, 2019). "Barr's Playbook: He Misled Congress When Omitting Parts of Justice Dep't Memo in 1989". Just Security. Archived from the original on September 14, 2019. Retrieved May 6, 2019.
  43. ↑ Bump, Philip (April 15, 2019). "The 1989 precedent that raises questions about how Barr will redact the Mueller report". The Washington Post . Retrieved May 6, 2019.
  44. ↑ Mazzetti, Mark; Schmidt, Michael (May 2019). "When the Mueller Investigation Ended, the Battle Over Its Conclusions Began". The New York Times . Archived from the original on May 28, 2019. Retrieved May 29, 2019.
  45. ↑ Johnson, Kevin; Phillips, Kristine (May 1, 2019). "Mueller: Barr's summary of report did not capture 'context, nature, and substance' of Russia probe". USA Today . Archived from the original on May 29, 2019. Retrieved May 29, 2019.
  46. ↑ Williams, Pete (April 30, 2019). "A frustrated Mueller told AG Barr his short summary of the special counsel report caused confusion". NBC News . Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved May 1, 2019.
  47. 1 2 Barrett, Devlin; Zapotosky, Matt (April 30, 2019). "Mueller complained that Barr's letter did not capture 'context' of Trump probe". The Washington Post . Archived from the original on April 30, 2019. Retrieved May 1, 2019.
  48. ↑ "Special Counsel Mueller's letter to Attorney General Barr". The Washington Post . May 1, 2019. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved May 2, 2019.
  49. ↑ Fandos, Nicholas; Schmidt, Michael S.; Mazzetti, Mark (April 3, 2019). "Some on Mueller's Team Say Report Was More Damaging Than Barr Revealed". The New York Times . Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved April 24, 2019.
  50. ↑ Cillizza, Chris (April 26, 2019). "The 45 most outrageous lines from Donald Trump's rambling interview with Sean Hannity". CNN . Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved May 1, 2019.
  51. ↑ Zurcher, Anthony (May 1, 2019). "William Barr: Five questions for US attorney general". BBC News . Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved May 1, 2019.
  52. ↑ Miles, Frank (March 24, 2019). "Pelosi, Schumer, other top Dems question impartiality of Barr letter about Mueller report". Fox News. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved May 1, 2019.
  53. ↑ Amash, Justin [@justinamash] (May 18, 2019). "In comparing Barr's principal conclusions, congressional testimony, and other statements to Mueller's report, it is clear that Barr intended to mislead the public about Special Counsel Robert Mueller's analysis and findings" (Tweet). Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved May 5, 2021– via Twitter.
  54. ↑ "Statement on Special Counsel Mueller's Report". kevinmccarthy.house.gov (Press release). March 25, 2019. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved October 9, 2020.
  55. 1 2 Gerstein, Josh (March 5, 2020). "Judge slams Barr, orders review of Mueller report deletions". Politico . Retrieved March 8, 2024.
  56. ↑ Leopold, Jason; Cormier, Anthony (April 17, 2019). "Here Are 17 Things BuzzFeed News Is Trying To Pry Loose About The Mueller Investigation". BuzzFeed News . Retrieved March 8, 2024.
  57. ↑ "CREW requests OLC views on whether Trump obstructed justice". Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (Press release). Retrieved March 8, 2024.
  58. ↑ Shaw, Conor; Weismann, Anne (June 26, 2020). "The DOJ decided not to prosecute Trump. It's hiding the reason why". Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (Press release). Retrieved March 8, 2024.
  59. 1 2 Gerstein, Josh (May 4, 2021). "Judge orders release of DOJ memo justifying not prosecuting Trump". Politico . Retrieved March 8, 2024.
  60. ↑ Savage, Charlie (March 5, 2020). "Judge Calls Barr's Handling of Mueller Report 'Distorted' and 'Misleading'". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 5, 2020. Retrieved February 15, 2021.
  61. ↑ Polantz, Katelyn (March 7, 2020). "Federal judge blasts William Barr for Mueller report rollout". CNN. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved February 15, 2021.
  62. ↑ Hsu, Spencer S. (May 5, 2021). "Judge blasts Barr, Justice Dept. for 'disingenuous' handling of secret Trump obstruction memo". The Washington Post . Retrieved March 8, 2024.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.