Group voting ticket

Last updated
Part of the Politics series
Voting
Vote icon.svg
Balloting
Ballots
Candidates and Ballot measures
Collection
Counting
Electoral systems
Plurality and majoritarian systems
Proportional and semi-proportional systems
Mixed-member systems
Voting strategies
Protest votes
Voting patterns and effects
Protest votes
Electoral fraud and prevention
Prevention
A coloured voting box.svg Politicsportal

A group voting ticket (GVT) is a shortcut for voters in a preferential voting system, where a voter can indicate support for a list of candidates instead of marking preferences for individual candidates. For multi-member electoral divisions with single transferable voting, a group or party registers a GVT before an election with the electoral commission. When a voter selects a group or party above the line on a ballot paper, their vote is distributed according to the registered GVT for that group.

Contents

In Australia it is known as group ticket vote or ticket voting. [1] As of 2022, group voting tickets are still used for elections in only two jurisdictions in the country: the Victorian Legislative Council, the upper house of the legislature in the Australian state of Victoria, and the Councillor ballot for City of Melbourne local government elections. [2] In South Australia House of Assembly elections, parties can submit preference tickets which are used to save a vote that would otherwise be informal. GVTs have been abolished by New South Wales, South Australia and Western Australia. [3] They were used in the Australian Senate from the 1984 federal election [4] [5] until the 2013 federal election. Tasmania has never used ticket voting. [6]

A form of GVT is used for some elections in Fiji.

The introduction of GVTs in Australia led to the proliferation of microparties and the creation of preference deals between them, enabling one or more candidates within the network of parties to receive sufficient preferences to achieve the quota for election, especially in multi-member electoral divisions. Such preference deals were first arranged for the 1999 NSW election, where three members of the Minor Party Alliance were elected.

Above the line voting

Australian Senate ballot paper used in Victoria for 2016 Victorian-senate-paper-folded-01.png
Australian Senate ballot paper used in Victoria for 2016

Every Australian jurisdiction that has introduced GVTs has ballot papers with two sections separated by a line. Voters may choose to vote either above the line or below the line. By voting below the line voters can rank candidates individually by numbering boxes. Voters can choose to vote for a group ticket by placing the number '1' in one of the ticket boxes above the line. The single number '1' selects a GVT from one group or party, and all preferences are then distributed according to the GVT. This leads to pre-election trading between parties on how each group will allocate later preferences to other groups and candidates.

About 95% of voters vote above the line. [7]

In elections where GVTs have been abolished (for the Australian Senate, the New South Wales Legislative Council, the South Australian Legislative Council and the Western Australian Legislative Council), voters can express an order of preferences for parties by voting '1', '2' and so on in different boxes above the line. The scope of a number above the line is merely the list of candidates for that party, so Group Voting Tickets are no longer used in those elections. The party supplies a list of its candidates to the Australian Electoral Commission, New South Wales Electoral Commission, Electoral Commission of South Australia or Western Australian Electoral Commission before the election. All four jurisdictions have limited optional preferential voting, which enables voters to number as many boxes as they choose, but the number only applies to the registered party list.

History

Voting is compulsory in all Australian jurisdictions for all houses of Parliament.

Complete preferences voting was the only option available for the Australian Senate and the upper houses of other jurisdictions. With proportional representation and preferential voting, it was daunting for many voters to have to fill in scores of boxes on the ballot paper. Some voters would choose their early preferences and then vote for other candidates in the order they appeared on the ballot paper—known as a donkey vote ; or fill in the form incorrectly, leading to an informal vote. To ease this task, the GVT option was introduced to permit voters to choose one party or group, and all the remaining squares were deemed to be filled in according to a registered party ticket.

Group voting tickets were introduced for elections for the Australian Senate by the Hawke government to reduce the number of invalid votes by simplifying the voting system for the Senate. Under the new system a voter cast a valid vote if they placed a single mark above the line instead of the scores on a typical Senate ballot paper. It was first used at the 1984 federal election. [4] For the Australian Senate, the rate of informal voting was reduced from around 9% before 1984, to around 3%.

Group voting tickets were introduced in South Australia in 1985 [8] in New South Wales [9] and Western Australia [10] in 1987 and in Victoria in 1988. [11]

Following the use of tactical preference tickets and the record number of minor parties contesting the 1999 NSW election for the New South Wales Legislative Council, a modified form of "above the line" voting was introduced for the 2003 NSW election, effectively abolishing GVTs. Other changes to party registration processes also resulted in many fewer parties contesting NSW Legislative Council elections.

New South Wales changed "above the line" voting for Legislative Council before the 2003 NSW election to optional preferential voting. Parties are now required to submit a higher minimum number of qualified members. A candidate group for Legislative Council elections now requires at least 15 candidates to be eligible for an "above the line" box. Parties do not register group preference tickets and a single 1 in a group's box only preferences the candidates in the group. Voters wishing to preference multiple parties with an "above the line" vote can use lower preferences ("2", "3", and so on) in those parties' "above the line" boxes. The changes reduced the number of parties contesting elections and increased the difficulty for new small parties to be elected.

Group voting tickets for the Senate were abolished in March 2016 in favour of optional preferential voting [12] in time for the 2016 federal election.

South Australia changed from group voting tickets to optional preferential voting before the 2018 South Australian election. Instructions for above the line votes are to mark '1' and then further preferences are optional. The effect of an above the line vote is now to vote for all candidates in a single group in order, and not to follow a GVT. Voters who vote below the line are instructed to provide at least 12 preferences as opposed to having to number all candidates, and with a savings provision to admit ballot papers which indicate at least 6 below the line preferences. [13]

In November 2021, the Western Australian parliament passed legislation to abolish GVTs and move to optional preferential voting, [14] after several minor parties were elected and came close to being elected despite earning 2% or less of the vote; [15] in particular, the election of the Daylight Saving Party with only 98 votes in an area known for voting strongly against daylight saving was cited as to why this legislation was quickly passed. [16] [17]

JurisdictionBody elected"Above the line" introducedGroup voting tickets used"Below the line" preferences
Federal Parliament Senate 19841984 - 2016Optional
New South Wales Legislative Council 19871988 - 2003Optional
South Australia Legislative Council 19851985 - 2018Optional
Victoria Legislative Council 19881988 - presentOptional
Western Australia Legislative Council 19891989 - 2021Optional

Criticism

Group voting tickets voting has been criticised because electors usually do not know, and it is difficult to find out, where their preferences are being directed. All details are published in advance, both electronically and in a free booklet published by the Australian Electoral Commission or the appropriate State electoral commission. The booklets may be viewed at polling booths on request to the poll officials. However, such is the complexity of the information that it is unlikely that the average voter could easily determine the fate of their vote's preferences, particularly as some parties submit multiple allocations (e.g., 33% to one party, 66% to another, and so on), and the effects are integrally wound up in preference deals between other parties.

Using GVTs, the potential for tactical voting by parties is greatly increased. Because voters are not usually aware of how a party's preferences are directed, GVTs have allowed minor parties with low support to be elected almost exclusively on the preferences of other parties, for example, where small parties with very different views have agreed to exchange preferences, or where larger parties have sought to minimise votes for opponents with similar views. A notable case was the 1999 New South Wales state election when the Outdoor Recreation Party's Malcolm Jones was elected to the Legislative Council with a primary vote of 0.19%, [18] or 0.042 of a quota.

GVTs came under scrutiny at the 2013 Australian election for multiple candidates getting provisionally elected with the vast majority of the 14.3% quota being filled from preferences, with "preference whisperer" Glenn Druery's Minor Party Alliance organising tight cross-preferencing between minor parties. [19] [20] [21] Ricky Muir from the Australian Motoring Enthusiast Party won a senate seat on a record-low primary vote of 0.5% in Victoria [22] [23] (previous record held by Family First's Steve Fielding in 2004 on 1.9% in Victoria). [24] The Sports Party's Wayne Dropulich was on track for a period of time to win a Senate seat from 0.2% in Western Australia, coming 21st out of 28 groups. [25] [26] [27] Family First's Bob Day won a seat on a primary vote of 3.8% in South Australia, [23] [28] and the DLP's John Madigan won his seat in 2010 on a primary vote of 2.3% in Victoria. [29] Senator Nick Xenophon and larger parties including the government proposed changes to the GVT system. [30] [31] [32] Following the 2018 Victorian state election, the Victorian Greens demanded that Victoria discontinue using group voting, describing it as "corrupt" and "undemocratic", following the election of Sustainable Australia candidate Clifford Hayes to the legislative council on 1.2% of the primary vote. [33]

In the 2021 Western Australian state election, GVTs once again came under scrutiny after the Daylight Saving Party was elected to the Legislative Council with just 98 votes, or 0.2% of the electorate; the electorate had notably voted strongly against adopting a daylight saving system in prior referendums. [16] Additionally, the Legalise Cannabis WA party won a seat on the council with only 2% of the vote; [15] the No Mandatory Vaccination Party almost won a seat through votes given by other smaller parties through GVTs (despite none of these parties individually earning more than 1.9% of the vote), however, were defeated due to the Liberals preferencing the Greens above any of the smaller parties therefore allowing the latter to win. [34] This led to the state government to quickly pass legislation which abolished GVTs in November of that same year. [14]

Ticket voting in the South Australian House of Assembly

GVTs and "above the line" voting have been used for upper house elections in the jurisdictions described above. In the lower house of most Australian states and the Australian House of Representatives, full preferential instant-runoff (preferential) voting is used to elect a single representative for an electorate. Voters are instructed to put a number in every square, and if they neglect to do so, their vote is informal. A substantial proportion of informal votes have a number 1, tick or cross in a single box.

In elections for the lower house of South Australian Parliament, the South Australian House of Assembly, the instructions on the ballot paper advise voters to complete every square. But there is a savings provision where one or some squares have been completed, but not all of them. Parties can submit preference tickets for each electorate to the Electoral Commission of South Australia. Where only one square has been completed indicating a vote for a particular party, that party's ticket is used instead of the vote becoming informal. Similarly, but much more rarely, if a voter completes several but not all squares, and their votes match those of a party's ticket, the ticket will be used to complete the remainder of the squares. [35] [36] [37]

It is illegal for parties to promote "Just Vote 1" or the like - the measure is only intended to avoid an informal vote where the voter's intention is clear.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Single transferable vote</span> Multi-winner electoral system

The single transferable vote (STV) or proportional-ranked choice voting (P-RCV), is a multi-winner electoral system in which each voter casts a single vote in the form of a ranked ballot. Voters have the option to rank candidates, and their vote may be transferred according to alternative preferences if their preferred candidate is eliminated or elected with surplus votes, so that their vote is used to elect someone they prefer over others in the running. STV aims to approach proportional representation based on votes cast in the district where it is used, so that each vote is worth about the same as another.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Australian Senate</span> Upper house of the Parliament of Australia

The Australian Senate is the upper house of the bicameral Parliament of Australia, the lower house being the House of Representatives.

The electoral system of Australia comprises the laws and processes used for the election of members of the Australian Parliament and is governed primarily by the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. The system presently has a number of distinctive features including compulsory enrolment; compulsory voting; majority-preferential instant-runoff voting in single-member seats to elect the lower house, the House of Representatives; and the use of the single transferable vote proportional representation system to elect the upper house, the Senate.

Electoral systems of the Australian states and territories are broadly similar to the electoral system used in federal elections in Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">South Australian Legislative Council</span> Upper house of the parliament in South Australia, Australia

The Legislative Council, or upper house, is one of the two chambers of the Parliament of South Australia. Its central purpose is to act as a house of review for legislation passed through the lower house, the House of Assembly. It sits in Parliament House in the state capital, Adelaide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Western Australian Legislative Council</span> Upper house of the legislature of Western Australia

The Western Australian Legislative Council is the upper house of the Parliament of Western Australia, a state of Australia. It is regarded as a house of review for legislation passed by the Legislative Assembly, the lower house. The two Houses of Parliament sit in Parliament House in the state capital, Perth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Donkey vote</span> Type of cast ballot in ranked voting in which candidates are ranked in order of appearance

In electoral systems which use ranked voting, a donkey vote is a cast ballot where the voter ranks the candidates based on the order they appear on the ballot itself. The voter that votes in this manner is referred to as a donkey voter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Optional preferential voting</span> Type of preferential voting system

One of the ways in which ranked voting systems vary is whether an individual vote must express a minimum number of preferences to avoid being considered invalid.

The Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 is an Act of the Australian Parliament which continues to be the core legislation governing the conduct of elections in Australia, having been amended on numerous occasions since 1918. The Act was introduced by the Nationalist Party of Billy Hughes, the main purpose of which was to replace first-past-the-post voting with instant-runoff voting for the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Labor Party opposed the introduction of preferential voting. The Act has been amended on several occasions since.

The Climate Change Coalition (CCC), briefly known as 4Change, was an Australian political party, which was formed in 2007 with a view to accelerate action by politicians from all parties on global warming and climate change. Its position on working towards addressing climate change stressed cooperation with big business in order to achieve significant progress on the issue. The party therefore advocated a close working relationship between environmentalists and the business community. The CCC was registered as a political party with the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) on 4 September 2007 and deregistered on 25 March 2010.

There are a number of complications and issues surrounding the application and use of single transferable vote proportional representation that form the basis of discussions between its advocates and detractors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">How-to-vote card</span> Handed-out leaflets in Australian elections with voting instructions

In Australia, how-to-vote cards (HTV) are small leaflets that are handed out by party supporters during elections. Voting in the Australian lower house uses a preferential voting system. Voters must rank every candidate on the ballot in order for their vote to count. There are often numerous candidates on the ballot, some with little public profile, so voters may find it difficult to decide on all of them. Parties produce how-to-vote cards ostensibly to help voters. They contain details about the candidate or party, as well as instruction on how to cast a ranked vote in the order that the party would prefer the voter follow. The flow of preferences can assist the party dispersing the cards directly and indirectly help allied parties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 Western Australian state election</span> Australian state election

The 2008 Western Australian state election was held on Saturday 6 September 2008 to elect 59 members to the Legislative Assembly and 36 members to the Legislative Council. The incumbent centre-left Labor Party government, in power since the 2001 election and led since 25 January 2006 by Premier Alan Carpenter, was defeated by the centre-right Liberal Party opposition, led by Opposition Leader Colin Barnett since 6 August 2008.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 Australian federal election</span> Election for the 45th Parliament of Australia

The 2016 Australian federal election was a double dissolution election held on Saturday 2 July to elect all 226 members of the 45th Parliament of Australia, after an extended eight-week official campaign period. It was the first double dissolution election since the 1987 election and the first under a new voting system for the Senate that replaced group voting tickets with optional preferential voting.

On 5 April 2014, an Australian Senate special election in Western Australia was held. The special election was held six months after the 2013 Australian federal election. The result of that 2013 election for the Australian Senate in Western Australia was voided on 20 February 2014 by the High Court of Australia, sitting as the Court of Disputed Returns, because 1,375 ballot papers were lost during an official recount in November 2013. The High Court ruled that because the number of lost ballots exceeded the margin for the two remaining Senate seats, the only acceptable remedy was to void the results and hold a special election.

The Minor Party Alliance (MPA) is a collaborative undertaking of small Australian political parties, created by Glenn Druery's "Independent Liaison" business, which assists in organising preference meetings and negotiating preference flows between minor parties in Australia. The aim of the Alliance is the election of Alliance candidates to Australian upper houses based upon the accumulation of their primary votes and the registered "above-the-line" party preferences to reach an electoral quota. For the Australian Senate, the quota for a half-Senate election in each State is normally 14.3%. The MPA effectively aims to "game" the electoral system, an act it believes to be justified, based upon their perception that the Australian electoral system is unfair and heavily biased against minor parties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 South Australian state election</span>

The 2018 South Australian state election to elect members to the 54th Parliament of South Australia was held on 17 March 2018. All 47 seats in the House of Assembly or lower house, whose members were elected at the 2014 election, and 11 of 22 seats in the Legislative Council or upper house, last filled at the 2010 election, were contested. The record-16-year-incumbent Australian Labor Party (SA) government led by Premier Jay Weatherill was seeking a fifth four-year term, but was defeated by the opposition Liberal Party of Australia (SA), led by Opposition Leader Steven Marshall. Nick Xenophon's new SA Best party unsuccessfully sought to obtain the balance of power.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flux (political party)</span> Political party in Australia

Flux, also known as Flux the System! and Liberals For Climate - The Flux Network, was a political party and movement that aimed to replace the world's elected legislatures with a new system known as issue-based direct democracy (IBDD). Flux originated in and was most active in Australia, but also had groups existing in the United States and Brazil.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hare–Clark electoral system</span> Proportional-representation voting system

Hare–Clark is a type of single transferable vote electoral system of proportional representation used for elections in Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory. It was one of the first uses of the Gregory method for transfers of winner's surplus votes.

Microparty, micro-party, or micro party is a term, sometimes pejorative, for a small political party that does not attract enough votes to be elected to a legislature in its own right. The term is most commonly used in Australia where the combination of single transferable vote and group voting tickets enabled microparties to direct preferences to each other, so that one of them could well be elected even when each party individually attracted very few primary votes.

References

  1. ↑ Farrell and McAllister, The Australian Electoral System, p. 61
  2. ↑ Ben Raue (11 March 2022). "Group voting tickets hold on in Victoria".
  3. ↑ "Progress of Bills: Constitutional and Electoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Equality) Bill 2021". parliament.wa.gov.au. Archived from the original on 2021-10-04. Retrieved 2021-10-04.
  4. 1 2 Antony Green (23 September 2015). "The Origin of Senate Group Ticket Voting, and it didn't come from the Major Parties". ABC. Retrieved 20 March 2016.
  5. ↑ "Western Australia enters era of electoral equality". Media Statements. Government of Western Australia. 2021-11-17. Archived from the original on 2021-12-09. Retrieved 2021-12-10.
  6. ↑ Farrell and McAllister, The Australian Electoral System, p. 61
  7. ↑ "The new Senate voting system and the 2016 election, Figure 3" (PDF). Parliament of Australia, Department of Parliamentary Services. 2018-01-25.
  8. ↑ "Legislative Council – SA 2014". The Tally Room. 26 January 2014. Retrieved 2019-04-11.
  9. ↑ "The history of the Council". Parliament of New South Wales. Retrieved 2019-04-28.
  10. ↑ Harry C.J. Phillips. Electoral Law in the State of Western Australia: An Overview (PDF) (Third ed.). Western Australian Electoral Commission. p. 68. Retrieved 2019-04-28.
  11. ↑ "Constitution (Proportional Representation) Bill" (PDF). Australasian Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 2022-03-20.
  12. ↑ "Electoral laws passed after marathon Parliament sitting: ABC 18 March 2016". ABC News. 2016-03-18. Retrieved 2019-04-11.
  13. ↑ Green, Antony (2013-06-19). "New Electoral System Adopted for the South Australian Legislative Council: Antony Green ABC 9 August 2017". Blogs.abc.net.au. Retrieved 2019-04-11.
  14. 1 2 "Media Statements - Electoral Equality Bill introduced into State Parliament". Archived from the original on 2021-10-03. Retrieved 2021-10-03.
  15. 1 2 "Legalise Cannabis and Daylight Saving parties elected to WA's Upper House on fraction of primary vote". ABC News. 2021-04-01. Retrieved 2022-05-09.
  16. 1 2 "'The system has significant flaws': WA electoral reform on the table despite campaign denial". ABC News. 2021-04-30. Retrieved 2022-05-09.
  17. ↑ Green, Antony. "WA Legislative Council Reform – The Problems of Ballot Paper Design and the Number of Preferences". Antony Green's Election Blog. Retrieved 2022-03-20.
  18. ↑ Antony Green (2009-06-16). Antony Green's Election Blog: NSW Legislative Council and its new electoral system. Retrieved on 2009-09-12.
  19. ↑ Bormann, Trevor (2013-09-05). "Bitter dispute erupts over Senate preferences in Queensland: ABC 5 September 2013". ABC News. Retrieved 2019-04-11.
  20. ↑ Glen Druery - the 'preference whisperer': ABC 21 August 2013 Archived 2 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  21. ↑ Bridie Jabour (13 September 2013). "'Preference whisperer' defends role in minor parties' Senate success: The Guardian 13 September 2013". Theguardian.com. Retrieved 2019-04-11.
  22. ↑ "Victorian 2013 Senate results and preference flows". ABC. Retrieved 2019-04-11.
  23. 1 2 "Motoring Enthusiasts Party member Ricky Muir wins Senate seat". ABC News. 2013-10-01. Retrieved 2019-04-11.
  24. ↑ Colebatch, Tim (2013-08-05). "A ballot crammed with choice". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2019-04-11.
  25. ↑ "Western Australia 2013 Senate results and preference flows". ABC. Retrieved 2019-04-11.
  26. ↑ Green, Antony (2013-09-13). "The Preference Deals behind the Strange Election of Ricky Muir and Wayne Dropulich". Blogs.abc.net.au. Retrieved 2019-04-11.
  27. ↑ "Australian Sports Party 'pleasantly surprised' by potential Senate seat". ABC News. 2013-09-09. Retrieved 2019-04-11.
  28. ↑ "South Australia 2013 Senate results and preference flows". ABC. Retrieved 2019-04-11.
  29. ↑ "Single-issue groups set to take balance of power". Canberra Times. 2013-09-09. Retrieved 2019-04-11.
  30. ↑ "Coalition shy of Senate majority". The Australian. Business Spectator. 2013-09-09. Retrieved 2019-04-11.
  31. ↑ "Tony Abbott fires a warning shot at micro parties in the Senate". WA Today. 2013-09-09. Retrieved 2019-04-11.
  32. ↑ "Xenophon wants voting reform: NineMSN 9 September 2013". Archived from the original on 17 January 2014. Retrieved 29 September 2013.
  33. ↑ Willingham, Richard (May 4, 2021). "Greens call for reform to Victoria's 'corrupt' Upper House voting system". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved June 7, 2021.
  34. ↑ "How the Liberals stopped No Mandatory Vaccination Winning a Seat in the WA Legislative Council – Antony Green's Election Blog" . Retrieved 2022-05-09.
  35. ↑ "Preferential Voting in Single Member Electorates - South Australia". Electoral Council of Australia and New Zealand. Retrieved 2022-05-16.
  36. ↑ "Electoral Act 1985" (PDF). South Australia Legislation. Section 60A: Parliament of South Australia. p. 6. Retrieved 2022-05-16.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  37. ↑ "Unique Features of South Australian Elections". ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 2022-05-16.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.