Ortotherium

Last updated • 11 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

Ortotherium
Temporal range: Late Miocene Huayquerian
~9–6.8  Ma
O
S
D
C
P
T
J
K
Pg
N
Ortotherium laticurvatum type MLP M 62.jpg
Illustration of the cast of the holotype dentary (MLP M 62).
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Pilosa
Family: Megalonychidae
Genus: Ortotherium
Ameghino, 1885
Species:
O. laticurvatum
Binomial name
Ortotherium laticurvatum
Ameghino, 1885
Synonyms
  • Menilaus affinisAmeghino, 1891
  • Ortotherium schlosseriAmeghino, 1891
  • Ortotherium seneumAmeghino, 1891
  • Amphiocnus seneum(Ameghino, 1891)
  • Ortotherium scrofumBordas, 1942

Ortotherium ("upright beast") is a genus of megalonychid ground sloth from the Late Miocene (Huayquerian SALMA, around 9 to 6.8 million years ago) Ituzaingó Formation of Entre Rios Province, Argentina. Although many species were described, the only valid species of the genus is Ortotherium laticurvatum, with many species being junior synonyms. Ortotherium is known from very fragmentary material, all of which is material from the mandible (lower jaw) and teeth. The holotype (specimen a scientific name is applied to) of O. laticurvatum consists of an incomplete left dentary that had been unearthed from a series of sediments known as ‘Conglomerado osifero’ in Paraná, Argentina. Argentina paleontologist Florentino Ameghino named the species in 1885, though he would go on to name four more, invalid, species of the genus. One species however, O. brevirostrum, has been reclassified as Mesopotamocnus .

Contents

Due to Ortotherium being known from very scant fossils, little is definitively known about the animal. However, much can be inferred based on related taxa. Ortotherium was average-sized for a Huayquerian megalonychid, being around 65 kg (143.3 lbs) using the similarly proportioned genus Eucholoeops . Ortotherium has a long mandible, with large, rectangular molars preceded by a giant caniniform. It had long, robust forelimbs terminating in a series of enlarged claws, using a mix of quadrupedal and bipedal movement, possibly permitting tree climbing. The hindlimbs were large and pillar-like supported by a lengthy tail.

Being a megalonychid, Ortotherium was a herbivorous mammal that likely consumed a large amount of leafy plant material. Their jaws and teeth were built for a shearing and cutting method of mastication, bearing sharp teeth and a wide array of jaw movement. The Ituzaingó Formation that Ortotherium inhabited was subtropical, with a mix of swampy woodlands and more open grasslands present. Fossils of mangroves indicate parts of the formation bore a shoreline marine ecosystem along the warm, salty waters of the Paranaense Sea. This allowed for a wide array of fauna to inhabit the area, which included many different genera of ground sloths, "native ungulates", and rodents, in addition to a menagerie of birds, including the large carnivorous "terror birds", as well as fish and reptiles.

History

Portrait of Florentino Ameghino, describer of Ortotherium. Florentino Ameghino 1878.jpg
Portrait of Florentino Ameghino, describer of Ortotherium.

The earliest published record of Ortotherium was in 1885, when a partial left dentary (lower jawbone) lacking preserved teeth that had been unearthed from the Upper Miocene strata of "Conglomerado osifero" (ossiferous conglomerate) near Paraná in Entre Rios Province, Argentina. It was described by prolific Argentine paleontologist Florentino Ameghino in his monograph on fossils from the area. [1] Ameghino named the type species Ortotherium laticurvatum, the specific name coming from the laterally curved lower jaw. [1] The holotype (name-bearing) specimen of O. laticurvatum has been lost, though a plaster cast exists in the Museo de La Plata. [2] Ameghino, mistakenly believed that the rock layers of Parana dated to the Oligocene, a much older epoch. [3] [1] Ameghino noted the large size of the molariform and caniniform cavities, believing that Ortotherium may be synonymous with the taxon Olygodon , which he had named on the basis of large molariforms. [4] [1] Ortotherium, however, is a distinct taxon that comes from different aged sediments. [4] O. laticurvatum was one of three species Ameghino named, fostering the novel species of O.schlosseri and O. seneum in an 1891 paper, both of which were also based on fragmented mandibular material. [5] Ameghino dubbed a new genus and species of ground sloth, Menilaus affinis, in the same 1891 work. M. affinis was named on the basis of another imperfect left mandible from "Conglomerado osifero". [6] [5] Menilaus has since been synonymized with Ortotherium laticurvatum, lacking any distinct traits that differ itself from the species. [7] [2]

Map of Argentina showing where all fossils of Ortotherium have been unearthed (marked by a star) Ortotherium distribution map.jpg
Map of Argentina showing where all fossils of Ortotherium have been unearthed (marked by a star)

Ameghino was a very active paleontologist, naming hundreds of new genera and species during his academic career in Argentina. [8] [9] Following his death in 1911, analysis of his taxa and scrutiny of his work came about. [10] [11] Lucas Kraglievich was one of these paleontologists, reclassifying O. seneum as a species of the other megalonychid Amphiocnus and considered Menilaus congeneric with Pliomorphus . [6] Later in 1942, paleontologist A. F. Bordas dubbed another two species of Ortotherium, the specimens composed of only mandible material. [12] [2] The species, O. brevirostrum and O. scrofum, though the latter is currently considered a synonym of O. laticurvatum. The 21st century saw extensive review of the genus and its many species by Diego Brandoni first in 2010 in which he did a full overview of all species. [2] In his 2010 review, he synonymized all of Ortotherium's species with the exception of O. brevirostrum which he noted likely belonged to a separate genus. [13] [7] [14] [2] Brandoni also described fossils of an indeterminate species, including a nearly complete left mandible that had a different placement of an opening in the mandibular canal (a ridge running along the sides of the mandible) compared to O. laticurvatum. [13] [2] However, this was not seen as enough to justify naming a novel species according to Brandoni. [2] Four years later, Brandoni erected the generic name Mesopotamocnus for O. brevirostrum, the name deriving from its geographic provenance in Mespotamia, Argentina and ocnus meaning "slowness", a commonly used root for the generic names of ground sloths. [15] [14]

Taxonomy

Life restoration of the related ground sloth Megalonyx. Megalonyx wheatleyi12.jpg
Life restoration of the related ground sloth Megalonyx .

Ortotherium was a megalonychid sloth, a family within the order Folivora which contains all of sloths. Megalonychids existed from the Deseadan SALMA (29–21 mya) to the Rancholabrean NALMA (240,000 BCE to 11,000 BCE), the last surviving genus being Megalonyx itself from North America. [16] Megalonychids were long-considered to be an extant group including the two-toed sloth genus Choeloepus , however analyses of the collagen and DNA of fossils of folivorans proved that Choloepus was instead related to Mylodontids, another family of ground sloths. Fossils of early megalonychids are rare, the oldest named being of the genus Deseadognathus from Argentina and Bolivia, [17] though even older fossils from the Early Oligocene have been tentatively reported from Puerto Rico. [18] The megalonychids later saw an explosion in diversity during the Middle-Upper Miocene in the Americas, primarily among the Santacrucian (17.5–16.3 mya) and Friasian (16.3–15.5) sites of Argentina, Uruguay, Venezuela, and Brazil. Extensive waterways formed in South America during this period, giving way to a more subtropical climate fostering a variety of flora and fauna to evolve in this environment. Megalonychids also expanded their range north, with genera like Zacatzontli from Mexico evolving on the North American continent prior to the development of the Isthmus of Panama. [19] Megalonychids had spread throughout the Caribbean and as far north as the Yukon Territory, Canada by their demise at the end of the Pleistocene, [20] though the closely related three-toed sloth Bradypus is extant. Research of evolutionary size trends suggests that in contrast to other ground sloth groups that grew over time, megalonychids did not exponentially increase in mass but instead varied greatly around the same amount until their extinction. [21] [22]

The following sloth family phylogenetic tree is based on collagen and mitochondrial DNA sequence data (see Fig. 4 of Presslee et al., 2019). [23]

Xenarthra

Cingulata (armadillos and allies)

Pilosa

Vermilingua (anteaters)

Folivora

Megalocnidae (Caribbean sloths)

Nothrotheriidae (ground sloths)

Megatheriidae (giant ground sloths)

Megalonychidae

Bradypodidae (three-toed sloths)

Scelidotheriidae (two-toed sloths)

("Edentata")  

The internal phylogeny of Megalonychidae, specifically taxa like Ortotherium, is tenuous as many taxa bear only fragmentary or incomplete specimens. This has caused Ortotherium, a genus known purely from partial mandibles and teeth, to be excluded from the majority of Megalonychid cladistic analyses. [24] [7] The only exception being by McDonald & Carranza-Castañeda (2017) in their description of Zacatzontli , a megalonychid from the Late Miocene of southern Mexico. [25] In their analysis, three separate clades related to biogeography were recovered, with a South American clade, including Ortotherium, Caribbean clade, and a North American clade. The Caribbean and North American taxa formed a separate subfamily from the South American, suggesting that the southern megalonychid branch broke off earlier in the Oligocene. [18] [25] When originally named by Ameghino in 1885, he did not specify the phylogenetic position of the genus besides Edentata, though he did state similarities to Bradypus and the nomen dubium Olygodon. Family-level assessment in 1942, Bordas believed that Ortotherium was part of the clade Nothrotheriinae, then believed to be within Megalonychidae. [2] As part of his review of the genus, Brandoni moved Ortotherium to an indeterminate position within Megalonychidae, though noted similarities to other Miocene megalonychids. [14] [26] [2]

The following cladistic diagram is adapted from McDonald & Caranza-Castañeda (2017), their description of Zacatzontli: [25]

Megalonychidae

Description

Although scant material is known, estimations of the mass and length of related genera of similar size and proportions have been made. Ortotherium was slightly larger than Eucholoeops and around the same size as Paranabradys. [14] [2] Eucholoeops was between 60 and 65 kg in weight, though some estimates reach 80 kg, giving an idea for the mass of Ortotherium. [27] [22] Megalonychids like Ortotherium were heavily built for their size, with large, plantigrade (flat-footed) hindlimbs that supported its large mass. It has been suggested that, with their long, stiff tails as support, megalonychids could reach a semi-erect position that could enable eating at greater heights. [28] The hands were tridactyl terminating in large claws, the namesake for the family, that had defensive as well as browsing capabilities. [28]

Mandibles and teeth

Reconstruction of the mandible based on the type cast (white) with teeth labeled. Ortotherium laticurvatum mandible recon labeled.jpg
Reconstruction of the mandible based on the type cast (white) with teeth labeled.

O. laticurvatum preserves a wide array of individual variation, with the size of teeth, mandible length, and height varying greatly. The proportions also fluctuate, causing many specimens to be misinterpreted previously as their own species. [7] [2] The mandible is exceptionally deep and robust compared to related taxa, with the largest specimen preserving a ramus that reaches 6 centimeters thick, though the size varies widely among individuals. [2] The ventral margin is convex, transversely and anterioposteriorily, creating the thickness and robusticity seen. An opening on the posterolateral face of the mandibular canal is on the coronoid process in O. laticurvatum, however specimen MACN Pv-8916 of Ortotherium sp. bears this opening anterior to the process. The anatomy of O. laticurvatum is more similar to genera like Megalonyx and Paranabradys in this aspect, suggesting that MACN Pv-8916 may be from a distinct species. [29] [30] [2] All megalonychids had hypsodont (high-crowned) teeth, as in the teeth of Ortotherium. The third molariform (cheek tooth) lines up with the anterior margin of the coronoid process, making the entire tooth visible in lateral (side) view. All megalonychids bear only four teeth on their lower jaws that is divided by a large diastema (toothless gap) between the caniniform and the first molar. [2] Caniniforms of Ortotherium are ovate with a posteromedial bulge, their position strongly protruding from the anterior end of the mandible. The tip of the mandible was U-shaped, with long and boxy sides composing the ramus. [2] Along the tooth row, alveoli are present along the mandibular near the molars, the first being triangular, second oval, and third suboval. [2]

The diagnostic traits (characteristics that distinguish a taxon from others) of the genus include: an anterior margin of coronoid process lateral to midpoint of the molariform 3 (molariform abbreviated as m), more anterior than in the fellow megalonychids Eucholoeops and Paranabradys, and more posterior than in Megalocnus, Megalonyx, and Pliometanastes. [31] [30] The posterior edge of mandibular symphysis inferomedial to the caniniform–m1 diastema; inferomedial to m1/m2 interval; inferomedial to the caniniforms. This is a combination of traits not present in other megalonychids, with taxa like Megalocnus preserving the former trait but lacking the latter two, giving credence to Ortotherium's independence as a genus. [2] Alveolus of the caniniforms are elliptical in cross-section and small relative to molariforms, in contrast to the larger molariforms of Megalonyx and Megalocnus. [30] The first molariform is subtrapezoidal in cross-section, while it is subrectangular in Megalonyx and Megalocnus. The m2 and m3 are oval in cross-section, a distinct trait compared to Megalonyx and Megalocnus. [32] [30] As in most genera in the megalonychid grade, the mandible has a diastema between the caniniforms and molar row, differing from Diabolotherium nordenskioldi in which it is absent. [33] [2] This unique combination of characteristics proves Ortotherium's validity. [34] [14] [26] [2]

Paleoenvironment

Life restoration of the "terror bird" Andalgalornis, which coexisted with Ortotherium. Andalgalornis jconway.png
Life restoration of the “terror bird Andalgalornis , which coexisted with Ortotherium.

Ortotherium is known from the Ituzaingó Formation, the fossils being deposited in a series of sediments made up of fine quartz gravel, clay, and chalcedony clasts called the "Conglomerado osifero". [35] The strata of the Ituzaingó Formation date to the Late Miocene, a period in which animal biodiversity boomed in South America, with the advent of the faunas of formations such as the Santa Cruz, Pebas, Cerro Azul, and Urumaco strata. [36] During the Late Miocene, water levels in South America rose and a selection of tropical habitats formed in large river basins such as the Pebas System and Paranese Sea, [37] the latter bordering the Ituzaingó Formation. [38] The Ituzaingó Formation's deposits are from the beaches of the Paranese Sea, [39] [40] transforming the environment into a subtropical one, as demonstrated by the strata's paleoflora and paleofauna. [41] [42] The paleoflora is diverse, but includes the aquatic mangroves and terrestrial legumes, [38] [43] bamboos, [44] flowering shrubs, [45] and more. Bamboos, coconut palms, and other palms were prevalent, being very common. [46] The Ituzaingó Formation also had savannahs in addition to the coastal, riverine, and tropical segments. [47] [43]

Image of Amazonian tidal mudflats, a similar environment to Ituzaingo. Pneumatoforos e Marismas - Praia do Belo.jpg
Image of Amazonian tidal mudflats, a similar environment to Ituzaingó.

The Ituzaingó Formation preserves vast tidal flats similar to those in the modern day Amazon and a warm climate. [48] Other ground sloths are endemic to the site such as the megalonychids Pliomorphus, Amphiocnus, and Mesopotamocnus , megatheriids Promegatherium [49] and Pyramiodontherium , [50] and mylodontids Octomylodon , Megabradys , and Promylodon . [51] [35] Notoungulate mammals in the Ituzaingó Formation were widespread, including the toxodontids Xotodon and Adinotherium , [52] and litopterns such as Brachytherium , Cullinia , Diadiaphorus, Neobrachytherium, Oxyodontherium, Paranauchenia, Promacrauchenia, Proterotherium and Scalabrinitherium. [53] Large, armored glyptodonts like Palaehoplophorus , Eleutherocercus , and Plohophorus [54] lived in the area as well as other cingulates like the pampatheres Kraglievichia [54] and Scirrotherium . [55] Carnivores included the phorusrhacids Devincenzia and Andalgalornis [56] and sparassodonts, [57] with giant crocodilians like Gryposuchus and Mourasuchus in the freshwater. [58] Ortotherium was likely a leaf-eater based on studies of megalonychid masticatory and dental morphology and capabilities, of which there was an abundance of greenery that could be comfortably chewed and digested. [27]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Megalonychidae</span> Extinct family of sloths

Megalonychidae is an extinct family of sloths including the extinct Megalonyx. Megalonychids first appeared in the early Oligocene, about 35 million years (Ma) ago, in southern Argentina (Patagonia). There is, however, one possible find dating to the Eocene, about 40 Ma ago, on Seymour Island in Antarctica. They first reached North America by island-hopping across the Central American Seaway, about 9 million years ago, prior to formation of the Isthmus of Panama about 2.7 million years ago. Some megalonychid lineages increased in size as time passed. The first species of these were small and may have been partly tree-dwelling, whereas the Pliocene species were already approximately half the size of the huge Late Pleistocene Megalonyx jeffersonii from the last ice age.

<i>Protypotherium</i> Extinct genus of notoungulates

Protypotherium is an extinct genus of notoungulate mammals native to South America during the Oligocene and Miocene epochs. A number of closely related animals date back further, to the Eocene. Fossils of Protypotherium have been found in the Deseadan Fray Bentos Formation of Uruguay, Muyu Huasi and Nazareno Formations of Bolivia, Cura-Mallín and Río Frías Formations of Chile, and Santa Cruz, Salicas, Ituzaingó, Aisol, Cerro Azul, Cerro Bandera, Cerro Boleadoras, Chichinales, Sarmiento and Collón Curá Formations of Argentina.

The Huayquerian age is a period of geologic time within the Late Miocene epoch of the Neogene, used more specifically within the SALMA classification. It follows the Chasicoan and precedes the Montehermosan age.

<i>Ahytherium</i> Extinct genus of sloths

Ahytherium is an extinct genus of megalonychid sloth that lived during the Pleistocene of what is now Brazil. It contains a single species, A. aureum.

The Ituzaingó Formation, in older literature also described as Entre Ríos or Entrerriana Formation, is an extensive geological formation of Late Miocene age in the Paraná Basin of the Corrientes, Santa Fe and Entre Ríos Provinces in Mesopotamia, northeastern Argentina. The formation comprises mudstones, cross-bedded sandstones and conglomerates deposited in a fluvio-deltaic environment and is renowned for the preservation of a rich fossil assemblage, including many mammals, birds, reptiles, fish, bivalves, foraminifera, ichnofossils and flora.

Brachytherium is an extinct genus of proterotheriid mammal from the Late Miocene to Late Pliocene of Argentina. It is represented by the type and only species B. cuspidatum, a taxon named in 1883 by Ameghino for a partial mandible with teeth. Though it was considered a dubious taxon at times, Brachytherium was revised as valid by Schmidt in 2015, who also synonymized the species Proterotherium gradatum and Lophogonodon paranensis, expanding the material known, all of which is from the Ituzaingó Formation. Some material previously referred to Brachytherium has been given the new name Neobrachytherium.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Megatheriinae</span> Extinct subfamily of mammals

Megatheriinae is a subfamily of the Megatheriidae, an extinct family of ground sloths that lived from the Middle Miocene to the Early Holocene.

Megathericulus is an extinct genus of ground sloths in the Megatheriidae family. It lived during the Middle Miocene, 11-16 Ma in what is now South America. Fossils have been found principally in Argentina, Bolivia, and Peru. It is a smaller representative of the megatheres. Despite being one of the earliest-known members of the family, its dentition structure is associated with homodont teeth belonging to the more modern line of evolution. The genus was scientifically named in 1904. Only one species is currently recognized, Megathericulus patagonicus.

Mcdonaldocnus is an extinct genus of nothrotheriid ground sloths that lived during the Middle Miocene and Early Pliocene of what is now Bolivia and Argentina. It was originally placed in the genus Xyophorus but was subsequently recognized as a distinct genus by Gaudin and colleagues in 2022. The authors reassigned the material of "Xyophorus" bondesioi, Xyophorusvillarroeli and Xyophorus sp. to Mcdonaldocnus. Fossils of Mcdonaldocnus have been found in the Cerro Azul Formation of Argentina.

Aymaratherium is an extinct genus of nothrotheriid ground sloths that lived during the Late Miocene and Early Pliocene of Bolivia. Fossils of Aymaratherium have been found in the Pomata Ayte locality of the Umala Formation.

<i>Kraglievichia</i> An extinct genus of mammals belonging to the armadillo order of xenarthrans

Kraglievichia is an extinct genus of cingulate belonging to the family Pampatheriidae. It lived from the Late Miocene to the Early Pliocene, and its fossilized remains were discovered in South America.

Proeuphractus is an extinct genus of xenarthran, related to the modern armadillos. It lived from the Early to the Late Miocene, and its fossilized remains were discovered in South America.

Palaehoplophorus is an extinct genus of glyptodont. It lived from the Middle to the Late Miocene, and its fossilized remains were discovered in South America.

Comaphorus is a dubious extinct genus of glyptodont. It lived during the Late Miocene in Argentina, but only one fossil has ever been referred to the animal.

Dasypus neogaeus is an extinct species of armadillo, belonging to the genus Dasypus, alongside the modern nine-banded armadillo. The only known fossil is a single osteoderm, though it has been lost, that was found in the Late Miocene strata of Argentina.

Caiman australis is an extinct species of caiman described in 1858 on the basis of a left maxilla that was collected from the Upper Miocene age Ituzaingó Formation of Entre Rios, Argentina.

Mesopotamocnus is an extinct genus of megalonychid ground sloth that lived during the Late Miocene in what is now Argentina. Fossils have been found in the Ituzaingó Formation of Argentina.

Bolivartherium is an extinct genus of mylodontine mylodontid sloth that lived during the Late Miocene and Late Pliocene in what is now Venezuela. Fossils have been found in the Codore and Urumaco Formations of Venezuela.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Santa Cruz Formation</span> Geological formation in Patagonia

The Santa Cruz Formation is a geological formation in the Magallanes/Austral Basin in southern Patagonia in Argentina and adjacent areas of Chile. It dates to the late Early Miocene epoch, and is contemporaneous with the eponymous Santacrucian age of the SALMA timescale. The Santa Cruz Formation is known for its abundance of vertebrate fossils, including South American native ungulates, as well as rodents, xenarthrans, and metatherians.

<i>Eucholoeops</i> Extinct genus of sloth

Eucholoeops is a genus of megalonychid ground sloth that lived in southernmost Argentina. Fossils have been recovered from the lower Santa Cruz Formation of Patagonia, which has been dated to the Early Miocene. The type species, E. ingens, was named by Florentino Ameghino in 1887 based on skull fossils, encased in geological matrix, from the collection of his brother. These remains were never removed from the matrix, and have since been lost. Florentino Ameghino went on to name five more species if Eucholoeops, and another palaeontologist, Aldice Mercerat, named two more. All are now believed to represent the same taxon as E. ingens, and the lost type specimen has been replaced with a neotype lower jaw.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Ameghino, Florentino (1885). "Nuevos restos de mamíferos fósiles oligocenos, recogidos por el profesor Pedro Scalabrini y pertenecientes al Museo Provincial de la Ciudad del Paraná". Boletin de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias en Córdoba, República Argentina. 8.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Brandoni, Diego (2010-05-18). "On the systematics of Ortotherium Ameghino (Xenarthra, Tardigrada, Megalonychidae) from the 'Conglomerado osífero' (late Miocene) of Argentina". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 30 (3): 975–980. Bibcode:2010JVPal..30..975B. doi:10.1080/02724631003763474. hdl: 11336/79980 . ISSN   0272-4634. S2CID   84723592.
  3. Torra, R. (1999). Ituzaingó Formation. A key for the interpretation of upper tertiary stratigraphy, Mesopotamia-Chaco Paraná Basin, Argentina. Ciência e Natura, 139–168.
  4. 1 2 Ameghino, F. (1883). Sobre una colección de mamíferos fósiles del Piso Mesopotámico de la formación patagónica: recogidos en las barrancas del Paraná por el Profesor Pedro Scalabrini/por Florentino Ameghino.
  5. 1 2 Ameghino, Florentino (1891). "Caracteres diagnósticos de cincuenta especies nuevas de mamíferos fósiles argentinos". Revista Argentina de Historia Natural, 1. 3: 129–167.
  6. 1 2 Kraglievich, L. (1923). Un probable descendiente directo del género Hapalops del Oligoceno de Patagonia en la fauna miocena de Entre Ríos. Neohapalops rothi, 9–16.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Brandoni, Diego (2011-01-01). "The Megalonychidae (Xenarthra, Tardigrada) from the late Miocene of Entre Ríos Province, Argentina, with remarks on their systematics and biogeography". Geobios. 44 (1): 33–44. Bibcode:2011Geobi..44...33B. doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2010.06.005. hdl: 11336/79978 . ISSN   0016-6995.
  8. Bargo, M. Susana; Iuliis, Gerardo De; Toledo, Néstor (2019-12-20). "EARLY MIOCENE SLOTHS (XENARTHRA, FOLIVORA) FROM THE RÍO SANTA CRUZ VALLEY (SOUTHERN PATAGONIA, ARGENTINA). AMEGHINO, 1887 REVISITED". Publicación Electrónica de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina. 19 (2). doi:10.5710/PEAPA.06.08.2019.297. hdl: 11336/126223 . ISSN   2469-0228. S2CID   214090853.
  9. Fernicola, J. C. (2011). 1886-1888: Ascenso, auge y caída de la sociedad entre Florentino Ameghino y Francisco P. Moreno.
  10. Podgorny, Irina (2005). "Bones and Devices in the Constitution of Paleontology in Argentina at the End of the Nineteenth Century". Science in Context. 18 (2): 249–283. doi:10.1017/S0269889705000475. ISSN   1474-0664. S2CID   145642315.
  11. Morrone, J. J. (2011). La teoría biogeográfica de Florentino Ameghino y el carácter episódico de la evolución geobiótica de los mamíferos terrestres de América del Sur. Vida y obra de Florentino Ameghino (Fernícola, JC; Prieto, AR; Lazo, DG, 81–89.
  12. Bordas, A. F. (1942). Observaciones sobre algunos Nothrotheriinae (Gravigrada). Physis, 19(52), 173–179.
  13. 1 2 Brandoni, D. (2008). Nuevos materiales de Ortotheriinae (Xenarthra, Tardigrada, Megalonychidae) procedentes del" Mesopotamiense"(Mioceno tardío) de Entre Ríos.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 Brandoni, D. (2014). A new genus of Megalonychidae (Mammalia, Xenarthra) from the late Miocene of Argentina. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia, 17, 33–42.
  15. McAfee, Robert; Beery, Sophia; Rimoli, Renato; Almonte, Juan; Lehman, Phillip; Cooke, Siobhan (2021-08-31). "New species of the ground sloth Parocnus from the late Pleistocene-early Holocene of Hispaniola". Vertebrate Anatomy Morphology Palaeontology. 9 (1). doi: 10.18435/vamp29369 . ISSN   2292-1389. S2CID   239668779.
  16. McDonald, H. Gregory; Stafford, Thomas W.; Gnidovec, Dale M. (2015). "Youngest Radiocarbon Age for Jefferson's Ground Sloth, Megalonyx Jeffersonii (Xenarthra, Megalonychidae)". Quaternary Research. 83 (2): 355–359. Bibcode:2015QuRes..83..355G. doi:10.1016/j.yqres.2014.11.006. ISSN   0033-5894. S2CID   129016865.
  17. Carlini, A. A., & Scillato-Vane, G. J. (2004). The oldest Megalonychidae (Xenarthra: Tardigrada); phylogenetic relationships and an emended diagnosis of the family. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie-Abhandlungen, 423–443.
  18. 1 2 MacPhee, R. D. E., & Iturralde-Vinent, M. (1995). Origin of the Greater Antillean land mammal fauna. 1, New Tertiary fossils from Cuba and Puerto Rico. American Museum novitates; no. 3141.
  19. Stinnesbeck, Sarah R.; Frey, Eberhard; Olguín, Jerónimo Avíles; Stinnesbeck, Wolfgang; Zell, Patrick; Mallison, Heinrich; González González, Arturo; Aceves Núñez, Eugenio; Velázquez Morlet, Adriana; Terrazas Mata, Alejandro; Benavente Sanvicente, Martha; Hering, Fabio; Rojas Sandoval, Carmen (2017). "Xibalbaonyx oviceps, a new megalonychid ground sloth (Folivora, Xenarthra) from the Late Pleistocene of the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico, and its paleobiogeographic significance". PalZ. 91 (2): 245–271. Bibcode:2017PalZ...91..245S. doi:10.1007/s12542-017-0349-5. ISSN   0031-0220. S2CID   134188352.
  20. McDonald, H. G., Harington, C. R., & De Iuliis, G. (2000). The ground sloth Megalonyx from Pleistocene deposits of the Old Crow Basin, Yukon, Canada. Arctic, 213–220.
  21. Toledo, N.; Bargo, M. S.; Vizcaíno, S. F.; Iuliis, G. De; Pujos, F. (2015). "Evolution of body size in anteaters and sloths (Xenarthra, Pilosa): phylogeny, metabolism, diet and substrate preferences". Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 106 (4): 289–301. Bibcode:2015EESTR.106..289T. doi: 10.1017/S1755691016000177 . hdl: 11336/56403 . ISSN   1755-6910. S2CID   90400372.
  22. 1 2 Toledo, Néstor (2012-09-07). "Mass estimation of Santacrucian sloths from the Early Miocene Santa Cruz Formation of Patagonia, Argentina". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. doi: 10.4202/app.2012.0009 . hdl: 11336/20506 . ISSN   0567-7920. S2CID   59153129.
  23. Presslee, Samantha; Slater, Graham J.; Pujos, François; Forasiepi, Analía M.; Fischer, Roman; Molloy, Kelly; Mackie, Meaghan; Olsen, Jesper V.; Kramarz, Alejandro; Taglioretti, Matías; Scaglia, Fernando; Lezcano, Maximiliano; Lanata, José Luis; Southon, John; Feranec, Robert (2019). "Palaeoproteomics resolves sloth relationships". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 3 (7): 1121–1130. Bibcode:2019NatEE...3.1121P. doi:10.1038/s41559-019-0909-z. ISSN   2397-334X. PMID   31171860. S2CID   256726789.
  24. Varela, L., Tambusso, P. S., McDonald, H. G., & Fariña, R. A. (2019). Phylogeny, macroevolutionary trends and historical biogeography of sloths: insights from a Bayesian morphological clock analysis. Systematic Biology, 68(2), 204–218.
  25. 1 2 3 McDonald, H. Gregory; Carranza-Castañeda, Oscar (2017). "Increased xenarthran diversity of the Great American Biotic Interchange: a new genus and species of ground sloth (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Megalonychidae) from the Hemphillian (late Miocene) of Jalisco, Mexico". Journal of Paleontology. 91 (5): 1069–1082. Bibcode:2017JPal...91.1069M. doi: 10.1017/jpa.2017.45 . ISSN   0022-3360. S2CID   133770632.
  26. 1 2 Brandoni, D., Scillato Yané, G. J., Miño Boilini, Á. R., & Favotti, S. E. (2016). Los Tardigrada (Mammalia, Xenarthra) de Argentina: diversidad, evolución y biogeografía. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia"
  27. 1 2 Bargo, M. Susana; Vizcaíno, Sergio F.; Kay, Richard F. (2009-09-12). "Predominance of orthal masticatory movements in the Early Miocene Eucholaeops (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Tardigrada, Megalonychidae) and other megatherioid sloths". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 29 (3): 870–880. Bibcode:2009JVPal..29..870B. doi:10.1671/039.029.0324. ISSN   0272-4634. S2CID   86087018.
  28. 1 2 Semken, Holmes A.; Gregory McDonald, H.; Graham, Russell W.; Adrain, Tiffany; Artz, Joe Alan; Baker, Richard G.; Bryk, Alexander B.; Brenzel, David J.; Arthur Bettis, E.; Clack, Andrew A.; Grimm, Brittany L.; Haj, Adel; Horgen, Sarah E.; Mahoney, Meghann C.; Ray, Harold A. (2022-06-30). "Paleobiology of Jefferson's Ground Sloth (Megalonyx jeffersonii) derived from three contemporaneous, ontogenetically distinct individuals recovered from Southwestern Iowa, U.S.A." Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 42 (1): e2124115. Bibcode:2022JVPal..42E4115S. doi: 10.1080/02724634.2022.2124115 . ISSN   0272-4634. S2CID   253258474.
  29. Scillato-Yane, G. (2013). Nuevo Megalonychidae (Edentata, Tardigrada) del "Mesopotamiense" (Mioceno, Tardioplioceo) de la Provincia de Entre Rios. Ameghiniana, 17(3), 193–199.
  30. 1 2 3 4 Stock, C. (1925). Cenozoic gravigrade edentates of Western North America: with special reference to the Pleistocene Megalonychinae and Mylodontidae of Rancho La Brea (No. 331). Carnegie Institution of Washington.
  31. Hirschfeld, S. E., Webb, S. D., & Webb, S. D. (1968). Plio-Pleistocene megalonychid sloths of North America: Bulletin of the Florida State Museum.
  32. Matthew, W. D., Couto, C. D. P., & Simpson, G. G. (1959). The Cuban edentates. Bulletin of the AMNH; v. 117, article 1.
  33. Pujos, F., De Iuliis, G., Argot, C., & Werdelin, L. (2007). A peculiar climbing Megalonychidae from the Pleistocene of Peru and its implication for sloth history. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 149(2), 179–235.
  34. Brandoni, D. (2013). Los mamíferos continentales del “Mesopotamiense”(Mioceno tardío) de Entre Ríos, Argentina. Diversidad, edad y paleobiogeografía. Publicación Electrónica de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, 14(1).
  35. 1 2 Cione, A. L., Azpelicueta, M. D. L. M., Bond, M., Carlini, A. A., Casciotta, J. R., Cozzuol, M. A., ... & Vucetich, M. G. (2000). Miocene vertebrates from Entre Ríos province, eastern Argentina. El Neógeno de Argentina. Serie Correlación Geológica, 14, 191–237.
  36. Wesselingh, F., & Salo, J. A. (2006). A Miocene perspective on the evolution of the Amazonian biota. Scripta Geologica, 133, 439–458.
  37. Hoorn, C., Boschman, L. M., Kukla, T., Sciumbata, M., & Val, P. (2022). The Miocene wetland of western Amazonia and its role in Neotropical biogeography. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 199(1), 25–35.
  38. 1 2 Brea, Mariana; Zucol, Alejandro F.; Franco, María Jimena (2013-05-15). "A new Bambusoideae (Poaceae: Bambusoideae: Bambuseae: Guaduinae) from the Ituzaingó Formation (Pliocene–Pleistocene), Entre Ríos, Argentina". Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 192: 1–9. Bibcode:2013RPaPa.192....1B. doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2012.12.006. hdl: 11336/78560 . ISSN   0034-6667.
  39. Aceñolaza, F. G. (2000). La Formación Paraná (Mioceno medio): estratigrafía, distribución regional y unidades equivalentes. El Neógeno de Argentina. Serie Correlación Geológica, 14, 9–28.
  40. Candela, Adriana M.; Bonini, Ricardo A.; Noriega, Jorge I. (2012-11-01). "First continental vertebrates from the marine Paraná Formation (Late Miocene, Mesopotamia, Argentina): Chronology, biogeography, and paleoenvironments". Geobios. 45 (6): 515–526. Bibcode:2012Geobi..45..515C. doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2012.05.003. ISSN   0016-6995. S2CID   128431992.
  41. Franco, M. J., & Brea, M. (2010). Microlobiusxylon paranaensis gen. et sp. nov.(Fabaceae, Mimosoideae) from the Pliocene-Pleistocene of Ituzaingó formation, Paraná basin, Argentina.
  42. Gutstein, C. S., Cozzuol, M. A., & Pyenson, N. D. (2014). The antiquity of riverine adaptations in Iniidae (Cetacea, Odontoceti) documented by a humerus from the late Miocene of the Ituzaingó Formation, Argentina. The Anatomical Record, 297(6), 1096–1102.
  43. 1 2 Moya, Eliana; Brea, Mariana (2020-10-01). "Combretaceous fossil wood from Ituzaingó Formation (Late Miocene?), Argentina, indicate a coastal marine environment". Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 281: 104270. Bibcode:2020RPaPa.28104270M. doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2020.104270. hdl: 11336/142562 . ISSN   0034-6667. S2CID   224947789.
  44. Brea, M., & Zucol, A. F. (2007). Guadua zuloagae sp. nov., the first petrified bamboo culm record from the Ituzaingó Formation (Pliocene), Paraná Basin, Argentina. Annals of Botany, 100(4), 711–723.
  45. Franco, María Jimena (2018-07-04). "Small Celastraceae and Polygonaceae twigs from the Upper Cenozoic (Ituzaingó Formation) of the La Plata Basin, Argentina". Historical Biology. 30 (5): 646–660. Bibcode:2018HBio...30..646F. doi:10.1080/08912963.2017.1313840. hdl: 11336/21859 . ISSN   0891-2963. S2CID   133509866.
  46. Franco, M. J., & Brea, M. (2015). First extra-Patagonian record of Podocarpaceae fossil wood in the Upper Cenozoic (Ituzaingó Formation) of Argentina. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 53(2), 103–116.
  47. Tambussi, C. P., Degrange, F., Tambussi, C. P., & Degrange, F. J. (2013). Neogene Birds of South America. South American and Antarctic Continental Cenozoic Birds: Paleobiogeographic Affinities and Disparities, 59–86.
  48. Cione, A. L., Dahdul, W. M., Lundberg, J. G., & Machado-Allison, A. (2009). Megapiranha paranensis, a new genus and species of Serrasalmidae (Characiformes, Teleostei) from the upper Miocene of Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 29(2), 350–358.
  49. Brandoni, D. (2005). Los Megatheriinae (Xenarthra, Tardigrada) de la Formación Ituzaingó (Mioceno Superior-Plioceno) de la provincia de Entre Ríos.
  50. Brandoni, D., & Carlini, A. A. (2009). On the presence of Pyramiodontherium (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Megatheriidae) in the late Miocene of northeastern Argentina and its biogeographical implications. Revista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 115.
  51. Scillato-Yané, G. J. (1981). Nuevo Mylodontinae (Edentata, Tardigrada) del" Mesopotamiense" de la Provincia de Entre Ríos. Ameghiniana, 18(1–2), 29–34.
  52. Schmidt, G. I. (2013). Los ungulados nativos (Litopterna y Notoungulata: Mammalia) del “Mesopotamiense”(Mioceno Tardío) de Entre Ríos, Argentina. Publicación Electrónica de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, 14(1).
  53. Schmidt, G. I. (2013). Litopterna y Notoungulata (Mammalia) de la Formación Ituzaingó (Mioceno tardío-Plioceno) de la Provincia de Entre Ríos: sistemática, bioestratigrafía y paleobiogeografía (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Nacional de La Plata).
  54. 1 2 Scillato, G. J. (2013). Los Cingulata (Mammalia, Xenarthra) del “Conglomerado Osífero”(Mioceno tardío) de la Formación Ituzaingó de Entre Ríos, Argentina. Publicación Electrónica de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, 14(1).
  55. Góis, Flávio; Scillato-Yané, Gustavo Juan; Carlini, Alfredo Armando; Guilherme, Edson (2013-06-01). "A new species of Scirrotherium Edmund & Theodor, 1997 (Xenarthra, Cingulata, Pampatheriidae) from the late Miocene of South America". Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology. 37 (2): 177–188. Bibcode:2013Alch...37..177G. doi:10.1080/03115518.2013.733510. hdl: 11336/18791 . ISSN   0311-5518. S2CID   129039539.
  56. Alvarenga, Herculano M.F.; Höfling, Elizabeth (2003). "Systematic revision of the Phorusrhacidae (Aves: Ralliformes)". Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia. 43 (4). doi: 10.1590/S0031-10492003000400001 . ISSN   0031-1049.
  57. Babot, J. M., & Ortiz, P. E. (2009). Primer registro de Borhyaenoidea (Mammalia, Metatheria, Sparassodonta) en la provincia de Tucumán (Formación India Muerta, Grupo Choromoro; Mioceno tardío). Acta Geológica Lilloana, 34–48.
  58. Riff, D., Romano, P. S. R., Oliveira, G. R., & Aguilera, O. A. (2010). Neogene crocodile and turtle fauna in northern South America. Amazonia. Landscapes and Species Evolution: A Look Into the Past, 259–280.