A parenting style is a pattern of behaviors, attitudes, and approaches that a parent uses when interacting with and raising their child. The study of parenting styles is based on the idea that parents differ in their patterns of parenting and that these patterns can have a significant impact on their children's development and well-being. Parenting styles are distinct from specific parenting practices, since they represent broader patterns of practices and attitudes that create an emotional climate for the child.[1] Parenting styles also encompass the ways in which parents respond to and make demands on their children.
Children go through many different stages throughout their childhood. Parents create their own parenting styles from a combination of factors that evolve over time. The parenting styles are subject to change as children begin to develop their own personalities. During the stage of infancy, parents try to adjust to a new lifestyle in terms of adapting and bonding with their new infant. Developmental psychologists distinguish between the relationship between the child and parent, which ideally is one of attachment, and the relationship between the parent and child, referred to as bonding. In the stage of adolescence, parents encounter new challenges, such as adolescents seeking and desiring freedom.[2]
Mother holding an infant child
A child's temperament and parents' cultural patterns have an influence on the kind of parenting style a child may receive.[3] The parenting styles that parents experience as children also influences the parenting styles they choose to use.[4]
Early researchers studied parenting along a range of dimensions, including levels of responsiveness, democracy, emotional involvement, control, acceptance, dominance, and restrictiveness.[1] In the 1960s, Diana Baumrind created a typology of three parenting styles, which she labeled as authoritative, authoritarian and permissive (or indulgent).[5] She characterized the authoritative style as an ideal balance of control and autonomy.[6] This typology became the dominant classification of parenting styles, often with the addition of a fourth category of indifferent or neglectful parents.[5] Baumrind's typology has been criticized as containing overly broad categorizations and an imprecise and overly idealized description of authoritative parenting.[7] Later researchers on parenting styles returned to focus on parenting dimensions and emphasized the situational nature of parenting decisions.[7][8]
Some early researchers found that children raised in a democratic home environment were more likely to be aggressive and exhibit leadership skills while those raised in a controlled environment were more likely to be quiet and non-resistant.[9] Contemporary researchers have emphasized that love and nurturing children with care and affection encourages positive physical and mental progress in children.[10] They have also argued that additional developmental skills result from positive parenting styles, including maintaining a close relationship with others, being self-reliant, and being independent.
Distinction with parenting practices
Father and children reading
According to a literature review by Christopher Spera (2005), Darling and Steinberg (1993) suggest that it is important to better understand the differences between parenting styles and parenting practices: "Parenting practices are defined as specific behaviors that parents use to socialize their children", while parenting style is "the emotional climate in which parents raise their children."[1] Others such as Lamborn and Dornbusch Darling and Steinberg assisted in the research focusing on impacts of parenting practices on adolescence achievement.[11]
One study association that has been made is the difference between "child's outcome and continuous measures of parental behavior." Some of the associations listed include: Support, Engagement, Warmth, Recognition, Control, Monitoring, and Severe punishment.[12][13] Parenting practices such as parental support, supervision and strict boundaries appear to be associated with higher school grades, fewer behavioral problems and better mental health.[14] These components have no age limit and can start in preschool all the way through college.[15]
Theories of child rearing
Beginning in the 17th century, two philosophers independently wrote works that have been widely influential in child-rearing. John Locke's 1693 book Some Thoughts Concerning Education is a well-known foundation for educational pedagogy from a Puritan standpoint. Locke highlights the importance of experiences to a child's development and recommends developing their physical habits first. In 1762, the French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau published a volume on education, Emile: or, On Education.[16] He proposed that early education should be derived less from books and more from a child's interactions with the world. Among them, Rousseau is more in line with slow parenting, and Locke is more for concerted cultivation.[17]
Jean Piaget
Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development describes how children represent and reason about the world.[18] This is a developmental stage theory that consists of a Sensorimotor stage, Preoperational stage, Concrete operational stage, and Formal operational stage. Piaget was a pioneer in the field of child development and psychology and continues to influence parents, educators and other theorists with a significant effect on science.[19]
Erik Erikson, a developmental psychologist, proposed eight life stages through which each person must develop. In order to move through the eight stages, there is a crisis that must occur. Then there is a new dilemma that encourages the growth through the next stage.[20][21] In each stage, they must understand and balance two conflicting forces, and so parents might choose a series of parenting styles that helps each child as appropriate at each stage. The first five of his eight stages occur in childhood: The virtue of hope requires balancing trust with mistrust, and typically occurs from birth to one year old. Will balances autonomy with shame and doubt around the ages of two to three. Purpose balances initiative with guilt around the ages of four to six years. Competence balances industry against inferiority around ages seven to 12. Fidelity contrasts identity with role confusion, in ages 13 to 19. The remaining adult virtues are love, care and wisdom.[22]
Rudolf Dreikurs believed that pre-adolescent children's misbehavior was caused by their unfulfilled wish to be a member of a social group. He argued that they then act out a sequence of four mistaken goals: first they seek attention. If they do not get it, they aim for power, then revenge and finally feel inadequate. This theory is used in education as well as parenting, forming a valuable theory upon which to manage misbehavior.[23] Other parenting techniques should also be used to encourage learning and happiness. He emphasized the significance to establish a democratic family style that adopts a method of periodic democratic family councils while averting punishment.[24] He advances "logical and natural consequences" that teach children to be responsible and understand the natural consequences of proper rules of conduct and improper behavior.[25]
Frank Furedi is a sociologist with a particular interest in parenting and families. He believes that the actions of parents are less decisive than others claim. He describes the term infant determinism[26] as the determination of a person's life prospects by what happens to them during infancy, arguing that there is little or no evidence for its truth. While commercial, governmental and other interests constantly try to guide parents to do more and worry more for their children, he believes that children are capable of developing well in almost any circumstances. Furedi quotes Steve Petersen of Washington University in St. Louis: "development really wants to happen. A very poor environment is needed to interfere with development... [just] do not raise your child in a closet, starve them, or hit them on the head with a frying pan".[27] Similarly, the journalist Tim Gill has expressed concern about excessive risk aversion by parents and those responsible for children in his book No Fear.[28] This aversion limits the opportunities for children to develop sufficient adult skills, particularly in dealing with risk, but also in performing adventurous and imaginative activities.[29]
In 1998, independent scholar Judith Rich Harris published The Nurture Assumption, in which she argued that scientific evidence, especially behavioral genetics, showed that all different forms of parenting do not have significant effects on children's development, short of cases of severe child abuse or child neglect.[30] She proposes two main points for the effects: genetic effects, and social effects involved by the peer groups in which children participate.[31] The purported effects of different forms of parenting are all illusions caused by heredity, the culture at large, and children's own influence on how their parents treat them.[32] However, Harris was criticized for exaggerating the point of "parental upbringing seems to matter less than previously thought" to the implication that "parents do not matter."[33]
Moreover, recent studies suggest that parents can influence the outcomes of their children, it has been suggested that the personality traits of parents are better predictors for the outcomes of their children than those of the children,[34] and some recent studies have shown that parenting does have impacts on adoptive children as well. For example, it has been shown that warm adoptive parenting reduces internalizing and externalizing problems of the adoptive children over time.[35] Another study shows that warm adoptive parenting at 27 months predicted lower levels of child externalizing problems at ages 6 and 7.[36]
Baumrind's parenting typology
Diana Baumrind is a researcher who focused on the classification of parenting styles into what is now known as Baumrind’s parenting typology. In her research, she found what she considered to be the four basic elements that could help shape successful parenting: responsiveness vs. unresponsiveness and demanding vs. undemanding.[37] Parental responsiveness refers to the degree to which the parent responds to the child's needs in a supportive and accepting manner.[38][39][40][41] Parental demandingness refers to the rules which the parent has in place for their child's behavior, the expectations for their children to comply with these rules, and the level of repercussions that follow if those rules are broken.[42] Through her studies Baumrind identified three initial parenting styles: Authoritative parenting, authoritarian parenting and permissive parenting. Maccoby and Martin expanded upon Baumrind's three original parenting styles by placing parenting styles into two distinct categories: demanding and undemanding.[43] With these distinctions, four new parenting styles were defined:
Maccoby and Martin's Four Parenting Styles Baumrind's Three Parenting Styles
Demanding
Undemanding
Responsive
Authoritative/Propagative
Indulgent (Permissive)
Unresponsive
Authoritarian/Totalitarian
Neglectful
Baumrind believes that parents should be neither punishing nor apathetic.[44] Instead, they should make rules for their children and be affectionate with them. These parenting styles are designed to describe normal changes in parenting, rather than abnormal parenting, such as might be observed in abusive families.[45] In addition, parenting stress can often cause changes in parental behavior such as inconsistency, increased negative communication, decreased monitoring and/or supervision,[46] setting vague rules or limits on behavior, being more reactive and less proactive, and engaging in increasingly harsh disciplinary behaviors.
Chandler, Heffer, and Turner argue that parenting styles are associated with adolescent psychological and behavioral problems and may affect academic performance.[47]
The four styles
The four styles include Authoritative, Authoritarian, Neglectful, and Indulgent/Permissive.[48] Each style has been explained based on the definition and is elaborated considering demandingness and responsiveness.
The parent is demanding and responsive. When this style is systematically developed, it grows to fit the descriptions propagative parenting, democratic parenting, positive parenting and concerted cultivation.
Authoritative parenting is characterized by a child-centered approach that holds high expectations of maturity. Authoritative parents can understand how their children are feeling and teach them how to regulate their feelings. Even with high expectations of maturity, authoritative parents are usually forgiving of any possible shortcomings.[49] They often help their children to find appropriate outlets to solve problems. Authoritative parents encourage children to be independent but still place limits on their actions.[44] Extensive verbal give-and-take is not refused, and parents try to be warm and nurturing toward the child.[44] Authoritative parents are not usually as controlling as authoritarian parents, allowing the child to explore more freely, thus having them make their own decisions based upon their own reasoning. Often, authoritative parents produce children who are more independent and self-reliant.[50] Authoritative parenting styles are mainly produced in the context of high parental responses and high demands.[51]
Authoritative parents will set clear standards for their children, monitor the limits that they set, and also allow children to develop autonomy. They also expect mature, independent, and age-appropriate behavior of children. Punishments for misbehavior are measured and consistent, not arbitrary or violent. Often behaviors are not punished but the natural consequences of the child's actions are explored and discussed—allowing the child to see that the behavior is inappropriate and not to be repeated, rather than not repeated to merely avoid adverse consequences.[44] Authoritative parents set limits and demand maturity, and when punishing a child, authoritative parents are more likely to explain their reason for punishment.[52] In some cases, this may lead to more understanding and complying behavior from the child.[52] A child knows why they are being punished because an authoritative parent makes the reasons known. As a result, children of authoritative parents are more likely to be successful, well-liked by those around them, generous and capable of self-determination.[53]
Authoritarian parenting is a restrictive, punishment-heavy parenting style in which parents make their children follow their directions with little to no explanation or feedback and focus on the child's and family's perception and status.[44][51]Corporal punishment, such as spanking, and yelling are a form of discipline often preferred by authoritarian parents. The goal of this style, at least when well-intentioned, is to teach the child to behave, survive, and thrive as an adult in a harsh and unforgiving society by preparing the child for negative responses such as anger and aggression that the child will face if their behavior is inappropriate. In addition, advocates of the authoritarian style often believe that the shock of aggression from someone from the outside world will affect children less because they are accustomed to both acute and chronic stress imposed by parents.[54]
Authoritarian parenting has distinctive effects on children:
Children raised using this type of parenting may have less social competence because the parent generally tells the child what to do instead of allowing the child to choose by itsself, making the child appear to excel in the short term but limiting development in ways that are increasingly revealed as supervision and opportunities for direct parental control decline.[55]
Children raised by authoritarian parents tend to be conformist, highly obedient, quiet, and not very happy.[56] These children often experience depression and self-blame.[56]
For some children raised by authoritarian parents, these behaviors continue into adulthood.[56]
Children who are resentful of or angry about being raised in an authoritarian environment but have managed to develop high behavioral self-confidence often rebel in adolescence and/or young adulthood.[56]
Many Non-Western parents tend to have more of an Authoritarian parenting style rather than Authoritative because adult figures are generally more highly respected in other countries. Children are expected to comply with their parents rules without question. This is a common critique of Baumrind's Three Parenting Styles because Authoritarian parenting is generally associated with negative outcomes, however, many other cultures are considered to use an Authoritarian parenting style, and it is considered in those cultures not to negatively affect the child.[52]
Indulgent or permissive
The parent is responsive but not demanding.
Indulgent parenting, also called permissive, non-directive, lenient, libertarian,[58] or (by supporters) anti-authoritarian,[59] is characterized as having few behavioral expectations for the child. "Indulgent parenting is a style of parenting in which parents are very involved with their children but place few demands or controls on them".[44] Parents are nurturing and accepting, and are responsive to the child's needs and wishes. Indulgent parents do not require children to regulate themselves or behave appropriately. As adults, children of indulgent parents will pay less attention to avoiding behaviors that cause aggression in others.[60]
Permissive parents try to be "friends" with their child, and do not play a parental role.[61] The expectations of the child are very low, and there is little discipline. Permissive parents also allow children to make their own decisions, giving them advice as a friend. This type of parenting is very lax, with few punishments or rules.[61] Permissive parents also tend to give their children whatever they want and hope that they are appreciated for their accommodating style. Other permissive parents compensate for what they missed as children, and as a result give their children both the freedom and materials that they lacked in their childhood.[61] Baumrind's research on pre-school children with permissive parents found that the children were immature, lacked impulse control and were irresponsible.[62]
Children of permissive parents may tend to be more impulsive and as adolescents may engage more in misconduct such as drug use,[63] "Children never learn to control their own behavior and always expect to get their way."[44] But in the better cases they are emotionally secure, independent and are willing to learn and accept defeat. They mature quickly and are able to live life without the help of someone else.[64]
The teens least prone to heavy drinking had parents who scored high on both accountability and warmth.
So-called 'indulgent' parents, those low on accountability and high on warmth, nearly tripled the risk of their teen participating in heavy drinking.
'Strict parents' or authoritarian parents– high on accountability and low on warmth– more than doubled their teen's risk of heavy drinking.[65]
Neglectful or uninvolved
The parent is not responsive and not demanding.[66]
Neglectful parents are unaware of what their children are doing, and if they find out, they feel indifferent towards them.[67] Sometimes parents can be neglectful because of stressors they are experiencing in their own life.[68]
Children of neglectful parents, also sometimes known as latchkey parents, are often lonely, sad, immature, and have a difficult time to adapting to social norms. They are more likely to end up in abusive relationships, perform risky behaviors, and have increased rates of injury. They can also struggle with low self-esteem and emotional neediness, which may be caused from children being left alone throughout their younger years.[69]
Cultural effects on children
Most studies, mainly in English-speaking countries, show that children of authoritative parents have the best outcomes in different domains (behavioral, psychological and social adjustment…).[70] The case might be different, however, for Asian populations, where the authoritarian style was found as good as the authoritative style. On the other hand, some studies have found a superiority of the indulgent style in Spain,[71] Portugal[72] or Brazil,[73] but the methodology of these studies has been contested.[74] More recently a study has shown that in Spain, while using the same questionnaire used in other countries, the authoritative style continues to be the best one for children.[75] Furthermore, a systematic review has shown that the results do not depend on the culture but on the instruments used: studies measuring control as coercion find a detrimental effect of such control on adolescents, and better outcomes for children of permissive parents; however, when behavioral control is measured, such control is positive, and authoritative parents get the best results.[76]
Criticism of Baumrind's typology
Baumrind's typology has received significant criticism for containing overly broad categorizations and an imprecise and overly idealized description of authoritative parenting.[7] Author Alfie Kohn argued that Baumrind's "favored approach [of authoritative parenting], supposedly a blend of firmness and caring, is actually quite traditional and control-oriented,"[77] adding that the typology serves to "blur the differences between 'permissive' parents who were really just confused and those who were deliberately democratic."[78] Kohn's preferred approach is anti-authoritarian but also encourages respectful adult guidance and unconditional love, an approach which is not accounted for in Baumrind's typology.
Dr. Wendy Grolnick has critiqued Baumrind's use of the term "firm control" in her description of authoritative parenting and argued that there should be clear differentiation between coercive power assertion (which is associated with negative effects on children) and the more positive roles of structure and high expectations.[79]
Catherine C. Lewis argued that the empirical research on authoritative parenting did not sufficiently account for the possibility that positive effects associated with parental control emerged from the child's willingness to obey rather than the parent's tendency to exercise control.[80] Lewis also argued that the studies did not sufficiently separate the effects of firm control from the effects of other parenting practices that tend to accompany it. Therefore, it is possible for the child's outcomes to be attributed to those accompanying parenting practices rather than to the measure of firm control.
Attachment theory was created by John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth.[81] This theory focuses on the attachment of parents and children (specifically through infancy), and the aspect of children staying in close distance with their caregiver who will protect them from the outside world.[81] The bond that is created between child and mother is a vital part of how the child will grow up. Attachment between a mother and her child can be seen by the “child’s cry’s, their smiles and if they cling to their mother”, babies also turn to these attachment techniques when they feel unsafe, scared or confused. However, when the stress is gone and they know they are safe due to that relationship the infant or child can then engage in activities to strengthen how they explore and view the world around them.[82]
This theory includes the possible types of attachment:
Secure attachment is when the child feels comfortable exploring their environment when their caregiver is not there, but uses them as a base for comfort and security if they become frightened.[83]
Insecure attachment is when the child is hesitant to explore the environment on their own, and display reluctance in accepting comfort from their parent.[81]
Attachment theory in adolescence
Although research on attachment theory has focused on infancy and early childhood, research has shown that the relationship between teens and their parents can be affected depending on whether they have a secure or insecure attachment between them.[81] A parent's interaction with their child during infancy creates an internal working model of attachment, which is the development of expectations that a child has for future relationships and interactions based on the interactions they had during infancy with their caregiver.[81] If an adolescent continues to have a secure attachment with their caregiver, they are more likely to talk to their guardian about their problems and concerns, have stronger interpersonal relationships with friends and significant others, and also have higher self-esteem.[81] Parents continue to maintain a secure attachment through adolescence by expressing understanding, good communication skills, and allowing their children to safely start doing things independently.[83]
Other parenting styles
Attachment parenting
Attachment parenting is a parenting style framed by psychological attachment theory. Attachment in psychology is defined as "a lasting emotional bond between people".[84] There are four main types of attachment: secure, insecure, resistant, and disorganized.[85]
Resistant attachment relationships are typically going to be characterized by the child's exaggerated expression of getting their needs met through attachment.[86] When the infant is in with their caregiver, they begin to act hesitant towards exploring their environment and care more about getting attention from the caregiver.[86]
Disorganized is when the child outwardly shows behaviors that are odd or ambivalent towards the parent, (i.e. when the child runs up to their parent, and then immediately pulls away, and turns around to run away, curling up in a ball, or even hitting the parent).[87]
Child-centered parenting
Child-centered parenting is a parenting style advocated by Blythe and David Daniel, which focuses on the real needs and the unique person-hood of each child.[88] Some psychologists have argued that child-centered parenting is difficult to get right.[89]
Positive parenting
Positive parenting is a parenting style which generally overlaps with authoritative parenting and is defined by consistent support and guidance throughout developmental stages.[90]
A narcissistic parent is a parent affected by narcissism or narcissistic personality disorder. Typically narcissistic parents are exclusively and possessively close to their children and may be especially envious of, and threatened by, their child's growing independence.[92] The result may be what has been termed a pattern of narcissistic attachment, with the child considered to exist solely for the parent's benefit.[93] Parents who are narcissistic in their parenting will be involved in some if not all of these traits:
Nurturant parenting is defined by characteristics of being responsive and empathetic. It is a family model where children are expected to explore their surroundings with protection from their parents.[95] This style of parenting is encouraging and helps offer development opportunities for a child and their temperaments. A child's self-image, social skills, and academic performance will improve, impacting how they will grow up to be mature, happy, well-balanced adults.[96] It has been found that when families have low levels of nurturant-involved parenting the youth are more likely to get involved with illegal substances and underage drinking. This is an example of how powerful parenting styles are and the impact it has on children. Nurturant parenting is a warm and supportive environment for the children and there is a lack of hostility and rejection from the parents toward their kids.[97]
Overparenting
Overparenting is parents who try to involve themselves in every aspect of their child's life, often attempting to solve all their problems and stifling the child's ability to act independently or solve their own problems.[98] A helicopter parent is a colloquial early 21st-century term for a parent who pays extremely close attention to their children's experiences and problems and attempts to sweep all obstacles out of their paths, particularly at educational institutions. Overparenting limits a child's autonomy and essential development for independence. Helicopter parents are so named because they hover overhead like a helicopter, especially from late adolescence to early adulthood, during which time developing independence and self-sufficiency is critical to future success.[99] Modern communication technology has facilitated this style, allowing parents to monitor their children through cell phones, email and online monitoring of academic performance.[100]
Affectionless control
The affectionless control parental style combines a lack of warmth and caring (low parental care) with over-control (such as parental criticism, and intrusiveness). This has been linked to children's anxiety[101] and to dysfunctional attitudes and low self-esteem in the children,[102] although it is not necessarily the cause.[101] There is evidence that parental affectionless control is associated with suicidal behavior.[103]
Slow parenting
Slow parenting encourages parents to plan and organize less for their children, instead allowing them to enjoy their childhood and explore the world at their own pace. Electronics are limited, simplistic toys are utilized, and the child is allowed to develop their own interests and to grow into their own person with much family time, allowing children to make their own decisions.[104]
Idle parenting is a specific form of slow parenting according to which children can take care of themselves most of the time, and the parents would be happier if they spent more time taking care of themselves, too.
Toxic parenting
Toxic parenting is poor parenting, with a toxic relationship between the parent and child. It results in complete disruption of the child's ability to identify themselves and reduced self-esteem, neglecting the needs of the child. Abuse is sometimes seen in this parenting style.[105] Adults who had toxic parents are mostly unable to recognize toxic parenting behavior in themselves. Children with toxic and/or abusive parents often grow up with psychological and behavioral damage.[106] Some of the behaviors of toxic parenting include talking over their child, being in a cycle of negative thinking, being overly critical towards their children, and using guilt to control their child.[107]
Pathogenic parenting
Pathogenic parenting refers to parenting style practices that are so aberrant and distorted that they produce significant psychopathology in the child. This may lead to child psychological abuse (DSM-5 V995.51). It is generally used in the context of distortions to the child's attachment system since the attachment system does not spontaneously or independently dysfunctional.[108]
Dolphin parenting
Dolphin parenting is a term used by psychiatrist Shimi Kang and happiness researcher Shawn Achor to represent a parenting style seen as similar to the nature of dolphins, being "playful, social and intelligent".[109][110] It has been contrasted to "tiger" parenting.[109] According to Kang, dolphin parenting provides a balance between the strict approach of tiger parenting and the lack of rules and expectations that characterizes what she calls "jellyfish parents".[111] Dolphin parents avoid overscheduling activities for their children, refrain from being overprotective, and take into account the desires and goals of their children when setting expectations for behavior and academic success.[112]
'Ethnic minority' parenting style
'Ethnic minority' parenting style is an ethnocentric term coined in the USA out of authoritarian parenting, and it refers to a style characterized by exceptionally high academic achievements among children from Asian backgrounds. Ethnic minority style differs from strict authoritarian parenting by being highly responsive towards children's needs, while also differing from authoritative parenting by maintaining high demands, and not placing children's needs as a priority. This style promotes high demandingness and high responsiveness together to produce high academic performance in children.[113]
Alloparenting parenting style
Alloparenting is the practice of co-parenting a child by biological parents and members of the extended family or community. This type of parenting is most prevalent in Central African countries, such as the Democratic Republic of Congo and the Central African Republic; especially in Akka foraging communities.[114] Alloparenting is considered to help alleviate parental burdens by utilizing the community and allowing biological parents more time to work or participate in social events.[115] Some historians, such as Stephanie Coontz, suggest that alloparenting as a parenting style helps children to understand love and trust through a widened perspective due to increased bonds formed between child and adult.[116]
Unconditional parenting
The unconditional parenting style is one where parents provide their children with love and support no matter what the situation.[117] This type of parenting does not involve rewards or punishments but instead focuses on building a strong relationship with your child. It can be beneficial as it provides a sense of security for children.
Commando Parenting is another style where parents essentially do whatever it takes to raise children in their desired way.[118]
Gentle parenting
In The Gentle Parenting Book, Sarah Ockwell-Smith describes the discipline of gentle parenting as "being responsive to children's needs" and "recogniz[ing] that all children are individuals.".[119] With the help of sensitivity, respect, and understanding as well as the establishment of sound limits, gentle parenting aimsto raise children who are self-assured, autonomous, and content. This method of parenting places a strong emphasis on age-appropriate growth. Traditional parenting methods emphasize rewards and discipline. You reward your kid with enjoyable activities, treats, and encouraging words when they behave well or do something nice. Instead of concentrating on punishment and incentive, gentle parenting focuses on improving a child's self-awareness and understanding of their own conduct. Gentle parenting emphasizes how the parent's feelings are impacted by the child's behavior. This instills in them the same teachings about repercussions as conventional parenting methods, but with an emphasis on emotion. The child is observing the parent's reactions and learning how those actions make the parent feel. One of the greatest worries about gentle parenting is that the parent might come off as more of a companion than a parent, however, this is a misconception.[120]
Parenting neurodivergent children
Baumrind recommends implementing an accountable parenting approach. Research findings indicate that ADHD children are more negative and are often outspoken and dictatorial and show fewer inclinations to fixing issues. Researchers' findings showed that ADHD parents are less lenient but more strict in their parenting styles. Parents of children with ADHD and other parents share a comparable authoritative parenting approach. Gender has no bearing on parenting style, but parents of ADHD kids with greater schooling tend to be more permissive and authoritarian. Additionally, parents of children with ADHD who had lesser levels of schooling were more lax than parents of kids without ADHD.[121] These results suggest that families of children and teenagers with ADHD experience less family support and more behavioral and relational disturbances. When a parent adopts an autocratic parenting style, they are demanding but unresponsive. High standards and adherence to parental guidelines and directives define this parenting approach. Verbal conversation lacks emotional depth and is one-sided. When issuing orders, authoritarian parents frequently do not offer justification. These children are consequently lonely, depressed, susceptible, and wary. Additionally, in our research, parents of children with ADHD were less lax, which indicates that these parents have high expectations for their kids and exercise greater control over them. All of these things may be contributing factors to the signs of ADHD in kids and teenagers getting worse.[122]
Social dysfunction or isolation[124] (for example, parents unwilling to reach out to other families—especially those with children of the same gender and approximate age, or do nothing to help their "friendless" child)
Stifled speech (children not allowed to dissent or question authority)[124]
Denial of an "inner life" (children are not allowed to develop their own value systems)[124]
Double standards or giving "mixed messages" by having a dual system of values (i.e. one set for the outside world, another when in private, or teaching divergent values to each child)
The absentee parent (seldom available for their child due to work overload, alcohol/drug abuse, gambling, or other addictions)
Unfulfilled projects, activities, and promises affecting children ("We'll do it later")
Giving to one child what rightly belongs to another
Gender prejudice (treats one gender of children fairly; the other unfairly)
Discussion and exposure to sexuality: either too much, too soon or too little, too late
Parents always (or never) take their children's side when others report acts of misbehavior, or teachers report problems at school
Scapegoating (knowingly or recklessly blaming one child for the misdeeds of another)
"Tunnel vision" diagnosis of children's problems (for example, a parent may think their child is either lazy or has learning disabilities after he falls behind in school despite recent absence due to illness)
Older siblings given either no or excessive authority over younger siblings with respect to their age difference and level of maturity
Frequent withholding of consent ("blessing") for culturally common, lawful, and age-appropriate activities a child wants to take part in
The "know-it-all" (has no need to obtain child's side of the story when accusing, or listen to child's opinions on matters which greatly impact them)
Regularly forcing children to attend activities for which they are extremely over- or under-qualified (e.g. using a preschool to babysit a typical nine-year-old boy, taking a young child to poker games, etc.)
Either being a miser ("scrooge") in totality or selectively allowing children's needs to go unmet (e.g. a father will not buy a bicycle for his son because he wants to save money for retirement or "something important")
Disagreements about nature and nurture (parents, often non-biological, blame common problems on child's heredity, when faulty parenting may be the actual cause)
"Children as pawns"
One common dysfunctional parental behavior is a parent's manipulation of a child in order to achieve some outcome adverse to the other parent's rights or interests. Examples include verbal manipulation such as spreading gossip about the other parent, communicating with the parent through the child (and in the process exposing the child to the risks of the other parent's displeasure with that communication) rather than doing so directly, trying to obtain information through the child (spying), or causing the child to dislike the other parent, with insufficient or no concern for the damaging effects of the parent's behavior on the child. While many instances of such manipulation occur in shared custody situations that have resulted from separation or divorce, it can also take place in intact families, where it is known as triangulation.[127]
List of other dysfunctional styles
"Using" (destructively narcissistic parents who rule by fear and conditional love)
Abuse among siblings (parents fail to intervene when a sibling physically or sexually abuses another sibling)
Abandonment (a parent who willfully separates from their children, not wishing any further contact, and in some cases without locating alternative, long-term parenting arrangements, leaving them as orphans)
Appeasement (parents who reward bad behavior—even by their own standards—and inevitably punish another child's good behavior in order to maintain the peace and avoid temper tantrums. "Peace at any price")
Loyalty manipulation (giving unearned rewards and lavish attention trying to ensure a favored yet rebellious child will be the one most loyal and well-behaved, while subtly ignoring the wants and needs of their most loyal child currently)
"Helicopter parenting" (parents who micro-manage their children's lives or relationships among siblings—especially minor conflicts)
"The deceivers" (well-regarded parents in the community, likely to be involved in some charitable/non-profit works, who abuse or mistreat one or more of their children)
"Public image manager" (sometimes related to above, children warned to not disclose what fights, abuse, or damage happens at home, or face severe punishment. "Don't tell anyone what goes on in this family")
"The paranoid parent" (a parent having persistent and irrational fear accompanied by anger and false accusations that their child is up to no good or others are plotting harm)
"No friends allowed" (parents discourage, prohibit, or interfere with their child from making friends of the same age and gender)
Role reversal (parents who expect their minor children to take care of them instead)
"Not your business" (children continuously told that a particular brother or sister who is often causing problems is none of their concern)
Ultra-egalitarianism (either a much younger child is permitted to do whatever an older child may, or an older child must wait years until a younger child is mature enough)
"The guard dog" (a parent who blindly attacks family members perceived as causing the slightest upset to their esteemed spouse, partner, or child)
"My baby forever" (a parent who will not allow one or more of their young children to grow up and begin taking care of themselves)
"The cheerleader" (one parent "cheers on" the other parent who is simultaneously abusing their child)
"Along for the ride" (a reluctant de facto, step, foster, or adoptive parent who does not truly care about their non-biological child, but must co-exist in the same home for the sake of their spouse or partner) (See also: Cinderella effect)
"The politician" (a parent who repeatedly makes or agrees to children's promises while having little to no intention of keeping them)
"It's taboo" (parents rebuff any questions children may have about sexuality, pregnancy, romance, puberty, certain areas of human anatomy, nudity, etc.)
Identified patient (one child, usually selected by the mother, who is forced into going to therapy while the family's overall dysfunction is kept hidden)
Münchausen syndrome by proxy (a much more extreme situation than above, where the child is intentionally made ill by a parent seeking attention from physicians and other professionals)
Cross-cultural variation
Many of these theories of parenting styles are almost entirely based on evidence from high-income countries, especially the USA. However, there are many fundamental differences in child development between high and low-income countries, due to differences in parenting styles and practices.[128] For instance, in sub-Saharan Africa children are likely to have more than one main caregiver, to acquire language in a bilingual environment, and to play in mixed aged peer groups.[129] However, when comparing African American caregiving among lower, middle, and upper socioeconomic families, the number of non-parental caregivers decreases as economic resources increase.[130] In addition, international studies have found Chinese parents to be more concerned with impulse control, which may explain the greater use of authoritarian style as compared to U.S. parents.[131][132] Thus, social values and norms within a culture influence the choice of parenting style that will help the child conform to cultural expectations.[132]
There is evidence to suggest cultural differences in the way children respond to parenting practices.[133][134] In particular, there is ongoing debate surrounding physical discipline and corporal punishment of children.[133][135][136] with some authors suggesting it is less harmful in ethnic groups or countries where it is culturally normative,[137] such as several low income countries, where the prevalence rate remains high.[138] Lansford et al (2004) reported harsh parenting was associated with more externalising behaviours in European American compared with African American adolescents.[139] Resolving these issues is important in assessing the transferability of parenting interventions across cultures and from high to low income countries in order to improve child development and health outcomes.[140]
Some parenting styles correlate with positive outcomes across cultures, while other parenting styles correlate with outcomes that are specific to one culture. For example, authoritative parenting is related to positive self-esteem and academic outcomes for both Chinese and European American adolescents, but the positive effects of the "ethnic minority" parenting style are specific to Chinese adolescents.[131] There is also evidence to suggest that there is not only cultural variation but variations across settings within a culture.[141] For example, Mexican American and African American parental expectations of obedience and autonomy differ in school and other social settings vs. home.[141] A study comparing Indian parents who stayed in India and Indian parents who immigrated to a different country shows that the influence cultural traditions have on parenting changes according to social/geographical context, concluding that immigrant parents place greater emphasis on traditional Indian culture in order to preserve traditional practices in their new country.[142] Thus, in immigrant families, parenting styles according to culture may be the result of conscious reinforcement as opposed to unconscious tradition.[142]
Differences for male and female children
Parents tend to adopt different parenting behaviors based on the sex of their child,[143] fathers more so than mothers. Studies have shown that fathers are more emotionally and mentally reactive with their daughters.[144] This may cause fathers to have a different parental style between their daughters and sons. For example, fathers tend to focus on their sons' masculinity, teaching them about independence. Fathers treat their daughters with more gentleness, focusing on her ability to care for others.[145]
However, studies have shown mothers don't see a difference emotionally or mentally for their daughters and/or sons.[144][failed verification] Mothers tend to have the same parenting style regardless of the gender of their child.[146]
Differential parenting
Differential parenting is when siblings individually receive different parenting styles or behavior from their parents.[52] This most often occurs in families where the children are adolescents, and is highly related as to how each child interprets their parent's behavior.[52] Research shows that children who view their parents as authoritative generally tend to be happier and functioning at a higher level in a variety of areas.[52] When analyzing the level of differentiation within a family, it is important to look at the difference in the level of responsiveness (including specific characteristics of warmth, sensitivity, and positivity), control, leniency, and negativity that are directed at each individual child.[147] Differential parenting often leads to a non-shared environment, which is when siblings have different experiences growing up in the same household, and different personal outcomes based on their environment.[148]
In most families with more than one child, parents will adjust their parenting styles according to what their child best responds to, however, a high level of differential parenting can have negative effects on children.[147] The effects that differential parenting has on families differs, but in general there are usually negative effects on both children.[147] The severity of effects is more extreme for the child who is viewed as disfavored.[147] The "disfavored" child generally has a variety of personal development issues such as low self-esteem and depression.[147] The favored child tends to have higher self-esteem and more friends in school.[147] However, studies show that both favored and disfavored children tend to have problems with interpersonal relationships, as well as problems with managing their emotions.[147] A high level of differential parenting also influences how siblings treat one another, and the level of conflict in the sibling relationship.[147] Research shows that this is due in part to children imitating their parents' behaviors.[147]
One theory being discussed in relation to differential parenting is social comparison.[149] Social comparison is the outcome of adolescents comparing the treatment they receive from their guardians versus the treatment their siblings receive. While these comparisons on treatment may be subconscious, it is vital to a child's formation of self-worth and their perceived role within the family dynamic.[150] As the years go on and adolescents grow and mature, their perception of differential parenting within their household becomes prominent and plays a role in forming one's own identity. If the adolescent views inequitable treatment intentional or not on behalf of the guardian's report have shown internalized symptoms of depression, anxiety, etc., and external outburst such as risk-taking, and delinquency to non-verbally communicate to a guardian unfair treatment.[150] Parental differential treatment is seen by researchers as “arguably a subjective phenomenon” because it is based on perception.[150] Much research has still yet to be completed on this subject but based on what is known can be attributed to the social comparison arising from differential parenting.
↑ Steinberg, Laurence; Lamborn, Susie D.; Dornbusch, Sanford M.; Darling, Nancy (October 1992). "Impact of Parenting Practices on Adolescent Achievement: Authoritative Parenting, School Involvement, and Encouragement to Succeed". Child Development. 63 (5): 1266–1281. doi:10.2307/1131532. JSTOR1131532. PMID1446552.
↑ Amato, Paul R. (February 1988). "Family processes and the competence of adolescents and primary school children". Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 18 (1): 39–53. doi:10.1007/bf02139245. PMID24271603. S2CID35288922.
↑ Kurdek, Lawrence A.; Fine, Mark A. (August 1994). "Family Acceptance and Family Control as Predictors of Adjustment in Young Adolescents: Linear, Curvilinear, or Interactive Effects?". Child Development. 65 (4): 1137–1146. doi:10.2307/1131310. JSTOR1131310. PMID7956470.
↑ Gray, Marjory Roberts; Steinberg, Laurence (August 1999). "Unpacking Authoritative Parenting: Reassessing a Multidimensional Construct". Journal of Marriage and the Family. 61 (3): 574. doi:10.2307/353561. JSTOR353561.
↑ Amato, Paul R.; Fowler, Frieda (August 2002). "Parenting Practices, Child Adjustment, and Family Diversity". Journal of Marriage and Family. 64 (3): 703–716. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00703.x. S2CID143550911.
↑ Erikson, Erik (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. W. W. Norton & Company. pp.15–19. ISBN0393311449.
↑ Constantinople, Anne (July 1969). "An Eriksonian measure of personality development in college students". Developmental Psychology. 1 (4): 357–372. doi:10.1037/h0027706.
↑ Sheehy, Noel; Chapman, Antony J.; Conroy, Wenday A., eds. (2016). "Erikson, Erik Homburger". Biographical Dictionary of Psychology. p.170. doi:10.4324/9780203827086. ISBN978-1-136-79885-6.
↑ Wright, Benjamin (Winter 1957). "Psychology in the Classroom by Rudolf Dreikurs". The School Review. 65 (4): 490–492. doi:10.1086/442418.
↑ Goddard, H. Wallace; Dennis, Steven A. (2003). "Parenting Education". In James J. Ponzetti Jr (ed.). International Encyclopedia of Marriage and Family. Gale, Farmington, USA. Archived from the original on 18 October 2014. Retrieved 13 October 2014.
↑ A position not actually taken by the author, but apparently it was feared that "lay readers" would still interpret the book in this way, as in "Will it free some to mistreat their kids, since 'it doesn't matter'?", with this fear being attributed to "psychologist Frank Farley of Temple University, president of the APA division that honored Harris" by Begley, Sharon (1998-09-29). "The Parent Trap". Newsweek.
↑ Wright, Amanda J.; Jackson, Joshua J. (6 January 2023). "Is parent personality associated with adolescent outcomes for their child? A response surface analysis approach". Infant and Child Development. 33 (2). doi:10.1002/icd.2395.
↑ Baumrind, D. (February 1967). "Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior". Genetic Psychology Monographs. 75 (1): 43–88. PMID6032134.
↑ Baumrind, Diana (March 1978). "Parental Disciplinary Patterns and Social Competence in Children". Youth & Society. 9 (3): 239–267. doi:10.1177/0044118x7800900302. S2CID140984313.
↑ Arnett, Jeffrey (2013). Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood: A Cultural Approach. United States of America: Pearson Education. p.182. ISBN9780205892495.
↑ Arnett, Jeffrey (2013). Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood: A Cultural Approach. United States Of America: Pearson. p.182. ISBN978-0-205-89249-5.
↑ Maccoby, E.E.; Martin, J.A. (1983). "Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction". In Mussen, P.H.; Hetherington, E.M. (eds.). Manual of child psychology, Vol. 4: Social development. New York: John Wiley and Sons. pp.1–101.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Santrock, J.W. (2007). A topical approach to life-span development, third Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.[pageneeded]
↑ Turner, Erlanger A.; Chandler, Megan; Heffer, Robert W. (May 2009). "The Influence of Parenting Styles, Achievement Motivation, and Self-Efficacy on Academic Performance in College Students". Journal of College Student Development. 50 (3): 337–346. doi:10.1353/csd.0.0073. S2CID14083139.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Arnett, Jeffrey (2013). Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood: A Cultural Approach. United States Of America: Pearson. pp.182–188. ISBN978-0-205-89249-5.
↑ Stassen Berger, Kathleen (2011). The Developing Person Through the Life Span. Worth Publishing. pp.273–274.
↑ Shaw, Zoey A.; Starr, Lisa R. (December 2019). "Intergenerational Transmission of Emotion Dysregulation: The Role of Authoritarian Parenting Style and Family Chronic Stress". Journal of Child and Family Studies. 28 (12): 3508–3518. doi:10.1007/s10826-019-01534-1. S2CID203481307.
↑ Moore, Shirley G. (1992). The Role of Parents in the Development of Peer Group Competence (Report). ERICED346992.
1 2 3 4 Stassen Berger, Kathleen (2011). The Developing Person Through the Lifespan. Worth Publishers. p.274.
↑ Chao, Ruth K. (1994). "Beyond Parental Control and Authoritarian Parenting Style: Understanding Chinese Parenting through the Cultural Notion of Training". Child Development. 65 (4): 1111–1119. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00806.x. PMID7956468. S2CID45541038.
↑ Deater-Deckard, Kirby (2013). "The Social Environment and the Development of Psychopathology". In Zelazo, Philip David (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Developmental Psychology, Vol. 2: Self and Other. pp.527–548. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199958474.013.0021. ISBN978-0-19-995847-4.
↑ Chan, T. W.; Koo, A. (June 2011). "Parenting Style and Youth Outcomes in the UK". European Sociological Review. 27 (3): 385–399. doi:10.1093/esr/jcq013.
↑ Darling, Nancy (March 1999). Parenting Style and Its Correlates (Report). ERICED427896.
↑ Rodrigues, Yara; Veiga, Feliciano; Fuentes, María C.; García, Fernando (11 March 2013). "Parenting and Adolescents' Self-esteem: The Portuguese Context". Revista de Psicodidactica. 18 (2): 395–416. doi:10.1387/RevPsicodidact.6842.
↑ Oliva, Alfredo (12 January 2006). "Relaciones familiares y desarrollo adolescente". Anuario de Psicología/The UB Journal of Psychology: 209–224. hdl:11441/67352. ProQuest2681622081.
↑ Osorio, Alfonso; González-Cámara, Marta (November 2016). "Testing the alleged superiority of the indulgent parenting style among Spanish adolescents". Psicothema. 28 (4): 414–420. doi:10.7334/psicothema2015.314. hdl:10171/42045. PMID27776610.
↑ Kohn, Alfie (2006). Unconditional Parenting: Moving from Rewards and Punishments to Love and Reason. Simon and Schuster. p.14. ISBN978-0-7434-8748-1.
↑ Grolnick, Wendy S. (2012). "The Relations among Parental Power Assertion, Control, and Structure: Commentary on Baumrind". Human Development. 55 (2): 57–64. doi:10.1159/000338533. JSTOR26764606. S2CID144535005.
↑ Lewis, Catherine C. (November 1981). "The effects of parental firm control: A reinterpretation of findings". Psychological Bulletin. 90 (3): 547–563. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.3.547.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Arnett, Jeffrey Jensen (2013). Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood: A Cultural Approach. United States of America: Pearson Education. pp.188–190. ISBN9780205892495.
1 2 Bretherton, Inge (September 1992). "The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth". Developmental Psychology. 28 (5): 759–775. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.28.5.759.
↑ Stassen Berger, Kathleen (2011). The Developing Person Through the Life Span. p.194.
↑ Stassen Berger, Kathleen (2011). The Developing Person Through the Life Span. p.196.
↑ Walton, Stephen. "The Positive parenting centre". www.the-positive-parenting-centre.com. Archived from the original on 10 December 2014. Retrieved 10 December 2014.
↑ Oyserman, Daphna; Radin, Norma; Saltz, Eli (1 June 1994). "Predictors of nurturant parenting in teen mothers living in three generational families". Child Psychiatry and Human Development. 24 (4): 215–230. doi:10.1007/BF02353198. hdl:2027.42/43953. PMID8082418. S2CID470045.
↑ Winner, Nathan A.; Nicholson, Bonnie C. (November 2018). "Overparenting and Narcissism in Young Adults: The Mediating Role of Psychological Control". Journal of Child and Family Studies. 27 (11): 3650–3657. doi:10.1007/s10826-018-1176-3. S2CID150247085.
↑ Jackson, L. J. (November 2010). "Smothering Mothering: 'Helicopter parents' are landing big in child care cases". ABA Journal. 96 (11): 18–19. JSTOR20789779.
↑ Gordon, Larry; Kim, Victoria (24 January 2008). "Hovering Parents No Big Deal for Freshmen". Los Angeles Times. p.B1.
↑ Kang, Shimi (2014). The Dolphin Way: A Parent's Guide to Raising Healthy, Happy, and Motivated Kids—Without Turning into a Tiger. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher, Inc.ISBN978-0-399-16604-4.
↑ Stefanidi, Evropi; Schöning, Johannes; Feger, Sebastian S.; Marshall, Paul; Rogers, Yvonne; Niess, Jasmin (2022). "Designing for Care Ecosystems: A Literature Review of Technologies for Children with ADHD". Interaction Design and Children. pp.13–25. doi:10.1145/3501712.3529746. ISBN978-1-4503-9197-9.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Neuharth, Dan (1999). If You Had Controlling Parents: How to Make Peace with Your Past and Take Your Place in the World. Diane Publishing Company. ISBN978-0788193835.
↑ Roopnarine, Jaipaul L.; Fouts, Hillary N.; Lamb, Michael E.; Lewis-Elligan, Tracey Y. (September 2005). "Mothers' and Fathers' Behaviors Toward Their 3- to 4-Month-Old Infants in Lower, Middle, and Upper Socioeconomic African American Families". Developmental Psychology. 41 (5): 723–732. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.5.723. PMID16173870.
1 2 Li, Yan; Costanzo, Philip R.; Putallaz, Martha (29 October 2010). "Maternal Socialization Goals, Parenting Styles, and Social-Emotional Adjustment Among Chinese and European American Young Adults: Testing a Mediation Model". The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 171 (4): 330–362. doi:10.1080/00221325.2010.505969. PMID21171548. S2CID23895038.
1 2 Porter, Christian; Hart, Craig; Yang, Chongming; Robinson, Clyde; Frost Olsen, Susanne; Zeng, Qing; Olsen, Joseph; Jin, Shenghua (2005). "A comparative study of child temperament and parenting in Beijing, China and the western United States". International Journal of Behavioral Development. 29 (6): 541–551. doi:10.1080/01650250500147402.
1 2 Gershoff, Elizabeth Thompson (2002). "Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review". Psychological Bulletin. 128 (4): 539–579. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.539. PMID12081081. S2CID2393109.
↑ Yasui, Miwa; Dishion, Thomas J. (25 June 2007). "The Ethnic Context of Child and Adolescent Problem Behavior: Implications for Child and Family Interventions". Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 10 (2): 137–179. doi:10.1007/s10567-007-0021-9. PMID17588150. S2CID3133120.
↑ Vittrup, Brigitte; Holden, George W. (May 2010). "Children's assessments of corporal punishment and other disciplinary practices: The role of age, race, SES, and exposure to spanking". Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 31 (3): 211–220. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2009.11.003.
1 2 Tamis-LeMonda, Catherine S.; Way, Niobe; Hughes, Diane; Yoshikawa, Hirokazu; Kalman, Ronit Kahana; Niwa, Erika Y. (February 2008). "Parents' Goals for Children: The Dynamic Coexistence of Individualism and Collectivism in Cultures and Individuals". Social Development. 17 (1): 183–209. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00419.x.
1 2 Sapru, Saloni (September 2006). "Parenting and Adolescent Identity: A Study of Indian Families in New Delhi and Geneva". Journal of Adolescent Research. 21 (5): 484–513. doi:10.1177/0743558406291766. S2CID145443797.
Developmental psychology is the scientific study of how and why humans grow, change, and adapt across the course of their lives. Originally concerned with infants and children, the field has expanded to include adolescence, adult development, aging, and the entire lifespan. Developmental psychologists aim to explain how thinking, feeling, and behaviors change throughout life. This field examines change across three major dimensions, which are physical development, cognitive development, and social emotional development. Within these three dimensions are a broad range of topics including motor skills, executive functions, moral understanding, language acquisition, social change, personality, emotional development, self-concept, and identity formation.
Parenting or child rearing promotes and supports the physical, cognitive, social, emotional, and educational development from infancy to adulthood. Parenting refers to the intricacies of raising a child and not exclusively for a biological relationship.
Conduct disorder (CD) is a mental disorder diagnosed in childhood or adolescence that presents itself through a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that includes theft, lies, physical violence that may lead to destruction, and reckless breaking of rules, in which the basic rights of others or major age-appropriate norms are violated. These behaviors are often referred to as "antisocial behaviors", and is often seen as the precursor to antisocial personality disorder; however, the latter, by definition, cannot be diagnosed until the individual is 18 years old. Conduct disorder may result from parental rejection and neglect and can be treated with family therapy, as well as behavioral modifications and pharmacotherapy. Conduct disorder is estimated to affect 51.1 million people globally as of 2013.
Attachment disorder is a broad term intended to describe disorders of mood, behavior, and social relationships arising from unavailability of normal socializing care and attention from primary caregiving figures in early childhood. Such a failure would result from unusual early experiences of neglect, abuse, abrupt separation from caregivers between three months and three years of age, frequent change or excessive numbers of caregivers, or lack of caregiver responsiveness to child communicative efforts resulting in a lack of basic trust. A problematic history of social relationships occurring after about age three may be distressing to a child, but does not result in attachment disorder.
Reactive attachment disorder (RAD) is described in clinical literature as a severe disorder that can affect children, although these issues do occasionally persist into adulthood. RAD is characterized by markedly disturbed and developmentally inappropriate ways of relating socially in most contexts. It can take the form of a persistent failure to initiate or respond to most social interactions in a developmentally appropriate way—known as the "inhibited form". In the DSM-5, the "disinhibited form" is considered a separate diagnosis named "disinhibited attachment disorder".
Child discipline is the methods used to prevent future unwanted behaviour in children. The word discipline is defined as imparting knowledge and skill, in other words, to teach. In its most general sense, discipline refers to systematic instruction given to a disciple. To discipline means to instruct a person to follow a particular code of conduct.
Attachment theory is a psychological and evolutionary framework concerning the relationships between humans, particularly the importance of early bonds between infants and their primary caregivers. Developed by psychiatrist and psychoanalyst John Bowlby (1907–90), the theory posits that infants need to form a close relationship with at least one primary caregiver to ensure their survival, and to develop healthy social and emotional functioning.
Child psychopathology refers to the scientific study of mental disorders in children and adolescents. Oppositional defiant disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and autism spectrum disorder are examples of psychopathology that are typically first diagnosed during childhood. Mental health providers who work with children and adolescents are informed by research in developmental psychology, clinical child psychology, and family systems. Lists of child and adult mental disorders can be found in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Edition (ICD-10), published by the World Health Organization (WHO) and in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA). In addition, the Diagnostic Classification of Mental Health and Developmental Disorders of Infancy and Early Childhood is used in assessing mental health and developmental disorders in children up to age five.
Tough love is the act of treating a person sternly or harshly with the intent to help them in the long run. People exhibit and act upon tough love when attempting to address someone else’s undesirable behaviour. Tough love can be used in many scenarios such as when parenting, teaching, rehabilitating, self-improving or simply when making a decision. Tough love is usually seen as positive due to its encouragement of growth, boundaries, resilience and independence.
Emotional dysregulation is characterized by an inability to flexibly respond to and manage emotional states, resulting in intense and prolonged emotional reactions that deviate from social norms, given the nature of the environmental stimuli encountered. Such reactions not only deviate from accepted social norms but also surpass what is informally deemed appropriate or proportional to the encountered stimuli.
Diana Blumberg Baumrind was a clinical and developmental psychologist known for her research on parenting styles and for her critique of the use of deception in psychological research.
The behavioral analysis of child development originates from John B. Watson's behaviorism.
Attachment-based therapy applies to interventions or approaches based on attachment theory, originated by John Bowlby. These range from individual therapeutic approaches to public health programs to interventions specifically designed for foster carers. Although attachment theory has become a major scientific theory of socioemotional development with one of the broadest, deepest research lines in modern psychology, attachment theory has, until recently, been less clinically applied than theories with far less empirical support. This may be partly due to lack of attention paid to clinical application by Bowlby himself and partly due to broader meanings of the word 'attachment' used amongst practitioners. It may also be partly due to the mistaken association of attachment theory with the pseudo-scientific interventions misleadingly known as attachment therapy. The approaches set out below are examples of recent clinical applications of attachment theory by mainstream attachment theorists and clinicians and are aimed at infants or children who have developed or are at risk of developing less desirable, insecure attachment styles or an attachment disorder.
Social competence consists of social, emotional, cognitive, and behavioral skills needed for successful social adaptation. Social competence also reflects having the ability to take another's perspective concerning a situation, learn from past experiences, and apply that learning to the changes in social interactions.
Triple P is a parenting intervention with the main goals of increasing the knowledge, skills, and confidence of parents and reducing the prevalence of mental health, emotional, and behavioral problems in children and adolescents. The program was originally specifically tailored for at risk children and parents, but there are now different levels of Triple P designed to work together as a broad, universal, public health approach. This program is based on principles of community psychology.
Amy Gene Halberstadt is an American psychologist specializing in the social development of emotion. She is currently Alumni Distinguished Undergraduate Professor of Psychology at North Carolina State University in Raleigh, North Carolina, and is an editor of the journal Social Development.
Maternal sensitivity is a mother's ability to perceive and infer the meaning behind her infant's behavioural signals, and to respond to them promptly and appropriately. Maternal sensitivity affects child development at all stages through life, from infancy, all the way to adulthood. In general, more sensitive mothers have healthier, more socially and cognitively developed children than those who are not as sensitive. Also, maternal sensitivity has been found to affect the person psychologically even as an adult. Adults who experienced high maternal sensitivity during their childhood were found to be more secure than those who experienced less sensitive mothers. Once the adult becomes a parent themselves, their own understanding of maternal sensitivity will affect their own children's development. Some research suggests that adult mothers display more maternal sensitivity than adolescent mothers who may in turn have children with a lower IQ and reading level than children of adult mothers.
Ruth K. Chao is an American psychologist. Her research interests center around the parenting styles and socialization of East Asian immigrant families, especially Chinese families, in the United States and Canada. She is an associate professor in the Psychology Department and the principal investigator for the Multicultural Families and Adolescents Study (MFAS) research project at the University of California, Riverside. She is a board member of the Global Parenting Education Group, a nonprofit organization that focuses on parent education in China and other countries.
Social emotional development represents a specific domain of child development. It is a gradual, integrative process through which children acquire the capacity to understand, experience, express, and manage emotions and to develop meaningful relationships with others. As such, social emotional development encompasses a large range of skills and constructs, including, but not limited to: self-awareness, joint attention, play, theory of mind, self-esteem, emotion regulation, friendships, and identity development.
Grazyna Kochanska is a Polish-American developmental psychologist known for her research on parent-child relationships, developmental psychopathology, child temperament and its role in social development. She is the Stuit Professor of Developmental Psychology at the University of Iowa.
References
Hong, J.S. (2021). "Parenting style and bullying and victimization: Comparing foreign-born Asian, US-born Asian, and White American adolescents". Journal of Family Violence. 36 (7): 799–811. doi:10.1007/s10896-020-00176-y. S2CID220294556.
Fatima, S. (2022). "Parenting styles, moral identity and prosocial behaviors in adolescents". Current Psychology. 41 (2): 902–910. doi:10.1007/s12144-020-00609-3. S2CID212920276.
Younesian, S. (2021). "Maternal interactive beliefs and style as predictors of language development in preterm and full-term children". Journal of Child Language. 48 (2): 215–243. doi:10.1017/S0305000920000148. PMID32618520. S2CID220328655.
Sanvictores T, Mendez MD. (2023). "Types of Parenting Styles and Effects on Children". StatPearls. StatPearls. PMID33760502.
Zhang, X. (2021). "Resting heart rate mediates the relationship between parenting style and callous-unemotional traits in Chinese children". Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology. 49 (11): 1419–1430. doi:10.1007/s10802-021-00834-9. PMID34128174. S2CID235438369.
Edenroth-Cato, F. (2020). "Motherhood and highly sensitive children in an online discussion forum". Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine. 24 (4): 442–458. doi:10.1177/1363459318812003. PMID30458638. S2CID53943559.Barnhart, C.; Raval, V.; Jansari, A.; Raval, P. (2013). "Perception of Parenting Style Among College Students in India and the United States". Journal of Child Family Stud. 22 (5): 684–693. doi:10.1007/s10826-012-9621-1. S2CID145393764.
Pomeranz, E.; Wang, Q. (2009). "The Role of Parental Control in Children's Development in Western and East Asia Countries". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 18 (5): 285–289. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01653.x. S2CID145272128.
Bower, Bruce (September 2011). "Humans: Recession alters parenting style: Mothers with gene variant became more aggressive". Science News. 180 (7): 9. doi:10.1002/scin.5591800706.
Robert Feldman, PhD at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Child Development Third Edition
Morris, A. S., Cui, L., & Steinberg, L. (2013). Parenting research and themes: What we have learned and where to go next. In R. E. Larzelere, A. S. Morris, & A. W. Harrist (Eds.), Authoritative parenting: Synthesizing nurturance and discipline for optimal child development (pp.35–58). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Estep, Hanna M.; Olson, James N. (December 2011). "Parenting style, academic dishonesty, and infidelity in college students". College Student Journal. 45 (4): 830–839. GaleA278276704.
Grobman, K.H. (2003). Diana Baumrind's (1966) Prototypical Descriptions of 3 Parenting Styles. Retrieved from Diana Baumrind & Parenting Styles
Rivers, J.; Mullis, A. K.; Fortner, L. A.; Mullis, R. L. (2012). "Relationships Between Parenting Styles and the Academic Performance of Adolescents". Journal of Family Social Work. 15 (3): 202–216. doi:10.1080/10522158.2012.666644. S2CID144485738.
Schary, D. P.; Cardinal, B. J.; Loprinzi, P. D. (2012). "Parenting style associated with sedentary behaviour in preschool children". Early Child Development & Care. 182 (8): 1015–1026. doi:10.1080/03004430.2012.678596. S2CID144427759.
Williams, K.; Ciarrochi, J.; Heaven, P. (2012). "Inflexible Parents, Inflexible Kids: A 6-Year Longitudinal Study of Parenting Style and the Development of Psychological Flexibility in Adolescents". Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 41 (8): 1053–1066. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9744-0. PMID22311519. S2CID207207009.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
