Type IIB supergravity

Last updated

In supersymmetry, type IIB supergravity is the unique supergravity in ten dimensions with two supercharges of the same chirality. It was first constructed in 1983 by John Schwarz and independently by Paul Howe and Peter West at the level of its equations of motion. [1] [2] While it does not admit a fully covariant action due to the presence of a self-dual field, it can be described by an action if the self-duality condition is imposed by hand on the resulting equations of motion. The other types of supergravity in ten dimensions are type IIA supergravity, which has two supercharges of opposing chirality, and type I supergravity, which has a single supercharge. The theory plays an important role in modern physics since it is the low-energy limit of type IIB string theory.

Contents

History

After supergravity was discovered in 1976, there was a concentrated effort to construct the various possible supergravities that were classified in 1978 by Werner Nahm. [3] He showed that there exist three types of supergravity in ten dimensions, later named type I, type IIA and type IIB. [4] While both type I and type IIA can be realised at the level of the action, type IIB does not admit a covariant action. Instead it was first fully described through its equations of motion, derived in 1983 by John Schwartz, [1] and independently by Paul Howe and Peter West. [2] In 1995 it was realised that one can effectively describe the theory using a pseudo-action where the self-duality condition is imposed as an additional constraint on the equations of motion. [5] The main application of the theory is as the low-energy limit of type IIB strings, and so it plays an important role in string theory, type IIB moduli stabilisation, and the AdS/CFT correspondence.

Theory

Ten-dimensional supergravity admits both and supergravities, which differ by the number of the MajoranaWeyl spinor supercharges that they possess. The type IIB theory has two supercharges of the same chirality, equivalent to a single Weyl supercharge, with it sometimes denoted as the ten-dimensional supergravity. [nb 1] The field content of this theory is given by the ten dimensional chiral supermultiplet . [6] Here is the metric corresponding to the graviton, while are 4-form, 2-form, and 0-form gauge fields. Meanwhile, is the Kalb–Ramond field and is the dilaton. [7] :313 There is also a single left-handed Weyl gravitino , equivalent to two left-handed Majorana–Weyl gravitinos, and a single right-handed Weyl fermion , also equivalent to two right-handed Majorana–Weyl fermions. [8] :271

Algebra

The superalgebra for ten-dimensional supersymmetry is given by [9]

Here with are the two Majorana–Weyl supercharges of the same chirality. They therefore satisfy the projection relation where is the left-handed chirality projection operator and is the ten-dimensional chirality matrix.

The matrices allowed on the right-hand side are fixed by the fact that they must be representations of the R-symmetry group of the type IIB theory, [10] :240 which only allows for , and trace-free symmetric matrices . Since the anticommutator is symmetric under an exchange of the spinor and indices, the maximally extended superalgebra can only have terms with the same chirality and symmetry property as the anticommutator. The terms are therefore a product of one of the matrices with , where is the charge conjugation operator. In particular, when the spinor matrix is symmetric, it multiplies or while when it is antisymmetric it multiplies . In ten dimensions is symmetric for modulo and antisymmetric for modulo . [10] :47–48 Since the projection operator is a sum of the identity and a gamma matrix, this means that the symmetric combination works when modulo and the antisymmetric one when modulo . This yields all the central charges found in the superalgebra up to Poincaré duality.

The central charges are each associated to various BPS states that are found in the theory. The central charges correspond to the fundametnal string and the D1 brane, is associated with the D3 brane, while and give three 5-form charges. [9] One is the D5-brane, another the NS5-brane, and the last is associated with the KK monopole.

Self-dual field

For the supergravity multiplet to have an equal number of bosonic and fermionic degrees of freedom, the four-form has to have 35 degrees of freedom. [8] :271 This is achieved when the corresponding field strength tensor is self-dual , eliminating half of the degrees of freedom that would otherwise be found in a 4-form gauge field.

This presents a problem when constructing an action since the kinetic term for the self-dual 5-form field vanishes. [nb 2] The original way around this was to only work at the level of the equations of motion where self-duality is just another equation of motion. While it is possible to formulate a covariant action with the correct degrees of freedom by introducing an auxiliary field and a compensating gauge symmetry, [12] the more common approach is to instead work with a pseudo-action where self-duality is imposed as an additional constraint on the equations of motion. [5] Without this constraint the action cannot be supersymmetric since it does not have an equal number of fermionic and bosonic degrees of freedom. Unlike for example type IIA supergravity, type IIB supergravity cannot be acquired as a dimensional reduction of a theory in higher dimensions. [13]

Pseudo-action

The bosonic part of the pseudo-action for type IIB supergravity is given by [14] :114

Here and are modified field strength tensors for the 2-form and 4-form gauge fields, with the resulting Bianchi identity for the 5-form being given by . [15] The notation employed for the kinetic terms is . Self-duality has to be imposed by hand onto the equations of motion, making this a pseudo-action rather than a regular action.

The first line in the action contains the Einstein–Hilbert action, the dilaton kinetic term, and the Kalb–Ramond field strength tensor . The first term on the second line has the appropriately modified field strength tensors for the three gauge fields, while the last term is a Chern–Simons term. The action is written in the string frame which allows one to equate the fields to type IIB string states. In particular, the first line consists of kinetic terms for the NSNS fields, with these terms being identical to those found in type IIA supergravity. The first integral on the second line meanwhile consists of the kinetic term for the RR fields.

Global symmetry

Type IIB supergravity has a global noncompact symmetry. [7] :315–317 This can be made explicit by rewriting the action into the Einstein frame and defining the axio-dilaton complex scalar field . Introducing the matrix

and combining the two 3-form field strength tensors into a doublet , the action becomes [16] :91

This action is manifestly invariant under the transformation which transforms the 3-forms and the axio-dilaton as

Both the metric and the self-dual field strength tensor are invariant under these transformations. The invariance of the 3-form field strength tensors follows from the fact that .

Supersymmetry transformations

The equations of motion acquired from the supergravity action are invariant under the following supersymmetry transformations [17]

Here are the field strength tensors associated with the gauge fields, including all their magnetic duals for , while . Additionally, when is even and when it is odd.

Relation to string theory

Type IIB supergravity is the low-energy limit of type IIB string theory. The fields of the supergravity in the string frame are directly related to the different massless states of the string theory. In particular, the metric, Kalb–Ramond field, and dilaton are NSNS fields, while the three p-forms are RR fields. Meanwhile, the gravitational coupling constant is related to the Regge slope through . [14] :114

The global symmetry of the supergravity is not a symmetry of the full type IIB string theory since it would mix the and fields. This does not happen in the string theory since one of these is an NSNS field and the other an RR field, with these having different physics, such as the former coupling to strings but the latter not. [16] :92 The symmetry is instead broken to the discrete subgroup which is believed to be a symmetry of the full type IIB string theory.

The quantum theory is anomaly free, with the gravitational anomalies cancelling exactly. [16] :98 In string theory the pseudo-action receives much studied corrections that are classified into two types. The first are quantum corrections in terms of the string coupling and the second are string corrections terms of the Regge slope . These corrections play an important role in many moduli stabilisation scenarios.

Dimensional reduction of type IIA and type IIB supergravities necessarily results in the same nine-dimensional theory since only one superalgebra of this type exists in this dimension. [18] This is closely linked to the T-duality between the corresponding string theories.

Notes

  1. This theory has two left-handed Majorana–Weyl gravitions, with it being equivalent to the theory that has two right-handed gravitions.
  2. This is because the kinetic term has the form , which vanishes since for p-forms with odd . [11]

Related Research Articles

In the general theory of relativity, the Einstein field equations relate the geometry of spacetime to the distribution of matter within it.

In theoretical physics, the Rarita–Schwinger equation is the relativistic field equation of spin-3/2 fermions in a four-dimensional flat spacetime. It is similar to the Dirac equation for spin-1/2 fermions. This equation was first introduced by William Rarita and Julian Schwinger in 1941.

In physics, precisely in the study of the theory of general relativity and many alternatives to it, the post-Newtonian formalism is a calculational tool that expresses Einstein's (nonlinear) equations of gravity in terms of the lowest-order deviations from Newton's law of universal gravitation. This allows approximations to Einstein's equations to be made in the case of weak fields. Higher-order terms can be added to increase accuracy, but for strong fields, it may be preferable to solve the complete equations numerically. Some of these post-Newtonian approximations are expansions in a small parameter, which is the ratio of the velocity of the matter forming the gravitational field to the speed of light, which in this case is better called the speed of gravity. In the limit, when the fundamental speed of gravity becomes infinite, the post-Newtonian expansion reduces to Newton's law of gravity.

In mathematical physics, the gamma matrices, also called the Dirac matrices, are a set of conventional matrices with specific anticommutation relations that ensure they generate a matrix representation of the Clifford algebra It is also possible to define higher-dimensional gamma matrices. When interpreted as the matrices of the action of a set of orthogonal basis vectors for contravariant vectors in Minkowski space, the column vectors on which the matrices act become a space of spinors, on which the Clifford algebra of spacetime acts. This in turn makes it possible to represent infinitesimal spatial rotations and Lorentz boosts. Spinors facilitate spacetime computations in general, and in particular are fundamental to the Dirac equation for relativistic spin particles. Gamma matrices were introduced by Paul Dirac in 1928.

In differential geometry and mathematical physics, a spin connection is a connection on a spinor bundle. It is induced, in a canonical manner, from the affine connection. It can also be regarded as the gauge field generated by local Lorentz transformations. In some canonical formulations of general relativity, a spin connection is defined on spatial slices and can also be regarded as the gauge field generated by local rotations.

In theoretical physics, a source field is a background field coupled to the original field as

In physics and fluid mechanics, a Blasius boundary layer describes the steady two-dimensional laminar boundary layer that forms on a semi-infinite plate which is held parallel to a constant unidirectional flow. Falkner and Skan later generalized Blasius' solution to wedge flow, i.e. flows in which the plate is not parallel to the flow.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Post-Newtonian expansion</span> Method of approximation in general relativity

In general relativity, post-Newtonian expansions are used for finding an approximate solution of Einstein field equations for the metric tensor. The approximations are expanded in small parameters that express orders of deviations from Newton's law of universal gravitation. This allows approximations to Einstein's equations to be made in the case of weak fields. Higher-order terms can be added to increase accuracy, but for strong fields sometimes it is preferable to solve the complete equations numerically. This method is a common mark of effective field theories. In the limit, when the small parameters are equal to 0, the post-Newtonian expansion reduces to Newton's law of gravity.

The Newman–Penrose (NP) formalism is a set of notation developed by Ezra T. Newman and Roger Penrose for general relativity (GR). Their notation is an effort to treat general relativity in terms of spinor notation, which introduces complex forms of the usual variables used in GR. The NP formalism is itself a special case of the tetrad formalism, where the tensors of the theory are projected onto a complete vector basis at each point in spacetime. Usually this vector basis is chosen to reflect some symmetry of the spacetime, leading to simplified expressions for physical observables. In the case of the NP formalism, the vector basis chosen is a null tetrad: a set of four null vectors—two real, and a complex-conjugate pair. The two real members often asymptotically point radially inward and radially outward, and the formalism is well adapted to treatment of the propagation of radiation in curved spacetime. The Weyl scalars, derived from the Weyl tensor, are often used. In particular, it can be shown that one of these scalars— in the appropriate frame—encodes the outgoing gravitational radiation of an asymptotically flat system.

f(R) is a type of modified gravity theory which generalizes Einstein's general relativity. f(R) gravity is actually a family of theories, each one defined by a different function, f, of the Ricci scalar, R. The simplest case is just the function being equal to the scalar; this is general relativity. As a consequence of introducing an arbitrary function, there may be freedom to explain the accelerated expansion and structure formation of the Universe without adding unknown forms of dark energy or dark matter. Some functional forms may be inspired by corrections arising from a quantum theory of gravity. f(R) gravity was first proposed in 1970 by Hans Adolph Buchdahl. It has become an active field of research following work by Starobinsky on cosmic inflation. A wide range of phenomena can be produced from this theory by adopting different functions; however, many functional forms can now be ruled out on observational grounds, or because of pathological theoretical problems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lovelock theory of gravity</span>

In theoretical physics, Lovelock's theory of gravity (often referred to as Lovelock gravity) is a generalization of Einstein's theory of general relativity introduced by David Lovelock in 1971. It is the most general metric theory of gravity yielding conserved second order equations of motion in an arbitrary number of spacetime dimensions D. In this sense, Lovelock's theory is the natural generalization of Einstein's general relativity to higher dimensions. In three and four dimensions (D = 3, 4), Lovelock's theory coincides with Einstein's theory, but in higher dimensions the theories are different. In fact, for D > 4 Einstein gravity can be thought of as a particular case of Lovelock gravity since the Einstein–Hilbert action is one of several terms that constitute the Lovelock action.

The table of chords, created by the Greek astronomer, geometer, and geographer Ptolemy in Egypt during the 2nd century AD, is a trigonometric table in Book I, chapter 11 of Ptolemy's Almagest, a treatise on mathematical astronomy. It is essentially equivalent to a table of values of the sine function. It was the earliest trigonometric table extensive enough for many practical purposes, including those of astronomy. Since the 8th and 9th centuries, the sine and other trigonometric functions have been used in Islamic mathematics and astronomy, reforming the production of sine tables. Khwarizmi and Habash al-Hasib later produced a set of trigonometric tables.

In mathematical physics, the Belinfante–Rosenfeld tensor is a modification of the stress–energy tensor that is constructed from the canonical stress–energy tensor and the spin current so as to be symmetric yet still conserved.

In probability theory and statistics, the generalized multivariate log-gamma (G-MVLG) distribution is a multivariate distribution introduced by Demirhan and Hamurkaroglu in 2011. The G-MVLG is a flexible distribution. Skewness and kurtosis are well controlled by the parameters of the distribution. This enables one to control dispersion of the distribution. Because of this property, the distribution is effectively used as a joint prior distribution in Bayesian analysis, especially when the likelihood is not from the location-scale family of distributions such as normal distribution.

In string theory, the Ramond–Neveu–Schwarz (RNS) formalism is an approach to formulating superstrings in which the worldsheet has explicit superconformal invariance but spacetime supersymmetry is hidden, in contrast to the Green–Schwarz formalism where the latter is explicit. It was originally developed by Pierre Ramond, André Neveu and John Schwarz in the RNS model in 1971, which gives rise to type II string theories and can also give type I string theory. Heterotic string theories can also be acquired through this formalism by using a different worldsheet action. There are various ways to quantize the string within this framework including light-cone quantization, old canonical quantization, and BRST quantization. A consistent string theory is only acquired if the spectrum of states is restricted through a procedure known as a GSO projection, with this projection being automatically present in the Green–Schwarz formalism.

In supersymmetry, pure 4D supergravity describes the simplest four-dimensional supergravity, with a single supercharge and a supermultiplet containing a graviton and gravitino. The action consists of the Einstein–Hilbert action and the Rarita–Schwinger action. The theory was first formulated by Daniel Z. Freedman, Peter van Nieuwenhuizen, and Sergio Ferrara, and independently by Stanley Deser and Bruno Zumino in 1976. The only consistent extension to spacetimes with a cosmological constant is to anti-de Sitter space, first formulated by Paul Townsend in 1977. When additional matter supermultiplets are included in this theory, the result is known as matter-coupled 4D supergravity.

In supersymmetry, 4D supergravity is the theory of supergravity in four dimensions with a single supercharge. It contains exactly one supergravity multiplet, consisting of a graviton and a gravitino, but can also have an arbitrary number of chiral and vector supermultiplets, with supersymmetry imposing stringent constraints on how these can interact. The theory is primarily determined by three functions, those being the Kähler potential, the superpotential, and the gauge kinetic matrix. Many of its properties are strongly linked to the geometry associated to the scalar fields in the chiral multiplets. After the simplest form of this supergravity was first discovered, a theory involving only the supergravity multiplet, the following years saw an effort to incorporate different matter multiplets, with the general action being derived in 1982 by Eugène Cremmer, Sergio Ferrara, Luciano Girardello, and Antonie Van Proeyen.

In supersymmetry, eleven-dimensional supergravity is the theory of supergravity in the highest number of dimensions allowed for a supersymmetric theory. It contains a graviton, a gravitino, and a 3-form gauge field, with their interactions uniquely fixed by supersymmetry. Discovered in 1978 by Eugène Cremmer, Bernard Julia, and Joël Scherk, it quickly became a popular candidate for a theory of everything during the 1980s. However, interest in it soon faded due to numerous difficulties that arise when trying to construct physically realistic models. It came back to prominence in the mid-1990s when it was found to be the low energy limit of M-theory, making it crucial for understanding various aspects of string theory.

In supersymmetry, type IIA supergravity is the unique supergravity in ten dimensions with two supercharges of opposite chirality. It was first constructed in 1984 by a dimensional reduction of eleven-dimensional supergravity on a circle. The other supergravities in ten dimensions are type IIB supergravity, which has two supercharges of the same chirality, and type I supergravity, which has a single supercharge. In 1986 a deformation of the theory was discovered which gives mass to one of the fields and is known as massive type IIA supergravity. Type IIA supergravity plays a very important role in string theory as it is the low-energy limit of type IIA string theory.

In supersymmetry, type I supergravity is the theory of supergravity in ten dimensions with a single supercharge. It consists of a single supergravity multiplet and a single Yang–Mills multiplet. The full non-abelian action was first derived in 1983 by George Chapline and Nicholas Manton. Classically the theory can admit any gauge group, but a consistent quantum theory resulting in anomaly cancellation only exists if the gauge group is either or . Both these supergravities are realised as the low-energy limits of string theories, in particular of type I string theory and of the two heterotic string theories.

References

  1. 1 2 Schwarz, J.H. (1983). "Covariant field equations of chiral N = 2 D = 10 supergravity". Nuclear Physics B. 226 (2): 269–288. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90192-X.
  2. 1 2 Howe, P.S.; West, P.C. "The complete N =2, d = 10 supergravity". Nuclear Physics B. 238 (1): 181–220. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90472-3.
  3. Nahm, W. (1978). "Supersymmetries and their representations". Nuclear Physics B. 135 (1): 149–166. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90218-3.
  4. Schwarz, J.H. (1982). "Superstring theory". Physics Reports. 89 (3): 223–322. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(82)90087-4.
  5. 1 2 Bergshoeff, E.; Hull, C.M.; Ortin, T. (1995). "Duality in the type II superstring effective action". Nucl. Phys. B. 451: 547–578. arXiv: hep-th/9504081 . doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00367-2.
  6. Sezgin, E. (2023). "Survey of supergravities". arXiv: 2312.06754 [hep-th].
  7. 1 2 Becker, K.; Becker, M.; Schwarz, J.H. (2006). String Theory and M-Theory: A Modern Introduction. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0521860697.
  8. 1 2 Dall'Agata, G.; Zagermann, M. (2021). Supergravity: From First Principles to Modern Applications. Springer. ISBN   978-3662639788.
  9. 1 2 Townsend, P.K. (1995). "P-Brane Democracy". The World in Eleven Dimensions Supergravity, supermembranes and M-theory. CRC Press. ISBN   978-0750306720.
  10. 1 2 Freedman, D.Z.; Van Proeyen, A. (2012). Supergravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0521194013.
  11. Nakahara, M. (2003). Geometry, Topology and Physics (2 ed.). CRC Press. p. 198. ISBN   978-0750306065.
  12. Ashoke, S. (2016). "Covariant Action for Type IIB Supergravity". JHEP. 07: 017. arXiv: 1511.08220 . doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2016)017.
  13. Green, M.; Schwarz, J.H.; Witten, E. (1988). "13". Superstring Theory: 25th Anniversary Edition: Volume 2. Cambridge University Press. p. 314. ISBN   978-1107029132.
  14. 1 2 Ibanez, L.E.; Uranga, A.M. (2012). String Theory and Particle Physics: An Introduction to String Phenomenology. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0521517522.
  15. Hebecker, A. (2021). Naturalness, String Landscape and Multiverse. Springer. p. 147. ISBN   978-3030651503.
  16. 1 2 3 Polchinski, J. (1998). String Theory Volume II: Superstring Theory and Beyond. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-1551439761.
  17. Bergshoeff, E.; de Roo, M.; Janssen, B.; Ortin, T. (1999). "The Super D9-brane and its truncations". Nucl. Phys. B. 550: 289–302. arXiv: hep-th/9901055 . doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00214-X.
  18. Ortin, T. (2015). Gravity and Strings (2 ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 694–698. ISBN   978-0521768139.