Accession of Montenegro to the European Union | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Status | Candidate negotiating (screening complete) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earliest possible entry | 2028 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Constitution |
---|
Accession of Montenegro to the European Union is on the agenda for future enlargement of the EU.
After voting for independence from Serbia and Montenegro in 2006, Montenegro began the process of accession to the European Union by agreeing to a Stabilisation and Association Agreement with the EU, which officially came into force on 1 May 2010. Montenegro officially applied to join the EU on 15 December 2008. Membership negotiations began on 29 June 2012. [1] As of 2024, Montenegro's goal is to achieve membership of the EU by 2028. [2] [3] [4]
It is one of nine current EU candidate countries, together with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, Moldova, North Macedonia, Serbia, Turkey, and Ukraine. Among the six candidates with open negotiations (Montenegro, Serbia, Albania, North Macedonia, Moldova and Ukraine), the most advanced stage of the negotiations—defined as meeting the interim benchmarks for negotiation chapter 23 and 24 which allow the closing process of all negotiation chapters to start—has so far only been reached by Montenegro. [5] As of December 2024, twenty-seven out of 33 chapters remain to be closed.
Montenegro was granted potential candidate status in December 2002, when it was still in a union with Serbia. The EU recognized the new and independent country's European Perspective on 21 June 2003 at the Thessaloniki Summit. The adoption of the Thessaloniki Declaration of 2003 was a promise by the EU that the former Yugoslav republics along with Albania have "unequivocal support for future integration and full membership of these states in the Union". [6]
The European Commission recommended Montenegro as a candidate country on 9 November 2010. Montenegro officially was granted candidate status on 17 December 2010. [7]
Montenegro officially applied to join the EU on 15 December 2008.
On 23 April 2009, the Council invited the European Commission to submit its opinion on the application. The Commission presented Montenegro with a questionnaire to assess its application on 22 July 2009. [8] On 9 December 2009, Montenegro delivered its answers to the EC questionnaire. [9] In 2010, the Commission issued a favourable opinion on Montenegro's application, identifying seven key priorities that would need to be addressed for negotiations to begin.
The State Union of Serbia and Montenegro started the process of Accession to the European Union in November 2005, when negotiations over a Stabilisation and Association Agreement began. The EU concluded such agreements with states that wish to become members. In exchange for commitments to political, economic, trade, or human rights reform in the country, tariff-free access to some or all EU markets (industrial goods, agricultural products, etc.), and financial or technical assistance may be offered by the EU.
In May 2006, Montenegro voted for independence in a referendum, and the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro was dissolved. Serbia continued with the existing SAA negotiations, and separate negotiations were launched with Montenegro in September 2006. [10] [11] [12]
The Agreement was initiated on 15 March 2007 and signed on 15 October 2007. After all the 27 member-states of EU had ratified the SAA, it came into force on 1 May 2010. [13] [14]
N/A: Not applicable.
|
Montenegro's population is overwhelmingly pro-EU, with 76.2% being in favor according to polling and only 9.8% against, in October 2009. [31]
As of May 2023, the support of the citizens of Montenegro for the country's membership in the European Union reached a record high of 79.3%, according to a survey commissioned by the EU Delegation to Montenegro. The survey reported 75.9% of citizens believe that Montenegro will become a member of the EU. Over 90% of citizens would vote in the referendum, and 81.1% of those voting would support Montenegro's membership in the EU. [32]
Montenegro signed an agreement with the Bulgarian government in December 2007 in which Bulgaria would assist Montenegro with its Euro-Atlantic and EU integration for the following three years. [33] Reports at that time indicated Montenegro had ecological, judicial, and crime-related problems that may hinder its accession bid. [34]
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration of Montenegro has a special agency dedicated to accession to the EU, the Office for Assistance to the Chief Negotiator. The office's goal is to support the task of the Chief Negotiator for Montenegro's Accession to the EU, Zorka Kordić. On 27 July 2010, the Parliament passed a non-discrimination law that includes sexual orientation and gender identity as prohibited grounds of discrimination. This was one of the requirements the country had to meet for EU membership. [35]
In December 2011, the Council agreed to launch the accession process, with negotiations beginning on 29 June 2012.
The 2015 European Commission Progress Report on Montenegro noted that the country had made good progress toward meeting the benchmarks to join the EU, but the nation needed to address institutional frameworks, including competition policy, fighting against corruption and organized crime, and work in the areas of the environment and climate change. [36] [37] A 2015 study of the readiness to join the EU by using data from the World Bank Enterprise Survey collected from enterprise owners and management indicated that Montenegro passed three out of six business dimensions: basic infrastructure, goods delivery, and secure legal secure environment, but was lower than four other candidate nations in resources, technology support, and regulations. [37]
In its 2016 assessment of the accession progress, the European Parliament identified Montenegro as having the highest level of preparation for membership among the negotiating candidate nations. [38]
From 2014 through 2020, Montenegro received €279.1 million of developmental aid (not including the allocation for Cross-border Cooperation) from the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance, a funding mechanism for EU candidate countries. [39] The priority areas for these funds include: democracy and governance, rule of law and fundamental rights, environment and climate action, transport, competitiveness and innovation, education, employment and social policies, agriculture and rural development, regional and territorial cooperation. [39]
With all the negotiating chapters opened as of 2021, Montenegro had widespread support among EU members' officials with possible accession to the EU considered by 2025. [1]
There are twenty-seven open chapters, six have been provisionally closed, and two are in which there is nothing to adopt.
Clusters | Acquis Chapter | Status [40] | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Overview | Overview | 33 out of 33 | 6 out of 6 | 0 out of 6 |
Fundamentals | 23. Judiciary & Fundamental Rights | Opened | Opened | – |
24. Justice, Freedom & Security | Opened | |||
Economic criteria | – | |||
Functioning of democratic institutions | – | |||
Public administration reform | – | |||
5. Public Procurement | Opened | |||
18. Statistics | Opened | |||
32. Financial Control | Opened | |||
Internal Market | 1. Free Movement of Goods | Opened | Opened | – |
2. Freedom of Movement For Workers | Opened | |||
3. Right of Establishment & Freedom To Provide Services | Opened | |||
4. Free Movement of Capital | Opened | |||
6. Company Law | Opened | |||
7. Intellectual Property Law | Closed | |||
8. Competition Policy | Opened | |||
9. Financial Services | Opened | |||
28. Consumer & Health Protection | Opened | |||
Competitiveness and inclusive growth | 10. Information Society & Media | Closed | Opened | – |
16. Taxation | Opened | |||
17. Economic & Monetary Policy | Opened | |||
19. Social Policy & Employment | Opened | |||
20. Enterprise & Industrial Policy | Closed | |||
25. Science & Research | Closed | |||
26. Education & Culture | Closed | |||
29. Customs Union | Opened | |||
Green agenda and sustainable connectivity | 14. Transport Policy | Opened | Opened | – |
15. Energy | Opened | |||
21. Trans-European Networks | Opened | |||
27. Environment | Opened | |||
Resources, agriculture and cohesion | 11. Agriculture & Rural Development | Opened | Opened | – |
12. Food Safety, Veterinary & Phytosanitary Policy | Opened | |||
13. Fisheries | Opened | |||
22. Regional Policy & Coordination of Structural Instruments | Opened | |||
33. Financial & Budgetary Provisions | Opened | |||
External relations | 30. External Relations | Closed | Opened | – |
31. Foreign, Security & Defence Policy | Opened | |||
34. Institutions | – | – | – | |
35. Other Issues | – | – | – |
Progression | 33 / 33
| 33 / 33
| 33 / 33
| 6 / 33
| |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acquis chapter [41] | Screening Started | Screening Completed | Chapter Opened | Chapter Closed | |||||||||||||
1. Free Movement of Goods | 2013-01-14 | 2013-03-06 | 2017-06-20 | – | |||||||||||||
2. Freedom of Movement For Workers | 2013-05-13 | 2013-06-07 | 2017-12-11 [43] | – | |||||||||||||
3. Right of Establishment & Freedom To Provide Services | 2012-10-23 | 2012-11-30 | 2017-12-11 [43] | – | |||||||||||||
4. Free Movement of Capital | 2013-01-18 | 2013-02-21 | 2014-06-24 [44] | – | |||||||||||||
5. Public Procurement | 2012-09-27 | 2012-11-19 | 2013-12-18 | – | |||||||||||||
6. Company Law | 2012-10-02 | 2012-11-22 | 2013-12-18 | – | |||||||||||||
7. Intellectual Property Law | 2012-10-11 | 2012-11-21 | 2014-03-31 | 2024-12-16 [45] | |||||||||||||
8. Competition Policy | 2012-10-03 | 2012-12-04 | 2020-06-30 | – | |||||||||||||
9. Financial Services | 2013-04-17 | 2013-06-11 | 2015-06-22 [46] | – | |||||||||||||
10. Information Society & Media | 2012-12-06 | 2013-01-22 | 2014-03-31 | 2024-12-16 [45] | |||||||||||||
11. Agriculture & Rural Development | 2012-11-06 | 2012-12-13 | 2016-12-13 | – | |||||||||||||
12. Food Safety, Veterinary & Phytosanitary Policy | 2012-10-15 | 2013-02-01 | 2016-06-30 | – | |||||||||||||
13. Fisheries | 2013-03-14 | 2013-06-06 | 2016-06-30 | – | |||||||||||||
14. Transport Policy | 2013-04-22 | 2013-05-30 | 2015-12-21 | – | |||||||||||||
15. Energy | 2013-02-27 | 2013-04-11 | 2015-12-21 | – | |||||||||||||
16. Taxation | 2013-04-08 | 2013-04-30 | 2015-03-30 | – | |||||||||||||
17. Economic & Monetary Policy | 2013-01-10 | 2013-02-26 | 2018-06-25 | – | |||||||||||||
18. Statistics | 2013-06-03 | 2013-06-25 | 2014-12-16 [47] | – | |||||||||||||
19. Social Policy & Employment | 2013-01-23 | 2013-03-13 | 2016-12-13 | – | |||||||||||||
20. Enterprise & Industrial Policy | 2012-10-25 | 2012-11-28 | 2013-12-18 | 2024-12-16 [45] | |||||||||||||
21. Trans-European Networks | 2013-04-22 | 2013-05-30 | 2015-06-22 [46] | – | |||||||||||||
22. Regional Policy & Coordination of Structural Instruments | 2012-11-14 | 2012-12-18 | 2017-06-20 | – | |||||||||||||
23. Judiciary & Fundamental Rights | 2012-03-26 [48] | 2012-05-31 | 2013-12-18 | – | |||||||||||||
24. Justice, Freedom & Security | 2012-03-28 [48] | 2012-05-25 | 2013-12-18 | – | |||||||||||||
25. Science & Research | 2012-09-24 | 2012-09-25 | 2012-12-18 | 2012-12-18 [49] | |||||||||||||
26. Education & Culture | 2012-09-26 | 2012-11-16 | 2013-04-15 | 2013-04-15 [50] | |||||||||||||
27. Environment & Climate Change | 2013-02-04 | 2013-03-22 | 2018-12-10 [51] | – | |||||||||||||
28. Consumer & Health Protection | 2013-02-19 | 2013-04-16 | 2014-12-16 [47] | – | |||||||||||||
29. Customs Union | 2013-05-23 | 2013-06-21 | 2014-12-16 [47] | – | |||||||||||||
30. External Relations | 2013-05-14 | 2013-06-12 | 2015-03-30 | 2017-06-20 | |||||||||||||
31. Foreign, Security & Defence Policy | 2013-05-17 | 2013-06-27 | 2014-06-24 [44] | – | |||||||||||||
32. Financial Control | 2013-05-16 | 2013-06-19 | 2014-06-24 [44] | – | |||||||||||||
33. Financial & Budgetary Provisions | 2013-05-15 | 2013-06-26 | 2014-12-16 [47] | – | |||||||||||||
34. Institutions | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
35. Other Issues | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Acquis chapter | October 2011 [52] | October 2012 [53] | October 2013 [54] | October 2014 [55] | November 2015 [56] | November 2016 [57] | April 2018 [58] | May 2019 [59] | October 2020 [60] | October 2021 [61] | October 2022 [62] | November 2023 [63] | October 2024 [64] | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Free Movement of Goods | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | |
2. Freedom of Movement For Workers | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | |
3. Right of Establishment & Freedom To Provide Services | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Considerable efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | |
4. Free Movement of Capital | Some level of preparation | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | |
5. Public Procurement | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation† | Good level of preparation† | Good level of preparation† | |
6. Company Law | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | |
7. Intellectual Property Law | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Well advanced‡ | |
8. Competition Policy | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | |
9. Financial Services | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | |
10. Information Society & Media | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation | |
11. Agriculture & Rural Development | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Some level of preparation | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | |
12. Food Safety, Veterinary & Phytosanitary Policy | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Some level of preparation | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | |
13. Fisheries | Further efforts needed | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | |
14. Transport Policy | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation† | Good level of preparation† | Good level of preparation† | Good level of preparation† | Good level of preparation† | |
15. Energy | Moderately prepared | Early stage | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | |
16. Taxation | Further efforts needed | Early stage | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | |
17. Economic & Monetary Policy | Considerable efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | |
18. Statistics | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | |
19. Social Policy & Employment | Early stage | Considerable efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Early stage | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | |
20. Enterprise & Industrial Policy | Considerable efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation† | Good level of preparation† | Good level of preparation† | Good level of preparation† | Good level of preparation | |
21. Trans-European Networks | Further efforts needed | Early stage | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation† | Good level of preparation† | Good level of preparation† | Good level of preparation† | Good level of preparation† | |
22. Regional Policy & Coordination of Structural Instruments | Early stage | Considerable efforts needed | Early stage | Early stage | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | |
23. Judiciary & Fundamental Rights | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | |
24. Justice, Freedom & Security | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Further efforts needed | Early stage | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation† | |
25. Science & Research | Moderately prepared | Further efforts needed | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | |
26. Education & Culture | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | |
27. Environment & Climate Change | Considerable efforts needed | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | |
28. Consumer & Health Protection | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | No major difficulties expected | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | |
29. Customs Union | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | |
30. External Relations | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | No major difficulties expected | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | |
31. Foreign, Security & Defence Policy | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | No major difficulties expected | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | |
32. Financial Control | Some level of preparation | Early stage | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | |
33. Financial & Budgetary Provisions | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | |
34. Institutions | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | |
35. Other Issues | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | Nothing to adopt | |
Legend: Chapters in bold indicate completed chapters. † indicates chapters in which the European Commission has simultaneously awarded the chapter both "moderately prepared" AND "good level of preparation". ‡ indicates chapters in which the European Commission has simultaneously awarded the chapter both "good level of preparation" AND "well advanced". totally incompatible early stage considerable efforts needed some level of preparation further efforts needed moderately prepared no major difficulties expected good level of preparation well prepared / well advanced |
Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance
IPA I
€236 M
(2007-2013)
IPA II
€271 M
(2014-2020)
IPA III
c. €300 M
(2021-2027)
Montenegro has no currency of its own. As a constituent republic of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia following World War II, and later of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Montenegro used the Yugoslav dinar as its official currency. In November 1999, the government of Montenegro unilaterally designated the Deutsche Mark as its co-official currency with the dinar, and on 1 January 2001 the dinar officially ceased to be a legal tender in Montenegro. [65] [66] When the euro was introduced and the Deutsche Mark yielded in 2002, Montenegro followed suit and began using the euro as well, with no objection from the European Central Bank (ECB). [67] [68]
The European Commission and the ECB have since voiced their discontent over Montenegro's unilateral use of the euro on several occasions. [69] A statement attached to their Stabilisation and Association Agreement with the EU read: "unilateral introduction of the euro was not compatible with the Treaty." [70] The EU insists on the strict adherence to convergence criteria (such as spending at least 2 years in the ERMII system) which are not negotiable before euro adoption, but have not intervened to stop the unilateral adoption of the euro by Montenegro in 2002. [69] [71] The issue is expected to be resolved through the negotiations process. [69] The ECB has stated that the implications of unilateral euro adoption "would be spelled out at the latest in the event of possible negotiations on EU accession." [70]
Diplomats have suggested that it is unlikely Montenegro will be forced to withdraw the euro from circulation in their country. [67] [70] Radoje Žugić, Montenegro's Minister of Finance, has stated that "it would be extremely economically irrational to return to our currency and then later to again go back to the euro." [72] Instead, he hopes that Montenegro will be permitted to keep the euro and has promised "the government of Montenegro, will adopt some certain elements, which should fulfil the conditions for further use of the euro; such as adopting fiscal rules." [72]
On 1 January 2008, the visa facilitation and readmission agreements between Montenegro and the EU entered into force. [73] Montenegro was added to the list of visa exempt nationals on 19 December 2009, allowing their citizens to enter the Schengen Area and Cyprus without a visa when traveling with biometric passports. [74] The visa liberalisation process does not include travels to Ireland which, with the United Kingdom which left the EU during Montenegro's accession process, operate the Common Travel Area for visas outside of the Schengen Area. [75]
From May 2025 citizens of Montenegro will be required to register on the EU's ETIAS before entering the Schengen area. [76]
The European Union (EU) has expanded a number of times throughout its history by way of the accession of new member states to the Union. To join the EU, a state needs to fulfil economic and political conditions called the Copenhagen criteria, which require a stable democratic government that respects the rule of law, and its corresponding freedoms and institutions. According to the Maastricht Treaty, each current member state and the European Parliament must agree to any enlargement. The process of enlargement is sometimes referred to as European integration. This term is also used to refer to the intensification of co-operation between EU member states as national governments allow for the gradual harmonisation of national laws.
A European Union Association Agreement or simply Association Agreement (AA) is a treaty between the European Union, its Member States and a non-EU country or bloc of countries that governs bilateral relations. Areas frequently covered by such agreements include the development of political, trade, social, cultural and security links. The provision for an association agreement was included in the Treaty of Rome, which established the European Economic Community, as a means to enable co-operation of the Community with the United Kingdom, which had retreated from the treaty negotiations at the Messina Conference of 1955. According to the European External Action Service, for an agreement to be classified as an AA, it must meet several criteria:
1. The legal basis for [association agreements'] conclusion is Article 217 TFEU
2. Intention to establish close economic and political cooperation ;
3. Creation of paritary bodies for the management of the cooperation, competent to take decisions that bind the contracting parties;
4. Offering most favoured nation treatment;
5. Providing for a privileged relationship between the EC and its partner;
6. Since 1995 the clause on the respect of human rights and democratic principles is systematically included and constitutes an essential element of the agreement;
7. In a large number of cases, the association agreement replaces a cooperation agreement thereby intensifying the relations between the partners.
A customs union is the principal area of robust formal agreement between the Principality of Andorra and the European Union (EU). Andorra borders two EU member states: France and Spain.
In talks with countries that have expressed a wish to join the European Union, the EU typically concludes Association Agreements in exchange for commitments to political, economic, trade, or human rights reform in that country. In exchange, the country may be offered tariff-free access to some or all EU markets, and financial or technical assistance.
The most recent enlargement of the European Union saw Croatia become the European Union's 28th member state on 1 July 2013. The country applied for EU membership in 2003, and the European Commission recommended making it an official candidate in early 2004. Candidate country status was granted to Croatia by the European Council in mid-2004. The entry negotiations, while originally set for March 2005, began in October that year together with the screening process.
International relations between the European Union (EU) and Ukraine are shaped through the Ukraine–European Union Association Agreement and the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA). Ukraine is a priority partner within the Eastern Partnership and the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP). The EU and Ukraine developed an increasingly close relationship, going beyond co-operation, to gradual economic integration and deepening of political co-operation. On 23 June 2022, the European Council granted Ukraine the status of a candidate for accession to the European Union.
The Commissioner for Neighbourhood and Enlargement is the member of the European Commission in charge of overseeing the accession process of prospective new member states and relations with those bordering the European Union (EU). The present commissioner, since December 2024, is Marta Kos.
Montenegro is a country in Southeast Europe, which is neither a member of the European Union (EU) nor the Eurozone; it does not have a formal monetary agreement with the EU either. However, it is one of the two territories that has unilaterally adopted the euro in 2002 as its de facto domestic currency and legal tender.
Albania is on the current agenda for future enlargement of the European Union (EU). It applied for EU membership on 28 April 2009, and has since June 2014 been an official candidate for accession. The Council of the European Union decided in March 2020 to open accession negotiations with Albania.
The accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the European Union (EU) is the stated aim of the present relations between the two entities. Bosnia and Herzegovina has been recognised by the European Union as a "candidate country" for accession since the decision of the European Council in 2022 and is on the current agenda for future enlargement of the EU. Bosnia and Herzegovina takes part in the Stabilisation and Association Process and trade relations are regulated by an Interim Agreement.
Serbia applied to join the European Union (EU) in 2009 and has been a candidate for membership since 2012, along with nine other states. Serbia is the largest country in Southeast Europe seeking entry into the EU.
Kosovo adopted the euro as its de facto legal tender in 2002 despite the territory not being a member of the Eurozone or the European Union. This succeeded its use of German marks from 1999.
Foreign relations of Kosovo are accomplished by efforts of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Kosovo. Kosovo operates 33 embassies abroad and is host to 22 embassies in Pristina. Kosovo has membership in several international organisations.
The accession of Kosovo to the European Union (EU) is on the current agenda for future enlargement of the EU. Kosovo is currently recognized by the EU as a potential candidate for accession.
There are currently nine states recognized as candidates for membership of the European Union: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, Turkey, and Ukraine. Kosovo formally submitted its application for membership in 2022 and is considered a potential candidate by the European Union. Due to multiple factors, talks with Turkey are at an effective standstill since December 2016.
The accession of North Macedonia to the European Union has been on the current agenda for future enlargement of the EU since 2005, when it became an official candidate for accession. The then Republic of Macedonia submitted its membership application in 2004, thirteen years after its independence from Yugoslavia. It is one of nine current EU candidate countries, together with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, Moldova, Montenegro, Serbia, Turkey and Ukraine.
On 1 January 2007, Bulgaria and Romania became member states of the European Union (EU) in the fifth wave of EU enlargement.
The Belgrade–Pristina negotiations are a series of European Union-facilitated talks between the governments of Serbia and Kosovo. Serbia claims Kosovo as its southern province under United Nations administration, and rejects its independence. Kosovo considers Serbia as a neighbouring state. The negotiations began in March 2011, three years after Kosovo declared independence. They are the first negotiations between the two entities since Kosovo declared independence in February 2008.
Since the 1980s, member states of the European Union have started to harmonise aspects of the designs of their ordinary passports, as well as common security features and biometrics.
The First Agreement of Principles Governing the Normalisation of Relations, informally known as the Brussels Agreement, is an agreement to normalize relations between the governments of Serbia and Kosovo. The agreement, negotiated and concluded in Brussels under the auspices of the European Union, was signed on 19 April 2013. Negotiations were led by Serbian Prime Minister Ivica Dačić and Kosovo Prime Minister Hashim Thaçi, mediated by EU High Representative Catherine Ashton. The government of Serbia does not recognize Kosovo as a sovereign state, but began normalising relations with the government of Kosovo as a result of the agreement. In Belgrade, the agreement was criticized by protestors as a convalidation of Kosovo independence.
As of 21 December 2015, twenty-two negotiating Chapters, including the rule of law Chapters, 23 – Judiciary and fundamental rights and 24 – Justice, freedom and security, have been opened, out which two Chapters (25 – Science and research and 26 – Education and culture) have been provisionally closed.