Accession of Serbia to the European Union | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Status | Candidate negotiating | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Serbiaportal |
Serbia applied to join the European Union (EU) in 2009 and has been a candidate for membership since 2012, along with nine other states. Serbia is the largest country in Southeast Europe seeking entry into the EU. [4] [5] [6]
A poll in June 2023 found that only 33% of Serbs wanted to join the EU. [7] Obstacles for accession include the requirement to recognize statehood for Kosovo, foreign policy alignment with Russia, democratic backsliding including allegations of fraud in elections in December 2023, and domestic policies such as rule of law and media freedom. [8] [5] [9]
Negotiations with the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (later the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro) intensified following the overthrow of Slobodan Milošević in 2000, and the EU officially declared the Balkan states potential candidates for membership following the EU-Western Balkans Summit in Thessaloniki on 21 June 2003. [10]
On 7 November 2007, Serbia initiated a Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) with the European Union. The SAA came into force on 1 September 2013.
N/A: Not applicable.
|
The European Commission recommended making Serbia an official candidate on 12 October 2011. The Council also made the recommendation on 28 February 2012.
Serbia received full candidate status on 1 March 2012. In December 2013, the Council of the European Union approved opening negotiations for Serbia's accession.
Serbia officially applied for European Union membership on 22 December 2009.
Until 2020, Serbia had been receiving €2.9bn of developmental aid from the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance, a funding mechanism for EU candidate countries.
Date | Event |
---|---|
1998 | The EU Council of Ministers establishes political and economic conditionality for the development of bilateral relations. |
21 June 2003 | The Stabilisation and Association Process is confirmed as the EU policy for the Western Balkans. The EU's perspective on these countries is confirmed. |
October 2004 | European Council conclusions open up a process for a Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SSA). |
October 2005 | Negotiations for a Stabilisation and Association Agreement are launched. |
3 May 2006 | SAA negotiations called off due to lack of progress on cooperation with the ICTY. |
13 June 2007 | SAA negotiations with Serbia resumed, following a clear commitment by the country to achieve full cooperation with the ICTY. |
1 November 2007 | Serbia's SAA is initialed. |
1 January 2008 | Entry into force of the Visa Facilitation and Readmission Agreement between Serbia and the EU. |
18 February 2008 | Council adopts revised European partnership for Serbia. |
29 April 2008 | The Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) and Interim agreement on trade and trade-related issues between Serbia and the EU are signed in Luxembourg. |
19 December 2009 | Visa requirement lifted for Serbs travelling to Schengen countries. |
22 December 2009 | Serbia officially applies for membership in the European Union. |
14 June 2010 | EU members decide to start SAA ratification process |
31 January 2011 | Serbia replies to Commission questionnaire |
14 October 2011 | European Commission delivers its Opinion on Serbia's EU membership application, granting candidate status based on one key priority. |
1 March 2012 | European Council grants Serbia official candidate status for EU membership |
28 June 2013 | European Council endorsed the commission's recommendation to open negotiations with Serbia |
1 September 2013 | Entry into force of the EU-Serbia Stabilisation and Association Agreement |
25 September 2013 | Screening of the acquis started. |
17 December 2013 | Council adopted the negotiating framework with Serbia and agreed to hold the 1st Intergovernmental Conference with Serbia in January 2014 |
21 January 2014 | 1st EU-Serbia Intergovernmental Conference held, signaling the official start of negotiations. |
25 March 2015 | All EU acquis screenings are completed. |
14 December 2015 | Opening of Chapters 32 "financial control" and 35 "other issues – Item 1: Normalisation of relations between Serbia and Kosovo*" |
18 July 2016 | Opening of Chapters 23 "Judiciary and fundamental rights" and 24 "Justice, freedom and security" |
13 December 2016 | Opening of Chapters 5, Public procurement, and 25, Science and Research. Chapter 25, Science and Research, provisionally closed. |
27 February 2017 | Opening of Chapters 20, Enterprise and industrial policy, and 26, Education and culture. Chapter 26, Education and culture, is provisionally closed. |
20 June 2017 | Opening of Chapters 7, Intellectual property law, and 29, Customs Union. |
11 December 2017 | Opening of Chapters 6, Company law, and 30, External relations. |
25 June 2018 | Opening of Chapters 13, Fisheries, and 33, Financial and budgetary provisions. |
10 December 2018 | Opening of Chapters 17, Economic and monetary policy, and 18, Statistics. |
27 June 2019 | Opening of Chapter 9, Financial services |
9 December 2019 | Opening of Chapter 4, Free Movement of Capital |
1 February 2021 | New Methodology comes into effect |
14 December 2021 | Opening of Chapters 14, Transport Policy, 15, Energy, 21, Trans-European Networks and 27, Environment and Climate Change |
Serbia refused to join international sanctions against Russia following its 2022 invasion of Ukraine. In response, the European Parliament passed a resolution that stated in part it "strongly regrets Serbia’s non-alignment with EU sanctions against Russia, which damages its EU accession process." [27]
The biggest obstacle to Serbia's accession to the EU is its strained relationship with Kosovo, [5] which escalated after the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence. The Serbian government has declared that the status of Kosovo should not be tied to the EU negotiations. In September 2012, the EU Enlargement Commissioner, Štefan Füle, denied that the European Union would insist on Serbia's recognition of Kosovo before it can join the organisation. [28]
On 19 April 2013, the governments of Kosovo and Serbia completed the Brussels Agreement, which was hailed as a major step towards normalising relations and enabled the start of EU accession talks with Serbia. [29] In November 2013, Kosovo's Minister of Foreign Affairs Enver Hoxhaj suggested that the EU should approve the accession of Kosovo and Serbia simultaneously due to concerns that if Serbia was admitted first they could veto Kosovo's membership. [30] However, Serbia's accession negotiations were not halted.
In March 2021, the European Parliament adopted a report on Serbia, which, amongst other things, emphasized that the normalization of relationships between Serbia and Kosovo is "a priority and a requirement for EU accession." [31]
Progression | 34 / 34
| 34 / 34
| 22 / 34
| 2 / 34
| ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acquis Chapter [32] | Screening Started | Screening Completed | Chapter Opened | Chapter Closed | ||||||||||||||
Overview | 34 out of 34 | 34 out of 34 | 22 out of 34 | 2 out of 34 | ||||||||||||||
1. Free Movement of Goods | 2014-06-17 | 2014-09-12 | – | – | ||||||||||||||
2. Freedom of Movement For Workers | 2014-01-23 | 2014-03-25 | – | – | ||||||||||||||
3. Right of Establishment & Freedom To Provide Services | 2014-01-30 | 2014-03-13 | – | – | ||||||||||||||
4. Free Movement of Capital | 2014-10-13 | 2014-12-15 | 2019-12-10 | – | ||||||||||||||
5. Public Procurement | 2014-03-21 | 2014-05-13 | 2016-12-13 | – | ||||||||||||||
6. Company Law | 2014-12-11 | 2015-02-05 | 2017-12-11 | – | ||||||||||||||
7. Intellectual Property Law | 2014-09-24 | 2014-11-13 | 2017-06-20 | – | ||||||||||||||
8. Competition Policy | 2014-03-31 | 2014-11-05 | – | – | ||||||||||||||
9. Financial Services | 2015-01-21 | 2015-03-17 | 2019-06-27 | – | ||||||||||||||
10. Information Society & Media | 2014-05-22 | 2014-07-02 | – | – | ||||||||||||||
11. Agriculture & Rural Development | 2014-03-18 | 2014-09-16 | – | – | ||||||||||||||
12. Food Safety, Veterinary & Phytosanitary Policy | 2014-02-03 | 2014-10-24 | – | – | ||||||||||||||
13. Fisheries | 2014-09-30 | 2014-11-14 | 2018-06-25 | – | ||||||||||||||
14. Transport Policy | 2014-12-16 | 2015-02-27 | 2021-12-14 | – | ||||||||||||||
15. Energy | 2014-04-29 | 2014-06-12 | 2021-12-14 | – | ||||||||||||||
16. Taxation | 2014-10-14 | 2015-03-06 | – | – | ||||||||||||||
17. Economic & Monetary Policy | 2014-12-02 | 2015-03-12 | 2018-12-10 | – | ||||||||||||||
18. Statistics | 2014-05-20 | 2014-11-26 | 2018-12-10 | – | ||||||||||||||
19. Social Policy & Employment | 2014-02-10 | 2014-06-26 | – | – | ||||||||||||||
20. Enterprise & Industrial Policy | 2014-04-03 | 2014-07-02 | 2017-02-27 | – | ||||||||||||||
21. Trans-European Networks | 2014-04-29 | 2015-02-27 | 2021-12-14 | – | ||||||||||||||
22. Regional Policy & Coordination of Structural Instruments | 2014-10-01 | 2015-01-29 | – | – | ||||||||||||||
23. Judiciary & Fundamental Rights | 2013-09-25 | 2013-12-10 | 2016-07-18 | – | ||||||||||||||
24. Justice, Freedom & Security | 2013-10-02 | 2013-12-13 | 2016-07-18 | – | ||||||||||||||
25. Science & Research | 2014-10-06 | 2014-12-01 | 2016-12-13 | 2016-12-13 | ||||||||||||||
26. Education & Culture | 2014-02-20 | 2014-04-04 | 2017-02-27 | 2017-02-27 | ||||||||||||||
27. Environment | 2014-09-15 | 2014-11-21 | 2021-12-14 | – | ||||||||||||||
28. Consumer & Health Protection | 2014-12-04 | 2015-02-04 | – | – | ||||||||||||||
29. Customs Union | 2014-03-26 | 2014-06-04 | 2017-06-20 | – | ||||||||||||||
30. External Relations | 2014-07-02 | 2014-10-09 | 2017-12-11 | – | ||||||||||||||
31. Foreign, Security & Defence Policy | 2014-07-15 | 2014-10-10 | – | – | ||||||||||||||
32. Financial Control | 2013-10-17 | 2013-11-26 | 2015-12-14 | – | ||||||||||||||
33. Financial & Budgetary Provisions | 2015-01-27 | 2015-03-24 | 2018-06-25 | – | ||||||||||||||
34. Institutions | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||
35. Other Issues: Relations with Kosovo* | 2014-01-22 | 2015-03-25 | 2015-12-14 | – | ||||||||||||||
Progression | 34 / 34
| 34 / 34
| 22 / 34
| 2 / 34
|
Progression |
| Some level of preparation 5 / 34 Moderately prepared21 / 34 Good level of preparation7 / 34 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acquis chapter | Chapter Status | Acquis Status | |||||||
1. Free Movement of Goods | Unopened | Moderately prepared | |||||||
2. Freedom of Movement For Workers | Unopened | Moderately prepared | |||||||
3. Right of Establishment & Freedom To Provide Services | Unopened | Moderately prepared | |||||||
4. Free Movement of Capital | Open | Moderately prepared | |||||||
5. Public Procurement | Open | Moderately prepared | |||||||
6. Company Law | Open | Good level of preparation | |||||||
7. Intellectual Property Law | Open | Good level of preparation | |||||||
8. Competition Policy | Unopened | Moderately prepared | |||||||
9. Financial Services | Open | Moderately prepared | |||||||
10. Information Society & Media | Unopened | Moderately prepared | |||||||
11. Agriculture & Rural Development | Unopened | Some level of preparation | |||||||
12. Food Safety, Veterinary & Phytosanitary Policy | Unopened | Moderately prepared | |||||||
13. Fisheries | Open | Moderately prepared | |||||||
14. Transport Policy | Open | Good level of preparation | |||||||
15. Energy | Open | Moderately prepared | |||||||
16. Taxation | Unopened | Moderately prepared | |||||||
17. Economic & Monetary Policy | Open | Good level of preparation† | |||||||
18. Statistics | Open | Moderately prepared | |||||||
19. Social Policy & Employment | Unopened | Moderately prepared | |||||||
20. Enterprise & Industrial Policy | Open | Moderately prepared | |||||||
21. Trans-European Networks | Open | Moderately prepared | |||||||
22. Regional Policy & Coordination of Structural Instruments | Unopened | Moderately prepared | |||||||
23. Judiciary & Fundamental Rights | Open | Some level of preparation | |||||||
24. Justice, Freedom & Security | Open | Some level of preparation | |||||||
25. Science & Research | Chapter Closed | Good level of preparation | |||||||
26. Education & Culture | Chapter Closed | Good level of preparation | |||||||
27. Environment & Climate Change | Open | Some level of preparation | |||||||
28. Consumer & Health Protection | Unopened | Moderately prepared | |||||||
29. Customs Union | Open | Good level of preparation | |||||||
30. External Relations | Open | Moderately prepared | |||||||
31. Foreign, Security & Defence Policy | Unopened | Moderately prepared | |||||||
32. Financial Control | Open | Moderately prepared | |||||||
33. Financial & Budgetary Provisions | Open | Some level of preparation | |||||||
34. Institutions | Currently not applicable for Serbia | Currently not applicable for Serbia | |||||||
35. Other Issues – Normalisation with Kosovo | Open | Further efforts needed | |||||||
Legend: Chapters in bold indicate completed chapters. † indicates chapters in which the European Commission has simultaneously awarded the chapter both "moderately prepared" AND "good level of preparation". totally incompatible early stage considerable efforts needed some level of preparation further efforts needed moderately prepared no major difficulties expected good level of preparation well prepared / well advanced |
Acquis chapter | 2010 [34] | 2012 [35] | 2013 [36] | 2014 [37] | 2015 [38] | 2016 [39] | 2018 [40] | 2019 [41] | 2020 [42] | 2021 [43] | 2022 [44] | 2023 [45] | 2024 [46] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Free Movement of Goods | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
2. Freedom of Movement For Workers | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
3. Right of Establishment & Freedom To Provide Services | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
4. Free Movement of Capital | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
5. Public Procurement | Considerable efforts needed | Considerable efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
6. Company Law | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation |
7. Intellectual Property Law | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation |
8. Competition Policy | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
9. Financial Services | Considerable efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
10. Information Society & Media | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
11. Agriculture & Rural Development | Early stage | Early stage | Considerable efforts needed | Considerable efforts needed | Early stage | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation |
12. Food Safety, Veterinary & Phytosanitary Policy | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
13. Fisheries | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
14. Transport Policy | Some level of preparation | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation |
15. Energy | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
16. Taxation | Further efforts needed | Considerable efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation† |
17. Economic & Monetary Policy | Further efforts needed | Considerable efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation† | Good level of preparation† |
18. Statistics | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation† |
19. Social Policy & Employment | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
20. Enterprise & Industrial Policy | Some level of preparation | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
21. Trans-European Networks | Considerable efforts needed | Considerable efforts needed | Considerable efforts needed | Some level of preparation | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation† |
22. Regional Policy & Coordination of Structural Instruments | Considerable efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
23. Judiciary & Fundamental Rights | Considerable efforts needed | Some level of preparation | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation |
24. Justice, Freedom & Security | Considerable efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Moderately prepared†† |
25. Science & Research | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation |
26. Education & Culture | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Some level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation |
27. Environment | Early stage | Considerable efforts needed | Considerable efforts needed | Some level of preparation | Early stage | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation |
28. Consumer & Health Protection | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
29. Customs Union | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation | Good level of preparation |
30. External Relations | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
31. Foreign, Security & Defence Policy | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Further efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
32. Financial Control | Early stage | Early stage | Considerable efforts needed | Considerable efforts needed | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared | Moderately prepared |
33. Financial & Budgetary Provisions | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Early stage | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation | Some level of preparation |
34. Institutions | Currently not applicable for Serbia | Currently not applicable for Serbia | Currently not applicable for Serbia | Currently not applicable for Serbia | Currently not applicable for Serbia | Currently not applicable for Serbia | Currently not applicable for Serbia | Currently not applicable for Serbia | Currently not applicable for Serbia | Currently not applicable for Serbia | Currently not applicable for Serbia | Currently not applicable for Serbia | Currently not applicable for Serbia |
35. Other Issues Normalisation with Kosovo | Early stage | Early stage | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed | Further efforts needed |
Legend: Chapters in bold indicate completed chapters. † indicates chapters in which the European Commission has simultaneously awarded the chapter both "moderately prepared" AND "good level of preparation". †† indicates chapters in which the European Commission has simultaneously awarded the chapter both "some level of preparation" AND "moderately prepared". totally incompatible early stage considerable efforts needed some level of preparation further efforts needed moderately prepared no major difficulties expected good level of preparation well prepared / well advanced |
Clusters | Acquis Chapter | State of Play | Cluster Opened | Cluster Closed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Overview | Overview | 22 out of 34 | 3 out of 6 | 0 out of 6 |
Fundamentals | 23. Judiciary & Fundamental Rights | Opened | Opened | – |
24. Justice, Freedom & Security | Opened | |||
Economic criteria | – | |||
Functioning of democratic institutions | – | |||
Public administration reform | – | |||
5. Public Procurement | Opened | |||
18. Statistics | Opened | |||
32. Financial Control | Opened | |||
Internal Market | 1. Free Movement of Goods | Serbia working on fulfilment of opening benchmarks | – | – |
2. Freedom of Movement For Workers | Draft EU Common Position in Council | |||
3. Right of Establishment & Freedom To Provide Services | Draft EU Common Position in Council | |||
4. Free Movement of Capital | Opened | |||
6. Company Law | Opened | |||
7. Intellectual Property Law | Opened | |||
8. Competition Policy | Serbia working on fulfillment of opening benchmarks | |||
9. Financial Services | Opened | |||
28. Consumer & Health Protection | Draft EU Common Position in Council | |||
Competitiveness and inclusive growth | 10. Information Society & Media | Draft EU Common Position in Council | – | – |
16. Taxation | Opening Benchmarks Assessment Report in Council | |||
17. Economic & Monetary Policy | Opened | |||
19. Social Policy & Employment | Opening Benchmarks Assessment Report in Council | |||
20. Enterprise & Industrial Policy | Opened | |||
25. Science & Research | Closed | |||
26. Education & Culture | Closed | |||
29. Customs Union | Opened | |||
Green agenda and sustainable connectivity | 14. Transport Policy | Opened | Opened | – |
15. Energy | Opened | |||
21. Trans-European Networks | Opened | |||
27. Environment | Opened | |||
Resources, agriculture and cohesion | 11. Agriculture & Rural Development | Opening Benchmarks Assessment Report in Council | – | – |
12. Food Safety, Veterinary & Phytosanitary Policy | Serbia working on fulfilment of opening benchmarks | |||
13. Fisheries | Opened | |||
22. Regional Policy & Coordination of Structural Instruments | Opening Benchmarks Assessment Report in Council | |||
33. Financial & Budgetary Provisions | Opened | |||
External relations | 30. External Relations | Opened | – | – |
31. Foreign, Security & Defence Policy | Screening Report in Council | |||
34. Institutions | – | Opened | Closed | |
35. Other Issues: Relations with Kosovo* | Opened | Opened | – |
Serbia was initially supportive of accession in the past due to better relationships with countries in the European Union, as well as for economic reasons. In the last decades because of the support of Kosovo's independence by most European countries, the economic crisis, the better relationships with the United States in addition to giving sanctions against Russia during the Russian invasion in Ukraine, support for EU membership went down. Serbia has become more opposed to the Western NATO bloc and prefer better ties and relationships with, for example, Russia for its shared Eastern Orthodox Christian Slavic traditions and China with its large economy and similar soft alliance with Russia.[ citation needed ]
A February 2024 NSPM poll recorded that 42.8% were for joining the EU, with 36.8% against. The rest were undecided or refused to give the answer. Another poll recorded the question "Would you support joining the EU if recognizing the independence of Kosovo was a condition for joining it?", 76% answered no, compared to 12.2% who said yes. [48]
An October 2023 Smart Plus poll found that if a referendum on joining the EU would take place, 44% would vote in favour of joining the EU, with 30% voting against, 15% undecided and 10% abstaining. [49]
Date | Question | Yes | No | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|
September 2002 [50] | Join EU? | 68% | 13% | 19% |
December 2003 [50] | Join EU? | 72% | 8% | 20% |
September 2004 [50] | Join EU? | 71% | 12% | 17% |
September 2005 [50] | Join EU? | 64% | 12% | 24% |
September 2006 [50] | Join EU? | 70% | 12% | 18% |
June 2007 [51] | Join EU? | 69% | 15% | 15% |
June 2008 [52] | Join EU? | 67% | 12% | 21% |
October 2008 [52] | Join EU? | 65% | – | – |
December 2008 [53] | Join EU? | 61% | 13% | 26% |
May 2009 [54] | Join EU? | 61% | 17% | 22% |
December 2009 [55] | Join EU? | 65% | 14% | 21% |
June 2010 [56] | Join EU? | 65% | 15% | 20% |
December 2010 [57] | Join EU? | 57% | 18% | 25% |
May 2011 [52] | Join EU? | 55% | 27% | 18% |
June 2011 [58] [59] | Join EU? | 53% | 24% | 23% |
September 2011 [60] [61] | Join EU? | 46% | 37% | 17% |
December 2011 [62] [63] | Join EU? | 51% | 28% | 21% |
December 2012 [64] | Join EU? | 41% | 31% | 27% |
July 2013 [65] | Join EU? | 50% | 24% | 26% |
December 2013 [66] | Join EU? | 51% | 22% | 27% |
June 2014 [67] | Join EU? | 46% | 19% | 35% |
December 2014 [68] | Join EU? | 44% | 25% | 31% |
June 2015 [69] | Join EU? | 49% | 28% | 23% |
December 2015 [70] | Join EU? | 48% | 28% | 24% |
June 2016 [71] | Join EU? | 41% | 24% | 35% |
December 2016 [72] | Join EU? | 47% | 29% | 24% |
June 2017 [73] | Join EU? | 49% | 27% | 24% |
December 2017 [74] | Join EU? | 52% | 24% | 24% |
July 2018 [75] | Join EU? | 55% | 21% | 24% |
December 2018 [76] | Join EU? | 55% | 25% | 20% |
July 2019 [77] | Join EU? | 53% | 25% | 22% |
December 2019 [78] | Join EU? | 54% | 24% | 22% |
December 2022 [79] | Join EU? | 43% | 32% | 25% |
Date | Agency | Question | Yes | No | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 [80] | Gallup Balkan Monitor | Join EU? | 61% | – | – |
October 2008 [81] | Strategic Marketing | Join EU? | 61% | – | – |
November 2010 [82] | Gallup Balkan Monitor | Join EU? | 63% | – | – |
March 2012 [83] | B92/Ipsos Strategic Marketing | Join EU? | 49% | 34% | 5% |
July 2013 [84] | Ipsos Strategic Marketing | Join EU? | 53% | – | – |
December 2014 [85] | EU Delegation to Serbia | Join EU? | 57% | 28% | 15% |
December 2014 [86] | Eurobarometer | Join EU? | 58% | 26% | 16% |
August 2017 [87] | NSPM | Join EU? | 51.2% | 36.3% | 12.5% |
March 2022 [88] | IPSOS | Join EU? | 35% | 44% | 21% |
June 2022 [89] | Demostat | Join EU? | 34% | 51% | 15% |
October 2022 [90] | NSPM | Join EU? | 34.7% | 48.8% | 16.5% |
January 2023 [91] | NSPM | Join EU? | 35.5% | 47.7% | 16.8% |
April 2023 [92] | NSPM | Join EU? | 42.7% | 44.2% | 13.1% |
May 2023 [93] | NSPM | Join EU? | 40.6% | 45.9% | 13.5% |
June 2023 [94] | NSPM | Join EU? | 43.7% | 46.7% | 9.6% |
October 2023 [49] | Smart Plus | Join EU? | 44% | 30% | 15% |
February 2024 [48] | NSPM | Join EU? | 42.8% | 36.8% | 20.4% |
On 1 January 2008, the Visa Facilitation and Readmission Agreement between Serbia and the EU came into effect. On 19 December 2009, Visa requirements were lifted for Serbs travelling to Schengen countries.
The European Union (EU) has expanded a number of times throughout its history by way of the accession of new member states to the Union. To join the EU, a state needs to fulfil economic and political conditions called the Copenhagen criteria, which require a stable democratic government that respects the rule of law, and its corresponding freedoms and institutions. According to the Maastricht Treaty, each current member state and the European Parliament must agree to any enlargement. The process of enlargement is sometimes referred to as European integration. This term is also used to refer to the intensification of co-operation between EU member states as national governments allow for the gradual harmonisation of national laws.
Vojislav Koštunica is a Serbian former politician who served as the last president of FR Yugoslavia from 2000 to 2003 and as the prime minister of Serbia from 2004 to 2008.
Boris Tadić is a Serbian politician who served as the president of Serbia from 2004 to 2012.
The government of Serbia, formally the Government of the Republic of Serbia, commonly abbreviated to Serbian Government, is the executive branch of government in Serbia.
In talks with countries that have expressed a wish to join the European Union, the EU typically concludes Association Agreements in exchange for commitments to political, economic, trade, or human rights reform in that country. In exchange, the country may be offered tariff-free access to some or all EU markets, and financial or technical assistance.
Albania is on the current agenda for future enlargement of the European Union (EU). It applied for EU membership on 28 April 2009, and has since June 2014 been an official candidate for accession. The Council of the European Union decided in March 2020 to open accession negotiations with Albania.
The accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the European Union (EU) is the stated aim of the present relations between the two entities. Bosnia and Herzegovina has been recognised by the European Union as a "candidate country" for accession since the decision of the European Council in 2022 and is on the current agenda for future enlargement of the EU. Bosnia and Herzegovina takes part in the Stabilisation and Association Process and trade relations are regulated by an Interim Agreement.
Accession of Montenegro to the European Union is on the agenda for future enlargement of the EU.
The accession of Kosovo to the European Union (EU) is on the current agenda for future enlargement of the EU. Kosovo is currently recognized by the EU as a potential candidate for accession.
The accession of North Macedonia to the European Union has been on the current agenda for future enlargement of the EU since 2005, when it became an official candidate for accession. The then Republic of Macedonia submitted its membership application in 2004, thirteen years after its independence from Yugoslavia. It is one of nine current EU candidate countries, together with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, Moldova, Montenegro, Serbia, Turkey and Ukraine.
Kosovo unilaterally self proclaimed independence from Serbia in 2008, a move which Serbia strongly rejects. Serbia has not recognized Kosovo as an independent state and continues to claim it as the Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija. However, differences and disputes remain, while North Kosovo partially remains under Serbian influence. Initially there were no relations between the two; but in the following years there has been increased dialogue and cooperation between the two sides.
The statistical regions of Serbia are regulated by the Law of the Regional Development and the Law of the Official Statistics. Serbia is divided into five statistical regions which are chiefly used for statistical purposes, such as regular statistical data published by the Statistical Office as well as census data. The regions encompass one or multiple administrative districts each.
The United Regions of Serbia was a regionalist, liberal-conservative political party in Serbia. It was founded on 16 May 2010 as a political coalition, and became a unified political party on 21 April 2013. The URS advocated decentralization and was pro-business.
The Belgrade–Pristina negotiations are a series of European Union-facilitated talks between the governments of Serbia and Kosovo. Serbia claims Kosovo as its southern province under United Nations administration, and rejects its independence. Kosovo considers Serbia as a neighbouring state. The negotiations began in March 2011, three years after Kosovo declared independence. They are the first negotiations between the two entities since Kosovo declared independence in February 2008.
The First Agreement of Principles Governing the Normalisation of Relations, informally known as the Brussels Agreement, is an agreement to normalize relations between the governments of Serbia and Kosovo. The agreement, negotiated and concluded in Brussels under the auspices of the European Union, was signed on 19 April 2013. Negotiations were led by Serbian Prime Minister Ivica Dačić and Kosovo Prime Minister Hashim Thaçi, mediated by EU High Representative Catherine Ashton. The government of Serbia does not recognize Kosovo as a sovereign state, but began normalising relations with the government of Kosovo as a result of the agreement. In Belgrade, the agreement was criticized by protestors as a convalidation of Kosovo independence.
Elektromreža Srbije is a Serbian national transmission system operator company with the headquarters in Belgrade, Serbia.
Srđan Majstorović (Serbian: Срђан Мајсторовић; was born in Pula, SFR Yugoslavia, He is a Serbian political scientist who is an expert in the European integration of Serbia and the Western Balkans. He is the current chairman of the governing board of the European Policy Centre and is a member of the Balkans in Europe Policy Advisory Group.
Since 2015, the relationship between Serbia and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has been regulated in the context of an Individual Partnership Action Plan (IPAP).
The Labour Party of Serbia was a social democratic political party in Serbia. It was established in 2002 as the political wing of Serbia's Association of Free and Independent Trade Unions, and for the early part of its existence it was a constituent member of the Democratic Opposition of Serbia. The party largely became inactive after a poor showing in the 2003 Serbian parliamentary election.
In the run-up to the 2023 Serbian parliamentary election, various organisations carried out opinion polling to gauge voting intentions in Serbia. The results of such polls are displayed in this list. The date range for these opinion polls is from the previous election, held on 3 April 2022, to the 2023 election, which was held on 17 December 2023.