This article discusses aircraft carrier operations during World War II.
Naval historians such as Evan Mawdsley, Richard Overy, and Craig Symonds concluded that World War II's decisive victories on land could not have been won without decisive victories at sea. [1] Naval battles to keep shipping lanes open for combatants' movement of troops, guns, ammunition, tanks, warships, aircraft, raw materials, and food largely determined the outcome of land battles. Without the Allied victory in keeping shipping lanes open during the Battle of the Atlantic, Britain could not have fed her people or withstood Axis offensives in Europe and North Africa. [2] Without Britain's survival and without Allied shipments of food and industrial equipment to the Soviet Union, [lower-alpha 1] her military and economic power would likely not have rebounded in time for Russian soldiers to prevail at Stalingrad and Kursk. [3] [4] [5]
Without victories at sea in the Pacific theater, the Allies could not have mounted amphibious assaults on or maintained land forces on Guadalcanal, New Guinea, Saipan, The Philippines, Iwo Jima, or Okinawa. Allied operations in the Atlantic and Pacific theaters were interconnected because they frequently competed for scarce naval resources for everything from aircraft carriers to transports and landing craft. [6] Effective transport of troops and military supplies between the two war theaters required naval protection for shipping routes around the Cape of Good Hope, through the Suez canal, and through the Panama Canal. In both theaters, maritime dominance enabled combatants to use the sea for their own purposes and deprive its use by adversaries. As naval historian Admiral Herbert Richmond stated, "Sea power did not win the war itself: it enabled the war to be won." [7]
Aircraft carriers played a major role in winning decisive naval battles, [8] supporting key amphibious landings, and keeping critical merchant shipping lanes open for transporting military personnel and their equipment to land battle zones.
It became apparent early in the war that control of the air was prerequisite for successful surface action both on land and at sea. [lower-alpha 2] [9] For much of the war, Britain and America fought mainly on the seas, [10] [ clarification needed ] where successful Allied naval operations permitted effective support and reinforcement of troops in North Africa, the Soviet Union, western Europe and the Pacific. These operations also crippled similar efforts by Italy and Japan to sustain the empires they built by conquest. By 1942, aircraft carriers with the striking power provided by hundreds of warplanes delivering bombs and torpedoes to targets hundreds of miles away [11] supplanted battleships with big guns as the principal warships around which navies assembled task forces for major campaigns. [12]
Only the United States, United Kingdom, and Japan made significant use of aircraft carriers during the war. [lower-alpha 3] The following table shows the number of each type of carrier the principal combatants operated that had at least one flight deck, was capable of both launching and recovering aircraft at sea, and that was operational sometime between July 1937 and August 1945. The counts include carriers in service before the war began as well as those commissioned during the war.
Country | Fleet | Light | Escort | MAC | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
USA | 24 | 9 | 78 [lower-alpha 4] | 0 | 111 |
Britain | 12 | 8 | 44 [lower-alpha 5] | 19 | 83 |
Japan | 13 [lower-alpha 6] [lower-alpha 7] [lower-alpha 8] | 7 | 5 | 0 | 25 |
France | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 [lower-alpha 9] |
Total | 50 | 24 | 127 | 19 | 220 |
Total sunk | 19 | 7 | 15 | 0 | 41 |
Sunk percentage | 38% | 29% | 12% | 0% | 19% |
World War II fleet carriers typically displaced 20,000 to 35,000 tons and could sail at 30 to 35 knots. Japanese and American fleet carriers were typically capable of carrying 50 to 90 aircraft into combat. British carriers were designed with armored decks, a measure that provided significantly greater protection against bombs and kamikazes. The additional weight of the armor, however, reduced their typical carrying capability to 35 to 55 aircraft. Thus their additional defensive measures limited their offensive striking power until Britain introduced a new carrier class late in the war.
Light aircraft carriers were fast enough to keep up with the fleet carriers but their smaller size typically reduced their aircraft load to between 30 and 50. The design of those commissioned immediately after the war began typically reflected the immediate need for fast carriers and took advantage either of having other ship hulls available for conversion to aircraft carriers or the available capacity of commercial shipyards to build them. While these carriers made contributions to the war efforts, their relatively small size made them operationally inefficient. The measure of naval power in the Pacific Theater was the number of fleet carriers a navy had. [14]
Escort carriers were smaller, slower, lightly armored, and carried 20 to 30 aircraft. They were not typically included with naval battle fleets, but before the war was over, escort carriers had performed every function that the larger carriers did.
Merchant aircraft carriers (MACs) transported grain and oil in the holds below the flight deck and carried 3 or 4 aircraft to protect themselves and other ships in convoys in which they traveled. None were used for offensive operations.
Land-based aircraft as well as carrier-launched aircraft fought at sea. In the Atlantic Theater, German and Italian aircraft attacked Allied convoys that were protected by fighter aircraft from Allied airfields as long as convoys were within fighter range. As carriers became available, Allied carrier-launched fighters provided protection in those ocean areas that could not be protected by land-based planes. In the Pacific Theater, Japan's successful expansion was typically achieved by progressively using land-based aircraft to support invasions of new areas that were within striking distance of airbases that they had established on previously conquered areas. For the Allies, land-based aircraft at local airfields contributed significantly to America's defense of Midway Island and Guadalcanal. [15] Naval fighters and bombers that operated from land-based airfields were typically delivered to battle zones by aircraft carriers. In both theaters, carrier-launched aircraft played significant roles in dominating the air, and construction of aircraft carriers received priority.
At the same time that America, Britain, and Japan began emphasizing aircraft carrier construction, they de-emphasized construction of battleships. Before the war, the number of battleships a country operated was universally regarded as the principal indicator of naval power. [16] The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor sank or damaged eight [lower-alpha 10] of America's eighteen [lower-alpha 11] battleships. The aircraft carriers were at sea and escaped destruction. Six of the eight were repaired and returned to service [lower-alpha 12] and eight new battleships were commissioned during the rest of the war. [lower-alpha 13] During the period September 1939 to August 1945, America commissioned ten new battleships while Japan commissioned only two and converted two existing ones to hybrid aircraft carriers. Starting the war with 15 battleships and battlecruisers, the UK commissioned five King George V class battleships but the need for smaller vessels precluded building any more Germany, Italy, and France together commissioned a total of six. All together, only 23 new battleships were added to combatants' fleets during the war years [lower-alpha 14] compared to 55 new fleet and light carriers.
During the entire war, battleship guns sank only a single fleet carrier and a single battleship. [lower-alpha 15] In comparison, carrier-launched aircraft damaged, sank, or took part in sinking 19 battleships. [lower-alpha 16] Although Japan was first to recognize and exploit the greater effective striking power of aircraft carriers over battleships, she was slow to abandon employment of the latter. She commissioned battleships in 1941 and 1942 that were the largest and most heavily armed ever built. [lower-alpha 17] After the losses at the Battle of Midway, however, Japan changed naval tactics and began leaving battleships out of major naval engagements. [17] America began primary reliance upon its aircraft carriers for offensive operations early in the Pacific war out of necessity after the destruction of its Pacific battleship fleet during the Japanese raid on Pearl Harbor.
This section possibly contains original research .(January 2022) |
Aircraft carriers were used for a wide variety of combat and combat support functions during the war. These included:
The combatants differed in the functions they emphasized for carrier use, in part as a result of the challenges presented by their principal theater of operations. The table below indicates the percentage of carriers each combatant used for each function. For example, the US Navy operated a total of 33 fleet and light carriers during the war. Seventy-three per cent of these carriers participated in naval battles at one time or another. Eighty-five per cent were involved in support of invasions, etc. Escort carriers, although initially envisioned by many to perform only in support roles, ultimately performed all of the functions that the fleet and light carriers did.
Carriers | Naval Battles | Invasions | Raids | Anti-Ship. | Anti-Raid. | Anti-Sub. | Convoy Escort | Trans. | Training | Repat. | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CV & CVL | ||||||||||||
USN [20] | 33 | 73% | 85% | 82% | 9% | 0% | 3% | 15% | 15% | 3% | 45% | |
RN [21] | 20 | 20% | 45% | 55% | 45% | 35% | 30% | 50% | 45% | 15% | 20% | |
IJN [22] | 20 | 75% | 50% | 30% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5% | 35% | 10% | 10% | |
CVE | ||||||||||||
USN | 78 | 23% | 53% | 10% | 6% | 0% | 24% | 23% | 82% | 34% | 49% | |
RN | 44 | 0% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 30% | 61% | 82% | 18% | 23% | |
IJN | 5 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 80% | 100% | 60% | 0% |
Historian Craig Symonds lists three key factors enabling the Allies to win the war: British "grit", Russian manpower, and American industrial strength. [23] Specifically, the British Empire and Dominions continued for a year after the fall of France, stubbornly and successfully resisting the Axis. Thirty-five million Soviet Union soldiers fought during the war, as many as the United States, Germany, and Japan combined. The Soviet Union lost an estimated ten million soldiers to combat deaths, many more than any other combatant. America produced more artillery pieces, tanks, ships, and aircraft than all Axis countries combined, [24] [lower-alpha 19] including over 70% of the aircraft carriers commissioned during the war.
Carrier Type: | Fleet | Light | Escort | MAC | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
USA | 19 | 9 | 115 | 0 | 143 |
UK | 6 | 7 | 6 | 19 | 38 |
Japan | 9 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 19 |
Total | 34 | 21 | 126 | 19 | 200 |
Historian Richard Overy points out that statistics demonstrating material superiority are not by themselves sufficient for explaining why the Allies won the war. [26] Less easily quantifiable factors also played a significant part. The political will to fight and willingness of individual combatants to sacrifice was present within both the Allies and Axis. However, the timing of mobilizing manufacturing, technological, and manpower responses was also very important. America and Russia mobilized men and industrial capacity to rebound from significant military setbacks more quickly than anticipated by the attacking Axis powers. Important technological advances achieved by the Allies during the war outpaced those of the Axis powers in both offensive and defensive weapons systems. The Allies had greater and more strategically significant successes with code-breaking. The Allies placed greater emphasis than Axis powers on logistical support for men fighting on the front, enabling them to fight more efficiently and effectively. Geographical configurations, namely the English Channel, Atlantic Ocean, and Pacific Ocean, helped isolate British and American home bases from attack. [27] [28] Significant strategic offensive decisions by Axis leaders proved unsound, creating opportunities that the Allies exploited to great effect. [lower-alpha 20] Finally, luck played an important part in some decisive battles. [29] [30] Many of these factors played important parts in enabling the Allies to dominate the seas, a central reason, according to historian Evan Mawdsley, for their emerging victorious in the war. [28] Nonetheless, while statistics relating to industrial capacity to produce arms and planes and ships do not tell the whole story, they remain an important part of it.
Successful Allied initiatives at El Alamein, Stalingrad, French North Africa, and Guadalcanal in November 1942 marked strategic shifts for World War II. Aircraft carriers contributed to the success of these operations by protecting convoys of armaments and other supplies to Egypt and Russia, keeping Malta supplied and able to disrupt Axis supply operations to North Africa, providing air support for troops during the invasion of North Africa, and by helping prevent Japanese troops and supplies from reaching Guadalcanal. Beginning in 1943, the extensive mobilization of American production capability for war resulted in dramatic increases in the number of carriers available for even more strategic initiatives. Overall, aircraft carriers contributed greatly to making 1942 the pivotal, turning point of the war, 1944 the decisive year, and 1945 one for essentially finishing up, albeit at great cost. [31] [32]
In the Atlantic Theater, successful transportation of troops, aircraft, tanks, oil, and food from or routed through North America or up the West African coast to Britain, Russia, North Africa, and continental Europe was essential for ultimate Allied victory. Allied aircraft carriers screened by corvettes, destroyers and destroyer escorts proved more successful and cost-effective than battleships or cruisers for protecting convoys from attacks by Axis submarines, raiders, and land-based aircraft. By mid-1943, the Axis threat of cutting essential Allied supply lines had passed. By this time, however, six British carriers had been sunk. [lower-alpha 21]
In the Pacific Theater, a force of six Japanese fleet carriers with their combined aircraft striking power, the Kidō Butai , acted as a unit and roamed virtually at will for the first six months of the war. It made destructive raids against enemy positions from Hawaii in the east to India in the west and effectively supported Japanese invasions of the American Philippines, British Malaya and Burma, and the Dutch East Indies. Between May and October 1942, however, Japan and America fought four major battles between fleets centered around their aircraft carriers. During these battles, opposing warships never came within sight of each other nor fired their guns at other warships. Aircraft alone did the attacking. The first of these battles thwarted the Japanese attempt in the Coral Sea to isolate Australia. The second halted the expansion of Japanese control eastward in the Pacific toward Midway Island. The next two helped sustain the American presence on Guadalcanal. These four engagements [lower-alpha 22] were costly for both sides. At the time Pearl Harbor was attacked, Japan had a total of nine fleet and light carriers in the Pacific Theater. America had four in the Pacific with another two far away in the Atlantic. At the end of October 1942, after battle attrition from sinkings and damages, Japan had only three such carriers operational in the Pacific Theater and America, for a two-week period, had none. Though costly, the battles were strategically advantageous for the Americans, contributing significantly to the shift of strategic initiative in the Pacific Theater from Japan to America.
America was better able make good on their losses from these battles. From October 1942 until the end of the Pacific war, America commissioned 26 new fleet and light carriers. Japan commissioned eight. Over the entire war, the Allies commissioned a total of 181 carriers of all types compared to Japan's total of 19.
At September 1939 | Comm. 1939-41 | Sunk 1939-41 | At December 1941 [lower-alpha 23] | Comm. 1942-45 | Sunk 1942-45 | Retired 1942-45 | At September 1945 | Total Comm. | Total Sunk | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USN | 6 [lower-alpha 24] | +3 | -0 | 9 | +102 | -12 | -0 | 99 | +105 | -12 |
RN | 7 | +6 | -3 | 10 | +70 | -5 | -7 [lower-alpha 25] | 68 | +76 | -8 |
Allies | 13 [lower-alpha 26] | +9 | -3 | 19 | +172 | -17 | -7 | 167 | +181 | -20 |
IJN | 6 | +3 | -0 | 9 [lower-alpha 27] | +16 | -21 | -0 | 4 [lower-alpha 28] | +19 | -21 |
Total | 19 | +12 | -3 | 28 | +188 | -38 | -7 | 171 | +200 | -41 |
The number of aircraft carriers operational for combat missions at any time was typically less than the total number of carriers afloat. For example, at the end of October 1942 following the Battle of the Santa Cruz Islands, only seven (47%) of the fifteen fleet and light carriers the combatants had afloat worldwide were operational. Japan had six such carriers afloat but only three were operational. [lower-alpha 29] America had three afloat, but one was in the Atlantic and the other two were damaged, leaving no operational carriers in the Pacific. [lower-alpha 30] Britain had six afloat, all in the Atlantic, but only three were operational. [lower-alpha 31] In the Pacific for a short period, there were no Allied carriers that could oppose Japan's three operational carriers.
UK | USA [lower-alpha 32] | Japan [lower-alpha 32] | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total Afloat, 31 August 1939 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 18 |
Commissioned | +4 | +2 | +6 | +12 |
Sunk | -5 | -4 | -6 | -15 |
Total afloat, as of 31 October 1942 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
Non-operational, 31 October 1942 | -3 | -2 | -3 | -8 |
Operational worldwide, as of 31 October 1942 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
Operational Atlantic, 31 October 1942 | -3 | -1 | 0 | -4 |
Operational Pacific, 31 October 1942 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
As the war progressed, the relative number of operational carriers available for combat by each side depended upon 1)construction rates for new carriers, 2)losses due to sinkings, 3)how quickly carriers damaged in combat could be brought back into service, and 4)the time required for routine overhauls, refits for carriers to perform specific functions, and upgrades for older carriers. Short-term naval capabilities, plans, and outcomes were determined by the number of carriers that were operational during any given month. The impact of the relative number of operational, combat-ready carriers available was particularly felt during 1942, when the strategic initiative in the Pacific Theater passed from Japan to America.
Prior to 1936, international naval arms limitation treaties negotiated in Washington in 1922 and London in 1930 had required that the total number of Japanese capital ships (battleships, battle cruisers, aircraft carriers) be less than the number operated by either America or Britain. The agreed upon ratio was 5:5:3 for Britain, America, and Japan respectively. Dissatisfied with these limitations, Japan discontinued participation in naval treaty negotiations in 1936 and invested in a construction program that within five years doubled the number of her fleet and light carriers. At the time of Japan's raid on Pearl Harbor and her invasion of British Malaya, Japan had almost as many such carriers afloat as Britain and America combined. Moreover, since the western Allies deployed half of their carriers in the Atlantic and Mediterranean) to oppose Germany and Italy, Japan had almost twice the Allies' number of carriers in the Pacific Theater (including the Indian Ocean) when she initiated hostilities.
Beginning in December 1942, the effects of America's industrial strength became evident as she began commissioning either a fleet carrier or a light carrier almost every month for the next two years. From November 1942, after the losses that year from four carrier battles, until the end of the war, America commissioned 26 new such carriers compared to 8 for Japan and 9 for Britain.
Period | March 1918 to August 1939 | September 1939 to November 1941 | December 1941 to October 1942 | November 1942 September 1945 | March 1918 to September 1945 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fleet carriers | |||||
USA | 5 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 24 |
UK | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 |
Japan | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 13 |
Total | 15 | 8 | 2 | 24 | 49 |
Light carriers | |||||
USA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
UK | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
Japan | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 24 |
Fleet and light ("Fast") carriers | |||||
USA | 5 | 2 | 0 | 26 | 33 |
UK | 7 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 20 |
Japan | 6 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 20 |
Total | 18 | 10 | 2 | 43 | 73 |
Escort carriers | |||||
USA | 1 | 1 | 9 | 67 | 78 |
Britain | 0 | 2 | 5 | 37 | 44 |
Japan | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
Total | 1 | 4 | 15 | 107 | 127 |
Merchant aircraft carriers | |||||
UK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 19 |
All carriers | |||||
USA | 6 | 3 | 9 | 93 | 111 |
UK | 7 | 6 | 5 | 65 | 83 |
Japan | 6 | 5 | 3 | 11 | 25 |
Total | 19 | 14 | 17 | 169 | 219 |
The time from building to entering operational service included sea trials to test the ship's systems and to train personnel. Only then did carriers move to intended war zones. Construction of HMS Victorious began in 1937 but she did not become combat operational until mid-1941 when rushed into the hunt for the German battleship Bismarck with only a quarter of her aircraft onboard . [34] The USS Essex began in April 1941 and she was operational in mid-1943, in a raid on Rabaul eight months after commissioning. [35]
The elapsed time between commissioning and combat action could also be short or long for escort carriers. Santee (CVE), a converted oil tanker rushed into service, still had workmen aboard during her shakedown cruise. Within seven weeks of commissioning, her aircraft were bombing airfields, spotting for warship's guns, patrolling for enemy cruisers and submarines, and refueling other ships in support of the invasion of North Africa. [36] [37] On the other hand, HMS Empress (D42) (an escort carrier) built in the US, experienced one of the longest periods between commissioning and combat action. She was built at Seattle on the US West Coast and then transferred to a Royal Canadian Dockyard Vancounver where she was commissioned in August 1943. She remained there until February 1944 undergoing modifications to meet Britain's requirements for deployment to defend convoys. She then sailed via the Panama Canal to the Atlantic and participated in exercises with other escort carriers in the Caribbean before heading north to Norfolk. Aircraft were embarked for transport to Britain, where Empress arrived in April. There, through November, she underwent repairs for defects and modifications considered necessary based upon experience with other operational escort carriers. Further preparations took place in December. In January 1945, still without aircrew aboard, she sailed for the Indian Ocean, where she took on an air squadron and participated in reconnaissance flights in February about 18 months after initial commissioning. [38]
Escort carriers constructed in American shipyards and transferred to Britain spent more time being delivered because of the distance from America's west coast and Britain. In addition, modifications made in some cases because of concerns over onboard safety increased the elapsed time between CVE's commissioning and becoming operational. Britain made major changes to many American-made escort carriers due to concerns over fuel handling facilities after the unexplained explosion and sinking of HMS Dasher (D37) in March 1943. [39] In addition, some elapsed time was due to modifications to make some carriers suitable for specific combat functions. As lessons were learned during combat, carriers were refitted to change armament or otherwise reconfigure systems. Such modifications removed carriers from combat availability during these modifications.
This section possibly contains original research .(February 2022) |
Damage to carriers due to weapons systems, collisions, weather, and other causes also reduced the number of carriers available for operations at any given time. Not every incident resulted in significant loss of combat effectiveness or retirement from combat. However, there were at least 229 incidents for which damage was sustained by carriers from enemy weapon systems or causes such as extreme weather (storms, typhoons), collisions, aircraft landing accidents, etc. that resulted in lost operational time. Forty-one of these damage incidents resulted in a carrier sinking. Fourteen incidents of damage involved more than one cause such as a carrier being damaged by both bombs and aerial torpedoes during a single attack. Taking such multiple causes for the 229 "damage incidents" into account, the number of "damage involvements" due to the various causes totaled 243. Consequently, the total for percentages of damage involvements may equal more than 100% of damage incidents. The percentages shown in the tables below indicate the frequency that a given cause was involved in the 229 incidents of damage/sinkings.
Enemy bombs were the leading cause of lost operational time for aircraft carriers during the war. They were involved in 25% of the 229 damage incidents. In addition, bombs were involved in sinking 44% of carriers sunk. The second largest cause for carriers' lost operational time was attacks by Japan's Special Attack Units, i.e., suicide planes that became known as kamikazes. Although introduced only in the last year of the war, kamikazes were involved in 19% of the total damage incidents. They were less effective for inflicting sufficient damage to sink carriers, however, and were involved in only 7% of carrier sinkings. Torpedoes launched by submarines and by aircraft were both involved in sinking more carriers than kamikazes, even during the final year of the war after kamikazes had been introduced. Torpedoes were also more efficient in sinking carriers as indicated by the higher percentage of damage involvements that resulted in sinking (59% when submarine-launched and 64% when aircraft-launched). The percentage of damage involvements resulting in sinkings also indicates that surface weapons were more efficient in sinking carriers than aerial-delivered weapons even though aerial weapons resulted in more carriers sunk. Causes other than weapon systems were responsible for 39% of lost time incidents, but accounted for only one carrier sank, an escort carrier.
Causes For Damage | Carrier Lost-Time Involvements | Carriers Sunk | Per cent of Lost-Time Incidents | Per cent Of Carriers Sunk | Percentage of Sinkings To Incidents |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bombs | 58 | 18 | 25% | 44% | 31% |
Kamikazes | 44 | 3 | 19% | 7% | 7% |
Storms & Typhoons | 30 | 13% | 0% | ||
Submarine Torpedoes | 29 | 17 | 13% | 41% | 59% |
Collisions | 29 | 13% | 0% | ||
Aircraft Accidents | 15 | 7% | 0% | ||
Aerial Torpedoes | 14 | 9 | 6% | 22% | 64% |
Warship Gunfire | 6 | 3 | 3% | 7% | 50% |
Mines | 3 | 1% | 0% | ||
All Other Causes | 15 | 1 | 7% | 2% | 7% |
Total Lost-Time Involvements | 243 | 51 | 106% | 124% | 21% |
Recap: | |||||
Aerial Weapons | 116 | 30 | 51% | 73% | 26% |
Surface Weapons | 38 | 20 | 17% | 49% | 53% |
Other Causes | 89 | 1 | 39% | 2% | 1% |
Total Lost-Time Involvements | 243 | 51 | 106% | 124% | 21% |
Incidents Involving Multiple Causes | -14 | -10 | -6% | -24% | |
Total Lost-Time Incidents | 229 | 41 | 100% | 100% | 18% |
In the early years of the war, the combatants risked and lost a high percentage of their carriers. By October 1942, after the carrier battles for the year, America, Britain, and Japan had, in both theaters, lost a combined total of 15 fleet and light carriers. With new commissionings, they then had 15 such carriers afloat compared with the 18 they had in August 1939 at the opening of the European war and 24 in December 1941 when Pearl Harbor was attacked. The following table shows the number of such carriers sunk each year of the war. The total number of escort carriers (CVE) sunk during the war is also shown.
Year | America | Britain | Japan | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
1939 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
1940 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
1941 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
1942 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 12 |
1943 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1944 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
1945 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
1939–1945 CV & CVL | 5 | 5 | 16 | 26 |
1939–1945 CVE | 7 | 3 | 5 | 15 |
1939–1945 CV, CVL, & CVE | 12 | 8 | 21 | 41 |
Taking into account all the factors that kept aircraft carriers out of combat after commissioning, carriers were typically operational 80% to 90% of the time. They were typically out of service 5% to 15% for combat-related damage repair and 5% to 10% for delivery and refitting to otherwise improve performance. Royal Navy escort carriers were typically out of service for refitting more than other carriers.
Fleet & Light Carriers | In Service | Damage Repair | Refitting | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
RN Fleet & Light Carriers | 79% | 10% | 11% | 100% |
USN Fleet & Light Carriers | 82% | 12% | 6% | 100% |
IJN Fleet & Light Carriers | 82% | 15% | 4% | 100% |
Escort Carriers | ||||
RN Escort Carriers | 72% | 5% | 23% | 100% |
USN Escort Carriers | 90% | 5% | 5% | 100% |
IJN Escort Carriers | 82% | 12% | 6% | 100% |
The number of operational carriers available to the combatants at any point in time affected the capability, plans, and outcomes of military operations in both the Atlantic and Pacific theaters throughout the war. Taking into consideration the time for construction, shakedown trials, delivery, refitting, combat damage, and sinkings, the table below shows the number of fleet and light carriers that were operational for each combatant in each combat theater at the end of each month. The Pacific Theater includes the Indian Ocean and the Atlantic Theater includes the Mediterranean Sea.
The table capsulizes the course of the war for aircraft carrier operations. It reflects how Japan more than doubled the number of her carriers between leaving the Washington/London naval treaties in 1936 and the time she attacked Pearl Harbor in December 1941. It also reflects the attrition for carriers during the formative year of 1942. It reflects the industrial capacity of the United States, illustrating how she could make good her losses of 1942 while Japan could not. Finally, it reflects the shift of British carriers to the Pacific after the Allies prevailed in battles for Atlantic waters. Note also that, after the two carrier battles off Guadalcanal in 1942, the percentage of aircraft carriers afloat that were in fact available for combat operations was typically less than 70%. During the Guadalcanal campaign in 1942, that percentage fell below 50%. From then until mid-1944, Japan did not engage her carriers in a major operation. When at last she did, the rest of her carriers were sunk or damaged.
Country: | USA | UK | Japan | USA | UK | Total | Total | To Total |
Theater: | Pacific | Pacific | Pacific | Atlantic | Atlantic | Pac&Atl | Pac&Atl | Oper. |
Status: | Oper. | Oper. | Oper. | Oper. | Oper. | Oper. | Afloat | Per cent |
Aug 1939 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 18 | 18 | 100% |
Dec 1939 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 17 | 100% |
June 1940 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 18 | 89% |
Dec 1940 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 20 | 20 | 100% |
June 1941 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 18 | 21 | 86% |
Dec 1941 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 25 | 76% |
May 1942 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 23 | 91% |
June 1942 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 18 | 89% |
July 1942 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 16 | 19 | 84% |
Aug 1942 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 17 | 71% |
Sept 1942 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 16 | 69% |
Oct 1942 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 15 | 47% |
Nov 1942 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 16 | 56% |
Dec 1942 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 17 | 71% |
June 1943 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16 | 26 | 62% |
Dec 1943 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 34 | 56% |
June 1944 | 17 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 29 | 38 | 76% |
Dec 1944 | 16 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 40 | 63% |
June 1945 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 27 | 47 | 57% |
Aug 1945 | 23 | 9 | 0 [lower-alpha 33] | 0 | 3 | 35 | 47 | 74% |
.
The US defined the Atlantic theater as including the North Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Arctic Oceans along with the Mediterranean and Caribbean Seas and the Gulf of Mexico.
The UK defined the Mediterranean as a separate theatre together with North Africa and Middle East.
For convoy defence against enemy submarines, escort carriers came into service in numbers in 1942.
The US Pacific theater included the Pacific and Indian oceans along with adjacent sea areas such as the South China Sea, East China Sea, and the Sea of Japan.
Over 700 different aircraft models were used during World War II. [50] At least 135 of these models were developed for naval use, [51] including about 50 fighters [52] and 38 bombers. [53]
Only about 25 carrier-launched aircraft models were used extensively for combat operations. Of these, nine were introduced during the war years after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor brought United States into the war, four by the United States Navy (USN) and three by the Royal Navy (RN) and two by the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN).Lists of aircraft carriers by carrier type for each country may be found at Lists of aircraft carriers operational during World War II.
Naval historians such as Evan Mawdsley, Richard Overy, and Craig Symonds concluded that World War II's decisive victories on land could not have been won without decisive victories at sea. [54] [55] [56] Naval battles to keep shipping lanes open for combatant's movement of troops, guns, ammunition, tanks, warships, aircraft, raw materials, and food largely determined the outcome of land battles. Without the Allied victory in keeping shipping lanes open during the Battle of the Atlantic, Britain could not have fed her people or withstood Axis offensives in Europe and North Africa. [57] Without Britain's survival and without Allied shipments of food and industrial equipment to the Soviet Union, [lower-alpha 1] her military and economic power would likely not have rebounded in time for Russian soldiers to prevail at Stalingrad and Kursk. [58] [59] [60] [61] [62]
Without victories at sea in the Pacific theater, the Allies could not have mounted amphibious assaults on or maintained land forces on Guadalcanal, New Guinea, Saipan, The Philippines, Iwo Jima, or Okinawa. Allied operations in the Atlantic and Pacific war theaters were interconnected because they frequently competed for scarce naval resources for everything from aircraft carriers to transports and landing craft. [63] Effective transport of troops and military supplies between the two war theaters required naval protection for shipping routes around the Cape of Good Hope, through the Suez canal, and through the Panama Canal. In both theaters, maritime dominance enabled combatants to use the sea for their own purposes and deprive its use by adversaries. As naval historian Admiral Herbert Richmond stated, "Sea power did not win the war itself: it enabled the war to be won". [64]
Aircraft carriers played a major role in winning decisive naval battles, [65] supporting key amphibious landings, and keeping critical merchant shipping lanes open for transporting military personnel and their equipment to land battle zones. This article is part of a series that covers World War II from the vantage point of aircraft carrier operations and is focused upon names and dates for operations involving aircraft carriers.This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic.(January 2022) |
Naval historians such as Evan Mawdsley, Richard Overy, and Craig Symonds concluded that World War II's decisive victories on land could not have been won without decisive victories at sea. [66] [67] [68] Naval battles to keep shipping lanes open for combatant's movement of troops, guns, ammunition, tanks, warships, aircraft, raw materials, and food largely determined the outcome of land battles. Without the Allied victory in keeping shipping lanes open during the Battle of the Atlantic, Britain could not have fed her people or withstood Axis offensives in Europe and North Africa. [69] Without Britain's survival and without Allied shipments of materiel, food and industrial equipment to the Soviet Union, [lower-alpha 1] her military and economic power would likely not have rebounded in time for the Red Army to prevail at Stalingrad and Kursk. [70] [71] [72] [73] [74]
Without victories at sea in the Pacific theater, the Allies could not have mounted amphibious assaults on or maintained land forces on Guadalcanal, New Guinea, Saipan, The Philippines, Iwo Jima, or Okinawa. Allied operations in the Atlantic and Pacific war theaters were interconnected because they frequently competed for scarce naval resources for everything from aircraft carriers to transports and landing craft. [75] Effective transport of troops and military supplies between the two war theaters required naval protection for shipping routes around the Cape of Good Hope, through the Suez canal, and through the Panama Canal. In both theaters, maritime dominance enabled combatants to use the sea for their own purposes and deprive its use by adversaries. As naval historian Admiral Herbert Richmond stated, "Sea power did not win the war itself: it enabled the war to be won". [76]
Aircraft carriers played a major role in winning decisive naval battles, [77] supporting key amphibious landings, and keeping critical merchant shipping lanes open for transporting military personnel and their equipment to land battle zones.{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)A cruiser is a type of warship. Modern cruisers are generally the largest ships in a fleet after aircraft carriers and amphibious assault ships, and can usually perform several operational roles from search-and-destroy to ocean escort to sea denial.
The escort carrier or escort aircraft carrier, also called a "jeep carrier" or "baby flattop" in the United States Navy (USN) or "Woolworth Carrier" by the Royal Navy, was a small and slower type of aircraft carrier used by the Royal Navy, the Royal Canadian Navy, the United States Navy, the Imperial Japanese Navy and Imperial Japanese Army Air Force in World War II. They were typically half the length and a third the displacement of larger fleet carriers, more-lightly armed and armored, and carried fewer planes. Escort carriers were most often built upon a commercial ship hull, so they were cheaper and could be built quickly. This was their principal advantage as they could be completed in greater numbers as a stop-gap when fleet carriers were scarce. However, the lack of protection made escort carriers particularly vulnerable, and several were sunk with great loss of life. The light carrier was a similar concept to the escort carrier in most respects, but was fast enough to operate alongside fleet carriers.
The Battle of Leyte Gulf was the largest naval battle of World War II and by some criteria the largest naval battle in history, with over 200,000 naval personnel involved.
The Yorktown class was a class of three aircraft carriers built for the United States Navy and completed shortly before World War II, the Yorktown (CV-5), Enterprise (CV-6), and Hornet (CV-8). They immediately followed Ranger, the first U.S. aircraft carrier built as such, and benefited in design from experience with Ranger and the earlier Lexington class, which were conversions into carriers of two battlecruisers that were to be scrapped to comply with the Washington Naval Treaty, an arms limitation accord.
The Battle of the Santa Cruz Islands, fought during 25–27 October 1942, sometimes referred to as the Battle of Santa Cruz or Third Battle of Solomon Sea, in Japan as the Battle of the South Pacific, was the fourth aircraft carrier battle of the Pacific campaign of World War II. It was also the fourth major naval engagement fought between the United States Navy and the Imperial Japanese Navy during the lengthy and strategically important Guadalcanal campaign. As in the battles of the Coral Sea, Midway, and the Eastern Solomons, the ships of the two adversaries were rarely in sight or gun range of each other. Instead, almost all attacks by both sides were mounted by carrier- or land-based aircraft.
Frank Jack Fletcher was an admiral in the United States Navy during World War II. Fletcher commanded five different task forces through the war; he was the operational task force commander at the pivotal battles of the Coral Sea and Midway, which collectively resulted in the sinking of five Japanese aircraft carriers.
During World War II, at the beginning of the Pacific War in December 1941, the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) was the third most powerful navy in the world, and the naval air service was one of the most potent air forces in the world. During the first six months of the war, the IJN enjoyed spectacular success inflicting heavy defeats on Allied forces, being undefeated in every battle. The attack on Pearl Harbor crippled the battleships of the US Pacific Fleet, while Allied navies were devastated during Japan's conquest of Southeast Asia. Japanese Navy aircraft operating from land bases were also responsible for the sinkings of HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse which was the first time that capital ships were sunk by aerial attack while underway. In April 1942, the Indian Ocean raid drove the Royal Navy from South East Asia. After these successes, the Japanese now concentrated on the elimination and neutralization of strategic points from where the Allies could launch counteroffensives against Japan's conquests. However, at Coral Sea the Japanese were forced to abandon their attempts to isolate Australia while the defeat at Midway saw them forced on the defensive. The campaign in the Solomon Islands, in which the Japanese lost the war of attrition, was the most decisive; they had failed to commit enough forces in sufficient time.
Operation Cockpit was an Allied attack against the Japanese-held island of Sabang on 19 April 1944. It was conducted by aircraft flying from British and American aircraft carriers and targeted Japanese shipping and airfields. A small number of Japanese ships and aircraft were destroyed, and one American aircraft was lost. While the attack was successful tactically, it failed to divert Japanese forces from other areas as had been hoped.
Operation Transom was an attack by Allied forces against the Japanese-occupied city of Surabaya on the Indonesian island of Java during World War II. Conducted by the British-led Eastern Fleet, the operation took place on 17 May 1944 and involved American and British carrier-based aircraft bombing the city's docks and an oil refinery. An American torpedo bomber was shot down, and two British torpedo bombers were lost in accidents.
P.T.O. IV, released as Teitoku no Ketsudan IV (提督の決断IV) in Japan, is a World War II-themed strategy for the PlayStation 2 and PC produced by Koei. It focuses on naval combat in the maritime theaters of World War II, encompassing the Pacific Ocean, Mediterranean Sea, Atlantic Ocean, and Indian Ocean, with the option of playing as one of four major maritime powers of the time: Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, or the United States. P.T.O. IV is the latest game in Koei's P.T.O. series.
World War II saw the end of the battleship as the dominant force in the world's navies. At the outbreak of the war, large fleets of battleships—many inherited from the dreadnought era decades before—were one of the decisive forces in naval thinking. By the end of the war, battleship construction was all but halted, and almost every remaining battleship was retired or scrapped within a few years of its end.
The attacks on Kure and the Inland Sea by United States and British naval aircraft in late July 1945 sank most of the surviving large warships of the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN). The United States Third Fleet's attacks on Kure Naval Arsenal and nearby ports on 24, 25, and 28 July sank an aircraft carrier, three battleships, five cruisers, and several smaller warships. During the same period the British Pacific Fleet attacked other targets in the Inland Sea region and sank two escort ships and several smaller vessels as well as damaging an escort carrier.
The Eastern Fleet, later called the East Indies Fleet, was a fleet of the Royal Navy which existed between 1941 and 1952.
The United States Navy grew rapidly during its involvement in World War II from 1941–45, and played a central role in the Pacific War against Imperial Japan. It also assisted the British Royal Navy in the naval war against Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. The U.S. Navy grew slowly in the years prior to World War II, due in part to international limitations on naval construction in the 1920s. Battleship production restarted in 1937, commencing with the USS North Carolina. The US Navy was able to add to its fleets during the early years of the war while the US was still neutral, increasing production of vessels both large and small, deploying a navy of nearly 350 major combatant ships by December 1941 and having an equal number under construction.
At the beginning of World War II, the Royal Navy was the strongest navy in the world, with the largest number of warships built and with naval bases across the globe. It had over 15 battleships and battlecruisers, 7 aircraft carriers, 66 cruisers, 164 destroyers and 66 submarines. With a massive merchant navy, about a third of the world total, it also dominated shipping. The Royal Navy fought in every theatre from the Atlantic, Mediterranean, freezing Northern routes to Russia and the Pacific ocean.
World War II was the first war where naval aviation took a major part in the hostilities. Aircraft carriers were used from the start of the war in Europe looking for German merchant raiders and escorting convoys. Offensive operations began with the Norwegian campaign where British carriers supported the fighting on land.
Naval historians such as Evan Mawdsley, Richard Overy, and Craig Symonds concluded that World War II's decisive victories on land could not have been won without decisive victories at sea. Naval battles to keep shipping lanes open for combatant's movement of troops, guns, ammunition, tanks, warships, aircraft, raw materials, and food largely determined the outcome of land battles. Without the Allied victory in keeping shipping lanes open during the Battle of the Atlantic, Britain could not have fed her people or withstood Axis offensives in Europe and North Africa. Without Britain's survival and without Allied shipments of food and industrial equipment to the Soviet Union, her military and economic power would likely not have rebounded in time for Russian soldiers to prevail at Stalingrad and Kursk.
Naval historians such as Evan Mawdsley, Richard Overy, and Craig Symonds concluded that World War II's decisive victories on land could not have been won without decisive victories at sea. Naval battles to keep shipping lanes open for combatant's movement of troops, guns, ammunition, tanks, warships, aircraft, raw materials, and food largely determined the outcome of land battles. Without the Allied victory in keeping shipping lanes open during the Battle of the Atlantic, Britain could not have fed her people or withstood Axis offensives in Europe and North Africa. Without Britain's survival and without Allied shipments of materiel, food and industrial equipment to the Soviet Union, her military and economic power would likely not have rebounded in time for the Red Army to prevail at Stalingrad and Kursk.