Fiume question

Last updated

Map of Free State of Fiume: former Corpus Separatum (brown), Free State of Fiume territory (brown and yellow) Free State of Fiume 1920-1924.png
Map of Free State of Fiume: former Corpus Separatum (brown), Free State of Fiume territory (brown and yellow)

In the aftermath of the First World War, the Fiume question was the dispute regarding the postwar fate of the city of Rijeka (Italian: Fiume) and its surroundings. An element of the Adriatic question, the dispute arose from competing claims by the Kingdom of Italy and the short-lived State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs carved out in the process of dissolution of Austria-Hungary. The latter claim was taken over by the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (later renamed Yugoslavia), itself formed through unification of the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs with the Kingdom of Serbia in late 1918. In its claim, Italy relied on provisions of the Treaty of London concluded in 1915 as well as on provisions of Armistice of Villa Giusti allowing victorious Allies of World War I to occupy unspecified Austro-Hungarian territories if necessary.

Contents

In case of possession of Rijeka, both sides in the dispute claimed their reliance on the right of self-determination championed by US President Woodrow Wilson in his Fourteen Points, but the two sides defined the extent of the city of Rijeka differently, resulting in majority of the affected population being either Italians or South Slavs (largely Croats and Slovenes). The difference in interpretation of the city boundaries was that Italians claimed the city was limited to the territory of the Corpus Separatum , established as a special administrative unit attached to the Hungarian crown within Austria-Hungary, while Yugoslav side claimed that the suburb of Sušak, located outside the Corpus Separatum boundaries, represented an unseparable part of the city. Two competing administrations were established in the city following departure of Hungarian authorities in late October 1918. In November, the city was placed under Allied occupation in which the Italian Army provided the bulk of the occupying force. The occupying force left after Gabriele D'Annunzio seized the city in September 1919 proclaiming its annexation for Italy.

The matter was not resolved by the 1919 Paris Peace Conference because the Wilson opposed Italian claims based on the Treaty of London, but Italian government would not accept a compromise due to its political instabilty. The Italo-Yugoslav border was first resolved by the 1920 Treaty of Rapallo. The agreement provided for establishment of the city-state of the Free State of Fiume—against D'Annunzio's objections. In response, he proclaimed an independent Italian Regency of Carnaro in Rijeka and declared war on Italy, only to be driven from the city in an armed intervention by the Regia Marina . Italian troops remained in Rijeka (and Sušak until 1923). The Free State of Fiume was abolished by the 1924 Treaty of Rome, and the city annexed to Italy. In the World War II, the Yugoslav Partisans took control of Rijeka in 1945. In agreement with the Allies of World War II, authorities of the Democratic Federal Yugoslavia provisionally administered Rijeka and its surrunding areas until 1947. Then the city was formally ceded to Yugoslavia under the Treaty of Paris between Italy and the Allied Powers.

Background

In 1915, the Kingdom of Italy entered World War I on the side of the Entente, following the signing of the Treaty of London, which promised Italy territorial gains at the expense of Austria-Hungary. The treaty was opposed by representatives of the South Slavs living in Austria-Hungary, who were organised as the Yugoslav Committee. [1] Following the 3 November 1918 Armistice of Villa Giusti, the Austro-Hungarian surrender, [2] Italian troops moved to occupy parts of the Eastern Adriatic shore promised to Italy under the Treaty of London, ahead of the Paris Peace Conference. [3] The State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs, carved from areas of Austria-Hungary populated by the South Slavs (encompassing the Slovene lands, Croatia-Slavonia, Dalmatia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina), authorised the Yugoslav Committee to represent it abroad, [4] and the short-lived state, shortly before it sought union with the Kingdom of Serbia to establish the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (later renamed Yugoslavia), laid a competing claim to the eastern Adriatic to counter the Italian demands. [5] This claim was supported by deployment of the Royal Serbian Army (subsequently reformed as the Royal Yugoslav Army) to the area. [6]

Hungarian rule

Territories promised to Italy by the 1915 Treaty of London, i.e. Trentino-Alto Adige, the Julian March and Dalmatia (tan), and the Sneznik Plateau area (green). Promised Borders of the Tready of London.png
Territories promised to Italy by the 1915 Treaty of London, i.e. Trentino-Alto Adige, the Julian March and Dalmatia (tan), and the Snežnik Plateau area (green).

Since at least 18th century, Croatia and Hungary, both realms of the Habsburg monarchy at the time, laid competing claims on the city of Rijeka (Italian: Fiume) – as a part of the national territory and an important Adriatic port. [7] In 1776, the city was attached to Hungarian crown by empress Maria Theresa as an separatum coronae adnexum corpus (lit.'separate body attached to the crown'). The Latin title was commonly shortened to just Corpus Separatum . [8] During the Hungarian Revolution of 1848, the city was annexed to Croatia by Ban Josip Jelačić. The move was reversed following the Austro-Hungarian Compromise of 1867 and the Croatian–Hungarian Settlement of 1868. The latter indicated that the city would be a separate body within Austria-Hungary, belonging to the Hungarian crown. The Croatian Sabor and the Parliament of Hungary were to determine the specific conditions of the city's status, but they failed to reach an agreement for two years. In 1870, the Hungarian Parliament enacted a regulation on temporary Hungarian control of Rijeka. [7] The regulation remained in effect until 1918. [9] The city outgrew the territory of the Corpus Separatum through industrialisation and its suburb of Sušak was situated in Croatian territory. The suburb was largely inhabited by workers employed by factories in the city centre. [10]

In the final phase of the World War I, in an effort to prevent dissolution of Austria-Hungary, emperor Charles I of Austria declared an intention to transform the monarchy into a federal state, indicating that Rijeka would be a part of the Croatia-Slavonia or a newly established South Slavic kingdom. [11] The Emperor's declaration echoed the 1917 May Declaration of the Yugoslav Club, [12] demanding unification of Habsburg lands inhabited by Croats, Slovenes, and Serbs into a democratic, free, and independent state organised as a Habsburg realm. [13] Just as the May Declaration was ignored by relevant political parties, [14] the imperial declaration was rejected by the Zagreb-based National Council of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs, the self-proclaimed central organ of the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs. [15] In mid-October, Andrea Ossoinack speaking in the Parliament of Hungary as the representative of the Corpus Separatum objected to the emperor's idea and stated that the city should be handed over to Italy. [11] Clashes erupted in the city between Italian and South Slavic communities, each side claiming the city on the basis of the right to self-determination. While the former pointed to an Italian majority in the city within the boundaries of the Corpus Separatum, the latter pointed out that the city, including the suburb of Sušak located outside the Corpus Separatum, had a South Slavic majority. [16] [17] [a]

On 23 October, pro-Croatian troops entered Rijeka. [24] Military authority in Rijeka and Sušak was assumed by Lieutenant Colonel Petar Teslić. He had under his command eight battalions of the 79th Infantry Regiment of the former Austro-Hungarian Common Army normally based in Otočac and National Guard volunteers, largely consisting of high school students. [25] On 29 October, the last Hungarian governor of the Corpus Separatum, Zoltán Jékelfalussy  [ hu ] left the city for Hungary on a special train, [26] on instruction of Hungarian prime minister Sándor Wekerle. He was followed by the bulk of the city's police force. [27] A large number of skilled workers, especially ethnic Hungarians, also left. [28] Before leaving, Jékelfalussy handed the authority over to a commission appointed by the National Council of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs. [27] The commission was led by Rikard Lenac. [29] On the other hand, leading ethnic Italians living in the city estabished the Italian National Council of Fiume. [30] The Italian National Council, led by Antonio Grossich, proclaimed annexation of the city to Italy on 30 October. [24] On 3 November, Grossich dispatched a delegation to Admiral Paolo Thaon di Revel in Venice to request aid. [26] Lenac requested Zagreb to send troops as well. [25]

Allied occupation

Border between Rijeka and Susak in 1929 Rijeka Susak granica 1929.jpg
Border between Rijeka and Sušak in 1929

On 2 November, a group of United States Navy ships sailed into the Port of Rijeka. The next day, they were followed by a French and a British force. [31] The British mission to Rijeka was led by Colonel Sydney Capel Peck. [32] On the same day, the Inter-Allied Command was established in Rijeka, [25] ostensibly to prevent further ethnic violence. [33] On 3 November, the day the armistice was signed, Italian armed forces gained control of much of nearby Istria peninsula to the West. [34] The Italian navy first sailed into the Port of Rijeka on 4 November. [25] The initial group consisted of battleship Emanuele Filiberto, destroyers Francesco Stocco, Vincenzo Giordano Orsini, and Giuseppe Sirtori. [35] On 5 November, French destroyers Touareg and Sakalave brought further reinforcements. [36]

A battalion, 700-strong, [37] of the First Yugoslav Volunteer Division led by Lieutenant Colonel Vojin Maksimović  [ sl ] arrived from Zagreb on 15 November. [25] Two days later, 16 thousand Italian troops arrived as well, led by General Enrico Asinari di San Marzano  [ it ]. [36] The battalion of the First Yugoslav Volunteer Division withdrew from the city and Teslić's troops were quickly disarmed. [38] Some sources indicate that Maksimović's withdrawal from the city was negotiated and made in exchange for the promise that the San Marzano's troops would not enter Rijeka, [36] but remain in nearby Opatija (Italian: Abbazia) instead. [39] Even though neither Rijeka nor Sušak were awarded to Italy under the Treaty of London, Italian authorities justified the deployment by referring to provisions of the armistice allowing occupation of additional territories required for strategic purposes. [40] On such grounds, the Allied troops occupied Rijeka, Sušak, as well as the area of Kostrena (Italian: Costrena) and Draga  [ hr ] to the Bakar (Italian: Buccari) railway station, and a part of the Grobnik area. On 12 December 1918, Italian cavalry attempted to advance into Kraljevica (Italian: Porto Re), but it was repulsed by the Royal Yugoslav Army. [41] By spring of 1919, there were approximately 20,000 Italian troops in Rijeka. [42] The Adriatic Commission discussed the Italian military dominance in the British zone and recommended the Paris Peace Conference to ensure military parity with other allied forces. Since the recommendation was objected to by Italy, the Paris Peace Conference ultimately did not act upon it. [43] Between January and August 1919, the Italian National Council took steps to ensure independence of the city from the systems previously put in place by Austria-Hungary. Postage stamps and Austro-Hungarian krone banknotes were stamped over, and the Fiume krone introduced in circulation. In August 1919, the council investigated civil servants, dismissing and expelling undesirable ones. [24]

On 6 July, paramilitary Legione "Fiumana"  [ it ] loyal to Italy clashed with French Annam troops in the city, killing 13. This prompted establishment of an international commission to determine the responsibility of the legionnaires. The commission recommended disbanding Legione "Fiumana" and reduction of Italian troops in the area to a single battalion as quickly as possible, leaving law enforcement to the British and the US forces. Those recommendations were not implemented. [44] However, the 1st Regiment "Granatieri di Sardegna" was withdrawn from the city and moved to Ronchi dei Monfalcone near Trieste on 27 August 1919. [42]

Paris Peace Conference negotiations

Rjecina River separating Rijeka (right) from Susak (left); Italian-Yugoslav border (1925) is shown as a white dashed line Granica Susak Rijeka 1925.JPG
Rječina River separating Rijeka (right) from Sušak (left); Italian–Yugoslav border (1925) is shown as a white dashed line

The problem of establishing the border between Italy and the Yugoslavia—referred to as the Adriatic question—including the Fiume question became major points of dispute at the Paris Peace Conference. [45] Since 1917, Italy used the issue of the annexation of Kingdom of Montenegro by Serbia, or the unification of the countries, known as the Montenegrin question, to pressure Serbia into making concessions regarding Italian demands. [46] While the Italian representatives at the peace conference were demanding enforcement of the Treaty of London and the additional award of Rijeka, US President Woodrow Wilson opposed their demands and put forward his Fourteen Points, which favoured a solution that relied on local self-determination, [47] arguing that the Treaty of London was invalid. [48] Instead, Wilson proposed a division of the Istrian peninsula along the Wilson Line that largely corresponded to the ethnic makeup of the population, [45] and a free-city status for Rijeka based on the city's legal position of a corpus separatum within Austria-Hungary. [49] The British and French did not support enforcement of the treaty, as they thought Italy deserved relatively little due to its neutrality early in the war. [47]

After the Allies had rejected the Italian claims under the Treaty of London and claims regarding Rijeka and the Vittorio Emanuele Orlando's government was replaced in June 1919 by that led by Francesco Saverio Nitti, the new prime minister wanted to settle diplomatic issues abroad, before concentrating on domestic issues. In that respect, foreign minister Tommaso Tittoni was inclined to agree with the British and the French that Rijeka should be a free city under the League of Nations and that the entire Dalmatia should belong to Yugoslavia. [50]

D'Annunzio's march on Rijeka

Residents of Rijeka cheering Gabriele D'Annunzio in 1919 Fiume cheering D'Annunzio.jpg
Residents of Rijeka cheering Gabriele D'Annunzio in 1919

In order to preempt an unfavourable settlement of the issue, Gabriele D'Annunzio set out with approximately two hundred veterans to Rijeka in the evening of 11 September. [50] When the column reached Ronchi del Monfalcone, it was joined by the Granatieri di Sardegna. Now about 2,500-strong, the column proceeded towards Rijeka and reached it the next day. [42] In response to D'Annunzio's arrival, Italian and other allied troops withdrew from the city. [50] D'Annunzio spoke from the governor’s mansion balcony the same day announcing annexation of the city to Italy. Nitti’s government did not approve of the D’Annunzio’s move, [51] but it did not act. Italian right-wing politicians were considering the possibility of a coup d’etat. The government felt it was losing control over army and military governor of Julian March General Pietro Badoglio reported he could not prevent officers and soldiers from defecting to D’Annunzio. A government minister told the US ambassador that Italy was on the verge of a civil war. [52]

By late 1919, Yugoslav representatives led by former Prime Minister Nikola Pašić and foreign minister Ante Trumbić, could not agree with Italian diplomats on the border. In response, they were instructed by the Allies to settle the issue through direct negotiations after the Paris Peace Conference. [53] A particular obstacle to any agreement was D'Annunzio's occupation of Rijeka, which caused the Italian government to reject a draft agreement submitted by the United Kingdom, the United States, and France. Pašić's and Trumbić's refusal to agree to the plan provoked the French and British to threaten that the Treaty of London would be enforced unless they supported the allied proposal. In turn, Wilson blocked the Franco-British move by threatening to stop ratification of the Treaty of Versailles by the US. [54] In Croatia, the inability of the Yugoslav government to obtain a favourable solution of the Fiume question was interpreted as a result of government's disinterest in issues not affecting Serbia directly. [55]

In Italy, contemporaries interpreted D'Annunzio's march as a symbolic revival of the spirit of 1862 Garibaldi's march on Rome and as a foreshadowing of Benito Mussolini's 1922 March on Rome. [56] His capture of Rijeka is deemed a symbol of Italian fascism, [57] and its formative event. [58] Disorder in the territories occupied after the war, contributed to the rise of fascism through discrediting of parliamentarianism and fostering aspirations to become a strong authoritarian state. Italian historian Roberto Vivarelli  [ it ] pointed out the events related to the Fiume question as the source of opposition to traditional processes of the state. [59]

Interwar border agreements

A view of the Italian-Yugoslav border in the Port of Rijeka in 1937 Granica izmedu Rijeke i Susaka 1937.JPG
A view of the Italian–Yugoslav border in the Port of Rijeka in 1937
Gabrielle D'Annunzio inspecting troops in Rijeka in 1920 Dannunzio-scudetto.jpg
Gabrielle D'Annunzio inspecting troops in Rijeka in 1920

From spring 1920, the United Kingdom and France applied pressure on Yugoslav prime minister Milenko Radomar Vesnić, and foreign minister Trumbić to resolve the Adriatic question, claiming that it represented a threat to peace in Europe. [60] At the same time, the Italian foreign minister, Carlo Sforza, indicated he was ready to trade Italian claims in Dalmatia for British and French backing of Italian claims in Istria. [61] In June, Hungary formally renounced its possession of Corpus Separatum through the Treaty of Trianon. [62] In September 1920, Sforza told the President of France, Alexandre Millerand, that he only wanted to enforce the Treaty of London regarding Istria and that he wanted none of Dalmatia except the city of Zadar. [63] At the same time, on 8 September, D’Annunzio proclaimed independence of the city and its surroundings, styled as the Italian Regency of Carnaro. [64] Following the 1920 presidential election, US support for Wilson's ideas appeared to have ended, [65] compelling Vesnić and Trumbić into bilateral negotiations with Sforza. [61] Moreover, Prince Regent Alexander I of Yugoslavia wanted an agreement with Italy at any cost, [60] in pursuit of political stability in the country. [66] According to Sforza, Vesnić later told him he was advised not to resist Italian demands for fear that Italy might impose a solution unilaterally. [67]

Sforza's treaty proposal was supported by the British and French, while the US remained silent on the matter, leaving Yugoslavs isolated. [63] He demanded Istria and the Snežnik (Italian: Monte Nevoso). Negotiations took place between 9–11 November 1920, resulting in the Treaty of Rapallo signed on 12 November. [68] The treaty gave Italy Istria, Julian March, a portion of the Kvarner Gulf just to the west of Rijeka as well as the city of Zadar (Italian: Zara) and a number of islands. [69] The treaty also established the independent Free State of Fiume, defining its boundaries as those of the former Austro-Hungarian Corpus Separatum, with the addition of a strip of land connecting it to the Italian territory in Istria between the Kvarner Gulf and the town of Kastav (Italian: Castua).

D'Annunzio condemned the treaty in a declaration of 17 November. The Italian Regency of Carnaro proclaimed a state of war four days later. [67] By the end of the year, the Regia Marina drove D'Annunzio from Rijeka in an intervention known as Bloody Christmas. [70] The five-day military intervention came after a failed Italian diplomatic effort to persuade D'Annunzio to leave. The city was blockaded and strategic points bombarded by battleship Andrea Doria. D'Annunzio left the city after the street fighting resulted in 53 killed and 207 wounded legionnaires. [64]

The Treaty of Rapallo left Sušak Yugoslavia, [71] but Italian military would not leave it before March 1923. [72] Negotiations on the Italian pullout continued until an agreement was reached in Santa Margherita Ligure on 1 August 1922 confirming Yugoslav sovereignty over Sušak. However, a further disagreement arose on location of the border. Mussolini, then the newly appointed prime minister, held that Sušak territory was exclusively on the left bank of the Rječina River, but he ultimately conceded to Yugoslav claim of Delta and Baroš areas of the Port of Rijeka on the opposite bank. [73] Rijeka became the city-state envisaged by the Treaty of Rapallo. [70] Following the October 1922 March on Rome, Mussolini ordered military occupation of Rijeka to continue, [74] and Italy formally annexed the city under the Treaty of Rome concluded with Yugoslavia in 1924. The loss of the hinterland served by the Port of Rijeka led to the decline of importance of both the port and the city, despite the introduction of free economic zone privileges. [75] Under the Treaty of Rome, Yugoslavia retained Sušak. [76]

Aftermath

Border bridge spanning Rjecina between Rijeka and Susak in 1933 Granicni most Rijeka 1933.JPG
Border bridge spanning Rječina between Rijeka and Sušak in 1933

During the World War II, on 6 April 1941, Axis powers invaded Yugoslavia and the puppet state of Independent State of Croatia (NDH) was declared four days later by Slavko Kvaternik on behalf of Italian-based fascist organisation of Ustaše. [77] Ustaše leader Ante Pavelić and his followers were equipped by Italy and permitted to drive from Pistoia via Trieste to Zagreb only after publicly endorsing Italian territorial expansion along the eastern Adriatic shore. [78] Those claims were enforced through the 1941 Treaties of Rome, specifically the Italian–Croatian Treaty on Frontiers. It defined the bulk of the border between the NDH and Italy, largely concerning parts of Dalmatia and Adriatic islands. It also gave Italy a strip of land in northwest of Croatia, near Rijeka. [79] There, the border was drawn to give Italy the cities of Kastav, Sušak, Fužine (Italian: Fusine), Čabar, Bakar and a part of the Delnice district. [80]

Following the 1943 Armistice of Cassibile and Italian surrender, Pavelić declared the Treaties of Rome, including the territorial changes agreed under the treaty, void. [81] In his declaration, Pavelić also announced annexation of areas previously outside of Yugoslavia including Rijeka. This move was blocked by Nazi Germany, which established the Operational Zone of the Adriatic Littoral, which included Rijeka. [82]

Yugoslav Partisans took control of Rijeka on 3 May 1945. On 9 and 20 June, authorities of the Democratic Federal Yugoslavia concluded agreements with the United Kingdom and the United States in Belgrade and Duino on administration of specific Italian territories. Those areas included a part of Istria and Julian March organised as the Zone A under Allied administration; and Rijeka with the rest of Istria forming the Zone B governed by the Yugoslav Army Military Administration (Vojna uprava Jugoslavenske armije, VUJA). [83] The VUJA was led by Colonel Većeslav Holjevac. [84] After the World War II, Rijeka and its surroundings were formally ceded by Italy to Yugoslavia (and indirectly to the People's Republic of Croatia) through the 1947 Treaty of Paris between Italy and the Allied Powers. [85] [b] Sušak formally became a part of the city of Rijeka in 1948. [88]

Notes

  1. According to the 1910 Austro-Hungarian census, 23,283 citizens or nearly 47% of Rijeka's population within the Corpus Separatum territory were Italian, while Croats and Slovenes accounted for 19,668 or almost 40%. In December 1918, the Italian National Council conducted a census where 62% were registered as Italians, and 23% as Croats or Slovenes. [18] Croatian sources indicate that the 1918 census data were collected under duress and falsely recorded. [19] Another census was taken in 1925, indicating 79% Italian majority in the city. [18] From 1918 to 1925, the city's demographics changed considerably through settlement of the regnicoli settlers arriving from prewar Italian territories, [20] and departure of Croatian population hastened by increased looting and violence directed against them in response to the death of the captain of the cruiser Puglia in a clash in Split in July 1920. [21] According to contemporary Yugoslav sources, the suburb of Sušak, lying outside the boundaries of the former Corpus Separatum, had the population of 13,214 (of which 11,000 were the South Slavs) in 1918. Contemporary Italian sources did not contest the numbers, but denied that Sušak was an integral part of Rijeka. [22] Sušak's population was estimated at 12,000 in 1919. [23]
  2. Croatian sources estimate that more than 20 thousand people left Rijeka and moved to Italian-controlled territory from 1945 to 1947. [86] Italian sources claim that 31,840 people left Rijeka in the course of the postwar Istrian–Dalmatian exodus lasting more than a decade. [87]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rijeka</span> City in Primorje-Gorski Kotar County, Croatia

Rijeka, also known as Fiume, is the principal seaport and the third-largest city in Croatia. It is located in Primorje-Gorski Kotar County on Kvarner Bay, an inlet of the Adriatic Sea and in 2021 had a population of 108,622 inhabitants. Historically, because of its strategic position and its excellent deep-water port, the city was fiercely contested, especially between the Holy Roman Empire, Italy and Croatia, changing rulers and demographics many times over centuries. According to the 2011 census data, the majority of its citizens are Croats, along with small numbers of Serbs, Bosniaks and Italians.

The Treaty of Rome was agreed on 27 January 1924, when Italy and the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes agreed that Fiume would be annexed to Italy as the Province of Fiume, and the town of Sušak would be part of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty of Rapallo (1920)</span> Treaty between Italy and Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes

The Treaty of Rapallo was an agreement between the Kingdom of Italy and the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes in the aftermath of the First World War. It was intended to settle the Adriatic question, which referred to Italian claims over territories promised to the country in return for its entry into the war against Austria-Hungary, claims that were made on the basis of the 1915 Treaty of London. The wartime pact promised Italy large areas of the eastern Adriatic. The treaty, signed on 12 November 1920 in Rapallo, Italy, generally redeemed the promises of territorial gains in the former Austrian Littoral by awarding Italy territories generally corresponding to the peninsula of Istria and the former Princely County of Gorizia and Gradisca, with the addition of the Snežnik Plateau, in addition to what was promised by the London treaty. The articles regarding Dalmatia were largely ignored. Instead, in Dalmatia, Italy received the city of Zadar and several islands. Other provisions of the treaty contained safeguards for the rights of Italian nationals remaining in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, and provisions for commissions to demarcate the new border, and facilitate economic and educational cooperation. The treaty also established the Free State of Fiume, the city-state consisting of the former Austro-Hungarian Corpus separatum that consisted of Rijeka and a strip of coast giving the new state a land border with Italy at Istria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs</span> 1918 unrecognised pan-Slavic state in Southeast Europe

The State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs was a political entity that was constituted in October 1918, at the end of World War I, by Slovenes, Croats and Serbs (Prečani) residing in what were the southernmost parts of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Although internationally unrecognised, this was the first incarnation of a Yugoslav state founded on the Pan-Slavic ideology. Thirty-three days after it was proclaimed, the state joined the Kingdom of Serbia to form the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty of London (1915)</span> World War I treaty between Italy and the Triple Entente

The Treaty of London or the Pact of London was a secret agreement concluded on 26 April 1915 by the United Kingdom, France, and Russia on the one part, and Italy on the other, in order to entice the latter to enter World War I on the side of the Triple Entente. The agreement involved promises of Italian territorial expansion against Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire and in Africa where it was promised enlargement of its colonies. The Entente countries hoped to force the Central Powers – particularly Germany and Austria-Hungary – to divert some of their forces away from existing battlefields. The Entente also hoped that Romania and Bulgaria would be encouraged to join them after Italy did the same.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Modruš-Rijeka County</span> Historic county of the Kingdom of Croatia-Slavonia

The Modruš-Rijeka County was a historic administrative subdivision of the Kingdom of Croatia-Slavonia. Croatia-Slavonia was an autonomous kingdom within the Lands of the Crown of Saint Stephen (Transleithania), the Hungarian part of the dual Austro-Hungarian Empire. Its territory is now in western Croatia. Modruš is a small town near Ogulin; Rijeka is a large city on the Adriatic coast. However, Rijeka was not part of the Modruš-Rijeka County, but under the direct administration of Hungary. The capital of the county was Ogulin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Julian March</span> Historical region in Croatia, Italy, and Slovenia

The Julian March, also called Julian Venetia, is an area of southern Central Europe which is currently divided among Croatia, Italy, and Slovenia. The term was coined in 1863 by the Italian linguist Graziadio Isaia Ascoli, a native of the area, to demonstrate that the Austrian Littoral, Veneto, Friuli, and Trentino shared a common Italian linguistic identity. Ascoli emphasized the Augustan partition of Roman Italy at the beginning of the Empire, when Venetia et Histria was Regio X.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Free State of Fiume</span> 1920–1924 coastal city-state in modern Croatia

The Free State of Fiume was an independent free state that existed between 1920 and 1924. Its territory of 28 km2 (11 sq mi) comprised the city of Fiume and rural areas to its north, with a corridor to its west connecting it to the Kingdom of Italy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sušak, Rijeka</span> Part of Rijeka, Croatia

Sušak is a part of the city of Rijeka in Croatia, where it composes the eastern part of the city, separated from the city center by the Rječina river, which in former times served as an international border. Notable features of Sušak include the public beaches at Pećina and Glavanovo, along with the Tower Center shopping mall.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Croatian Littoral</span> Geographical region of Croatia

Croatian Littoral is a historical name for the region of Croatia comprising mostly the coastal areas between traditional Dalmatia to the south, Mountainous Croatia to the north, Istria and the Kvarner Gulf of the Adriatic Sea to the west. The term "Croatian Littoral" developed in the 18th and 19th centuries, reflecting the complex development of Croatia in historical and geographical terms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Italian language in Croatia</span>

The Italian language is an official minority language in Croatia, with many schools and public announcements published in both languages. Croatia's proximity and cultural connections to Italy have led to a relatively large presence of Italians in Croatia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Creation of Yugoslavia</span> Overview of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia declaration of independence

Yugoslavia was a state concept among the South Slavic intelligentsia and later popular masses from the 19th to early 20th centuries that culminated in its realization after the 1918 collapse of Austria-Hungary at the end of World War I and the formation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. However, from as early as 1922 onward, the kingdom was better known colloquially as Yugoslavia ; in 1929 the name was made official when the country was formally renamed the "Kingdom of Yugoslavia".

The Croatian Committee was a Croatian political émigré organization, formed in the Summer of 1919, by émigré Frankist politicians and members of the former Austro-Hungarian Army. The organisation opposed the creation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and aimed to achieve Croatia's independence. The Croatian Committee was established in Graz, Austria, before its headquarters were moved to Vienna and then to Budapest, Hungary. It was led by Ivo Frank.

Rijeka, formerly known as Fiume, is a city located in the northern tip of the Kvarner Gulf in the northern Adriatic. It is currently the third-largest city in Croatia. It was part of the Roman province of Dalmatia, and later of the Kingdom of Croatia. It grew during the 12th to 14th centuries as a seaport within the Holy Roman Empire, trading with Italian cities. Under the rule of the House of Habsburg from 1466, it was made a free city; and, although part of the Duchy of Carniola, it developed local self-government.

<i>Corpus separatum</i> (Fiume) City of Fiume under the Kingdom of Hungary (1779–1918)

Corpus separatum, a Latin term meaning "separated body", refers to the status of the City of Fiume while given a special legal and political status different from its environment under the rule of the Kingdom of Hungary. Formally known as City of Fiume and its District, it was instituted by Empress Maria Theresa in 1779, determining the semi-autonomous status of Fiume within the Habsburg monarchy until the fall of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1918.

The Bloody Christmas of 1920 was a series of clashes in Fiume, which led to the conclusion of the Fiume campaign that was carried out by the Italian poet, adventurer, and proto-fascist Gabriele D'Annunzio in 1920.

In the aftermath of the First World War, the Adriatic question or Adriatic problem concerned the fate of the territories along the eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea that formerly belonged to the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The roots of the dispute lay in the secret Treaty of London, signed during the war, and in growing nationalism, especially Italian irredentism and Yugoslavism, which led ultimately to the creation of Yugoslavia. The question was a major barrier to agreement at the Paris Peace Conference, but was partially resolved by the Treaty of Rapallo between Italy and Yugoslavia on 12 November 1920.

The National Council of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs claimed to represent South Slavs living in Austria-Hungary and, after its dissolution, in the short-lived State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs. The council's membership was largely drawn from various representative bodies operating in the Habsburg crown lands inhabited by South Slavs. The founding of the National Council in Zagreb on 8 October 1918 fulfilled the Zagreb Resolution to concentrate South Slavic political forces, adopted earlier that year on the initiative of the Yugoslav Club. The council elected Anton Korošec as the president and Svetozar Pribićević and Ante Pavelić as vice-presidents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ivo Frank</span> Croatian lawyer and politician (1877–1939)

Ivo Frank was a Croatian politician and lawyer, and member of the Party of Rights. Frank gained prominence as a member of the group that tore down a Hungarian flag to protest the 1895 visit by Emperor Franz Joseph to Zagreb. He was elected a member of the Kingdom of Croatia-Slavonia's parliament in the final decade of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Before the dissolution of Austria-Hungary, Frank advocated for trialist reform of the empire as a means of protection against the Magyarisation and Serbian irredentism. Following the establishment of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes in 1918, Frank left the country to lead the émigré Croatian Committee, which advocated for Croatian independence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Allied occupation of the eastern Adriatic</span> Occupation of the eastern Adriatic after World War I

The occupation of the eastern Adriatic was a military mission of Allies of World War I conducted in the aftermath of the World War I, from November 1918 to September 1921. It involved deployment of naval assets and troops of the United Kingdom, the Kingdom of Italy, France, and the United States to parts of the territory of former Austria-Hungary, especially the region of Dalmatia and the city of Rijeka, as well as to the coastal areas of the Kingdom of Montenegro. The occupation was meant to resolve a number of issues, including disposal of assets of the Austro-Hungarian Navy, and settlement of Italian territorial claims on the eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea. Those claims, largely corresponding to the award made under the Treaty of London used to entice Italy to enter the war on the side of the allies, conflicted with the territorial claims of the nascent Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and its predecessor states, as well as the principle of self-determination outlined in the Fourteen Points of President Woodrow Wilson.

References

  1. Ramet 2006, pp. 41–42.
  2. Pavlowitch 2003, p. 36.
  3. Banac 1984, p. 129.
  4. Matijević 2008, p. 50.
  5. Merlicco 2021, pp. 119–120.
  6. Ramet 2006, pp. 43–44.
  7. 1 2 Bali 2013, p. 25.
  8. Horel 2016, pp. 282–283.
  9. Ordasi 2022, p. 389.
  10. Horel 2016, p. 284.
  11. 1 2 Bali & Gulyás 2011, pp. 143–144.
  12. Ramet 2006, p. 40.
  13. Pavlowitch 2003, p. 32.
  14. Banac 1984, pp. 125–126.
  15. Ramet 2006, pp. 42–43.
  16. Batović & Kasalo 2021, pp. 304–305.
  17. MacMillan 2002, p. 293.
  18. 1 2 Patafta 2004, p. 691.
  19. Patafta 2006, p. 204.
  20. Patafta 2004, p. 692.
  21. Patafta 2004, p. 694.
  22. Tamaro 1919, pp. 9–10.
  23. Zgrablić 2005, p. 229.
  24. 1 2 3 Bali & Gulyás 2011, p. 144.
  25. 1 2 3 4 5 Bartulović 2013, p. 168.
  26. 1 2 Bartulović 2021, p. 79.
  27. 1 2 Ordasi 2022, p. 415.
  28. Strčić 1981, p. 136.
  29. Bartulović 2013, pp. 165–167.
  30. Patafta 2006, p. 201.
  31. Drinković 2023, p. 1138.
  32. Lanchester 1950.
  33. Prister 2019, p. 172.
  34. Cipriani 2016, p. 91.
  35. Drinković 2023, pp. 1139–1140.
  36. 1 2 3 Drinković 2023, p. 1142.
  37. Drinković 2023, p. 1141.
  38. Patafta 2006, p. 202.
  39. Bartulović 2013, n. 44.
  40. Bartulović 2013, p. 170.
  41. Bartulović 2000, pp. 959–960.
  42. 1 2 3 Prister 2019, p. 170.
  43. Davidonis 1943, pp. 52–53.
  44. Bartulović 2013, p. 171.
  45. 1 2 Rudolf 2008, p. 63.
  46. Pavlović 2008, p. 97.
  47. 1 2 Burgwyn 1997, pp. 4–8.
  48. Hill 1934, pp. 60–61.
  49. Kernek 1982, p. 266.
  50. 1 2 3 MacMillan 2002, pp. 301–302.
  51. Bali & Gulyás 2011, p. 148.
  52. Cattaruzza 2011, pp. 71–72.
  53. Rudolf 2008, p. 64.
  54. Kernek 1982, p. 286.
  55. Bartulović 2000, p. 962.
  56. Gumbrecht 1996, p. 253.
  57. Gumbrecht 1996, p. 254.
  58. Gumbrecht 1996, p. 256.
  59. Cattaruzza 2011, pp. 72–73.
  60. 1 2 Repe 2008, pp. 111–112.
  61. 1 2 Burgwyn 1997, pp. 15–16.
  62. Bartulović 2021, p. 85.
  63. 1 2 Lowe & Marzari 1975, p. 178.
  64. 1 2 Bali & Gulyás 2011, p. 150.
  65. Kernek 1982, p. 295.
  66. Diklić 2011, p. 231.
  67. 1 2 Bartulović 2000, pp. 963–964.
  68. Pizzi 2001, p. 13.
  69. Current History 1921, pp. 223–225.
  70. 1 2 Knox 2007, p. 276.
  71. Current History 1921, p. 225.
  72. Strčić 1981, p. 142.
  73. Bartulović 2013, p. 174.
  74. Adriano & Cingolani 2018, p. 24.
  75. Perinčić 2022, p. 112.
  76. Bali 2013, p. 27.
  77. Tomasevich 2002, pp. 51–52.
  78. Tomasevich 2002, pp. 58–59.
  79. Tomasevich 2002, p. 237.
  80. Degan 2008, pp. 272–273.
  81. Tomasevich 2002, pp. 299–300.
  82. Degan 2008, p. 276.
  83. Roknić Bežanić 2012, pp. 164–165.
  84. Roknić Bežanić 2012, p. 166.
  85. Fifield 1948, pp. 537–538.
  86. Badurina 2014, pp. 126–127.
  87. Roknić Bežanić 2012, p. 175.
  88. Badurina 2014, p. 129.

Sources

Further reading