Logic-based therapy

Last updated

Logic-based therapy (LBT) is a modality of philosophical counseling developed by philosopher Elliot D. Cohen beginning in the mid-1980s. It is a philosophical variant of rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT), which was developed by psychologist Albert Ellis. [1] [2] [3] A randomized, controlled efficacy study of LBT suggests that it may be effective in reducing anxiety. [4]

Contents

Comparison to REBT

According to the theory of LBT, people decide to make themselves upset emotionally and behaviorally by deducing self-defeating emotional and behavioral conclusions from irrational premises. [5] [6] LBT retains the theoretical base of the cognitive-behavioral psychotherapies, insofar as it contends emotional and behavioral problems to be rooted in malignant and maladaptive thought processes and patterns. LBT considers itself not only a type of philosophical counseling, but a form of cognitive-behavioral therapy. At the same time, LBT remains firmly planted in philosophy by way of the use of formal logic, informal logic, phenomenological intentionality, and philosophical antidotes in conceptualizing and treating mental disorders and psychosocial difficulties.

According to classical REBT, there are three psychological points:

Ellis argued that the Activating event itself (A) does not cause people to be upset (C); they require also a set of Beliefs that, in conjunction with the event, can contribute to a self-defeating behavioral and emotional Consequence. [7] For example, it is not only the divorce (A) that causes depression (C), but also the belief that this event is awful and the worst thing that could have happened (B). Thus, according to Ellis, by finding the particular Activating event and Belief, one can find out what is causing one's depression (C). Clients can then work on changing their Belief system and their behavior to overcome the depression (C).

LBT recasts REBT's A-B-C model of psychological disturbance into syllogistic logic. [8] According to its logic-based approach, the causal model Ellis advanced is not accurate. [9] The depression is not caused by events that occur inside (Point B) and outside (Point A) one's subjective world. Instead, one becomes depressed by deducing a conclusion from a set of premises. [5]

For example, one may become depressed by setting up this syllogism:

  1. If I was divorced, then what happened to me is so terrible that I might as well be dead.
  2. I was divorced.
  3. So, what happened to me is so terrible that I might as well be dead.

Practical syllogistic ratings

A syllogism is a deductive form of reasoning having two premises and a conclusion. The idea that the reasoning behind our emotions and behavior can be so ordered in terms of a syllogism was in fact an insight of Aristotle, who called this kind of syllogism a "practical syllogism." The distinction is that the conclusion evaluates or rates the thing in question instead of merely describing it. For example, in concluding that something is terrible, a person is negatively rating it, and therefore will act or tend to act and feel negatively toward it. In fact, Aristotle went so far as to claim that the conclusion of a practical syllogism was always an action. [10]

According to LBT, by syllogizing one's behavioral and emotional reasoning in terms of the practical syllogism, one is in a better position to find one's irrational premises, refute them, and replace the unsound reasoning with sound "antidotal" reasoning. [11] For example, the first premise in the above syllogism is irrational because one is exaggerating just how bad the divorce is (thinking of it as though it were on the level of a catastrophic disease or natural disaster).

LBT also accepts the phenomenological thesis that every mental state, including emotions, has a so-called "intentional object" or "object of the mind." That is, there is always an object to which a mental state refers or is about. Thus, if one is depressed, then one is depressed about something. This intentional object is represented in the descriptive minor premise of the emotional reasoning, for example, the premise "I was divorced" in the aforementioned syllogism. [12] In addition, the syllogisms comprising emotional reasoning always rate the emotional object or some aspect of it. [12] For example, in the aforementioned syllogism, one rates one's divorce as being "terrible". This rating element is represented in the consequent (then clause) of the major premise of the syllogism, as in the premise "If I was divorced, then what happened to me is so terrible that I might as well be dead."

Accordingly, the syllogism comprising one's emotional reasoning can be constructed by first finding the intentional object (O) of one's emotion; and second, by finding the rating (R) of the emotion. As such, the valid, hypothetical structure of a syllogism comprising one's emotional reasoning can be symbolized as follows:

  1. If O then R
  2. O
  3. Therefore R

Further, according to LBT, all emotions can be uniquely identified by their intentional object (O) and rating (R) elements. [12] For example, the intentional object of anger is always an action; and the rating is a strong negative evaluation of the action itself or the agent of the action. In depression, the intentional object is an event or state of affairs; and the rating is a strong negative evaluation on the basis of which one strongly negatively rates one's own existence. Thus, one may rate one's divorce as terrible, on the basis of which one gives one's own existence a strong negative evaluation.

Higher order premises

LBT permits clients to trace their inferences to higher order premises that might be at the root of an emotional and behavioral disturbance. [13] For example, by questioning why having been divorced is so bad, another higher level syllogism can be uncovered:

  1. If I was divorced, then that makes me a worthless loser.
  2. If that makes me a worthless loser then what happened to me is so terrible that I might as well be dead.
  3. So, if I was divorced, what happened to me is so terrible that I might as well be dead.

Even higher order premises at the root of the behavioral and emotional disturbance can be uncovered, for example, by asking why being divorced makes one a worthless loser. For example, this higher order syllogism might be uncovered:

  1. I must always be perfect and never fail at anything.
  2. If I must always be perfect and never fail at anything, then if I was divorced, that makes me a worthless loser.
  3. So, if I was a divorced then that makes me a worthless loser.

In this way, the depression can be traced back to a demand for perfection from which a person is deducing their own worthlessness, from which they are in turn deducing the horribleness of what happened.

Comparison to psychotherapy

While LBT is a form of philosophical counseling, since it addresses client's emotional problems and provides systematic ways of resolving them, it can also be considered a form of psychotherapy. More specifically, because of its focus on the client's cognitions and behaviors in relation to emotional functioning and relationship with REBT, it is also a type of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). However, LBT differentiates itself from some other forms of CBT by emphasizing how premises about emotions are deduced and inferred from experiences in the world: LBT suggests that all emotional responses have a logical structure to them. The fact that emotions contain logical structures which can be subject to investigation and revision was also supported in the philosopher Robert C. Solomon's cognitivist theory of emotions. [14]

LBT further differs from other forms of psychotherapy. For example, psychoanalytic or psychodynamic traditions will look for the underlying causes of emotional problems. These approaches will explore the client's early relationships with significant others (e.g., parental figures) and their effect on current relationships and resultant emotional and behavioral disturbances. Interpretation is utilized to provide the client with insights into their psychic organization. In contrast (but like other types of CBT), LBT does not place any particular emphasis on past relationships or the causes of problems and is even less concerned with interpretation. Instead, LBT remains philosophical insofar as it examines reasoning and logical structures created by client. The emphasis is not on the "why" of a problem, but on the "how"; that is, how the person deduces their emotional position and ways in which to alter it for more adaptive thinking and functioning.

LBT's positive psychology

In contrast to classical REBT, LBT identifies positive virtues that can guide a person in overcoming irrational beliefs. [15] [16] According to LBT, all basic irrational beliefs ("cardinal fallacies") identified by REBT theorists and philosophers are related to "transcendent virtues" that can overcome them. [17] LBT thereby includes a "positive psychology" in addition to the classical REBT emphasis on refuting irrational beliefs.

As a philosophical counseling approach, LBT also applies philosophical antidotes derived from the philosophies of antiquity to help clients strive toward their transcendent virtues. [16] For example, the Kantian categorical imperative that says to "treat oneself and others as ends in themselves and not as mere means" can be used as an antidote to damnation of self or others, and thus as a sort of recipe to attaining the transcendent virtue of respect for self and others. Similarly, Frederich Nietzsche's theory about human suffering, which says that suffering can make one stronger and nobler, can be used as an antidote to catastrophic thinking ("Awfulizing") about personal loss, thereby building courage in confronting the loss and using it to create new positive meanings and values in one's existence.

The following chart displays each such irrational belief and its respective trumping virtue: [16]

Cardinal fallacyTranscendent virtue
Demanding perfectionMetaphysical security (security about reality)
AwfulizingCourage (in face of evil)
Damnation (of self, others, and the universe)Respect (for self, others, and the universe)
Jumping on the bandwagonAuthenticity (self-determination)
Can'tstipationTemperance (self-control)
Dutiful worryingMoral creativity (in confronting and resolving problems)
ManipulationEmpowerment of others
The world revolves around meEmpathy (connecting with others)
Oversimplifying realityGood judgment (in making objective, unbiased discernments in practical affairs)
Distorting probabilitiesForesightedness (in assessing probabilities)
Blind conjectureScientificity (in providing explanations)

Cultivation of willpower

LBT also emphasizes willpower in changing and redirecting beliefs and actions. [18] While it makes no commitment to the existence of free will in any metaphysical sense, it recognizes the practical value of building "willpower muscle" as a means to overcome cognitive dissonance and attain one's transcendent virtues. LBT emphasizes and promotes the power that one has to change the way in which an event or situation is interpreted by altering one's thought patterns.

LBT's emphasis on the "willpower muscle" suggests the ability of agency and choice in regard to therapeutic change. Based upon the rejection of a deterministic causative framework in favor of a nondeterministic perspective, LBT maintains compatibility with existentialism and existential psychotherapy. This position of choice is central to existentialist philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre's thinking on human freedom and responsibility, which is one of existential psychotherapist Irvin Yalom's "existential givens". [19] Here, clients are encouraged to confront their inherent freedom by way of choosing how to interpret situations. As philosopher Martin Heidegger and others have suggested, [20] [21] [22] clients can become a "master over moods" by taking responsibility for their moods and emotions and subsequently revising them. Furthermore, this can lead to different ways of thinking about and experiencing the world with the accompanied creation of new meanings in life.

Criticisms and limitations

LBT emphasizes the client's use of deductive logic in their emotional reasoning, which places focus on the cognitive aspect of emotion. As such, it ignores the importance of physiological states and bodily sensations to emotional life, and might be an overly cognitive approach and a way to "control" emotions. However, LBT contends that it is the entire experience that contributes to the person's emotional reasoning. This includes the experienced event, any thoughts or beliefs related to the event as well as physiological reactions. Although an activating event, such as a divorce or loss of a job, objectively is not on the same level as a catastrophic event, rushing to the conclusion that it is irrational for the client to think that way is potentially invalidating the intensity of the client's subjective emotional experience. Regardless, empathic understanding and the building of therapeutic rapport is an important component to all psychotherapies and counseling methods and is no less important in LBT.

With a LBT counselor's knowledge of deductive logic, a power differential may be created between the counselor and the client. This could result in the client seeking the "correct" way of deducing premises and develop an overreliance on the LBT counselor. However, the goal is to create more flexible and open ways of interpreting the world and extinguish "absolutist" thinking or unrealistic expectations as a result of a collaborative therapeutic relationship. However, understanding and changing one's inferences and logical structures requires a certain level of intellectual ability, and consequently, may limit the application.

While LBT may be conceptually sound and have firm theoretical roots, much of psychotherapy and counseling research emphasizes the importance of evidence-based practice, that is, interventions and therapeutic approaches that have scientific evidence for their efficacy. [23] Given this, to establish LBT's efficacy and effectiveness, further empirical validation must occur through psychotherapy research methodology.

See also

Related Research Articles

Rationality is the quality of being guided by or based on reason. In this regard, a person acts rationally if they have a good reason for what they do or a belief is rational if it is based on strong evidence. This quality can apply to an ability, as in a rational animal, to a psychological process, like reasoning, to mental states, such as beliefs and intentions, or to persons who possess these other forms of rationality. A thing that lacks rationality is either arational, if it is outside the domain of rational evaluation, or irrational, if it belongs to this domain but does not fulfill its standards.

Psychology is an academic and applied discipline involving the scientific study of human mental functions and behavior. Occasionally, in addition or opposition to employing the scientific method, it also relies on symbolic interpretation and critical analysis, although these traditions have tended to be less pronounced than in other social sciences, such as sociology. Psychologists study phenomena such as perception, cognition, emotion, personality, behavior, and interpersonal relationships. Some, especially depth psychologists, also study the unconscious mind.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Albert Ellis</span> American psychologist (1913–2007)

Albert Ellis was an American psychologist and psychotherapist who founded rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT). He held MA and PhD degrees in clinical psychology from Columbia University, and was certified by the American Board of Professional Psychology (ABPP). He also founded, and was the President of, the New York City-based Albert Ellis Institute. He is generally considered to be one of the originators of the cognitive revolutionary paradigm shift in psychotherapy and an early proponent and developer of cognitive-behavioral therapies.

Irrationality is cognition, thinking, talking, or acting without rationality.

A cognitive distortion is an exaggerated or irrational thought pattern involved in the onset or perpetuation of psychopathological states, such as depression and anxiety.

Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT), previously called rational therapy and rational emotive therapy, is an active-directive, philosophically and empirically based psychotherapy, the aim of which is to resolve emotional and behavioral problems and disturbances and to help people to lead happier and more fulfilling lives.

Low frustration tolerance (LFT), or "short-term hedonism," is a concept utilized to describe the inability to tolerate unpleasant feelings or stressful situations. It stems from the feeling that reality should be as wished, and that any frustration should be resolved quickly and easily. People with low frustration tolerance experience emotional disturbance when frustrations are not quickly resolved. Behaviors are then directed towards avoiding frustrating events which, paradoxically, leads to increased frustration and even greater mental stress.

Cognitive restructuring (CR) is a psychotherapeutic process of learning to identify and dispute irrational or maladaptive thoughts known as cognitive distortions, such as all-or-nothing thinking (splitting), magical thinking, overgeneralization, magnification, and emotional reasoning, which are commonly associated with many mental health disorders. CR employs many strategies, such as Socratic questioning, thought recording, and guided imagery, and is used in many types of therapies, including cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and rational emotive behaviour therapy (REBT). A number of studies demonstrate considerable efficacy in using CR-based therapies.

Daniel David is a Romanian academic. He is "Aaron T. Beck" professor of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy at the Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca. He was the head of the Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy of the Babeş-Bolyai University between 2007 and 2012. Daniel David is also an adjunct professor at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and is the head of the Research Program at Albert Ellis Institute in New York.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outline of thought</span> Overview of and topical guide to thought

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to thought (thinking):

Cognitive therapy (CT) is a type of psychotherapy developed by American psychiatrist Aaron T. Beck. CT is one therapeutic approach within the larger group of cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) and was first expounded by Beck in the 1960s. Cognitive therapy is based on the cognitive model, which states that thoughts, feelings and behavior are all connected, and that individuals can move toward overcoming difficulties and meeting their goals by identifying and changing unhelpful or inaccurate thinking, problematic behavior, and distressing emotional responses. This involves the individual working with the therapist to develop skills for testing and changing beliefs, identifying distorted thinking, relating to others in different ways, and changing behaviors. A cognitive case conceptualization is developed by the cognitive therapist as a guide to understand the individual's internal reality, select appropriate interventions and identify areas of distress.

Arbitrary inference is a classic tenet of cognitive therapy created by Aaron T. Beck in 1979. He defines the act of making an arbitrary inference as the process of drawing a conclusion without sufficient evidence, or without any evidence at all. In cases of depression, Beck found that individuals may be more prone to cognitive distortions, and make arbitrary inferences more often. These inferences could be general and/or in reference to the effectiveness of their medicine or treatment. Arbitrary inference is one of numerous specific cognitive distortions identified by Beck that can be commonly presented in people with anxiety, depression, and psychological impairments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stoicism</span> Philosophical system

Stoicism is a school of Hellenistic philosophy that flourished in Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome. The Stoics believed that the practice of virtue is enough to achieve eudaimonia: a well-lived life. The Stoics identified the path to achieving it with a life spent practicing the four virtues in everyday life: wisdom, courage, temperance or moderation, and justice, and living in accordance with nature. It was founded in the ancient Agora of Athens by Zeno of Citium around 300 BC.

Philosophical consultancy, also sometimes called philosophical practice or philosophical counseling or clinical philosophy, is a contemporary movement in practical philosophy. Developing since the 1980s as a profession but since the 1950s as a practice, practitioners of philosophical counseling ordinarily have a doctorate or minimally a master's degree in philosophy and offer their philosophical counseling or consultation services to clients who look for a philosophical understanding of their lives, social problems, or even mental problems. In the last case, philosophical counseling might be in lieu of, or in conjunction with, psychotherapy. The movement has often been said to be rooted in the Socratic tradition, which viewed philosophy as a search for the Good and the good life. A life without philosophy was not worth living for Socrates. This led to the philosophy of Stoicism, for example, resulting in Stoic therapy.

Rational behavior therapy (RBT) is a form of cognitive behavioral therapy developed by psychiatrist Maxie Clarence Maultsby Jr., a professor at the Medical College at Howard University. RBT is designed to be a short term therapy which is based on discovering an unsuspected problem which creates unwanted mental, emotional and physical behaviors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maxie Clarence Maultsby Jr.</span>

Maxie Clarence Maultsby Jr. was an American psychiatrist, author of several books on emotional and behavioral self-management, Elected Distinguished Life Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association, and recipient of the Lifetime Achievement Award from the National Association of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapists. He is the founder of the method of psychotherapy called Rational Behavior Therapy, the emotional self-help technique called Rational Self-Counseling, and the New Self-Help Alcoholic Relapse Prevention Treatment Method. He was an Emeritus Professor at the College of Medicine at Howard University in Washington D.C.

Psychagogy is a psycho-therapeutic method of influencing behavior by suggesting desirable life goals. In a more spiritual context, it can mean guidance of the soul. It is considered to be one of many antecedents and components of modern psychology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mike Abrams (psychologist)</span> American psychologist

Mike Abrams is an American psychologist and co-author with Albert Ellis of several works on rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). He is best known for extending CBT to include principles of evolutionary psychology and collaborating with the founder of CBT Albert Ellis to develop many new applications to for these clinical modalities. His new clinical method which applies evolutionary psychology and behavioral genetics to CBT is called Informed Cognitive Therapy (ICT).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kishor Phadke</span> Indian psychologist (1936–2022)

Kishor Moreshwar Phadke, also known as K. M. Phadke, was an Indian psychologist, and practitioner and trainer in Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT). He held M.A. degree in psychology from Pune University. He is first Indian psychologist who enjoys the unique distinction of being a fellow and supervisor of the Albert Ellis Institute in New York City. He is best known as a pioneer of REBT in India. Due to his distinguished contributions to REBT, Indian psychologists consigned a unique title to his therapy – Ellis-Phadke therapy. He has authored nine Marathi books, several popular articles and papers and co-authored five English books.

References

  1. ↑ Raabe, Peter B. (2001). Philosophical Counseling: Theory and Practice. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  2. ↑ Schuster, Schlomit (1999). Philosophy Practice: An Alternative to Counseling and Psychotherapy. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  3. ↑ Cohen, Elliot D. (1987). "The Use of Syllogism in Rational-Emotive Therapy". Journal of Counseling & Development . 66 (1): 37–39. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1987.tb00779.x.
  4. ↑ Cohen, Elliot D.; Piozzini, Barbara; Bapat, Chinmay; Cheng, Jiuqing; Soza, Pablo Tagore Palma; Punjani, Vishakha N.; Chaukar, Himani (2023-11-30). "A Randomized, Controlled, Preliminary Study to Assess the Efficacy of Logic-Based Therapy in Reducing Anxiety and/or Depression in Family Caregivers". Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy. doi: 10.1007/s10942-023-00532-z . ISSN   1573-6563.
  5. 1 2 Robertson, Donald (2000). "REBT, Philosophy, and Philosophical Counseling". Practical Philosophy. 3. 3.
  6. ↑ Cohen, Elliot D. (1995). 'Philosophical Counseling: Some Roles of Critical Thinking'. In Ran Lahav & Maria Da Venza Tillmans (ed.) Essays in Philosophical Counseling. New York: University Presses of America. pp. 121–131.
  7. ↑ Ellis, Albert (2001). Overcoming Destructive Beliefs, Feelings, and Behaviors . Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. ISBN   9781573928793.
  8. ↑ Cohen, Elliot D. (1992). "Syllogizing RET: Applying Formal Logic in Rational-Emotive Therapy". Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy. 1. 10 (4): 235–252. doi:10.1007/BF01062377. S2CID   144748042.
  9. ↑ Cohen, Elliot D. (2006). "Principles of Logic-Based Therapy". Practical Philosophy. 2. 6.
  10. ↑ McKeon, Richard (1941). The Basic Works of Aristotle . New York: Random House.
  11. ↑ Cohen, Elliot D. (2003). What Would Aristotle Do? Self-Control Through the Power of Reason. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
  12. 1 2 3 Cohen, Elliot D. (2009). Critical Thinking Unleashed. Landham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  13. ↑ Cohen, Elliot D. (2003). "The Process of Logic-Based Therapy". Pratiche Filosofiche. 2.
  14. ↑ Solomon, R. C. (1993) [1976]. The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life . Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
  15. ↑ Tukiainen, Arto. "Philosophical Counselling as a Process of Fostering Wisdom in the Form of Virtues" (PDF). Retrieved 14 September 2011.
  16. 1 2 3 Cohen, Elliot D. (2006). The New Rational Therapy: Thinking Your Way to Serenity, Success, and Profound Happiness. Landham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  17. ↑ Martin, Mike w. (2007). "Happiness, Virtue, and Truth in Cohen's Logic-Based Therapy". International Journal of Applied Philosophy . 1. 21: 129–133. doi:10.5840/ijap200721122.
  18. ↑ Cohen, Elliot D. "Logic-Based Therapy: The New Philosophical Frontier for REBT". Archived from the original on 30 August 2011. Retrieved 9 September 2011.
  19. ↑ Yalom, I. (1980). Existential Psychotherapy . New York: Basic Books. ISBN   9780465021475.
  20. ↑ Heidegger, Martin (2008) [1962]. Being and Time. New York: Harper and Row.
  21. ↑ Burns, David D. (1999) [1980]. Feeling Good: The New Mood Therapy (Revised and updated ed.). New York: Avon. ISBN   9780380810338. OCLC   42712412.
  22. ↑ Bruno, Frank Joe (1993). Psychological Symptoms. New York: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   047155281X. OCLC   26353314.
  23. ↑ Goodheart, C. D. (2006). Evidence-based Psychotherapy: Where Practice and Research Meet. Washington D. C.: American Psychological Association.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.