Missile Defense Agency

Last updated
Missile Defense Agency
Seal of the U.S. Missile Defense Agency.svg
Agency overview
FormedJanuary 2002;22 years ago (2002-01)
Preceding agencies
Jurisdiction Federal government of the United States
HeadquartersHeadquarters Command Center, Fort Belvoir, Virginia [1]
EmployeesApprox. 2500 (3000 with non-MDA support personnel) (2016) [2]
Annual budget$9.187 billion (FY 2021) [3]
Agency executives
Parent agency Department of Defense
Website www.mda.mil

The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) is a component of the United States government's Department of Defense responsible for developing a comprehensive defense against ballistic missiles. It had its origins in the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) which was established in 1983 by Ronald Reagan and which was headed by Lt. General James Alan Abrahamson. Under the Strategic Defense Initiative's Innovative Sciences and Technology Office [5] [6] [7] headed by physicist and engineer Dr. James Ionson, [8] [9] [10] [11] the investment was predominantly made in basic research at national laboratories, universities, and in industry. These programs have continued to be key sources of funding for top research scientists in the fields of high-energy physics, advanced materials, nuclear research, supercomputing/computation, and many other critical science and engineering disciplines—funding which indirectly supports other research work by top scientists, and which was most politically viable to fund from appropriations for national defense. [12] It was renamed the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization in 1993, and then renamed the Missile Defense Agency in 2002. [13] The current director is Lieutenant General Heath A. Collins. [14]

Contents

Rapid changes in the strategic environment due to the rapid dissolution of the Soviet Union led, in 1993, to Bill Clinton focusing on theater ballistic missiles and similar threats, and renaming it the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization, BMDO. With another change to a more global focus made by George W. Bush, in 2002 the organization became the Missile Defense Agency.

The Missile Defense Agency is partially or wholly responsible for the development of several ballistic missile defense (BMD) systems, including the Patriot PAC-3, Aegis BMD, THAAD and the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system with a cost of $246 billion. [15] They also led the development of numerous other projects, including the Multiple Kill Vehicle and the newer Multi-Object Kill Vehicle, the Kinetic Energy Interceptor and the Airborne Laser. As the inheritor of the SDI and BMDO work, the MDA continues to fund fundamental research in high-energy physics, supercomputing/computation, advanced materials, and many other science and engineering disciplines. [12]

Mission statement

THAAD Anti-ballistic missile launcher THAAD Launcher.jpg
THAAD Anti-ballistic missile launcher

The MDA currently publishes the following mission statement:

"The Missile Defense Agency's (MDA) mission is to develop and deploy a layered Missile Defense System to defend the United States, its deployed forces, allies, and friends from missile attacks in all phases of flight." [16]

The National Defense Authorization Act is cited as the original source of the MDA's mission:

"It is the policy of the United States to maintain and improve an effective, robust layered missile defense system capable of defending the territory of the United States, allies, deployed forces, and capabilities against the developing and increasingly complex ballistic missile threat with funding subject to the annual authorization of appropriations and the annual appropriation of funds for National Missile Defense. National Defense Authorization Act (Public Law 114–328)" [16]

International mission

Arrow 3 is an exoatmospheric hypersonic anti-ballistic missile, jointly funded, developed and produced by Israel and the United States. Arrow-3 Jan-03-2013 (c).jpg
Arrow 3 is an exoatmospheric hypersonic anti-ballistic missile, jointly funded, developed and produced by Israel and the United States.

Ballistic Missile Defense Systems (BMDS) must be capable of operating in different regions of the world to ensure the success of the MDA mission. The International Strategy was approved by the MDA Director in 2007. The general strategy for international efforts is: [17]

Outreach: Communicate the importance of missile defense by promoting worldwide BMDS by sharing information with allies and partners.
Capability and Interoperability: Identify and integrate U.S and partner systems to create global missile defense system. Promote interoperability among allies.
Technology: Identify and evaluate possible international technology in support of BMDS capabilities.
Investment: Identify and execute investment opportunities with allies and partners.
Workforce: Shape a qualified workforce to execute the MDA International Strategy.

As of 2017 MDA was working on facilities in Germany, Romania, Poland, Japan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. [18]

Potential threats against the United States

Ballistic missile systems using advanced liquid- or solid-propellant propulsion are becoming more mobile, accurate and capable of striking targets over longer distances and are proliferating worldwide. [19] :pp.18–19/61

Defense of Guam

MDA will be using multiple technologies to defend Guam. [31] [32] [33] [34]

Categories

MIM-104 Patriot surface-to-air missile (SAM) with anti-ballistic missile capabilities. Patriot missile launch b.jpg
MIM-104 Patriot surface-to-air missile (SAM) with anti-ballistic missile capabilities.

MDA divides its systems into four phases: boost; ascent; mid-course; and terminal. Each of these corresponds to a different phase of the threat ballistic missile flight regime. Each phase offers different advantages and disadvantages to a missile defense system (see missile defense classified by trajectory phase), and the geography of each defended area dictates the types of systems which can be employed. The resultant flexible and layered defense approach concept is believed to improve overall defense effectiveness. The more opportunities a system has to neutralize a threat (e.g., by shooting down a missile), the better the chance of success.[ citation needed ]

Activities have also been categorized as fulfilling the goals of one of five "blocks". For example, "block 4.0" was stated as "Defend Allies and Deployed Forces in Europe from Limited Iranian Long-Range Threats and Expand Protection of U.S. Homeland". It included the US missile defense complex in Poland to be constructed, and the European Mid-course Radar (EMR), currently located at the Ronald Reagan Ballistic Missile Defense Test Site at Kwajalein Atoll, which was to have been modified and relocated to the Czech Republic. [35] [36]

On 17 September 2009, the Obama administration scrapped the "block 4.0" plan, in favor of a new so-called "European Phased Adaptive Approach" (EPAA). [37]

Boost phase

Can intercept all ranges of missiles, but the missile boost phase is only from one to five minutes. It is the best time to track the missile because it is bright and hot. The missile defense interceptors and sensors must be in close proximity to the launch, which is not always possible. This is the most desirable interception phase because it destroys the missile early in flight at its most vulnerable point and the debris will typically fall on the launching nations' territory.

Ascent phase

This is the phase after powered flight but before the apogee. It is significantly less challenging than boost phase intercepts, less costly, minimizes the potential impact of debris, and reduces the number of interceptors required to defeat a raid of missiles.

Midcourse phase

This phase begins after the booster burns out and begins coasting in space. This can last as long as 20 minutes. Any debris remaining will burn up as it enters the atmosphere. Ground-based missile defense systems can defend from long-range and intermediate-range ballistic missiles in this phase. Mobile elements can defend against medium and short ranged missiles in midcourse.

Terminal phase

This phase is the last chance to intercept the warhead. This contains the least-desirable Interception Point (IP) because there is little room for error and the interception will probably occur close to the defended target. [17]

Defenses

Boost phase defense

Research and development:

One can distinguish disabling the warheads and just disabling the boosting capability. The latter has the risk of "shortfall": damage in countries between the launch site and the target location.

See also APS report.

Ascent phase defense

Research and development:

Midcourse (ballistic) phase defense

In use:

Research and development:

Hypersonic glide phase defense

Research and development:

This section included material from United States Army Futures Command

By 2021, the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) realized that it almost had a countermeasure to hypersonic boost-glide weapons, by using existing data on the adversary hypersonic systems which were gathered from existing US satellite and ground-based sensors. [44] MDA then fed this data into its existing systems models, and concluded that the adversary hypersonic weapon's glide phase offered the best chance for MDA to intercept it. [45] MDA next proffered a request for information (RFI) from the defense community for building interceptors (denoted the GPI —glide phase interceptor) against the glide phase of that hypersonic weapon. [45] GPIs would be guided by Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensors (HBTSS). [46] [47] These GPI interceptors could first be offered to the Navy for Aegis to intercept using the C2BMC, [48] and later to the Army for THAAD to intercept using IBCS. [45] [49] By 2024, a first test of the hypersonic tracking sensors was imminent. [50]

Terminal phase defense

In use:

Research and development:

List of directors

No.DirectorTermService branch
PortraitNameTook officeLeft officeDuration
Director, Strategic Defense Initiative Organization
1
James Alan Abrahamson.jpg
Abrahamson, James Alan Lieutenant General
James A. Abrahamson
(born 1933)
March 27, 1984January 31, 19894 years, 310 days U.S. Air Force service mark.svg
U.S. Air Force
2
Portrait of US Air Force Lieutenant General George L. Monahan Jr. (2).jpg
Monahan, George Lennox Jr.Lieutenant General
George L. Monahan Jr.
(born 1933)
February 1, 1989June 30, 19901 year, 149 days U.S. Air Force service mark.svg
U.S. Air Force
3
Portrait of DoD Ambassador Henry F. Cooper, Director, Strategic Defense Initiative Organization. (U.S Army photo by Mr. Russell F. Roederer) (Released) (PC-191721).jpg
Cooper, Henry F. Ambassador
Henry F. Cooper
(born 1936)
July 10, 1990January 20, 19932 years, 194 days Flag of a United States Foreign Service Officer.svg
U.S. Foreign
Service
Director, Ballistic Missile Defense Organization
4
Portrait of U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Malcolm R. O'Neill.jpg
O'Neill, Malcolm RossLieutenant General
Malcolm R. O'Neill
(born 1940)
November 22, 1993August 1, 19962 years, 253 days Military service mark of the United States Army.svg
U.S. Army
5
Lt Gen Lester L. Lyles.jpg
Lyles, Lester L.Lieutenant General
Lester L. Lyles
(born 1946)
August 1, 1996May 28, 19992 years, 300 days U.S. Air Force service mark.svg
U.S. Air Force
6
Ron Kadish.JPG
Kadish, Ronald T.Lieutenant General
Ronald T. Kadish
(born 1948)
June 14, 1999January 2, 20022 years, 202 days U.S. Air Force service mark.svg
U.S. Air Force
Director, Missile Defense Agency
6
Ron Kadish.JPG
Kadish, Ronald T.Lieutenant General
Ronald T. Kadish
(born 1948)
January 2, 2002July 2, 20042 years, 182 days U.S. Air Force service mark.svg
U.S. Air Force
7
Defense.gov News Photo 040827-F-0000X-001.jpg
Obering, Henry Anthony IIILieutenant General
Henry A. Obering III
(born c.1954)
July 2, 2004November 21, 20084 years, 142 days U.S. Air Force service mark.svg
U.S. Air Force
8
Lt. Gen. Patrick J. O'Reilly (2).jpg
O'Reilly, Patrick J.Lieutenant General
Patrick J. O'Reilly
(born c.1959)
November 21, 2008November 19, 20123 years, 364 days Military service mark of the United States Army.svg
U.S. Army
9
VICE ADMIRAL JAMES D. SYRING.jpg
Syring, James D. Vice Admiral
James D. Syring
(born 1963)
November 19, 2012June 16, 20174 years, 209 days Emblem of the United States Navy.svg
U.S. Navy
10
LIEUTENANT GENERAL SAMUEL A. GREAVES.JPG
Greaves, Samuel A.Lieutenant General
Samuel A. Greaves
(born c.1963)
June 26, 2017May 31, 20191 year, 339 days U.S. Air Force service mark.svg
U.S. Air Force
11
Vice Adm. Jon A. Hill.jpg
Hill, Jon AnthonyVice Admiral
Jon A. Hill
(born 1963)
May 31, 2019July 31, 20234 years, 61 days Emblem of the United States Navy.svg
U.S. Navy
-
Douglas L. Williams (2).jpg
Williams, Douglas L.Rear Admiral (lower half)
Douglas L. Williams
Acting
August 1, 2023December 5, 2023126 days Emblem of the United States Navy.svg
U.S. Navy
12
Lt Gen Heath A. Collins.jpg
Collins, HeathLieutenant General
Heath A. Collins
(born c.1971)
December 5, 2023Incumbent360 days U.S. Air Force service mark.svg
U.S. Air Force

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-ballistic missile</span> Surface-to-air missile designed to counter ballistic missiles

An anti-ballistic missile (ABM) is a surface-to-air missile designed to counter ballistic missiles. Ballistic missiles are used to deliver nuclear, chemical, biological, or conventional warheads in a ballistic flight trajectory. The term "anti-ballistic missile" is a generic term for a system designed to intercept and destroy any type of ballistic threat; however, it is commonly used for systems specifically designed to counter intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Strategic Defense Initiative</span> U.S. military defense program (1984–1993)

The Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), derisively nicknamed the Star Wars program, was a proposed missile defense system intended to protect the United States from attack by ballistic nuclear missiles. The program was announced in 1983, by President Ronald Reagan. Reagan called for a system that would render nuclear weapons obsolete, and to end the doctrine of mutual assured destruction (MAD), which he described as a "suicide pact". Elements of the program reemerged in 2019 under the Space Development Agency (SDA).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aegis Combat System</span> American integrated naval weapons system developed by RCA and produced by Lockheed Martin

The Aegis Combat System is an American integrated naval weapons system, which uses computers and radars to track and guide weapons to destroy enemy targets. It was developed by the Missile and Surface Radar Division of RCA, and it is now produced by Lockheed Martin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System</span> United States Navy and Missile Defense Agency anti-ballistic missile program

The Aegis ballistic missile defense system, also known as Sea-Based Midcourse, is a Missile Defense Agency program under the United States Department of Defense developed to provide missile defense against short and intermediate-range ballistic missiles. The program is part of the United States national missile defense strategy and European NATO missile defense system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States national missile defense</span> Nationwide missile defense program of the United States

National missile defense (NMD) refers to the nationwide antimissile program the United States has had under development since the 1990s. After the renaming in 2002, the term now refers to the entire program, not just the ground-based interceptors and associated facilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ground-Based Midcourse Defense</span> United States anti-ballistic missile defense for intercepting warheads in space

Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD), previously National Missile Defense (NMD), is an anti-ballistic missile system implemented by the United States of America for defense against ballistic missiles, during the midcourse phase of ballistic trajectory flight. It is a major component of the American missile defense strategy to counter ballistic missiles, including intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) carrying nuclear, chemical, biological or conventional warheads.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Terminal High Altitude Area Defense</span> US ballistic missile defense system

Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), formerly Theater High Altitude Area Defense, is an American anti-ballistic missile defense system designed to intercept and destroy short-, medium-, and intermediate-range ballistic missiles in their terminal phase. The THAAD interceptor carries no warhead, instead relying on its kinetic energy of impact to destroy the incoming missile. THAAD was developed after the experience of Iraq's Scud missile attacks during the Gulf War in 1991.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Missile defense</span> System that destroys attacking missiles

Missile defense is a system, weapon, or technology involved in the detection, tracking, interception, and also the destruction of attacking missiles. Conceived as a defense against nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), its application has broadened to include shorter-ranged non-nuclear tactical and theater missiles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cobra Dane</span> US radar installation for monitoring Soviet missile tests

The AN/FPS-108 COBRA DANE is a PESA phased array radar installation operated by Raytheon for the United States Space Force at Eareckson Air Station on the island of Shemya, Aleutian Islands, Alaska. The system was built in 1976 and brought online in 1977 for the primary mission of gathering intelligence about Russia's ICBM program in support of verification of the SALT II arms limitation treaty. Its single face 29 m (95 ft) diameter phased array radar antenna 52.7373°N 174.0914°E faces the Kamchatka Peninsula and Russia's Kura Test Range. COBRA DANE operates in the 1215–1400 MHz band and can track items as small as a basketball sized drone at distances of several hundred miles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sea-based X-band radar</span> Part of US ballistic missile defense system

The Sea-Based X-band radar (SBX-1) is a floating, self-propelled, mobile active electronically scanned array early-warning radar station designed to operate in high winds and heavy seas. It was developed as part of the United States Department of Defense Missile Defense Agency's (MDA) Ballistic Missile Defense System.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">RIM-161 Standard Missile 3</span> Kinetic surface-to-air missile (Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System)

The RIM-161 Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) is a ship-based surface-to-air missile used by the United States Navy to intercept short- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles as a part of Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System. Although primarily designed as an anti-ballistic missile, the SM-3 has also been employed in an anti-satellite capacity against a satellite at the lower end of low Earth orbit. The SM-3 is primarily used and tested by the United States Navy and also operated by the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">RIM-174 Standard ERAM</span> US surface-to-air missile

The RIM-174 Standard Extended Range Active Missile (ERAM), or Standard Missile 6 (SM-6), is a missile in current production for the United States Navy (USN). It was designed for extended-range anti-air warfare (ER-AAW) purposes, providing capability against fixed and rotary-wing aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles, anti-ship cruise missiles in flight, both over sea and land, and terminal ballistic missile defense. It can also be used as a high-speed anti-ship missile. The missile uses the airframe of the earlier SM-2ER Block IV (RIM-156A) missile, adding the active radar homing seeker from the AIM-120C AMRAAM in place of the semi‑active seeker of the previous design. This will improve the capability of the Standard missile against highly agile targets and targets beyond the effective range of the launching vessels' target illumination radars. Initial operating capability was planned for 2013 and was achieved on 27 November 2013. The SM-6 is not meant to replace the SM-2 series of missiles but will serve alongside and provide extended range and increased firepower. It was approved for export in January 2017. An air-to-air variant of the SM-6, known as the AIM-174, is the first dedicated long-range air-to-air missile employed by the USN since the 2004 retirement of the AIM-54 Phoenix. SM-6 can also be fired from the U.S. Army's Typhon missile launcher as part of the Strategic Mid-range Fires System (SMRF).

The Space Tracking and Surveillance System was a pair of satellites developed by the United States Missile Defense Agency (MDA) to research the space-based detection and tracking of ballistic missiles. Data from STSS satellites could allow interceptors to engage incoming missiles earlier in flight than would be possible with other missile detection systems. The STSS program began in 2001, when the "SBIRS Low" program was transferred to MDA from the United States Air Force. In December 2002, SBIRS Low Research & Development was renamed Space Tracking and Surveillance System (STSS).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NATO missile defense system</span>

The NATO missile defense system is a missile defense system being constructed by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in several member states and around the Mediterranean Sea. Plans for this system have changed several times since first studied in 2002, including as a response to Russian opposition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Missile defense systems by country</span>

Missile defense systems are a type of missile defense intended to shield a country against incoming missiles, such as intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) or other ballistic missiles. The United States, Russia, India, France, Israel, Italy, United Kingdom, China and Iran have all developed missile defense systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ground-Based Interceptor</span> Anti-ballistic missile

The Ground-Based Interceptor (GBI) is the anti-ballistic missile component of the United States' Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">AN/TPY-2 transportable radar</span> Surveillance radar

The AN/TPY-2 Surveillance Transportable Radar, also called the Forward Based X-Band Transportable (FBX-T) is a long-range, very high-altitude active digital antenna array X band surveillance radar designed to add a tier to existing missile and air defence systems. It has a range of 2,900 mi. Made by Raytheon, it is the primary radar for the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) missile system, but also cues the AN/MPQ-53 radar of the MIM-104 Patriot system. Patriot PAC-3 is a lower-altitude missile and air defense system than THAAD.

In air and missile defense (AMD), the Integrated Air-and-Missile Defense system (IAMD) is an SMDC research program to augment the aging surface-to-air missile defense systems and to provide the United States Army with a low-cost, but effective complement to kinetic energy solutions to take out air threats. Brigade level higher energy lasers are used in truck mounted systems called HELMTT. At lower levels, the Army needs to develop interceptors that don't cost more than small, unmanned aircraft systems. In early research they have successfully used 5-kilowatt lasers on a Stryker combat vehicle. The Mobile Expeditionary High-Energy Laser (MEHEL) was used at MFIX at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, in the first half of April, 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System</span> Network in the US Army

The United States Army Integrated Air and Missile Defense [IAMD] Battle Command System (IBCS) is a plug-and-fight network intended to let a radar or any other defensive sensor feed its data to any available weapon—colloquially, "connect any sensor to any shooter". The IBCS is designed to link radars across thousands of miles and shoot down short-, medium-, and intermediate-range ballistic missiles in their terminal phase.

This is a table of the most widespread or notable anti-ballistic missile (ABM) systems, intended in whole or part, to counter ballistic missiles. Since many systems have developed in stages or have many iterations or upgrades, only the most notable versions are described. Such systems are typically highly integrated with radar and guidance systems, so the emphasis is chiefly on system capability rather than the specific missile employed. For example, David's Sling is a system that employs the Stunner missile.

References

  1. "MDA Breaks Ground on New Headquarters Facility" (PDF).
  2. Missile Defense Agency Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act (NoFEAR) Fiscal Year 2016 Report (PDF) (Report). Missile Defense Agency. 2016. p. 1. Retrieved July 11, 2021.
  3. Missile Defense Agency Budget Estimates Overview Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 (PDF) (Report). Missile Defense Agency. 2020. pp. 1, 15. Retrieved July 11, 2021.
  4. "MDA Leadership". mda.mil. Missile Defense Agency. Retrieved July 11, 2021.
  5. "SDIO Funds Research". MIT: The Tech. November 5, 1985. Archived from the original on August 8, 2012. Retrieved May 25, 2018.
  6. "Special Presentation: Innovative Science and Technology Programs". SPIE – Digital Library. June 3, 1988. doi:10.1117/12.947548.
  7. "Star War's Inc". Inc. Magazine. April 1987.
  8. Goodwin, Irwin (June 1988). "Washington's Ins & Outs: Ionson and Mense Leave SDIO". Physics Today. 41 (6): 53. Bibcode:1988PhT....41f..53G. doi:10.1063/1.2811448.
  9. "Low Profile for SDI Work on Campus". The Scientist Magazine. May 1988.
  10. "Ionson Counters SDI Dispute". MIT: The Tech. November 1985. Archived from the original on 2012-08-08. Retrieved 2018-05-25.
  11. "Ionson Defends SDI Program". MIT: The Tech. October 1985. Archived from the original on 2012-06-16. Retrieved 2018-05-25.
  12. 1 2 85-25: National Policy on Transfer of Scientific, Technical and Engineering Information, Security Innovation for Estate Protection
  13. "MDA History". mda.mil. January 23, 2019. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
  14. "Lieutenant General Heath A. Collins is confirmed as the Director, Missile Defense Agency". www.mda.mil (Press release). Fort Belvoir, Virginia: Missile Defense Agency. December 5, 2023. Retrieved October 18, 2024.
  15. Sherman, Jason (2024-11-01). "MDA pegs cost of Missile Defense System at $246B, prioritizes SM-3 Bk IIA over IB". Inside Defense. Retrieved 2024-11-01.
  16. 1 2 MDA (2019). Our Mission. Retrieved on 2019-12-21 from https://www.mda.mil/about/mission.html.
  17. 1 2 "Testing: Building Confidence" (PDF). Missile Defense Agency. 2009. Retrieved 2009-12-23.[ permanent dead link ]
  18. "New US Missile Defence Agency Bases To Be Constructed Around World". www.defenseworld.net. Digitalwriters Media Pvt. Ltd. 24 May 2017. Retrieved 25 May 2017.
  19. 1 2 "Ballistic Missile Defense Review, 26 Jan 2010" (PDF). defense.gov. 26 January 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 March 2021. Retrieved 22 December 2018.
  20. "Iran tests longest range missiles". BBC News. 2009-09-28. Retrieved 2009-12-23.
  21. Hildreth, Steven A. (2008-07-21). "Iran's Ballistic Missile Programs: An Overview". Congressional Research Service. Retrieved 2009-12-23.
  22. "U.S. says Iran rocket test breaches U.N. resolution". yahoo.com. 27 July 2017. Retrieved 10 April 2018.
  23. Motamedi, Maziar. "Iran has a hypersonic missile. What does that mean?". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 2023-12-03.
  24. "North Korea's missile programme". BBC News. 2009-05-27. Retrieved 2009-12-23.
  25. "The 100th Missile Defense Brigade: A decade of transformation and mission success". army.mil. Retrieved 10 April 2018.
  26. On North Korea’s failed Musudan launch Archived 2018-11-06 at the Wayback Machine accessdate=2016-06-03
  27. PM Abe: North Korea launched four ballistic missiles .nytimes.com/2017/01/01/world/asia/north-korea-intercontinental-ballistic-missile-test-kim-jong-un.html Choe Sang-Hun, (1 Jan 2017) "North Korea Will Test Intercontinental Ballistic Missile, Kim Says" New York Times [ permanent dead link ]
  28. PM Abe: North Korea launched four ballistic missiles [ dead link ] accessdate=2017-03-05
  29. Washington Post North Korea launches another missile, perhaps one that can reach U.S. accessdate=2017-03-05
  30. Barbara Starr and Ryan Browne (4 July 2017). "As US, SK drill, Tillerson seeks action on NK". CNN. Retrieved 2017-07-06.
  31. Ashley Roque (16 March 2023) Missile Defense Agency details evolving, ‘incremental’ vision for Guam air defenses C2BMC; IBCS; LRDR, AN/TPY-6, LTAMDS, Sentinel Radars; Aegis Ashore in trailers, THAAD, IFPC Inc 2 using AIM-9X Sidewinder +2nd missile TBD;
  32. DoD (14 Mar 2023) Missile Defense Agency Officials Hold a Press Briefing on President Biden's Fiscal 2024 Missile Defense Budget
  33. Colin Demarest (28 Mar 2023) Electronic warfare is 'new frontier' for US Missile Defense Agency [ permanent dead link ] PPBE FY24: $10.9 billion; FY23: $9.6 billion; FY22: $8.9 billion
  34. Micah Hanks (3 Apr 2023) BREAKTHROUGH BALLISTIC MISSILE INTERCEPT DEMONSTRATED BY U.S. MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY IN AEGIS SYSTEM TEST FTM-31Ea "first Aegis Baseline 9 Weapon System (9.C2.0, or BMD 5.1) intercept of a medium-range ballistic missile with the upgraded SM-6 Dual" salvo of Standard Missile-6 Dual IIs, also called 'RIM-174 Standard Extended Range Active Missile' ERAM
  35. "Ballistic Missile Defense System". GlobalSecurity. Retrieved 2008-11-07.
  36. G. Lewis and T. Postol (May–June 2008). "The European missile defense folly". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists . 64 (2): 33. Bibcode:2008BuAtS..64b..32L. doi:10.2968/064002009.
  37. "United States European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) and NATO Missile Defense". U.S. Department of State. 2011-05-03. Retrieved 2013-07-05.
  38. "Kinetic Energy Interceptors Program Element 0603886C Budget Item Justification" (PDF). May 2009.
  39. Airborne Laser (ABL) 2010 Archived 2010-01-28 at the Wayback Machine . US Missile Defense Agency, January 10, 2010. Retrieved: January 25, 2010.
  40. "U.S. successfully tests airborne laser on missile". Reuters. Feb 12, 2010.
  41. "Boeing YAL-1 Airborne Laser impacted by Pentagon spending priorities". Flight Image of the Day. Archived from the original on October 20, 2013.
  42. "Raytheon Awarded $10 million to Develop New Missile Defense Interceptor". Raytheon. Sep 18, 2008.
  43. "President's Budget Submission for Program Element 0603894C" (PDF). Apr 27, 2009.
  44. McLeary, Paul (18 Dec 2019). "MDA Kickstarts New Way To Kill Hypersonic Missiles". HBTSS is 'Space sensor layer'
  45. 1 2 3 Judson, Jen (13 Aug 2021). "Missile Defense Agency dials up the speed in quest for hypersonic interceptor".
  46. Dolan, John L.; Gallagher, Richard K.; Mann, David L. (23 April 2019). "Hypersonic Weapons – A Threat to National Security". Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensor (HBTSS)
  47. Hitchens, Theresa (24 February 2020). "2021 Budget Will Finally Fully Fund Next-Gen OPIR, Says Roper". Space-Based Infrared System (SBIRS) replacement: three satellites in Geosynchronous Orbit (GEO) and two satellites in a polar orbit
  48. Judson, Jen (20 Nov 2021). "Here are the three companies selected to design hypersonic missile interceptors for MDA".
  49. Hitchens, Theresa (12 Aug 2021). "Next Budget Will Limit Glide Phase Interceptor Contractors: MDA Head". 2028 target date is being accelerated. FY2022 decisions on GPI/Ground-Based Interceptor, GBI replacement (the Next generation interceptor NGI) will be made by Deputy Secretary Kathleen Hicks.
  50. Hitchens, Theresa (6 Jun 2024). "First test of space-based hypersonic tracking sensors 'within a week', MDA director says".