Ough (orthography)

Last updated

Ough is a four-letter sequence, a tetragraph, used in English orthography and notorious for its unpredictable pronunciation. [1] It has at least eight pronunciations in North American English and nine in British English, and no discernible patterns exist for choosing among them. [1]

Contents

History

In Middle English, ough was regularly pronounced with a back rounded vowel and a velar fricative (e.g., [oːx] , [oːɣ] , [uːx] or [uːɣ] ).[ citation needed ]

List of pronunciations

Pronunciation ExamplesNote
/ʌf/ Brough, chough, clough, enough, Hough, rough, shough, slough (see below), sough, toughRhymes with puff, stuff. Clough and sough are also pronounced // .
/ɒf/ or /ɔːf/ cough, Gough, troughRhymes with off, scoff. Trough is pronounced /trɔːθ/ (troth) by some speakers of American English, and a baker's trough is also pronounced /tr/ in that variety. [2]
// bough, clough, doughty, drought, plough, slough (see below), Slough, soughRhymes with cow, how. Clough and sough are also pronounced /ʌf/ . Plough is generally spelled plow in American English.
// although, brougham, dough, furlough, Ough, thoughRhymes with no, toe. Brougham is also pronounced // .
/ɔː/ abought, besought, bought, brought, fought, nought, ought, sought, thought, wroughtRhymes with caught, taught. Regularly so used before /t/ , except in doughty /ˈdti/ and drought /drt/ . Realized as /ɒ/ or /ɑː/ in dialects exhibiting the cot-caught merger.
// brougham, slough (see below), throughRhymes with true, woo. Brougham is also pronounced // .
/ə/ borough, Poughkeepsie, thorough, Willoughby, yarboroughPronounced // when at the end of a word in American English (borough and thorough thus rhyme with burrow and furrow), but reduced to /ə/ when followed by another syllable in many dialects (such as in thoroughly).
/ʌp/ , /əp/ hiccoughVariant spelling of the more common hiccup.
/əf/ Greenough Pronounced /ˈɡrɛnəf/ as the name of a river in Western Australia, and usually pronounced /ˈɡrn/ as a surname.
/ɒk/ houghRhymes with dock, lock. More commonly spelled hock from the 20th century onwards.
/ɒx/ Brough, Clough, lough, turloughRhymes with Scots loch. Many speakers substitute /k/ for /x/ .

Slough has three pronunciations, depending on its meaning:

The town of Slough in the Thames Valley of England is /sl/ .

An example sentence using the nine pronunciations commonly found in modern usage (and excluding hough, which is now a rarely used spelling) is, "The wind was rough along the lough as the ploughman fought through the snow, and though he hiccoughed and coughed, his work was thorough."

Another, slightly shorter example would be, "The rough, dough-faced ploughman fought through the borough to the lough, hiccoughing and coughing."

Other pronunciations can be found in proper nouns, many of which are of Celtic origin (Irish, Scottish or Welsh) rather than English. For example, ough can represent /ɒk/ in the surname Coughlin, /j/ in Ayscough, [4] and /i/ in the name Colcolough ( /ˈkkli/ ) in the United States. [5]

The two occurrences of ough in the English place name Loughborough are pronounced differently, resulting in /ˈlʌfbərə/ . [6] Additionally, three parishes of Milton KeynesWoughton /ˈwʊftən/ , Loughton /ˈltən/ and Broughton /ˈbrɔːtən/ — have different pronunciations of the combination. [7] [8]

Tough, though, through and thorough are formed by adding another letter each time, yet none of them rhyme (in American English, however, though and thorough both have // ).

Some humorous verse has been written to illustrate this seeming incongruity:

Spelling reforms

Because of the unpredictability of the combination, many English spelling reformers have proposed replacing it with more phonetic combinations, some of which have caught on in varying degrees of formal and informal success. Generally, spelling reforms have been more widely accepted in the United States and less so in other English-speaking areas. One problem is that a pronunciation with the velar fricative is still found locally in parts of North-East Scotland, where, for example, trough is pronounced /trɔːx/ .[ citation needed ]

In 18th century British English, before the cheap Penny Post and while paper was taxed, the combination ough was occasionally shortened to ô when the gh was not pronounced, to save space: thô for though, thorô for thorough, and brôt for brought.[ citation needed ]

In April 1984, at its yearly meeting, the Simplified Spelling Society adopted the following reform as its house style: [14] [15]

Notes and references

    1. 1 2 Adam Brown, Understanding and Teaching English Spelling: A Strategic Guide, 2018, ISBN   1138082678, p. 214
    2. "Definition of Trough by Merriam-Webster". merriam-webster.com. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 16 September 2017.
    3. "Definition of Slough by Merriam-Webster". merriam-webster.com. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 31 January 2024.
    4. Jones, Daniel (2011). Roach, Peter; Setter, Jane; Esling, John (eds.). Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary (18th ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-15255-6.
    5. Bolton, H. Carrington (1891). "The Pronunciation of Folk-Names in South Carolina". The Journal of American Folklore. 4 (14): 270–272. doi:10.2307/534017. JSTOR   534017.
    6. Sinclair, J.M., ed. (1999). Collins Concise Dictionary (4th ed.). Glasgow: HarperCollins. p. 867. ISBN   0 00 472257 4.
    7. Morice, Dave (2005). "Kickshaws". Butler University. p. 228. Archived from the original on 1 November 2018. Retrieved 4 March 2019.
    8. Murrer, Sally (13 June 2022). "The 6 most mispronounced Milton Keynes place names people are always getting wrong". Milton Keynes Citizen. Retrieved 14 June 2022.
    9. "A Variable Symbol". Punch, or the London Charivari . 68. 16 January 1875.
    10. O-U-G-H
    11. Ough, a Phonetic Fantasy
    12. Watt, T. S. (21 June 1954). "Brush Up Your English: [Hints on Pronunciation for Visiting Foreigners]". The Manchester Guardian . p. 3. Archived from the original on 21 March 2023. Retrieved 19 September 2024 via Newspapers.com.The author appears as T. S. W. in the source. The square brackets in the subtitle are in the source, the colon is not.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
    13. Roberts, Alan (28 March 2004). ""ough" poem". Archived from the original on 2017-08-27. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
    14. "The Society's 1984 Proposals". Journal of the Simplified Spelling Society (February 1988).
    15. "Tough Though Thought – and we call it correct spelling!" Archived 2011-04-16 at the Wayback Machine . Simplified Spelling Society (1984).

    Related Research Articles

    English orthography comprises the set of rules used when writing the English language, allowing readers and writers to associate written graphemes with the sounds of spoken English, as well as other features of the language. English's orthography includes norms for spelling, hyphenation, capitalisation, word breaks, emphasis, and punctuation.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">W</span> 23rd letter of the Latin alphabet

    W, or w, is the twenty-third letter of the Latin alphabet, used in the modern English alphabet, the alphabets of other western European languages and others worldwide. Its name in English is double-u, plural double-ues.

    The phonology of the open back vowels of the English language has undergone changes both overall and with regional variations, through Old and Middle English to the present. The sounds heard in modern English were significantly influenced by the Great Vowel Shift, as well as more recent developments in some dialects such as the cot–caught merger.

    In linguistics, vowel length is the perceived length of a vowel sound: the corresponding physical measurement is duration. In some languages vowel length is an important phonemic factor, meaning vowel length can change the meaning of the word, for example in Arabic, Czech, Dravidian languages, some Finno-Ugric languages, Japanese, Kyrgyz, Samoan, and Xhosa. Some languages in the past likely had the distinction even though their descendants do not, with an example being Latin and its descendent Romance languages.

    In the phonology of the Romanian language, the phoneme inventory consists of seven vowels, two or four semivowels, and twenty consonants. In addition, as with other languages, other phonemes can occur occasionally in interjections or recent borrowings.

    Stress is a prominent feature of the English language, both at the level of the word (lexical stress) and at the level of the phrase or sentence (prosodic stress). Absence of stress on a syllable, or on a word in some cases, is frequently associated in English with vowel reduction – many such syllables are pronounced with a centralized vowel (schwa) or with certain other vowels that are described as being "reduced". Various contradictory phonological analyses exist for these phenomena.

    In an alphabetic writing system, a silent letter is a letter that, in a particular word, does not correspond to any sound in the word's pronunciation. In linguistics, a silent letter is often symbolised with a null sign U+2205EMPTY SET, which resembles the Scandinavian letter Ø. A null or zero is an unpronounced or unwritten segment.

    In English orthography, many words feature a silent ⟨e⟩, most commonly at the end of a word or morpheme. Typically it represents a vowel sound that was formerly pronounced, but became silent in late Middle English or Early Modern English.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">American and British English spelling differences</span>

    Despite the various English dialects spoken from country to country and within different regions of the same country, there are only slight regional variations in English orthography, the two most notable variations being British and American spelling. Many of the differences between American and British or Commonwealth English date back to a time before spelling standards were developed. For instance, some spellings seen as "American" today were once commonly used in Britain, and some spellings seen as "British" were once commonly used in the United States.

    In linguistics, prothesis, or less commonly prosthesis is the addition of a sound or syllable at the beginning of a word without changing the word's meaning or the rest of its structure. A vowel or consonant added by prothesis is called prothetic or less commonly prosthetic.

    Spelling Reform 1 or Spelling Reform step 1 is an English spelling reform proposal advocated by British/Australian linguist Harry Lindgren. It calls for the short sound to always be spelt with E. For example, friend would become frend and head would become hed. SR1 was part of a 50-stage reform that Lindgren advocated in his book Spelling Reform: A New Approach (1969).

    In phonetics and phonology, checked vowels are those that commonly stand in a stressed closed syllable, while free vowels are those that can stand in either a stressed closed syllable or a stressed open syllable.


    In the Latin-based orthographies of many European languages, including English, a distinction between hard and soft ⟨c⟩ occurs in which ⟨c⟩ represents two distinct phonemes. The sound of a hard ⟨c⟩ often precedes the non-front vowels ⟨a⟩, ⟨o⟩ and ⟨u⟩, and is that of the voiceless velar stop,. The sound of a soft ⟨c⟩, typically before ⟨e⟩, ⟨i⟩ and ⟨y⟩, may be a fricative or affricate, depending on the language. In English, the sound of soft ⟨c⟩ is.

    A hyperforeignism is a type of hypercorrection where speakers identify an inaccurate pattern in loanwords from a foreign language and then apply that pattern to other loanwords. This results in a pronunciation of those loanwords which does not reflect the rules of either language. For example, the ⟨n⟩ in habanero is pronounced as in Spanish, but English speakers often pronounce it with, approximating as if it were spelled habañero. The proposed explanation is that English speakers are familiar with other Spanish loanwords like piñata and jalapeño, and incorrectly assume that all Spanish words have in place of.

    In Russian, the term spelling rule is used to describe a number of rules relating to the spelling of words in the language that would appear in most cases to deviate from a strictly phonetic transcription.

    Central Alaskan Yupʼik is one of the languages of the Yupik family, in turn a member of the Eskimo–Aleut language group, spoken in western and southwestern Alaska. Both in ethnic population and in number of speakers, the Central Alaskan Yupik people form the largest group among Alaska Natives. As of 2010 Yupʼik was, after Navajo, the second most spoken aboriginal language in the United States. Yupʼik should not be confused with the related language Central Siberian Yupik spoken in Chukotka and St. Lawrence Island, nor Naukan Yupik likewise spoken in Chukotka.

    The most thorough treatment of the Kiowa sound system is by Laurel Watkins in a generative framework. A consideration of prosodic phenomena with acoustic analysis is in Sivertsen (1956). Earlier discussions of phonemics are Trager (1960), Merrifield (1959), Wonderly et al. (1954), and Harrington (1928).

    Commonly misspelled English words are words that are often unintentionally misspelled in general writing.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Standard Canadian English</span> Variety of Canadian English

    Standard Canadian English is the largely homogeneous variety of Canadian English that is spoken particularly across Ontario and Western Canada, as well as throughout Canada among urban middle-class speakers from English-speaking families, excluding the regional dialects of Atlantic Canadian English. Canadian English has a mostly uniform phonology and much less dialectal diversity than neighbouring American English. In particular, Standard Canadian English is defined by the cot–caught merger to and an accompanying chain shift of vowel sounds, which is called the Canadian Shift. A subset of the dialect geographically at its central core, excluding British Columbia to the west and everything east of Montreal, has been called Inland Canadian English. It is further defined by both of the phenomena that are known as Canadian raising : the production of and with back starting points in the mouth and the production of with a front starting point and very little glide that is almost in the Canadian Prairies.