Tournament solution

Last updated

A tournament solution is a function that maps an oriented complete graph to a nonempty subset of its vertices. It can informally be thought of as a way to find the "best" alternatives among all of the alternatives that are "competing" against each other in the tournament. Tournament solutions originate from social choice theory, [1] [2] [3] [4] but have also been considered in sports competition, game theory, [5] multi-criteria decision analysis, biology, [6] [7] webpage ranking, [8] and dueling bandit problems. [9]

Contents

In the context of social choice theory, tournament solutions are closely related to Fishburn's C1 social choice functions, [10] and thus seek to show who are the strongest candidates in some sense.

A tournament on 4 vertices:
A
=
{
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
}
{\displaystyle A=\{1,2,3,4\}}
,
[?]=
{
(
1
,
2
)
,
(
1
,
4
)
,
(
2
,
4
)
,
{\displaystyle \succ =\{(1,2),(1,4),(2,4),}
(
3
,
1
)
,
(
3
,
2
)
,
(
4
,
3
)
}
{\displaystyle (3,1),(3,2),(4,3)\}} 4-tournament.svg
A tournament on 4 vertices: ,

Definition

A tournament graph is a tuple where is a set of vertices (called alternatives) and is a connex and asymmetric binary relation over the vertices. In social choice theory, the binary relation typically represents the pairwise majority comparison between alternatives.

A tournament solution is a function that maps each tournament to a nonempty subset of the alternatives (called the choice set [2] ) and does not distinguish between isomorphic tournaments:

If is a graph isomorphism between two tournaments and , then

Examples

Common examples of tournament solutions are the: [1] [2]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Axiom of choice</span> Axiom of set theory

In mathematics, the axiom of choice, abbreviated AC or AoC, is an axiom of set theory equivalent to the statement that a Cartesian product of a collection of non-empty sets is non-empty. Informally put, the axiom of choice says that given any collection of sets, each containing at least one element, it is possible to construct a new set by choosing one element from each set, even if the collection is infinite. Formally, it states that for every indexed family of nonempty sets, there exists an indexed set such that for every . The axiom of choice was formulated in 1904 by Ernst Zermelo in order to formalize his proof of the well-ordering theorem.

In mathematics, the Hausdorff maximal principle is an alternate and earlier formulation of Zorn's lemma proved by Felix Hausdorff in 1914. It states that in any partially ordered set, every totally ordered subset is contained in a maximal totally ordered subset, where "maximal" is with respect to set inclusion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zorn's lemma</span> Mathematical proposition equivalent to the axiom of choice

Zorn's lemma, also known as the Kuratowski–Zorn lemma, is a proposition of set theory. It states that a partially ordered set containing upper bounds for every chain necessarily contains at least one maximal element.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arrow's impossibility theorem</span> Proof all ranked voting rules have spoilers

Arrow's impossibility theorem is a key result in social choice, discovered by Kenneth Arrow, showing that no ranked voting rule can behave rationally. Specifically, any such rule violates independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA), the idea that a choice between and should not depend on the quality of a third, unrelated option . The result is most often cited in election science and voting theory, where is called a spoiler candidate. In this context, Arrow's theorem can be restated as showing that no ranked voting rule can eliminate the spoiler effect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smith set</span> Set preferred to any other by a majority

The Smith or Schwartz set, sometimes called the top-cycle, generalizes the idea of a Condorcet winner to cases where no such winner exists. It does so by allowing cycles of candidates to be treated jointly, as if they were a single Condorcet winner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hypergraph</span> Generalization of graph theory

In mathematics, a hypergraph is a generalization of a graph in which an edge can join any number of vertices. In contrast, in an ordinary graph, an edge connects exactly two vertices.

In combinatorics, a greedoid is a type of set system. It arises from the notion of the matroid, which was originally introduced by Whitney in 1935 to study planar graphs and was later used by Edmonds to characterize a class of optimization problems that can be solved by greedy algorithms. Around 1980, Korte and Lovász introduced the greedoid to further generalize this characterization of greedy algorithms; hence the name greedoid. Besides mathematical optimization, greedoids have also been connected to graph theory, language theory, order theory, and other areas of mathematics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abstract simplicial complex</span> Mathematical object

In combinatorics, an abstract simplicial complex (ASC), often called an abstract complex or just a complex, is a family of sets that is closed under taking subsets, i.e., every subset of a set in the family is also in the family. It is a purely combinatorial description of the geometric notion of a simplicial complex. For example, in a 2-dimensional simplicial complex, the sets in the family are the triangles, their edges, and their vertices.

In an election, a candidate is called a majority winner or majority-preferred candidate if more than half of all voters would support them in a one-on-one race against any one of their opponents. Voting systems where a majority winner will always win are said to satisfy the majority-rule principle, because they extend the principle of majority rule to elections with multiple candidates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radon's theorem</span> Says d+2 points in d dimensions can be partitioned into two subsets whose convex hulls intersect

In geometry, Radon's theorem on convex sets, published by Johann Radon in 1921, states that:

Any set of d + 2 points in Rd can be partitioned into two sets whose convex hulls intersect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tournament (graph theory)</span> Directed graph where each vertex pair has one arc

In graph theory, a tournament is a directed graph with exactly one edge between each two vertices, in one of the two possible directions. Equivalently, a tournament is an orientation of an undirected complete graph. The name tournament comes from interpreting the graph as the outcome of a round-robin tournament, a game where each player is paired against every other exactly once. In a tournament, the vertices represent the players, and the edges between players point from the winner to the loser.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social choice theory</span> Academic discipline

Social choice theory is a branch of welfare economics that analyzes methods of combining individual opinions, beliefs, or preferences to reach a collective decision or create measures of social well-being. It contrasts with political science in that it is a normative field that studies how societies should make decisions, whereas political science is descriptive. Social choice incorporates insights from economics, mathematics, philosophy, political science, and game theory to find the best ways to combine individual preferences into a coherent whole, called a social welfare function.

In the study of electoral systems, the uncovered set is a set of candidates that generalizes the notion of a Condorcet winner whenever there is a Condorcet paradox. The Landau set can be thought of as the Pareto frontier for a set of candidates, when the frontier is determined by pairwise victories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Graphon</span>

In graph theory and statistics, a graphon is a symmetric measurable function , that is important in the study of dense graphs. Graphons arise both as a natural notion for the limit of a sequence of dense graphs, and as the fundamental defining objects of exchangeable random graph models. Graphons are tied to dense graphs by the following pair of observations: the random graph models defined by graphons give rise to dense graphs almost surely, and, by the regularity lemma, graphons capture the structure of arbitrary large dense graphs.

In functional analysis, a branch of mathematics, a selection theorem is a theorem that guarantees the existence of a single-valued selection function from a given set-valued map. There are various selection theorems, and they are important in the theories of differential inclusions, optimal control, and mathematical economics.

In cooperative game theory and social choice theory, the Nakamura number measures the degree of rationality of preference aggregation rules, such as voting rules. It is an indicator of the extent to which an aggregation rule can yield well-defined choices.

In the mathematics of infinite graphs, an end of a graph represents, intuitively, a direction in which the graph extends to infinity. Ends may be formalized mathematically as equivalence classes of infinite paths, as havens describing strategies for pursuit–evasion games on the graph, or as topological ends of topological spaces associated with the graph.

In the mathematical theory of matroids, the rank of a matroid is the maximum size of an independent set in the matroid. The rank of a subset S of elements of the matroid is, similarly, the maximum size of an independent subset of S, and the rank function of the matroid maps sets of elements to their ranks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maximal lotteries</span> Probabilistic Condorcet method

Maximal lotteries refers to a probabilistic voting rule. The method uses preferential ballots and returns a probability distribution of candidates that a majority of voters would weakly prefer to any other.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Planted clique</span> Complete subgraph added to a random graph

In computational complexity theory, a planted clique or hidden clique in an undirected graph is a clique formed from another graph by selecting a subset of vertices and adding edges between each pair of vertices in the subset. The planted clique problem is the algorithmic problem of distinguishing random graphs from graphs that have a planted clique. This is a variation of the clique problem; it may be solved in quasi-polynomial time but is conjectured not to be solvable in polynomial time for intermediate values of the clique size. The conjecture that no polynomial time solution exists is called the planted clique conjecture; it has been used as a computational hardness assumption.

References

  1. 1 2 Laslier, J.-F. [in French] (1997). Tournament Solutions and Majority Voting. Springer Verlag.
  2. 1 2 3 Felix Brandt; Markus Brill; Paul Harrenstein (28 April 2016). "Chapter 3: Tournament Solutions" (PDF). In Felix Brandt; Vincent Conitzer; Ulle Endriss; Jérôme Lang; Ariel D. Procaccia (eds.). Handbook of Computational Social Choice. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-1-316-48975-8.
  3. Brandt, F. (2009). Tournament Solutions - Extensions of Maximality and Their Applications to Decision-Making. Habilitation Thesis, Faculty for Mathematics, Computer Science, and Statistics, University of Munich.
  4. Scott Moser. "Chapter 6: Majority rule and tournament solutions". In J. C. Heckelman; N. R. Miller (eds.). Handbook of Social Choice and Voting. Edgar Elgar.
  5. Fisher, D. C.; Ryan, J. (1995). "Tournament games and positive tournaments". Journal of Graph Theory. 19 (2): 217–236. doi:10.1002/jgt.3190190208.
  6. Allesina, S.; Levine, J. M. (2011). "A competitive network theory of species diversity". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (14): 5638–5642. Bibcode:2011PNAS..108.5638A. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014428108 . PMC   3078357 . PMID   21415368.
  7. Landau, H. G. (1951). "On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: I. Effect of inherent characteristics". Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. 13 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1007/bf02478336.
  8. Felix Brandt; Felix Fischer (2007). "PageRank as a Weak Tournament Solution" (PDF). Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS). 3rd International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE). Vol. 4858. San Diego, USA: Springer. pp. 300–305.
  9. Siddartha Ramamohan; Arun Rajkumar; Shivani Agarwal (2016). Dueling Bandits: Beyond Condorcet Winners to General Tournament Solutions (PDF). 29th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2016). Barcelona, Spain.
  10. Fishburn, P. C. (1977). "Condorcet Social Choice Functions". SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics. 33 (3): 469–489. doi:10.1137/0133030.