List of electoral systems

Last updated

An electoral system (or voting system) is a set of rules that determine how elections and referendums are conducted and how their results are determined.

Contents

Some electoral systems elect a single winner (single candidate or option), while others elect multiple winners, such as members of parliament or boards of directors.

The study of formally defined electoral methods is called social choice theory or voting theory, and this study can take place within the field of political science, economics, or mathematics, and specifically within the subfields of game theory and mechanism design.

List of electoral systems by types

Key

Systems

Name(s)VariationsType of representation Mixed?Single/multi-winnerList / candidate-based systemType of decision ruleType of ballotNumber of votes / voterNumber of tiers

(if mixed)

First-past-the-post (FPTP/FPP) [1]

Single-member plurality (SMP/SMDP)

two-round system with lower than 50% requirement in first round majoritarian Nosingle-winnercandidate plurality single choice1
General ticket

Party-block voting (PBV)

majoritarian No multi-winner list plurality single choice1
Plurality block voting (BV)

plurality-at-large voting

(multiple non-transferable vote, MTNV)

limited party block voting majoritarian No multi-winner candidate plurality multiple choice=number of winners
Limited voting (LV)

limited block voting

partial block voting

(multiple non-transferable vote, MNTV)

limited party block voting semi-proportional No multi-winner candidate plurality multiple choice<number of winners
Single non-transferable vote (SNTV) semi-proportional No multi-winner candidate plurality single choice1
Single transferable vote (STV)

Hare–Clark electoral system [2]

(proportional ranked-choice voting) [3]

semi-proportional / proportional No multi-winner candidate quota ranked choice (ordinal voting)1 (effectively)
Instant-runoff voting (IRV) [4]

(Alternative vote - AV) [5]

(Ranked-choice voting - RCV) [6]

(Single-transferable vote - STV)

(Hare's method) [7]

contingent vote,

supplementary vote, Coombs' method

majoritarian Nosingle-winnercandidate majority ranked choice (ordinal voting)1 (effectively)
Two-round system (TRS) [8]

Runoff voting

Non-partisan primary,

multi-round voting

majoritarian Nosingle-winnercandidate majority single choice1 (each round)
Two-round block voting

(majority block voting)(multiple non-transferable vote, MNTV)

majoritarian No multi-winner candidate majority multiple choice=number of winners (each round)
Multiple transferable vote (MTV)

(Preferential block voting)

majoritarian No multi-winner candidate majority ranked choice (ordinal voting)=number of winners, effectively
Exhaustive ballot majoritarian Nosingle-winner /multi-winner candidate majority single choice1
Cumulative voting panachage (certain types) majoritarian / semi-proportional Nosingle-winner /multi-winner candidate plurality cumulative ballot>1
Approval voting (AV) [9] block approval voting majoritarian Nosingle-winner /multi-winner candidate plurality multiple choiceany number

(max. one for one candidate)

Score voting
Range voting
Approval voting (score voting 0-1) majoritarian / semi-proportional Nosingle-winner /multi-winner candidate plurality score ballot(cardinal voting)
Borda count majoritarian / semi-proportional Nosingle-winner /multi-winner candidate plurality ranked choice (ordinal voting)
Condorcet method Copeland's method,

Dodgson's method, Kemeny–Young method, Minimax, Nanson's method, ranked pairs, Schulze method, Tideman's alternative methods

majoritarian Nosingle-winnercandidatemajority against every candidate ranked choice (ordinal voting)
Party-list proportional representation

list-PR

Largest remainder Highest averages Binomial voting semi-proportional / proportional No multi-winner list (+ candidate, if open list) quota or divisor method single choice1 (effectively)
Superposition - non-compensatory combination of FPTP + List-PR

(Supplementary member system)

(Parallel voting) [10]

(Mixed-member majoritarian representation - MMM)

Two-round system + List-PR

mixed single vote version

semi-proportional Yes multi-winner(+ single-winner in districts)candidate + list mixed non-compensatorysingle choice2 (each tier)2
Seat-linkage compensatory combination of FPTP + List-PR

(Additional member system - AMS) [11]

(Mixed-member proportional representation - MMP)

mixed single vote version best-loser mixed-member proportional semi-proportional / proportional Yes multi-winner(+ single-winner in districts)candidate + list mixed compensatorysingle choice2 (each tier)2
Vote-linkage compensatory combination of FPTP + List-PR

Positive vote transfer system (PVT) [12]

(mixed single vote - MSV [13] )

(Additional member system - AMS)

negative vote transfer semi-proportional / proportional Yes multi-winner(+ single-winner in districts)candidate + list mixed compensatorysingle choice12
Dual member proportional (DMP) [14] semi-proportional / proportional Yes multi-winner list or candidate plurality single choice11

List of electoral systems used for national elections

Electoral systemSubtype / combinationType of representationCountries and territories that use it to elect primary (lower) chamber of legislature
First-past-the-post (FPTP/FPP) [1]
Single-member plurality (SMP/SMDP)
noWinner-take-all (single-winner)Antigua and Barbuda, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Bhutan, Botswana, Canada, Côte d'Ivoire, Dominica, Gambia, Ghana, Grenada, Jamaica, India, Kenya, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Micronesia, Myanmar, Nigeria, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, Palau, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkmenistan, Uganda, United Kingdom, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Zambia
General ticket

Party-list plurality block voting (PBV)

noWinner-take-allSingapore
Plurality block voting (BV)

plurality-at-large voting

noWinner-take-allLaos, Lebanon, Mauritius, Oman, Syria, Tonga, Tuvalu, Vietnam
Limited voting (LV)

limited block voting

noSemi-proportional
Single non-transferable vote (SNTV)noSemi-proportional
Single transferable vote (STV)noSemi-proportional / ProportionalIreland, Malta
Instant-runoff voting (IRV) [4] noSemi-proportionalAustralia, Papua New Guinea
Two-round system (TRS) [8]

Runoff voting

noWinner-take-all (single-winner)France
Two-round block voting

majority block voting

noWinner-take-all
Borda count noSemi-proportionalNauru
Modified cumulative voting noSemi-proportionalNorfolk Island
Party-list proportional representation (list-PR)Closed listProportional
Closed list, locally personalizedProportionalGermany
Open list for some partiesProportionalColombia
Open listProportionalAlbania, Algeria, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Fiji, Finland, Iceland, Indonesia, Jordan, Kosovo, Latvia, Netherlands, Norway, Peru, Poland, Sierra Leone, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Sweden
Panachage ProportionalEcuador, El Salvador, Honduras, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Switzerland
Superposition - non-compensatory combination of FPTP + List-PR

Parallel voting , Supplementary member system

FPTP + List-PR (two votes)Semi-proportionalCameroon, D.R.Congo, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Nepal, Philippines, Russia, Taiwan, Venezuela, Thailand
FPTP + List-PR (tied votes)Semi-proportionalItaly
FPTP + List-PR (proportional to FPTP)Winner-take-all / Semi-proportionalPakistan, Tanzania, Zimbabwe
TRS + List-PRSemi-proportionalEgypt, Lithuania, Tajikistan
BV/PBV + List-PRSemi-proportionalAndorra, Mauritania, Senegal, Monaco
Seat-linkage compensatory combination of FPTP + List-PR

Additional member system - AMS [11]

Mixed-member proportional representation - MMP

FPTP + List-PRSemi-proportional / ProportionalBolivia, Lesotho, New Zealand
FPTP + List-PR (hybrid)Semi-proportionalSouth Korea
FPTP + List-PR (limited disproportionality)Semi-proportionalMexico
Vote-linkage compensatory combination of FPTP + List-PRFPTP + List-PRSemi-proportionalHungary
Majority bonus systemList-PR with plurality bonusSemi-proportionalGreece
Majority jackpot systemMajority jackpotWinner-take-all / Semi-proportionalDjibouti
Majority/minority jackpotSemi-proportionalArmenia
Two-round majority jackpotSemi-proportional / ProportionalSan Marino
Electoral system for national legislatures

(lower house or unicameral)

Electoral systems map simplified.svg
   Majoritarian representation (winner-take-all)
  No election (e.g. Monarchy)

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Election</span> Process by which a population chooses the holder of a public office

An election is a formal group decision-making process by which a population chooses an individual or multiple individuals to hold public office.

Plurality voting refers to electoral systems in which the candidate in an electoral district who poll more than any other are elected.

Proportional representation (PR) refers to any type of electoral system under which subgroups of an electorate are reflected proportionately in the elected body. The concept applies mainly to political divisions among voters. The essence of such systems is that all votes cast – or almost all votes cast – contribute to the result and are effectively used to help elect someone. Under other election systems, a bare plurality or a scant majority are all that are used to elect anyone. Further, a PR system is one that produces mixed, balanced representation reflecting how votes are cast.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Party-list proportional representation</span> Family of voting systems

Party-list proportional representation (list-PR) is a system of proportional representation based on preregistered political parties, with each party being allocated a certain number of seats roughly proportional to their share of the vote.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Two-round system</span> Voting system

The two-round system is a voting method used to elect a single winner. In the United States, it is often called a jungle or nonpartisan primary. The system is also called runoff voting, though this term often means the closely-related exhaustive ballot and ranked-choice runoff systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Single transferable vote</span> Multi-winner electoral system

The single transferable vote (STV), sometimes mistakenly conflated with proportional ranked choice voting (P-RCV), is a multi-winner electoral system in which each voter casts a single vote in the form of a ranked-choice ballot. Voters have the option to rank candidates, and their vote may be transferred according to alternative preferences if their preferred candidate is eliminated or elected with surplus votes, so that their vote is used to elect someone they prefer over others in the running. STV aims to approach proportional representation based on votes cast in the district where it is used, so that each vote is worth about the same as another.

Single non-transferable vote or SNTV is an electoral system used to elect multiple winners. It is a generalization of first-past-the-post, applied to multi-member districts with each voter casting just one vote. Unlike FPTP, which is a single-winner system, in SNTV multiple winners are elected, typically in electoral districts; additionally, unlike FPTP, SNTV produces mixed representation and makes it unlikely for a single party to take all the seats in a city or a set area, which can happen under FPTP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voting</span> Method to make collective decisions

Voting is a method by which a group, such as a meeting or an electorate, convenes together for the purpose of making a collective decision or expressing an opinion usually following discussions, debates or election campaigns. Democracies elect holders of high office by voting. Residents of a jurisdiction represented by an elected official are called "constituents", and the constituents who choose to cast a ballot for their chosen candidate are called "voters." There are different systems for collecting votes, but while many of the systems used in decision-making can also be used as electoral systems, any which cater to proportional representation can only be used in elections.

Third party, or minor party, is a term used in the United States' two-party system for political parties other than the Republican and Democratic parties.

The term random ballot or random dictatorship refers to a randomized electoral system where the election is decided on the basis of a single randomly-selected ballot. A closely-related variant is called random serialdictatorship, which repeats the procedure and draws another ballot if multiple candidates are tied on the first ballot.

An electoral district, also known as an election district, legislative district, voting district, constituency, riding, ward, division, electorate, or (election) precinct, is a subdivision of a larger state created to provide its population with representation in the larger state's constituency. That body, or the state's constitution or a body established for that purpose, determines each district's boundaries and whether each will be represented by a single member or multiple members. Generally, only voters (constituents) who reside within the district are permitted to vote in an election held there. District representatives may be elected by a first-past-the-post system, a proportional representative system, or another voting method. They may be selected by a direct election under universal suffrage, an indirect election, or another form of suffrage.

In electoral systems, a wasted vote is any vote cast that does not impact the final election outcome.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">FairVote</span> U.S. electoral reform organization

FairVote is a 501(c)(3) organization and lobbying group in the United States. It was founded in 1992 as Citizens for Proportional Representation to support the implementation of proportional representation in American elections. Its focus changed over time to emphasize instant-runoff voting (IRV), a national popular vote, and universal voter registration. It changed its name to the Center for Voting and Democracy in 1993 and to FairVote in 2004.

Instant-runoff voting (IRV) is a ranked voting method used in single-winner elections. IRV is also known outside the US as the alternative vote (AV). Today it is in use at a national level to elect the Australian House of Representatives, the National Parliament of Papua New Guinea, the President of Ireland and President of India. In Australia it is also used for elections to the legislative assemblies of all states and territories except Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory, and for the Tasmanian Legislative Council.

Instant-runoff voting (IRV), also known as ranked-choice voting or the alternative vote (AV), combines ranked voting together with a system for choosing winners from these rankings by repeatedly eliminating the candidate with the fewest first-place votes and reassigning their votes until only one candidate is left. It can be seen as a modified form of a runoff election or exhaustive ballot in which, after eliminating some candidates, the choice among the rest is made from already-given voter rankings rather than from a separate election. Many sources conflate this system of choosing winners with ranked-choice voting more generally, for which several other systems of choosing winners have also been used.

Semi-proportional representation characterizes multi-winner electoral systems which allow representation of minorities, but are not intended to reflect the strength of the competing political forces in close proportion to the votes they receive. Semi-proportional voting systems are generally used as a compromise between complex and expensive but more-proportional systems and simple winner-take-all systems. Examples of semi-proportional systems include the single non-transferable vote, limited voting, and parallel voting.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electoral system</span> Method by which voters make a choice between options

An electoral system or voting system is a set of rules that determine how elections and referendums are conducted and how their results are determined. Electoral systems are used in politics to elect governments, while non-political elections may take place in business, non-profit organisations and informal organisations. These rules govern all aspects of the voting process: when elections occur, who is allowed to vote, who can stand as a candidate, how ballots are marked and cast, how the ballots are counted, how votes translate into the election outcome, limits on campaign spending, and other factors that can affect the result. Political electoral systems are defined by constitutions and electoral laws, are typically conducted by election commissions, and can use multiple types of elections for different offices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rural–urban proportional representation</span> Canadian hybrid proportional electoral system

Rural–urban proportional representation (RUP), also called flexible district PR, is a mixed electoral system which combines the use of single- and multi-member constituencies in a lower tier and top-up seats in an upper tier to meet the different needs of both rural and urban areas, while protecting the objective of proportionality. The term was coined by Fair Vote Canada, which devised a rural–urban system with the intention of meeting the special challenges of Canada's geography, which includes wide-flung, sparsely populated areas.

The mixed ballot transferable vote (MBTV) refers to a type of vote linkage-based mixed-member electoral system where a group of members are elected on local (lower) tier, for example in single-member districts (SMDs). Other members are elected on a compensatory national (upper) tier from a list and voters cast a single ballot where they may indicate their preferences separately.

The spare vote is a version of single transferable voting applied to the ranking of parties, first proposed for elections in Germany in 2013. This preferential party system is a ranked proportional representation electoral system applying to political parties instead of individual candidates. The spare vote refers to a secondary vote (preference) of the voter, which only comes into play if the first preference for the political party preferred by the voter, is below the electoral threshold. In Germany, there were draft laws for the spare vote system in Saarland, Schleswig-Holstein and Brandenburg federal states, but they were not implemented.

References

  1. 1 2 "First past the post". nzhistory.govt.nz. Ministry for Culture and Heritage. 13 January 2016. Archived from the original on 24 May 2022. Retrieved 25 May 2022.
  2. George Howatt, Democratic Representation under the Hare-Clark System – The Need for Seven-Member Electorates
  3. "How RCV Works". FairVote. Archived from the original on 2022-05-25. Retrieved 2022-06-11.
  4. 1 2 Cary, David (1 January 2011). "Estimating the Margin of Victory for Instant-runoff Voting". Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Electronic Voting Technology/Workshop on Trustworthy Elections. EVT/WOTE'11: 3. Archived from the original on 3 October 2018. Retrieved 11 June 2022.
  5. "Alternative Vote". www.electoral-reform.org.uk. Archived from the original on 2019-05-28. Retrieved 2019-05-30.
  6. FairVote.org. "Ranked Choice Voting / Instant Runoff". FairVote. Archived from the original on 7 January 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2021.
  7. Pacuit, Eric (3 August 2011). "Voting Methods". Archived from the original on 21 November 2021. Retrieved 11 June 2022 via plato.stanford.edu.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  8. 1 2 "Two-Round System". Electoral Reform Society. Archived from the original on 12 December 2021. Retrieved 7 Nov 2019.
  9. Brams, Steven; Fishburn, Peter (1978). "Approval Voting". American Political Science Review. 72 (3): 831–847. doi:10.2307/1955105. JSTOR   1955105. S2CID   251092061.
  10. "Parallel —". aceproject.org. Archived from the original on 2022-04-27. Retrieved 2022-04-21.
  11. 1 2 "Additional-member system: Politics". Encyclopædia Britannica . Archived from the original on 8 April 2020. Retrieved 24 March 2016.
  12. Bochsler, D (2014). "Which mixed-member proportional electoral formula fits you best? Assessing the proportionality principle of positive vote transfer systems". Representation. 50: 113–127. doi:10.1080/00344893.2014.902222. S2CID   153691414.
  13. Golosov, G. V. (2013). "The Case for Mixed Single Vote Electoral Systems". The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies.
  14. Graham, Sean (April 4, 2016). "Dual-Member Mixed Proportional: A New Electoral System for Canada". doi:10.7939/r3-qppp-b676. Archived from the original on December 4, 2020. Retrieved June 11, 2022.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)