Vision in fish

An oscar, Astronotus ocellatus, surveys its environment

Vision is an important sensory system for most species of fish. Fish eyes are similar to the eyes of terrestrial vertebrates like birds and mammals, but have a more spherical lens. Birds and mammals (including humans) normally adjust focus by changing the shape of their lens, but fish normally adjust focus by moving the lens closer to or further from the retina. Fish retinas generally have both rod cells and cone cells (for scotopic and photopic vision), and most species have colour vision. Some fish can see ultraviolet and some are sensitive to polarised light.

Among jawless fishes, the lamprey ^[1] has well-developed eyes, while the hagfish has only primitive eyespots. ^[2] The ancestors of modern hagfish, thought to be the protovertebrate, ^[3] were evidently pushed to very deep, dark waters, where they were less vulnerable to sighted predators, and where it is advantageous to have a convex eye-spot, which gathers more light than a flat or concave one. Fish vision shows evolutionary adaptation to their visual environment, for example deep sea fish have eyes suited to the dark environment.

Water as a visual environment

Each colour of visible light has unique wavelengths between about 400-700 nm and together they make up white light. Shorter wavelengths are on the violet and ultraviolet end of the spectrum, and the longer wavelengths are at the red and infrared end.

Comparison of the depths which different colours of light penetrate clear open ocean waters and the murkier coastal waters. Water absorbs the warmer long wavelengths colours, like reds and oranges, and scatters the cooler short wavelength colours.

Fish and other aquatic animals live in a different light environment than terrestrial species do. Water absorbs light so that with increasing depth the amount of light available decreases quickly. The optical properties of water also lead to different wavelengths of light being absorbed to different degrees. For example, visible light of long wavelengths (e.g. red, orange) is absorbed more in water than light of shorter wavelengths (green, blue). Ultraviolet light (even shorter wavelength than violet) can penetrate deeper than visual spectra. ^[5] Besides these universal qualities of water, different bodies of water may absorb light of different wavelengths due to varying salt and/or chemical presence in the water.

Water is very effective at absorbing incoming light, so the amount of light penetrating the ocean declines rapidly (is attenuated) with depth. In clear ocean water, at one metre depth only 45% of the solar energy that falls on the ocean surface remains. At 10 metres depth only 16% of the light is still present, and only 1% of the original light is left at 100 metres. No light penetrates beyond 1000 metres. ^[6]

In addition to overall attenuation, the oceans absorb the different wavelengths of light at different rates. The wavelengths at the extreme ends of the visible spectrum are attenuated faster than those wavelengths in the middle. Longer wavelengths are absorbed first. In clear ocean waters red is absorbed in the upper 10 metres, orange by about 40 metres, and yellow disappears before 100 metres. Shorter wavelengths penetrate further, with blue and green light reaching the deepest depths. ^[6] This is why things appear blue underwater: how colours are perceived by the eye depends on the wavelengths of light that are received by the eye. An object appears red to the eye because it reflects red light and absorbs other colours. So the only colour reaching the eye is red. Blue is the only colour of light available at depth underwater, so it is the only colour that can be reflected back to the eye, and everything has a blue tinge under water. A red object at depth will not appear red because there is no red light available to reflect off of the object. Objects in water will only appear as their real colours near the surface where all wavelengths of light are still available, or if the other wavelengths of light are provided artificially, such as by illuminating the object with a dive light. ^[6]

Structure and function

Diagrammatic vertical section through the eye of teleost fish. Fish have a refractive index gradient within the lens which compensates for spherical aberration. Unlike humans, most fish adjust focus by moving the lens closer or further from the retina. Teleosts do so by contracting the retractor lentis muscle.

Humans adjust focus by changing the lens shape

Fish eyes are broadly similar to those of other vertebrates – notably the tetrapods (amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals – all of which evolved from a fish ancestor). Light enters the eye at the cornea, passing through the pupil to reach the lens. Most fish species seem to have a fixed pupil size, but elasmobranches (like sharks and rays) have a muscular iris which allows pupil diameter to be adjusted. Pupil shape varies, and may be e.g. circular or slit-like. ^[5]

Lenses are normally spherical but can be slightly elliptical in some species. Compared to terrestrial vertebrates, fish lenses are generally more dense and spherical. In the aquatic environment there is not a major difference in the refractive index of the cornea and the surrounding water (compared to air on land) so the lens has to do the majority of the refraction. ^[7] Due to "a refractive index gradient within the lens — exactly as one would expect from optical theory", ^[8] the spherical lenses of fish are able to form sharp images free from spherical aberration. ^[7]

Once light passes through the lens, it is transmitted through a transparent liquid medium until it reaches the retina, containing the photoreceptors. Like other vertebrates, the photoreceptors are on the inside layer so light must pass through layers of other neurons before it reaches them. The retina contains rod cells and cone cells. ^[5] There are similarities between fish eyes and those of other vertebrates. Usually, light enters through the fish eye at the cornea and passes through the pupil in order to reach the lens. Most fish species have a fixed size of the pupil while a few species have a muscular iris that allows for the adjustment of the pupil diameter.

Fish eyes have a more spherical lens than other terrestrial vertebrates. Adjustment of focus in mammals and birds is normally done by changing the shape of the eye lens while in fish this is done through moving the lens further from or closer to the retina. The retina of a fish generally has both rod cells and cone cells that are responsible for scotopic and photopic vision. Most fish species have color vision. There are some species that are capable of seeing ultraviolet while some are sensitive to polarized light. ^[9]

The fish retina has rod cells that provide high visual sensitivity in low light conditions and cone cells that provide higher temporal and spatial resolution than the rod cells are capable of. They allow for the possibility of color vision through the comparison of absorbance across different types of cones. ^[10] According to Marshall et al., most animals in the marine habitat possess no or relatively simple color vision. However, there is a greater diversity in color vision in the ocean than there is on land. This is mainly due to extremes in photic habitat and colour behaviours. ^[11]

The retina

Within the retina, rod cells provide high visual sensitivity (at the cost of acuity), being used in low light conditions. Cone cells provide higher spatial and temporal resolution than rods can, and allow for the possibility of colour vision by comparing absorbances across different types of cones which are more sensitive to different wavelengths. The ratio of rods to cones depends on the ecology of the fish species concerned, e.g., those mainly active during the day in clear waters will have more cones than those living in low light environments. Colour vision is more useful in environments with a broader range of wavelengths available, e.g., near the surface in clear waters rather than in deeper water where only a narrow band of wavelengths persist. ^[5]

The distribution of photoreceptors across the retina is not uniform. Some areas have higher densities of cone cells, for example (see fovea). Fish may have two or three areas specialised for high acuity (e.g. for prey capture) or sensitivity (e.g. from dim light coming from below). The distribution of photoreceptors may also change over time during development of the individual. This is especially the case when the species typically moves between different light environments during its life cycle (e.g. shallow to deep waters, or fresh water to ocean). ^[5] or when food spectrum changes accompany the growth of a fish as seen with the Antarctic icefish Champsocephalus gunnari. ^[12]

Some species have a tapetum, a reflective layer which bounces light that passes through the retina back through it again. This enhances sensitivity in low light conditions, such as nocturnal and deep sea species, by giving photons a second chance to be captured by photoreceptors. ^[7] However this comes at a cost of reduced resolution. Some species are able to effectively turn their tapetum off in bright conditions, with a dark pigment layer covering it as needed. ^[5]

The retina uses a lot of oxygen compared to most other tissues, and is supplied with plentiful oxygenated blood to ensure optimal performance. ^[5]

Accommodation

Accommodation is the process by which the vertebrate eye adjusts focus on an object as it moves closer or further away. Whereas birds and mammals achieve accommodation by deforming the lens of their eyes, fish and amphibians normally adjust focus by moving the lens closer or further from the retina. ^[5] They use a special muscle which changes the distance of the lens from the retina. In bony fishes the muscle is called the retractor lentis, and is relaxed for near vision, whereas for cartilaginous fishes the muscle is called the protractor lentis, and is relaxed for far vision. Thus bony fishes accommodate for distance vision by moving the lens closer to the retina, while cartilaginous fishes accommodate for near vision by moving the lens further from the retina. ^{[13] [14] [15]}

Stabilising images

Horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex in goldfish, flatfish and sharks

There is a need for some mechanism that stabilises images during rapid head movements. This is achieved by the vestibulo-ocular reflex, which is a reflex eye movement that stabilises images on the retina by producing eye movements in the direction opposite to head movements, thus preserving the image on the centre of the visual field. For example, when the head moves to the right, the eyes move to the left, and vice versa. The human vestibulo-ocular reflex is a reflex eye movement that stabilises images on the retina during head movement by producing an eye movement in the direction opposite to head movement, thus preserving the image on the center of the visual field. In a similar manner, fish have a vestibulo-ocular reflex which stabilises visual images on the retina when it moves its tail. ^[16] In many animals, including human beings, the inner ear functions as the biological analogue of an accelerometer in camera image stabilization systems, to stabilise the image by moving the eyes. When a rotation of the head is detected, an inhibitory signal is sent to the extraocular muscles on one side and an excitatory signal to the muscles on the other side. The result is a compensatory movement of the eyes. Typical human eye movements lag head movements by less than 10 ms. ^[17]

The diagram on the right shows the horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex circuitry in bony and cartilaginous fish.

• "Goldfish" shows the principal three-neuronal vestibulo-ocular reflex linking the horizontal semicircular canal with contralateral abducens (ABD) and ipsilateral MR motoneurons. ^[18]
• "Flatfish" shows that after 90° displacement of the vestibular relative to visual axis (metamorphosis) compensatory eye movements are produced by redirecting horizontal canal signals to vertical and oblique motoneurons. ^{[19] [20]}
• In "Shark" horizontal canal/second order neurons project to contralateral ABD and MR motoneurons including ipsilateral AI neurons. 1°, first order vestibular neuron; ATD, Ascending tract of Deiter's. ^[20]

Ultraviolet

Fish vision is mediated by four visual pigments that absorb various wavelengths of light. Each pigment is constructed from a chromophore and the transmembrane protein, known as opsin. Mutations in opsin have allowed for visual diversity, including variation in wavelength absorption. ^[21] A mutation of the opsin on the SWS-1 pigment allows some vertebrates to absorb UV light (≈360 nm), so they can see objects that reflect UV light. ^[22] A wide range of fish species has developed and maintained this visual trait throughout evolution, suggesting it is advantageous. UV vision may be related to foraging, communication, and mate selection.

The leading theory regarding the evolutionary selection of UV vision in select fish species is due to its strong role in mate selection. Behavioral experiments show that African cichlids utilise visual cues when choosing a mate. Their breeding sites are typically in shallow waters with high clarity and UV light penetration. Male African cichlids are largely a blue colour that is reflective in UV light. Females are able to correctly choose a mate of their species when these reflective visual cues are present. This suggests that UV light detection is crucial for correct mate selection. ^[23] UV reflective colour patterns also enhance male attractiveness in guppies and three-spined sticklebacks. In experimental settings, female guppies spent significantly more time inspecting males with UV-reflective colouring than those with UV reflection blocked. ^[24] Similarly, female three-spined sticklebacks preferred males viewed in full spectrum over those viewed in UV blocking filters. ^[25] These results strongly suggest the role of UV detection in sexual selection and, thus, reproductive fitness. The prominent role of UV light detection in fish mate choice has allowed the trait to be maintained over time. UV vision may also be related to foraging and other communication behaviors.

Many species of fish can see the ultraviolet end of the spectrum, beyond the violet. ^[26]

Ultraviolet vision is sometimes used during only part of the life cycle of a fish. For example, juvenile brown trout live in shallow water where they use ultraviolet vision to enhance their ability to detect zooplankton. As they get older, they move to deeper waters where there is little ultraviolet light. ^[22]

The two stripe damselfish, Dascyllus reticulatus, has ultraviolet-reflecting colouration which they appear to use as an alarm signal to other fish of their species. ^[27] Predatory species cannot see this if their vision is not sensitive to ultraviolet. There is further evidence for this view that some fish use ultraviolet as a "high-fidelity secret communication channel hidden from predators", while yet other species use ultraviolet to make social or sexual signals. ^{[5] [28]}

Polarised light

It is not easy to establish whether a fish is sensitive to polarised light, though it appears likely in a number of taxa. It has been unambiguously demonstrated in anchovies. ^[29] The ability to detect polarised light may provide better contrast and/or directional information for migrating species. Polarised light is most abundant at dawn and dusk. ^[5] Polarised light reflected from the scales of a fish may enable other fish to better detect it against a diffuse background, ^[30] and may provide useful information to schooling fish about their proximity and orientation relative to neighbouring fish. ^[31] Some experiments indicate that, by using polarization, some fish can tune their vision to give them double their normal prey sighting distance. ^[9]

Double cones

Most fish have double cones, a pair of cone cells joined to each other. Each member of the double cone may have a different peak absorbance, and behavioural evidence supports the idea that each type of individual cone in a double cone can provide separate information (i.e. the signal from individual members of the double cone are not necessarily summed together). ^[32]

Adaptation to habitat

Four-eyed fish
The four-eyed fish feeds at the surface of the water with eyes that allow it to see both above and below the surface at the same time.

Eye of a four-eyed fish
1 Underwater retina 2) Lens 3) Air pupil
4) Tissue band 5) Iris 6) Underwater pupil
7) Air retina 8) Optic nerve

The telescopefish has large, forward-pointing telescoping eyes with large lenses.

The deepwater Antarctic toothfish has large, upward looking eyes. ^[34]

The mesopelagic sabertooth is an ambush predator with telescopic, upward-pointing eyes.

Deepwater fishes often have large, upward looking eyes, adapted to detect prey silhouetted against the gloom above.

Fishes that live in surface waters down to about 200 metres, epipelagic fishes, live in a sunlit zone where visual predators use visual systems which are designed pretty much as might be expected. But even so, there can be unusual adaptations. Four-eyed fish have eyes raised above the top of the head and divided in two different parts, so that they can see below and above the water surface at the same time. Four-eyed fish actually have only two eyes, but their eyes are specially adapted for their surface-dwelling lifestyle. The eyes are positioned on the top of the head, and the fish floats at the water surface with only the lower half of each eye underwater. The two halves are divided by a band of tissue and the eye has two pupils, connected by part of the iris. The upper half of the eye is adapted for vision in air, the lower half for vision in water. ^[35] The lens of the eye changes in thickness top to bottom to account for the difference in the refractive indices of air versus water. These fish spend most of their time at the surface of the water. Their diet mostly consists of the terrestrial insects which are available at the surface. ^[36]

Mesopelagic fishes live in deeper waters, in the twilight zone down to depths of 1000 metres, where the amount of sunlight available is not sufficient to support photosynthesis. These fish are adapted for an active life under low light conditions. Most of them are visual predators with large eyes. Some of the deeper water fish have tubular eyes with big lenses and only rod cells that look upwards. These give binocular vision and great sensitivity to small light signals. ^[37] This adaptation gives improved terminal vision at the expense of lateral vision, and allows the predator to pick out squid, cuttlefish, and smaller fish that are silhouetted against the gloom above them. For more sensitive vision in low light, some fish have a retroreflector behind the retina. Flashlight fish have this plus photophores, which they use in combination to detect eyeshine in other fish. ^{[38] [39] [40]}

Still deeper down the water column, below 1000 metres, are found the bathypelagic fishes. At this depth the ocean is pitch black, and the fish are sedentary, adapted to outputting minimum energy in a habitat with very little food and no sunlight. Bioluminescence is the only light available at these depths. This lack of light means the organisms have to rely on senses other than vision. Their eyes are small and may not function at all. ^{[41] [42]}

At the very bottom of the ocean flatfish can be found. Flatfish are benthic fish with a negative buoyancy so they can rest on the seafloor. Although flatfish are bottom dwellers, they are not usually deep sea fish, but are found mainly in estuaries and on the continental shelf. When flatfish larvae hatch they have the elongated and symmetric shape of a typical bony fish. The larvae do not dwell on the bottom, but float in the sea as plankton. Eventually they start metamorphosing into the adult form. One of the eyes migrates across the top of the head and onto the other side of the body, leaving the fish blind on one side. The larva loses its swim bladder and spines, and sinks to the bottom, laying its blind side on the underlying surface. ^[43] Richard Dawkins explains this as an example of evolutionary adaptation

...bony fish as a rule have a marked tendency to be flattened in a vertical direction.... It was natural, therefore, that when the ancestors of [flatfish] took to the sea bottom, they should have lain on one side.... But this raised the problem that one eye was always looking down into the sand and was effectively useless. In evolution this problem was solved by the lower eye 'moving' round to the upper side. ^[44]

• 
  Most deep-sea fish cannot see red light. The deepwater stoplight loosejaw produces red bioluminescence so it can hunt with an effectively invisible beam of light. ^[45]
• 
  When the larvae of a flatfish grows, the eye on one side rotates to the other side so the fish can rest on the seafloor.
• 
  The European plaice is a flatfish with raised eyes, so when it buries itself in sand for camouflage it can still see.

Prey usually have eyes on the sides of their head so they have a large field of view, from which to avoid predators. Predators usually have eyes in front of their head so they have better depth perception. ^{[46] [47]} Benthic predators, like flatfish, have eyes arranged so they have a binocular view of what is above them as they lie on the bottom.

Colouration

See also: Underwater camouflage and mimicry and Animals that can change color

Fish have evolved sophisticated ways of using colouration. For example, prey fish have ways of using colouration to make it more difficult for visual predators to see them. In pelagic fish, these adaptations are mainly concerned with a reduction in silhouette, a form of camouflage. One method of achieving this is to reduce the area of their shadow by lateral compression of the body. Another method, also a form of camouflage, is by countershading in the case of epipelagic fish and by counter-illumination in the case of mesopelagic fish. Countershading is achieved by colouring the fish with darker pigments at the top and lighter pigments at the bottom in such a way that the colouring matches the background. When seen from the top, the darker dorsal area of the animal blends into the darkness of the water below, and when seen from below, the lighter ventral area blends into the sunlight from the surface. Counter illumination is achieved via bioluminescence by the production of light from ventral photophores, aimed at matching the light intensity from the underside of the fish with the light intensity from the background. ^[48]

Benthic fish, which rest on the seafloor, physically hide themselves by burrowing into sand or retreating into nooks and crannies, or camouflage themselves by blending into the background or by looking like a rock or piece of seaweed. ^[49]

While these tools may be effective as predator avoidance mechanisms, they also serve as equally effective tools for the predators themselves. For example, the deepwater velvet belly lantern shark uses counter-illumination to hide from its prey. ^[50]

• 
  Epipelagic fish, like this Atlantic bluefin tuna, are typically countershaded with silvery colours.
• 
  The foureye butterflyfish has false eyes on its back end, confusing predators about which is the front end of the fish.
• 
  The John Dory has a large eye spot in the middle of its body, confusing prey.

Some fish species also display false eyespots. The foureye butterflyfish gets its name from a large dark spot on the rear portion of each side of the body. This spot is surrounded by a brilliant white ring, resembling an eyespot. A black vertical bar on the head runs through the true eye, making it hard to see. ^[51] This can result in a predator thinking the fish is bigger than it is, and confusing the back end with the front end. The butterflyfish's first instinct when threatened is to flee, putting the false eyespot closer to the predator than the head. Most predators aim for the eyes, and this false eyespot tricks the predator into believing that the fish will flee tail first.

The John Dory is a benthopelagic coastal fish with a high laterally compressed body. Its body is so thin that it can hardly be seen from the front. It also has a large dark spot on both sides, which is used to flash an "evil eye" if danger approaches. The large eyes at the front of the head provide it with the bifocal vision and depth perception it needs to catch prey. The John Dory's eye spot on the side of its body also confuses prey, which is then sucked into its mouth. ^[52]

Barreleyes

Left: The barreleye has barrel-shaped, telescopic eyes which are
generally directed upwards, but can also be swivelled forward
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Right: The brownsnout spookfish is the only vertebrate known
to employ a mirror eye (as well as a lens):
(1) diverticulum (2) main eye
(a) retina (b) reflective crystals (c) lens (d) retina

External videos
Barreleye fish – Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Barreleyes are a family of small, unusual-looking mesopelagic fishes, named for their barrel-shaped, tubular eyes which are generally directed upwards to detect the silhouettes of available prey. ^{[53] [54]} Barreleyes have large, telescoping eyes which dominate and protrude from the skull. These eyes generally gaze upwards, but can also be swivelled forwards in some species. Their eyes have a large lens and a retina with an exceptional number of rod cells and a high density of rhodopsin (the "visual purple" pigment); there are no cone cells. ^[53]

The barreleye species, Macropinna microstoma , has a transparent protective dome over the top of its head, somewhat like the dome over an airplane cockpit, through which the lenses of its eyes can be seen. The dome is tough and flexible, and presumably protects the eyes from the nematocysts (stinging cells) of the siphonophores from which it is believed the barreleye steals food. ^{[53] [54] [55]}

Another barreleye species, the brownsnout spookfish, is the only vertebrate known to employ a mirror, as opposed to a lens, to focus an image in its eyes. ^{[56] [57]} It is unusual in that it utilises both refractive and reflective optics to see. The main tubular eye contains a lateral ovoid swelling called a diverticulum, largely separated from the eye by a septum. The retina lines most of the interior of the eye, and there are two corneal openings, one directed up and the other down, that allow light into the main eye and the diverticulum respectively. The main eye employs a lens to focus its image, as in other fishes. However, inside the diverticulum the light is reflected and focused onto the retina by a curved composite mirror derived from the retinal tapetum, composed of many layers of small reflective plates possibly made of guanine crystals. The split structure of the brownsnout spookfish eye allows the fish to see both up and down at the same time. In addition, the mirror system is superior to a lens in gathering light. It is likely that the main eye serves to detect objects silhouetted against the sunlight, while the diverticulum serves to detect bioluminescent flashes from the sides and below. ^[56]

Sharks

Eye of a bigeyed sixgill shark

Shark eyes are similar to the eyes of other vertebrates, including similar lenses, corneas and retinas, though their eyesight is well adapted to the marine environment with the help of a tissue called tapetum lucidum. This tissue is behind the retina and reflects light back to it, thereby increasing visibility in the dark waters. The effectiveness of the tissue varies, with some sharks having stronger nocturnal adaptations. Many sharks can contract and dilate their pupils, like humans, something no teleost fish can do. Sharks have eyelids, but they do not blink because the surrounding water cleans their eyes. To protect their eyes some species have nictitating membranes. This membrane covers the eyes while hunting and when the shark is being attacked. However, some species, including the great white shark (Carcharodon carcharias), do not have this membrane, but instead roll their eyes backwards to protect them when striking prey. The importance of sight in shark hunting behavior is debated. Some believe that electro- and chemoreception are more significant, while others point to the nictating membrane as evidence that sight is important. Presumably, the shark would not protect its eyes were they unimportant. The use of sight probably varies with species and water conditions. The shark's field of vision can swap between monocular and stereoscopic at any time. ^[58] A micro-spectrophotometry study of 17 species of shark found 10 had only rod photoreceptors and no cone cells in their retinas giving them good night vision while making them colourblind. The remaining seven species had in addition to rods a single type of cone photoreceptor sensitive to green and, seeing only in shades of grey and green, are believed to be effectively colourblind. The study indicates that an object's contrast against the background, rather than colour, may be more important for object detection. ^{[59] [60] [61]}

Other examples

By schooling together, small fish provide many eyes as a precaution against ambush, and can visually confuse predators if they do attack.

The omega iris allows Loricariids to adjust the amount of light that enters their eye.

Small fish often school together for safety. This can have visual advantages, both by visually confusing predator fishes, and by providing many eyes for the school regarded as a body. The "predator confusion effect" is based on the idea that it becomes difficult for predators to pick out individual prey from groups because the many moving targets create a sensory overload of the predator's visual channel. ^[62] "Shoaling fish are the same size and silvery, so it is difficult for a visually oriented predator to pick an individual out of a mass of twisting, flashing fish and then have enough time to grab its prey before it disappears into the shoal." ^[63] The "many eyes effect" is based on the idea that as the size of the group increases, the task of scanning the environment for predators can be spread out over many individuals, a mass collaboration presumably providing a higher level of vigilance. ^{[64] [65]}

Fish are normally cold-blooded, with body temperatures the same as the surrounding water. However, some oceanic predatory fish, such as swordfish and some shark and tuna species, can warm parts of their body when they hunt for prey in deep and cold water. The highly visual swordfish uses a heating system involving its muscles which raises the temperature in its eyes and brain by up to 15 °C. The warming of the retina improves the rate at which the eyes respond to changes in rapid motion made by its prey by as much as ten times. ^{[66] [67] [68]}

Some fish have eyeshine. ^[69] Eyeshine is the result of a light-gathering layer in the eyes called the tapetum lucidum, which reflects white light. It does not occur in humans, but can be seen in other species, such as deer in a headlight. Eyeshine allows fish to see well in low-light conditions as well as in turbid (stained or rough, breaking) waters, giving them an advantage over their prey. This enhanced vision allows fish to populate the deeper regions in the ocean or a lake. In particular, freshwater walleye are so named because their eyeshine. ^[70]

Many species of Loricariidae, a family of catfish, have a modified iris called an omega iris. The top part of the iris descends to form a loop which can expand and contract called an iris operculum; when light levels are high, the pupil reduces in diameter and the loop expands to cover the center of the pupil giving rise to a crescent shaped light transmitting portion. ^[71] This feature gets its name from its similarity to an upside-down Greek letter omega (Ω). The origins of this structure are unknown, but it has been suggested that breaking up the outline of the highly visible eye aids camouflage in what are often highly mottled animals. ^[71]

Distance sensory systems

Blind cavefish find their way around by means of lateral lines, which are highly sensitive to changes in water pressure.

Visual systems are distance sensory systems which provide fish with data about location or objects at a distance without a need for the fish to directly touch them. Such distance sensing systems are important, because they allow communication with other fish, and provide information about the location of food and predators, and about avoiding obstacles or maintaining position in fish schools. For example, some schooling species have "schooling marks" on their sides, such as visually prominent stripes which provide reference marks and help adjacent fish judge their relative positions. ^[73] But the visual system is not the only one that can perform such functions. Some schooling fish also have a lateral line running the length of their bodies. This lateral line enables the fish to sense changes in water pressure and turbulence adjacent to its body. Using this information, schooling fish can adjust their distance from adjacent fish if they come too close or stray too far. ^[73]

The visual system in fish is augmented by other sensing systems with comparable or complementary functions. Some fish are blind, and must rely entirely on alternate sensing systems. ^[74] Other senses which can also provide data about location or distant objects include hearing and echolocation, electroreception, magnetoception and chemoreception (smell and taste). For example, catfish have chemoreceptors across their entire bodies, which means they "taste" anything they touch and "smell" any chemicals in the water. "In catfish, gustation plays a primary role in the orientation and location of food". ^[75]

Cartilaginous fish (sharks, stingrays and chimaeras) use magnetoception. They possess special electroreceptors called the ampullae of Lorenzini which detect a slight variation in electric potential. These receptors, located along the mouth and nose of the fish, operate according to the principle that a time-varying magnetic field moving through a conductor induces an electric potential across the ends of the conductor. The ampullae may also allow the fish to detect changes in water temperature. ^{[76] [77]} As in birds, magnetoception may provide information which help the fish map migration routes. ^[78]

See also

• Arthropod eye
• Matthiessen's ratio
• Mollusc eye
• Parietal eye
• Simple eye in invertebrates
• Visual system

Notes

1. Meyer‐Rochow, V. Benno; Stewart, Duncan (1996). "Review of larval and postlarval eye ultrastructure in the lamprey (cyclostomata) with special emphasis on Geotria australis (gray)". Microscopy Research and Technique. 35 (6): 431–444. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19961215)35:6<431::AID-JEMT3>3.0.CO;2-L. PMID   9016447. S2CID   22940203.
2. Lamb, Trevor D.; Collin, Shaun P.; Pugh, Edward N. (2007). "Evolution of the vertebrate eye: opsins, photoreceptors, retina and eye cup". Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 8 (12): 960–976. doi:10.1038/nrn2283. ISSN   1471-003X. PMC   3143066 . PMID   18026166. See also Lamb et al.'s The origin of the Vertebrate Eye, 2008.
3. Trevor D. Lamb; Shaun P. Collin; Edward N. Pugh Jr (2007). "Evolution of the vertebrate eye: opsins, photoreceptors, retina and eye cup". Nature Reviews Neuroscience . 8 (12): 960–976. doi:10.1038/nrn2283. PMC   3143066 . PMID   18026166.
4. Ocean Explorer NOAA. Updated: 26 August 2010.
5. Helfman et al. 2009, pp. 84–87.
6. Webb, Paul (2019) Introduction to Oceanography, chapter 6.5 Light, Rebus Community, Roger Williams University, open textbook. Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
7. Land, M. F.; Nilsson, D. (2012). Animal Eyes. Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780199581146.
8. Wehner, R (2005). "Sensory physiology: brainless eyes" (PDF). Nature. 435 (7039): 157–159. Bibcode:2005Natur.435..157W. doi:10.1038/435157a. PMID   15889076. S2CID   4408533.
9. Novales Flamarique, Iñigo (2019). "Swimming behaviour tunes fish polarization vision to double prey sighting distance". Scientific Reports. 9 (1): 944. Bibcode:2019NatSR...9..944N. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37632-1. PMC   6353921 . PMID   30700806.
10. Ingram, Norianne T.; Sampath, Alapakkam P.; Fain, Gordon L. (2016). "Why are rods more sensitive than cones?". The Journal of Physiology. 594 (19): 5415–5426. doi:10.1113/JP272556. PMC   5043029 . PMID   27218707.
11. Marshall, Justin; Carleton, Karen L.; Cronin, Thomas (2015). "Colour vision in marine organisms". Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 34: 86–94. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2015.02.002. PMID   25725325. S2CID   20978931.
12. Miyazaki, T; Iwamu, T; Meyer-Rochow, VB (2011). "The position of the retinal area centralis changes with age in Champsocephalus gunnari (Channichthyidae), a predatory fish from coastal Antarctic waters". Polar Biology. 34 (8): 1117–1123. doi:10.1007/s00300-011-0969-2. S2CID   19066809.
13. Schwab, IR; Hart, N (2006). "More than black and white". British Journal of Ophthalmology. 90 (4): 406. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.085571. PMC   1857009 . PMID   16572506.
14. Schwab, Ivan R. (2012) Evolution's Witness: How Eyes Evolved Page 82. Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780195369748.
15. Khorramshahia, O; Schartaua, JM; Krögera, RHH (2008). "A complex system of ligaments and a muscle keep the crystalline lens in place in the eyes of bony fishes (teleosts)". Vision Research. 48 (13): 1503–1508. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.03.017 . PMID   18471852. S2CID   17757889.
16. Singh H.R. and Khanna S.S. (1994) Advances in fish biology, p. 235, Hindustan Pub. ISBN   978-81-7075-029-1.
17. Barnes, G R (1 February 1979). "Vestibulo-ocular function during co-ordinated head and eye movements to acquire visual targets". The Journal of Physiology. 287 (1): 127–147. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012650. PMC   1281486 . PMID   311828.
18. Graf, Werner; Spencer, Robert; Baker, Harriet; Baker, Robert (1 May 1997). "Excitatory and Inhibitory Vestibular Pathways to the Extraocular Motor Nuclei in Goldfish". Journal of Neurophysiology. 77 (5): 2765–2779. doi:10.1152/jn.1997.77.5.2765. PMID   9163391. S2CID   13004673.
19. Graf, W.; Baker, R. (1 October 1985). "The vestibuloocular reflex of the adult flatfish. II. Vestibulooculomotor connectivity". Journal of Neurophysiology. 54 (4): 900–916. doi:10.1152/jn.1985.54.4.900. PMID   4067626.
20. Graf, Werner; Spencer, Robert; Baker, Harriet; Baker, Robert (1 September 2001). "Vestibuloocular Reflex of the Adult Flatfish. III. A Species-Specific Reciprocal Pattern of Excitation and Inhibition". Journal of Neurophysiology. 86 (3): 1376–1388. doi:10.1152/jn.2001.86.3.1376. PMID   11535684.
21. Yokoyama, Shozo; Yokoyama, Ruth (November 1996). "Adaptive evolution of photoreceptors and visual pigments in vertebrates". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 27 (1): 543–567. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.543.
22. Shi, Yongsheng; Yokoyama, Shozo (8 July 2003). "Molecular analysis of the evolutionary significance of ultraviolet vision in vertebrates". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 100 (14): 8308–8313. Bibcode:2003PNAS..100.8308S. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1532535100 . PMC   166225 . PMID   12824471.
23. Carleton, Karen L; Hárosi, Ferenc I; Kocher, Thomas D (April 2000). "Visual pigments of African cichlid fishes: evidence for ultraviolet vision from microspectrophotometry and DNA sequences". Vision Research. 40 (8): 879–890. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00238-2 . PMID   10720660. S2CID   5420659.
24. Kodric-Brown, Astrid; Johnson, Sally C. (1 February 2002). "Ultraviolet reflectance patterns of male guppies enhance their attractiveness to females". Animal Behaviour. 63 (2): 391–396. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1917. S2CID   53172856.
25. Rick, Ingolf P.; Modarressie, Ricarda; Bakker, Theo C.M. (February 2006). "UV wavelengths affect female mate choice in three-spined sticklebacks". Animal Behaviour. 71 (2): 307–313. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.03.039. S2CID   937644.
26. Jacobs, Gerald H. (August 1992). "Ultraviolet Vision in Vertebrates". American Zoologist. 32 (4): 544–554. doi: 10.1093/icb/32.4.544 .
27. Losey, George S (1 August 2003). "Crypsis and communication functions of UV-visible coloration in two coral reef damselfish, Dascyllus aruanus and D.reticulatus *". Animal Behaviour. 66 (2): 299–307. doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2214. S2CID   140204848.
28. Siebeck, Ulrike E.; Parker, Amira N.; Sprenger, Dennis; Mäthger, Lydia M.; Wallis, Guy (March 2010). "A Species of Reef Fish that Uses Ultraviolet Patterns for Covert Face Recognition". Current Biology. 20 (5): 407–410. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.047 . PMID   20188557. S2CID   3743161.
29. Horváth G and Varjú D (2004) Polarized light in animal vision: polarization patterns in nature p. 294, Springer. ISBN   978-3-540-40457-6.
30. Denton, EJ; Nichol, JAC (1965). "Polarization of light reflected from the silvery exterior of the bleak Alburnus alburnus" (PDF). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 150: 78–94.
31. Rowe, DM; Denton, EJ (1997). "The physical basis of reflective communication between fish, with special reference to the horse mackerel, Trachurus trachurus". Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 352 (1353): 531–549. Bibcode:1997RSPTB.352..531R. doi:10.1098/rstb.1997.0037. PMC   1691948 .
32. Pignatelli, V.; Champ, C.; Marshall, J.; Vorobyev, M. (2010). "Double cones are used for colour discrimination in the reef fish, Rhinecanthus aculeatus". Biology Letters . 6 (4): 537–539. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.1010. PMC   2936199 . PMID   20129950.
33. Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.) (2010). "Gigantura chuni" in FishBase. October 2010 version.
34. Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.) (2009). "Dissostichus mawsoni" in FishBase. August 2009 version.
35. Nelson, Joseph, S. (2006). Fishes of the World. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN   978-0-471-25031-9.
36. Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.) (2007). "Anableps anableps" in FishBase . Mar 2007 version.
37. Moyle & Cech 2004, p. 585.
38. Morin, James G.; Harrington, Anne; Nealson, Kenneth; Krieger, Neil; Baldwin, Thomas O.; Hastings, J. W. (1975). "Light for All Reasons: Versatility in the Behavioral Repertoire of the Flashlight Fish". Science. 190 (4209): 74–76. Bibcode:1975Sci...190...74M. doi:10.1126/science.190.4209.74. S2CID   83905458.
39. McCosker, John E. (March 1977). "Flashlight Fishes". Scientific American. 236 (3): 106–114. Bibcode:1977SciAm.236c.106M. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0377-106. JSTOR   24953941. PMID   841297.
40. Paxton, John R. (1998). Paxton, J.R.; Eschmeyer, W.N. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Fishes. San Diego: Academic Press. p. 162. ISBN   978-0-12-547665-2.
41. Ryan P "Deep-sea creatures: The bathypelagic zone" Te Ara – the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Updated 21 September 2007.
42. Moyle & Cech 2004, p. 587.
43. Chapleau, Francois & Amaoka, Kunio (1998). Paxton, J.R. & Eschmeyer, W.N. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Fishes. San Diego: Academic Press. xxx. ISBN   978-0-12-547665-2.
44. Dawkins, Richard (1991). The Blind Watchmaker. London: Penguin Books. p. 92. ISBN   978-0-14-014481-9.
45. Kenaley, C.P (2007). "Revision of the Stoplight Loosejaw Genus Malacosteus (Teleostei: Stomiidae: Malacosteinae), with Description of a New Species from the Temperate Southern Hemisphere and Indian Ocean". Copeia. 2007 (4): 886–900. doi:10.1643/0045-8511(2007)7[886:ROTSLG]2.0.CO;2. S2CID   1038874.
46. "Carnivores". U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 14 December 2009. Archived from the original on 14 June 2011. Retrieved 28 March 2011.
47. Boroditsky, Lera (24 June 1999). "Light & Eyes: Lecture Notes". Lecture Notes. Stanford. Archived from the original on 5 July 2010. Retrieved 11 May 2010.
48. Countershading BBC: Science and Nature. Retrieved 28 September 2011.
49. Fishy friends and fishy foes Preparation manual, Long Beach Marine Institute.
50. Claes, Julien M.; Aksnes, Dag L.; Mallefet, Jérôme (May 2010). "Phantom hunter of the fjords: Camouflage by counterillumination in a shark (Etmopterus spinax)". Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 388 (1–2): 28–32. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2010.03.009.
51. FishBase Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.) (2009). "Chaetodon capistratus" in FishBase . July 2009 version.
52. Walrond, Carl (2006) Coastal fish - Fish of the open sea floor, Te Ara: Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Accessed 28 May 2019.
53. Robison, Bruce H.; Reisenbichler, Kim R. (18 December 2008). "Macropinna microstoma and the Paradox of Its Tubular Eyes". Copeia. 2008 (4): 780–784. doi:10.1643/CG-07-082. S2CID   85768623.
54. Robison, Bruce H.; Reisenbichler, Kim R. (18 December 2008). "Macropinna microstoma and the Paradox of Its Tubular Eyes". Copeia. 2008 (4): 780–784. doi:10.1643/CG-07-082. JSTOR   25512162. S2CID   85768623. ProQuest   207224476.
    • "Researchers solve mystery of deep-sea fish with tubular eyes and transparent head". Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (Press release). 23 February 2009.
55. Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.) (2011). "Macropinna microstoma" in FishBase . September 2011 version.
56. Wagner, Hans-Joachim; Douglas, Ron H.; Frank, Tamara M.; Roberts, Nicholas W.; Partridge, Julian C. (January 2009). "A Novel Vertebrate Eye Using Both Refractive and Reflective Optics". Current Biology. 19 (2): 108–114. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.061 . PMID   19110427. S2CID   18680315.
57. Reporter, Lewis Smith, Environment (8 January 2009). "Fish with four eyes can see through the deep sea gloom". The Times.
58. Martin, R. Aidan. "Vision and a Carpet of Light". ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Retrieved 22 August 2009.
59. Hart, Nathan Scott; Theiss, Susan Michelle; Harahush, Blake Kristin; Collin, Shaun Patrick (March 2011). "Microspectrophotometric evidence for cone monochromacy in sharks". Naturwissenschaften. 98 (3): 193–201. Bibcode:2011NW.....98..193H. doi:10.1007/s00114-010-0758-8. PMID   21212930. S2CID   30148811.
    • "Sharks are colour-blind, new study finds". Australian Geographic. 19 January 2011.
60. Gill, Victoria (18 January 2011). "Sharks are probably colour-blind". BBC News. Retrieved 19 January 2011.
61. Hart, Nathan Scott; Theiss, Susan Michelle; Harahush, Blake Kristin; Collin, Shaun Patrick (March 2011). "Microspectrophotometric evidence for cone monochromacy in sharks". Naturwissenschaften. 98 (3): 193–201. Bibcode:2011NW.....98..193H. doi:10.1007/s00114-010-0758-8. PMID   21212930. S2CID   30148811.
62. Milinski, Manfred; Heller, Rolf (October 1978). "Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.)". Nature. 275 (5681): 642–644. Bibcode:1978Natur.275..642M. doi:10.1038/275642a0. S2CID   4184043.
63. Moyle & Cech 2004, p. ^{[ page needed ]}.
64. Roberts, Gilbert (May 1996). "Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases". Animal Behaviour. 51 (5): 1077–1086. doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0109. S2CID   53202810.
65. Lima, Steven L. (January 1995). "Back to the basics of anti-predatory vigilance: the group-size effect". Animal Behaviour. 49 (1): 11–20. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(95)80149-9. S2CID   53205760.
66. Fritsches, Kerstin A.; Brill, Richard W.; Warrant, Eric J. (January 2005). "Warm Eyes Provide Superior Vision in Swordfishes". Current Biology. 15 (1): 55–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.064 . PMID   15649365. S2CID   14070646.
67. Hopkin, Michael (10 January 2005). "Swordfish heat their eyes for better vision". Nature: news050110–2. doi:10.1038/news050110-2.
68. Helfman et al. 2009, pp. 95–97.
69. Somiya, H (1980). "Fishes with Eye Shine: Functional Morphology of Guanine Type Tapetum Lucidum". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2: 9–26. Bibcode:1980MEPS....2....9S. doi: 10.3354/meps002009 .
70. Johnson JA and Esser R (2009) "http://www.fishculturesection.org/Aquanotes/pdf/Aq_App_Note_1_April_2009.pdf Walleye Culture – Habituation to Feed in the Dark" American Fisheries Society, Aquaculture Application Note.
71. Douglas, Ron H.; Collin, Shaun P.; Corrigan, Julie (15 November 2002). "The eyes of suckermouth armoured catfish (Loricariidae, subfamily Hypostomus): pupil response, lenticular longitudinal spherical aberration and retinal topography". Journal of Experimental Biology. 205 (22): 3425–3433. doi:10.1242/jeb.205.22.3425. PMID   12364396.
72. Yoshizawa, Masato; Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki; O'Quin, Kelly E; Jeffery, William R (December 2012). "Evolution of an adaptive behavior and its sensory receptors promotes eye regression in blind cavefish". BMC Biology. 10 (1): 108. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-10-108 . PMC   3565949 . PMID   23270452.
73. Bone & Moore 2008, pp. 418–422.
74. Bone & Moore 2008, p. 311.
75. Atema, Jelle (1980) "Chemical senses, chemical signals, and feeding behavior in fishes" p. 57–101. In: Bardach, JE Fish behavior and its use in the capture and culture of fishes', The WorldFish Center, ISBN   978-971-02-0003-0.
76. Fields, R. Douglas; Fields, Kyle D.; Fields, Melanie C. (October 2007). "Semiconductor gel in shark sense organs?". Neuroscience Letters. 426 (3): 166–170. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2007.08.064. PMC   2211453 . PMID   17904741.
77. Brown, Brandon R. (March 2010). "Temperature response in electrosensors and thermal voltages in electrolytes". Journal of Biological Physics. 36 (2): 121–134. doi:10.1007/s10867-009-9174-8. PMC   2825305 . PMID   19760113.
78. Johnsen, Sönke; Lohmann, Kenneth J. (September 2005). "The physics and neurobiology of magnetoreception". Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 6 (9): 703–712. doi:10.1038/nrn1745. PMID   16100517. S2CID   13996233.

References

• Bone, Quentin; Moore, Richard (2008). Biology of Fishes. Garland Science. ISBN   978-0-203-88522-2.
• Helfman, Gene; Collette, Bruce B.; Facey, Douglas E.; Bowen, Brian W. (2009). The Diversity of Fishes: Biology, Evolution, and Ecology. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-1-4443-1190-7.
• Moyle, Peter B.; Cech, Joseph J. (2004). Fishes: An Introduction to Ichthyology. Pearson Prentice Hall. ISBN   978-0-13-100847-2.

Further reading

• Arthur, Joseph; Nicol, Colin; Somiya, Hiroaki (1989). The eyes of fishes. Clarendon Press. ISBN   978-0-19-857195-7.
• Douglas, R. H. & Djamgoz, M. (eds) (1990) The Visual System of Fish. Chapman and Hall, 526 pp.
• Lamb, Trevor D. (14 June 2011). "Evolution of the Eye". Scientific American. 305 (1): 64–69. Bibcode:2011SciAm.305f..64L. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0711-64.
• Land, Michael F and Nilsson, Dan-Eric (2012) Animal Eyes Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780199581146.
• Lamb, Trevor D.; Collin, Shaun P.; Pugh, Edward N. (December 2007). "Evolution of the vertebrate eye: opsins, photoreceptors, retina and eye cup". Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 8 (12): 960–976. doi:10.1038/nrn2283. PMC   3143066 . PMID   18026166.
  • "Keeping an eye on evolution". Phys.org. 3 December 2007.
• Nilsson, DE; Pelger, S (22 April 1994). "A pessimistic estimate of the time required for an eye to evolve". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 256 (1345): 53–58. Bibcode:1994RSPSB.256...53N. doi:10.1098/rspb.1994.0048. PMID   8008757. S2CID   13061351.
• Berlinski, David (2002) Has Darwin Met His Match? Page 34, The Vexing Eye (Letter). Commentary, 1 December 2002.
• Nilsson, Dan-E. "Beware of Pseudo-science: a response to David Berlinski's attack on my calculation of how long it takes for an eye to evolve". Talk Reason.
• Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno; Coddington, Paul Edward (2003). "Eyes and vision of the New Zealand torrentfish Cheimarrichthys foster VON HAAST (1874): Histology, photochemistry and electrophysiology". In Val, Adalberto Luís; Kapoor, B. G. (eds.). Fish Adaptations. Science Publishers. pp. 337–383. ISBN   978-1-57808-249-0.
• "Evolution of the Eye" – video on Nilsson-Pelger model (scroll down)

Bibliography

• Marshall, Justin; Carleton, Karen L; Cronin, Thomas (October 2015). "Colour vision in marine organisms". Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 34: 86–94. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2015.02.002. PMID   25725325. S2CID   20978931.
• Kamijo, Makiko; Kawamura, Mayuko; Fukamachi, Shoji (May 2018). "Loss of red opsin genes relaxes sexual isolation between skin-colour variants of medaka". Behavioural Processes. 150: 25–28. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2018.02.006. PMID   29447852. S2CID   4239046.

External links

• Compare Visual System of Fish to Human  – ppt
• Can Fish See Water?- AboutFishTank