Worcestershire, Bewdley | |
---|---|
Former County constituency for the House of Commons | |
1885–1950 | |
Seats | One |
Replaced by | Kidderminster and South Worcestershire |
Bewdley | |
---|---|
Former Borough constituency for the House of Commons | |
1605–1885 | |
Seats | One |
Bewdley was the name of a constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1605 until 1950. Until 1885 it was a parliamentary borough in Worcestershire, represented by one Member of Parliament; the name was then transferred to a county constituency from 1885 until 1950. Its MPs included the former Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin, who represented the seat from 1908 to 1937, and afterwards took the name of the constituency as part of his title when he was raised to the peerage.
1885-1918: The Boroughs of Bewdley and Worcester, the Sessional Divisions of Hundred House, Tenbury, and Worcester, and part of the Sessional Divisions of Malvern and Stourport.
1918-1950: The Borough of Bewdley, the Urban Districts of Malvern and Stourport, the Rural Districts of Hartley, Rock, Tenbury, and Upton-on-Severn, the Rural District which consisted of the parishes of Redmarley D'Abitot and Staunton, and in the Rural District of Tewkesbury the parishes of Chaceley and Pendock.
Bewdley was enfranchised in 1605, being one of only a handful of English boroughs electing one rather than two MPs. The borough consisted of part of Ribbesford parish in Worcestershire, of which the market town of Bewdley was the main settlement. In 1831, the population of the borough was 3,908, and contained 891 houses.
The right to vote was exercised by the bailiff and burgesses (members of the town corporation, who need not necessarily be resident in the borough); this normally amounted to only 13 voters, though the report to Parliament before the Reform Act recorded the electorate as 42. (The discrepancy is perhaps academic, since it was many years since there had been a contested election.)
In the second half of the 17th century, the inhabitants at large made several attempts to secure the right to vote by petitioning against the election results, but in each case the Commons upheld the restrictive provisions of the original grant. The corporation were entitled to nominate their own successors, meaning in theory that their power was self-sustaining. However, in the early 18th century this was circumvented by issuing a new Royal charter for the borough that extinguished the existing corporation and appointed a new one. In 1708 the Whig government had a new charter issued to eject the existing Tory-dominated corporation, and at that year's election both the old and new corporations attempted to exercise their right to vote; the Whig majority in the Commons upheld the new charter and seated the Whig candidate. After the 1710 election, however, the Whig government had lost its Commons majority and the new House declared the charter of 1708 void and the Tory candidate victorious. However, the repeal of the charter could only be secured through recourse to the courts, and although an action was begun it appears that the various parties made up their political differences before it reached a conclusion, and all sides eventually acquiesced in the new corporation's legitimacy.
For most of Bewdley's existence as a borough until the Reform Act, the corporation (and therefore the choice of its MP) was under the influence of one or other prominent local families. In the mid-17th century this control was exercised by the Foley family, but after they acquired a hold on nearby Droitwich (which elected two MPs) their interest in Bewdley seems to have waned – possibly because in Droitwich they were able to secure legal ownership of the voting rights, whereas in Bewdley they had to proceed by bribery. (In 1677, the Commons upheld a petition against Thomas Foley's election on grounds of bribery, and declared his opponent duly elected in his place.) At later periods the "patronage" was held alternately by the Lytteltons and the Winningtons; but from 1806 the influence passed to a local attorney, Wilson Roberts.
Under the Reform Act 1832, which liberalised the franchise, Bewdley's boundaries were also extended to take in the whole of Ribbesford parish; this brought six hamlets into the borough, and almost doubled the population to 7,500. This new constituency had 337 electors qualified to vote in 1832, and the second extension of the franchise with a further expansion of the borough boundaries in 1867 increased this to just over 1,000. At this period, elections were sometimes uncontested when the candidate was the head of the locally influential Winnington family, but otherwise were generally close-run affairs with the winning majority frequently under 20.
The borough was too small to retain separate representation after the Third Reform Act, and was abolished with effect from the general election of 1885; however, the Bewdley name was transferred to the new county division in which the town was placed, formally called The Western or Bewdley Division of Worcestershire. This new constituency comprised the whole of the western half of the county, largely rural but including the town of Great Malvern, which contributed about a third of the population; the Worcester freeholders (who were entitled to a county vote even though their property was within the borough boundaries) also voted here. It was a very safe Conservative seat. Alfred Baldwin was elected as MP in 1892, holding the seat until his death in 1908. He was succeeded by his son, Stanley, who later became Prime Minister while still Bewdley's MP.
The constituency (now simply the Worcestershire, Bewdley Division) was redrawn in 1918, its southern end being transferred to the Evesham seat and acquiring instead part of the north-western corner of the county including Stourport, previously in the abolished Droitwich division. These changes had little effect on the political complexion of Bewdley, and Baldwin generally secured twice as many votes as his nearest opponent, when the constituency was contested at all – indeed, in three of the five elections he fought as Prime Minister Bewdley returned him unopposed.
The Bewdley division was abolished with effect from the general election of 1950, being divided between the Kidderminster constituency (in which Bewdley itself was placed) and Worcestershire South (which included Malvern).
Election | Member | Party | |
---|---|---|---|
1885 | Sir Edmund Lechmere, Bt | Conservative | |
1892 | Alfred Baldwin | Conservative | |
1908 by-election | Stanley Baldwin | Conservative | |
1937 by-election | Roger Conant | Conservative | |
1950 | constituency abolished: see Kidderminster & South Worcestershire |
1830s – 1840s – 1850s – 1860s – 1870s – 1880s – 1890s – 1900s – 1910s – 1920s – 1930s – 1940s – Notes |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Wilson Aylesbury Roberts | Unopposed | |||
Tory hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Wilson Aylesbury Roberts | Unopposed | |||
Tory hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Thomas Winnington | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 337 | ||||
Whig gain from Tory |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Thomas Winnington | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 414 | ||||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Thomas Winnington | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 400 | ||||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Thomas Winnington | 173 | 50.7 | N/A | |
Conservative | Robert Monteith [17] | 168 | 49.3 | N/A | |
Majority | 5 | 1.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 341 | 83.0 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 411 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Thomas James Ireland | 160 | 50.3 | +1.0 | |
Whig | Thomas Winnington | 158 | 49.7 | −1.0 | |
Majority | 2 | 0.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 318 | 83.9 | +0.9 | ||
Registered electors | 411 | ||||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +1.0 | |||
Ireland's election was declared void on petition due to bribery and corrupt treating, [18] causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Montagu | 171 | 52.3 | +2.0 | |
Whig | Spencer Lyttelton [19] [20] | 156 | 47.7 | −2.0 | |
Majority | 15 | 4.6 | +4.0 | ||
Turnout | 327 | 83.0 | −0.9 | ||
Registered electors | 394 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +2.0 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Thomas Winnington | 169 | 52.8 | +3.1 | |
Peelite | Joseph Sandars [21] [22] | 151 | 47.2 | −3.1 | |
Majority | 18 | 5.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 320 | 82.1 | −1.9 | ||
Registered electors | 390 | ||||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | +3.1 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Thomas Winnington | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 370 | ||||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Thomas Winnington | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 386 | ||||
Liberal hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Thomas Winnington | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 356 | ||||
Liberal hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Richard Atwood Glass | 518 | 55.3 | New | |
Liberal | Thomas Lloyd [23] | 418 | 44.7 | N/A | |
Majority | 100 | 10.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 936 | 89.7 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 1,043 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | N/A | |||
The election was declared void on petition on grounds of bribery. [24]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Pickersgill-Cunliffe | 477 | 50.7 | −4.6 | |
Liberal | Augustus Anson | 463 | 49.3 | +4.6 | |
Majority | 14 | 1.4 | −9.2 | ||
Turnout | 940 | 90.1 | +0.4 | ||
Registered electors | 1,043 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +4.6 | |||
This by-election was also subject to petition. On scrutiny, Cunliffe was unseated and Anson was named MP in his place. Back to Elections
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Charles Harrison | 504 | 55.4 | +10.7 | |
Conservative | Stanley Leighton | 405 | 44.5 | −10.8 | |
Independent Liberal | George Griffith | 1 | 0.1 | New | |
Majority | 99 | 10.9 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 910 | 84.1 | −5.6 | ||
Registered electors | 1,082 | ||||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | +10.8 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Charles Harrison | 598 | 53.0 | −2.4 | |
Conservative | Richard Webster | 530 | 47.0 | +2.5 | |
Majority | 68 | 6.0 | −4.9 | ||
Turnout | 1,128 | 91.9 | +7.8 | ||
Registered electors | 1,228 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −2.5 | |||
The result was declared void on petition, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Enoch Baldwin | 611 | 55.4 | +2.4 | |
Liberal | William Nichols Marcy [26] | 491 | 44.6 | −2.4 | |
Majority | 120 | 10.8 | +4.8 | ||
Turnout | 1,102 | 89.7 | −2.2 | ||
Registered electors | 1,228 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +2.4 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Sir Edmund Lechmere, Bt | 4,525 | 60.0 | +13.0 | |
Liberal | John Fell [28] | 3,015 | 40.0 | -13.0 | |
Majority | 1,510 | 20.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 7,540 | 76.7 | -15.2 | ||
Registered electors | 9,833 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +15.4 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Sir Edmund Lechmere, Bt | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alfred Baldwin | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alfred Baldwin | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alfred Baldwin | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alfred Baldwin | 5,912 | 68.5 | N/A | |
Liberal | Godfrey Benson | 2,718 | 31.5 | New | |
Majority | 3,194 | 37.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 8,630 | 84.4 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 10,231 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Stanley Baldwin | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Stanley Baldwin | 6,618 | 73.6 | +5.1 | |
Liberal | J.L. Brooks | 2,370 | 26.4 | −5.1 | |
Majority | 4,248 | 47.2 | +10.2 | ||
Turnout | 8,988 | 84.5 | +0.1 | ||
Registered electors | 10,638 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +5.1 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Stanley Baldwin | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
General Election 1914–15:
Another General Election was required to take place before the end of 1915. The political parties had been making preparations for an election to take place and by the July 1914, the following candidates had been selected;
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | Unionist | Stanley Baldwin | Unopposed | ||
Unionist hold | |||||
Cindicates candidate endorsed by the coalition government. |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | Unionist | Stanley Baldwin | 14,537 | 89.6 | N/A |
Independent Labour | H. Mills | 1,680 | 10.4 | New | |
Majority | 12,857 | 79.2 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 16,217 | 63.7 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 25,440 | ||||
Unionist hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Cindicates candidate endorsed by the coalition government. |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Stanley Baldwin | 11,192 | 66.1 | N/A | |
Liberal | Sardius Hancock | 5,748 | 33.9 | New | |
Majority | 5,444 | 32.2 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 16,940 | 64.7 | N/A | ||
Unionist hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Stanley Baldwin | 12,395 | 67.3 | +1.2 | |
Liberal | Sardius Hancock | 6,026 | 32.7 | -1.2 | |
Majority | 6,369 | 34.6 | +2.4 | ||
Turnout | 18,421 | 68.8 | +4.1 | ||
Unionist hold | Swing | +1.2 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Stanley Baldwin | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Unionist hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Stanley Baldwin | 16,593 | 62.9 | N/A | |
Liberal | Sidney Benjamin Carter | 7,186 | 27.3 | New | |
Labour | Sardius Hancock | 2,575 | 9.8 | New | |
Majority | 9,407 | 35.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 26,354 | 71.3 | N/A | ||
Unionist hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Stanley Baldwin | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Stanley Baldwin | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Roger Conant | 15,054 | 63.9 | N/A | |
Liberal | Donald Johnson | 8,511 | 36.1 | New | |
Majority | 6,543 | 27.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 23,565 | 60.6 | N/A | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
A General election was due to take place before the end of 1940, but was postponed due to the Second World War. By 1939, the following candidates had been selected to contest this constituency;
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Roger Conant | 17,393 | 55.0 | N/A | |
Liberal | Gerald Samson | 14,223 | 45.0 | N/A | |
Majority | 3,170 | 10.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 31,616 | 67.5 | N/A | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | ||||
Taunton was a constituency represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom and its predecessors from 1295 to 2010, taking its name from the town of Taunton in Somerset. Until 1918, it was a parliamentary borough, electing two Member of Parliaments (MPs) between 1295 and 1885 and one from 1885 to 1918; the name was then transferred to a county constituency, electing one MP.
City of Durham is a constituency represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since 2019 by Mary Foy of the Labour Party.
Worcester is a borough constituency represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. Since 1885 it has elected one Member of Parliament (MP) by the first past the post system of election; from 1295 to 1885 it elected two MPs.
West Worcestershire is a constituency in Worcestershire represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since 2010 by Harriett Baldwin, a Conservative. The constituency is considered a safe seat for the Conservatives. The constituency boundaries roughly correspond with the Malvern Hills District.
Bedford is a constituency represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since 2017 by Mohammad Yasin of the Labour Party.
Ipswich is a constituency represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since December 2019 by Tom Hunt of the Conservative Party.
Maidstone was a parliamentary constituency represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
Kidderminster was a parliamentary constituency in Worcestershire, represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It elected one Member of Parliament (MP) by the first past the post voting system.
Barnstaple was a constituency centred on the town of Barnstaple in Devon, in the South West of England. It returned two Members of Parliament to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom until 1885, thereafter, one.
Cricklade was a parliamentary constituency named after the town of Cricklade in Wiltshire.
Evesham was a parliamentary constituency in Worcestershire which was represented in the British House of Commons. Originally a parliamentary borough consisting of the town of Evesham, it was first represented in 1295. After this its franchise lapsed for several centuries, but it then returned two Members of Parliament (MPs) from 1604 until 1868, when its representation was reduced to one member under the Representation of the People Act 1867.
Bridport was a parliamentary borough in Dorset, England, which elected two Members of Parliament (MP) to the House of Commons from 1295 until 1868, and then one member from 1868 until 1885, when the borough was abolished.
Boston was a parliamentary borough in Lincolnshire, which elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons from 1547 until 1885, and then one member from 1885 until 1918, when the constituency was abolished.
Droitwich was the name of a constituency of the House of Commons of England in 1295, and again from 1554, then of the House of Commons of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1918. It was a parliamentary borough in Worcestershire, represented by two Members of Parliament until 1832, and by one member from 1832 to 1885. The name was then transferred to a county constituency electing one MP from 1885 until 1918.
Great Marlow, sometimes simply called Marlow, was a parliamentary borough in Buckinghamshire. It elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons of England between 1301 and 1307, and again from 1624 until 1707, then in the House of Commons of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and finally in the House of Commons of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1868. It elected one member from 1868 until 1885, when the borough was abolished.
Shaftesbury was a parliamentary constituency in Dorset. It returned two Members of Parliament to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1295 until 1832 and one member until the constituency was abolished in 1885.
East Worcestershire was a county constituency in the county of Worcestershire, represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
Sandwich was a parliamentary constituency in Kent, which elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons from 1366 until 1885, when it was disfranchised for corruption.